20
Overcoming Barriers to Effective Collaboration ATE Conference October 27, 2011 Dr. Vera Zdravkovich Dr. Costis Toregas Dr. Costis Toregas Dr. Bob Spear

2011 ATE Conference Panel Session

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Panel: Overcoming Barriers to Effective Collaboration

Citation preview

Page 1: 2011 ATE Conference Panel Session

Overcoming Barriers gto Effective Collaboration

ATE ConferenceOctober 27, 2011

Dr. Vera ZdravkovichDr. Costis ToregasDr. Costis ToregasDr. Bob Spear

Page 2: 2011 ATE Conference Panel Session

Collaborator C iCategories

• Academe

• Industry• Industry• Civil Societyy

Page 3: 2011 ATE Conference Panel Session

CyberWatch and AcademeCyberWatch and Academe

• Colleges and Universities • ATE Centers, K‐12 o eges a d U e s es e e s,systems/schools, state systems

Consortium of 80:

• 47 community collegesy g

• 33 universities

• 26 states

Page 4: 2011 ATE Conference Panel Session

Academic CollaborationsAcademic Collaborations

• Mutually beneficial relationshipsp

• Different levels of partnerships from close topartnerships from close to superficial

Page 5: 2011 ATE Conference Panel Session

Mutual BenefitsBenefits

• Center gains recognition, advocacy, broader dissemination

• Center programs address partners’ pneeds

Page 6: 2011 ATE Conference Panel Session

Mutual BenefitsMutual Benefits

• Partners utilizePartners utilize Center programs and expertiseand expertise

Curriculum Development

Professional Development

A i l iArticulation Models 

Page 7: 2011 ATE Conference Panel Session

Levels of PartnershipsPartnerships

• Active participationActive participation 

• Joint program developmentdevelopment

• Extensive faculty linvolvement

• Occasional participation

• In the name onlyy

Page 8: 2011 ATE Conference Panel Session

ChallengesChallenges

• How to maximize partners’How to maximize partners  engagement and utilize their potential and pexpertise most effectively?

• How to maximize Center’sHow to maximize Center s program effectiveness for all two‐ and four‐year yinstitutional partners?

Page 9: 2011 ATE Conference Panel Session

ChallengesChallenges

• How to engage administrators at partner institutions?

• How to attract new academic partners?

Page 10: 2011 ATE Conference Panel Session

CyberWatch and IndustryCyberWatch and Industry

• Local/Small Businesses • National BusinessesLocal/Small Businesses National Businesses

Page 11: 2011 ATE Conference Panel Session

What a wise person saidWhat a wise person said

• I like overcoming as it is a process and whileI like overcoming as it is a process and, while the goal is in sight, it is not a done deal

Page 12: 2011 ATE Conference Panel Session

CyberWatch and the Private sectorCyberWatch and the Private sector

• Open and strongOpen and strong relationships

• Multiple platforms toMultiple platforms to engage– Advisory Boardy– CCDC sponsors– Source of internships– Proposal partners– …

Page 13: 2011 ATE Conference Panel Session

ObservationsObservations

• Industry and Academia are different‐ but not that different

• Outcome vs. profit based institutionsp

• Importance of Listening

• Need to translate vocabulary• Need to translate vocabulary

Page 14: 2011 ATE Conference Panel Session

And the business endAnd the business end

• Each partner should visibly benefitEach partner should visibly benefit

• Explicit taboos outlined early

k h d h k• Making money together and sharing is Ok

Page 15: 2011 ATE Conference Panel Session

So to support the wise personSo to support the wise person

• It's never a done deal and that isIt s never a done deal, and that is why outcome agreements are not as good as Trust and Processgood as Trust and Process

Page 16: 2011 ATE Conference Panel Session

CyberWatch and Civil SocietyCyberWatch and Civil Society

• Government • ProfessionalGovernment Professional  Associations

Page 17: 2011 ATE Conference Panel Session

Identify Potential CollaboratorsIdentify Potential Collaborators

• Backdrop to all ac d op o acollaborations– What does the ATE center 

/ d?want/need?

– What might the collaborator want/need?

• Start with public info:– Websites, publications

• Meet reps at conferences

• Top‐down, or bottom up?

Page 18: 2011 ATE Conference Panel Session

Building the CollaborationBuilding the Collaboration

• Initial meetingInitial meeting

• Focus on listening

• Discuss mission andDiscuss mission and objectives, not organization or gprocedures

Page 19: 2011 ATE Conference Panel Session

Types of CollaborationTypes of Collaboration

• Links to each other’s websitesLinks to each other s websites• Articles in each other’s pubs• Joint presentations at conferences• Joint presentations at conferences• Sharing a booth at conferencesSh i f t t l t k• Sharing of contacts, people networks

• Joint advertizing and promotion• Guest speakers for each other’s events• Joint activities and programs

Page 20: 2011 ATE Conference Panel Session

Discussion QuestionsDiscussion QuestionsDiscussion QuestionsDiscussion Questions

• How do you identify potential collaborators?How do you identify potential collaborators? How do you approach them?

• How do you design a collaboration that worksHow do you design a collaboration that works to the benefit of both parties? 

• How do you address the challenges we haveHow do you address the challenges we have identified?

• What collaborative strategies have worked forWhat collaborative strategies have worked for your center?

• What other challenges have you encountered?What other challenges have you encountered?