39
Financial Engineering : Is it a nuclear option? Stavros A. Zenios University of Cyprus The Wharton Financial Institutions Center MIE Distinguished Seminar Series University of Toronto April 2013

Financial engineering the nuclear option

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

Financial Engineering : Is it a nuclear option?"

Stavros A. Zenios"University of Cyprus"

The Wharton Financial Institutions Center"

MIE Distinguished Seminar Series!University of Toronto! April 2013!

Page 2: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

2

OUTLINE"

•  The issue!•  Three applications:!

– Products with Guarantees and Personal Financial Planning!

– Collateralized Mortgage Obligations !– European Stability Bonds!

•  Reflexivity of financial engineering!

Page 3: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

When does financial engineering backfire"

– Errors are magnified through optimization!•  Constraints ignored or mis-specified!•  Data errors!

– Response!•  robust optimization, stochastic programming,

scenario optimization!!

– Create a reflexive world!•  When successful and large-scale!•  Success and large-scale may hurt you!

– Response!•  ???!

3

Page 4: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

4

Products with guarantees"

•  Financial innovation: insurance + investment!•  Minimum guaranteed return: “Smoothing”!

–  Pension funds!–  Life insurance policies and mutual funds !–  Investment side of commercial Banks!–  Personal financial planning!

•  Fixed income securities can hardly yield the guarantee!•  Regulatory restrictions!

Page 5: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

5

Participating policies"

•  Sum insured payable if event occurs!•  Otherwise the insured sum capitalized at the

rate of an asset portfolio!– bonus policy"

•  Minimum guaranteed rate of return!•  Lapse option to surrender the policy!

Page 6: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

6

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Portfolio Retuns Policy Returns

Suffer shortfall

Build buffer

Page 7: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

7

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Time period

Cu

mu

lati

ve

re

turn

sFloor Asset returns Policy returns Lifted floor

Page 8: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

8

Bonus Policies"•  Italian firms:!

–  Bonuses are contractually specified!–  Policyholders receive a fixed percentage of excess returns!

•  UK firms:!–  Flexibility in determining the bonus policies!–  Can reduce bonuses if asset portfolio performs poorly!–  Policyholders’ Reasonable Expectations (PRE)!

Page 9: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

9

Modeling issues"

•  Pricing the options!– guarantee (bond)!– bonus (European option)!–  lapse (American option)!

•  Brennan and Schwartz (1976), Boyle and Schwartz (1977)!•  Grosen and Jorgensen (1999), Bacinello (1999)

Giraldi et al. (2000), Siglienti (2000)!

Page 10: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

10

Further modeling issues"

•  Capitalizing the product!•  Satisfy regulatory requirements!•  Design competitive policies!

Page 11: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

11

Enterprise Wide Risk Management"

•  Design new product!•  Integrate disparate sources of risk!•  Financial risks and business risks!

Simulation + Optimization!!Holmer and Zenios, Integrated financial product management,

Operations Research, Vol. 43, 1995. !

Page 12: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

12

Stochastic Programming"

•  Optimization under uncertainty !•  Dynamic: decisions are revised with time

as more information is received!•  Anticipate uncertainty and adapt with itG.B. Dantzig (1955), R. J-B. Wets (1966)J.R. Birge and F. Louveaux (1997) Y. Censor and S.A. Zenios (1997)Parallel Optimization: Theory, Algorithms and Applications,Oxford University Press.S.A. Zenios and W.T. Ziemba (2006)Handbook of Asset and Liability Modeling, North-Holland.!

Page 13: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

13

Scenario tree"

0.013

0.015

0.017

0.019

0.021

0.023

0.025

0.027

0.029

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

Month

Inte

rest

rate

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.51 0.52 0.53 0.54 0.55 0.56 0.57 0.57 0.58 0.59 0.60 0.61 0.62 0.63 0.64 0.65 0.66 0.66 0.67 0.68 0.69 0.71

Exchange rate

Pro

ba

bil

ity

0.013

0.015

0.017

0.019

0.021

0.023

0.025

0.027

0.029

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

Month

Inte

rest

rate

0 T 1

Page 14: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

April 19, 2013 14

The PROMETEIA model:Integrate option pricing problem with asset allocation problem "

Page 15: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

15

The PROMETEIA model"

Page 16: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

16

The PROMETEIA model"

Page 17: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

April 19, 2013 17

Bonus Policies"

•  Italian policies:!

•  UK policies:!!

!

)))(,0max(1(1 gRgLL Pttt −++= − α

)1)(1( 11 −− ++= ttt RBgLL

reversionary bonus set at the discretion of the firm"

Page 18: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

18

Results for the Italian insurance industry"

•  Does it pay to integrate risk decisions? !

•  How far can the industry push its policies?!•  Design competitive policies

!•  23 stock indices and 3 bond indices (IT)!•  Stock and bond indices (UK, USA, JP)!•  Corporates (USA)!

Page 19: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

19

Are mean-variance portfolios efficient?"

0.004

0.005

0.006

0.007

0.008

0.009

0.01

0.011

0.012

0.013

0.006 0.011 0.016 0.021 0.026 0.031Standard deviation

Exp

eted

ret

urn

A

B

G

Page 20: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

20

Cost of guarantee and CEexROE of mean-variance portfolios "

0.06

0.065

0.07

0.075

0.08

0.035 0.037 0.039 0.041 0.043 0.045 0.047 0.049 0.051 0.053 0.055

Cost of min. guarantee

Ne

t C

Ee

xR

OE

G

A

B

H

Page 21: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

21

How far can the industry push its policies?Cost of min. guarantee vs net CEexROE "

0

0,02

0,04

0,06

0,08

0,1

0,12

0,14

0,16

0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1Cost of minimum guarantee

Ne

t C

Ee

xR

OE

m.g. = 0.01

m.g. = 0.04

m.g. = 0.07

m.g. = 0.12Mean-v ariance efficient portfolios for 4% minimum guarantee products

H

The v alue of the integrativ e modelfor 4% minimum guarantee products

Page 22: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

22

Comparisons with benchmark portfolios"

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16

80/20

Page 23: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

23

How far can the industry push its policies?Net CEexROE vs min. guarantee"

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.07

0.08

0.09 0.1

0.11

0.12

0.13

Minimum Guarantee

Net C

EexR

OE

UKItaly

Page 24: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

24

Shareholders vs Policyholders "

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

Cost of the Guarantee

Net C

EexR

OE

UKItaly

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1

Standard Deviation

Mea

n Re

turn

UKItaly

Shareholders"Policyholders"

Page 25: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

April 19, 2013 25

Web based financial services

Page 26: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

26

Page 27: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

27

Page 28: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

28

Argentinean 2001 debt restructuring!$81.8 billion!

!!

100,000 Italian pensioners !loose their pension !

Page 29: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

29

Collateralized Mortgage Obligations"

B

AA

AAA

AA Debt

First Loss Position

CDO

Page 30: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

NINJA loans

Region Total 3Q08 2Q08 1Q08 4Q07 3Q07

Worldwide 516,3 18,1 115,1 168,0 167,9 47,2

America 263,0 18,1 70,3 69,3 75,9 29,4

Europe 229,5 0,0 41,3 89,3 81,3 17,6

Asia 23,9 0,0 3,4 9,4 10,7 0,4

Loan write-offs in billions (DZ Bank research publication, 2008)

Total Mortgage Originations

(Billions)

Subprime Originations

(Billions)

Subprime Share in Total

Originations (% of dollar value)

Subprime Mortgage Backed

Securities (Billions)

Percent Subprime

Securitized (% of dollar value)

2001 $2 ,215 $190 8.6% $95 50.4%

2002 $2,885 $231 8.0% $121 52.7%

2003 $3,945 $335 8.5% $202 60.5%

2004 $2,920 $540 18.5% $401 74.3%

2005 $3,120 $625 20.0% $507 81.2%

2006 $2,980 $600 20.1% $483 80.5%

Page 31: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

The bubble

!

S&P/Case-Schiller Home Price Index

Page 32: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

European Stability Bonds"•  Blue bonds-red bonds!•  Debt redemption fund!!!!!!

32

Debt/GDP ratio"

Debt/GDP ratio"

Borrowing rate"

Borrowing rate"

Page 33: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

European Stability Bonds"•  Pool sovereign bonds and collateralize!

– European Safe Bonds –ESBies!– European Junior Bonds –EJBies!

•  ESBies have no country risk!•  ESBies create reserve currency!

•  Flight from EJBies to ESBies!

•  No EU institutional or Treaty arrangements!!!!!!

33

Page 34: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

European Stability Bonds"

Suspiciously similar to CMOs!!!!!! 34

Page 35: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

35

Discussion: can financial engineering destroy the financial system"

•  Ulrich Beck, 1992 -Risk society. !•  Anthony Giddens -Duality of structure !•  George Soros, 2008 -reflexivity of the markets!

•  Peter Bernstein 1996–Against the gods!

Page 36: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

•  Modeling errors –Fallibility!– Know within limits!– Uncertainty in data!

•  Modeling uncertainty in data!

•  Modeling success –Reflexivity!– Model creates uncertainty!– Uncertainty reflects back on model!

Discussion: can financial engineering destroy the financial system"

Page 37: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

•  Use reflexivity to make money!

•  Can destroy the system:!– LTCM!– Equitable Insurance!– Sub-prime crisis!

•  Reinhart and Rogoff excel error!

Discussion: can financial engineering destroy the financial system"

Page 38: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

Conclusion"

Financial engineering:""

Fertile Fallacy"

38

Page 39: Financial engineering  the nuclear option

•  Karl Marx !“Society poses itself only such problems

as it can solve” !•  John F. Kennedy

!“Our problems are man-made, ! therefore they can be solved by men”!

•  Stavros A. Zenios amendment !“Our problems are man-made, ! therefore they can be solved by women”!

Conclusion"