39

Click here to load reader

03 crime as choice

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 03 crime as choice

Crime as Choice

CJS 380 Crime Science:Principles, Strategies and Practice of

Crime Prevention and Reduction©

J.A. Gilmer

Page 2: 03 crime as choice

2

Classical and Neoclassical Traditions

• Reaction to punishment of crime based the ‘divine authority’ assumed by the state

Page 3: 03 crime as choice

3

Cesare Beccaria

On Crimes and Punishments (1764)

• Thesis of reform based on rational criminal justice & punishment

• Human nature is ‘hedonistic’; so no need to ‘explain crime’

• Society based on social contract– Rational choice – Individual accountable for own action

• Punishment should ‘fit the crime’– Certain, swift, proportionate 1738-1794

Page 4: 03 crime as choice

4

Principles of Classical Deterrence

• Certainty – punishment will be administered • Swiftness –in temporal proximity to crime• Severity – in sufficient measure to prevent

recurrenceCritique• Equal imposition of punishments not practical• Mitigating circumstances cannot be considered• All equal in terms of moral responsibility

Page 5: 03 crime as choice

5

Neoclassical Adaptations

• Recognized certain conditions as more amenable to ‘free choice’

• Some rational choice constrained by factors beyond control of individual– Pre-existing conditions– Variation in opportunity structure

• Choosing to commit crime still valid but limitations are recognized

Page 6: 03 crime as choice

6

RATIONAL CHOICE PERSPECTIVENEOCLASSICAL CRIMINOLOGY

Page 7: 03 crime as choice

7

The Rational Choice Theory

• Offenders seek to benefit themselves by criminal behavioro Even impulsive or pathologically

motivated offenders• Crime-specific focuso Situational context of decision making

and information processed varies greatly • Distinguishes between criminal involvement and the criminal event

Cornish, D and R. Clarke (1986) “Introduction.” The Reasoning Criminal

Page 8: 03 crime as choice

8

Model of Criminal Involvement

Criminal Involvement Process

1. Background factors2. Past Learning/Experience3. Generalized Need4. Solutions Evaluated5. Perceived Solution6. Reaction to Chance Event7. Readiness (decision pt.)8. Decision

Source: Cornish and Clarke (1986)

Page 9: 03 crime as choice

9

Crime Event Model

Source: Cornish and Clarke (1986)

Page 10: 03 crime as choice

10

Modeling Persistence

Source: Cornish and Clarke (1986)

Page 11: 03 crime as choice

11

Modeling Desistence

Source: Cornish and Clarke (1986)

Page 12: 03 crime as choice

12

Summary of Rational Choice Theory

• Assumes that criminals are “rational actors”– Assess risks – perceived gains against perceived

likelihood getting caught and punished– Distinguish decision of criminal involvement from

decision to commit crime• Individual differences between criminals and non-

criminals are irrelevant (not positivist)• Need to examine particular crimes and criminal

methods more closely• Reduce crime by focusing on criminal event and

situational factors contributing to it

Page 13: 03 crime as choice

13

ROUTINE ACTIVITIES THEORYNEOCLASSICAL CRIMINOLOGY

Page 14: 03 crime as choice

14

Routine Activities Theory• Macro-level theory to Rational

Choice’s micro• Sought to explain increase in

crime during period of relative affluence

• Focused on crime relative to structural change in lifestyles – Less time at home with family– More time with non-family– Direct contact predatory violations

Cohen, Lawrence E. and Marcus Felson (1979). “Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach.” American Sociological Review. 44:588-605.

Marcus Felson

Page 15: 03 crime as choice

15

The Crime Triangle

• Motivated Offenders– Not problematic for theory

• Suitable Targets– Huge increases in consumer

spending and availability of “portable” goods since WWII

• Absence of Capable Guardians– More people in workforce– Anonymity of modern life– Police not the problem

CRIME

Page 16: 03 crime as choice

16

The Crime Triangle (with Controllers)

Controller – formal or informal responsibility to monitor

• Handler– Close enough to exercise

control over offender• Manager

– Controller for specific location• Guardian

– Formal: police/security– Informal: family/owner or

recruited/“Samaritan”

CRIME

Page 17: 03 crime as choice

17

Association with Social Control Theory

• Social Bond as “handle”– Attachment to others– Commitment to conformity– Involvement in conventional

activities– Belief in legal/normative values

• Intimate handlers– Parents, legal guardians

• Informants– Close neighbors

Travis Hirschi

Page 18: 03 crime as choice

18

Summary of Routine Activities

• Assumes “rational actors” calculate cost/benefit• Accounts for social change at macro (structural)

level• Requires “direct violation” that involves– Motivated offender– Vulnerable target of victim– Lack of capable guardianship

Page 19: 03 crime as choice

19

CRIME PATTERN THEORYNEOCLASSICAL CRIMINOLOGY

Page 20: 03 crime as choice

20

Environmental Criminology• Based in human and social

ecology • Understand crime, criminality

and victimization by examining the physicality in which crimes occur

• Determinants of crime: law, offenders, targets, and places

• Reduce crime opportunities by manipulating space and place

Paul and Patricia Brantingham

Brantingham, P. J. & Brantingham, P. L. (1991). Environmental Criminology. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.

Page 21: 03 crime as choice

21

Concepts of Crime Pattern Theory• Action Space – physical spatial patterns in which

individuals live their lives• Nodes – daily places of to/from movement• Awareness Space –areas individuals have

information about; envelops action space• Paths – routes between personal activity nodes• Cognitive Map – movements along paths

between personal activity nodes about which mental images of the environment are formed

Page 22: 03 crime as choice

22

More Concepts• Edges – “sharp visual break” in environment

between different kinds of land use: residential/commercial, arterials, college campuses, parks, etc.– Discrete: divides neighborhoods – creates “in-

between” area– Connected: by motorized transport; increased

mobility allows quick, easy in/out access

Page 23: 03 crime as choice

23

Cognitive Maps

• Mental map derived from awareness space• Distance decay function – increased distance

from activity nodes results in less ‘comfort’– Offenders less likely to search for targets, thus

committing fewer crimes – Distance decay varies by crime type: • Expressive (affective) – more spontaneous, emotional• Instrumental -- buffer zone around home

Page 24: 03 crime as choice

24

The City, Awareness Space, & Mental Maps

• Urban design, traffic/transit patterns, and criminal activity“awareness spaces and cognitive maps of both offenders and non-offenders will vary based on the actual structure of the city and its transportation system.” (p. 94)

• Implications for urban planners and real estate developers– Grid street system easier to negotiate than “organic” system– What is Albany’s street pattern?

Page 25: 03 crime as choice

25

Crime Pattern Theory Elements – 1• Basic Assumption: rational motivated offender

searches for suitable targets w/in awareness space• Motivation: diverse sources, strength and

character of motivation vary• Actual Crime Commission: end result of multistage

decision process– Seek out/identify target/victim within general

environment positioned in time and space– High affect motivation ≈ minimal number of stages– High instrumental motivation ≈ many stages/searches

Page 26: 03 crime as choice

26

Crime Pattern Theory Elements – 2

• Environmental Cues: environment emits of physical, spatial, cultural, legal, psychological signals– May be generalized or detailed

• Cues Aid in Target/Victim Identification: experience or learned social transmission

• Experiential Knowledge: cues are basis for ‘template’ for victim/target selection

• Template Construction & Search Process: conscious or unconscious; once established, becomes fixed

• Clustering of targets/victims: minimizes number of and helps identify offender ‘templates’

Page 27: 03 crime as choice

27

Is Crime Rational?• No simple answer• Alcohol/drugs impair decision making and limit

rationality • Low self-control & impulsivity limit rationality– The dimensions of self-control affects an individual’s

ability to calculate and appreciate the long-term consequences of action – particularly hedonistic, self-satisfying criminal behavior

• But … decisions need not be ‘completely rational’ to meet assumptions of choice theory

Page 28: 03 crime as choice

28

Study of 86 Active Armed Robbers

• Offender motivation– Why do the authors believe it is

fundamental to understanding criminal behavior?

• Why did subjects rob?– Walking ATMs– Keep up appearances– Inadequate legal work– Pay back money borrowed

Richard Wright

Page 29: 03 crime as choice

29

Why robbery?

• Safer/fewer hassles – selling burg swag, dealing with

junkies• Low technical / interpersonal

skill set– unlike bank robbery or fraud

• Quick and easy source of cash for “cash intensive lifestyle”

Page 30: 03 crime as choice

30

Back to Motivation

• Rational choice and routine activities theories assume offenders motivated to crime

• Social control theory assumes criminal motivation is inherent in human nature (and thus irrelevant in explaining crime)

• Conduct norms of street-culture emphasize spontaneous hedonism against reflection on long-term consequences and other options

Page 31: 03 crime as choice

31

Jacobs & Wright’s Robbery Model

Financial Desperation

Predisposing background risk factors

Participation in street culture

Pursuit of illicit action/conspicuous

consumption

Robbery

Disposable cash

Page 32: 03 crime as choice

32

A LOOK AROUND ALBANYExercise

Page 33: 03 crime as choice

33

Albany Online Crime Mappinghttp://www.albanyny.org/Government/Departments/Police/cmapping/maps.aspx

Page 34: 03 crime as choice

34

APPSNET – Pine Hills CrimeZoom inZoom outPanIdentifyRedrawZoom previousInitial extentPrint

Page 35: 03 crime as choice

35

Bing Maps – Bird’s Eye View

http://www.bing.com/maps/Default.aspx?encType=1&v=2&ss=ypid.YN640x11256014&style=r&FORM=LLDP

Science Center

Page 36: 03 crime as choice

36

Urban Campus Safety Project

How could neoclassical approaches to the theory of crime, criminality and victimization inform the analysis of crime problems for a college campus embedded in an urban environment?►Rational Choice Theory►Routine Activities Theory►Crime Pattern Theory

Page 37: 03 crime as choice

37

CRIME SCIENCE AND CRIMINOLOGY

Page 38: 03 crime as choice

38

What is Crime Science?Traditional criminology seeks to improve understanding of the psychological and social forces that cause people to become criminals in the hope of finding ways to change these causes. Crime science takes a radically different approach. It focuses not on the reasons why criminals are born or made, but on the act of committing crime. It seeks ways to reduce the opportunities and temptations for crime and increase the risks of detection. In doing so, it seeks contributions from a wide range of disciplines, including psychology, geography, medicine, town planning, and architecture. Crime science explicitly seeks to be judged by the extent to which it helps to reduce crime on our streets, and in our homes and businesses.Source: Jill Dando Institute for Crime Science. (2004). http://www.jdi.ucl.ac.uk/about/crime_science/index.php

Page 39: 03 crime as choice

39

Criminology | Crime Science