14
IP Presentation Highland Capital Partners Roundtable Steven J. Frank, Partner Goodwin Procter August 2, 2007 © 2007 Goodwin Procter LLP

Frank Ip Slides For Highland

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

  • 1. IP Presentation Highland Capital Partners Roundtable Steven J. Frank, Partner Goodwin Procter August 2, 2007 2007 Goodwin ProcterLLP

2. About Goodwin Procter

  • Over 750 attorneys in Boston, Los Angeles, New York, Palo Alto, San Diego, San Francisco, Washington, D.C.
  • Nationally recognized expertise representing technology and life sciences companies, financial services companies, as well as private equity and venture capital firms
  • Nationally recognized expertise in intellectual property, products liability, FDA, commercial litigation, real estate and business law

3. Rankings & Recognition

  • NATIONAL RECOGNITIONin Chambers 2007 in the areas of Intellectual Property, Litigation, Financial Services, Life Sciences; Private Equity: Buyouts & Venture Capital Investment; and REITs
  • ONE OF THE TOPIP defense firms(IP Law & Business)
  • ONE OF THE TOP 10firms for superior Client Service ( BTI Power Rankings )
  • RANKED 2 NDIN THE NATIONin technology support among the AmLaw 200(American Lawyer Tech Scorecard)
  • Ranked in theGUIDE TO THE WORLDS LEADING EXPERTSin Trademark Law and The Top 50 Trademark Attorneys

4. Representative IP Clients 5. The Basics

  • What is IP
  • and
  • Why do I care?

6. Protection mechanisms for technology

  • Patents
  • Protect
    • Machines
    • Processes
    • Chemical compositions
    • almost anything you can think of
  • Independent development is no defense to infringement

7. Protection mechanisms for technology (contd)

  • Copyright
  • Protects
    • Lots of stuff, but in terms of technology, primary relevance is software
  • Limitations
    • Narrowly applied
    • Doesnt exclude independent development

8. Protection mechanisms for technology (contd)

  • Trade Secrets
  • Courts help those who help themselves
    • Need to take steps to maintain secrecy
    • Courts are concerned with unfair competition, not technology protection
  • Independent development, reverse engineering defeat trade secrets
    • Once the cat is out of the bag ...

9. The Basics of Patents

  • Must be something inventive (relatively high bar) and useful (relatively low bar)
  • Must not have been publicly disclosed more than one year ago (for US patents)
  • Who is the inventor?
  • A patent does not guarantee that you can actually practice the invention
  • Will take a long time (~4 years) and cost a lot of money (~$15,000)

10. Why Does Anyone Care?

  • Wall out Competitors
  • Defense
  • Potential Income
  • Value on Exit
  • Credibility to Investors
  • Articulated Description of Market Differentiation

11. Avoiding Common Pitfalls

  • Work on your own time and equipment
  • Understand your current obligations
  • Document contributions from others
  • Document code provenance
  • Get assignments
  • File something before you launch (provisionals)
  • Do some searching
  • Focus on the product, not patents

12. Provisional Full PatentApplication and (maybe) International (PCT) Application Non-Public Disclosure Tinkering Public Disclosure Patent Pending 1 Year Foreign Patent Filings 18 Months

  • Provisionals generally cost between $1,000 and $5,000
  • Full applications generally cost between $8,000 and $15,000
  • Strive for high reuse between provisional and full application
  • PCT applications cost approximately $4-5,000 almost all official fees
  • Foreign applications cost between $3,000 (AU, CA) and $15,000 (EP and Japan)
  • One well-drafted application can often lead to numerous issued patents

13. Possible Changes

  • Accelerated Examination
  • Peer Review
  • Post-Grant Opposition
  • Changes to Continuation Practice
  • First-to-file

14. IP Presentation Highland Capital Partners Roundtable Steven J. Frank, Partner Goodwin Procter August 2, 2007 2007 Goodwin ProcterLLP