VC Course Complexity
Policy problems in environment & sustainability
Steve DoversFenner School of Environment &
Society21 May 2013
Complexity Dovers 2013 2
Context & coverage• Many definitions of complexity, wicked
problems … not repeating those -- you decide what’s complex or not.
• Policy problems and institutional challenges as manifest in a particular policy domain:-- history and broad nature of the domain.-- problem attributes.-- the hard edge of policy and complex problem – choosing a policy instrument.
• If time – an example and exercise.
Complexity Dovers 2013 3
Sources:
• Supplied (or will be…):- Dovers et al 2008 in Bammer & Smithson.- Dovers 2009 in Glob.Env Change.
• Other:- Connor, R. and Dovers, S. 2004. Institutional change for sustainable development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.- Dovers, S. 2005. Environment and sustainability policy. Sydney: Federation Press.- Handmer, J. and Dovers, S. 2013. Handbook of disaster policy and institutions. 2nd edition. London: Earthscan.
Complexity Dovers 2013 4
Environment & resource management
sustainability & sustainable development
A summary
-- familiar to some, others not --
Complexity Dovers 2013 5
Beyond end-of-pipe: Increasing complexity in problem-framing and policy responses
• From: single environmental problems, point-source pollution control, nature conservation, single stock resource management.
• Through: multiple, bigger, more complex environmental and resource management problems.
• Toward: sustainability – environment and development, linked ecological, social & economic agenda.
• Still struggling with enlarging environmental agenda, while grappling with emerging sust problems.
• AND, DECISIONS REQUIRED NOW.
Complexity Dovers 2013 6
Examples …
• From soil conservation integrated catchment management - regional governance
• From point-source pollution regulation load-based licensing Env Management Systems, triple-bottom-line accounting managing multiple diffuse sources.
• From tree preservation land clearance controls regional vegn plans stewardship payments.
• From an EPA and a parks services environment depts strategic assessment and sustainability policy units.
• From scattered nature reserves patches and strips managing biodiversity across tenures and landscapes (connectivity conservation).
Complexity Dovers 2013 7
Defining sustainability (Rio +20)
• Sustainability: a system property, or a long term goal.
• Sustainable development: an evolving policy agenda.
• Brundtland (WCED 1987):
Sustainable development is development which meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. It contains within it two key concepts: -- the concept of ‘needs’, in particular the essential needs of the world’s poor, to which overriding priority should be given; and-- the idea of limitations imposed by the state of technology and social organization on the environment’s ability to meet present and future needs.
• Long time scales, local-global links, interconnected phenomena, significant uncertainty, high stakes= complex, wicked problems?
Complexity Dovers 2013 8
Constituent issue of sustainable development: 1. Issues of resource depletion and degradation, over
many centuries, esp C19-20th: -- loss of biological diversity; land and water resources; forests; energy; minerals; amenity.
2. Issues of pollution and wastes, from 17th century, but big from the 1960s:-- atmospheric, marine and water pollution;
3. Issues of ecological life support services, from 1980s:-- ecosystem integrity; nutrient cycles; climate change; integrity of evolutionary processes.
4. Issues of society and human condition, esp 1960-70s:-- population; development/poverty; food security; shelter; health; urbanization; human rights; education; trade; security.
• Sustainability = 1 & 2, plus 3 & 4 – 1987/92 – 2012 @ Rio.
The global discourse…
• 1966: Boulding’s “Spaceship Earth” essay – modern idea of sustainability.
• 1972: Stockholm conference on human environment, and Limits to Growth.
• 1970-80s: Brandt and Palme UN commissions on development/poverty and human security/peace.
• 1980: World Conservation Strategy.• 1983-87: Our Common Future – WCED/Brundtland
– environment and development, security.• 1992 in Rio: UNCED – 2002 Rio+10 – 2012
Rio+20…• Sust development – the biggest agenda ever…
Complexity Dovers 2013 9
Complexity Dovers 2013 10
Rise and fall of sustainable development: resisting complexity?• Too vague, messy, inherent tensions, not suited
to specialised approaches, too far off (are we there yet…?)
• Higher-order social goal – akin to democracy, justice, rule of law – a generational task for research, policy and institutional change.
• Fragmented knowledge, institutional settings and policy responses caused the problems, and no other candidate for an integrative framework.
• EG: Australia 1992 ESD Strategy (for Rio), versus Australia 2002 (at J’burg) focus on selected issues.
• Huge agenda re-affirmed at Rio +20.
Complexity Dovers 2013 11
Resisting complexity: other examples
• Land degradation 1980s (aka desertification) = multiple forms of soil erosion, irrigation and dryland salinity, rangeland vegetation decline, soil structural decline, soil acidification…-- almost total focus on dryland salinity in 1990s.
• Instream water use (1980s) = ecological, geomorphic integrity, aesthetic, cultural, recreational..-- to strictly environmental (ecological) flows in 1990s.
• Carbon pricing (2009-13) = a “great big new tax”.
More focused, or resisting complexity? Can we only twiddle one knob at a time?
Complexity Dovers 2013 12
If these problems are complex…
… ie need to understand and manage many, interconnecting factors and
processes)…
… then the research and policy challenge is by definition different in kind, if not in degree, than many other domains?
… but, why?
Complexity Dovers 2013 13
Attributes of policy problems in sustainability
1: extended spatial and temporal scales.2: possible ecological limits to human activities.
3: irreversible and/or cumulative impacts.4: cross-problem connectivity.
5: pervasive risk and uncertainty.7: poor information base.
6: important assets not traded and thus not valued.8: new ethical dimensions (other species, future).
9: systemic problem causes.10: poorly developed theory, methods, techniques.
11: poorly defined policy and property rights.12: non-existent or ill-fitting institutional settings.
13: demands for integration of knowledge silos.14: novelty as a policy and institutional domain.
Attributes = complexity?
Complexity Dovers 2013 14
Sustainability problems: different in kind and degree?
• Such attributes confronted more often, and more often in combination, with major sustainability problems, than in most other policy sectors.
• … problems different in kind, and some would argue different in degree as well.
• Traditional policy-oriented disciplines, and policy processes, unlikely to have purchase.
So…
• Human behaviours and use of environments and resources are unsustainable.
• How to change this?
Complexity Dovers 2013 15
“Oughtism”
• Someone oughta do something about…-- over allocated water resources-- climate change-- degraded environments = degraded livelihoods-- decline of oceanic fisheries-- biodiversity conservation-- energy dependency and car reliance-- etc, etc…
• That’s policy instrument choice – “don’t tell me the problem, tell me how to fix it with a policy response”.
an exercise on this later.
Complexity Dovers 2013 16
Complexity Dovers 2013 17
The politics of instrument choice
• A policy initiative involves specific tools to achieve its goals.
• Policy interventions use policy instruments to drive behaviour change, of individuals, households, firms, communities, sectors, govts.
social engineering?• Policy instrument choice = convenience,
disciplinary bias, ease, swiftness, or familiarity
• ‘Policy fashions’ evident -- past experience, political preferences, dominant ideologies.
• Often from a limited menu – sometimes inevitably, sometimes regrettably.
Complexity Dovers 2013 18
Beyond simplistic debates:
• Three commonly advocated approaches:- sticks – regulate with law- sermons – educate the public- carrots – create a market or price.
• Often, policy debates focus on arguing which is ‘best’, in a general sense.
Complexity Dovers 2013 19
… and limited choices
• 3 problems with such arguments…
• Almost always use a combination of instruments, hopefully coordinated.
• There are more than just regulatory, educative and market mechanisms
• Within such general classes, there are options.
how to create a menu, and how to choose?
Complexity Dovers 2013 20
Instrument classes (from 3 15)• R&D, monitoring• Communication &
information flow• Education &
training• Consultation,
mediation• Agreements,
conventions• Statute law• Common law
• Covenants on property
• Assessment (eg. EIA)• Self-regulation• Community
involvement• Market mechanisms• Institutional change• Change other
policies• Inaction (with cause)
Complexity Dovers 2013 21
But wait, there’s more…
• This menu is richer and more realistic, but still too simple - each class contains a variety of specific instruments.
• Not always possible to consider all, but important to recognise the range.
• Some examples of more detail …
Complexity Dovers 2013 22
Instrument menu, level 2
• Education and training:• Public education (“moral suasion”) • Targeted education (subset of popn)• Formal education (schools, tertiary)• Training (skills development)• Education about ‘the environment’,
education about other instruments.
Complexity Dovers 2013 23
… level 2, continued
• Statute law (legislation) - new law or regulations under existing statute, to:
• Create institutions and organisations• Set out statutory objects and agency roles• Define decision making processes• Allow public participation• Set aside land; plan and control the use of land• Enforce standards, prohibit practices• Require product labeling• Enable other instruments.
Complexity Dovers 2013 24
... level 2, continued
• Market mechanisms (price instruments):
• Input or output taxes or charges• Use charges• Subsidies, rebates• Tradable pollution permits, resource
rights• Performance assurance bonds• Deposit-refund systems.
… general classes = different options
Complexity Dovers 2013 25
Selection criteria: how to choose?• Effectiveness
criteria:• Information
requirements• Dependability• Timing• Corrective effect• Flexibility• Cost, efficiency• Cross-sectoral
impacts.
• Implementation criteria:
• Equity impacts• Political feasibility• Legal feasibility• Institutional feasibility• Monitoring
requirements• Compliance• Communicability.
Complexity Dovers 2013 26
EXAMPLE EXERCISE: Paddock trees• Scattered or paddock trees – icons of Australian
art, landscape and identity, covering vast areas.• Much more significant than thought – stock
shelter, water infiltration, pest control (predators), wildlife.
• Previous focus on patches and strips for vegetation protection and restoration – another increase in scale/complexity of the biodiversity policy problem.
• Demographic collapse – relicts of pre-clearing and grazing, low or nil recruitment – treeless in 50 years?
• Across whole grazing landscape…• Complex as (i) a research problem, and (ii) a
target for policy interventions? Variables – site variation, grazing regime, different species, financial viability of farm, owner demographic, information availability…
Complexity Dovers 2013 27
Familiar…?
As a policy problem…
• A big problem (biodiversity loss over millions of hectares, long term), requiring a policy response to increase appropriate management practices over 1000s of different, individual properties and owners:
policy choice for a complex problem.
Complexity Dovers 2013 28
Complexity Dovers 2013 29
As a research problem: Fenner CERF project
Go to…
• Sustainable Farms research project website, with details, publications, and cool 100 year landscape visualisation scenario download…
• http://fennerschool-research.anu.edu.au/sustfarms/
• (Finalist, 2011 Eureka Science Prizes). Complexity Dovers 2013 30
Further sources
• Fischer, J. et al. 2009. Reversing a tree regeneration crisis in an endangered ecoregion, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 106 (25): 10386-10391.
• Schirmer, J., Dovers, S. and Clayton, H. 2012. Informing conservation policy through an examination of landholder preferences: a case study of scattered tree conservation in Australia. Biological Conservation. 153: 51-63.
Complexity Dovers 2013 31
Complexity Dovers 2013 32
Findings…
• Re-affirmed value of scattered trees (prodn, birds, bats..).• Recruitment under low fertiliser, fast-rotation grazing
regimes, if seed stock available, but other strategies also needed.
• Majority of landholders value scattered trees, but do not currently manage for recruitment or retention.
• Demographics – superannuation farming, low succession.• Land use change – increased cropping (=removal of
obstacles to tillage and irrigation).• Need to deal with varied biophysical situations, different
financial situations, range of management regimes, attitudes to management, etc – farmer aren’t farmers.
• Variable receptivity to policy instruments.
Complexity Dovers 2013 33
As a target for policy intervention
• What are the policy options to change behaviours (management) of landholders?
with scarce resources, fragmented responsibilities, information overload, diverse audiences, existing programs and focus – what priority ‘investments’, in what combination?
Exercise:
• Four groups – policy instrument choice:
1. Landholders/farmers (who value trees but need to survive financially).2. Cwlth govt (design and fund policy).3. State/CMA (advise and implement).4. Conservation NGO (priority = biodiversity).
• 5-10min, then a proposal from each group.
Complexity Dovers 2013 34