22
Barton on Sea How do the strategies compare?

2. barton on sea v3

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 2. barton on sea v3

Barton on Sea

How do the strategies compare?

Page 2: 2. barton on sea v3

• First impressions?

Page 3: 2. barton on sea v3

• Which elements can you identify?

Page 4: 2. barton on sea v3
Page 5: 2. barton on sea v3
Page 6: 2. barton on sea v3
Page 7: 2. barton on sea v3

Hard Engineering• Mixture of wooden groynes and Rock

armour groynes.• Why – largely historical

Page 8: 2. barton on sea v3
Page 9: 2. barton on sea v3

Rock revetment • Replaces wooden revetment backed

by infill• Protects the toe of the slopes• Adds weight to the seawards side of

the slope system

Page 10: 2. barton on sea v3

History - outline• 1930s protection from timber groynes• Halted during war• 1964 to 1968 – Cliff toe protection – Timber revetment, rock revetment – timber and rock groynes = successful

• 1965 to 1968 Sheet pile cut off wall with drainage

• 1971 Replacement of timber with rock armour groynes

• 1996 Cliff drainage system replaced

Page 11: 2. barton on sea v3

Successful Revetment

Page 12: 2. barton on sea v3

Costs

• 1971 • Replacement with 90 000 tonnes

rock armour• Carboniferous limestone from Mendip

Hills• 1.5km coast• Each stone 2 to 6 tonnes• Provides toe protection and toe

weight

Page 13: 2. barton on sea v3

Success?

Overall role of holding the line successfulWithin the slope system collapses in 1975, 1993 and 2016.Sheet piling added in 65 to 68 with drainage, pore pressure overturned

Geology within system still allows percolation and so loads Charma bedsBoreholes in 2016 to 2017 to collect data

Page 14: 2. barton on sea v3

Ineffective Piling

Page 15: 2. barton on sea v3

Geology• Upper layers – Plateau gravels

• Upper, middle and lower Barton Clays – 3 layers

• Charma bed – water bearing sandy, silty clays.

Page 16: 2. barton on sea v3
Page 17: 2. barton on sea v3

• Area closed post 2016 upper slip

Page 18: 2. barton on sea v3

• FUTURE • 18 boreholes will

be drilled• 10 at cliff top• 8 in the under-cliff• 20m to 35 m deep

to collect data

• Aim – to better understand the sub-surface movement.

Page 20: 2. barton on sea v3

What about Naish cliff – West Barton

Page 21: 2. barton on sea v3

Naish • Holiday development which can be moved back

from edge c.f. substantial 1930s development in E. Barton

• TOO Expensive – groyne, toe protection, drainage c.f. a lack of permanent development

• 1993 – compromise solution suggested – 3 strongpoints would 1) diffuse erosion, 2) mainatain beach structure, 3) won’t damage geology SSSI, 4) improve recreational value.

• NOT IMPLETMENTED – suggestion that tension cracking and aerial erosion will continue until face resolves angle of repose.

Page 22: 2. barton on sea v3