Upload
monster12
View
247
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
0
Investor Presentation
March 2010
1
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-looking Information
This presentation contains, and the Company may from time to time make, written or oral "forward-looking statements" within thesafe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigations Reform Act of 1995. These statements include information with respectto our financial condition and its results of operations and businesses. Words such as "anticipates," "expects," "intends," "plans,""believes," "seeks," "estimates," "may," "will," "continue," "project" and similar expressions, as well as statements in the futuretense, identify forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of our future performance and are subject to risks and uncertainties thatcould cause actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements. These risks anduncertainties include:
• The ability to obtain new contracts at attractive prices;
• The size and timing of customer orders;
• Fluctuations in customer demand;
• Competitive factors;
• The timely completion of contracts;
• The timing and size of expenditures;
• The timely receipt of government approvals and permits;
• The adequacy of local labor supplies at our facilities;
• The availability and cost of funds;
• General economic conditions, both domestically and abroad;
• The successful integration of acquisitions; and
• Fluctuations in foreign currencies.
The effects of these factors are difficult to predict. New factors emerge from time to time and we cannot assess the potentialimpact of any such factor on the business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause results to differmaterially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of its date and wedo not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date of suchstatement or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. In addition, see "Risk Factors" for a discussion of these and otherfactors.
You are encouraged to read the SEC reports of DMC, particularly its Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2010 formeaningful cautionary language disclosing why actual results may vary materially from those anticipated by management.
2
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-looking Information
Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Non-GAAP results used in this presentation are provided only as a supplement to the financial statements based on U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The non-GAAP financial information is provided to enhance the reader's understanding of
DMC’s financial performance, but no non-GAAP measure should be considered in isolation or as a substitute for financial measures
calculated in accordance with GAAP. Reconcil iations of the most directly comparable GAAP measures to non-GAAP measures are
provided within the schedules attached to this release.
EBITDA is defined as net income plus or minus net interest plus taxes, depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA excludes stock-
based compensation and, when appropriate, other items that management does not uti l ize in assessing DMC’s operating performance
(as further described in the attached financial schedules). None of these non-GAAP financial measures are recognized terms under
GAAP and do not purport to be an alternative to net income as an indicator of operating performance or any other GAAP measure.
Management uses these non-GAAP measures in its operational and financial decision-making, believing that it is useful to eliminate
certain items in order to focus on what it deems to be a more reliable indicator of ongoing operating performance and the company’s
abil ity to generate cash flow from operations. As a result, internal management reports used during monthly operating reviews feature
the adjusted EBITDA. Management also believes that investors may find non-GAAP financial measures useful for the same reasons,
although investors are cautioned that non-GAAP financial measures are not a substitute for GAAP disclosures. EBITDA and adjusted
EBITDA are also used by research analysts, investment bankers, and lenders to assess operating performance. For example, a measure
similar to EBITDA is required by the lenders under DMC’s credit facil ity.
Because not all companies use identical calculations, DMC’s presentation of non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to
other similarly-titled measures of other companies. However, these measures can sti l l be useful in evaluating the company’s
performance against its peer companies because management believes the measures provide users with valuable insight into key
components of GAAP financial disclosures. For example, a company with greater GAAP net income may not be as appealing to
investors if its net income is more heavily comprised of gains on asset sales. Likewise, eliminating the effects of interest income and
expense moderates the impact of a company's capital structure on its performance.
All of the items included in the reconcil iation from net income to EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are either (i) non-cash items (e.g.,
depreciation, amortization of purchased intangibles and stock-based compensation) or (i i) items that management does not consider to
be useful in assessing DMC’s operating performance (e.g., income taxes and gain on sale of assets). In the case of the non-cash items,
management believes that investors can better assess the company’s operating performance if the measures are presented without such
items because, unlike cash expenses, these adjustments do not affect DMC' abil ity to generate free cash flow or invest in its business. For
example, by adjusting for depreciation and amortization in computing EBITDA, users can compare operating performance without
regard to different accounting determinations such as useful l ife. In the case of the other items, management believes that investors can
better assess operating performance if the measures are presented without these items because their financial impact does not reflect
ongoing operating performance.
3
Key Data
Symbol:
52-week range:
Average daily trading volume (3 mo.):
Approx. market capitalization:
Shares outstanding:
Approximate float:
Fiscal year end:
2009 revenue:
2009 EPS:
2009 EBITDA:
2009 operating cash flow:
Cash (12/31/09):
Quarterly dividend:
NASDAQ GS: BOOM
$8.50 - $23.17
173,416
$202 million
13 million
12.3 million
December 31
$164.9 million
$0.66
$26.8 million
$29.5 million
$22.4 million
$0.04
(As of 3/26/10)
4
! Yvon Pierre Cariou - President and CEO
! Richard A. Santa - Sr. Vice President,
CFO and Secretary
! John G. Banker - Sr. Vice President,
Customers and Technology
! Rolf Rospek - CEO, DYNAenergetics and
Oilfield Products segment
Executive Management
5
Company Overview
• World’s dominant provider of explosion-welded clad metal plates
- Diversified customer base in 8 primary end markets
- Significant barriers to entry
- International network of production and sales facilities
- $50 million order backlog at end of 2009
• Three business segments provide diversified revenue streams
• Strong operating cash flow and balance sheet
• Low Cap Ex business model facilitates strong free cash flow
• Talented management with deep industry experience
• Long-term growth strategy
6
Financial Highlights
In millionsNet SalesNet Sales
In millions
Operating IncomeOperating Income
In millions
7
Financial Highlights
In millions
Net IncomeNet Income Diluted EPSDiluted EPS
In millions
$24.6 $2.00
8
Business Segments
Explosive MetalworkingExplosive Metalworking Oilfield ProductsOilfield Products AMK WeldingAMK Welding
$ 9.0 Million$ 9.0 Million$134.1 Million$134.1 Million $ 21.8 Million$ 21.8 Million
2009 Revenue by Segment
9
DMC’s Global Presence
Corporate Headquarters
Explosion Welding production centers
Explosion Welding sales offices and agents
Oilfield Products Headquarters
Oilfield Products subsidiaries
Oilfield Products sales agents
10
DMC 2009 Revenue by Region
North America
47%Europe
23%Asia
17%
Russia
5%
Australia
2%
Other Countries -– 6%
11
Competing Cladding Technologies
Weld OverlayRollbond
• Performed by small
group of international
hot rolling steel mills
• Thickness niche is
generally 2” and less
• Compatible metals
only
Explosion Weld
• Performed by small field of
international competitors led by
Dynamic Materials Corporation
• Most versatile cladding technology
• Only cladding process that can
address both compatible and non-
compatible metals
• Thickness sweet-spot is 1” to 6”
• Arc-welding process
typically performed
by metal fabricators
• Thickness niche is
generally 6” and
greater
• Compatible metals
only
Explosive MetalworkingExplosive Metalworking
12
Key Demand Drivers for Explosion Welded Plates
Explosive MetalworkingExplosive Metalworking
CorrosionCorrosion
IndustrialIndustrial
CAPEXCAPEX
13Explosive MetalworkingExplosive Metalworking
Explosion Clad - a Critical Weapon in the Battle Against Rust
! “…a major industry challengeis the ‘rust crisis’ in the globalenergy infrastructure”
! “Worldwide energyinfrastructure too old”
! Most infrastructure “farbeyond original design life”
From presentation at 2009 Offshore Technology Conference
Matthew Simmons, Chairman - Simmons & Company International
14Explosive MetalworkingExplosive Metalworking
Explosion Welding – a Key Step in Pre-fabrication Process
Metal SuppliersMetal SuppliersExplosion Explosion
WeldingWelding FabricatorsFabricators
End UsersEnd Users
MILLS & SERVICE CENTERS
Sourced Metals
• Carbon Steel
• Nickel Alloys
• Titanium
• Zirconium
15Explosive MetalworkingExplosive Metalworking
Selected End Markets Served by Explosion Welding
• Oil & Gas industry
• Petrochemicals / chemicals
• Alternative energy
Corrosion
Transition Joints
• Aluminum production
• Power generation
• Hydrometallurgy
• Industrial refrigeration
• Shipbuilding
Above are several of the many industries that rely on explosion weldingAbove are several of the many industries that rely on explosion welding
16Explosive MetalworkingExplosive Metalworking
End UsersChemicals Refinery Mining Engineering
Fabricators
Morimatsu Group China
End Users Include Leading Players in Respective Fields
17Explosive MetalworkingExplosive Metalworking
DMC’s Dominant Industry Position Protected by SignificantBarriers to Entry
"" Global network of specialty-metals suppliersGlobal network of specialty-metals suppliers
"" Permits and shooting sites in U.S., France, Sweden & GermanyPermits and shooting sites in U.S., France, Sweden & Germany
"" Mastery of explosion-welding process in large-scale productionMastery of explosion-welding process in large-scale production
"" Strong working relationships with end-market customersStrong working relationships with end-market customers
18Oilfield ProductsOilfield Products
Oilfield Products Segment
• Manufactures explosive perforatingsystems and seismic devices for theinternational oil & gas services industry
• Growing presence in criticalinternational energy markets
• Recognized within industry for productand technology innovation
• Extension of DMC’s expertise inspecialized explosive manufacturingprocesses
• Generated 13% of DMC sales in 2009
19Oilfield ProductsOilfield Products
Explosive Perforating
The Perforation Process
1. After a wellbore is drilled and the
cement casing is in place, a
perforating gun is deployed into
the well
2. The gun is fired, sending steel
projectiles through the casing and
into the surrounding formation
creating “perforation tunnels”
3. Oil or gas flows through
perforation tunnels and into the
well
20
Financial Performance Review
1 1 Before discontinued operationsBefore discontinued operations
($mm)
2006
2007
2008
2009
Sales $113.5 $165.2 $232.6 $164.9
% growth 43% 46% 41% (31%)
Gross profit $42.0 $55.0 $70.8 $43.1
% margin 37% 33% 30% 26%
Operating profit $30.1 $38.9 $38.1 $16.2
% margin 27% 24% 16% 10%
Adjusted EBITDA $32.1 $43.5 $53.2 $26.8
% growth 86% 36% 22% (47%)
Net income1 $19.3 $24.6 $24.1 $8.5
% growth 86% 28% (2%) (65%)
EPS1 ($) $1.58 $2.00 $1.91 $0.66
% growth 84% 27% (5%) (65%)
21
Balance Sheet Highlights
Assets
Cash, cash equivalents & restricted cash $ 9,416 $ 14,360 $ 22,411
Accounts receivables, net of allowance $ 39,833 $ 34,719 $ 25,807
Total current assets $ 94,730 $ 91,049 $ 87,974
Total assets $ 240,899 $ 229,586 $ 225,176
Liabilities
Total current liabilities $ 58,818 $ 45,747 $ 42,135
Long-term debt $ 61,530 $ 46,178 $ 34,120
Total liabilities $ 142,620 $ 111,084 $ 93,065
Total stockholders’ equity $ 98,279 $ 118,502 $ 132,111
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 240,899 $ 229,586 $ 225,176
2007 2008 2009
(In thousands)
22
Supplemental Information
23
Sales and Explosion Welding Backlog Progression:Q1 2004 – Q4 2009
In millions
24Explosive MetalworkingExplosive Metalworking
Capital Expenditures
(in millions)(in millions)
ActualActual ForecastForecast
25
Progression of Adjusted EBITDA & Net Income
(In millions)
26
Thank you.