Transcript

Unconditional CopyrightRemoving the Camouflage

Denise Troll CoveyPrincipal Librarian for Special Projects

Erin RhodesCopyright Permission Assistant

Presentation to ALA LobbyistsNovember 15, 2005

“Unconditional Copyright”

• No registration

• No renewal

– Fewer than 15% of copyrights were renewed

when renewal was required

• No circumvention

– Even if technologies or licenses disallow public rights

• “Limited” duration

– Published = 95 years or author +70

– Unpublished = 120 years

U.S. Copyright Camouflage

• Difficult to determine copyright status & ownership

– Copyright laws are complex

– Office of Copyright keeps no records of ownership

– Publisher records are not complete or easily accessible

• Estimate 92% of books ever published

are still in copyright, but out of print

– No revenue for copyright owners

– No easy access for potential readers

• Seeking non-exclusive permission to digitize

& provide open access to copyrighted books

1999–2001 Feasibility study

2002–2003 Posner study

2003–2004 Million book project

Research

Feasibility Study 1999 – 2001

• 368 random books in the library catalog

• 95% (351) were copyright protected

• 21% (76) were eliminated from the study

– Mistakenly cataloged as books (10%)

– Third-party copyright ownership (11%)

• Final sample was 277 titles

(209 publishers)

Feasibility Study

• Intermittent labor – 4 different people

• Process

– Initial request letters – sent 278

– Follow-up request letters – sent 246

• Over 60% of publishers received 2nd or 3rd letter

• Subsequent letters sent months later

• Did not track transaction costs

Permission granted

Permission denied

No response

Not located

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Titles

19%

27%

30%

24%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Publishers

21%

28%

23%

27%

• Mistakenly requested permission for 4 out of copyright books

• 1 permission granted; 3 denied•

• Data NOT included in graph

Overall Results

Permission granted

Permission denied

No response

78% publishers contacted

(81% of the titles)

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Titles

34%

37%

30%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Publishers

36%

30%

35%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Titles

55%

45%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Publishers

46%

54%

51% publishers responded

(53% of the titles)

Average 101 days for permission granted

Average 124 days for permission denied

Permission grantedRestrictions applied to 68% of titles

Permission denied

Restrictions Applied

• 54% access restricted to Carnegie Mellon users

• 23% display full citation

• 22% no 3rd party material

• 15% provide copy

• 15% not for sale

• 8% license to provide access expires

• 6% fee required

• 6% individual use only

• 3% permission to scan expires

Analysis by Print Status

• 73% sample was out of print books – More difficult to locate, less likely to respond,

but more likely to grant permission if they responded

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Samplecontent

Notlocated

Responserate

Successrate

In print

Out of print

Response rate based on contacts

Success rate based on responses

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Samplecontent

Notlocated

Responserate

Successrate

Domestic

Foreign

• 19% sample was foreign publications – Difficult to locate, but more likely to grant permission

Analysis by Publisher Location

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Samplecontent

Notlocated

Responserate

Successrate

Scholarly associations

University presses

Commercial publishers

Museums & galleries

Analysis by Publisher Type

• 68% sample was published by commercial publisher– Most difficult to locate, least likely to respond

& least likely to grant permission

Conclusions

• It is possible to secure copyright permission

to digitize & provide open access to books

• Future studies

– Use dedicated labor

– Track transaction costs

– Experiment to increase response & success rates

– Improve data management

Posner Project 2002 – 2003

• 1106 fine & rare volumes in the Posner Collection

• 26% (284) were copyright protected

(104 publishers)

• Associated archival documents

– Correspondence

– Newspaper clippings

– Book catalogs

• Initially intermittent labor – one person

– Sent 60 letters, but did no follow up

• Dedicated labor May through Oct 2003

• Process

– Initial request letter – sent 174

– Follow up phone calls or email – 159

• Tracked transaction costs

Posner Project 2002 – 2003

Still negotiating

Permission granted

Permission denied

No response

Not located

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Titles

5%13%

20%

61%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Publishers

31%

5%

18%

43%

1% 3%

• Mistakenly requested permission for 74 out of copyright books

• All granted permission

• Data NOT included in graph

Overall Results

69% publishers contacted

(87% of the titles)

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Titles

6%

23%

71%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Publishers

7%

28%

65%

Permission granted

Permission denied

No response

Permission grantedRestrictions applied to 29% of titles

Permission denied

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Titles

25%

75%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Publishers

30%

70%

64% publishers responded

(82% of the titles)

Comparative Results

Feasibility (titles)

Posner (titles)

Posner (publishers)

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Notlocated

Responserate

Successrate

66%

45%

93%

75%

Response rate based on contacts

Success rate based on responses

Comparative Analysis of Restrictions

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Providecopy

CarnegieMellon only

Displaycitation

Individualuse

Englishonly

No 3rdparty

Not for sale Permissionto scanexpires

License toprovideaccessexpires

Feerequired

Posner study

Feasibility study

• Revised, more informative letter

• Prompt follow up calls or email

• The age & nature of the Posner Collection

• Copyright holders could see

the quality of the work on the web

Attribute Increased Success

Analysis by Print Status

• Not yet done

• Issue learned from Million Book Project

– Librarians consider book to be out of print

if exact work is no longer available in print

– Publishers consider book to be out of print

if no newer edition is available in print

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Collectioncontent

Notlocated

Responserate

Successrate

Domestic

Foreign

Analysis by Publisher Location

• 29% content was foreign publications– More difficult to locate, & slightly less likely to respond

or to grant permission

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Samplecontent

Noaddress

Responserate

Successrate

Analysis by Publisher Type

Scholarly assoc.

University press

Commercial

Authors & estates

Special publishers

Unknown

• Special publishers are most likely, commercial publishers least likely to grant permission

• Authors & estates or units unknown own most of the content – difficult or impossible to locate

Transaction Costs

$ 10,808 FTE labor

$ 379 Phone calls

$ 100 Paper & postage

$ 11,287 TOTAL

May 2003 – October 2003

Does not include legal fees, administrator time, or cost of Internet connectivity or database creation.

$78 per book/volume

174 letters

159 follow up calls or email

Consultations with Legal Counsel

• WIPO signatories do not have the same copyright

laws (interpretations & practices)

– Eventually abandoned seeking permission for foreign

works because legal counsel wanted to examine every title

• Associated archival documents

– Fair use to digitize correspondence

from book dealers

– Perhaps fair use to digitize clippings

– Book catalogs are copyright protected

Problems Seeking Permission

• Determining copyright status

• Identifying & locating copyright holders

• Publishers

– Slow to respond

– Don’t know what they published

– Don’t know what rights they have

– Afraid of open access & lost revenue

Million Book Project 2002 – 2004

• Include 100,000+ U.S. copyrighted books

• Initial focus was Books for College Libraries

– 12,300 (25%) are definitely still in copyright

– 35,500 (71%) require checking copyright renewal records

• Initially intermittent labor

• Dedicated labor started November 2003

• Changed process to reduce transaction costs

– Books for College Libraries as approval plan for publishers

Request Letter & Strategy

• Educate

– Users want to find information online, but use print

– Open access increases use, even use of older works

– Open access does not decrease sales

– Open access can increase sales

– Currently no revenue

from out of print books

Request Letter & Strategy

• Ask for non-exclusive permission to digitize

& provide open access to

– All out of print, in copyright titles

– All titles published prior to ____________

– All titles published # or more years ago

– List of titles they provide

• No restrictions allowed

Request Letter & Strategy

• Assure

– Follow preservation standards & copyright law

– Restrict print & save to only one page at a time

• Give images, metadata, & OCR – Generate revenue from fee-based services

– Were seeking print on demand vendor,

but Indian government objects

to commercial partners

• Then prompt follow up

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

16%

16%4%

61%

3%

Permission granted

Permission denied

Not at this time

Still negotiating

No response(3 strikes & you’re out)

Preliminary Results

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

11%

44%

45%

Permission granted

Permission denied

Not at this time19% university presses

6% scholarly associations

Completed Negotiations

Comparative Results

Feasibility (titles)

Posner (titles)

Posner (publishers)

MBP (publishers)Completed negotiations

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Notlocated

Responserate

Successrate

66%

45%

Response rate based on contacts

Success rate based on responses

97%

45%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

17%

70%

7%

Titles # or more years ago

Titles prior to _______

Specified titles

All out of print titles

Analysis of Permissions Granted

6%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Contacted Responserate

Completionrate

Successrate

Analysis by Publisher Type

• Special publishers, authors & estates are most likely to grant permission

• Commercial publishers & university presses are least likely to grant permission

Scholarly assoc.

University press

Commercial

Authors & estates

Special publishers

Preliminary Transaction Costs

$ 28,582 Labor

$ 483 Phone calls

$ 216 Paper & postage

$ 29,281 TOTAL

Nov 2003 – Sept 2004

Does not include legal fees, administrator time, or cost of Internet connectivity or database creation.

$0.62 per book Roughly 47,500 titles

640 letters (25% in email)

582 follow up calls or email

Costs including Administrator Time

$ 31,027 Labor

$ 533 Phone calls

$ 220 Paper & postage

$ 41,780 TOTAL

Nov 2003 – Sept 2004

Does not include legal fees, cost of Internet connectivity, database creation, or administrator time on grant proposals.

$0.88 per book Roughly 47,500 titles

Administrator

– 889 email messages (5 min)

– Guess 10 letters

– Guess $50 phone calls

– Guess 300 hours data analysis,

presentations & publications

University Presses

• Began with university presses – Preliminary analysis of feasibility study data indicated

they were more likely to grant permission

• Snags– Copyright often reverts to author

when books go out of print

– More recent books will never go out of print because of print on demand contracts

– Third party copyright ownership issues

– 13 presses will consider titles WE specify

Experiments

• Compiling lists of titles – Books for College Libraries– 6 minutes per title to verify citation & copyright status

• Using Lesk’s copyright renewal records database

– Not cost effective to verify print status

– List of 300 titles takes 30 hours to prepare

• Locating authors or estates – Authors Registry– Charged $2.50 fee per author/estate found

– Same day response (25 requests)

– Found 52%

– 92% accuracy rate

Kahle v. Ashcroft – Supreme Court

• Challenge U.S. copyright system

– No records of copyright ownership

– Denies public access to orphaned works

without providing any benefits

• Submit examples of how barriers

to using out of print

books burden your

work http://notabug.com/kahle/

Public Domain Enhancement Act

• Copyright holders

– Pay small fee ($1.00) 50 years after publication

& every 10 years thereafter to retain copyright

– Provide contact information

• U.S. Copyright Office

– Handles financial transactions

– Creates public database

Thank you!Denise Troll Covey

Principal Librarian for Special Projects

Carnegie Mellon

[email protected]

412 268 8599