Two birds with one stone. An economically viable solution for linked open data platforms
Riccardo Bonazzi, Zhan Liu
University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland
HES-SO Valais-Wallis
Our idea in a nutshell
Problem:
Cost (data integration & platform management) VS
Profit (freely available data)
Gap in the literature:
existing classifications do not take into account economic sustainability.
Our solution:
a simple typology and revenue model for a linked open data platform [under test]
1
2
3
How to define a revenue model to increase the adoption of linked open data?
How to define a revenue model to increase the adoption of linked open data?
How to define a revenue model to increase the adoption of linked open data?
First order constructs
First order constructs
First order constructs
Idealtypes
First order constructs
Idealtypes
First order constructs
Idealtypes
Price : LowCost: LowThird-party support: LowProfit: Low
Price : LowCost: LowThird-party support: HighProfit: Medium
Price : LowCost: HighThird-party support: LowProfit: None
Price : LowCost: HighThird-party support: HighProfit: Medium
Price : HighCost: LowThird-party support: LowProfit: High
FREEMIUM (Pay for changes)
Price : HighCost: LowThird-party support: HighProfit: High
2B1S
Price : HighCost: HighThird-party support: LowProfit: Medium
Price : HighCost: HighThird-party support: HighProfit: High
RAZOR AND BLADE
Our idea in a nutshell
Cost VS Revenues
existing classifications
VS economic sustainability
a revenue model for LOD platform
[under test]
1
2
3
Two birds with one stone. An economically viable solution for LOD platforms
Recommended
