Upload
mark-ollis
View
44
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Barton on Sea
How do the strategies compare?
• First impressions?
• Which elements can you identify?
Hard Engineering• Mixture of wooden groynes and Rock
armour groynes.• Why – largely historical
Rock revetment • Replaces wooden revetment backed
by infill• Protects the toe of the slopes• Adds weight to the seawards side of
the slope system
History - outline• 1930s protection from timber groynes• Halted during war• 1964 to 1968 – Cliff toe protection – Timber revetment, rock revetment – timber and rock groynes = successful
• 1965 to 1968 Sheet pile cut off wall with drainage
• 1971 Replacement of timber with rock armour groynes
• 1996 Cliff drainage system replaced
Successful Revetment
Costs
• 1971 • Replacement with 90 000 tonnes
rock armour• Carboniferous limestone from Mendip
Hills• 1.5km coast• Each stone 2 to 6 tonnes• Provides toe protection and toe
weight
Success?
Overall role of holding the line successfulWithin the slope system collapses in 1975, 1993 and 2016.Sheet piling added in 65 to 68 with drainage, pore pressure overturned
Geology within system still allows percolation and so loads Charma bedsBoreholes in 2016 to 2017 to collect data
Ineffective Piling
Geology• Upper layers – Plateau gravels
• Upper, middle and lower Barton Clays – 3 layers
• Charma bed – water bearing sandy, silty clays.
• Area closed post 2016 upper slip
• FUTURE • 18 boreholes will
be drilled• 10 at cliff top• 8 in the under-cliff• 20m to 35 m deep
to collect data
• Aim – to better understand the sub-surface movement.
• http://www.southampton.ac.uk/~imw/barteros.htm
What about Naish cliff – West Barton
Naish • Holiday development which can be moved back
from edge c.f. substantial 1930s development in E. Barton
• TOO Expensive – groyne, toe protection, drainage c.f. a lack of permanent development
• 1993 – compromise solution suggested – 3 strongpoints would 1) diffuse erosion, 2) mainatain beach structure, 3) won’t damage geology SSSI, 4) improve recreational value.
• NOT IMPLETMENTED – suggestion that tension cracking and aerial erosion will continue until face resolves angle of repose.