What’s our stack:process, technology, community and ideas for the future of ATIP
Government&
Public Policy
Data&
Software
Negotiation&
Strategy
8
key points1. new expectations2. ATIP is technology dependent3. stack = process4. ideas
<1>New Expectations
30 milliseconds
30 milliseconds
vs.
4 months
"The Net interprets censorship as
damage and routes around it."
“Citizens interprets delay as damage..."
is ATIP the solution, or the
problem?
<2>ATIP is
technologydependent
history
1766 - Sweden
1766 - Sweden
1966 - United States
1766 - Sweden
1966 - United States
1974 - United States (Privacy Amendments)
1978 - France
1977 - Mexico
1970 - Norway
1766 - Sweden
1966 - United States
1982 - Canada, New Zealand & Australia
1974 - United States (Privacy Amendments)
1978 - France
1977 - Mexico
1970 - Norway
1985 - Denmark
1980 - Netherlands
1766 - Sweden
1966 - United States
1982 - Canada, New Zealand & Australia
1974 - United States (Privacy Amendments)
2000 - United Kingdom
1978 - France
1977 - Mexico
1970 - Norway
1985 - Denmark
1980 - Netherlands
1998 - South Korea & Belize
1993 - Belgium
1991 - Brazil
1998 - Ireland
why?
1966 - United States
1982 - Canada, New Zealand & Australia
1974 - United States (Privacy Amendments)
2000 - United Kingdom
1978 - France
1977 - Mexico
1985 - Denmark
1980 - Netherlands
1998 - South Korea & Belize
1993 - Belgium
1991 - Brazil
1998 - Ireland
1966 - United States
1970 - Norway
progressive coalitions
political/trust crisis
best practice
1966 - United States
1982 - Canada, NZ & Australia
1974 - US(Privacy Amendments)
2000 - United Kingdom
1978 - France
1977 - Mexico
1970 - Norway
1985 - Denmark
1980 - Netherlands
1998 - South Korea & Belize
1993 - Belgium
1991 - Brazil
1998 - Ireland
1960 - Xerox 914 copier
1966 - United States
1982 - Canada, NZ & Australia
1974 - US(Privacy Amendments)
2000 - United Kingdom
1978 - France
1977 - Mexico
1970 - Norway
1985 - Denmark
1980 - Netherlands
1998 - South Korea & Belize
1993 - Belgium
1991 - Brazil
1998 - Ireland
*50-59 revenue = $12M
1960 - Xerox 914 copier
1968 - $1B in sales
1966 - United States
1982 - Canada, NZ & Australia
1974 - US(Privacy Amendments)
2000 - United Kingdom
1978 - France
1977 - Mexico
1970 - Norway
1985 - Denmark
1980 - Netherlands
1998 - South Korea & Belize
1993 - Belgium
1991 - Brazil
1998 - Ireland
1960 - Xerox 914 copier
1968 - $1B in sales1969 - largest 100 companies1970 - $1.6B in sales
1966 - United States
1982 - Canada, NZ & Australia
1974 - US(Privacy Amendments)
2000 - United Kingdom
1978 - France
1977 - Mexico
1970 - Norway
1985 - Denmark
1980 - Netherlands
1998 - South Korea & Belize
1993 - Belgium
1991 - Brazil
1998 - Ireland
1980 - $8B in sales ~60% market share
1960 - Xerox 914 copier
1968 - $1B in sales1969 - largest 100 companies1970 - $1.6B in sales
ATIPis predicated
on the existenceof copiers
why it matters
<3>technology
shapes process
values driven
technology agnostic
values driven
technology agnostic
ATIP/FOIA
built on a set ofassumptions
ATIP/FOIA
built on a stack
technology stack
commissioners
live
in a world ofprocess
ATIP PROCESS
BLACK BOX
POLITICAL/SECURITY ASSESSMENTDISTRIBUTION
INVESTIGATIONS
ATIP PROCESS
BLACK BOX
POLITICAL/SECURITY ASSESSMENTDISTRIBUTION
INVESTIGATIONS
software
software is process
control the software
control the process
influence the software
influence the process
ATIP PROCESS
BLACK BOX
POLITICAL/SECURITY ASSESSMENTDISTRIBUTION
INVESTIGATIONS
PROCUREMENTOPEN BY DEFAULTEASY TO ACCESS
Rules, Processes
& Culture
ATIP PROCESS
BLACK BOX
POLITICAL/SECURITY ASSESSMENTDISTRIBUTION
INVESTIGATIONS
PROCUREMENTOPEN BY DEFAULTEASY TO ACCESS
Rules, Processes
& Culture
report about this
sometimes comment on this
write about this
auditing
booksto
spreadsheetsto
systems
auditing
booksto
spreadsheetsto
systems
auditing
booksto
spreadsheetsto
systems
<4>ideas
1. help define standards for procurement
ATIP PROCESS
BLACK BOX
POLITICAL/SECURITY ASSESSMENTDISTRIBUTION
INVESTIGATIONS
PROCUREMENTOPEN BY DEFAULTEASY TO ACCESS
Rules, Processes
& Culture
understand our assumptions
actpoliciesstandards
open data as pre-approved
systems
why not for some document creation
processes?
why not for some document creation
processes?
procurementbuyandsell.gc.ca
2. Create your open data on response
times
build power
64
3. open data
assess openness of data
especially regulatory data
Wonderful Case Study • 2006-2012 spills• $4000• eventually 711 pages of printed records ($262)
• months to convert• run around• Energy Resources Conservation Board ($367)
• Alberta Township System not Lat/Long ($1000 to convert)
3. there is an opportunity for a
broader tent
not just governmentnot just reporters
hello!:programmers/developersarchivistslibrariansbloggers
CIOstechnologists
access gov20
access gov20
accountability leverage
find commoninterests
speedreliabilitypersistence
accountabilityleverage
accessibility
We need a new act
- eliminates the joke of access summaries
-respects today’s expectations of access
- compels government to rethink how it creates and manages documents and data
- makes new assumptions about the stack it is on, and what the stack SHOULD be.
@[email protected] www.eaves.ca
This work is copyrighted using Creative Commons Attribution 2.5
You may share and remix this work on the condition that you attribute the work to its
original author.
ATIP PROCESS
STORAGE/ARCHIVE
INTERNAL USAGE
DOCUMENT CREATION
PROCUREMENT
POLITICAL/SECURITY ASSESSMENTDISTRIBUTION
HARD DRIVESARCHIVES
POLITICAL/SECURITY ASSESSMENTEMAIL
ATIP PROCESS
STORAGE/ARCHIVE
INTERNAL USAGE
DOCUMENT CREATION
PROCUREMENT