US Army Corps of Engineers
BUILDING STRONG®
Mark Twain Lake Water Control Manual Update
Joan Stemler
St. Louis District Water Control
BUILDING STRONG®
2008 Event Overview Record flood event in July/August
►Pool = 640.4 NGVD►Outflow = 54,000 cfs
Funding was provided to update the Water Control Manual (WCM)►WCM was over due to be updated
Additional items funded►Updated Tailwater Rating Curve►Inundation Mapping for various flow scenarios►Updated Hydrology
BUILDING STRONG®
The Goal Reduce pool elevations without increasing
downstream flooding while enhancing other project purposes►Flood Control►Hydropower►Recreation►Fish and Wildlife►Water Supply
BUILDING STRONG®
Process Solicit input from the stakeholders, emergency
responders, and the public (6 meetings) Present alternatives to be analyzed (5 meetings) Analyze the alternatives (>150 alternatives) Present findings and propose a preferred operating
plan and take comments (9 meetings) Respond to comments and concerns (7 meetings) “Official” 30 day comment period Send draft WCM for Division approval
BUILDING STRONG®
Alternatives
BUILDING STRONG®
Crop Season Release Alternatives Change Crop Release Restriction to (Max releases are
based on downstream conditions):► 8,000 ► 10,000► 12,000
Graduated Scales► Max release: 8,000 at elevation 618.0 and is increased as
elevation increases to max 14,000 at elevation 638.0 (No Miss River restriction)
► When Miss River in flood, max 2,000 at <609.0 increasing to equivalent 24-hr generation at 621.0 (approximately 8,000). Max releases are based on downstream conditions
► When Miss River is not in flood and in crop season, sliding scale for max discharge 6,000 at <606.0 and 12,000 at 624.8. Max releases are based on downstream conditions
BUILDING STRONG®
Mississippi River Release Alternatives Release ahead of the Mississippi River crest and cut
24 hours prior to the crest Remove the Mississippi River restrictions Change the pool elevation where the Mississippi
River is no longer operated for from 624.8 to:► 615.0► 618.0► 620.0
Change the Mississippi River release restriction from 2,000 to 6,000
Raise the Mississippi River stage restriction:► Plus 5 feet► Plus 3 feet
BUILDING STRONG®
Maximum Release Alternatives
For pool elevations above 630.0 release:►14,000►24,000
For pool elevations above 620.0 release 75% of inflow
BUILDING STRONG®
Surcharge Regulation If pool elevation is forecasted to reach
surcharge (water on the ground), the max discharge may be preempted increased to discharge called for on the surcharge curve for that given elevation and inflow.
Recession side of Surcharge - Target 1 to 2 foot fall per day not to exceed previous max event release until pool elevation:
► 630.0► 620.0► 615.0
BUILDING STRONG®
Winter Drawdown and/or Guide Curve Change
Season Guide Curve Nov thru March►600.0
Other Alternatives Analyzed►Season Guide Curve Nov thru March
• 520.0 (Bottom of Reservoir)
►Year Round Guide Curve• 589.0 (Bottom of Hydropower Pool is 592.0)
BUILDING STRONG®
Fish Spawn Alternatives
Fish Spawn Pool Elevations:►606 thru 620
BUILDING STRONG®
Summary of Proposed Changes
Crop Release Restriction►Increased from 6,000 to 10,000
• Releases are based upon downstream conditions
Mississippi River Release Restrictions:►Max Release – when Louisiana or St. Louis is at or
forecasted to be at or above flood stage and not on the recession side of the hydrograph:• Pool Elevation lowered from 624.8 to 615.0• Increased from 2,000 to 6,000• Cut to 2,000 24hr prior to crest• Releases are based upon downstream conditions
BUILDING STRONG®
Summary of Proposed Changes
Surcharge►Max Release:
• If pool elevation is forecasted to reach surcharge (water on the ground), the max discharge may be preempted increased to discharge called for on the surcharge curve for that given elevation and inflow.
• Recession side of Surcharge - Target 1 to 2 foot fall per day not to exceed previous max event release until pool elevation 620.0
Fish Spawn►Start date changed from May 1st to April 23rd ►Pool Elevation at or below 610.0
BUILDING STRONG®
Proposed Plan vs Current Plan
BUILDING STRONG®
1993ActualProposed
Elev Diff (ft)
Actual 636.8 -
Proposed 629.6 -7.2
BUILDING STRONG®
2008ActualProposed
Elev Diff (ft) Flow Diff (cfs)
Actual 640.4 - 54,000 -
Proposed 638.7 -1.7 25,910 -28,090
BUILDING STRONG®
Deviation 2010
ActualWCM
Elev Diff (ft)
WCM 636.0 -
Actual 630.2 -6.2
BUILDING STRONG®
NEPA National Environmental Policy Act
BUILDING STRONG®
30 Day NEPA Review Period
The EA will be distributed to all interested parties►Includes all attendees of public meetings that
provided an address All interested parties are given 30 days to
review the environmental assessment and provide comments
BUILDING STRONG®
30 Day Review Period Continued
All comments received will be addressed on an individual basis, including any new or ongoing concerns
Such comments will be incorporated into the Environmental Assessment
A “Finding of No Significant Impact”, signed by the St. Louis District’s Commander, concludes the NEPA process assuming the public review results in a determination of no significant impact to the human environment
BUILDING STRONG®
Questions or Comments about NEPA?
NEPA ContactBrandon M. Schneider
Environmental Compliance Section
Planning and Environmental Branch (CEMVS-PD-E)
St. Louis District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
1222 Spruce Street
St. Louis, Mo 63103-2833
PH: 314-331-8496
EA will be posted athttp://www.mvs.usace.army.mil/pm/EAreports.html
BUILDING STRONG®
Approval Process for Revision of Water Control Plan
“Finding of No Significant Impact” from NEPA process is required
Review and approval of plan from Mississippi Valley Division (Vicksburg, MS) is required.
BUILDING STRONG®
? ? ? Questions ? ? ?