URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE:
TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCER ORGANIZATIONS
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY
G V Krishnagopala and R. W. Simmons
b
aAccess Livelihoods Consulting India Private Limited H.No 12-5-149/14/9/1, Creative Satya Nivas, Flat
No 304 Vijayapuri Colony, Tarnaka, Secunderbad-500017 bInternational Water Management Institute (IWMI), South Asia Regional Office, c/o ICRISAT
Patencheru, A.P., India
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to acknowledge the inputs to the report that were generated by the DGIS/IDRC
funded RUAF-CFF (Cities Farming for the Future) Project www.ruaf.org and the BMZ funded project
entitled ―Ensuring Health and Food Safety from Rapidly Expanding Wastewater Irrigation in South
Asia‖ www.iwmi.org. In addition the authors would like to acknowledge the inputs to the project
methodology provided by Dr. Deepa Joshi of IWMI-South Asia Office and to the FAO Project Focal
Point Ms. Clarissa Ruggieri and Dr. Hubert de Bon of CIRAD for their comments during the finalization
of this project report. We would also like to acknowledge the administrative support staff of Access
Livelihoods Consulting India Private Limited and IWMI- South Asia Office.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
KEY TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1. CONTEXT ANALYSIS
1.1 Andhra Pradesh and Hyderabad
1.2 Urbanization process
CHAPTER 2. URBAN AND PERI-URBAN AGRICULTURE (UPA) PROFILE
2.1 Historical development and status of UPA and Producers‘ Organizations in the city
of Hyderabad
2.1.1 Horticultural production in Andhra Pradesh and the expansion of informal
perishable vegetable production in Peri-Urban Hyderabad.
2.1.2 Dairy production in Hyderabad: Green fodder producers and informal urban
dairy units.
2.2 Organization of the urban/peri-urban green fodder production and marketing system,
stakeholder analysis and linkages with urban dairy producers.
2.2.1 Attapur, Hyderabad.
2.2.2 Uppal District, Hyderabad
2.3 The organization of the vegetable and fodder chain
2.3.1 Vegetables
2.3.2 Fodder
2.4 Constraint affecting low-income producer groups (Rapid diagnostic technique)
CHAPTER 3. INSTITUTIONAL PROFILE
3.1 Key institutions operating in HUA: Potential role in supporting or constraining UPA
related activities
3.1.1 Hyderabad Urban Development Authority (HUDA)
3.1.2 Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad MCH
3.1.3 Hyderabad Municipal Water Supply and Sanitation Board (HMWSSB)
3.1.4 Department of Agriculture (DOA)
3.1.5 Department of Horticulture (DOH)
3.1.6 Department of Animal Husbandry Dairying and Fisheries (DADF)
3.2 Policies and legal aspects concerning UPA and Producer Organizations
3.3 Overview of UPA innovations in the city
CHAPTER 4. ORGANIZATION PROFILE: PRODUCERS‘ COLLECTIVE
4.1 Context of Origin
4.2 Brief Historical Description
4.2.1 Collective Activity by Paragrass Producers
4.2.2 Producer Organization Profile
CHAPTER 5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Long-term trends in UPA in Hyderabad
5.1.1 Supportive Policies
5.1.2 Access to Credit
5.1.3 Access to water resources
5.1.4 Marketing
5.2 Conclusions and lessons learned
5.3 Recommendations
REFERENCES
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
ANNEX 1. IMAGES
Figure 1. IRS PAN (Merged) Satellite Image (2002) indicating MCH, HUDA and
Municipal Boundaries.
Figure 2. Peerzadiguda vegetable plots (2002)
Figure 3. Peerzadiguda vegetable plots (2006)
Figure 4. Fodder (Paragrass) cultivation in Attapur, Hyderabad (2006)
Photographs of fodder production, harvesting, transporting, marketing in Hyderabad
ANNEX 2. AREA, POPULATION AND GROWTH OF HYDERABAD URBAN
AGGLOMERATION (1991-2001)
ANNEX 3. THE SUPPLY AND MARKETING OF GRAINS, FRUIT AND FISH IN
HYDERABAD URBAN AGGLOMERATION: DEMAND AND SUPPLY
SCENARIO
ANNEX 4. ANDHRA BARRELA CATTLE MARKET, CHINTALAKUNTA
(VANASTHALIPURAM)
ANNEX 5. PROFILES OF SELECTED URBAN AND PERI-URBAN DAIRY UNITS
IN HYDERABAD
ANNEX 6. SYNDICATE FARMERS‘ SERVICE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY
LIMITED
ANNEX 7. KUSHAIGUDA VEGETABLE MARKET
ANNEX 8. CORPORATE SECTOR IN FRUIT &VEGETABLE BUSINESS: CASE
OF ITC'S CHOUPAL FRESH
ANNEX 9. THE ANDHRA PRADESH MUTUALLY AIDED COOPERATIVE
SOCIETY ACT (1995)
ANNEX 10. THE COMPANIES (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2002.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
HUA Hyderabad Urban Agglomeration
UPA Urban and Peri Urban Agriculture
POs Producer Organizations
SHGs Self Help Groups
PACS Primary Agricultural Credit Societies
LIPOs Low Income Producer Organizations
Rs Indian Rupees
HUDA Hyderabad Urban Development Authority
MCH Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad
HMWSSB Hyderabad Metropolitan Water Supply and Sanitation Board
DOA Department of Agriculture
DOAH Department of Horticulture
KEY TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
# Term Definition
1. Producers Include low-income people whose livelihood depends on UPA-related
activities or the food chain, including people involved in crop, livestock, fish
and forestry production or exploitation, small-scale processing, marketing
and preparation (such as hawking, street food vending, community-based
catering systems).
2. Producer
Organizations
Organizations or Institutional forms which address the constraints of
producers especially the low income producers and decrease their
vulnerability. These could be both formal and informal in nature. Any form
of collectives or groups through which producers are able to derive services
for better arrangements are treated as producer organizations
3. Urban – Peri
Urban
Agriculture
UPA can be defined as: the growing of plants and/or the raising of animals
for food and other uses (eg: recreation, environment improvement) within
urban and peri-urban areas, as well as the related production of inputs and
the processing and marketing of products.
IDRC (International Development Research Centre) Canada gives the
definition of UPA as: ―Urban and Peri-Urban agriculture or UPA is an
industry located within or on the fringe of a town, a city or a metropolis,
which grows or raises, processes and distributes, diversity of food and non
food products, (re) using largely human and material resources, products and
services found in and around the urban areas‖.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Rapid urbanization creates tremendous challenges in the provision of infrastructure, employment,
environmental management, food security, nutrition and health. Among the many challenges, one of
basic and crucial challenge that remains is ensuring food and nutritional security within the urban
zone. In this context urban and peri-urban agriculture (UPA) can make significant contributions by
acting as;
Source of livelihoods for a range of urban and peri-urban beneficiaries
Means of addressing urban and peri-urban food and nutritional security
Viable means of utilizing ‗appropriate‘ bio-degradable urban waste and thus facilitating both an
improvement in the urban environment and a return flow of recycle-able nutrients to UPA
production systems
Effective means of re-cycling urban wastewater (following appropriate pre-treatment, crop
selection and the implementation of strict multi-barrier risk mitigation options to prevent negative
impacts to producers and consumers as well as the sustainable use of soil resources)
Catalyst for micro-enterprise development
Means of achieving gender and social equity
Means of optimizing land utilization
However, currently in Hyderabad UPA and consequently, LIPOs fall outside of conventional research,
institutional and funding support mechanisms. It is practiced without supporting policies or guidelines
by small-and medium scale farmers but contributes to the urban food supply primarily in the form of,
green fodder and dairy products (dominated by fresh milk) and increasingly, perishable vegetables.
This report focuses primarily of green fodder (Paragrass) producers and urban dairies with. In a
broader context, expanding wastewater irrigated leafy vegetable production and the key constraints
and opportunities to the institutionalization and indeed wide-scale adoption of UPA activities in
Hyderabad are discussed.
Several key externalities are directly impacting on the long-term sustainability of peri-urban green
fodder production and small scale urban dairies in Hyderabad. Escalating land prices in the current
green fodder production areas ensure that land is increasingly being purchased for property
development. Linked to the escalating land prices and loss of agricultural HUDA and MCH are
actively implementing the ‗Musi Beautification Program‘ which when completed will encroach on
1,600 acres currently under green fodder production. This is expected to result in a 63% reduction in
fodder (Paragrass) entering the green fodder market. Further, a number of Acts enforced by MCH and
issued as public notifications by the Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad are restricting small scale
urban milk producers. A further externality influencing the long-term stability of urban ‗fresh milk‘
production systems is the Government Policy to promote the ‗branding‘ of milk and
processing/treatment prior to retail as a means of ensuring milk quality and public health. This is
supported by the Prevention of Food Adulteration (PFA) Rules (1995).
With regards supportive policies, there are two key State policies indirectly supporting the formation
of LIPOs namely the AP Mutually Aided Cooperative Societies Act (1995) and the Companies
(Amendment) Act, 2002. Limited water resources, is a key constraint for UPA in Hyderabad. In this
regard in Hyderabad it is mandatory for all new constructions to have a rainwater harvesting structure
either in the form of groundwater re-charge or water conservation. In addition, HMWSSB in
association with the National River Conservation Directorate (NRCD) is undertaking the ‗Musi River
Conservation Project‘. Both these initiatives are managed by HMWSSB. The Musi River
Conservation Project project document clearly states that the “treated sewage (secondary treatment)
from Amberpet and Nallahceruvu STPs (369 MLD) will be discharged into the existing irrigation
channels to support the current agricultural activities”. This is a marked improvement on the current
use of non-treated urban wastewater.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
This is a clear indication of institutional support in terms of providing both water quantity and
improved water quality for fodder, vegetable and rice producers along the Musi River. It is strongly
recommended therefore that vegetable, fodder and rice producers along the Musi River form producer
organizations under the aforementioned Acts. It is envisaged that the formation of such cooperative
structures will safeguard their current livelihoods and form a strong basis for direct dialogue with the
HMWSSB and other line agencies. The formation of such producer organizations will also strengthen
their lobbying power for services from government line agencies.
With the increasing pressure on the land available for green fodder (paragrass) production it is strongly
recommended that urban milk producers for a organizational structure to assist the ‗Green Fodder
Association‘ in lobbying for the protection of the existing fodder production area. Further it is
recommended that the ‗Green Fodder Association‘ and the urban dairy farmers and commercial dairy
units partner with consumers buying fresh milk to facilitate official recognition of their trade and
assure safety standards in all aspects of the production and consumption chain.
INTRODUCTION
Hyderabad is the capital city of the state of Andhra Pradesh and is also India‘s 6th largest metropolitan
city with a population in 2001 of 5.716 million registering a growth of 31 % over 1991. Currently in
Hyderabad UPA falls outside of conventional research, institutional and funding support mechanisms.
It is practiced without supporting policies or guidelines by small-and medium scale farmers. This
report will focus primarily on green fodder production, the development of the Green Fodder Farmers
Association and the linkages it has with informal small scale urban dairy producers. Externalities
including rapid urban expansion, urban development programs and policies directly and indirectly
impacting the peri-urban green fodder production - urban dairy system are discussed.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
Chapter 1. Context analysis
1.1 Andhra Pradesh and Hyderabad
Hyderabad is the capital city of the state of Andhra Pradesh (5th largest state in India, both in terms of
area and population) located in South India in the heart of the Deccan Plateau is at 536 meters above
sea level. Hyderabad is also India‘s 6th largest metropolitan city and in terms of world ranking
1 stands
at 40th. For 2004-5 the GDP of Andhra Pradesh was US$59.1 billion with a growth rate of 9.8%. Over
49% of the state GDP is generated by the service industry with approximately 25% of India‘s software
professionals based in Hyderabad. The industrial sector in Andhra Pradesh is ranked 2nd
in India in
terms of industrial estates with the industrial sector accounting for 27% of state GDP. Andhra Pradesh
is ranked 4th in terms of Foreign Direct Investment. With regards the agricultural sector, approximately
30% of the land are of AP is under agriculture with 22% under forest cover. Agriculture accounted for
22% of the state GDP in 2004-2005. Horticulture has been identified as one of the growth engines for
Andhra Pradesh. In 2004-2005 the total area under horticultural crops was 1,533,000 ha with an
annual production of 11,364,000 tonnes. Andhra Pradesh is the 2nd
largest producer of fruits and
vegetables in India and 1st in terms of mango, citrus, oil palm, chillies and tumeric. The horticulture
sector in Andhra Pradesh accounts for 4.01% of the State‘s GDP.
In 2001, the population of the Hyderabad Urban Agglomeration (HUA) stood at 5.716 million
registering a growth of 31 % over 1991 (Table 1: Annex 1). However, it is important to note that the
growth rate varies significantly with the growth rate of MCH being 18.7% as compared to growth rates
of 112.2% and 116.8% for Serlingampally and Qutubullapur, respectively. Population densities for the
aforementioned areas of Hyderabad are 20,920, 4,443 and 1,581 person‘s km2, respectively (Table 1:
Annex 1).
Hyderabad Urban Agglomeration is located within Ranga Reddy District. Bordering the peri-urban
limits of HUA north of Ranga Reddy District and towards the east/west of HUA (adjoining
Quthbullapur, Medchal and Shamirpet) is Medak District and towards the east/west of Ranga Reddy
District south of HUA (bordering Ghatkesakr, Keesara and Balangar) is Nalgonda District. The
average daytime temperature in Hyderabad ranges from 25-30oC during November to February and
40-45oC during April-June. Annual precipitation is between 700-1000 mm yr
-1 and falls predominantly
during the 4 months of July to October. Soils are dominated by Red Sandy Soils with areas of Black
Cotton Soil.
1.2 Urbanization process
This consists of the MCH, 10 municipalities and a vast area under Gram Panchayat. In order to plan
for this composite area, the Government of Andhra Pradesh constituted the "Hyderabad Urban
Development Authority" on 2nd October 1975. HUDA has prepared two master plans and 20 Zonal
Development plans for this area of which one master plan and 18 Zonal Development plans are
already notified by law and in force.
The HUA is now spread over the whole of the Hyderabad Urban Development Authority (HUDA)
area of jurisdiction an area of 1348 km2 (Figure 1: Annex 1). HUDA covers the entire District of
Hyderabad and parts of Ranga Reddy and Medak districts, it includes 173 km2 under Municipal
Corporation of Hyderabad (MCH) 416 km2 under 10 Municipalities and 759 km
2 under 105 gram
panchayats (Figure 1: Annex 1). Further, during 1988 to 1999 the built up area increased from 49.3 to
62.4 % of the total geographical area of the HUA. This occurred primarily in Serlingampally and
Qutubullapur, respectively (Table 1: Annex 2).
1Source: Census of India, 2001, Government of India
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
Agricultural land to the extent of about 128 km2 was converted to residential, commercial, institutional
and industrial purposes during the period from 1973 to 19962. With the urbanization process, the
radius of the HUA has expanded into the surrounding vacant lands and even water bodies. Over the
period from 1973 to 1996, the area under water bodies reduced from 118 to 110 km23
. According to
the 2001 statistics, HUA has a population of 6 million, a 17.2 % increase over the population of 1991
making it one of the fastest growing urban areas in India.
Driving forces for urbanization are the rapid expansion of the service IT sector (including Winpro,
Infosys, Microsoft) and outsourcing of services from the UK (e.g. HSBC Bank). In addition, there has
been a rapid migration of families from rainfed rural A.P. in search of employment opportunities
(primarily as construction labour) and to access government services. The rapid urbanization and
influx of IT companies (and associated IT professionals) has resulted in a concomitant rise in land
prices. The current district wise land prices in Hyderabad range from 85,098 US$ to 638,241 US$ per
acre (Table 2). This has resulted in a rapid decline in area available for Urban and Peri-urban
agriculture. However, the rapid increase in population has also resulted in a concomitant increase in
the demand for food products including perishable vegetables and dairy products.
Table 2. District wise land prices (November. 2006) in and around Hyderabad Municipality Land Prices (Rs) sq
yard
Rs per acre US$ per acre
Serilingampally 6000 29,040,000 638,241
MCH 1500 7,260,000 159,560
Kukatpally 1500-2250 7,260,000 – 10,890,000 159,560 – 239,340
Malkajgiri 4200 20,328,000 446,769
Alwal 1000 4,840,000 106,373
Khapra 3000-4500 14,520,000 – 21,780,000 319,120 – 478,681
L B Nagar 2250 10,890,000 239,340
Qutubullapur 800 3,872,000 85,098
Rajendra nagar 1800 8,712,000 191,472
Uppal 1500-2250 7,260,000 – 10,890,000 159,560 – 239,340
Uppal x road upto Musi
River 60‘depth 5000 24200000 531,868
Source: www.igrs.ap.gov.in
Chapter 2. UPA Profile
2.1 Historical development and status of UPA and Producers’ Organizations in the city
of Hyderabad
With the expected shifts in rural-urban populations (60% of world population in urban centres by
2030) Urban and Peri-urban Agriculture (UPA) is increasingly being seen by city authorities as a
means to address urban ‗food security‘ (encompasses year round availability, accessibility and
affordability of „safe‟ and nutritious food), income generation and a means of effectively utilizing
municipal solid waste and wastewater. However, currently in Hyderabad UPA falls outside of
conventional research, institutional and funding support mechanisms. It is practiced without
supporting policies or guidelines by small-and medium scale farmers but contributes to the urban food
supply primarily in the form of perishable vegetables, green fodder and dairy products (dominated by
fresh milk).
3Source: EPTRI, 1996: 23; The Hindu, 25 January 1997, quoted in Ramachandraiah C. and Prasad S. Impact of
Urban Growth on Water Bodies: The Case of Hyderabad. Centre for Economic and Social Studies, Hyderabad.
Working Paper 60.2004.pg 7 4Ramachandraiah C. and Prasad S. Impact of Urban Growth on Water Bodies: The Case of Hyderabad. Centre
for Economic and Social Studies, Hyderabad. Working Paper 60.2004.pg 7
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
This is also due to the fact that there has been considerable growth in the fodder cultivation and dairy
farming sectors (including small urban producers) in the last 5-10 years. However, a number of
externalities are now putting increasing pressure on the fodder/dairy system and hence chain of
economic beneficiaries which may negatively impact on small urban dairy producers. In addition, a
producer organization (Green Fodder Farmers Association) is already functioning to try to address the
issues of fodder producers in Hyderabad. Consequently, this report will focus on these three
commodity groups namely perishable vegetables, green fodder and dairy products and associated
producer organizations (formal and informal). A summary of the grain, fisheries and fruit food chain is
given in Annex 3.
2.1.1 Horticultural production in Andhra Pradesh and the expansion of informal perishable
vegetable production in Peri-Urban Hyderabad.
In Andhra Pradesh, the successful implementation of Horticulture Department programs has resulted
in the area under horticultural crops being increased from 1.133 million ha in 1995-96 to 1.579 million
ha in 2004-5. A breakdown of the crop type, area under cultivation and annual production is given in
Table 3. This is to a large extent associated with the AP Micro-irrigation Project (Government Orders
G.O. MS. Nos. 1328, 13131, 176, 175, 313 and 08) that was initiated in 2003. Under this scheme
farmers are eligible for subsidies of up to 50,000 Rs (1098 US$) per family. In total between 3-11-03
and 31-03-06, 209.96 Crore Rs (46,145,054 US$) was provided in the form of subsidies to farmers.
This program does not exclude Peri-urban farmers.
Table 3. Horticultural Production in Andhra Pradesh (2004-2005)
Commodity Group
Fruit Vegetables Spices
Crop Type
Area
(ha)
Production
(metric t) Crop Type
Area
(ha)
Production
(metric t)
Crop
Type
Area
(ha)
Production
(metric t)
Mango 391896 3135096 Potato 3787 60592 Chillies 224474 538738
Orange &
Batavia 109316 1421108 Tapioca 18759 375180 Tumeric 61833 241149
Lemon 50791 7000920 Sweet Potato 719 14380 Betelvine 2869 91521
Guava 10064 120763 Cucumber 3943 59145 Coriander 43301 30311
Banana 53465 1229695
Cabbage
(Knol-Khol) 8225 98700 Tamarind 4668 46680
Grapes 1892 37840 Peas 176 1760 Garlic 1336 6680
Papaya 905 69232 Gourds 12817 128170 Arecanut 382 535
Sapota 13973 136935 Carrot 4278 85560 Cocoa 8221 1545
Pomegranate 5761 47816 Tomato 69502 1251036 Pepper 271 300
Custard Apple 908 4812 Egg Plant 24662 493240 Ajwan 1500 450
Others 2538 25380 Okra 24094 301175 Ginger 1608 2894
Total 641509 13229597 Onion 35414 566624 Total 350463 960803
Beans 16781 100686
Greens 9076 63532
Bottle Gourd 718 7180
Others 25494 254940
Total 258445 3861900
Source: Handbook of Horticultural Statistics 2006: Department of Horticulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh.
Note: Table 2 does not include area under cashew, oil palm or coconut which accounted for 328,583ha in 2004-
2005.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
The high urban demand for perishable leafy vegetables (including, cabbage, spinach, amaranthis,
fenugreek, mint, coriander and fennel) and limited storage capacity particularly during February to
September is one of the key driver‘s behind the expansion of wastewater irrigated vegetable
production in peri-urban Peerzadiguda, and Parvatapurum, Rangareddy District. Interpretation of time
series satellite images (Figure 2 and 3: Annex 1) indicates that the wastewater irrigated area under
leafy vegetable production has increased from 5.562 ha in 2002 to 16.017 ha in 2006. This
corresponds to a 187.9% increase in leafy vegetable production between April 2002 and April 2006.
2.1.2 Dairy production in Hyderabad: Green fodder producers and informal urban dairy units.
Waste water irrigated fodder (Paragrass: Gramineae Panicum purpurascens) is cultivation along the
Musi River belt primarily in two main areas namely, Attapur and Uppal to Ghatkesar and Hyatnagar
Mandals. During the confined course of the Musi River through urban Hyderabad with the exception
of paragrass cultivation in the Musi River Bed there is no significant level of agriculture being
practiced. Para grass cultivation in the Attapur area occupies an area of 172.75 acres (69.94 ha)
(Figure 4). The primary areas of paragrass cultivation are located in the Uppal area, Ghatkesar Mandal
and Hyatnagar Mandal and are either direct or lift irrigated with marginal quality water from the Musi
River. As of April 2006 the area under paragrass in the Uppal area, Ghatkesar Mandal and Hyatnagar
Mandal 1023.7 ha (2529.6 acres). The para grass grown areas are predominantly falling under
Peerzadaguda, Parvatapuram, Marripalli, Kachivanisingaram, Qutbullapur, Timmaiguda, Pratap
Singaram, Bacharam, Gaurelli, Makta, Korremul villages which are located all along River Musi.
India ranks first in world milk production (Ramnath, 2002). Moreover, the annual rate of growth in
milk production in India is between 5-6 % compared to 1 % globally. The steep rise in the growth
pattern has been attributed to a sustained expansion in domestic demand (India Dairy, 2003). This is a
result of Operation Flood (Phase I-III) which was initiated in the 1970‘s to promote the formation of
organized dairies at a district level and resulted in the establishment of 700+ dairies with a capacity of
200,000- 300,000 l d-1
. However, this has a rural focus and does not take into account ‗urban‘ and
peri-urban milk producers. Andhra Pradesh has seen some dramatic increase in milk production over
the last two decades, based primarily on buffaloes There was a 7.9% increase in the population of
female buffaloes in 1999 as compared to 1993 (Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Andhra
Pradesh, 2001). The milk production of Andhra Pradesh in 1991-92 was 2.9 million tonnes increasing
to 4.9 million tonnes by 2003 (NDDB, 2003). Less than 20% of the milk is produced by industry in
India. The remaining 80% is either for household consumption or is marketed through informal
channels (Staal, 2001). According to the 17th Quinquennial Livestock Census 2003 there were 31,339
Buffalo and 4,357 Cattle within HUA. Dairy Cooperatives of Ranga Reddy District (rural) come under
the jurisdiction of MOTHER DAIRY located at Hayathnagar, Hyderabad. Approximately, 28 dairy
cooperatives supply milk to MOTHER DAIRY.
The total liquid milk consumption in HUA is approximately 1.3 million l d-1
. The contribution of
packed and branded milk is 850-900,000 l d-1
with 400,000 l d-1
sold as ‗fresh‘ milk supplied by
private vendors in Ranga Reddy District (30-40km from HUA) and small dairy farms (<10 head)
located within the HUA. The consumption of other milk products such as butter, ghee, milk powder,
ice cream and curd is a further 100,000 l d-1
. All of the milk products except for curd (which is
supplied by small private dairies and home preparation accounts for nearly half of the curd
consumption) are supplied by the organized dairies. Thus close to 65 to 70% of the city‘s demand for
milk and milk products are met by the organized dairies. Among the packed and branded milk
supplied in the city, there are 4 cooperative dairies selling milk in the HUA with a total market share
of 48% and the remaining 52 % is supplied by private dairies. Taking in to account the milk
procurement area of the cooperative and private dairies, out of the total milk and milk products
consumption, around 40-50 percent is met from the HUA, Nalgonda and Rangareddy districts. The
remaining milk supply comes from other districts and states. While, the cooperative dairies procure
milk from the milk producers in the villages, the private dairies located in the urban and peri-urban
areas have their own dairy cattle for milk. Their procurement from other milk producers is negligible.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
In dairy producer households, 25% of the milk produced (assuming a household of 6 members owns
one buffalo) is retained for household consumption and 75% is sold. Dairy producers‘ livestock also
serves as a security asset in times of need (Buechler and Devi, 2003). Ensuring a stable and sustainable
quality fodder supply and efficient marketing structure is an essential component of the dairy industry
(formal and informal) in Hyderabad. This is particularly pertinent for small scale low income urban
producers.
2.2 Organization of the urban/peri-urban green fodder production and marketing
system, stakeholder analysis and linkages with urban dairy producers.
2.2.1 Attapur, Hyderabad.
There is 172.75 acres (69.94 ha) of land belonging to 3 landowners in the Attapur area irrigated by the
Musi River water (Figure 4: Annex 1). There are around 15-20 small sized dairy owners, who have
taken the land on lease as per their fodder requirements. The lease rates are in the range of Rs 1500
(32.9 US$) to Rs 2000 (43.9 US$) per month per acre or 395 – 527 US$ per annum. The term of lease
is for one year. The dairy owners can make the payments in 3 or more installments depending upon the
mutual agreement between the land-owners and the dairy owners taking the land on lease. The land-
owner is responsible for the irrigation of the fields of the different lessees. The irrigation is through
pump sets, which are used to draw water from the Musi River. One caretaker is employed by the land-
owner to take manage the irrigation. However, the salary is paid by the lessees based on the acreage
leased. During the winter season, urea is required for better growth of the paragrass. Around one bag
(50 kg) of urea is required per acre once during the winter season. The lessees purchase the urea and
provide to the caretaker for application on their respective fields. Each of the dairy owners employs 1-
2 persons to cut the fodder daily and transport it to the livestock shed. The transportation is through
bullock carts owned by the dairy owners, or through rented rickshaws. The average distance between
the fields and the livestock sheds is 2-4 km.
In Attapur area, the fodder value chain is as follows4:
As stated earlier, there are around 15-20 dairies in the Kishanbagh area adjoining Attapur. The average
herd size is 13-15 buffaloes of Murrah and Gujjar variety. The dairies procure green fodder from the
leased fields and dry maize stock (Kutti) and feed concentrate or cottonseed oil cake purchased from
the suppliers in the local market. The purchase is both on cash and credit basis. Out of the 4
respondents in the area, one had personally gone to Punjab to purchase the Murrah buffaloes, while the
remaining had purchased the breeds from the local suppliers in Hyderabad city who in turn get the
buffaloes from Punjab. The average yield of milk is 3-5 litres per buffalo per day. The total daily milk
yield of a dairy with 15 head of buffalo is around 45-75 litres. The manual labour required for a 13-15
cattle size dairy is 4 persons. In almost all the dairies, 2-3 persons were employed as external labourers
apart from the household labour. There is no involvement of women in either fodder collection or
animal rearing.
4 Based on interviews and surveys of dairy cattle owners in the Kishanbagh area
Paragrass: Attapur
Agricultural fields leased
by urban land owners to
dairy cattle owners
Landowner responsible for
irrigation of leased fields
Dairy cattle owners (Location:
Kishanbagh)
Pay annual lease of 395-527 US$
to land owners
Responsible for fodder cutting
and transportation
Responsible for fertilizer inputs
Milk Consumers
(Location: Attapur,
Mehdipattnam)
Hotels (70%)
Households (30%)
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
More than 50 % of the dairies supply ‘fresh‘ milk to hotels and households located in the surrounding
area. There are no middlemen involved in the purchase and supply of milk. Some of the dairy owners
supply to households located as far as the Charminar area (5km from Attapur). The average retail price
of fresh milk is Rs 22 to 25 per litre. This results in a daily income, ranging from 21.7 US$ (22 Rs x
45 l) to 41.2 US$ (25 Rs x 75 l). Assuming that this milk is consistently produced at this rate 365 days
per year this results in a gross income of 7,920 - 15,220 US$ (Note: This does not take into account
(outputs costs such as land rental, labour, feed concentrate, veterinary services etc). Around 5 percent
of the milk is converted into Dahi.
2.2.2 Uppal District, Hyderabad
As of April 2006 the area under paragrass in the Uppal area, Ghatkesar Mandal and Hyatnagar Mandal
was 1023.7 ha (2529.58 acres). Preliminary results of collaborative IWMI-ILRI research indicate an
average yield (n=64 sample plots) of 19.325 (2.87) t ha-1
(FW) or 7.823 t per acre. Paragrass is cut
every 30-40 days (dependent on seasonal yield variations and demand) resulting in 10-12 cuts per
year. With an average yield per cut of 19.325 t ha-1
(FW) for the total area under paragrass (1023.7 ha)
this results in a combined annual fodder production of approximately 197,830 – 237,396 t yr-1
(FW).
The average cultivated landholding by one land owner is 25-30 acres. Once planted annual re-seeding
of paragrass is not required. As a result of the wastewater nutrient load, no external inputs are required
for the growth of the paragrass. Pesticide is applied to control mosquitoes once every three months.
Water supply is derived from the Musi River directly through in-field irrigation channels (previously
established for rice) or via lift irrigation to the aforementioned irrigation channels. The agriculture
labourers are paid Rs 1.5 (0.032 US$) for a bundle of 10 kg. This also requires loading the truck. The
fodder labour consists of 35 % women. There is no discrimination in the rate paid to men and women.
Labour consists primarily of migrants from rainfed areas of Andhra Pradesh. The land owners also
employ a supervisor to manage irrigation and labour.
The average landholding in the area is 2 acres. However, to ensure a profitable turnover, a minimum
of 25-30 acres (10.12 – 12.14 ha) of land should be cultivated to provide regular income. At present
around 40 major land owners cum farmers are engaged in paragrass cultivation in the area. With an
average land holding of 25-30 acres this accounts for approximately 45% of the area under paragrass.
The rest of the former farmers/landowners have leased out their lands to the current practising farmers
who are predominantly migrants from rainfed areas of Andhra Pradesh. Eight cultivators and 8 non-
cultivating landowners were surveyed. All of the 8 cultivators have their own vehicle (2-5 tonne lorry)
or tractor and the average cultivated land area is 28 acres. Five of the 8 are also real estate agents as an
additional non-farm activity. One cultivator also has a family owned Cinema Hall. The age-group of
the para grass cultivators is 28-37 years. The education level is intermediate to graduation level. Three
of them also have livestock ranging from 3-5 buffalo. The remainder have given up dairying as they
consider paragrass cultivation to be a more profitable activity. Labour shortage and low rates of milk
in the Uppal area are stated to be the reasons for moving from dairy to fodder production.
Out of the non-cultivating landowners surveyed, 5 had a household level landholding of less than 2
acres each. The reasons cited for giving up the land on lease were the non-availability of own
transportation vehicle and lack of manpower to oversee the fodder cultivation. These 5 landowners
preferred to work as agricultural labourers themselves earning a daily wage ranging from Rs 60 (1.31
US$) to Rs 100 (2.2 US$). A couple can earn 10.48 US$ (1.31 x 4hrs x 2 persons) to 17.6 US$ (2.2 x
4hrs x 2 persons) together by working for 4 hours in the field in the morning hours. The afternoons are
free to pursue other labour work. The lease rates are Rs 2000 (44 US$) per month per acre.
Agricultural labour followed by income from land lease is the major source of occupation/income.
Two out of the five had two milch animals each. The milk was used for home consumption and
surplus sold to the local traders at Rs 13 per litre (0.28 US$ per litre). Three of the non-cultivating
landowners had around 15-20 acres of land at the household level (the individual landholding is on an
average 2 acres, however in practice, the aggregate ownership for the households interviewed is 15-20
acres).
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
All of these were in the age group of more than 60 years and stated age and lack of family manpower
to oversee the cultivation (of the three, all have children engaged in real estate or other business and
two have one son each settled abroad) as the primary reasons for leasing the land. All three landowner
families derive around 80 % of the income from the lease of land (15-20 acres at 44 US$ per acre per
month = 660 – 880 US$ per month).
In the Uppal area, the fodder value chain is as follows
5:
2.3 The organization of the vegetable and fodder chain
2.3.1 Vegetables
There are 4 major vegetable belts, which supply vegetables to the HUA namely, Shamirpet-
Vantimamidi, Shamsabad-Shadnagar, Cheverala-Vikarabad and Medchal-Tupram. This vegetable
catchment area meets 75 to 80 % of the demand in HUA in the 4 months from October to January. In
the remaining 8 months, these vegetable production areas are only able to meet 30% of the demand in
HUA. The residual demand in all seasons is met by supply from outside the HUA, from the following
belts namely, Ibrahimpatnam to Chowtuppal, Vijaywada-Mangalgiri and Bangalore-Kolar.
However, Hyderabad is a major trading center for vegetables. There are around 13 AMC regulated
markets in HUA (6 in Hyderabad and 7 in RR district but part of the HUA) for trading of vegetables.
The large number of wholesale vegetable merchants and commission agents cater to the supply of the
HUA and also channel the supply to other districts of the state e.g. Karimnagar and also to distant
places such as Khammam and Chennai for leafy vegetables. The practice is to purchase and load in
own vehicles for transportation to other districts6. There are 6 Rythu Bazaars also established by the
government in different parts of the HUA. The Rythu Bazaars are marketplaces where Rythus or
vegetable producers can sell directly. However, as per an estimate, around 60 percent are non-
producers. In Rythu Bazaars and other vegetable markets, small non-farmer retailers are women.
However, no women are involved in the wholesale purchase activity. For further details of an informal
market association namely Kushaiguda Market is given in Annex 6.
Leafy vegetables produced in peri-urban Peerzadiguda, and Parvatapurum are primarily sold in Uppal
vegetable market. Vegetables are in general harvested in the late afternoon and washed and stored in
the producer‘s household before being sold to wholesalers at the market in the early morning (5am –
6am).
5 Based on interviews and surveys of dairy cattle owners in the Kishanbagh area
6 This is to avoid chances of establishment of direct linkage between vegetable merchants from whom the
Hyderabad based merchants and agents purchase and the merchants to whom they sell.
35-40 Paragrass growers
(Location: Uppal)
Average fodder
cultivation area per
grower is 30 acres
Transportation is through
own lorries of growers
6 Brokers (Location: Golnaka
market, Kacheguda)
Commission of 5% is
charged on the fodder value
Transportation to dairy units
is through bullock carts,
rickshaws, trillers
Dairies (Location: Old city area, main
market and outskirts)
10-12 goshalas (Location: Old city)
Around 75 % supply is through the
brokers and the remaining are direct
contracts with producers
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
The value chain of vegetables is as follows:
2.3.2 Fodder
Approximately 75 % of the paragrass production is traded in the Golnaka Green Fodder market, while
the remaining 25% is traded directly with both large and small dairy units and Goshalas (Animal
Breeding Units). Assuming an annual fodder production of approximately 197,830 – 237,396 t yr-1
(FW) this means that there is an annual through flow of approximately 148,372 - 178,047 t yr-1
. This
corresponds to a daily through flow of 400 – 487 t day-1
. The fodder harvesting gets completed by 10
am and the trading time in the market is from 10 am to 1.30 pm (though there are no fixed timings).
The rate is decided on the basis of market arrivals of fodder and the demand. Generally, the rate
remains uniform over a period. ILRI-IWMI estimate (value derived from bi-weekly market fodder
sampling Oct 2005 – Oct 2006) that paragrass (FW) is sold to buyers at a rate of approximately 1 Rs
per kg (FW). This corresponds to a financial through flow of 400,000 – 487,000 Rs per day (8,791 –
10,703 US$). There are 6 brokers in the fodder market that receive 5% commission (Section 2.2.2) on
green fodder sales. This corresponds to a daily individual income of per broker of 3,333 – 4,058 Rs
(73 – 90 US$).
Most of the fodder suppliers deal with only one broker. Thus over a period of time long-term
relationships have been formed between the producers and the brokers. This also provided flexibility
in payments. Though the system is that the producers are paid in cash by the brokers, who in turn
supply around 50 % of the fodder to the suppliers on credit basis, one or two days may be delayed in
making payments to the producers. Fifty percent of the cultivators drive their own vehicle to the
market, while others have employed drivers. One person accompanies the driver to unload the grass
bundles at the market. He is paid Rs 10 for unloading of one lorry. There are around 15-20 small
rickshaw pullers, 10-12 bullock carts, 10-12 tangas (horse-pulled cart) and 15-20 auto riskshaw‘s and
4-5 trillers which supply the paragrass to the different dairy units located in the old city area. There are
2-3 buyers (dairy unit owners) who bring their own vehicle to transport the grass. The rickshaw pullers
have linkages with the dairy units in the city area and transport on a daily basis. The payment to such
rickshaw pullers is on a monthly basis.
The cultivators give Rs 50 (1.01 US$) as rent per vehicle daily to the market. The brokers pay around
Rs 350 (7.70 US$) as monthly rent. The average rent paid to the Waqf Board is Rs 17,000 per month
(373.6 US$). There are around 6 brokers in the Golnaka market; all of these have been dealing for
more than 5 years. Each broker has at least two employees, one to make payments and both to keep
track of loading and unloading for different clients. Apart from the rickshaw pullers, bullock cart and
tanga owners around 5-8 hamalis (porters) also find work in the market area. There are 3-4 rooms in
the market premises, which have been leased to one cattle feed trader (dealing in both concentrate feed
and maize stova). It is estimated that over 1,000 individuals are directly related to the fodder market
(Buechler and Devi, 2003). This includes casual farm labour, brokers, land owners and renters. The
formal and informal dairy system is well organised in the city. For a detailed brief on Andhra Barrela
Cattle Market (ABM), Chintalakunta and selected dairy farms refer to Annex 4 and 5.
Producer WH. Traders in wholesale mkts Semi-Retailers Retailers
Rythu Bazaars or Storage for some veg Grading Grading
WH. Traders in nearest town
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
2.4 Constraint affecting low-income producer groups (Rapid diagnostic technique)
Currently, the existing green fodder and urban dairy system particularly small urban producers is
economically viable and provides an integrated service e.g. procuring inputs, production and
marketing. Inputs are cheap and currently available at the green fodder market. The urban dairy
producers are operating in a high margin market as transport costs (and labour costs) are minimal due
to close proximity of consumers and the fodder market. Consequently, infrastructural bottle necks are
minimal. No reason economically to form a cooperative of ‗urban‘ dairy producers to reduce
production, operating and marketing costs. In addition, the current legal constraints discussed in detail
in Section 3.2 would prevent ‗un-licensed‘ urban dairy producers from highlighting their existence let
alone forming a registered organization.
With regards the wastewater irrigated peri-urban leafy vegetable producers in Peerzadiguda, and
Parvatapurum, Rangareddy District key constraints to the formation of low income vegetable
producers is a paucity of robust scientific evidence of actual risks to producers and potential risks to
consumers. The current vegetable producers along the Musi are operating without institutional support
as the agricultural re-use of marginal quality waters is not covered by the respective line agencies.
However, as stated in Section 5.1, HMWSSB has designed its STPs with agriculture as the end-user.
As stated, the risk to producer, consumer and environmental health and the economic tradeoffs and
benefits of wastewater activities in selected study sites along the Musi River are currently being
investigated by IWMI and collaborating partners. The BMZ funded project entitled ―Ensuring Health
and Food Safety from Rapidly Expanding Wastewater Irrigation in South Asia‖ will develop,
implement, validate and promote the uptake of a set of risk mitigation options (multi-barrier
approaches) based on a comprehensive assessment of risks and benefits associated with wastewater
irrigation. Close collaboration is being established with relevant city partners particularly HMWSSB
and the vegetable producers to ensure input, adoption and institutionalization of project outputs.
A further constraint to the formation of low income vegetable producer organization/s along the Musi
River Belt is public perception of the risks associated with ‗wastewater irrigated‘ vegetables. Even if
risk mitigation options are in place to prevent consumer health risks public perception may negatively
impact sales.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
Chapter 3. Institutional Profile
3.1 Key institutions operating in HUA: Potential role in supporting or constraining UPA
related activities
As stated previously, currently in Hyderabad UPA falls outside of conventional research, institutional
and funding support mechanisms. It is practiced without supporting policies or guidelines by small-
and medium scale farmers. However, there are several formal and informal institutional forms
primarily marketing orientated which operate in HUA and surrounding rural districts. These
institutional forms include;
Producer Organizations
Primary Agricultural Credit Societies (PACS)
Marketing Systems
o Agricultural Marketing Committees
o Retail Institutions
o Informal Market Institutions
Farmer Unions and Groups
The most common form of ‗producer organization‘ in rural areas of Andhra Pradesh are cooperatives
which service all the needs of farmers especially small and marginal. These services range from
provision of credit, seed, fertilizer, pesticides, lobbying and marketing services. These registered
cooperatives have proper bylaws and business rules and comply with the requirements AP Mutually
Aided Coop Society Act (1995) Amended 2002. An example of such an organization is the Syndicate
Farmers‘ Service Cooperative Society Limited (Annex 6). Further examples can be seen on the AP
Online Website http://www.aponline.gov.in
Primary Agriculture Credit Societies (PACS) in India were established to provide rural farmers and
rural poor access to finance. Since the inception of central Indian economic planning in 1950, the
government has favored cooperative societies as a channel for providing credit and as a means of
broadening the experience of villagers in such activities as marketing, community farming, and
consumer purchasing. Credit societies were the first to be established and continue to be the most
extensive and important group of cooperatives. Of the roughly 250,000 cooperatives in India in 1980,
about 100,000 were PACS. By the late 1980s, because regional rural banks were doing more lending,
the number of PACS had decreased to 87,300. By 1988 there were 93,000 PACS operating in rural
areas, with a membership of 89.8 million. The societies aimed for universal membership in order that
poorer members of society could join cooperatives and use their services. Total loans advanced by
such societies amounted to nearly Rs 36.9 billion (791, 208,791 US$) during 1987. These rural
agricultural credit societies had a share capital of about Rs10.1 billion (219,780,219 US$) at the end of
June 1988. Thus PACS play a vital role of providing access to credit for rural farmers, producers and
poor. To what extent there is scope to establish PACS for UPA requires further investigation.
Agriculture Market Committees (AMCs) are regulated market yards promoted across the rural areas of
AP to provide just marketing service to the farmers. These are government recognized market spaces
where registered traders (registered as sole proprietary firms) and intermediaries operate and by law
are suppose to follow the minimum support prices announced by the State Government. The AMCs
however tend to be exploitative as traders for cartels to ensure beneficial prices during the
procurement process. Rythu Bazars or ‗Farmer Markets‘ of the vegetables and fruits have been put in
place by the government across Hyderabad (Section 2.3.1). These markets are places where the
farmers can hire space at a nominal cost and sell their produce so that the margins gained by the
market intermediaries are directly realized by the farmers. However, due to poor infrastructural links
with peri-urban and rural areas time and labour constraints farmers end up selling their produce
through intermediaries that occupy the concession market space.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
Informal structures occur in the aforementioned markets namely informal norms for sharing business,
fixing prices and entry and exit barriers as protective measures for existing traders. Retail markets in
India in the form of ‗Malls and ‗Marts‘ have boomed since 2000. Following the US and European
model, large malls, mega marts, hyper markets and supermarkets are being promoted. In Hyderabad
stores that retail processed and fresh agricultural products include Food World, Trinethra, Ratandeep,
Spencers Supermarkets, Reliance (opened 18 stores in Hyderabad in 2006), 24 Lettered Mantra
(Organic) and Pure and Natural. These stores cater for middle and high income groups. In addition,
there are numerous privately owned fruit and vegetable stores servicing local communities. Farming
Unions and allied groups operate as both formal and informal groups and are primarily established to
very specific temporary needs of farmers including protection of land and fighting for better prices. A
listing of rurally based farmer groups and organizations servicing farmer needs in rural AP can be
found at http://www.aponline.gov.in. Other emerging innovative market systems include Choupal
Fresh details of which are given in Annex 7. In addition to the aforementioned formal and informal
marketing structures several government and municipal agencies operate within HUA namely, HUDA,
MCH and HMWSSB. In addition, the Department of Horticulture, Department of Agriculture and
Department of Animal Husbandry Dairying and Fisheries (DADF) will also be discussed.
As indicated in the following synopsis, UPA is not currently included directly and hence not supported
within the mandate of any of the major line agencies and research and technology institutions,
municipal organizations discussed above. However, there is considerable scope for the recognition and
institutionalization of UPA by the DOH. Strategies to promote the future institutionalization of UPA
in Hyderabad are, outlined in Section 3.3. In addition, potential linkages with HMWSSB will be
discussed in Section 5.1.
3.1.1 Hyderabad Urban Development Authority (HUDA)
The metropolitan area of Hyderabad was notified under the Andhra Pradesh Urban (Development) Act
1975 and termed as "Development Area". This consists of the MCH, 10 municipalities and a vast area
under Gram Panchayat. In order to plan for this composite area, the Government of Andhra Pradesh
constituted the "Hyderabad Urban Development Authority" on 2nd October 1975. HUDA's
jurisdiction extends over an area of 1,348 km2. Covering the entire district of Hyderabad and parts of
Ranga Reddy and Medak districts, it includes 173 km2 under Hyderabad Municipal corporation Area
and 416 km2 under 10 Municipalities and 1273 km
2 under 105 Gram Panchayats. HUDA has four
primary functions namely;
Planning: Preparation and revision of Master Plan and Zonal Development Plans
Regulation and Control: To regulate and control the development through statutory plans and
other measures.
Development: To undertake various developmental projects in the Developmental Area. HUDA
has prepared 2 Master Plans and 20 Zonal Development plans of which one Master Plan and 18
Zonal Development plans are already notified by law and in force.
Coordination: To coordinate with other public agencies (namely MCH and HMWSSB) concerned
with provisions of urban infrastructure, services and amenities.
During 2000-2005 HUDA through Dutch Government Funding undertook the Greening Hyderabad
Environment Program (GHEP) which focused on the establishment of women‘s SHG‘s (+ access to
credit), provision of seedlings and training in the nurturing of tree and ornamental plants to support the
GHEP. Further details can be found at http://www.hudahyd.org.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
3.1.2 Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad (MCH)
Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad (MCH) is a local body established under Hyderabad Municipal
Corporation Act 1955 and covers an area of 169.3 km2. The Municipal Corporation is primarily the
main deliberative organ for Hyderabad. The Corporation meets for the transaction of business at such
time and place as may be fixed by the Mayor, in his absence by the Deputy Mayor, and in the absence
of both by the Chairman of the Standing Committee. Normally the Corporation meets twice in a
month. Usually every meeting is open to the Public. The Obligatory duties of MCH relate to erection
of substantially boundary marks defining the limits of the city; maintenance of public streets, roads,
public health and other matters relating to sanitation and improvement of the city. However, under the
Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act 1955 MCH is implementing a number of Acts that are directly
impacting on urban and peri-urban dairy producers and hence indirectly on green fodder producers.
This is discussed in detail in Section 3.2. Further details regarding MCH can be found at
http://www.mch.org.
3.1.3 Hyderabad Municipal Water Supply and Sanitation Board (HMWSSB)
Hyderabad Metropolitan Water Supply and Sanitation Board was constituted on 1st November 1989
under the provisions of Hyderabad Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Act 1989 (Act No . 15 of
1989). The functions and responsibilities of HMWSSB in the Hyderabad Metropolitan Area are to
supply potable water including planning, design, construction, maintenance, operation & management
of the water supply system. In addition, HMWSSB is responsible for sewerage, sewerage disposal and
sewerage treatment works including planning, design, construction, maintenance, operation &
management of all sewerage and sewerage treatment works. In this regard HMWSSB will play a key
role in future UPA activities as discussed further in Section 5.1. For further information on HMWSSB
refer to http://www.hyderabadwater.gov.in.
3.1.4 Department of Agriculture (DOA)
The Department of Agriculture (DOA) provides agricultural extension services primarily for grain
crops to rural farmers and transfers the latest technical knowledge to the farming community,
including the introduction of high yielding varieties, laying demonstrations, imparting training to
farmers to improve skills & knowledge to increase agricultural production and productivity. The other
objectives of the DOA are to assess requirements of agriculture inputs well in advance and to regulate
their production and monitor timely supply of seeds, fertilizers and pesticides, farm implements and
credit to farmers. The DOA also performs statutory functions under various acts and regulations to
ensure supply of quality inputs i.e., seeds, fertilizers and pesticides to farmers and quality of outputs.
The DOA also carries out certain other facilitating functions including; soil testing, soil and water
conservation, soil survey, credit assessment/provision, media production, training to farmers,
monitoring and evaluation, disaster management, crop insurance, agricultural mechanization and
extending technical assistance to various agencies. However, it is critical to note that the activities of
the DOA are directed at „rural‟ agricultural production. UPA currently falls outside the mandate of
the DOA.
3.1.5 Department of Horticulture (DOH)
The objectives of the DOH are to provide holistic growth in horticulture through research, technology
promotion, extension and marketing; to enhance horticulture production in Andhra Pradesh to 300
million t yr-1
by 2011-12; to establish convergence and synergy among various ongoing and planned
programs and to promote the development and dissemination of technologies by blending traditional
wisdom and frontier knowledge. Further details can be found at http://www.aponline.gov.in.
The strategies adopted by the DOH to achieve the stated objectives include the adoption of an end to
end approach covering production, post harvest management, processing and marketing; the
promotion of R&D of technologies for production, post harvest management processing in potential
belts/clusters; to enhance acreage, coverage and productivity in potential belts/clusters; to facilitate
capacity building and human resource development and to promote where appropriate, National Dairy
Development Board (NDDB) model of cooperatives among horticultural producers.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
In addition, the Andhra Pradesh DOH has a Horticulture Training Institute the objectives of which are
to; identify the training needs of the department; have a significant impact in service training to
technical staff of the DOH with regards modern technologies in different sectors of horticulture, to
provide high impact training to progressive horticulture farmers of the State of Andhra Pradesh and to
provide professional training to private individuals and businesses on value added ornamental
horticulture. In the 1980‘s the DOH actively promoted UPA at the direct request of municipal
stakeholders including the State Railway Employees and within the Military Cantonment areas. The
DOH provided ‗mini kits‘ including seed and fertilizers and provided training. The key constraint to
the continued (Personal communication with the Horticulture Commissioner Mr. Anil Punetha)
adoption and expansion of this program was the perceived lack of space within urban areas. This is
currently being addressed by the RUAF-CFF Project (Section 3.3).
3.1.6 Department of Animal Husbandry Dairying and Fisheries (DADF)
The Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying (AH&D) - now renamed as Department of
Animal Husbandry Dairying & Fisheries (DADF) is a Department in the Ministry of Agriculture and
came into existence in, 1991, by converting two divisions of the Department of Agriculture and
Cooperation namely Animal Husbandry and Dairy Development into a separate Department. The
Fisheries Division of the Department of Agriculture and Cooperation and a part of the Ministry of
Food Processing Industries were later transferred to this Department in 1997. The Department is
responsible for matters relating to livestock production, preservation, protection from disease and
improvement of stocks and dairy development, and also for matters relating to the Delhi Milk Scheme
and the National Dairy Development Board. It also looks after all matters pertaining to fishing and
fisheries, inland and marine. The Department advises State Governments/Union Territories in the
formulation of policies and programmes in the field of Animal Husbandry, Dairy Development and
Fisheries. The main thrust areas are:
Development of requisite infrastructure in States/UTs for improving productivity,
Preservation and protection of livestock through provision of health care,
Strengthening of Central livestock farms (Cattle, Sheep and Poultry) for development of superior
germ plasm for distribution to states and,
Expansion of Aquaculture in fresh & brackish water, and welfare of fisher-folk etc.
Registered dairies (under the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act 1955 amended under Andhra
Pradesh Ordinance No. 17 of 1996) can avail of the services provided by the DADF.
3.2 Policies and legal aspects concerning UPA and Producer Organizations
Escalating land prices in HUA are ensuring that land is increasingly being purchased by property
developers. As indicated in Section 2.2 small landowners in the green fodder production area in Uppal
are selling their land or leasing their land to migrants from rainfed rural areas of AP. Linked to the
escalating land prices and loss of agricultural land HUDA and MCH is actively enforcing the Urban
Land Sealing Act of 1976 which limits urban plot size to 4,000 sq ft (370 m2). This fall under the
‗Musi Beautification Program‘. Briefly, ‗beautification‘ work is proposed to be taken up along the 15
km stretch of the Musi River by dividing it into two zones – a Garden Zone and a Heritage Zone. The
Garden Zone comprising 1600 acres will be developed into an area with gardens, landscaping, parks,
amusement, art plaza, food courts, open auditorium for cultural events and a golf course. The Heritage
Zone, while protecting heritage buildings like High Court, Salar Jung Museum, City Library and
Osmania General Hospital, will be developed into a tourist spot with shopping complexes. HUDA
acquisition of land to facilitate the ‗Musi Beautification Scheme‘ is set at a rate of Rs 800 per sq yard
(85,098 US$ per acre). This is in contrast to the land prices outlined in Table 2 and has result in
significant conflict between landowners and HUDA. The land designated under the ‗Musi
Beautification Program‘ is currently under paragrass cultivation and provides an input to the green
fodder market. Loss of 1600 acres may result in a potential loss of 125,168 – 150, 201 t yr-1
of
paragrass (7.823 t per acre x 1600 acres x 10-12 cuts).
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
This accounts for approximately 63.3% of the annual paragrass yield. This poses a significant threat
to the formal and informal urban dairy industry in Hyderabad. A further pressure on the area under
fodder production is the rapid conversion to leafy vegetables as stated in Section 2.1.1 the area under
leafy vegetable production along the Musi River has increased from 5.562 ha in 2002 to 16.017 ha in
2006. (Figures 2 and 3). This corresponds to a loss in the area available for paragrass production of
10.455 ha and an annual loss of 231 tonnes (19.322 t per cut as 12 cuts x 10.455 ha) of fodder entering
the fodder market.
As indicated in Section 3.1 MCH is currently enforcing several Acts under the HMC Act 1955 that
directly impact on small and medium scale urban dairy producers. Specifically, Section 407 of HMC
Act 1955 (amended under Andhra Pradesh Ordinance No. 17 of 1996) animals (Milch Cows and
Buffalos) should not be tethered on streets or other public utility places. Under Section 510/511, no
person shall keep any animal on his premises, so as to be a nuisance or danger to any person or stabled
animals. Section 540 prohibits the import of cattle into the city without prior permission in writing of
the Commissioner.
In pursuance of provisions under section 623, permission is required to run urban dairy units as per by-
laws 1964. Permissions to keep dairy animals are accorded vide a license obtained from MCH which
operates under conditions 1-15 of the 1964 by-law including; prohibition to run dairy or cattle sheds
within 200 m of any human habitation or plot of land approved for residential building construction,
dairy unit must provide sufficient open space within boundary and number of cattle to be kept as per
the prescribed floor space. These conditions are to ensure public safety, health and convenience. If a
dairy owner is unable provide the aforementioned conditions laid down in the 1964 by-laws no license
is issued. Consequently, the owner is called upon to either obtain a license by fulfilling all the
conditions required or to shift the livestock outside the city premises within one month from the date
of receipt of notice. If the owner does not comply, MCH will relocate the livestock at the owners risk
and cost.
In addition in 1996 in support of Andhra Pradesh Ordinance No. 17 the Commissioner of Police,
Hyderabad issued the following notification (No. TR.T5/938/96: Office of the Commissioner of Police
Hyderabad City (Date: 3.4.1996) to persons running private, dairy farms that in order to ensure smooth
flow of traffic and to prevent obstruction and inconvenience to the public the straying of cattle in any
street or trespassing upon any private or government property including on to the roads within the twin
cities of Hyderabad and Secunderabad is prohibited at any time, day or night. Any such cattle found
straying in the streets will be seized by the police and impounded in the cattle pound. Further,
notification in 2004 (No.TR.T5/1761/2004: Office of the Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City
Date 29.08.2004) specifies the cost of ‗lifting‘ and feeding charges during the 10 day period of
impoundment. Any animal not claimed after 10 days is auctioned and the proceeds enter the MCH
budget. However, it is critical to note that this is a ‗complaint driven process‘ with fines ranging from
300 Rs to 1000 Rs (6.5 – 22 US$) for the 1st to 3
rd offence, respectively. Consumer demand for ‗fresh
milk in HUA is estimated as 400,000 l d-1
(Section 2.1.2) as supplied by private vendors and small
dairy farms (<10 head) located within the HUA. This is a considerable demand that drives the existing
system.
A further externality influencing the long-term stability of urban ‗fresh milk‘ production system is that
the milk is unprocessed and ‗non-branded‘. The Government Policy is to promote the ‗branding‘ of
milk and processing/treatment prior to retail as a means of ensuring milk quality. This is supported by
the Prevention of Food Adulteration (PFA) Rules (1995) which stipulates x7 types of processed milk
for retail. Further, milk/dairy products are covered under the Essential Commodities Act (1955) which
has special provision for milk and dairy products as an essential commodity. The Indian Government
recognizes that in the formal dairy sector, that since the global market has become more demanding in
terms of quality, safety and timely delivery, installation of the ISO 9000 Quality Management System
and HACCP by the food industry is essential for getting a competitive international edge. In addition,
media promotion is targeting housewives to purchase ISO 9000 Quality Assured milk.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
There are a two key State policies indirectly supporting the formation of LIPOs in UPA namely the AP
Mutually Aided Coop Society Act (1995) and the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2002. The former act
was formed to provide for the voluntary formation of cooperative societies in the state of Andhra
Pradesh, India. This enactment was the final step in an effort to create a new legislative environment
for cooperatives in Andhra Pradesh. The Act provides for the voluntary formation of cooperative
societies as accountable, competitive, self reliant business enterprises, based on thrift, self-help and
mutual aid and managed and controlled by members for their economic and social betterment and
other matters connected. The latter act actively promotes the formation of ‗Producer Companies‘. Full
details of both the AP Mutually Aided Coop Society Act (1995) and the Companies (Amendment)
Act, 2002 can be found in Annex 9 and 10.
Further, with regards access to credit, all banks in India must follow RBI (Reserve Bank of India)
Rules which stipulate that 30-45% of all funds retained by the bank must be issued as loans to the
agricultural sector and/or though microfinance programs for cooperatives, urban joint liability groups
or SHGs. This is closely supported by the AP Mutually Aided Coop Society Act (1995) and the
Companies (Amendment) Act, 2002 (Annex 9 and 10).
3.3 Overview of UPA innovations in the city
IWMI www.iwmi.org is currently coordinating two initiatives in Hyderabad. The objective of
the IDRC/DGIS funded Cities Farming for the Future programme (RUAF-CFF) is to contribute to
poverty reduction, food security (encompasses year round availability, accessibility and affordability
of „safe‟ and nutritious food, improved urban environmental management (safe reuse of urban organic
waste and wastewater), empowerment of urban and peri-urban farmers and participatory city
governance. This is to be achieved through capacity development of local stakeholders in urban and
peri-urban agriculture and by facilitating participatory and multi-stakeholder policy formulation and
action planning. The RUAF-CFF (Cities Farming for the Future) is a global initiative, which aims to
facilitate the integration of UPA in the policies and programmes of national and local governments,
technical departments, research centers and NGO‘s www.ruaf.org. RUAF-CFF specifically aims to
improve access of local stakeholders in urban and peri urban agriculture to documented
experiences in crop production, forestry, and animal production, improved land use and the re-use of
urban wastes for productive purposes. It also aims to enhance the awareness of international, national
organizations and local governments of the potentials (and risks) of UPA through capacity
development with the objective of enabling practical policy and technology interventions. IWMI is
the South and Southeast Asia Coordinator of the RUAF-CFF Project.
The RUAF-CFF Project will directly contribute to achieving MDGs (1 & 7). To realize this objective,
the programme seeks to apply an integrated approach with six components, which mutually reinforce
each other and in combination will deliver the desired results.
1. Consolidation of the regional RUAF‟s: Strengthen the actual ―regional focal points on UPA‖ in
order to create sustainable and effective Regional Resource centers on UPA that provide
information services, training and policy advice to municipalities, NGO‘s and other national and
local stakeholders in urban agriculture in their region.
2. Capacity Development: Development of required training capacity and organisation of training
activities to enhance the capacities of local stakeholders in UPA (Municipal Departments, farmer
organisations, NGO‘s, research institutes, planners) for the successful engagement in multi-
stakeholder policy design and action planning and implementation on UPA.
3. Knowledge management: Design and targeted distribution of guidelines, information packages,
working methodologies and instruments by the various local stakeholders and improvement of
their access to relevant information as well as maintenance of databases and publication of Urban
Agriculture Magazine.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
4. Facilitation of Participatory Policy formulation and Action planning: Assist in the realisation of
processes of multi-stakeholder policy formulation and action planning including the realisation of
policy awareness seminars, participatory appraisals, participatory design and implementation of
pilot projects.
5. Gender mainstreaming: Ensure that training, policy formulation, project development and
monitoring activities are gender sensitive by integration of gender in all RUAF methodologies and
instruments, training activities, and gender differentiated project design and monitoring systems as
well as by commissioning gender case studies and preparation of guidelines and publications on
gender and UPA).
6. Promotion of learning through monitoring: Ensure that all local actors participating in the
programme start using participatory and results oriented process and impacts monitoring methods.
A fundamental component of the RUAF-CFF is to establish a Multi-stakeholder Process for Action
planning and Policy Design (MPAP) that will create an equitable and mutually acceptable policy
environment for UPA. In Hyderabad a series of activities have been initiated to facilitate this process
namely the formation of a UPA Enabling Team, generic and targeted capacity building programs,
exchange visits, policy awareness seminars and formation of actions plans for the implementation of
pilot projects. For further detail refer to the RUAF-CFF South and Southeast Asia website
http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/southasia/ruaf/about.html.
The risk to producer, consumer and environmental health and the economic tradeoffs and benefits of
wastewater activities in selected study sites along the Musi River are currently being investigated by
IWMI and collaborating partners. The BMZ funded project entitled ―Ensuring Health and Food Safety
from Rapidly Expanding Wastewater Irrigation in South Asia‖ will develop, implement, validate and
promote the uptake of a set of risk mitigation options (multi-barrier approaches) based on a
comprehensive assessment of risks and benefits associated with wastewater irrigation. These options
will be evaluated in the context of WHO and FAO wastewater re-use guidelines. Close collaboration is
being established with relevant city partners particularly HMWSSB (Section 5.1) to ensure input,
adoption and institutionalization of project outputs.
Chapter 4. Organization Profile: Producers’ Collective 4.1 Context of Origin
Till the beginning of the 1960s, the agricultural fields alongside the Musi River continued to grow
paddy, sorghum, millet and vegetables, both for household and market consumption. Three crops were
grown with the help of irrigation water from Musi River. After the mid sixties, as the inflow of
untreated wastewater in the River Musi increased, it became increasingly unsuitable for these crops
particularly in the Uppal area. The affected farmers thus had to search for alternate crops. It was felt
that fodder crops would be the best alternative. Regarding the introduction of paragrass (Gramineae
Panicum purpurascens) variety of fodder on these fields, there are two different versions available
from the farmers interviewed.7 The first indicates that after informal consultations with farmers in and
around city, they came to know that a particular variety of grass was being grown in similar
wastewater irrigated areas in Bombay. Alternatively a group of farmers, while exploring different
fodder grass varieties went to Punjab Agricultural University Campus at Ludhiana and brought a few
samples of fodder grass from there. Out of these varieties, paragrass was discovered to be most
suitable for feeding to dairy cattle, as it gave the best milk yield among the fodder grass varieties tried
out in the area.
7 The versions were provided by elderly farmers, who had witnessed the change from paddy and vegetables to
paragrass. These farmers were also actively involved in the formation of the Green Grass Growers‘ Association,
based at Uppal. It was not possible to validate either of the versions from other members due to the fact that the
farmers from the older generation were not available for comment. Some have died, while others have given up
farming and have settled elsewhere.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
In addition, it was found to tolerate the declining water quality and require nominal labour inputs.
After successful trials by some farmers, the entire agricultural belt in the Uppal area and also the
Attapur area took up paragrass cultivation on the wastewater irrigated agricultural lands.
4.2 Brief Historical Description
4.2.1 Collective Activity by Paragrass Producers
By the end of the 1960s, the entire Uppal belt had come under paragrass cultivation. While there were
informal consultations and information sharing among the farmers in the entire process of exploration
of new fodder grass varieties and other related areas, there was no formal forum or organization to
undertake these activities. Limited support was provided by government line agencies. Moreover, the
above-mentioned initiatives were taken mostly by the entrepreneurial larger landowners in the area.
The next common concern was to search for a suitable and stable market. As indicated by one dairy
owner, there were more than 40,000 milch animals within HUA at that time. Thus the farmers began
to look for a market place in the city area. After mutual discussions, it was decided that an association
of the fodder producers be formed to take up the activities including the search for a suitable market
place and negotiations with dairy owners and brokers. The ‗Green Grass Growers Association‘ was
thus formed. The market place came to be arranged on an open private land space in Chaderghat area
in what is now known as the old city.
The Association also took up the issue of multiple ‗taxation‘8 of fodder vehicles on their way to the
market. However, once the market was identified and the daily fodder trading process streamlined,
there was no attempt to formally register the Association or to take up any further activities through
the forum. The fodder market continued in the Chaderghat area till 1982, when the land owners asked
them to vacate. The brokers and some of the fodder grass producers searched and held discussions at
several places in the city area for another market place. Finally, the Waqf Board of the Masjid
(Mosque) situated at Golnaka area in Kacheguda agreed to lease the current open space, adjoining the
Masjid to them9 on an annual basis. Since then the fodder grass market has been functioning from the
Golnaka market, on an area of around 2,500 m2. Since 1982 onwards, the fodder producers and
brokers had also been seeking government support for sanction of a permanent market place for the
fodder market in the city area.
Around the mid nineties, the market place again came under threat as a result of a bi-law issued by the
Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad (MCH). This bi-law, prohibits the movement of buffalo, bullock
carts, rickshaws, tongas and fodder transportation vehicles due to their nuisance to traffic and
discharge of manure onto city streets. In the wake of this renewed common threat, the collective action
among the producers and brokers again gained momentum. By this time, most of the farmers who had
been associated with the Green Grass Growers Association had either given up agriculture or had
settled elsewhere. Most of them have sold part of their lands and given the remaining land on lease to
the existing active fodder producers. There were more young producers in the age-group of 22-35,
who were now cultivating their own lands and/or leased lands of other land owners. A high court order
was obtained stayed the pressure imposed by MCH to vacate the existing market location. The group
of farmers obtained formal and informal legal advice and as a result they were advised to form an
organization to collectively pursue their interests. Thus the active producers formed a new
organization named the ‗Farmers Green Paragrass Growing Society‘. It remained active in 1998 and in
1999 was registered under the AP Societies Registration Act. The major objective of the society was
to seek government land for the formal establishment of a green fodder market. The new organization
met and presented their case to concerned government officials in the Agricultural Department and
MCH. Finally, the Agricultural Market Committee agreed to allot a vacant government plot of 2982
m2 adjacent to the Old Slaughter House (known as Kacheguda Kamela) located at Golnaka which
comes under the jurisdiction of Mandal Revenue Officer (MRO) Himayathnagar village.
8 Both toll tax and the bribes collected by police and revenue officials.
9 The area is leased to Mr. Arif, who is a fodder grass broker. However, all the other brokers are equally involved
in the maintenance of the market place and the trading activity.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
However, there are several problems associated with the usage of the allotted plot for fodder market.
Firstly, there are municipal pipelines going from below the plot and thus in case if any repairs are
required, the digging up and repair activity would require the stalling of business. Secondly, the
approach road to the allotted plot from the market passes through a Basti whose residents are objecting
to the market place as it would involve heavy traffic of vehicles, rickshaws etc and also leading to
cleanliness problems. Thirdly, with a change in state government, support for the producers declined.
Another recent development affecting the farmer producers in the Uppal area is the threat of land
acquisition by Hyderabad Urban Development Authority (HUDA) as part of the Musi Beautification
Program. This has led to the formation of a new collective association known as the ‗Uppal Raithu
Sangam‘ which is also in the process of being registered under the AP Societies Registration Act
(2001). The objective of the ‗Uppal Raithu Sangam‘ is to represent the interests of farmers who will be
directly or indirectly affected by the land acquisition process and negotiate with the government to
exempt their lands from the acquisition process. The farmers are at present actively involved in
mobilization of public opinion on the issue and highlighting the issue through the media and other
forums.
4.2.2 Producer Organization Profile
Thus since the fodder grass cultivation was introduced along the Musi River three organizations have
been formed at different points in time. The following section attempts to analyze the collective
organizations on different parameters:
Parameter Green Grass Growers
Association
Farmers Green Para
Grass Growing’ Society
Uppal Raithu Sangam
Formation 1968 1996 2005
Legal Status Not registered AP Societies Registration
Act
Registration in process
Membership
profile
Land Owners and Grass
Growers
Grass Growers Small (< 2cres) to large(>5
acres) land owners
Geographic
Location of
members
Uppal area 20 villages in Ghatkesar
Mandal
Land owners affected by the
land acquisition plan related
to the ‗Musi Beautification
Program‘ of HUDA in the
Uppal area
Purpose /
Objectives
-Establishment of a market
place for fodder trading
-Negotiations with brokers
and buyers for terms of
purchase
-Establishing norms for
market operational issues
-Negotiating with
government for tax
exemption and reducing
harassment
-Representation to the
government for
permanent market place
with maintenance
facilities to be provided
by the government
-Lobbying for exemption of
land from acquisition by
HUDA
Activities
undertaken
- Market place established at
Chaderghat
- Fodder trading system put
in place- including no. of
brokers, rate determination,
payments
- Government permission to
pay a monthly charge to the
concerned department in
return for permission to
transport fodder grass daily
- Government Land
allocated for new market
- Further negotiations
stalled due to various
problems and non-
cooperation and delays
from concerned
government departments
and district administration
-Representation made to
ministers and Central
Government (Sri Digvijay
Singh)
- Highlighting the issue in
media through articles and
interviews
Bye Laws or
Norms
-Not made -Not available -Not made till date
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
Parameter Green Grass Growers
Association
Farmers Green Para
Grass Growing’ Society
Uppal Raithu Sangam
Governing Body - Office bearers elected by
mutual consensus
-No formal or clear definition
of roles and responsibilities
- Office bearers elected
by mutual consensus s
-No formal or clear
definition of roles and
responsibilities
- Office bearers elected by
mutual consensus
-No formal or clear
definition of roles and
responsibilities
Managerial
Structure
-No separate operating or
managerial structure
-All activities undertaken by
the governing body together
as a team
-No separate operating or
managerial structure
-All activities undertaken
by the governing body
together as a team
-No separate operating or
managerial structure
-All activities undertaken by
the governing body together
as a team
Decision
Making
mechanisms
Informal consultations among
the active members and the
office bearers
Informal consultations
among the active
members and the office
bearers
Informal consultations
among the active members
and the office bearers
Meetings and
Participation
1-2 meetings held in the
beginning at the time of
formation
-Informal meetings at the
village level and at the
Golnaka market
-Active participation of
brokers also
- No regular meetings
held. When some issue
comes up, members are
informed to come for
discussions
-1-2 formal meetings till date
Involvement of
Women
No women members or office
bearers
No women members or
office bearers or brokers
No women members or
office bearers
Interests-
common and
conflicting,
solidarity
-Group formed on common
interest
- No conflicting interests
among producers came up
during period of active
functioning
-Different political
affiliations were one of the
reasons for not taking up
further activities from the
forum
- Group formed on
common interests
-Formed on common interest
and common political
affiliations
- No involvement of farmers
whose lands not affected and
with different political
affiliation
Funds and
Resources for
the organization
Internally mobilized from
members for expenses. No
formal records maintained
Active office bearers
make expenses. After the
amount becomes
considerable, they orally
detail about the expenses
and collect per head
contribution from willing
members and brokers
No information. As per the
office bearers, they are
bearing the entire expense on
their own
Infrastructure,
inputs and
services for the
organization
-No infrastructure owned or
rented by the org.
-Contribution for
maintenance of premises by
both producers and brokers.
Overseen by the brokers
-No infrastructure owned
by org. or producers
- Contribution for
premises rent and
maintenance of premises
by both producers and
brokers. Cleaning and
maintenance overseen by
the brokers
- Legal services hired
- No infrastructure owned by
the organization services
- Legal services hired from
outside
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
Parameter Green Grass Growers
Association
Farmers Green Para
Grass Growing’ Society
Uppal Raithu Sangam
from outside
Partnership with
other actors
- For Golnaka market
general maintenance,
contributions are provided
by all shop owners inc.
them
-
-Media and political party
workers and office bearers
Strategies for
future access to
resources/
markets
- Representation to
government
- Follow up with
government departments
- Agitation and lobbying
with the government
- Litigation
Chapter 5. Conclusions and Recommendations
5.1 Long-term trends in UPA in Hyderabad:
As stated previously, UPA activities in Hyderabad fall outside of conventional research and
institutional support mechanisms. It is practiced in small spatially scattered locations without
supporting policies or guidelines by small-and medium scale farmers but contributes to the urban food
supply primarily in the form of perishable vegetables, green fodder and dairy products (dominated by
fresh milk). Key constraints to the institutionalization and indeed widescale adoption of UPA activites
include;
Lack of awareness amongst the public, NGOs, Government Departments and private sector on the
potential benefits of UPA.
Availability of land and escalating land prices
Lack of supporting policies
Intense competition for available water resources
Lack of an institutional home for UPA
Lack of a centralized source of essential resources for UPA namely; seed, fertilizer, growth
medium, tools, no space/low space technologies.
Lack of capacity in line agencies (particularly DOH) directed specifically at UPA
Lack of targeted (targeted to different socio-economic groups) training materials for the
cultivation, value added processing and marketing of UPA commodities.
With the exception of urban dairies, there is a lack of formal/informal locally available (planned
and implemented through multi-stakeholder action planning activities) bright spots demonstrating
the viability of UPA activities.
5.1.1 Supportive Policies
However, there are a number of government policies actively indirectly support the formation of
LIPOs in UPA namely the AP Mutually Aided Coop Society Act (1995) and the Companies
(Amendment) Act, 2002. The former act was formed to provide for the voluntary formation of
cooperative societies in the state of Andhra Pradesh, India. This enactment was the final step in an
effort to create a new legislative environment for cooperatives in Andhra Pradesh. The Act provides
for the voluntary formation of cooperative societies as accountable, competitive, self reliant business
enterprises, based on thrift, self-help and mutual aid and managed and controlled by members for their
economic and social betterment and other matters connected. The latter act actively promotes the
formation of ‗Producer Companies‘. Full details of both the AP Mutually Aided Coop Society Act
(1995) and the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2002 can be found in Annex 8.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
5.1.2 Access to Credit
With regards access to credit, all banks in India must follow RBI (Reserve Bank of India) Rules which
stipulate that 30-45% of all funds retained by the bank must be issued as loans to the agricultural
sector and/or though microfinance programs for cooperatives, urban joint liability groups or SHGs.
This is closely supported by the AP Mutually Aided Coop Society Act (1995) and the Companies
(Amendment) Act, 2002 (Annex 9). In India in 2005, 14 million poor families had access to micro
finance through 881,154 SHGs (90% SHGs are all women) linked to over 30,000 branches of 504
banks comprising commercial banks, regional rural banks and cooperative banks (Source:
Presentation of Ms Ranjana Kumari - NABARD Chairperson at Micro credit summit in Dhaka on 16th
February 2004). It is estimated that in 2005, almost 260 million people in India were living under the
internationally accepted poverty line of 1 US$ a day. Adjusted for the purchasing power, some 39% of
India's population would be considered as poor. The Government of India, since independence, has
been making concerted efforts to provide financial services to the poor at affordable cost. Despite all
these efforts, there still exists a massive gap between the demand for credit by poor households and the
supply of credit by formal financial and social institutions.
Of the 75 million poor households in India, (60 million rural households and 15 million urban
households), it is estimated that the total annual requirement of credit for rural households would be at
least Rs. 120 billion (2.6 billion US$) on the basis of Rs. 2000 (43.9 US$) per family. Another
estimate for micro finance services, excluding housing, is Rs. 500 billion (10.9 billion US$) assuming
that annual average credit usage is Rs. 6000 (131 US$) per rural poor household and Rs. 9000 (197
US$) per urban poor household. In addition, the clients require saving and insurance services. The
dependence of poor on informal and non-institutional sources of credit still remains very high. For
further details refer to www.sidbi.com. Concerted efforts are required to ensure that UPA and related
producer organizations are able to access, micro-credit.
5.1.3 Access to water resources With regards water resources, it is currently mandatory in Hyderabad for all new constructions to have
a rainwater harvesting structure either in the form of groundwater re-charge or water conservation.
This is managed by HMWSSB. In addition, HMWSSB in association with the National River
Conservation Directorate (NRCD) is undertaking the ‗Musi River Conservation Project‘. The project
area covers the entire MCH area of 169.3 km2 and Uppal and Malkajigiri Municipalities, Osmania
University and Cantonment Areas in full and part of 5 surrounding Municipalities namely; L.B. Nagar,
Rajendranagar, Kukatpally, Qutubullapur and Kapra Municipalities. The extent of the Musi River
Conservation Project sewerage project area 363.43 km2. Current wastewater generated within the
proposed sewerage project area is 644.2 MLD. Project involves up-grading/construction of 5 Sewage
Treatment Plants (STP) at Jiaguda, Nandi Musaliaguda, Amberpet, Nagole and Nallah Cheruvu.
Design treatment capacities are given in Table 4.
Table 4. Design treatment capacities of the five Sewage Treatment Plants (STP) covered by the Musi
River Conservation Project Name of STP Treatment Capacity
(MLD)
Jiaguda 21
Nandi Musaliaguda 30
Amberpet 339
Nagole 171
Nallah Cheruvu 30
Total 591
The WHO, has ranked the risk of pathogens found in untreated and partially treated wastewater in the
following descending order: helminth infections, protozoa/bacteria and viruses with viruses posing
almost negligible risk. Helminth infections are mainly due to: Ascaris lumbricoides (roundworm),
Trichuris trichiura (whipworm), Ancylostoma duodenale and Nector americanus (hookworms).
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
However, it is important to note that helminth egg levels were not determined as an indicator of water
quality during the feasibility study for the Musi River Conservation Project and are not included in the
Water Quality Standards for Surface Water Sources (Central Pollution Control Board 2001).
Composite wastewater samples of dry weather flow from all nallahs and the existing Amberpet STP
were analyzed following NRCD guidelines and presented in Table 5. However, IWMI water quality
monitoring at selected points along the Musi River from 2004-2006 are given in Table 6. With the
exception of sampling points at Pillaipally and Battigudem Total (Ascaris, Hookworm and Trichuris)
helminth egg counts exceed the WHO guideline value of <1 egg l-1
. Disposal Standards for the
treatment plants as stipulated by the NRCD are BOD <30 mg l-1
, TSS <50 mg l-1
and Fecal Coliforms
<10,000 MPN/ 100ml. This complies with the revised WHO guideline value of < 104 (MPN per
100ml) for restricted irrigation in labour intensive agriculture (protective of adults and children <
15yrs). This would be a significant improvement on the current water quality parameters measured by
IWMI and NRCD and should have a direct and positive impact on the health of producers, produce
quality and hence consumer health risks.
Table 5. Composite dry weather flow wastewater quality attributes for selected STPs and nallah‟s
covered under the Musi River Conservation Project‘.
Location Parameters
Flow
(MLD) pH
DO
(mg l-1
)
TDS
(mg l-1
)
BOD
(mg l-1
)
COD
(mg l-1
)
Fecal Coliform
MPN / 100 ml 105
Amberpet
Amberpet STP inlet 192.00 7.01 ND 1406 314 602 2.600
Amberpet STP Outlet 7.07 ND 1412 214 458 2.900
Puranapul North 2.50 6.85 ND 1042 191 453 5.625
Puranapul North 12.00 5.98 ND 1186 291 663 5.050
Surplus Nullah 76.00 7.02 ND 1247 246 580 6.700
Afzalsagar nullah 16.00 7.00 ND 1189 180 415 4.700
Patel Nagar nullah 6.00 6.98 ND 984 246 576 6.200
Nagole
Puranapul South 3.00 6.87 ND 1017 151 338 2.950
High Court Nullah 7.00 6.98 ND 1036 198 457 3.575
Muriki Nullah 34.00 6.97 ND 977 240 569 3.725
Nagole Main 8.50 6.95 ND 1073 187 459 4.950
Mansoorabad Main 3.90 7.20 ND 1028 204 499 5.075
SIS Main 42.00 7.30 ND 1224 231 566 4.950
Nallacheruvu
Ramanthapur Nullah 7.00 6.78 ND 1167 303 710 4.325
Peddacheruvu Nullah 12.00 7.12 ND 1431 170 400 2.100
Jiaguda STP ND
Bapughat Nullah 9.00 7.24 ND 1039 159 314 4.975
Mukalla Nullah 5.00 7.00 ND 1240 198 431 6.425
Nandi Muslaiguda
Bahadurpura Nullah 21.00 6.80 ND 1195 243 562 4.525
Kishen Bagh 3.00 6.40 ND 1885 282 576 5.875
The risk to producer, consumer and environmental health and the economic tradeoffs and benefits of
wastewater activities in selected study sites along the Musi River are currently being investigated by
IWMI and collaborating partners. The BMZ funded project entitled ―Ensuring Health and Food Safety
from Rapidly Expanding Wastewater Irrigation in South Asia‖ will develop, implement, validate and
promote the uptake of a set of risk mitigation options (multi-barrier approaches) based on a
comprehensive assessment of risks and benefits associated with wastewater irrigation. These options
will be evaluated in the context of WHO and FAO wastewater re-use guidelines.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
Close collaboration is being established with relevant city partners particularly HMWSSB to ensure
input, adoption and institutionalization of project outputs.
Table 6. Water quality attributes at selected sampling points along the Musi River December 2003 –
January 2005 (Ensink, 2006). Sampling
Location
Distance (km)
downstream from
Hyderabada
DO
(mg l-1
)
BOD5
(mg l-1
)
EC
dS m-1
Totalb
Helminth Egg
Count Eggs l-1
E.Colic
(CFU 100 ml-1
)
Amberpet 0
0.1
(0.08)
325
(33.5)
1.52
(0.055)
58.41
(13.15)
8.07 x 107
(4.9 x107)
Nagole 5.2
0.12
(0.07)
317
(39.0)
1.84
(0.085)
53.24
(12.61)
2.94 x 107
(1.6 x107)
Peerzadiguda 9.6
0.12
(0.075)
162
(24.0)
2.03
(0.10)
28.47
(5.20)
3.81 x 107
(2.7 x107)
Mutialguda 13.9
0.12
(0.08)
95
(17.0)
2.00
(0.10)
10.71
(4.26)
2.70 x 105
(1.6 x105)
Gourvelli 17.3
0.23
(0.125)
73
(26.5)
1.96
(0.10)
6.18
(1.60)
1.53 x 105
(5.3 x104)
Koremalla 20.0
1.12
(0.505)
54
(9.0)
1.98
(0.105)
1.88
(2.86)
1.43 x 105
(6.3 x104)
Pillaipally 27.7
3.03
(0.675)
31
(10.0)
1.99
(0.09)
0.41
(0.85)
1.22 x 105
(3.8 x104)
Battigudem 39.7 5.00
(0.82)
15
(6.5)
2.26
(0.175)
0.0
(0.0)
8.67 x 102
(2.3 x102)
aDistance Measured along the river bed
b Ascaris, Hookworm and Trichuris
cSampling undertaken from Jan. –
Jul. 2005. All other values represent mean water quality parameters based on bi-weekly sampling undertaken
from December 2003 – January 2005 (Ensink, 2006). Values in parentheses indicate 1 STDEV.
5.1.4 Marketing
With the exception of the wastewater irrigated leafy vegetables, it is envisaged that the marketing
(formal and informal) of agricultural products generated by urban and peri-urban producers will not be
problematic given the high demand and the existing and emerging market channels outlined in Section
3.1.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
5.2 Conclusions and lessons learned
Rapid urbanization creates tremendous challenges in the provision of infrastructure, employment,
environmental management, food security, nutrition and health. Among the many challenges, one of
basic and crucial challenge that remains is ensuring food and nutritional security within the urban
zone. In this context urban and peri-urban agriculture (UPA) can make significant contributions.
However, currently in Hyderabad UPA and consequently, LIPOs fall outside of conventional research,
institutional and funding support mechanisms. It is practiced without supporting policies or guidelines
by small-and medium scale farmers but contributes to the urban food supply primarily in the form of,
green fodder and dairy products (dominated by fresh milk) and increasingly, perishable vegetables.
Several key externalities are directly impacting on the long-term sustainability of peri-urban green
fodder production and small scale urban dairies in Hyderabad. Escalating land prices in the current
green fodder production areas ensure that land is increasingly being purchased for property
development. Linked to the escalating land prices and loss of agricultural HUDA and MCH are
actively implementing the ‗Musi Beautification Program‘ which when completed will encroach on
1,600 acres currently under green fodder production. This is expected to result in a 63% reduction in
fodder (Paragrass) entering the green fodder market. Further, a number of Acts enforced by MCH and
issued as public notifications by the Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad are restricting small scale
urban milk producers. A further externality influencing the long-term stability of urban ‗fresh milk‘
production systems is the Government Policy to promote the ‗branding‘ of milk and
processing/treatment prior to retail as a means of ensuring milk quality and public health. This is
supported by the Prevention of Food Adulteration (PFA) Rules (1995).
With regards supportive policies, there are two key State policies indirectly supporting the formation
of LIPOs namely the AP Mutually Aided Cooperative Societies Act (1995) and the Companies
(Amendment) Act, 2002. In Hyderabad it is now mandatory for all new constructions to have a
rainwater harvesting structure either in the form of groundwater re-charge or water conservation. In
addition, HMWSSB in association with the National River Conservation Directorate (NRCD) is
undertaking the ‗Musi River Conservation Project‘. Both these initiatives are managed by HMWSSB
and will directly address a key constraint to the development of UPA in Hyderabad namely, water.
Access to credit and markets for UPA products is not seen as a constraint to UPA in Hyderabad. The
key constraints are listed in Section 5.1. These are currently being addressed by IWMI and project
partners through the RUAF-CFF Project and the BMZ funded project entitled ―Ensuring Health and
Food Safety from Rapidly Expanding Wastewater Irrigation in South Asia‖. A key lessoned learned in
undertaking this report which reiterates the findings of the aforementioned projects is that a multi-
stakeholder and multi-disciplinary approach which has strong institutional as well as ground roots
support is essential if suitable and equitable policies are to be developed that facilitate the inclusion of
UPA in long-term city planning. This must be coupled with effective knowledge management and
awareness programs that highlight the benefits of UPA as well as any risk mitigation options (where
urban solid waste or treated wastewater are utilized) that are required to ensure the production and
marketing of ‗safe‘ and nutritious food for rapidly expanding cities.
Finally, capacity building at multiple levels (policy, enablers and implementers) is critical if UPA
activities are to be productive, sustainable and adoptable.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
5.3 Recommendations
Through the RUAF-CFF Project and it is strongly recommended that;
A strong advocacy and awareness program is continued amongst civil society institutions, NGOs,
Government Departments and the private sector on the potential benefits of UPA.
A suitable and equitable environment in created that will facilitate (through a multi-stakeholder
action orientated process) the development of supporting policies.
An institutional home is found for UPA (It is envisaged that this will be the DOH). Negotiations
have already been initiated with the DOH.
Intense competition for available water resources. Rainwater harvesting and the use of treated
wastewater in associated with appropriate multi-barrier risk mitigation options is being promoted
A centralized source of essential resources for UPA namely; seed, fertilizer, growth medium,
tools, no space/low space technologies etc. is established.
Capacity of various stakeholders (particularly DOH) in UPA and allied activities continues to be
undertaken through ‗Training of Trainer‘ initiatives.
Appropriate targeted training and knowledge materials are developed
Bright Spot examples are developed to demonstrate the potential of UPA in Hyderabad. Currently,
a school garden and terrace garden/household waste separation and composting activity in a
organized colony (8th Battalion Special Police) are planned.
The Musi River Conservation Project project document clearly states that the “treated sewage from
Amberpet and Nallahceruvu STPs (369 MLD) will be discharged into the existing irrigation channels
to support the current agricultural activities”. This is a clear indication of institutional support in
terms of providing water quantity and improved water quality for fodder, vegetable and rice producers
along the Musi River. As stated above, IWMI and collaborating partners will develop, implement,
validate and promote the uptake of a set of risk mitigation options (multi-barrier approaches) based
on a comprehensive assessment of risks and benefits associated with treated wastewater irrigation.
Close collaboration is being established with relevant city partners particularly HMWSSB to ensure
input, adoption and institutionalization of project outputs.
It is strongly recommended therefore that vegetable, fodder and rice producers along the Musi River
form producer organizations. It is envisaged that the formation of such cooperative structures under
the AP Mutually Aided Coop Society Act (1995) and the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2002 (Annex
9 and 10) will safeguard their current livelihoods and form a strong basis for direct dialogue with the
HMWSSB and other line agencies. The formation of such producer organizations will also strengthen
their lobbying power for services from government line agencies.
Currently, the existing green fodder and urban dairy system particularly small urban producers is
economically viable and provides an integrated service e.g. procuring inputs, production and
marketing. Inputs are cheap and currently available at the green fodder market. The urban dairy
producers are operating in a high margin market as transport costs (and labour costs) are minimal due
to close proximity of consumers and the fodder market. Consequently, infrastructural bottle necks are
minimal. No reason economically to form a cooperative of ‗urban‘ dairy producers to reduce
production, operating and marketing costs. In addition, the current legal constraints discussed in detail
in Section 3.2 would prevent ‗un-licensed‘ urban dairy producers from highlighting their existence let
alone forming a registered organization.
However, with the increasing pressure on the land available for green fodder (paragrass) production it
is recommended that urban milk producers for a organizational structure to assist the ‗Green Fodder
Association‘ in lobbying for the protection of the existing fodder production area. Further it is
recommended that the ‗Green Fodder Association‘ and the urban dairy farmers and commercial dairy
units partner with consumers buying fresh milk to facilitate official recognition of their trade and
assure safety standards in all aspects of the production and consumption chain.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
REFERENCES
1. Andhra Pradesh Department of Agriculture (DOA) http://www.aponline.gov.in
2. Andhra Pradesh Department of Horticulture (DOH) http://www.aponline.gov.in
3. Andhra Pradesh Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries (DADF)
http://www.aponline.gov.in
4. Andhra Pradesh Mutually Aided Cooperative Societies Act (1995) www-ilo-
mirror.cornell.edu/public/english/employment/ent/coop/download/india.pdf -
5. Agriculture Produce Marketing Development and Regulation Act (2003)
6. Buechler, S. and G. Devi (2003). Wastewater as a Source of Multiple Livelihoods? A Study of a Rural Area
near Hyderabad City, Andhra Pradesh, India in Rema Devi and Naved Ahsan (eds.). Water and Wastewater:
Developing Country Perspectives. London, U.K.: International Water Association.
7. Department of Horticulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh (2006) Handbook of Horticultural Statistics
8. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Andhra Pradesh, 2001 http://www.aponline.gov.in
9. Ensink J.H.J., 2006. Wastewater use in agriculture in India; the role of irrigation infrastructure in health risk
reduction. PhD Thesis London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK
10. Essential Commodities Act (1955) http://www.indialawinfo.com/bareacts/esca.html
11. Hyderabad Urban Development Authority (HUDA) http://www.hudahyd.org
12. Hyderabad Metropolitan Water Supply and Sanitation Board (HMWSSB)
http://www.hyderabadwater.gov.in
13. India Dairy www.indiadairy.com
14. Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad (MCH) http://www.mchhyd.org
15. National Dairy Development Board, India www.nddb.org.
16. Prevention of Food Adulteration (PFA) Rules (1995) mohfw.nic.in/pfa%20acts%20and%20rules.pdf
17. Producer Companies Act, (Amendment) 2002)
http://www.laws4india.com/corporatelaws/comp_act/ica_idx.asp
18. Ramnath, N. 2002. Indian Dairy Study Opportunities in the Indian Dairy Industry. Special Report.
February. Rabobank International, Food and Agribusiness Research.
19. Reserve Bank of India (Amendment Act) (1967)
20. Staal S. 2001. The competitiveness of small-holder dairy production: evidence from Sub -Sahara Africa,
Asia and Latin America. In (Eds. D. Rangnekar and W. T. Thorpe) Small-holder dairy production and
marketing – opportunities and constraints. Proceedings of the South-South workshop held at NDDB, Anand,
India, and ILRI, Nairobi, Kenya, 538 pp.
21. World Health Organization (WHO). 2006. Health guidelines for the use of wastewater in agriculture and
aquaculture. Technical report series 778, Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
ANNEX 1: IMAGES
Figure 1. LandSat 7 (2000) indicating MCH, HUDA and Municipal Boundaries.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS: HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS: HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
IMAGES OF FODDER (PARAGRASS) CULTIVATION, HARVESTING,
TRANSPORTING, MARKETING AND USE IN DAIRY UNITS IN HYDERABAD
Fodder (paragrass) cultivation at Uppal, Hyderabad
Paragrass harvesting at Uppal, Hyedrabad
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
Paragrass transport from field to market.
Golnaka Green Fodder Market, Hyderabad
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
Urban green fodder transporter
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
ANNEX 2: AREA, POPULATION AND GROWTH OF HYDERABAD URBAN
AGGLOMERATION (1991-2001)
Source: Census of India, Andhra Pradesh & HUDA (2003)
Components of HUA Area (km
2)
2001
Population Growth Rate
(1991-01)
Density-
(Persons km2)
2001 1991 2001
A. Municipal Corporation of
Hyderabad (MCH) 172.68 3,043,896 3,612,427 18.7 20,920
B. Surrounding Municipalities
1. Alwal 26.32 66,471 93,206 40.2 3,541
2.Kapra 43.81 87747 159002 81.2 3,629
3.Kukatpally 43.12 186963 292289 56.3 6,779
4.L.B.Nagar 64.61 155514 268689 72.8 4,159
5.Malkajgiri 16.75 127178 193863 52.4 11,574
6.Qutubullapur 52.02 106591 231108 116.8 4,443
7.Rajendranagar 50.87 84520 143240 69.5 2,816
8.Serlingampally 96.99 72320 153364 112.1 1,581
9.Uppal 21.97 75644 117217 55.0 5,335
10.Gaddiannaram 2.12 35187 52835 50.2 24,922
B. Total 418.58 998135 1704813 70.8 4,073
C. Secunderabad Cantonment 40.17 171148 206102 20.4 5,131
D. Osmania University 2.85 10153 11224 10.5 3,938
E. Other Census Towns
1. Patancheru 15.06 26862 40273 49.9 2,674
2. R.C. Puram 19.28 46129 52363 13.5 2,716
3. R.C. Puram (BHEL) 11.21 17707 14815 -16.3 1,322
4. Meerpet 4.04 5089 12935 154.2 3,202
E. Total 49.59 95787 120386 25.7 2,428
F. Outgrowths (OG) 94.38 44191 62028 40.4 657
Grand Total 778.17 4,363,310 5,716,980 31.0 7347
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
ANNEX 3. THE SUPPLY AND MARKETING OF GRAINS, FRUIT AND FISH IN HYDERABAD
URBAN AGGLOMERATION: DEMAND AND SUPPLY SCENARIO
Food Grains
Rice is the staple food of Andhra Pradesh with 3,086,202 ha of land under paddy and a state wise
production of 9,601,045 t yr-1
in 2004-2005 (Directorate of Economics and Statistics AP, 2006) As far
as Hyderabad is concerned, the city depends on outside supply for more than 80-85 % of its
requirement. There is no area under paddy cultivation in the HUA. In 2004-2005 season Rangareddy
district had 29,991 ha of irrigated land under paddy cultivation (11.3% of the agricultural land area)
and produced 78,616 t of rice (Directorate of Economics and Statistics AP, 2005).
The value chain of paddy produced in the UPA is as follows:
In the peri-urban areas of Hyderabad (Rangareddy and Nalgonda districts), paddy is grown by the
producer households both for the market and for home consumption. Except for those areas along the
Musi River belt in Nalgonda District where waste water or a combination of and ground water and
wastewater is used, conjunctive rainwater/ground water is the major source of irrigation for paddy.
Fisheries
The city‘s demand for fish is met from outside the district. The supply of fish and other sea-food such
as prawns comes mainly from Machlipatnam and other districts in AP. The major wholesale market
supplying to the various city markets is located in Musheerabad. Retailers from all over the city
purchase from the Musheerabad market. More than 5,000 tonnes of fish arrive in the market daily.
There are around 100 wholesale buyers in the Musheerabad market. They purchase and in turn sell to
local retailers and also consignments are sent (mostly through rail) to different cities as far as Chennai.
Bhongiri, in Rangareddy district also supplies 5-8% of Hyderabad‘s fish demand. The local production
(in the peri-urban areas) from small ponds and local rivers is consumed at a village level. Only less
than 10 percent is taken to the nearest big town.
Fruits As far as fruits are concerned, >90 % of the city‘s requirement are met from outside. Though the
Medchal and Shamirpet belt has been a grape garden pocket for many years, the area under grape
gardens has decreased by around 50 percent. In the Medchal belt, the area is being increasingly
converted to real estate as a result of the proximity of the outer ring-road. Current land prices in
Medchal and Shamirpet are 3,533,200 Rs (77,652 US$ per acre) and 1,331,000 Rs (29,252 US$ per
acre). There has also been a shift from grape to vegetable cultivation. In Shamirpet region, more than
80 % of producer‘s previously cultivating grapes have shifted to vegetable cultivation.
Mozamjahi and Kothapet are the major fruit wholesale markets, from where the fruits are purchased
by second level wholesale agents and retailers who sell in the different markets all over the city.
Price determined by Govt.
Producer Rice Mills Wholesale traders Retailers
Milling, grading and packing Branding
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
The supply routes for some of the major fruits are shown in the following table;
Fruit Major Supply Centers to Hyderabad city
Banana Nanded (70%), East Godavari, Yellur, Anantapur (Pulinandala)
Mango East & West Godavari, Chittoor
Grape Shamirpet, Medchal (UPA of Hyderabad), Nasik, Chikballarpur
(Bangalore)
Apples Himachal Pradesh, Kashmir
Oranges Nasik and Nagpur
Pomegranates Kolhapur
Other Citrus Fruits Nalgonda, Nellore, Anantapur
Resource Base
Declining Water Table
Increased real estate rates
High cost of labour (due to rural urban
migration)
Product Characteristics: Vegetables vs.
Grapes
Faster turnover period in vegetables (2-3
months as compared to one year)
Regular cash flows
Long-term crop implies greater loss to farmer
in case of adverse climate (high risk)
Same physical structure of grapes can be used
for creeper vegetables
Market Structures:
Grapes
Limited storage facilities
Limited local market (Distance to market necessitates middlemen as self
marketing is not feasible)
Vegetables
High Demand
Greater marketing opportunities with assured market (HUA).
Producers able to bypass many levels of intermediaries & get more returns
Large number of traders facilitating transport
Cost Competitiveness of other production centres
Cost effective grape production in Nasik,
(Maharashtra), Chikballarpur (Bangalore) with better
transportation facilities
Currently, vegetable cultivation in Medchal and
Shamirpet is able to compete favorably with other
production centres
Grape vs Vegetable
Cultivation
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
ANNEX 4.
ANDHRA BARRELA CATTLE MARKET, CHINTALAKUNTA (VANASTHALIPURAM)
Andhra Barrela Cattle Market (ABM), Chintalakunta is the place where the trade of animals especially
milch animals takes place. The following information is prepared based on the observations and
discussions in the ABM.
# Focus Point Particulars
1 No. of sheds in ABM 50
2 Average no. of animals in
ABM 450-500
3 Main Activity Milch cattle trading
4 Source of the Activity Tanuku, Hundi (West Godavari Dist.), Mandapeta (East Godavari), Haryana are major
source (Krishna and Guntur Dist. Minor Source).
5 Market Season Turnover: Peak Jun – Dec @ 500 - 700 animals/ Month and Lean Dec–Jun @ 300-400
animals per Month.
6 Category of Milch cattle 90% Murra & Graded Murra Buffaloes and 10% Cows (Jersey, HF & Ongole Bred).
7 Selection process of
Source Expertise Personal visits
8 Average duration It will take one week/ 10 days time between purchase and sale of animal.
9 Feeding Para grass 4 lorries per day @ Rs 8 per 8-10 kg, Dhana 5 kg @ Rs 5-7 per kg per animal
per day & paddy straw (source Medak & Miryalaguda) 4-5 kg per day costing Rs 10 per
day per animal.
10 Vaccinations Foot & Mouth disease and de-warming to calves
11 Type of animals sold
300 calved & 200 pregnant animals (4-5 days duration) are sold per month during peak
season. During lean season only calved animals are sold.
50% of animals are sold to nearby villages. Out of this 50% are purchasing with their own
efforts and finance and 50% are for schemes and loaning purpose. The rest 50% are sold to
city market.
12 Milk sales Sold to 4-5 local vendors @ 15-20 per litre for Buffalo Milk (BM) and Rs 10-15 per Litre
for Cow milk. Some portion of milk is sold nearby as retail sales. High flexibility in milk
supply (It varies everyday).
13 Employment 2 – 5 workers per shed depending upon market season. Minimum 2 workers are always
required to carry animals from source, unloading, loading and regular maintenance. They
hire local persons if required. Pay @ Rs 3,000 PM (high due to intensity of work).
14 Regular activity Vigorous activity, at least 3 times washing, regular spot cleaning of animal place (removal
of solid waste & liquid waste), continuous feeding through out the day.
15 Institutional Support
Upto 1990, AH department has given services. After that the Dept. stopped services to
them. Now they are hiring qualified/ retired Vet. Doctors for vaccinations, surgeries,
deliveries of animals on case to case to basis and pay Rs 500- 600 per visit and nature of
service. No Insurance coverage. No support from Legal, Municipal, revenue, banks,
institution etc. (Also not required). They borrow amount if required from private financiers
@ 24% to 36%.
16 Market trends They are doing it from 1970. Now after 30 years they analysed the situation and realised
that among those who are in this business more than 30 years, 80% are losers, 10% are
gainers and remaining 10% are remained as same.
17 Market Place
Private land on hire basis @ Rs 500 per month for big shed and Rs 300 for small shed.
Altogether Rs 22,000 per month. They are able to meet this and other land maintenance by
selling solid waste (dung), price ranges from Rs 600-700-800 per lorry load. This solid
waste is mainly purchased for grape gardens. They use two bore wells (10 HP) for water
requirement for all sheds.
18 Risk Factors
Loss/ Less price in case, due to calf death in transit. (Rs 2,000 per animal)
Damages to animals during transit.
No insurance coverage (insurance companies will not cover during transit of the animal).
They may earn Rs 400 to 500 per animal if they sell it. But if one animal dies it will wash
away profit earnings of 40 animals.
Now the market is decreasing day by day as both ends not showing much interest of this
activity. They have to encash the animal within a week other wise it is a loss for them for
two reasons. One is increase in maintenance cost; decrease the price of animal
proportionately on no.of days after calving.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
19 Impact One good thing is that because of this activity they are able to educate their children upto
professional course level and able to send their children upto US.
20 Market tendency
Previously the milch cattle rearing activity was done by Yadava and Gowda community in
Hyderabad city. Now these communities are not showing much interest as now they are
shifted to lucrative real estate business. The other important factor is that previously the
cattle rearing in twin cities was mainly focussed on milk production aspect, now it is
shifted to meat production aspect. In their experience, the activity in previous days was like
this. The Yadava and Gowda community, who rear milch cattle approached them with
dried animal, sell it and buy a new milking animal on mutually agreeable terms and
conditions. The traders in ABM were sent all these dried animals to coastal Andhra to rear
there and after calving, again brought to this place and sell to the local farmers. Now this
tendency has been decreased rapidly and instead of bringing the dried animal to this place
they are selling it their place itself on out right price to the butchers for meat purpose.
Previously upto 4 years back every day at least 4-5 lorries transported animals both ways
between Hyderabad to Andhra area. The other reason for this is due to decrease of interest
on milch cattle rearing by farmer‘s community in Andhra Area. The main reason for this
problem is related to non-availability of labour in coastal Andhra.
21 Collective efforts
No association formed. How ever informal way they are managing some of the activities in
a collective way. One time they approached in a collective way to the then CM of AP Mr
NT Rama Rao due to the harassment they faced by the Market and transport check posts.
The authorities were used to threaten them for bribes. They used to stop the animal transit
vehicles for long hours. Those animals which were under transit are in pregnancy and
unable to stand long hours. Due to this they faced huge losses due to high rate of animal
and calf death during transportation. Then they approached to the CM and explained about
their problem. The then CM was immediately responded and issued an order to exempt
vehicles carrying animals from market and transport check posts. Now they are not facing
this problem.
22 SWOT
High cost of Animal (Increased cost burdening them increased risk)
Market problem
Decrease in source (Difficult to find good animal)
Loss threat always creating tension, pressure
Decrease in market from 500 animals per month to 100 animals per month
Domination of Powder milk in vendor based milk market in city.
23 Other Information
Super Dairy with 700 animals, situated behind Subhash theatre, Charminar chowrastha,
RTC ‗X‘ Roads.
Maskati Dairy with 700–1,000 animals, situated at Turka Yamzil in Sagar Road. Also at
Charminar in old city.
Other dairies having 50 – 100 animals are at Nurkhan Bazar (Jagan) and also Babu,
Lakdikapool near petrol pump (Ice factory).
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
ANNEX 5. PROFILES OF SELECTED URBAN AND PERI-URBAN DAIRY UNITS IN
HYDERABAD
SUPER DAIRY – SUCCESSFUL DAIRY FARM IN HYDERABAD CITY
Super Dairy, is one of the large dairy farms maintained well within the city limits. The following
points have emerged in the discussions with the various stakeholders -
# Focus Point Particulars
1 Main Activity Rearing of Milch cattle, Bulls, Sheep, Goat, Emoo birds, Turkey birds, Duck,
Dove, Swan, Monkey etc. Milk sales in retail. Other than milch cattle rearing
for development purpose.
2 No. of milch cattle 250
3 Category of Milch
cattle
Buffaloes: 100% Murra only.
Cows: Cross Bred Jersey 14, Ongole 30, Ongole bulls 30.
4 Average Daily milk
production
Direct milk sales 700 Lit., Curd 50 lit. Ghee 10 kg, lactation Milk (Junnu) 30
lit. per day.
5 Milk extraction system Manual
6 Employment 60 workers with one Manager named Mr Syed Mohmood Khundin. He is
working in this as manager since 19 years.
7 History They established this as private limited firm by Golconda Cigarette Co. about
27 years back.
8 Milk Marketing Retail sales by counter within the premises. Price Buffalo Milk Rs 26 per Litre.
For Hotels they charge Rs Rs 23 per Litre. For special order for more than 100
litres they charges Rs 28 per litre.
9 By products Marketing Dung Rs 1,000 per truck, if there is no demand they apply this to their
farmhouse (Mango gardens) at Vikarabad.
10 Fodder & Feeding Para Grass worth Rs 3,000 per day, fodder mix of Jowar & Maize.
Concentrated feed (Own preparation).
11 Milch cattle Source Rohtak, each Murra Buffalo costing Rs 50,000 – Rs 52,000.
12 Vaccinations Foot & Mouth disease and de-warming to calves by AH Department
13 Water Bore water supplied to tanks for drinking, washing, cleaning etc. if shortage is
there then they purchase through tankers.
14 Other establishments Generator, Bulk Milk Coolers 2 no.s with a capacity of 500 lit. & 1,000 lit.
15 Consumers preferences
on milk products
Cow milk generally taken for consumption to children and aged and also for
devotional purposes.
16 Regular activity
Vigorous activity, at least 3 times washing, regular spot cleaning of animal
place (removal of solid waste & liquid waste), continuous feeding through out
the day.
Conduct Regular bull parade. One person is taking care this.
Regular data maintain in computer.
Different works taken care by different workers.
17 Institutional Support
No Insurance coverage.
No support from Legal, Municipal, revenue, banks, institution etc. (Also not
required).
Their experience with animal insurance is not good.
18 Problems &
Suggestions
Not disclosed any problem. He told that workers are key for this activity. They
train workers well. They understand workers problems and cooperate as and
when it is required.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
SNEHA DAIRY (Initiated in 2001)
Location: Uppal, located around 3 km from the main road
Area: 5-6 acres.
Proprietor: Nalla Malla Reddy
Herd Size: 250 buffaloes (150 adult females and 110 calves) and 4 bulls. All Murrah buffaloes
purchased from Haryana.
Total Milk Yield: 400 litres daily (yield of 5-6 litres per buffalo in milk)
Milk Marketing: Around 230 litres as raw milk supplied to hotels and local dairy shops
Remaining amount, around 170 litres is pasteurised and packaged and sold under the brand name
of SNEHA10
. Fresh cream is also sold in the market.
Transportation: Through own auto trolleys and vans
Procurement of green fodder: Land taken on lease at Uppal. Also growing 9 other fodders on an
experimental basis including berseem
Other inputs: Dry fooder, groundnut cake purchased from open market
Housing facility: 3 storeyed, with one storey for 120 animals. Separate sections for pregnant
buffaloes, bulls, and children. Also there is a swimming pond for the buffaloes to be used during
summer season. Electric fans are installed in the buffalo sheds.
Number of workers- 27 (4 supervisors, 8 for milking and 15 for feeding). The workers for milking
are migrants from Bihar, while the remaining are local workers.
No employee benefits to either of the workers such as Provident Fund or Medical Facilities.
Small capacity pasteurizer cum chiller and storage tank and a milking machine also.
Water facility: Ground water (3 borewells)
All animals insured. Source of investment for cattle not disclosed (i.e. either from bank or own
investment)
Value addition is being done on animal dung by preparation of vermin-compost from it (for details
see paragraph below)
This is a big dairy unit located on the outskirts of Hyderabad. Spread across an area of approximately
5-6 acres, the dairy is an example of the best animal care practices in the Hyderabad UPA. Unlike
other smaller dairies located in the city or outskirts or unlike the big dairy (SUPER DAIRY) located in
the middle of the city, the animal care practices and the space available within the premises for animal
recreation and movement is good and in sharp contrast with the earlier mentioned types of dairies. The
land belongs to an entrepreneur Mr. Nalla Malla Reddy. He has several businesses apart from the dairy
activity such as an engineering college and real estate business. The dairy farm is located on his own
land. There are separate feed preparation sections with all necessary equipments such as fodder chop
cutter, mixer, trolleys etc. The transportation and distribution of the packaged milk is through their
own infrastructure. Veterinary doctor pays monthly visit (private doctor) for regular animal check up.
The daily feed mix consists of green fodder, dry fodder (2:1 ratio) i.e., around 7-8 kg per day and also
groundnut cake soaked in water (around half kg). For fodder, as already mentioned above, the owners
have leased around 30 acres of land in the Uppal area.
Another unique activity taken up by the proprietor is the utilization of dung in the vermi compost unit
set up at a location of less than 1 km from the dairy unit. Vermi compost is prepared in 7-8 sheds in
the unit and the demand for the organic manure is high. Customers from as far as Vijaywada have
come and purchased in bulk. The owners‘ interest and the availability and willingness for investment
into the entire set up is noticeable. The future plan is to expand to the full capacity of 320-340
buffaloes. Marketing is not perceived to be a problem by them. The current green fodder being fed to
the animals i.e., paragrass is not considered to be a nutritious fodder for the cattle and this is the reason
behind the trial for other fodder varieties on a pilot basis.
10
The pasteurised milk is sold at a price of Rs 7.50 per half litre (MRP), including the commission for the
retailers. The dairy directly supplies to the retailers and has no distributors.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
SMALL DAIRY AT MUSHEERABAD (Initiated in 1990)
Location: Behind the fodder market (> 1 km from the fodder market)
Area: 0.2 acres.
Herd Size: 7 buffaloes (6 adult females and 1 calf). All Murrah buffaloes purchased from buffalo
market
Total Milk Yield: 20-25 litres daily (yield of 5-6 litres per buffalo in milk)
Milk Marketing: All the milk is sold in the nearby apartments
No milk products are prepared
Procurement of green fodder: Procured from the brokers in the local fodder market
Other inputs: Cattle feed mix purchased from the market
Housing facility: Shed with mud flooring and no separate feed alleys for the animals. There is a
cement water tank for the cattle
Number of workers- 1. Migrant worker from Bihar incharge for milking, cleaning and milk sales.
The workers has an adjacent room provided.
Water facility: Ground water- borewell.
No insurance of animals.
No loans taken from public institutions such as bank for purchase of animals
Animal dung sold to farms at the rate o Rs 800 to Rs 1000 per truck
There are no regular medical check ups of the cattle. The income from milk is able to recover the
salaries and other running expenses assuring a monthly income of around Rs 3000 to Rs 4000 to the
dairy unit owner. There are no plans of expansion, however. As the owner has other businesses, he is
not able to provide sufficient time for the dairy unit. Cleanliness and hygiene are not maintained even
to a minimum level.
SMALL DAIRY AT KISHANBAGH (I). (Initiated in 1996)
Location: Kishanbagh. Shed in the own premises of the dairy owner
Proprietor: Hashmat Bhai. (No of dependent households-2)
Area: 0.1 acre
Herd Size: 15 buffaloes (13 adult females and 2 calves). All Murrah buffaloes purchased from
Punjab
Total Milk Yield: 30 litres daily (yield of 4-5 litres per buffalo in milk)
Milk Marketing: All the milk is sold from the household only
No milk products are prepared
Procurement of green fodder: 2 acres of land is leased in the Attapur area. (Annual lease cost Rs
25000 per acre)
Own bullock cart for transportation of green fodder
Other inputs: Cattle feed mix and groundnut cake purchased from the market on cash and part
credit basis
Housing facility: Shed with paved flooring
Number of workers- 2 self (owner and his brother). One additional worker for cleaning and animal
care. One workers for cutting and transportation of green fodder
Water facility: Ground water- borewell.
No other business of the household
Animal dung not sold, thrown away
No insurance cover taken for animals. Milk income is the only source of income for the 2 dependent
households comprising of 8 members.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
SMALL DAIRY AT KISHANBAGH (II). (20 years old)
Location: Kishanbagh. Rented premises
Proprietor: Babulal. (No of dependent households-1)
Area: 500 sq m
Herd Size: 13 buffaloes (10 adult females and 3 calves), and one bull. All Gujjar buffaloes
purchased from Chintalkunta in Sanga Reddy
Total Milk Yield: 40-50 litres daily (yield of 4-5 litres per buffalo in milk)
Milk Marketing: Milk is taken on scooter and motorcycle by the owner‘s son to hotels and to
customers (some of whom are located as far as Charminar from the area). Some milk is also sold
from the doorstep
Curd is also prepared (around 3kgs) and sold to the nearby local dairy
Procurement of green fodder: 2 acres of land is leased in the Attapur area. (Annual lease cost Rs
2000 per acre per month)
Own bullock cart for transportation of green fodder
Other inputs: Cattle feed mix and groundnut cake purchased from the market on cash and part
credit basis
Housing facility: Fully Shed with paved flooring
Number of workers- 2 self (owner and his son). One additional worker for cleaning and animal
care. One workers for cutting and transportation of green fodder
Water facility: Ground water- borewell.
No other business of the household.
Animal dung sold to farms at the rate of Rs 1000 per truck
No insurance cover taken for animals. No loans from bank availed for the purpose. Milk income is the
only source of income for the household. After the buffalo becomes dry, it is sold in the animal market
and animals in milk purchased. Earlier, the herd size was around 20, lack of labour availability and
space are cited as the main reasons for now restricting the herd size. However, the next generation also
wants to continue the occupation as it is providing good returns and also lack of other employment
opportunities.
SMALL DAIRY AT ALWAL
Location: Alwal (road side). Rented premises
Area: 400 sq m
Herd Size: 13 buffaloes (10 adult females and 3 calves), and one bull. All Gujjar buffaloes
purchased from Chintalkunta in Sanga Reddy
Total Milk Yield: 25 litres daily (yield of 3-4 litres per buffalo in milk)
Milk Marketing: Location is on the highway and milk is sold to the nearby small restaurants and
hotels.
Procurement of green fodder: Some amount is grown on the land near the small pond adjoining
the dairy unit. However, around 70 percent of the fodder is dry fodder purchased from the market.
Food Waste from the nearby hotels is also fed to the animals
Cattle feed mix is purchased from the market. No other cakes such as groundnut cake are fed to
the animals.
Housing facility: Fully Shed with paved flooring
Number of workers- 2 self (owner and his brother). One additional worker for cleaning and animal
care. One workers for cutting and transportation of green fodder
Water facility: Surrounding pond
No other business of the household.
Animal dung not sold
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
ANNEX 6: SYNDICATE FARMERS‘ SERVICE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED
The Syndicate Farmers‘ Service Cooperative Society Limited, located at Alwal was established in the
year 1978. As the name suggests, the Cooperative Society was promoted by the Syndicate Bank. Mr.
GS Murthy, a Syndicate Bank official took the initiative to merge 21 Primary Agricultural
Cooperative Societies (PACS)11
in order to form the current Syndicate Farmers‘ Cooperative Society.
The new cooperative society provided a medium through which the Syndicate Bank could channel
finance to the farmers. The objective of merging the PACS societies and bringing them under one
cooperative fold was to centralize operations and governance of such lending institutions. Secondly,
the Bank felt that within usual banking operations, it was not able to provide required attention to rural
lending particularly agricultural lending. Hence a separate set up could serve the purpose more
effectively. The bank charges 2.5 percent commission on all lending activity. Thus the Syndicate Bank
is the financing institution for the society.
Activities
As mentioned above, the primary activity of the society is to provide agricultural loans to the farmers
in the area. The society also provides loans for other productive purposes such as livestock and milch
animal purchase. Savings accounts and fixed deposit facilities are also provided to the members. Gold
loan facility is also available to both the members and the non-members. In the past, the Alwal belt
had a large area under grape gardens. However, during the past 7-8 years, the area under grape gardens
has decreased by more than 80 percent. Due to recovery problems in case of milch animal loans, the
society has now stopped providing loans for milch animals. Gold loans have now become the major
service being provided by the society. Thus, the cooperative society functions like a mini-bank. The
book keeping and accounting practices are similar to any other bank. The accounting system is
partially computerized. As per the Bank officials, the cost of full automation would be not feasible for
the Society.
The cooperative society owns around 9.2 acres of land at Hakimpet. A godown has been constructed at
the land for the storage and sale of agricultural inputs such as seeds, fertilizers and pesticides. The
cooperative society has direct tie-ups with the input supply companies. According the cooperative
employees, input purchase is one of the actively demanded and utilized services of the cooperative
society. Supply of reliable and assured quality of inputs by the cooperative is the major reason. The
members are provided the inputs on credit (adjusted against the loans given to the farmers). A large
number of non-members also purchase the inputs on cash basis.
11
The PACS were village level cooperative societies formed for providing agricultural loans to the farmers. The
PACS were in turn financed by the lead banks in the districts. However, the operational guidelines and rules of
each PACS being different made any combined activity difficult. Moreover, majority of the PACS societies
started making loss after some years. These 21 villages are Alwal, Kowkur, Mahadevpur, Macchabollaram,
Turkapally Bollaram, Jawahar Nagar, Chennapur, Yapral, Khapra, Thumkunta, Yamjal, Pothaipalli, Mandaipalli,
Singaipalli, Anthaipalli, Ammuguda, Farjanguda, Bowenpally, Firozguda, Hasmatpeta and Neredmet.
The OBJECTIVES as stated by the Cooperative in its Annual Reports is as follows:
To provide loans to farmers for agricultural purposes
To supply agricultural inputs at reasonable prices
To mobilize deposits from members by promoting thrift
To generate awareness regarding new farming techniques and usage of inputs
The ACTIVITIES as stated by the Cooperative in its Annual Reports is as follows:
Providing short term, medium term and long term loan for small and marginal farmers
Providing seeds, fertilizers and pesticides at a reasonable cost
Collection of member deposits through different deposit schemes
Organizing of extension programmes with the help of agricultural scientists to make the
farmers aware of new technological interventions
Provision of gold loans and locker facilities
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
Turnover
As per the annual report 2004-05, the major categories of farmers availing of crop loan facility are
grape farmers. This is followed by loans for petty trades. Some key indicators of the performance and
status of the cooperative society are as follows12
:
Short term crop loans: Rs 5.1 million
Medium and Long Term loans: Rs 15.77 million
Interest Income on Loans: Rs 0.98 million
Sale of Inputs: Rs 4.46 million (with a profit of Rs 0.18 million)
Total Profit: Rs 1.12 million
Administrative Expenses: Rs 0.14 million
Governance
The cooperative society has an 11 member governing body. The byelaws provide for reservation for
Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe and women. The Board has a five-year term. At present, there are 2
SC, 1 ST and 2 women members in the governing board. There is a monthly meeting of the Board, in
which the monthly status report of the Bank operations is presented. Other strategic decisions such as
focus areas of lending, investment in other businesses such as input procurement and sale are also
taken by the Board. The operating body is accountable to the Board members.
Operations
The Society staff is at present comprised of 9 members. Except for the Managing Director, all the
remaining staff are the employees of the society. The MD is a deputed officer from the Syndicate
Bank. All the other employees are quite senior in the Society, each having completed more than 15
years of service in the cooperative society. The MD draws his salary from the cooperative society
when the society is running in profit. In case of loss making by the Society, he/she draws his salary
from his/her parent organization. The MD is accountable to both the governing body of the
Cooperative society and also Syndicate Bank.
Membership
The cooperative society has 5490 members13
spread across 21 villages. A total of 24 members joined
in the year 2004-05. The membership increased by around 300 since the year 1999-2000. As per the
annual report, there are 425 members who have defaulted on society loans.
Assets
The Cooperative Society office is located in its own building at Alwal and it is more than 20 years old.
The land was given as grant by one of the members and the construction cost was also financed by
means of grant. As already mentioned the Society also owns around 9.2 acres of land in Hakimpet
area. Besides its own godown, it also owns another building on the same plot of land, which it has
leased to ITC Ltd, a corporate company to set up its vegetable processing plant in the premises.
12
Based on figures mentioned in the Annual Report: 2004-05 13
Till 31-03-2005
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
ANNEX 7: KUSHAIGUDA VEGETABLE MARKET
An example of an informal, yet highly efficient form of organization related to UPA value chain is the
association of wholesalers and retailers operating in the Kushaiguda vegetable market in the Kapra
municipality. The Kushaiguda vegetable market is around 13 years old. The vegetable market is
located 200m from Kushiaguda bus stand. The plot of land on which the market is located belongs to
Andhra Pradesh Infrastructure Development Corporation (APIDC).
Market Set Up
Origin, Catchment area, Members’ Profile, Management
In1993, as a result of rapid urbanization in Kapra District, 8-10 vegetable vendors started selling
vegetables in the current area. Gradually, the number of vegetable vendors increased both with the
increase in residing population in the area and also as the market structures to facilitate the
transactions started evolving. As of now, there are around 10 wholesale traders and 200 retail traders
operating in the market. The daily transaction in the market is around 700 to 1,000 t d-1
. The supply
chain in the Kushaiguda market is as shown below;
The farmers in villages within 20 km radius of the market14
, belonging to Kapra and Keesara
municipalities bring their produce to the market daily in auto rickshaws, trolley autos and small trucks.
There are 10 wholesale traders in the market, who purchase from these farmers. Payment is made in
cash to the producers. The wholesalers in turn sell to the 200 retailers. The major mode of transaction
is credit. In 2000, as the number of retailers increased, the current 200 retailers and the wholesalers
decided to form an informal association, the major objective of which was to prevent other vendors
from entering the market and secondly to regularize and streamline the operations in the current
market such as allotment of space for each vendor and maintenance of the market space. Each of the
vendors has been allotted a space in the market. There is no entry provision for a new wholesale trader
or vendor. However, a current member of the market can sell or rent his ‗shop‘ and thereby the right to
purchase or sell in the market to another vendor. The members of the association have elected by
mutual consensus, a secretary to take care of the maintenance of the market place. Each vendor gives
Rs 5 per day as the maintenance fee. However, no fee or rent is given to APDIC (on whose land the
market has been operating for the past 13 years).
There are around 10-15 residential colonies in the Kushaiguda area. There is a weekly market held by
a group of vegetable traders in each of the colonies. These retail traders purchase from the wholesale
agents in Kushaiguda market and then sell in the daily markets in these colonies. The margin of the
retail traders in the Kushaiguda market is 10-15%. Those who sell in the daily markets in the
residential colonies have a margin of 15-20%.
14
Main villages are Yaadgiripally, Turkapally, Rampally, Mespally, Ballaguda,Timaypally and Cheerala
Farm produce
from villages
within 20 km
radius
Transport through auto rickshaws,
trolley autos, mini-trucks
10
wholesalers
200 retailers in
Kushiguda market
Retailers in
10-20
adjacent
Colonies
To other
markets
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
The members of the market association have agreed to shift alternative designated market place
developed by the State Government. For the new market place, the members of the current informal
association would pay the rent to the government. None of the retailers are primary producers. The
200 members who now sell in the market are local people, who have migrated from the surrounding
villages around 5-10 years back.
Apart from sale in the retail markets in and around Kushaiguda, the wholesalers also sell the produce
to other vegetable markets in the city. The general practice is to dispatch the vegetable supply coming
to the Kushaiguda market and in turn, the vegetables that are not supplied from the catchment area of
the market are purchased from the other markets and brought to the market. This function is also
performed by the wholesale traders. Besides vegetables, there are fruit vendors (who are not part of the
association) who sell produce on the roadside. Some of the retailers in the market also sell fish and
other grocery items. However, the wholesalers in the market deal only in vegetables. The fruit, fish,
flower and meat vendors buy from the wholesale markets located in different parts of the city.
Summary
Kushaiguda market is an example of an informal association operating without any written guidelines
on the basis of mutually agreed norms. It is an example of an association formed to further and protect
mutual benefits by more than one group of market players (in this case the wholesalers and the
retailers). The mutually identified needs which form the basis for such an organization are absence of
legitimate or secure right to land for market, to legitimize the same within the group and to prevent
increase in competition. This form of association also serves the purpose of a common forum to
negotiate with the government for compensation in the form of a new market place, with required
infrastructure developed by the government. The primary need is to get recognition as an entity. The
other services provided are namely, maintenance of the market place and resolution of disputes that
may arise among the members.
ANNEX 8: CORPORATE SECTOR IN FRUIT &VEGETABLE BUSINESS: CASE OF ITC'S
CHOUPAL FRESH
A recent trend in India has been the entry of big Corporatations into the agricultural sector,
particularly agricultural marketing. Apart from contract farming, other business models have also been
developed by some leading corporatations including ITC. ITC is a large Indian Corporate Company
having a turnover of around Rs 5,000 Crores (1,098,901,098 US$). Its much talked and written about
e-choupal venture for sourcing agricultural commodities such as food grain (wheat), spices, soyabean,
chillies and now fruits and vegetables through its own supply chain network is aimed at removing
middlemen from the value chain and in turn providing higher remunerative prices to farmers. By
achieving this type of integration within the value chain, it is able to reduce the cost of raw materials
for its various food processing facilities and also provide the processed or unprocessed commodities at
competitive rates to the customers.
Recently, the company has started its B2B network for vegetables known as Choupal Fresh. The
venture is primarily meant to procure from other regions (the traditional supply belts of fruits and
vegetables) and fulfill the growing demand of the Hyderabad City. A cold storage unit is also being set
up in Deveryamjal in Alwal. Moreover, Hyderabad being a major trading centre, the infrastructure in
terms of roads, power, communication, technology for storage facilities etc is also an enabling factor.
As of now, the major customers include hotels and also to some extent, wholesale vegetable traders
More B2C centers i.e., shops have been planned in different parts of the city in the coming months.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
ANNEX 9: THE ANDHRA PRADESH MUTUALLY AIDED COOPERATIVE SOCIETY ACT
(1995)
Andhra Pradesh
Mutually Aided Cooperative Societies Act 1995
[Act No 30 of 1995]
An Act to provide for the voluntary formation of cooperative societies as accountable, competitive,
self reliant business enterprises, based on thrift, self-help and mutual aid and owned, managed and
controlled by members for their economic and social betterment and for the matters connected
therewith or incidental thereto
Be it enacted by the Legislative Assembly of the State of Andhra Pradesh in the forty-sixth year of the
Republic of India, as follows:
1. Short title, extent and commencement (1) This Act may be called the Andhra Pradesh Mutually Aided Cooperative Societies Act, 1995.
(2) It extends to the whole of the State of Andhra Pradesh.
(3) It shall come into force on such date as the Government may, by notification, in the Andhra
Pradesh Gazette, appoint.
[Comment: This Act came into force, on 1st
June 1995, even as the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative
Societies Act, 1964 was and continues to be in force. Obviously, a distinction was being sought to be
made between the cooperatives that were under the purview of the 1964 Act, and those that were to
come under the purview of this Act.
This Preamble helps distinguish between the two types of cooperatives. Not all, but many of the
cooperatives which were registered under the 1964 Act came into existence, not of their own volition,
but as a result of government policy and intervention. They, therefore, had government aid and not
mutual aid as their foundation. They were instruments of government policy, not instruments of their
members, for their own good. They were channels for distribution of scarce resources, and, therefore,
were at times monopolies - not competitive, nor business minded. The Government, and other
financial players were part owners, and, therefore, ownership, management, and controls did not rest
fully with members.
Under the 1964 Act, too, there were cooperatives which were true agents of their members, and that
is the reason why this Act also provides for such cooperatives to choose voluntarily to come under the
purview of this Act. Many court judgements have suggested that cooperatives are not creatures of the
will of their members, and this Preamble makes clear that associations registered as cooperatives
under this Act are indeed creatures of their members, working for their betterment.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
2. Definitions In this Act unless the context otherwise requires:-
(a) ―board‖ means the board of directors of a cooperative society;
(b) ―byelaws‖ means the byelaws of a cooperative society as originally framed or as altered from time
to time in pursuance of this Act;
(c) ―cooperative principles‖ means the cooperative principles specified in section 3;
(d) ―cooperative society‖ means a mutually aided cooperative society registered under section 4 whose
byelaws prohibit it from raising share capital from the Government, a cooperative society registered
under section 7 of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964, if it amends its byelaws where
necessary to reconstitute its capital base and in respect of other relevant aspects to be in accordance
with this Act, and returns to the Government its share capital, if any, and either enters into a
memorandum of understanding with the Government for any outstanding loans due to, or guarantees
given by the Government or returns to the Government of such assistance and further gets itself
registered under section 4 as a cooperative society under this Act;
(e) ―cooperative society with limited liability‖ means a cooperative society in which the liability of its
members for the debts of the cooperative society in the event of its being wound up, is limited by its
byelaws to such amount as they may undertake to contribute to the assets of the cooperative;
(f) ―cooperative society with unlimited liability‖ means a cooperative society the members of which
are, in the event of its being wound up, jointly and severally liable for and in respect of all its
obligations and to contribute to any deficit in the assets of the cooperative society;
(g) ―cooperative tribunal‖ means the tribunal or tribunals constituted under section 32;
(h) ―deficit‖ means the net excess of expenditure over income,
(i) ―delegate‖ means a member nominated by a cooperative society to represent its interests in a
federation;
(j) ―director‖ means a director of the board of directors;
(k) ―federation‖ means a mutually aided cooperative society registered under section 4 whose
members are mutually aided cooperative societies;
(l) ―financial year‖ in relation to a cooperative society means the twelve month accounting period as
provided for in the byelaws;
(m) ―general body‖ in relation to a cooperative society means all the members of the cooperative
society and includes a representative general body of the cooperative society referred to in section 20;
(n) ―general meeting‖ means a meeting of the general body of a cooperative society;
(o) ―Government‖ means the State Government of Andhra Pradesh;
(p) ―member‖ means a member of a cooperative society;
(q) ―office-bearer‖ means an individual elected by the general body or the board of the cooperative
society to any office of such cooperative society in accordance with its byelaws;
(r) ―Registrar‖ means the Registrar of Mutually Aided Cooperative Societies appointed under section
4 of this Act, and includes any other person on whom all or any of the powers of the Registrar under
this Act are conferred;
(s) ―surplus‖ means the net excess of income over the expenditure;
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
3. Cooperative principles and byelaws Individuals or cooperatives intending to form into a cooperative society under this Act shall frame
byelaws conforming to the following principles of cooperation, namely,
(a) membership of a cooperative society shall be voluntary and available without restriction of any
social, political, racial or religious discrimination, to all persons who can make use of its services and
are willing to accept the responsibilities of membership;
(b) cooperative societies are democratic organisations; their affairs shall be administered by persons
elected or appointed in a manner agreed by the members and accountable to them. Members of
primary cooperative societies shall enjoy equal rights of voting (one member, one vote) and
participation in decisions affecting their cooperative societies. In other than primary cooperative
societies, the administration shall be conducted on a democratic basis in a suitable form;
(c) share capital shall only receive a strictly limited rate of interest, if any;
(d) the economic results, arising out of the operations of a cooperative society belong to the members
of that cooperative society and shall be distributed in such a manner as would avoid one member
gaining at the expense of others, which shall be achieved:
(i) by provision for development of the business of the cooperative society;
(ii) by provision of common services; or
(iii) by distribution among the members in proportion to their transactions with the cooperative
society;
(e) all cooperative societies shall make provision for the education of their members, officer-bearers
and employees and of the general public, in the principles and techniques of cooperation, both
economic and democratic;
(f) all cooperative societies, in order to best serve the interest of their members and their communities,
shall actively cooperate in every practical way with other cooperatives at local, national and
international levels having as their aim the achievement of unity of action by cooperators throughout
the world.
[Comment: The APMACS Act came into force before the General Assembly of the International
Cooperative Alliance met in September 1995 to revise the cooperative principles. As such the
internationally accepted cooperative principles as they existed at the time of enactment of this Act
have been incorporated in the Act. The Statement of Cooperative Identity passed by the ICA in
September 1995, includes all the concepts mentioned above, and has further expanded on them, and
added some new concepts.]
4. Registration (1) Where not less than ten individuals each being a member of a different family intend to form a
cooperative society, or two or more cooperative societies registered under this section wish to form
into a federation, or a society registered under section 7 of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies
Act, 1964 intends to convert itself into a cooperative society under this Act, they shall frame byelaws
for this purpose in accordance with section 3 in the first instance.
[Comment: The 1995 Act could have provided for any cooperative under the 1964 Act to be deemed
to be registered under the new Act, if it had no government share capital or loan or guarantee.
Automatically, all savings and credit cooperatives, and several other cooperatives would have come
under the purview of the new Act. However, since the Preamble makes it clear that registration under
the new Act has to be the result of the will of the members of a cooperative, and that registration
under the new Act comes with accountability and competitive spirit, the new Act leaves it to each
cooperative under the old Act to choose to remain under the old Act, or to shift to the new one.]
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
(2) Thereafter an application for registration shall be submitted to the Registrar by hand or by
registered post.
(3) Every such application shall be accompanied by
(a) the original and one copy of the byelaws of the proposed cooperative society as adopted by the
individuals or delegates of cooperative societies who wish to form into a cooperative society under
this Act or by the general body of a society registered under the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies
Act, 1964 which wishes to convert itself into a cooperative society under this Act;
(b) a list of names of individuals or cooperatives who wish to form into a cooperative society under
this Act or of the members of the committee of the society registered under the Andhra Pradesh
Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 which intends to convert itself into a cooperative society under this
Act with their addresses, occupations and their financial commitments to the proposed cooperative
society;
(c) a true copy of the minutes of the meeting at which the byelaws were adopted, duly signed by
atleast a majority of individuals or delegates present at the meeting where the byelaws were adopted,
or by a majority of the members of the committee of the cooperative concerned where a society
registered under the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964, intends to convert itself into a
cooperative society under this Act;
(d) registration fee amounting to one percent of the total authorised share capital by whatever name
called subject to a minimum of one hundred rupees and a maximum of ten thousand rupees; and
(e) in the case of a society registered under section 7 of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act,
1964 and wishing to convert itself into a cooperative society under this Act, evidence to show that the
society is not in possession of any share capital from Government, and evidence also to show that the
society is not in receipt of any government loans or guarantees at the time of applying for registration
as a cooperative society under this Act, or that it has entered into a memorandum of understanding
with the Government for any such outstanding loans or guarantees.
[Comment: The procedure for a new registration and for conversion from the old Act to the new one
is provided for in section 4. Some doubts have arisen on whether the new Act can lay the procedure
for conversion from the old Act, or whether it is necessary for the old Act to have some provisions in
this regard. It must be noted that both the Acts were passed by the Andhra Pradesh Legislature. The
1995 Act was the later Act.
The Legislature was fully conscious of the continuance of the old Act, even as it was ushering in the
new Act. It chose to determine the procedure for conversion only in the new Act, and as such, newly
forming cooperatives as well as cooperatives which are under the 1964 Act need to follow the
provisions of section 4 of the new Act to come under the purview of the 1995 Act.
In particular it must be noted that the use of the term “conversion” in the 1964 Act is quite different
to its use in the 1995 Act. In the 1964 Act it is used in the context of a change in the objectives of a
cooperative, and, therefore, a possible change in membership interests in the cooperative. In the 1995
Act, the term is used merely for change in registration from the old Act to the new one, objectives,
membership, etc, all remaining the same, and the general body choosing greater freedom
accompanied by greater responsibility for their cooperative through “converting” to the 1995 Act. As
such, the provisions relating to conversion under the 1964 Act are not relevant for conversion to the
new Act.]
(4) The Registrar shall, if he is satisfied that
(a) the application is in conformity with the requirements of this Act;
(b) the proposed byelaws are not contrary to the provisions of this Act; and
(c) the name of the proposed cooperative society is not the same as that of a cooperative society
already registered under this section, or the same as that used by a class of societies already registered
under section 7 of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964,
register the cooperative society and also its byelaws and communicate by registered post a certificate
of registration and the original of the registered byelaws signed and sealed by him, within a period of
sixty days from the date of submission of application, to the chief promoter mentioned in the
application.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
[Comment: Under most state cooperative laws, since cooperatives are seen as instruments of
government policy, and as channels for distribution of scarce government resources, the registering
authority has the power to refuse to register a cooperative on the grounds that it might not be
financially viable, or that its existence was likely to affect the viability of another cooperative already
in existence. Under the 1995 Act, since cooperatives are seen as agents of their members, the
registering authority has not been given any discretion in refusing registration. Time limits have been
fixed for registration or refusal to register to be communicated to the applicants.
The Registrar has only to ensure that the provisions of the Act have been adhered to by the applicants
for registration, and that the name they have proposed for their cooperative is not already in use by
another. The right to freedom of association, guaranteed by the Constitution of India, is respected
and provided with the necessary legal framework, where those associating desire such a legal
framework for their association.
Most other forms of organisations, such as, companies, or societies, are not required to declare their
“area of operation”. This concept of area of operation was introduced in mid-60s in cooperative
laws in the country, to ensure that there was no “overlapping or conflict of jurisdiction” between
cooperatives. The very use of the term “jurisdiction” in relation to a cooperative spoke volumes of
the perception of cooperatives as arms of the government. The 1995 Act avoids the use of the terms
“area of operation”, and “jurisdiction” in relation to the functioning of cooperatives. In order to
identify which registering authority, or which tribunal has jurisdiction over which area, the State
Government has clarified that the registering authority and tribunal in the case of any cooperative
will be those who have jurisdiction for the location at which the headquarters of a cooperative is
situated.]
(5) If the conditions laid down in sub-section (4) are not fulfilled, the Registrar shall communicate by
registered post the order of refusal together with the reasons therefor, within sixty days from the date
of submission of application, to the chief promoter.
(6) There shall be appointed a Registrar of Mutually Aided Cooperative Societies for the State and as
many other officers as the Government think fit for the purposes of this Act.
[Comment: The law makers, in their wisdom, have chosen to provide for a separate Registrar of
Mutually Aided Cooperative Societies. It would be best, therefore, if the intent behind this provision is
to be respected, that a person distinct from the Registrar appointed under the 1964 Act were
appointed as Registrar under the 1995 Act.]
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
5. Registration certificate
Where a cooperative society is registered, the certificate of registration signed and sealed by the
Registrar shall be conclusive evidence that the cooperative society mentioned therein, is a mutually
aided cooperative society duly registered under this Act;
Provided that where a society was earlier registered under the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies
Act, 1964, such registration shall stand cancelled once a certificate of registration under this section is
issued.
[Comment: Where a cooperative registered under the 1964 Act obtains its registration certificate
under the 1995 Act, its old registration stands cancelled. A somewhat similar provision is available
under the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, which is applicable to cooperatives whose
membership is drawn from more than one state. If a cooperative registered under a state law chooses
to extend its membership beyond the boundaries of the state, then it needs to amend its byelaws, and
send the proposal for registration of amendment, not to the State Registrar, but to the Central
Registrar. When such an amendment is registered by the Central Registrar, he/she also issues a
certificate to the effect that the cooperative is now registered as a multi-state cooperative, and that
the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act is now applicable to it, which means that the state law is no
longer applicable to it, and that it ceases to be a cooperative under the state law.]
6. Society to be a body corporate (1) A cooperative society registered under this Act shall be a body corporate by the name under which
it is registered having perpetual succession and a common seal. The cooperative society shall be
entitled to acquire, hold and dispose of property, to enter into contracts, to sue and be sued and to do
all other things necessary to achieve its objectives.
(2) All transactions entered into in good faith prior to registration, in furtherance of the objectives of
the cooperative society, shall be deemed to be transactions of the cooperative society after its
registration.
7. Registration with limited or unlimited liability A cooperative society may be registered with limited or unlimited liability. Where the liability is
limited, it shall have as a suffix to its name the expression ―limited‖ or its equivalent in any Indian
language.
[Comment: Both the 1964 and the 1995 Acts provide for cooperatives to be registered with limited or
unlimited liability. The 1964 Act, however, requires federations to be registered only with limited
liability. In practice, under the 1995 Act, since cooperatives have to recover/recoup deficit (loss), if
any, on an annual basis, from reserves or members‟ accounts, the liability of the members in the event
of dissolution, is limited in fact to meeting the shortfall in assets in the last year of functioning.]
8. Display of name (1) Every cooperative society shall display its full name, registration number and the address of its
registered office in legible characters in a conspicuous position
(a) at every office or place at which it carries on business;
(b) in all notices and other official publications;
(c) on all its contracts, business letters, orders for goods, invoices, statements of account, receipts and
letters of credit; and
(d) on all bills of exchange, promissory notes, endorsements, cheques and orders for money it signs or
that are signed on its behalf.
(2) Where a cooperative society has a corporate seal, it shall display its full name in legible characters
on its corporate seal.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
9. Byelaws (1) Except on such specific matters for which this Act has provided, the functioning of every
cooperative society shall be regulated by its byelaws. Subject to the provisions of this Act and the
byelaws every cooperative society shall have regard to the cooperative principles in its functioning.
(2) Subject to section 3, the byelaws of a cooperative society shall be specific on the following
matters, namely,
(i) the name and address of the cooperative society;
(ii) the object of the cooperative society explicitly stated as a common central need of the members
which the cooperative society aims at fulfilling;
(iii) eligibility, ineligibility and procedure for obtaining and retaining membership;
(iv) procedure for withdrawal, cessation and termination of membership;
(v) the services that it intends to give its members;
(vi) fixation of minimum performance expected annually of each member vis-a-vis use of services,
financial commitment and participation in meetings, in order to be eligible to exercise the rights of
membership including the right to vote;
(vii) the consequences of performing below the minimum level fixed;
(viii) the consequences of default in payment of any sum due by a member;
(ix) rights of members;
(x) the nature and extent of the liability of the members for the debts contracted by the cooperative
society;
(xi) the manner of making or amending byelaws;
(xii) the powers and functions of the general body, and the powers and functions and the manner of
constitution of representative general body, if any, and subjects which must be dealt with by the
general body, and by the representative general body, if any;
(xiii) the manner and frequency of convening general meetings and quorum required;
(xiv) the manner of conducting elections and of filling casual vacancies;
(xv) the size and composition of the board of directors;
(xvi) the term of office of the directors;
(xvii) the manner of removal of directors;
(xviii) the manner and frequency of convening board meetings and quorum;
(xix) the powers and duties of the board;
(xx) the powers and duties of the chairperson;
(xxi) the terms on which the cooperative society may deal with non-members;
(xxii) eligibility, ineligibility for becoming and continuing as director;
(xxiii) penalties for acting against the interests of the cooperative society and for non-fulfilment of
duties by members, office-bearers, directors or staff;
(xxiv) the nature and extent of the liability of office-bearers, directors for debts contracted by the
cooperative society;
(xxv) the authorisation of an officer or officers to sign documents and to institute and defend suits and
other legal proceedings on behalf of the cooperative society;
(xxvi) the manner of choosing delegates to higher tier cooperative federations; (xxvii) the rights, if
any, which the cooperative society intends to confer on any cooperative society or other federation and
the circumstances under which these rights may be exercised by the society or federation;
(xxviii) the nature and amount of capital, if any, of the cooperative society;
(xxix) the maximum capital which a single member can hold;
(xxx) the maximum interest payable to members on paid up share capital;
(xxxi) the sources, types and extent of funds to be raised by the cooperative society;
(xxxii) the purposes for which the funds may be applied;
(xxxiii) the constitution of various funds and their purposes;
(xxxiv) the manner of appointment of auditors and their powers and functions;
(xxxv) the manner of appointment of internal auditors and their powers and functions;
(xxxvi) the manner of disposal of funds when the cooperative society is under liquidation; and
(xxxvii) the manner of dissolution of the cooperative society.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
[Comment: In keeping with the spirit of liberalisation, the 1995 Act does not give the Government the
power to make Rules. A cooperative under this Act is guided by the provisions in the Act (including
the cooperative principles], its byelaws, and any understanding or contract that it enters into with
various parties including the Government.
The above section, therefore, requires cooperatives to think through a long list of provisions for
inclusion in their byelaws. Keeping in mind other provisions in the Act, the byelaws may additionally
include the financial year which the cooperative wishes to adopt, and also provide for the internal
dispute settlement mechanism.
Model byelaws have not been provided for, as uniformity and standardisation are anathema to
owning of responsibility for one‟s enterprise. In fact, this Act does not provide for the classification of
cooperatives, and every group of cooperators is free to design its cooperative with such objectives,
such activities, and such financial and management structure as appear appropriate to it. Potential
cooperators are expected to think through issues and have byelaws of their choice, so that they can
take full responsibility for the success or failure of their cooperative.]
10. Amendment of byelaws (1) A cooperative society may amend any of the provisions of its byelaws by a resolution of its general
body, or of its representative general body, where this exists;
Provided, that no such resolution shall be passed unless at least twenty clear days of written notice of
the meeting has been given along with a copy of the proposed amendment to each member of the
general body or representative general body, as the case may be, and such notice and proposed
amendment is also displayed on the notice board of the cooperative society for a period of twenty days
immediately preceding the date of the meeting;
Provided further that the representative general body shall not alter any provision in the byelaws
relating to its own constitution and powers.
(2) In the case of amendment of its byelaws with regard to matters relating to items (i), (ii), (ix), (x),
(xi), (xii), (xiii), (xiv), (xv), (xvi), (xvii), (xix), (xxiv), (xxix), (xxxvi) and (xxxvii) of sub-section (2)
of section 9, an application for the registration of the amendment shall be forwarded by the
cooperative society by registered post to the Registrar within a period of thirty days from the date of
the resolution.
(3) Every application forwarded to the Registrar shall be signed by the chairperson and shall be
accompanied by a copy of the resolution adopting the amendment and the following particulars,
namely,
(a) the date of the meeting at which the amendment was approved;
(b) the total number of members on the rolls of the cooperative society who were eligible to vote on
the date of such meeting, the number present at the meeting and the number of eligible members who
voted for the resolution.
(4) If the proposed amendment is in consonance with the provisions of this Act, the Registrar shall
register the proposed amendment within a period of sixty days from the date of receipt of the
application.
(5) The Registrar shall forward by registered post to the cooperative society within a period of fifteen
days after registration a copy of the registered amendment together with a certificate signed and sealed
by him and such certificate shall be conclusive evidence that the amendment has been duly registered.
(6) If the proposed amendment is not in consonance with the provisions of this Act, the Registrar shall
refuse, within a period of sixty days from the date of receipt of the application, to register the proposed
amendment;
Provided that no order refusing to register the amendment shall be passed except after giving the
cooperative society an opportunity of making its representation.
(7) The Registrar shall forward by registered post to the cooperative society, within a period of fifteen
days after refusal, the order of refusal together with the reasons therefor.
(8) Where no order of refusal is received by the cooperative society under sub-section (7) within a
period of seventy five days from the date of submission of application, it shall be deemed that the
Registrar has registered the amendment on the last date of the period specified in that sub-section.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
(9) In the case of all amendments to the byelaws other than those specified in sub-section (2),
information about the amendment shall be forwarded by the cooperative society by registered post,
with the enclosures and particulars specified in sub-section (3), to the Registrar within a period of
thirty days from the date of the general meeting at which the resolution was passed, and the Registrar
shall immediately take on file such amendment;
Provided, that such action shall not in any way preclude the Registrar from proceeding against the
cooperative society or its management, where such amendment is found to be contrary to the
provisions of this Act.
(10) An amendment to the byelaws under sub-section (9) shall come into effect only after registration
or on the thirtieth day from the date the amendment has been sent to the Registrar for taking on record,
as the case may be.
[Comment: Most cooperative laws provide for the compulsory amendment of the byelaws of a
cooperative by the Registrar. The 1995 Act does not provide for such compulsory amendment.
Cooperative laws across the country also require the registration of every amendment to the byelaws,
even though laws relating to the registration of societies or to companies do not expect any
amendment to be registered. The 1995 Act has categorised the provisions in the byelaws into two
parts. Amendments to those provisions which it considers to be of strategic interest to members, it
requires registration of. Amendments to all other provisions of the byelaws are to be sent to the
Registrar only for taking on record. A lot of unnecessary wastage of time between the taking of a view
by a general body, and the coming into force of that view has now been avoided, as a result of these
provisions.]
11. Change of liability, transfer of assets and liabilities, division, amalgamation (1) A cooperative society may, by a resolution of its general body,
(a) decide to amend its byelaws to change the form or the extent of its liability;
(b) decide to transfer its assets and liabilities, in whole or in part, to any other cooperative society
which agrees to such transfer by a resolution of its general body;
(c) divide itself into two or more cooperative societies.
(2) Any two or more cooperative societies may, by a resolution of their respective general bodies,
decide to amalgamate themselves and form a new cooperative society.
(3) Every resolution of a cooperative society under this section shall be passed at its general meeting
by a majority of total members with right of vote or two thirds of members present and voting
whichever is less and such resolution shall contain all particulars of the liability, transfer, division,
amalgamation as the case may be.
(4) Before passing a resolution under this section, the cooperative society shall give notice thereof
together with a copy of the resolution to all its members and federations to which it is affiliated, and
creditors who may give their consent. Notwithstanding any byelaw or contract to the contrary, any
member, federation, or creditor not consenting to the resolution shall, during a period of one month
from the date of service of the notice have the option of withdrawing their shares, deposits, loans or
services as the case may be.
(5) Any member, federation, or creditor who or which does not exercise within the specified period the
right under sub-section (4) shall be deemed to have consented to the resolution.
(6) A resolution passed by a cooperative society under this section shall not take effect until
(a) (i) the members, federations, and creditors have consented or are deemed to have consented to the
resolution under sub-section (4) or, as the case may be, sub-section (5); or (ii) all claims of the
members, federations, and creditors who have exercised the option referred to under sub-section (5)
within the period specified therein have been met in full or otherwise satisfied; and
(b) (i) in the case of change of liability, amendment of the byelaws of the cooperative society
concerned is registered or is deemed to have been registered; or
(ii) in the case of division or amalgamation, certificate of registration of the cooperative society or
societies is issued.
(7) When a resolution passed by a cooperative society under sub-section (2) takes effect the resolution
shall be a sufficient conveyance to vest the assets and liabilities in the transferee without any further
assurance.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
(8) The registration of a cooperative society shall stand cancelled and the cooperative society shall be
deemed to have been dissolved and shall cease to exist as a corporate body
(a) when the whole of the assets and liabilities of such cooperative society are transferred to another
cooperative society; or
(b) when such cooperative society divides itself into two or more cooperative societies.
(9) Where two or more cooperative societies are amalgamated to form a new cooperative society, the
registration of the cooperative societies so amalgamated shall stand cancelled and they shall be
deemed to have been dissolved and shall cease to exist as corporate bodies.
[Comment: Under the 1964 Act, havoc has been played in cooperatives by reorganisation through
compulsory amalgamation/division/merger/liquidation/transfer of “area” by the Registrar, with or
without the consent of members. The new Act does not provide for any such role for the Registrar.
Most cooperative laws also require the prior approval of the Registrar for any proposal by a
cooperative for amalgamation/division/etc. The 1995 Act recognises that vibrant cooperatives may
choose to change their structure with changing opportunities. It, therefore, simplifies the procedure
for amalgamation, division, etc and leaves all these matters to the will of the members as expressed at
their general body meetings, providing for due procedure.]
12. Promotion of subsidiary organisation (1) Any cooperative society may, by a resolution passed at general meeting by a majority of members
present and voting, promote one or more subsidiary organisations for the furtherance of its stated
objectives, and such organisations may be registered under any law for the time being in force, as
agreed to by the general body.
(2) The annual reports and accounts of any such subsidiary organisation shall be placed before the
general meeting of the promoting cooperative society every year.
(3) Any subsidiary organisation created under sub-section (1) shall exist for only as long as the general
body of the cooperative society deems its existence necessary.
[Comment: Cooperatives sometimes set up educational institutions, research institutions, and
even associated businesses. These may need independent structures and management, and
may even require to have body corporate status, distinct from the parental body. For such
needs, this section has provided for the setting up of subsidiary organisations under various
laws. Such a subsidiary is expected to further the objectives of the cooperative, and, therefore,
the Act provides for it to be accountable to the general body of the cooperative, and to exist
only at its pleasure.]
13. Creation of new organisation with others Where the collaboration between a cooperative society and any other organisation or organisations
requires the creation of a new organisation, the new organisation may be registered as a company or a
public society, as appropriate for the fulfilment of the objective with which it was created, and such
collaboration shall be reviewed every year by the general body of the cooperative society.
[Comment: Under section 4(1), the setting up of cooperatives by cooperatives has already been
provided for. Under this section, the setting up of other forms of organisation by cooperatives has
been envisaged. For example, if a cooperative cannot by itself set up an educational institution or
research station, or a bank, using section 12, it might consider doing that in collaboration with other
cooperatives, under section 13. Such an organisation, set up by two or more cooperatives, if also a
cooperative, would be established under section 4. Otherwise, it would be registered under the
appropriate law.]
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
14. Mobilisation of funds (1) A cooperative society may mobilise funds in the shape of share capital, deposits, debentures, loans
and other contributions from its members to such extent and under such conditions as may be
permissible under the byelaws of the cooperative society;
Provided that, at the time of dissolution of a cooperative society, the amounts due to the members shall
be settled only after the settlement of dues to others.
(2) A cooperative society may also mobilise funds in the shape of deposits, debentures, loans and other
contributions from other individuals and institutions, to such extent and under such conditions as may
be permissible under the byelaws;
Provided that a cooperative society shall not accept share capital from the Government but may accept
other funds or guarantee from the Government on such terms and conditions as are mutually agreed
upon through a memorandum of understanding.
[Comment: This Act is called the Mutually Aided Cooperative Societies Act. By terming cooperatives
under this Act “mutually aided”, the Legislative Assembly did not intend that cooperatives under this
Act would be financially self-sufficient. It did expect that the foundation for cooperatives would be
mutual aid, in terms of finance, and also in terms of spirit, discussion, discourse.
Therefore, the Act requires cooperatives to raise share capital from members only, and expects only
such persons to be members who need the services of the cooperative and can use it. The Act also
permits cooperatives to raise other funds from members, making it clear that any amounts raised
from members, in any form, will be settled at the time of dissolution, only after all other external
accounts have been settled.
This section also provides for cooperatives to raise funds in all forms other than share capital from
non-member individuals and institutions, and to raise financial support in the shape of loans and
guarantee from the Government, based on a mutually negotiated contract. This is a clear shift from
the 1964 Act and other cooperative laws which incorporate in the law itself several rights and
privileges for the Government and/or the Registrar vis-à-vis cooperatives, regardless of the financial
support provided by the Government.
This Act foresees situations where a cooperative and the Government may wish to collaborate on
issues of mutual interest, and, therefore, requires that they sort out between themselves the terms on
which such collaboration should take place.]
15. Investment of funds outside the business A cooperative society may invest or deposit its funds in any non-speculative manner outside its
business.
[Comment: Cooperatives are businesses which come into existence not because their members have
money to invest, and not because they want a return on that investment, but because their members
have some common economic need which they cannot fulfil individually by themselves, but which they
can through joint enterprise and effort. Since cooperatives come into existence to fulfil needs which
are not being fulfilled by investment driven enterprises, therefore, most cooperative laws have
debarred cooperatives from speculative investment. Sadly, however, most cooperative laws, and in
particular Rules framed under Cooperative Acts, have taken this concept to absurd limits, requiring
cooperatives to seek the Registrar‟s permission before depositing their funds in any commercial bank,
or in any cooperative, or even before investing in their own business! The 1995 Act concentrates on
the essentials, and simply prohibits cooperatives from investing their funds in any speculative
manner. The rest it leaves to their good sense and internal regulations.]
16. Disposal of surplus (1) In any year a cooperative society shall allocate towards a deficit cover fund, reserve funds,
deferred payment to members as patronage rebate in proportion to their use of the cooperative
society's services, and payment on share capital of interest not exceeding the rate of interest paid by
scheduled banks, such percentages of the surplus arising from its business transactions in the previous
year, as may be approved by the general body. (2) Reserves created under sub-section (1) shall be
costed by crediting an annual interest equal to the rate paid by scheduled banks on fixed deposits.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
[Comment: Other cooperative laws define quite rigidly the amounts to be set aside from surplus
(profit) each year, towards various funds and reserves. This law appreciates that each cooperative
will have different uses for the surpluses generated, and that each of these uses will change from time
to time in the same cooperative. For example, in a nascent cooperative, members may prefer to
capitalise to enable expansion or absorb future losses, whereas in a well established cooperative,
members may expect more by way of rebate on their patronage of the cooperative‟s services. The
1995 Act leaves the disposal of surplus to the general body. Section 16 also requires that reserves be
costed each year, and not be treated as cost-free funds. The implications of this are (1) that surplus
will be arrived at after costing the reserves; (2) that surplus, if any, will have arisen out of the year‟s
transactions, and not be the interest earned/due on the reserves; and (3) as a result, members who
join when a cooperative is well established, will not automatically benefit from surpluses generated
out of reserves created in the early years by those members.]
17. Management of deficit (1) Where a cooperative society is left with a deficit in any given year, the board of directors shall
place before the general body in the first following annual general meeting, a detailed report on the
causes of deficit and the manner in which the deficit is proposed to be met.
(2) The general body of the cooperative society shall decide to have the deficit covered by setting it off
against the amount available in the deficit cover fund, and/or by debiting the deficit to the account of
the members in proportion to the services they had availed or were expected to avail of the cooperative
society during the year.
[Comment: Having provided for full autonomy to cooperatives under the new Act, the Act also
ensures that management is accountable to members. Deficit (loss) is to be discussed at the general
body, with the board of directors placing a report before the general body on the causes of the deficit,
and on how it is proposed to be covered. The deficit of any year is to be dealt with in the succeeding
year, and so the spectacle of a cooperative having accumulated losses is not provided for. Since
members have the right to decide who they wish to have as their directors, and to recall them if
necessary, and since surplus is available for distribution among members, therefore, deficit, too, is
for sharing by members, to the extent that it cannot be set off against reserves available for this
purpose. In the event of a cooperative registered under the 1964 Act with accumulated losses wishing
to register under this Act, this section would imply that the general body of the cooperative set off the
losses against reserves, or debit the losses to members‟ accounts, when resolving to convert to the
new Act.]
18. Reserve fund A cooperative society may create a reserve for such purpose as may be specified in the byelaws.
19. Eligibility for membership (1) Subject to the byelaws, any person who is desirous of utilising the services of the cooperative
society may express his willingness to accept the responsibilities of membership and fulfil such other
conditions as may be specified in the byelaws of the cooperative society and thereupon he may be
admitted as a member, subject however to the condition that the cooperative society is in a position to
extend its services to the applicant and that the applicant is not already a member of a cooperative
society registered under this Act, or the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 providing the
same or similar services.
(2) Admission of members and removal from membership shall be made in accordance with the
procedure specified in the byelaws, only by an elected board or by the general body where such an
elected board does not exist for the time being.
(3) A person admitted as a member may exercise the rights of membership, including the right to vote,
only on fulfilment of such conditions as may be laid down from time to time in the byelaws;
Provided that a person shall have been a member for at least one year before being eligible to exercise
the right of vote; Provided further that the above proviso shall not apply to the promoter members in
the first year of registration of a cooperative society.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
[Comment: In many cooperatives under most cooperative laws, membership is very heterogeneous,
with a majority having very low financial or other stake in the organisation. The result is that a
majority of the decisions are made by those whose interest in the cooperative is superficial or suspect
or insignificant. The 1995 Act ensures that membership is open only to those who need the services of
the cooperative, can use them, and are willing to be responsible. In particular, it is important to note
that section 9(2)(vi)and (vii) require the byelaws to fix some minimum performance standards for
members to reach in order that they exercise their rights. Election-eve enrolment of bogus members is
addressed by requiring that members vote only after a year of membership and on fulfilment of other
obligations to the cooperative. The Act does not expect a person to be a member of more than one
cooperative for the same services. Section 19 also makes a clear shift from earlier laws which
expected cooperatives to admit members whether or not they were in a position to serve them. The
1995 Act does not expect every cooperative to be the panacea for all problems facing an entire
population in an area, and leaves it to the members to decide how big they wish to grow, and how
much they can handle.]
20. General body (1) Subject to the provisions of this Act and the byelaws, the ultimate authority of a cooperative
society shall vest in its general body;
Provided that where, because of spread of number of members, a cooperative society feels the need for
constituting a representative general body for more effective decision making, it may constitute a
representative general body in such a manner and with such functions as may be specified in the
byelaws.
(2) The following matters, among others specified in the byelaws shall be dealt with by the general
body of a cooperative society, namely, (a) amendments to byelaws;
(b) election and removal of directors;
(c) consideration of,
(i) the long term perspective plan and budget;
(ii) the annual operational plan and budget;
(iii) the annual report of activities for being filed with the Registrar;
(iv) the auditor‘s report and the annual audited statement of accounts for being filed with the Registrar;
(v) special audit report or inquiry report, if any;
(vi) compliance report relating to audit, special audit and/or inquiry, if any;
(d) approval of appointment and removal of auditors;
(e) disposal of surplus;
(f) management of deficit;
(g) creation of specific reserves and other funds;
(h) review of actual utilisation of reserves and other funds;
(i) review of the chief executive‘s report on the attendance at meetings by directors and review of the
business done with the cooperative society by the directors;
(j) appointment, reconstitution and disbanding of the representative general body;
(k) remuneration payable to any director or internal auditor in connection with his duties in that
capacity or his attendance at related meetings;
(l) membership of the cooperative society in federation;
(m) collaboration with other organisations and its review;
(n) promotion of subsidiary organisations and review;
(o) dissolution of the cooperative society; and
(p) all other functions expected of the general body under the other provisions of this Act.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
[Comment: The functions of the general body in the 1995 Act are similar to those of the general body
in other cooperative laws. There are, however, a few very important distinctions. The first is that the
1995 Act expects the general body to approve the appointment or removal of auditors. This is the sole
prerogative of the Registrar in other cooperative laws! The second is that election and removal of
directors is the function of the general body, doing away with the elaborate procedure laid down by
other cooperative laws to be followed in cooperative elections as is done for General Elections. The
third is the review of the performance of directors by the general body, vis-à-vis their attendance at
meetings, and their transactions with the cooperative, not provided for by most other cooperative
laws. The last is the provision for setting up a representative general body, provided for in most other
Acts, too, but undermined by corresponding Rules.]
21. Board of directors (1) There shall be a board of directors for every cooperative society constituted and entrusted with the
direction of the affairs of the cooperative society in accordance with the provisions of the Act and the
byelaws.
(2) The size of the board shall be a multiple of the term of office of its directors.
(3) The directors of the board shall have staggered terms such that at any point of time the vacancies,
arising as a result of the terms of directors coming to an end, are less than one half of the total strength
of the board;
Provided that the term of a director shall not exceed five years;
Provided further that at the first election all the directors shall be elected at once, and their terms
staggered by drawal of lots specifying different terms.
(4) In addition to such criteria as may be specified in the byelaws, a person shall be ineligible for being
chosen as a director if such person
(a) has at any time lost the right to vote as a member or to continue as one as specified in the byelaws;
(b) incurs any other disqualification specified in the byelaws.
(5) In addition to such criteria as may be specified in the byelaws, a person shall cease to be a director
if he incurs any of the disqualifications specified in sub-section (4) or,
(a) absents himself from three consecutive board meetings without leave of absence;
(b) absents himself from general body meeting without leave of absence;
(c) is penalised under this Act.
(6) In addition to such criteria as may be specified in the byelaws, the directors of the board shall incur
disqualification for a period of three years for being chosen as directors and shall be ineligible to
continue as directors of any cooperative society if, during their term as directors of a cooperative
society,
(a) they did not conduct elections within the time specified in the byelaws and before the expiry of the
terms; (b) they did not conduct their annual general body meeting within six months of closure of the
cooperative accounting year, or a requisitioned meeting of the general body within the specified time;
(c) they did not place the audited accounts for the preceding financial year along with the report of the
auditors before the general body at its annual general meeting.
(7) In order to be eligible for being chosen as director of the board of a cooperative society which has
been in existence for more than two years a member
(a) shall have been a voting member of the cooperative society for at least two years immediately
proceeding the year of election;
(b) shall have attended the two general body meetings of the cooperative society held immediately
preceding the elections.
(8) Every director and employee of a cooperative society while exercising his powers and discharging
his duties shall, —
(a) act honestly and in good faith and in the best interests of the cooperative society; and
(b) exercise such due care, diligence and skill as a reasonably prudent person would exercise in similar
circumstances.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
(9) A director or employee who is guilty of misappropriation, breach of trust or any other omission or
commission, resulting in loss to the cooperative society as a result thereof, shall be personally liable to
make good that loss, without prejudice to such criminal action to which he is liable under the law.
[Comment: The 1995 Act requires every cooperative to have an elected board of directors, whose
members have staggered terms in office. The 1995 Act has sought, through this provision, to prevent
to the extent possible, any vacuum in management, which has been used in the past under the 1964
Act, to bring in the dreaded “Person-in-Charge” for the interregnum. By having less than half the
directors retiring at any time, the 1995 Act has tried to ensure that there is always a quorum, and a
democratically elected body is in position. Nominations to the board are not provided for, and
caste/class/gender based reservations on the board, too, have not been provided for. Since
membership is voluntary, and since multiple cooperatives can be set up for the same purpose in the
same area, and since cooperatives are autonomous and private organisations, however poor or large
their membership, the 1995 Act has left the matter of reservation to the decision of the members. It
may be worth noting that, in practice, there are cooperatives registered under the new Act which
have chosen to have such reservations on their boards, but even more important, there are any
numbers of cooperatives under the new law exclusively of the disadvantaged groups, especially of
poor women, and obviously their entire boards are made of up people of the same category, who
would otherwise have merely had token representation on the board. The Act requires high standards
of the directors, including their presence in meetings, their performance as members of the
cooperative, timely conduct of elections by them, timely conduct of general meetings, timely reporting
to the general body, timely audit, and so on. Directors are also required to make good any loss to the
cooperative arising out of their questionable action/inaction, without prejudice to any criminal action
that could be taken against them.]
22. Powers and functions of the board of directors (1) The board shall, in accordance with the byelaws, be the authority to
(a) admit and terminate membership;
(b) elect the chairperson and other office bearers;
(c) remove from office the chairperson and other office bearers;
(d) appoint and remove the chief executive;
(e) fix staff strength;
(f) frame policies concerning
(i) organisation and provision of services to members;
(ii) recruitment and conditions of service of the staff at the cooperative society;
(iii) mode of custody and investment of funds;
(iv) manner of keeping accounts;
(v) mobilisation, utilisation and investment of various funds;
(vi) monitoring and management information systems including statutory returns to be filed; and
(vii) such other subjects and matters necessary for the effective performance of the cooperative
society;
(g) place the annual report, annual financial statements, annual plan and budget for the approval of the
general body;
(h) consider audit and compliance reports and place these before the general body;
(i) review membership in other cooperatives; and (j) undertake such other functions as may be
delegated by the general body.
(2) The chairperson shall be elected by the board from among the elected members and shall, in
accordance with the byelaws,
(a) preside at meetings of the board and the general body;
(b) have only a casting vote in the event of equality of votes on any matters being decided upon by the
board;
(c) exercise such other powers as may be delegated by the board and specified in the policies framed
or resolutions adopted by the board.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
[Comment: The elected board has been given the powers to admit members, to elect the
chairperson and other office bearers, to frame business policies, personnel policies, financial
policies, and to be responsible for all such matters which the board of directors of any
business would normally be responsible for, but which boards under most cooperative laws
are not responsible for. The chairperson, too, is seen not as a contentious person desiring to
thrust his viewpoint on his/her colleagues, but as a mature person who leads a team, casting
his/her vote only in the eventuality of a matter being put to vote and the other directors voting
equally in favour and against the motion.]
23. Elections (1) The conduct of election of directors of a cooperative society shall be the responsibility of the
incumbent board of the cooperative society.
(2) Elections shall be conducted before the expiry of the term of office of the outgoing directors in the
manner specified in the byelaws.
(3) Where a board does not take necessary steps to conduct elections as specified in the byelaws
before the expiry of the term of the directors, or where there are no directors remaining on the board,
the Registrar shall, at the request of not less than twenty-five members or five per cent of the total
members of the cooperative society whichever is less or may suo moto, convene within 30 days a
general meeting for appointing an ad-hoc board for the specific purpose of conducting elections.
(4) The term of the ad-hoc board appointed under sub-section (3) shall not exceed one month over and
above the minimum period required under the byelaws to conduct elections, and the ad-hoc board shall
cease to function as soon as a regular board is elected in accordance with the byelaws.
(5) The directors shall hold office for the period for which they are elected and the newly elected
directors shall assume office at the end of this period.
(6) The directors may be eligible, for re-election, if the byelaws so provide.
[Comment: Elections used to be the responsibility of incumbent boards till mid-60s, and since then
through a series of amendments in cooperative laws across the country, elections became the
responsibility of the Registrar of Cooperatives. Through Rules, again stepping beyond the intent and
content of the Act, the Government acquired for itself the right to postpone elections indefinitely. The
1995 Act once again makes the conduct of elections an internal responsibility, providing space for
limited external intervention only if this responsibility cannot be fulfilled. Directors cannot be re-
elected for a second term, unless the byelaws provide for such re-election. That is, the 1995 Act
expects the members to apply their minds to the advantages and disadvantages of leadership
development and spread vs continuity in leadership, and to arrive at a decision they feel appropriate
in their circumstances.]
24. Meetings (1) The byelaws of a cooperative society shall specify the frequency of and manner in which board
and general body meetings shall be held, so however the board shall meet at least once in every three
months and the general body shall meet at least once a year.
(2) The board shall convene a general meeting within thirty days of receipt of a requisition for
convening a meeting signed by at least one-tenth of members of the cooperative society or as provided
in the byelaws and any such requisition shall contain the proposed agenda and the reasons why the
meeting is felt necessary.
(3) Where the board fails to convene the annual or requisitioned general meeting within due time, it
shall be competent for the Registrar to convene the requisitioned or annual general meeting, as the
case may be.
(4) Every cooperative society shall record in the minutes book, minutes of all proceedings of every
general meeting and of every meeting of its board of directors.
(5) Such minutes shall be communicated to all persons invited for the meeting within thirty days of the
conclusion of the meeting.
(6) The minutes so recorded shall be signed by the person who chaired the said meeting.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
[Comment: The Registrar has been given the right to convene a requisitioned general body meeting,
where a board fails to do so. This section also requires every cooperative to record in the minutes
book, the proceedings of all board and general meetings, and to send copies of these minutes to all
those who were invited to such meeting. No other cooperative law requires the minutes to be
communicated, and as a result, the minutes are either non-existent, or a closely guarded secret. The
1995 Act aims at greater transparency in the cooperative, which is essential if it is to be
accountable.]
25. Staff All staff of the cooperative society shall be the employees of the cooperative society and shall be fully
accountable to the cooperative society and be appointed, removed and function in accordance with
such service conditions as may be framed by the board;
Provided that a cooperative society may take personnel on deputation from other agencies including
the Government, on such terms as are mutually agreed upon.
[Comment: Most cooperative laws, including the 1964 Act, have provided for a major role for the
Registrar in setting qualifications, in recruitment, in framing service conditions, in taking
disciplinary action, etc relating to staff of cooperatives. Common cadres of staff, too, have been set
up for certain types of cooperatives. As a result, staff of cooperatives, who are, more often than not,
more privileged in society than most members, do not feel accountable to the cooperatives that they
work with. The 1995 Act makes it clear that the staff is employed by the cooperative and is
accountable to the cooperative. This should help the new generation cooperatives have more
responsible employer-employee relationships.]
26. Accounts and records (1) Every cooperative society shall keep at its office, the following accounts, records and documents,
namely:
(a) a copy of this Act with uptodate amendments incorporated;
(b) copies of other laws and regulations to which the cooperative society is subject;
(c) a copy of its registered byelaws with amendments made from time to time;
(d) the minutes book;
(e) accounts of all sums of money received and expended by the cooperative society and their
respective purposes;
(f) accounts of all purchases and sales of goods by the cooperative society;
(g) accounts of the assets and liabilities of the cooperative society;
(h) a register showing member-wise patronage of various services provided by the cooperative society;
(i) an uptodate register of all members, and a list of members with voting rights for the current year
prepared within thirty days of closure of the cooperative society‘s financial year;
(j) copies of the audit reports and special audit and/or inquiry report, if any, and compliance reports
thereon; and
(k) all such other accounts, records and documents as may be required by this Act or other laws.
(2) The books of accounts and other records shall be open for perusal by any director during business
hours.
(3) Copies of the Act, byelaws, minutes book pertaining to the general body meetings, reports and
compliance thereon of audit, special audit and inquiry, voters‘ list and such accounts as relate
to a member, shall be made available to any member during business hours at a fee to be
decided by the board. In the case of a cooperative society with unlimited liability, in addition, a
member may also have access to all books of accounts during business hours, at a fee decided
by the board.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
27. Audit (1) A cooperative society may get its accounts audited by a chartered accountant within the meaning
of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, or by any other auditor from the office of the Registrar.
(2) The general body of a cooperative society shall appoint an auditor by a resolution which will be
valid only until the close of the next succeeding annual general body meeting.
(3) The remuneration of the auditor shall be fixed with approval of the general body.
[Comment: Prior to Independence, audit by the department of cooperation was a facility available to
cooperatives, free of cost, as it was felt that cooperatives were useful in that they helped rural people
solve their own problems, but that they may find it difficult to get auditors to check their accounts.
After mid-60s, audit became a monopoly of the department of cooperation, and it had to be paid quite
heavily for. The 1964 Act, and most other cooperative laws, however, do not place any responsibility
on the auditor to complete audit in time for the annual general meeting, and also, therefore, do not
require the presentation of audited financial statements of the previous year to the general body each
year. The 1995 Act leaves the choice of auditors, from among chartered accountants and department
staff, to the cooperatives, and requires timely audit, and timely submission of auditors‟ report and
audited statements of accounts to the general body each year. Again, all these contribute to
accountability and transparency in the cooperative, which were not possible under the older law.]
28. Special audit (1) A cooperative society dealing with funds from the Government or other external individual or
institutions may be subject to a special audit initiated by the Registrar at the request of such creditor,
on such specific terms of reference as agreed to by the Registrar.
(2) The cost of special audit under sub-section (1) shall be met by the creditor;
Provided that where the special audit reveals serious mismanagement in the cooperative society, such
costs may be recovered from the cooperative society or the persons responsible for the
mismanagement.
(3) Every special audit shall be completed and the report submitted to the Registrar within one
hundred and twenty days of its commencement.
(4) The special audit report shall contain a statement of
(a) every payment which appears to the audit to be contrary to law;
(b) the amount of any deficiency, waste or loss which appears to have been caused by the gross
negligence or misconduct of any person in the performance of duties;
(c) the amount of any sum received which ought to have been accounted for but is not brought into
account by any person; and
(d) any material impropriety or irregularity which he may observe in the expenditure or in the recovery
of money due.
(5) The Registrar shall, within a period of thirty days from the date of the receipt of the special audit
report communicate copies of the same to
(a) the applicant-creditor;
(b) the cooperative society concerned; and
(c) the cooperative tribunal where necessary.
[Comment: While the 1995 Act has recognised the autonomous nature of a cooperative, and has
given it full responsibility along with independence of action, it has also permitted it to raise funds
from external sources. Therefore, to protect the interests of the external agent with financial stake in
the cooperative, at their request, special audit by the Registrar has been provided for, and copies of
the report of such special audit are expected to be submitted to the requisitionist, the cooperative
under special audit, and, if necessary, to the Cooperative Tribunal. The 1995 Act does not make the
mistake which most other cooperative laws have made, of converting the one who makes a finding
into the one who stands on judgement on his/her own finding, and then into the one who takes action
on such judgement.]
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
29. Inquiry (1) Every cooperative society shall furnish any relevant information required by the Registrar in order
to enable him to satisfy whether the cooperative society has conducted its affairs in accordance with
the cooperative principles and the provisions of this Act.
(2) The Registrar may, of his own motion, and shall on the application, of a federation to which the
cooperative society concerned is affiliated, or of a creditor to whom the cooperative society is
indebted, or of not less than one-third of the directors, or of not less than one-tenth of the members,
hold an inquiry or cause an inquiry to be made into the specific matter or matters relating to any gross
violation of any of the provisions of this Act by the cooperative society.
(3) The inquiry shall be completed within a period of one hundred and twenty days from the date of
ordering the inquiry.
(4) If the inquiry is not completed within the time specified in sub-section (3), it shall lapse at
the end of the said period and the Registrar shall refund to the applicants, the fee collected
from them.
(5) The Registrar shall, within a period of thirty days from the date of the completion of the inquiry as
specified in sub-section (3) or of the lapse of the inquiry as specified in sub-section (4), communicate
the report of the inquiry or the reasons for the non-completion of the inquiry, as the case may be,
(a) to the cooperative society concerned;
(b) to the applicant-federation, if any;
(c) to the applicant-creditor, if any;
(d) to the person designated by the applicant-directors, if any;
(e) to the person designated by the applicant-members, if any;
(f) to any person, on payment of fee fixed by the Registrar; and
(g) to the cooperative tribunal where necessary.
(6) The inquiry officer acting under this section shall, among others, specifically state the amount of
deficiency, waste or loss which appears to have been caused by the gross negligence or misconduct of
any person in the performance of this duties.
[Comment: All those with a stake in a cooperative have been given the right to request the Registrar
for an inquiry into any gross violation of any provision of the Act. Again, the Registrar is to submit
copies of the inquiry report to all concerned, but not to directly take action on the findings.]
30. Power to summon and examine persons and documents (1) The person authorised to conduct special audit under section 28 or inquiry under section 29 shall
give the concerned cooperative society not less than fifteen days notice in writing of the date on which
he proposes to commence the special audit or inquiry. Provided that for special reasons to be recorded
in writing, he may give a shorter notice than fifteen days or commence a special audit or inquiry on the
authority of the Registrar without such notice.
(2) For the purpose of any special audit or inquiry under this Act, the person conducting such audit or
inquiry may
(a) require in writing the chairperson or other authority concerned to produce at the head office of the
cooperative society such receipts, vouchers, statements, returns, correspondence, notes or any other
documents as he may consider necessary for the purpose of special audit or inquiry;
(b) require in writing (i) any employee of the cooperative society or other authority accountable for or
having the custody or control of such receipts, vouchers, statements, returns, correspondence, notes or
other documents to appear in person; or
(ii) any person having directly or indirectly any share or interest in any contract with the cooperative
society to appear in person or by an authorised agent; before him at the head office of the cooperative
society and answer any question or sign a declaration with respect thereto;
(c) in the event of an explanation being required from the chairperson or any other authority concerned
invite him in writing specifying the points on which his explanation is required to meet him at the head
office of the cooperative society; or
(d) exercise such other powers as can be reasonably said to be necessary for the purposes of this
section.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
(3) The person conducting special audit or inquiry may fix a reasonable period of not less than seven
days for the purpose of compliance of the provisions of sub-section (2), and such compliance shall be
mandatory on the persons required to provide information under sub-section (2).
31. Action on special audit or inquiry report On communication of a special audit report under sub-section (5) of section 28 or an inquiry report
under sub-section (5) of section 29 to the persons concerned, the Registrar may, where the special
audit or inquiry report reveals mismanagement on the part of any or all of the office bearers or
directors, without prejudice to any civil or criminal proceedings to which they may be liable,
(a) direct the board to convene a general body meeting within such reasonable time as he may specify,
to enable him to bring to the notice of the general body, either directly or through his nominee, the
findings of the special audit or inquiry report, for necessary action; or
(b) approach the cooperative tribunal for necessary action.
32. Constitution of tribunals (1) The Government may, for the purposes of this Act, by notification constitute as many tribunals as
may be necessary for such area or areas as may be specified in the notification.
(2) The provisions of section 75 of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 shall, mutatis-
mutandis apply for the constitution of cooperative tribunals under this section.
[Comment: The 1995 Act, although providing for the internal settlement of disputes, has also
provided for the constitution of Cooperative Tribunals, for the settlement of internal disputes, for
taking cognisance of violations of the provisions of the Act noticed by the Registrar, for deciding on
action to be taken on special audit, inquiry, etc. The manner in which the tribunals are to be
constituted is as laid down in the 1964 Act.]
33. Power of the tribunal to order recovery (1) A member, director or chairperson of the cooperative society may and the Registrar shall file a
copy of the report of the auditor or the special auditor or the inquiry officer, before the tribunal with an
application for necessary action against the person on account of whose conduct the cooperative
society has incurred loss. The tribunal may on the basis of such report disallow every item of
expenditure incurred contrary to law and order recovery of the same from the person incurring or
authorising the incurring of such expenditure, or held responsible in the said report for any deficiency,
loss or unprofitable outlay occasioned by his negligence or misconduct or of any such amount which
ought to have been accounted but is not brought into account by that person and shall, in every such
case, specify the amount liable to be paid by such person to the cooperative society.
Explanation:- It shall not be open to any person whose negligence or misconduct has caused or
contributed to any such deficiency or loss, to contend that notwithstanding his negligence or
misconduct the deficiency or loss would not have occurred, but for the negligence or misconduct of
some other person.
(2) The tribunal shall state in writing the reasons for its decision in respect of every dis-allowance,
surcharge and a copy of such decision shall be served on the person against whom it is made in the
manner laid down for the service of summons in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Provided that the
tribunal shall not pass any order of recovery under this section unless the person against whom any
such order is passed has had an opportunity of making a representation either by himself or through
the counsel.
(3) Any person aggrieved by an order passed under this section may, within sixty days after the date of
service on him of the order by the tribunal file an appeal against such order in the High Court.
(4) Where an appeal is filed in the High Court under sub-section (3), the persons who filed the
application before the tribunal or, as the case may be, the Registrar shall be the sole respondent
thereto, and the applicant shall not make any other person a party to the proceedings.
(5) Every order passed by the tribunal or an order passed by the High Court shall be executed in the
same manner as a decree of a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
34. Filing of returns (1) Every year, within thirty days of the conduct of the annual general meeting, every cooperative
society shall file the following with the Registrar, namely:
(a) annual report of activities;
(b) annual audited statements of accounts with auditors‘s report;
(c) list of members as at the close of the year under reporting with services provided to each member;
(d) statement on the disposal of surplus or on the allocation of deficit;
(e) list of names of directors, their addresses and their terms of office; and
(f) compliance reports relating to audit, special audit and inquiry, if any.
[Comment: Every cooperative is expected to file returns with the Registrar. As with the Registrar of
Societies and Registrar of Companies, such filing of returns with the Registrar will ensure that that
copy is taken as an authentic copy in the event of disputes.]
35. Rights and privileges A cooperative society shall have all the rights and privileges available to cooperative societies under
chapter-V of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 and the corresponding rules, to the
extent that they are not inconsistent with the provisions of this Act.
[Comment: Cooperatives under the old Act have certain rights and privileges, such as first charge on
the property of their members, exemptions from certain stamps and duties, and obligation on
employers – on request of cooperatives - to deduct from wages their dues to their cooperatives. The
Legislative Assembly, when enacting the new law extended these rights and privileges to cooperatives
registered under the new Act, too.]
36. Execution of decisions, decrees and orders In regard to execution of decisions, decrees and orders, all the provisions of chapter X of the Andhra
Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 shall mutatis mutandis apply to cooperative societies
registered under this Act, such however, that all references to the Registrar in the said Act shall be
construed to be a reference to the cooperative tribunal in their application to cooperative societies
registered under this Act.
[Comment: In order to enable credit cooperatives to convert easily to the new Act, all the
mechanisms available to them for the recovery of loans, etc have been incorporated in the new Act.]
36-A. Eligible cooperative banks The provisions of Chapter XIII-A containing sections 115-A and 115-B of the Andhra Pradesh
Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 shall mutatis mutandis apply to all cooperative banks.
Explanation :- For the purposes of this section a ― cooperative bank means a society registered under
this Act, which is doing the business of banking as defined in clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 5
of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.‖
[Comment: Deposit insurance and credit guarantee are available only to such cooperative banks as
are registered under a cooperative law which provides for certain rights of intervention to the
Reserve Bank of India at the time of superseding the committee of a cooperative bank, or at the time
of its amalgamation, dissolution, etc. When certain urban cooperative banks were converted from the
old Act to this Act, the RBI raised objections, requiring that either cooperative banks should not be
registered under the new Act, or that similar rights of intervention as are available under the old Act
should be provided to the RBI under the new Act. As a result, in 1998, section 36-A was incorporated
by the Legislative Assembly in the 1995 Act, giving RBI the rights it had over cooperative banks
registered under the old Act.]
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
37. Settlement of disputes (1) If any dispute arises touching the constitution, management or business of a cooperative society,
and matters connected therewith or incidental thereto,
(a) among members, past members or persons claiming through members, past members and deceased
members; or
(b) between a member, past member or a person claiming through a member, past member or deceased
member and the cooperative society, its board, director, office-bearer or liquidator, past or present, or
(c) between the cooperative society or its board and any past board, director, office bearer, or the
nominee, heirs, or legal representatives of any deceased director, deceased officer, of the cooperative
society; or
(d) between the cooperative society and any other cooperative society; or
(e) between the promoters of a cooperative society and the Registrar; or a cooperative society and the
Registrar; or
(f) between a cooperative society and liquidator of another cooperative society, or between the
liquidators of two or more cooperative societies; such disputes may be referred to the cooperative
tribunal for decision; Provided that no dispute shall be referred under this section to the cooperative
tribunal unless the disputing parties exhausted all remedies that may be available in the byelaws for
the settlement of disputes.
(2) Any dispute relating to elections held to a cooperative society may be referred to the cooperative
tribunal for decision.
[Comment: Till mid-60s, most disputes in cooperatives used to be solved through internal dispute
mechanisms. Later, however, along with government aid came involuntary mechanisms for the
settlement of disputes. Through this section, the 1995 Act has provided for cooperatives to set up their
own internal systems for the settlement of disputes, and to use the Cooperative Tribunal, only after
such remedies have been exhausted. What is also special is that employer-employee disputes are not
covered under this section. In most cooperative laws in the country, a lot of mischief has been created
by trying to take the resolution of employer-employee disputes out of the purview of industrial
disputes, and into the mechanism available for constituents of cooperatives.]
38. Offences and penalties (1) It shall be an offence under this Act, if a cooperative society
(a) fails to give a notice, send a return or document, or fails to do, or allow to be done, any act which a
cooperative society is by this Act or under its byelaws required to give, send, do or allow to be done;
(b) wilfully neglects or refuses to do an act or to furnish information required for the purposes of this
Act or does an act forbidden by this Act, or the byelaws; or
(c) makes a return, or wilfully furnishes information, in any respect false or insufficient.
(2) It shall be an offence under this Act, if any person or cooperative society contravenes the
provisions of this Act or the byelaws of a cooperative society.
(3) An offence by a cooperative society shall be deemed to have been also committed by each office-
bearer of the cooperative society bound by the byelaws thereof to fulfil the duties whereof the offence
is a breach, or if there is no such office-bearer, then by each of the directors, unless the office-bearer or
director proves to have attempted to prevent the commission of the offence.
(4) An offence under this section shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend
to one year or with fine which may extend to ten thousand rupees or with both;
Provided that where a person is guilty of misappropriation, fraud, breach of trust, cheating or any other
act involving moral turpitude, resulting in a loss to the cooperative soceity, he shall be punishable
under the relevant provisions of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
[Comment: Several responsibilities have been laid by this Act on several persons – members,
directors, office-bearers, and even registering authorities. The 1995 Act, therefore, makes it clear
that it will consider as an offence any violation of any of the provisions of the Act, by any person on
whom the Act or the byelaws place responsibility. The section above also holds all directors
responsible, if the byelaws are silent about delegating responsibility. Finally, one of the key factors
contributing to fraud in cooperatives has been that those responsible have been protected to some
extent by cooperative laws, from criminal proceedings. The 1995 Act makes it clear that such
protection is not available to such persons.]
39. Dissolution by members (1) A cooperative society may, by a special resolution, authorise its own dissolution;
Provided that a notice of the general meeting shall also be sent with an invitation to attend, to the
Registrar, to any federations of which the cooperative society is affiliated, to creditors and to any
organisation with which a partnership contract has been entered into.
(2) Invitees under the proviso of sub-section (1) shall have the right to make a representation to the
general body, if they so wish to, giving reasons why dissolution is not called for.
(3) Within fifteen days of such authorisation for dissolution, the cooperative society shall send to the
Registrar a copy of the authorisation to dissolve the cooperative society, by registered post.
(4) The authorisation approved in pursuance of sub-section (1) is required to set out the following,
namely:-
(a) the assets and liabilities of the cooperative society;
(b) the claims of creditors, and collaborators and protected share holders;
(c) the number of members;
(d) the nature and extent of the members' interest in the cooperative society; and
(e) the name of the liquidator, if appointed by the general body, or a request to the Registrar to appoint
the liquidator or a request to the Registrar to issue a certificate of dissolution where there are no assets
or liabilities;
(5) Where the Registrar receives the special resolution passed in pursuance of sub-section (1), he shall
cause at the expense of the cooperative society a notice of the special resolution to be published once a
week for two weeks in a newspaper published or distributed in the district where the registered office
of the cooperative society is located.
(6) The Registrar may require from the cooperative society, the liquidator appointed by the
cooperative society or any other person who is required to furnish information, a periodical return
showing (a) the progress of dissolution;
(b) the distribution of any undistributed surplus or reserve; and
(c) any other relevant information that he may require.
[Comment: Neither state cooperative laws, nor the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act permit the
members of a cooperative to organise the dissolution of their cooperative. They can at most
recommend the dissolution of their cooperative to the Registrar, and it is for the Registrar to take a
decision on the matter. The 1995 Act recognises that a cooperative is a creature of its members, and,
therefore, it provides for the members to choose not to continue their association with one another, to
dissolve their cooperative.]
40. Dissolution by Tribunal (1) The Registrar or an interested person may, after giving the cooperative society ninety days notice
of the proposed application, apply to the tribunal for an order dissolving the cooperative society,
where he has reasonable cause to believe that the cooperative society has no right to be or to continue
to be recognised as a cooperative society, because it
(a) obtained its registration by fraud or mistake;
(b) is serving illegal purposes;
(c) has wilfully, after notice by the Registrar, violated any of the provisions of this Act or its byelaws;
(d) is no longer operating in accordance with principles of cooperation and the provisions of this Act;
(e) has not commenced business within two years of the date of registration; or
(f) has not carried on business for the past two consecutive years.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
(2) Where an interested person applies in pursuance of this section, he shall give the Registrar notice
of his application and the Registrar is entitled to appear and be heard in person or by counsel.
(3) Where the tribunal receives an application in pursuance of this section, it may, after giving a
reasonable opportunity to the cooperative society to state its case, order that the cooperative society be
dissolved or liquidated and dissolved under the supervision of the Registrar.
(4) Where the Registrar receives an order made in pursuance of sub-section (3), he shall, (a) where the
order is to dissolve the cooperative society, issue a certificate of dissolution; or
(b) where the order is to liquidate and dissolve the cooperative society under the supervision of the
Registrar, publish a notice in a newspaper published or distributed in the district in which the
registered office of the cooperative society is situated.
[Comment: Since the registration of a cooperative under this Act is quite a simple affair, it is possible
that institutions not intending to function as cooperatives manage to get registered under this Act, in
order to obtain tax and other exemptions sometimes allowed to cooperatives. Although tax and other
authorities do review the nature of transactions in “cooperatives” before allowing for exemptions,
nonetheless, this Act has provided for the Registrar or any other interested person to move the
Cooperative Tribunal against a “cooperative” continuing to be recognised as a cooperative, if
indeed it is not functioning as one, and to seek its dissolution. The Registrar may also seek its
dissolution if it becomes defunct or does not become functional even after registration. The
registering authority has not been given the right to unilaterally dissolve a cooperative on any of
these counts, as such right may lead to unhealthy practices.]
41. Appointment of liquidator (1) Where a cooperative society is to be dissolved and no liquidator is appointed by the general body
or the tribunal, the Registrar may
(a) appoint any person as a liquidator to wind up the affairs of the cooperative society; or
(b) where he is satisfied that the cooperative society has no assets and liabilities, issue a certificate of
dissolution.
(2) The appointing authority shall fix the payment to the liquidator for his services.
[Comment: In cooperative laws across the country, only the Registrar has the right to appoint a
liquidator. The 1995 Act has provided for the appointment of a liquidator by the general body of a
cooperative, or the Cooperative Tribunal, and only where no such liquidator has been appointed, the
Registrar may appoint a liquidator. This provision ensures that the Registrar does not have an
automatic interest in the appointment of a liquidator, or in the liquidation proceedings.]
42. Duties of liquidator On his appointment, a liquidator shall
(a) immediately give notice of his appointment,
(i) in the case of liquidator not appointed by the Registrar, to the Registrar; and
(ii) to each claimant and creditor known to the liquidator;
(b) immediately publish notice of his appointment once a week for two consecutive weeks in a
newspaper published or distributed in the district where the cooperative society has its registered
office and take reasonable steps to give notice of the liquidation in every jurisdiction where the
cooperative society carries on business;
(c) place in the notice mentioned in clauses (a) and (b) a provision requiring any person
(i) indebted to the cooperative society, to render an account and pay to the liquidator at the time and
place specified any amount owing;
(ii) possessing property of the cooperative society, to deliver it to the liquidator at the time and place
specified; and
(iii) having a claim against the cooperative society, whether liquidated, unliquidated, future or
contingent, to present particulars of the claim in writing to the liquidator not later than sixty days after
the first publication of the notice;
(d) take into custody and control the property of the cooperative society;
(e) open and maintain a trust account for the moneys of the cooperative society;
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
(f) keep accounts of the moneys of the cooperative society received and paid out by him;
(g) maintain separate lists of the members, creditors and other persons having claims against the
cooperative society;
(h) where at any time he determines that the cooperative society is unable to pay or adequately provide
for the discharge of its obligations, apply to the Registrar for directions; and
(i) deliver to the Registrar, periodically as the Registrar may require, financial statements of the
cooperative society in any form that the liquidator considers proper or that the Registrar may require.
43. Powers of liquidators (1) The liquidator may
(a) retain lawyers, accountants, engineers, appraisers and other professional advisors;
(b) bring, defend or take part in any civil, criminal or administrative action or proceeding in the name
and on behalf of the cooperative society;
(c) carry on the business of the cooperative society as required for any orderly liquidation;
(d) sell by public auction any property of the cooperative society;
(e) do all acts and execute any documents in the name and on behalf of the cooperative society;
(f) borrow money on the security of the property of the cooperative society;
(g) settle or compromise any claims by or against the cooperative society; and
(h) do all other things that he considers necessary for the liquidation of the cooperative society and
distribution of its property.
(2) Where a liquidator has reason to believe that any person has in his possession or under his control
or has concealed, withheld or misappropriated any property of the cooperative society, he may apply
to the special court for an order requiring that person to appear before the court at the time and place
designated in the order and to be examined.
(3) Where the examination mentioned in sub-section (2) discloses that a person has concealed,
withheld or misappropriated property of the cooperative society, the special court may order that
person to restore the property or pay compensation to the liquidator on behalf of the cooperative
society.
(4) No liquidator shall purchase, directly or indirectly, any part of the stock-in-trade, debts or assets of
the cooperative society.
44. Final account (1) A liquidator shall pay the costs of liquidation out of the property of the cooperative society and
shall pay or make adequate provision for all claims against the cooperative society2) After paying or
making adequate provision for all claims against the cooperative society, the liquidator shall apply to
the Registrar for approval of his final accounts and for permission to distribute in money or in kind the
remaining property of the cooperative society in accordance with the byelaws.
(3) Where the Registrar approves the final accounts rendered by a liquidator in pursuance of sub-
section (2), he shall,
(a) issue directions with respect to the custody or disposal of the documents and records of the
cooperative society; and
(b) discharge the liquidator.
(4) Where the Registrar discharges a liquidator in pursuance of sub-section (3), he shall issue a
certificate of dissolution.
(5) The cooperative society ceases to exist on the date shown in the certificate of dissolution which
shall not be later than two years after the appointment of the liquidator.
[Comment: In most cooperative laws in the country, liquidators and those who appoint liquidators,
develop a vested interest in not dissolving the cooperative, and in keeping it undissolved for the
length of time that it is in a position to meet their costs and the costs of other officers. The 1995 Act
requires the liquidation proceedings to be completed within a maximum of two years from the
appointment of the liquidator, thus ensuring that liquidation proceedings are conducted briskly.]
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
45. Fee for services The Registrar may charge a reasonable fee for any of the services provided by him or by an officer
authorised by him under the provisions of this Act.
[Comment: The 1995 Act has created the space for the emergence of strong, vibrant, member-
sensitive, and member-controlled cooperatives, which should be able to pay for the services provided
by the office of the Registrar. In certain countries, the departments of cooperation have managed to
meet their costs through fee raised from services. In turn, they began to provide technical and support
services to the cooperative movement. It should be possible, over a period of time for the government
department dealing with mutually aided cooperatives to play the role of a development department.]
Statement of Objects and Reasons 1. In early 1960s, cooperative legislation all over the country underwent major changes with a view to
enabling State and Union Governments to play an active role in the promotion and development of
cooperatives. Cooperatives were viewed as important tools to be used by the state to ensure that
disadvantaged sections of people could have access to subsidised credit and other production
inputs, especially in rural areas. In Andhra Pradesh, too, at this time, the Andhra Pradesh
Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 was enacted, and although it was introduced as a consolidation of
the two earlier Acts then prevailing in Andhra and Telengana areas, respectively, it was guided by
the findings of the All India Rural Credit Survey Committee (Gorwala Committee 1954), which
recommended an active role for the state in the spread of the cooperative movement.
2. Over the years, however, increased state participation in the financing and management of
cooperatives has led to an unfortunate situation where cooperatives themselves, by and large, have
started to perceive themselves not as member-controlled, member-sensitive business, guided by the
universally accepted principles of cooperation, but as channels for government subsidies and
largesse. Sound and sustainable cooperative business, accountability, responsibility and self-
reliance have taken a back seat.
3. At a time when deregulation and liberalisation are enabling other forms of business to break new
ground, it appears necessary to enable businesses registered as cooperatives also to have at least the
same degree of freedom to conduct their affairs, if these businesses are to have a fair chance of
being able to compete successfully with other business.
4. Cooperative financing organisations, such as the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural
Development, the National Cooperative Development Corporation and the National Dairy
Development Board have also been seeking ways by which they can where possible deal directly
with cooperative societies without necessarily having to involve government.
5. Given, however, the dependence on government of several cooperative societies, either because of
the very objects of these cooperatives or because of their weak nature, it would appear not very
responsible on the part of the Government to withdraw its support and intervention altogether, or
suddenly. In the case of such cooperatives, the provisions of the AP Cooperative Societies Act,
1964 are considered necessary.
6. On the other hand, the Government recognises that there are some cooperatives which may have
some government funds but are not dependent on such funds or on government assistance in other
forms for their survival. These cooperatives need to be given greater autonomy and encouraged to
pursue the legitimate interests of their members in an effective, self-reliant, responsible,
accountable and democratic manner. The Government also recognises that enabling legislation is
required if ordinary people who expect to benefit from the cooperative form of business, without
being dependent on governmental resources, are to voluntarily promote and effectively develop
services for themselves through their own cooperative societies.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
7. In the backdrop of the above changed perception, the Government have decided to undertake
legislation in order to promote self-reliant and autonomous cooperative societies and make the
cooperative movement more vibrant in the State. The salient features of the proposed legislation
are,
(1) to enunciate the cooperative principles which primarily place an accent on voluntary, self-
financing, autonomous bodies far removed from state control;
(2) to enable not less than ten individuals belonging to different families to form a cooperative society
and confer on it the status of a body corporate;
(3) to enable the cooperative societies to regulate their functioning by framing byelaws subject to the
provisions of the Act in respect of the various matters specified in the legislation;
(4) to enable the cooperative societies to change the form or the extent of their liability, to transfer
their assets and liabilities, to divide or amalgamate in furtherance of their stated objectives;
(5) to enable the societies registered under the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 to
become cooperative societies registered under this Act by making a suitable provision therefor;
(6) to enable the cooperative societies to mobilise their own funds;
(7) to empower the cooperative societies to provide for the qualifications and disqualifications for
membership;
(8) to provide for the constitution, powers and functions of the board of directors and for matters
incidental thereto;
(9) to define the powers and functions of the general body, etc;
(10) to make the cooperative societies responsible to hold the elections and to regulate the process
thereof;
(11) to provide for proper accountability and for that purpose to conduct audit, special audit, inquiry
and for the recovery of loss caused to the society by misconduct or otherwise;
(12) to provide for the settlement of disputes by constituting a cooperative tribunal; and
(13) for other incidental and consequential matters.
8. This bill seeks to give effect to the above decisions.
Devendar Goud
Minister for Cooperation
Background note on Andhra Pradesh Mutually Aided Cooperative Societies Act 1995
The Andhra Pradesh Mutually Aided Cooperative Societies Act of 1995 broke new ground in the
history of the Indian cooperative movement. This is a cooperative law which respects the right of
members to fully own and control their own cooperative enterprise. The enactment, an act of political
courage and wisdom by the Andhra Pradesh Government, was the final step in a long effort to create a
new legislative environment for cooperatives in Andhra Pradesh. Between February and September of
1994, cooperators held several workshops in the state on the need for amending the AP Cooperative
Law. These included a workshop of credit cooperative leaders from across the state, one of dairy
cooperative leaders from all the milk unions, another of eminent cooperators, lawyers, administrators
and others, and a fourth of leaders of political parties in the state. In all the workshops, a strong
recommendation was made to the Government of Andhra Pradesh to change the cooperative law. In
mid-1994, the Cooperative Development Foundation (CDF), a Hyderabad-based organisation
committed to strengthening the cooperative movement in Andhra Pradesh, set up a Study Group on
the AP Cooperative Law, with Shri M Ramakrishnayya (former Deputy Governor, Reserve Bank of
India and former Chairman, Nabard) as chairperson, Shri K Pratap Reddy (Senior Advocate, AP High
Court) and Prof GRS Rao (Chairperson, Centre for Public Policy and Systems, Administrative Staff
College of India) as members. The Study Group presented its report to the CDF in the last week of
December 1994. The process adopted by the Study Group was as educative as the report itself. This
Study Group interviewed several cooperators, academicians, legislators, department officers,
development workers, cooperators working outside the formal framework of the cooperative law,
administrators, jurists, lawyers and others during hearings held in Hyderabad, Tirupathi, Vijayawada,
Visakhapatnam and Warangal. It also sent out a questionnaire to several persons associated with
cooperatives in Andhra Pradesh, elsewhere in India, and abroad.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
The Study Group reviewed reports of earlier committees on cooperatives mainly the report of the
Choudhury Brahma Prakash Committee and the Model Act drafted by it. It also reviewed judgements
of the AP High Court relating to cooperatives, as well as judgements of the Supreme Court relating to
fundamental rights - the right to equality before the law, the right to form association and the right to
practice any business - as applicable to cooperatives. The report of the Study Group was formally
presented to the Government of Andhra Pradesh on 2nd February 95, at a special function at which
Shri LC Jain, former Planning Commission Member responsible for the setting up of the Brahma
Prakash Committee and Shri Devender Goud, Minister for Cooperation, were the chief guests. The
Secretary (Cooperation) and Registrar of Cooperatives were also present. Shri Jain and Shri Goud had
also met the Chief Minister Shri NT Rama Rao, and discussed with him the need to change the
cooperative law so that cooperatives could enjoy at least the same degree of freedom as available to
other forms of business. The Chief Minister assured them that his government was committed to
guaranteeing cooperatives full autonomy. Dr V Kurien, Chairman, National Dairy Development
Board, and Dr A Appa Rao, President, Cooperative Development Foundation, met and urged the
Chief Minister to amend the cooperative law to be in consonance with the principles of cooperation.
The Chief Minister unequivocally expressed his commitment to freeing cooperatives from oppressive
legislation, and enabling them to function as member-controlled, member-sensitive, competitive,
voluntary, self-reliant business.
Shri Devender Goud, Minister for Cooperation, Shri VS Sampath, Secretary to the Government, Shri
S Bhalerao, Registrar of Cooperative Societies, and Dr N Jayaprakash Narayan, Secretary to the Chief
Minister, held discussions with several well wishers, development financing agencies and constituents
of the cooperative movement within and outside Andhra Pradesh. Thereafter, the AP Mutually Aided
Cooperative Societies Bill 1995 was drafted.
The Chief Minister discussed the draft in detail with the Minister. The cabinet, after careful review of
the draft, gave its approval. On 4th
May 1995, during the debate on the Bill in the Legislative
Assembly, representatives of all parties - Telugu Desam, Congress, CPI, CPM, BJP - stated their
strong support for this initiative, and when the matter was brought to a vote, it was passed without
dissent. The Andhra Pradesh Mutually Aided Cooperative Societies Act 1995 is a milestone in the
history of the Indian cooperative movement, and it needed a government with foresight, a government
with a holistic appreciation of economic liberalisation, of deregulation, of decentralisation, to bring
about this momentous change.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
Comparison of AP Cooperative Laws of 1964 and 1995
Andhra Pradesh
Cooperative Societies Act, 1964
Andhra Pradesh Mutually Aided
Cooperative Societies Act, 1995
1. Principles of Cooperation Not stated in the Act Principles of cooperation as internationally
accepted at the time of enactment are incorporated
in the Act
2. Role of Government
Appoints Registrar; can direct Registrar; can postpone
elections; can exempt cooperatives from legal provisions;
can nominate directors to board; can appoint persons-in-
charge for state level federations; frames rules; can
handle appeals, revisions, reviews; can give directions to
cooperatives regarding reservations on staff; can hold
equity in cooperatives; sets up Special Courts and
Tribunals
Appoints Registrar; can not provide share capital,
but may provide other funds and guarantee to
cooperatives based on memorandum of
understanding that it may enter into with
cooperative; sets up Special Courts and Tribunals
3. Role of Registrar
Registers cooperative at his discretion; registers byelaws;
must approve of transfer of assets & liabilities, of
division, of amalgamation; can compulsorily
amalgamate, divide, etc; can classify cooperatives; can
amend byelaws compulsorily; must approve of all bylaw
amendments; can admit members; must approve of
expulsion of members; can disqualify committee
members; can call for special general meetings and for
meetings of no-confidence; conducts elections; can
supersede committees; appoints persons-in-charge; can
give directions for cooperatives; fixes honorarium to
president; approves of bank in which deposits can be
kept; must approve of investments in own business;
audits; inspects; inquires; can summon documents etc;
can surcharge; can suspend officers; settles disputes;
winds up cooperative; appoints liquidator; can cancel
registration; can recover dues; serves on cooperative
tribunal; sanctions institution of prosecution; handles
appeals, revisions, reviews; can appoint supervisory staff
in cooperatives; constitutes common cadres; approves of
staffing pattern; must approve of appointment/removal of
chief executive where cooperative is in receipt of
government aid
Has to register cooperative and its byelaws if they
are in consonance with the Act; registers
amendments to certain bylaw provisions; takes on
record amendments to most bylaw provisions;
convenes general body meeting where a board fails
to do so in stipulated time; receives annual reports
and audited financial statements; inquires; can
conduct special audit where non-member funds are
involved; can recommend dissolution to the tribunal
if a cooperative works in contravention of the Act
and principles of cooperation, etc
4. Rules
The government is empowered to make rules on every
subject covered by the Act
There is no rule-making power. All affairs of a
cooperative are to be regulated by the provisions of
the Act and the byelaws of the cooperative
5. Multiplicity of cooperatives
Registration can be refused because of non-viability,
conflict of area of jurisdiction, for same class of
cooperative
Registration cannot be refused except if byelaws are
not in accordance with Act, therefore, multiplicity
of organisations possible Registrar does not have
the right to classify cooperatives
6. Membership
In matters of admission, disqualification and expulsion
of members, the Registrar has final say
Admission disqualification and expulsion of
members are the exclusive prerogative of the
cooperative
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
7. Management
Size of board fixed; term of board fixed; composition of
board fixed; elections by Registrar; reservations on board
Size, term, composition of board left to byelaws;
staggered terms; elections by incumbent board
failing which by ad-hoc committee; disqualification
of all directors for not conducting elections in time,
for not conducting general body meetings in time,
for not placing audited accounts before annual
general meeting
8. Staff
Common cadre possible; too little authority with board;
Registrar must approve staffing pattern, service
conditions, salaries, etc; an improve deputationists from
government
All staff fully accountable to cooperative;
deputationists from government and other
organisations possible if a cooperative so deserves
9. Share capital
Government and other non-members may contribute
share capital
Members alone can contribute share capital and
non-member share capital is forbidden
10. Mobilisation of funds
Cooperatives may mobilise funds within the limits fixed
by Registrar
Cooperatives may mobilise funds within the limits
fixed by byelaws
11. Investment of funds
Investment of funds even in own business restricted;
lending limits are fixed by Registrar
No restriction in investment in own business, but
other investments to be in any non-speculative
manner specified by byelaws
12. Deficit
The issue of deficit not addressed; accumulated deficits
are dealt with at the time of liquidation
Deficit is required to be analysed and dealt with on
an annual basis; members have to meet the deficit
in proportion to their actual use or commitment to
the use of the services of the cooperative during the
year, if the deficit cannot be set off against reasons
13. Audit
Audit is the responsibility of audit wing of the
department; choice of auditors not available to
cooperatives; no penalty for non-conduct of audit
Audit is the responsibility of the board; auditor to
be chartered accountant or from Registrar‘s office
at cooperative‘s discretion; non presentation of
audit report to general body in stipulated time
results in disqualification of all directors
14. Subsidiaries
No subsidiary organisation can be set up by a
cooperative
Subsidiary organisations may be set up by a
cooperative
15. Rights and privilages
Exemptions from payments of contains stamps, duties,
etc
Same as available in 1964 Act
16. Disputes
Registrar or his appointee is the sole arbitrator Bylaws must contain manner of settlement of
disputes, only after which Tribunal has been given
role; Registrar has no role
17 Offences
Offences to be tried by Special Courts; several offences
mentioned in detail and their penalties, too; prior
permission of Registrar necessary for prosecution
Special Courts to look at offences; directors and
officers to prove that they tried to prevent offence,
otherwise held responsible for the offence; any
affected party can move Special Court; any persons
entrusted with responsibility by the Act will be
deemed to have committed offences if the
responsibility is neglected
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
18. Dissolution
Only by Registrar, only in the event of poor functioning;
voluntary dissolution by members is not possible; no
time limit on liquidation proceedings
By members and by Tribunal; not just because of
non-viability, but also because of lack of interest in
continuing cooperative; for not functioning in
accordance with the Act and Principles of
Cooperation; liquidations proceedings to be
completed in 2 years
19. Final disposal of assets
After dissolution, surplus assets of a cooperative will
vest in Registrar
After dissolution, surplus assets of a cooperative
will be disposed of in accordance with the bylaws
of that cooperative
20. Cooperative
Projected as an instrument for public good, as channal
for distribution of government resources
Defined as instrument of its members for their
economic social betterment, based on mutual aid.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
ANNEX 10: THE COMPANIES (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2002.
THE COMPANIES (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2002
No 1 of 2003 [31st December 2002]
An Act, further to amend the Companies Act, 1956
Be it enacted by Parliament in the Fifty-third Year of the Republic of India as follows:-
1. Short title and commencement
(1) This Act may be called the companies (Amendment) Act, 2002. (2) It shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the
Official Gazette, appoint.
2. Insertion of new Part IXA
In the Companies Act, 1956, after Part IX, the following Part shall be inserted namely: -
PART IXA
Chapter I. Producer Companies
581A. In this Part, unless the context otherwise requires
3. Definitions
(a) ―active Member‖ means a member who fulfils the quantum and period of patronage of the
Producer Company as may be required by the articles;
(b) ―Chief Executive‖ means an individual appointed as such under Sub-section (1) of section 581
W;
(c) ―limited return‖ means the maximum dividend as may be specified by the articles;
(d) ―Member‖ means a person or Producer institution (whether incorporated or admitted as a
Member of a Producer Company and who retains the qualification necessary for continuance
as such;
(e) ―inter-State cooperative society‖ means a multi-State cooperative society as defined in clause
(k) of section 3 of the Multi-State Cooperative societies Act, 1984 and includes any
cooperative society registered under any other law for the time being I force, which has,
subsequent to its formation, extended any of its objects to more than one State by enlisting the
participation of persons or by extending any of its activities outside the State, whether directly
or indirectly or through an institution of which it is a Constituent.
(f) ―mutual assistance principles‖ means the principles set out in sub-section (2) of section 581G;
(g) ―officer‖ includes any director or Chief Executive or Secretary or any person in accordance
with whose directions or instructions part or whole of the business of the Producer Company
is carried on;
(h) ―patronage‖ means the use of services offered by the Producer Company to its Members by
participation in its business activities;
(i) ―patronage bonus‖ means payments made by a Producer Company out of its surplus income
to the Members in proportion to their respective patronage;
(j) ―primary produce‖ means-
(i) produce of farmers, arising from agriculture (including animal husbandry, horticulture,
floriculture, pisciculture, viticulture, forestry, forest products, re-vegetation, bee raising
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
and farming plantation products), or from any other primary activity or service which
promotes the interest of the farmers or consumers; or
(ii) produce of persons engaged in handloom, handicraft and other cottage industries;
(iii) any product resulting from any of the above activities, including by-products of such
products;
(iv) any product resulting from an ancillary activity that would assist or promote any of the
aforesaid activities or anything ancillary thereto;
(v) any activity which is intended to increase the production of anything referred to in sub-
clauses (1) to (iv) or improve the quality there of;
(k) ―Producer‖ means any person engaged in any activity connected with or relatable to any
primary produce;
(l) ―Producer Company‖ means a body corporate having objects or activities specified in section
581B and registered as Producer Company under this Act;
(m) ―Producer institution‖ means a Producer Company or any other institution having only
producer or producers or Producer Company or Producer companies as its member whether
incorporated or not having any of the objects referred to in section 581B and which agrees to
make use of the services of the Producer Company or producer companies as provided in its
articles.
(n) ―with held price‖ means part of the price due and payable for goods supplied by any Member
to the Producer Company; and as withheld by the Producer Company for payment on a
subsequent date.
Chapter 2. Information of Producer Companies and other Matters
581B Objects of Producer Company
(1) The objectives of the Producer Company shall relate to all or any of the following
matters, namely:-
(a) production, harvesting, procurement, grading, pooling, handling, marketing, selling,
export of primary produce of the Members or import of goods or services for their
benefit: provided that the Producer Company may carry on any of the activities
specified in this clause either by itself or through institution
(b) processing including preserving, drying, distilling, brewing, vinting canning and
packaging of produce of its members;
(c) manufacture, sale or supply of machinery, equipment or consumables mainly to its
Members;
(d) providing education on the mutual assistance principles to its Members and others;
(e) rendering technical services, consultancy services, training research and
development and all other activities for the promotion of the interests of its
Members;
(f) generation, transmission and distribution of power, revitalisation of land and water
resources, their use, conservation and communications relatable to primary produce;
(g) insurance of producers or their primary produce;
(h) promoting techniques of mutuality and mutual assistance;
(i) welfare measures or facilities for the benefit of members as may be decided by the
Board.
(j) any other activity, anchillary or incidental to any of the activities referred to in
clauses (a) to (i) or other activities which may promote the principles of mutuality
and mutual assistance amongst the Members in any other manner;
(k) financing of procurement, processing, marketing or other activities specified in
clauses (a) to (j) which include extending of credit facilities or any other financial
services to its Members.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
(2) Every Producer Company shall deal primarily with the produce of its active Members
for carrying out any of its objects specified in this section.
581C Formation of Producer Company and its registration
(1) Any ten or more individuals, each of them being a producer or any two or more Producer
institutions, or a combination of ten or more individuals and producer institutions,
desirous of forming a Producer Company having its objects specified in section 581B and
otherwise complying with the requirements of this Part and the provision of this Act in
respect of registration, may form an incorporated Company as a Producer Company under
this Act
(2) If the Registrar is satisfied that all the requirements of this Act have been complied with in
respect of registration and matters precedent and incidental thereto, he shall, within thirty
days of the receipt of the documents required for registration, register the memorandum,
the articles and other documents, if any, and issue a certificate of incorporation under this
Act.
(3) A Producer Company so formed shall have the liability of its Members limited by the
memorandum to the amount, if any, unpaid on the shares respectively held by them and be
termed a company limited by shares.
(4) The Producer Company may reimburse to its promoters all direct costs associated with the
promotion and registration of the company including registration legal fees, printing of a
memorandum and articles and the payment there of shall be subject to the approval at its
first general meeting of the Members.
(5) On registration under sub-section (1) the Producer Company shall become a body
corporate as if it is a private limited company to which the provisions contained in this
Part apply, without, however, any limit to the number of Members thereof, and the
Producer Company shall not, under any Circumstances, whatsoever, become or be deemed
to become a public limited company under this Act.
581D Membership and voting rights of Members of Producer Company
(1) (a) In a case where the membership consists solely of individual members, the voting
rights shall be based on a single vote for every Member, irrespective of his
shareholding or patronage of the Producer Company.
(b) In a case where the membership consists of producer institutions only, the voting
rights of such Producer institutions shall be determined on the basis of their
participation in the business of the Producer Company in the previous year, as may be
specified by articles: Provided that during the first year of registration of a Producer
Company, the voting rights shall be determined on the basis of the shareholding by
such producer institutions.
(c) In case where the membership consists of individuals and Producer institutions, the
voting rights shall be computed on the bases of a single vote for every Member.
(2) The articles of any Producer Company may provide for the conditions, subject to which a
Member may continue to retain his membership, and the manner in which voting rights
shall be exercised by the Members.
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in Sub-section (I) or sub-section (2) any Producer
Company may, if so authorised by its articles, restrict the voting rights to active Members,
in any special or general meeting.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
(4) No person, who has any business interest which is in conflict with business of the
producer shall become a Member of that Company.
(5) A Member, who acquires any business interest which is in conflict with the business of the
Producer Company, shall cease to be a Member of that Company and be removed as a
Member in accordance with articles.
581E Benefits to Members
(1) Subject to provision made in articles, every Member shall initially receive only such value
for the produce or products pooled and supplied as the Board of Producer Company may
determine, and the withheld price may be disbursed later in cash or kind or by allotment of
equity shares, in proportion to the produce supplied to the Producer Company during the
financial year to such extent and in such manner and subject to such conditions as may be
decided by the Board.
(2) Every Member shall, on the share capital contributed, receive only a limited return:
Provided that every such Member may be allotted bonus shares in accordance with the
provisions contained in section 581ZJ.
(3) The surplus if any, remaining after making provision for payment of limited return and
reserves referred to in section 581ZI, may be disbursed as patronage bonus, amongst the
Members, in proportion to their participation in the business of the Producer Company,
either in cash or by way of allotment of equity shares, or both, as may be decided by the
Members at the general meeting.
581F Memorandum of Producer Company
The memorandum of association of every Producer Company shall state-
(a) the name of the company with ―Producer Company Limited ― as the last words of the
name of such Company;
(b) the state in which the registered office of the Producer Company is to situate;
(c) the main objects of the Producer Company shall be one or more of the objects specified in
section 581B;
(d) the names and addresses of the person who have subscribed to the
memorandum;
(e) the amount of share capital with which the Producer Company is to be registered and
division thereof into shares of a fixed amount;
(f) the names, address and occupation of the subscribes being producers, who shall act as the
first directors in accordance with sub-section (2) of section 581J;
(g) that the liability of its members is limited;
(h) opposite to the subscribes name the number of shares each subscriber takes: Provided that
no subscriber shall take less than one share;
(i) in case the objects of the Producer Company are not confined to one state, the States to
whose territories the objects extend.
581G Articles of association
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
(1) There shall be presented, for registration to the Registrar of the State to which the
registered office of the Producer Company is, stated by the memorandum of association,
to be situate-
(a) memorandum of the Producer Company;
(b) its articles duly signed by the subscribes to the memorandum.
(2) The articles shall contain the following mutual assistance principles,
namely:-
(a) the membership shall be voluntary and available, to all eligible persons who, can
participate or avail of the facilities or service of the Producer Company, and are
willing to accept the duties of membership;
(b) each Member shall, save as otherwise provided in this part, have only a single vote
irrespective of the share holding;
(c) each Producer Company shall be administered by a Board consisting of persons
elected or appointed as directors in the manner consistent with the provisions of this
part and the board shall be accountable to the Members;
(d) save as provided in this part, there shall be limited return on share capital;
(e) the surplus arising out of the operations of the Producer Company shall be distributed
in an equitable manner by-
(i) providing for the development of the business of the Producer Company
(ii) providing for common facilities; and
(iii) distributing amongst the Members,as may be admissible in proportion to their
respective participation in the business;
(f) provision shall be made for the education of Members, employees and others, on the
priniciples of mutuality and techniques of mutual assistance;
(g) the Producer Company shall actively cooperate with other Producer Companies (and
other organisation following similar principles) at local, national or international level
so as to best serve the interest of their Members and the communities it purports to
serve.
(3) Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provision of sub-sections (1) and (2),
the articles shall contain the following provisions, namely: -
(a) the qualification for membership, the conditions for continuance or cancellation of
membership and the terms, conditions and procedure for transfer of shares;
(b) the manner of ascertaining the patronage and voting right based on patronage;
(c) subject to the provisions contained in sub-section (1) of section 581N, the manner of
constitution of the Board, its powers and duties, the minimum and maximum number
of directors, manner of election and appointment of directors and retirement by
rotation, qualification for being elected or continuance as such and the terms of office
of the said directors, their powers and duties, conditions for election or co-option of
directors, method of removal of directors and the filling up of vacancies on the Board,
and the manner and the terms of appointment of the Chief Executive;
(d) the election of Chairman, term of office of directors and the Chairman, manner of
voting at the general or special meetings of Members, procedure for voting, by
directors at meetings of the Board, powers of the Chairman and the circumstances
under which the Chairman may exercise a casting vote.
(e) The circumstances under which, and the manner in which, the withheld price is to be
determined and distributed;
(f) The manner of disbursement of patronage bonus in cash or by issue of equity shares,
or both;
(g) The contribution to be shared and related matters referred to in sub-section (2) of
section 581ZI;
(h) The matters relating to issue of bonus shares out of general reserves as set in section
581ZJ;
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
(i) The basis and manner of allotment of equity shares of the Producer Company in lieu
of the whole or part of sale proceeds of produce or products supplied by the Members;
(j) The amount of reserves, sources from which funds may be raised limitation on raising
of funds, restriction on the use of such funds and the extent of debt that may be
contracted and the conditions thereof;
(k) The credit, loans or advances which may be granted to a Member and the conditions
for the grant of the same ;
(l) The right of any Member to obtain information relating to general business of the
company;
(m) The basis and manner of distribution and disposal of funds available after meeting
liabilities in the event of dissolution or liquidation of the Producer Company;
(n) The authorisation for division, amalgamation, merger, creation of subsidiaries and the
entering into joint ventures and other matters connected therewith;
(o) Laying of the memorandum and articles of the Producer Company before a special
general meeting to be held within ninety days of its registration;
(p) Any other provision, which the Members may, by special resolution recommended to
be included in articles.
581H Amendment of memorandum
(1) A Producer Company shall not alter the conditions contained in its memorandum except in
the cases, by the mode and to the extent for which express provision is made in this Act.
(2) A Producer Company may, by special resolution, not in consistent with section 581B, alter
its objects specified in its memorandum.
(3) A copy of the amended memorandum, together with a copy of the special resolution duly
certified by two directors, shall be field with the Registrar within thirty days from the date
of adoption of any resolution referred to in sub-section (2):
Provided that in the case of transfer of the registered office of a Producer Company from
the Jurisdiction of one Registrar to another, certified copies of the special resolution
certified by two directors shall be filed with both the Registrars with in thirty days, and
each Registrar shall record the same, and there upon the Registrar from whose jurisdiction
the office is transferred, shall forthwith forward to the other Registrar all documents
relating to the Producer Company.
(4) The alteration of the provision of memorandum relating to the change of the place of its
registered office from one State to another shall not take effect unless it is confirmed by
the Company Law Board on Petition.
581-I Amendment of articles
(1) Any amendment of the articles shall be proposed by not less than two-third of the elected
directors or by not less than one-third of the Members of the Producer Company, and
adopted by the Members by a special resolution.
(2) A copy of the amended articles together with the copy of the special resolution, both duly
certified by two directors, shall be filed with the Registrar within thirty days from the date
of its adoption.
581J Option to inter-state cooperative societies to become Producer Companies
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) of section 581C, any inter-State
cooperative society with objects not confined to one State may make an application to the
Registrar for registration as Producer Company under this Part.
(2) Every application under sub-section (1) shall be accompanied by-
(a) a copy of the special resolution, of not less than two-third of total members of inter-
state cooperative society, for its incorporation as a Producer Company under this Act;
(b) a statement showing-
(i) names and addresses or the occupation of the directors and Chief Executive, if
any, by whatever name called, so such cooperative and
(ii) list of members of such inter-State cooperative society;
(c) a statement indicating that the inter-state cooperative society is engaged in any one or
more of the objects specified in section 581B;
(d) A declaration by two or more directors of the inter-state cooperative society certifying
that particulars given in clauses (a) to (c) are corrected.
(3) When an inter-state cooperative society is registered as a Producer Company, the words
―Producer Company Limited‖ shall from part of its name with any word or expression to
show its identify preceding it.
(4) On compliance with the requirements of sub-section (1) to (3), the Registrar shall, within a
period of thirty days of the receipt of application, certify under his hand that the inter-state
cooperative society applying for registration is registered and there by incorporated as a
Producer Company under this Part.
(5) A cooperative society formed by producers, by Federation or Union of cooperative
societies of producers or cooperatives of producers, registered under any law for the time
being in force which has extended its objects outside the State, either directly or through a
union or federation of cooperatives of which it is a constituent, as the case may be, and
any federation or Unions of such cooperatives, which has so extended any of its objects or
activities outside the State, shall be eligible to make an application under sub-section (1)
and to obtain registration as a Producer Company under this part.
(6) The inter-state Cooperative society shall, upon registration under sub-section (1), stand
transformed into a Producer Company, and thereafter shall be governed by the provisions
of this part of the exclusion of the law by which it was earlier governed save in so far as
anything done or omitted to be done before its registration anything contained in any other
law for the time being in force, no person shall have any claim against the cooperative
institution or the company by reason of such conversion or transformation.
(7) Upon registration as Producer Company, the Registrar of Companies who registers the
company shall forthwith intimate the Registrar with whom the erstwhile inter-state
cooperative society was earlier registered for appropriate deletion of the society from its
register.
581k Effect of incorporation of Producer Company
Every shareholder of the inter-state cooperative society immediately before the date of
registration of Producer Company (hereafter referred to as the transformation date) shall be
deemed to be registered on and from that date as a shareholder of the Producer Company to
the extent of the face value of the shares held by such shareholder.
581L Vesting of undertaking in Producer Company
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
(1) All properties and assets, movable and immovable, of or belonging to, the inter-state
cooperative society as on the transformation date, shall vest in the Producer Company.
(2) All the rights debts, liabilities, interests, privileges and obligation of the inter-state
cooperatives society as on the transformation date shall stand transferred to, and be the
rights, debts, liabilities, interests, privileges and obligation of, the Producer Company.
(3) Without prejudice to the provisions contained in sub-section (2), all debts, liabilities and
obligation incurred, all contracts entered into and all matters and things engaged to be
done by, with or for, the society as on the transformation date for or in connection with
their purposes, shall be deemed to have been incurred, entered into, or engaged to be done
by, with or for, the Producer Company.
(4) All sums of money due to inter-state cooperative society immediately before the
transformation date shall be deemed, to be due to the Producer Company.
(5) Every organisation, which was being managed before immediately before the
transformation date by the inter-state cooperative society shall be managed by the
Producer Company for such period, to such extent and in such manner as the
circumstances may require.
(6) Every organisation which was getting financial, managerial or technical assistance from
the inter-state cooperative society, immediately before the transformation date, may
continue to be given financial, managerial or technical assistance, as the case may be, by
the Producer Company, for such period, to such extent and in such manner as that
company may deem fit.
(7) The amount representing the capital of the erstwhile inter-state cooperative society shall
form part of the capital of the Producer Company.
(8) Any reference to the inter-state cooperative society in any law other than this Act or in any
contract or other instrument shall be deemed to be reference to the Producer Company.
(9) If, on the transformation date, there is pending any suit, arbitration, appeal or other legal
proceeding of whatever nature by or against the inter-state cooperative society, the same
shall not abate, be discontinued or be in any way prejudicially affected by reason of the
incorporation of the Producer Company under section 581C or transformation of the inter-
state cooperative society as a Producer Company under section 581J, as the case may be,
but the suit arbitration, appeal or other proceeding, may be continued, prosecuted and
enforced by or against the Producer Company in the same manner and to the same extent
as it would have, or may have been continued, prosecuted and enforced by or against the
inter-state cooperative society as if the provisions contained in this Part had not come into
force.
581M Concession etc to be deemed to have been granted to Producer Company
With effected from the transformation date, all fiscal and other concessions, license, benefits,
privileges and exemptions granted to the inter-state cooperative society in connection with the
affairs and business of the inter-state cooperative society under any law for the time being in
force shall be deemed to have been granted to the Producer Company.
581N Provisions in respect of officers and other employees of inter-State cooperative society
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in section 581-O, all the directors in the inter-state
cooperative society before the incorporation of the Producer Company shall continue in
office for a period of one year from the transformation date and in accordance with the
provisions of this Act.
(2) Every officer or other employee of the inter-state cooperative society (except a director of
the Board, Chairman or Managing Director) serving in its employment immediately
before the transformation date shall, in so far as such officer or other employee is
employed in connection with the inter-state cooperative society which has vested in the
Producer Company by virtue of this Act, become as from the transformation date, an
officer or as the case may be, other employee of the Producer Company and shall hold his
office or service therein by the same tenure, all the same remuneration, upon the same
terms and conditions. With the same obligations and scheme, medical benefit scheme,
insurance, provident fund, other funds, retirement, voluntary retirement, gratuity and other
benefits as he would have held under the erstwhile inter-state cooperative society if its
undertaking had not vested in the Producer Company and shall continue to do so as an
officer or, as the case may be, other employee of the Producer Company
(3) Where an officer or other employee of the inter-state cooperative society opts under sub-
section (2) not to be in employment or service of the Producer Company such officer or
other employee shall be deemed to have resigned.
(4) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 or in any other
law for the time being in force, the transfer of the services of any officer or other
employees of the inter-state cooperative society to the Producer Company shall not entitle
such officer or other employee to any compensation under this Act or under any other law
the time being in force and no such claim shall be entertained by any court, tribunal or
other authority.
(5) The officers and other employees who have retired before the transformation date from
the service of the inter-state cooperative society and are entitled to any benefits, rights or
privileges, shall be entitled to receive the same benefits, rights or privileges from the
Producer Company.
(6) The trusts of the provident fund or the gratuity fund of the inter-state cooperative society
and any other bodies created for the welfare of officer or employees shall continue to
discharge function in the Producer Company as was being done hitherto in the inter-state
cooperative society and any tax exemption granted to the provident fund or the gratuity
fund would continue to be applied to the Producer Company.
(7) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act or any other law for the time being in
force or in the regulations of the inter-state cooperative society, no director of the Board
Chairman, Managing Director or any other person entitled to manage the whole or
substantial part of the business and affairs of the inter-state cooperative society shall be
entitled to any compensation against the inter-state cooperative society or the Producer
Company for the loss of Office or for the premature termination of any contract of
management entered into by him with the inter-state cooperative society.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
Chapter 3 Management of Producer Company
581-O Number of directors
Every Producer Company shall have at least five and not more than fifteen directors:
Provided that in the case of an inter-sState cooperative society incorporated as a Producer
Company, such company may have more than fifteen directors for a period of one year from
the date of its incorporation as a Producer Company.
581P Appointment of directors
(1) Save as provided in section 581N, the Members who sign the memorandum and the
articles may designate there in the Board of Directors (not less than five) who shall govern
the affairs of the Producer Company until the directors are elected in accordance with the
provisions of this section.
(2) The election of directors shall be conducted with in period of ninety days of the
registration of the Producer Company:
Provided that in the case of an inter-state cooperative society which has been registered as
a Producer Company under sub-section (4) of section 581J in which at least five directors
including the directors continuing in office under sub-section (1) of section 581N hold
office as such on the date of registration of such company, the provision of this sub-
section shall have effect as if for the words ―ninety days‖ the words three hundred and
sixty five days‖ had been substituted.
(3) Every person shall hold office of a director for a period not less than one year but not
exceeding five years as may be specified in the articles.
(4) Every director, who retires in accordance with the articles, shall be eligible for re-
appointment as a director.
(5) Save as provided in sub-section (2), the directors of the board shall be elected or appointed
by the Members in the annual general meeting.
(6) The Board may co-opt one or more expert directors or an additional director not exceeding
one-fifth of the total number of directors or appoint any other person as additional director
for such period as the Board may deem fit:
Provided that the expert directors shall not have the right to vote in the election of the
Chairman but shall be eligible to be elected as Chairman, if so provided by its articles:
Provided further that the maximum period, for which the expert director or the additional
director holds office, shall not exceed such period as may be specified in the articles
581Q Vacation of office by directors
(1) The office of the director of a Producer Company shall become vacant if –
(a) he is convicted by a Court of any offence involving moral turpitude and sentenced in
respect there of to imprisonment for not less than six months;
(b) the Producer Company, in which he is a director, has made a default in repayment of
any advances or loans taken from any company or institution or any other person and
such default continues for ninety days;
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
(c) ha has made a default in repayment of any advances or loans taken from the Producer
Company in which he is a director;
(d) the Producer Company, in which he is a director-
(i) has not filed the annual accounts and annual return for any continuous three
financial years commencing on or after the 1st day of April, 2002;or
(ii) has failed to, repay its deposit or withheld price or patronage bonus or interest
thereon on due date, or pay divided and such failure continues for one year or
more;
(e) default is made in holding election for the office of director, in the Producer Company
in which he is a director, in accordance with the provisions of this Act and articles;
(f) the annual general meeting or extraordinary general meeting of the Producer
Company, in which he is a director, is not called in accordance with the provisions of
this Act except due to natural calamity or such other reason.
(2) The provisions of sub-section (1) shall, as far as may be, apply to the director of a
producer institution which is a member of a Producer Company.
581R Powers and functions of Board
(1) Subject to the provision of this Act and articles, the board of directors of a Producer
Company shall exercise all such powers and to do all such acts and things, as that
company is authorised so to do
(2) In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing powers, such powers
may include all or any of the following matters, namely:-
(a) determination of the dividend payable;
(b) determination of the quantum of withheld price and recommend patronage to be
approved at general meeting;
(c) admission of new Members;
(d) pursue and formulate the organisational policy, objectives, establish specific long-
term and annual objectives, and approve corporate strategies and financial plans;
(e) appointment of Chief Executive and such other officers of the Producer Company, as
may be specified in the articles;
(f) exercise superintendence, direction and control over Chief Executive and other
officers appointed by it;
(g) cause proper books of account to be maintained; prepare annual accounts to be placed
before the annual general meeting with the auditor‘s report and the replies on
qualifications, if any, made by the auditors;
(h) acquisition or disposal of property of the Producer Company in its ordinary course of
business;
(i) investment of the funds of the Producer Company in the ordinary course of its
business;
(j) sanction any loan or advance, in connection with the business activities of the
Producer Company to any Member, not being a director or his relative;
(k) take such other measures or do such other acts as may be required in this discharge of
its functions or exercise of its powers.
(3) All the powers specified in sub-section (1) and (2) shall be exercised by the Board, by
means of resolution passed at its meeting on behalf of the Producer Company.
Explanation-For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that a director or a group of
directors, who do not constitute the Board, shall not exercise any of the powers
exercisable by it.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
581S Matters to be transacted at general meeting.
(1) The Board of directors of a Producer Company shall exercise the following powers on
behalf of that company, and it shall do so only by means of resolutions passed at the
annual general meeting of its Members, namely:-
(a) approval of budget and adoption of annual accounts of the Producer Company;
(b) approval of patronage bonus;
(c) issue of bonus shares;
(d) declaration of limited return and decision on the distribution of patronage;
(e) specify the conditions and limits of loans that may be given by the board to any
director ;and
(f) approval of any transaction of the nature as is to be reserved in the articles for
approval by the Members.
581T Liability of directors
(1) When the directors vote for a resolution, or approve by any other means, anything done in
contravention of the provisions of this Act or any other law for the time being in force or
articles, they shall be jointly and severally liable to make good any loss or damage
suffered by the Producer Company.
(2) Without prejudice to the provisions contained in sub-section (1), the Producer Company
shall have the right to recover from its director-
(a) where such director has made any profit as a result of the contravention specified in
sub-section (1), an amount equal to the profit so made;
(b) where the Producer Company incurred a loss or damage as a result of the
contravention specified in sub-section (1), an amount equal to that loss or damage;
(3) The liability imposed under this section shall be in addition to and not in derogation of a
liability imposed on a director under this act or other law for the time being in force.
581U Committee of director
(1) The Board may constitute such number of committees as it may deem fit for the purpose of
assisting the Board in the efficient discharge of its functions: Provided that the Board shall
not delegate any of its powers or assign the powers of the Chief Executive, to any
committee.
(2) A committee constituted under sub-section (1) may, with the approval of the Board, co-
opt such number of persons as it deems fit as members of the committee:
Provided that the Chief Executive appointed under section 581W or a director of the
Producer Company shall be a member of such committee.
(3) Every such committee shall function under the general superintendence, direction and
control of the Board, for such duration, and in such manner as the Board may direct.
(4) The fee and allowances to be paid to the members of the committee shall be such as may
be determined by the Board.
(5) The minutes of each meeting of the committee shall be placed before the Board at its next
meeting.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
581V Meetings of Board and quorum
(1) A meeting of the Board shall be held not less than once in every three months and at least
four such meetings shall be held in every year.
(2) Notice of every meeting of the Board of directors shall be given in writing to every
director for the time being in India, and at his usual address in India to every other
director.
(3) The Chief Executive shall give notice as aforesaid not less than seven days prior to the date
of the meeting of the Board and if he fails to do so, he shall be punishable with fine which
may extend to one thousand rupees:
Provided that a meeting of the Board may be called at the Board thereof shall record
shorter notice and the reasons in writing.
(4) The quorum for a meeting of the Board shall be one-third of the total strength of directors,
subject to a minimum of three.
(5) Save as provided in the articles, directors including the co-opted director; may be paid
such fees and allowances for attendance at he meeting of the Board, as may be decided by
the Member in the general meeting.
581W Chief Executive and his Functions
(1) Every Producer Company shall have a full time Chief Executive, by whatever name called,
to be appointed by the Board from amongst persons other than Members.
(2) The Chief Executive shall be ex-officio director of the Board and such director shall not
retire by rotation.
(3) Save as otherwise provided in articles, the qualifications, experience and the terms and
conditions of service of the Chief Executive shall be such as may be determined by the
Board.
(4) The Chief Executive shall be entrusted with substantial powers of management as the
Board may determine.
(5) Without prejudices to the generality of sub-section (4), the Chief Executive may exercise
the powers and discharge the functions, namely:-
(a) do administrative acts of a routine nature including managing the day-to-day affairs
of the Producer Company.
(b) operate bank accounts or authorise any person, subject to the general or special
approval of the Board in this behalf, to operate the bank account;
(c) make arrangements for safe custody of cash and other assets of the Producer
Company;
(d) sign such documents as may be authorised by the Board, for and on behalf of the
company;
(e) maintain proper books of account; prepare annual accounts and audit thereof; place
the audited accounts before the Board and in the annual general meeting of the
Members;
(f) furnish Members with periodic information to appraise them of the operation and
functions of the Producer Company;
(g) make appointment to posts in accordance with the powers delegated to him by the
Board;
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
(h) assist the Board in the formulation of goals, objectives, strategies, plans and policies;
(i) advise the Board with respect to legal and regulator matters concerning the proposed
and on going activities and take necessary action in respect thereof;
(j) exercise the powers as may be necessary in the ordinary course of business;
(k) discharge such other functions, and exercise such other powers, as may be delegated
by the Board.
(6) The Chief Executive shall manage the affairs of the Producer Company under the general
superintendence, direction and control of the Board and be accountable for the
performance of the Producer Company.
581X Secretary of Producer Company
(1) Every Producer Company having an average annual turnover exceeding five crore rupees
in each of three consecutive financial years shall have a whole-time secretary.
(2) No individuals shall be appointed as whole-time secretary unless he possesses membership
of the Institute of Company Secretaries of India constituted under the Company Act, 1980.
(3) If a Producer Company fails to comply with the provisions of sub-section (1), the company
and every officer of the company who is in default, shall be punishable with fine which
may extend to five hundred rupees for every day during which the default continues:
Provided that in any proceedings against a person in respect of an offence under this sub-
section, it shall be a defence to prove that all reasonable efforts to comply with the
provisions of sub-section (1) were taken the financial position of the company was such
that it was beyond its capacity to engage a whole-time secretary.
581Y Quorum
Unless the articles require a larger number, one-forth of the total membership shall constitute
the quorum at a general meeting.
581Z Voting rights
Save as otherwise provided in sub-sections (1) and (3) section 581D, every Member shall have
one vote and in the case of equality of votes, the Chairman or the person presiding shall have a
casting vote except in the case of election of the Chairman.
Chapter 4. General Meetings
581ZA Annual general meetings
(1) Every Producer Company shall in each year, hold, in addition to any other meetings, a
general meeting, as its annual meeting and shall specify the meeting as such in the notices
calling it, and not more than fifteen months shall elapse between the date of one annual
general meeting of a Producer Company and that of the next:
Provided that the Registrar may, for any special reason, permit extension of the time for
holding any annual general meeting (not being the first annual general meeting) by a
period not exceeding three months.
(2) A Producer Company shall hold its first annual general meeting within a period of ninety
days from the date of its incorporation.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
(3) The Members shall adopt the articles of the Producer Company and appoint directors of its
Board in the annual general meeting.
(4) The notice calling the annual general meeting shall be accompanied by the following
documents, namely:-
(a) the agenda of the annual general meeting;
(b) the minutes of the previous annual general meeting or the extra-ordinary general
meeting;
(c) the names of candidates for election, if any, to the office of director indicating a
statement of qualification in respect of each candidate;
(d) the audited balance-sheet and profit and loss accounts of the Producer Company and
its subsidiary, if any, together with a report of the Board of Directors of such
Company with respect to-
(i) the state of affairs of the Producer Company;
(ii) the amount proposed to be carried to reserves;
(iii) the amount to be paid as limited return on share capital;
(iv) the amount proposed to be disbursed as patronage bonus;
(v) the material changes and commitments, if any, affecting the financial position of
the Producer Company and its subsidiary, which have occurred in between the
date of the date of the annual accounts of the Producer Company to which the
balance-sheet relates and the date of the report of the Board;
(vi) any other matter of importance relating to energy conservation, environmental
protection, expenditure or earnings in foreign exchanges;
(vii) any other matter which is required to be, or may be, specified by the Board;
(e) the next of the draft resolution for appointment of auditors;
(f) the text of any draft resolution proposing amendment to the memorandum or articles
to be considered at the general meeting, along with the recommendations of the
Board.
(4) The Board of directors shall, on the requisition made in writing, duly signed and setting
out the matters for the consideration, made by one-third of the Members entitled to vote in
any general meeting, proceed to call an extraordinary general meeting in accordance with
the provision contained in sections 169 to 186 of this Act.
(5) Every annual general meeting shall be called, for a time during business hours, on a day
that is not public holiday and shall be held at the registered office of the Producer
Company or at some other place within the city, town or village in which the registered
office of the Company is situate.
(6) A general meeting of the Producer Company shall be called by giving not less than
fourteen days prior notice in writing.
(7) The notice of the general meeting indicating the date, time and place of the meeting shall
be sent to every Member and auditor of the Producer Company.
(8) Unless the articles of the Producer Company provide for a large number, one-fourth of the
total number of members of the Producer Company shall be the quorum for its annual
general meeting.
(9) The proceedings of every annual general meeting along with the Directors‘ Report, the
audited balance-sheet and the profit and loss account shall be filed with the Registrar
within sixty days of the date on which the annual general meeting is held, with an annual
return along with the filing fees as applicable under the Act.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
(10) In the case where a Producer Company is formed by Producer institutions, such
institutions shall be represented in the general body through the Chairman or the Chief
Executive there of who shall be competent to act on its behalf:
Provided that a Producer institution shall not be represented if such institution makes a
default or failure referred to in clauses (d) to (f) of sub-section (1) of section 581Q.
Chapter 5 Share Capital and Members Rights
581ZBShare capital
(1) The share capital of Producer Company shall consist of equity shares only.
(2) The shares held by a Member in a Producer Company shall as far as may be, be in
proportion to the patronage of that company.
581ZC Special user rights
(1) The producers, who are active Members may, if so provided In the articles, have special
rights and the Producer Company may issue appropriate instruments to them in respect of
such special rights.
(2) The instruments of the Producer Company issued under sub-section (1) shall, after
obtaining approval of the Board in that behalf, be transferable to any other active Member
of that Producer Company.
Explanation.- For the purposes of this section, the expression ―special right‖ means any
right relating to supply to additional produce by the active Member or any other right
relating to his produce which may be conferred upon him by the Board.
581ZD Transferability of shares and attendant rights
(1) Save as otherwise provided in sub-section (2) to (4), the shares of a Member of Producer
Company shall not be transferable.
(2) A Member of a Producer Company may, after obtaining the previous approval of the
Board, transfer the whole or part of his shares along with any special rights, to an active
Member at par value.
(3) Every Member shall, within three months of his becoming a Member in the Producer
Company, nominate, in the manner specified in articles, a person to whom his shares in
the Producer Company shall vest in the event of his death.
(4) The nominee shall, on the death of the Member, become entitled to all the rights in the
shares of the Producer Company and the Board of that Company shall transfer the shares
of the deceased Member to his nominee: Provided that in a case where such nominee is
not a producer, the Board shall direct the surrender of shares together with special rights,
if any, to the Producer Company at par value or such other value as may be determined by
the Board.
(5) Where the Board of a Producer Company is satisfied that-
(a) any Member has ceased to be a primary producer; or
(b) any Member has failed to retain his qualifications to be a Member as specified in
articles, the Board shall direct the surrender of shares together with special rights, if
any, to the Producer Company at par value or such other value as may be determined
by the Board: Provided that the Board shall not direct such surrender of shares unless
the member has been served with a written notice and given an opportunity of being
heard.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
Chapter 6. Finance, Accounts and Audit
581ZE Books of account
(1) Every Producer Company shall keep at its registered office proper books of account with
respect to-
(a) all sums of money received and expended by the Producer Company and matters in
respect of which the receipts and expenditure take place;
(b) all sales and purchase of goods by the Producer Company;
(c) the instruments of liability executed by or on behalf of the Producer Company;
(d) the assets and liabilities of the Producer Company;
(e) in case of a Producer Company engaged in production, processing and
manufacturing, the particulars relating to utilisation of materials or labour or other
items of costs.
(2) The balance-sheet and profit and loss accounts of the Producer Company shall be
prepared, as far as may be, in accordance with the provision contained in section 211.
581ZF Internal Audit
Every Producer Company shall have internal audit of its accounts carried out, at such interval
and in such manner as may be specified in articles, by a chartered accountants as defined in
clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the institute of Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
581ZGDuties of Auditor under this part
Without prejudices to the provisions contained in section 227, the auditor shall report on the
following additional matters relating to the Producer Company, namely:-
(a) the amount of debts due along with particulars or bad debts if any;
(b) the verification of cash balance and securities;
(c) the details of assets and liabilities;
(d) all transactions which appear to be contrary to the provisions of this part;
(e) the loans given by the Producer Company to the directors;
(f) the donations or subscriptions given by the Producer Company;
(g) any other matter as may be considered necessary by the auditor.
581ZH Donations or subscription by Produce Company
A Producer Company may, by special resolution, make donation or subscription to any
institution or individual for the purpose of –
(a) promoting the social and economic welfare of Producer Members or producer or
general public; or
(b) promoting the mutual assistance principles: Provided that the aggregate amount of all
such donation and subscription in any financial year shall not exceed three percent. Of
the net profit of the Producer Company in the financial year immediately preceding
the financial year in which the donation or subscription was made:
Provided further that no Producer Company shall make directly or indirectly to any political
party or for any political purpose to any person any contribution or subscription or make
available any facilities including personnel or material.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
581ZI General and other reserves
(1) Every Producer Company shall maintain a general reserve in every financial year, in
addition to any reserve maintained by it as may be specified in articles.
(2) In case where the Producer Company does not have sufficient funds in any financial
year for transfer to maintain the reserves as may be specified in articles, the contribution
to the reserve shall be shared amongst the Members in proportion to their patronage in
the business of that company in that year.
581ZJ Issue of bonus shares
Any Producer Company may, upon recommendation of the Board and passing resolution in
the general meeting, issue bonus shares by capitalisation of amounts from general reserves
referred to in section 581ZI in proportion to the shares held by the Members on the date of
the issue of such shares.
Chapter 7. Loans to Members and Investments
581ZK Loan, etc to Members
The Board may, subject to the provision made in articles, provide financial assistance to the
Members of the Producer Company by way of –
(a) credit facility, to any Member, in connection with the business of the Producer
Company, for a period not exceeding six months;
(b) Loan and advances, against security specified in articles to any Member, repayable
within a period exceeding three months but not exceeding seven years from the date of
the disbursement of such loan or advances: Provided that any loan or advance to any
director or his relative shall be granted only after the approval by the Members in the
general meeting.
581ZL Investment in other companies. formation of subsidiaries etc
(1) The general reserves of any Producer Company shall be invested to secure the highest
returns available from approved securities, fixed deposits, units, bonds issued by the
Government or cooperative or scheduled bank or in such other mode as may be
prescribed.
(2) Any Producer Company may, for promotion of its objectives acquire the shares of
another Producer Company.
(3) Any Producer Company may subscribe to the share capital of, or enter into any
agreement or other arrangement, whether by way of formation of its subsidiary
company, joint venture or in any other manner with any body corporate, for the purpose
of promoting the objects of the Producer Company by special resolution in this behalf.
(4) Any Producer Company, either by itself or together with its subsidiaries, any invest, by
way of subscription, purchase or otherwise, shares in any other company, other then a
Producer Company, specified under sub-section (2), or subscription of capital under
sub-section (3), for an amount not exceeding thirty percent, of the aggregate of its paid-
up capital and free reserves: Provided that a Producer Company may by special
resolution passed in its general meeting and with prior approval of the Central
Government, invest in excess of the limits specified in this section.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
(5) All investments by a Producer Company may be made if such investments are
consistent with the objects of the Producer Company.
(6) The Board of a Producer Company may, with the previous approval of Member by a
special resolution, dispose of any of its investments referred to in sub-section (3) and (4).
(7) Every Producer Company shall maintain a register containing particulars of all the
investments, showing the names of the companies in which shares have been acquired,
number and value of shares; the date of acquisition; and the manner and price at which
any of the shares have been subsequently disposed of.
(8) The register referred to in sub-section (7) shall be kept at the registered office of the
Producer Company and the same shall be open to inspection by any Member who take
extracts therefrom.
Chapter 8. Penalties
581ZM Penalty for contravention
(1) If any person, other than a Producer Company registered under this part, carries on
business under any name which contains the words ―Producer Company Limited ― he
shall be punishable with fine which may extend to ten thousand rupees for every day
during which such name has been used by him.
(2) If any director or an officer of a Producer Company, who with fully fails to furnish any
information relating to the affairs of the Producer Company required by a Member or a
person duly authorised in this behalf, he shall be liable to imprisonment for a return
which extend to six months and with fine equivalent to five per cent of the turnover of
that company during preceding financial year.
(3) If a director or officer of a Producer Company-
(a) makes a default in handing over the custody of books of account and other
documents or property in his custody to the Producer Company of which he is a
director or officer; or
(b) fails to convene annual general meeting or other general meetings, he shall be
punishable with fine which may extend to one lakh rupees, and in the case of a
continuing default or failure, with an additional fine which may extend to ten
thousand rupees for every day during which such default or failure continues.
Chapter 9. Amalgamation, Merger or Division
581ZN Amalgamation, merger or division etc to form new Producer Companies
(1) A Producer Company may, by a resolution passed at its general meeting,-
(a) decide to transfer its assets and liabilities, in whole or in part, to any other Producer
Company, which agrees to such transfer by a resolution passed at its general
meeting, for any of the objects specified in section 581B.
(b) divide itself into two or more new Producer Companies.
(2) Any two or more Producer Companies may, by a resolution passed at any general or
special meetings of its Members, decide to-
(a) amalgamate and form a new Producer Company; or
(b) merge one Producer Company (hereafter referred to as ―merging company‖) with
another Producer Company (hereafter referred to as ―merging company‖)
(3) Every resolution of Producer Company under this section shall be passed at its general
meeting by a majority of total Members, with right of vote not less than two-thirds of its
Members present and voting and such resolution shall contain all particulars of the
transfer of assets and liabilities, or division, amalgamation, or merger, as the case may
be.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
(4) Before passing a resolution under this section, the Producer Company shall give notice
thereof in writing together with a copy of the proposed resolution to all the Members
and creditors who may their consent.
(5) Notwithstanding anything contained in articles or in any contract to the contrary, any
Member, or any creditor not consenting to the resolution shall, during the period of one
month of the date of service of the notice on him, have the option,-
(a) in the case of any such Member, to transfer his shares with the approval of the
Board to any active Member thereby ceasing to continue as a Member of that
company; or
(b) in the case of a creditor, to withdraw his deposit or loan or advance, as the case may
be.
(6) Any Member or creditors, who does not exercise his option within the period specified
in sub-section (5), shall be deemed to have consented to the resolution.
(7) A resolution passed by a Producer Company under this section shall not take effect until
the expiry of one month or until the assent thereto of all the Members and creditors has
been obtained, whichever is earlier.
(8) The resolution referred to in this section shall provide for-
(a) the regulation of conduct of the Producer Company‘s affairs in the future;
(b) the purchase of shares or interest of any Member of the Producer Company by
other Members or the Producer Company;
(c) in the case of purchase of shares of the Producer Company by another Producer
Company, the consequent reduction of its share capital;
(d) termination, setting aside or modification of any agreement, however arrived
between the company on the one hand and the directors, secretaries and manager on
the other hand, apart from such terms and conditions as may, in the option of the
majority of shareholders, be just and equitable in the circumstances of the case;
(e) termination, setting aside or modification of any agreement between the Producer
Company and any person not referred to in clause (d): Provided that no such
agreement shall be terminated, set aside or modified except after giving due notice
to the party concerned: Provided further that no such agreement shall be modified
except after obtaining the consent of the party concerned;
(f) the setting aside of any transfer, delivery of goods, payment, execution or other act
relating to property, made or done by or against the Producer Company within three
months before the date of passing of the resolution, which would if made or done
against any individual, be deemed in his insolvency to be a fraudulent preference;
(g) the transfer to the merged company of the whole or any part of the undertaking,
property or liability of the Producer Company
(h) the allotment or appropriation by the merged company of any shares, debentures,
policies, or other like interests in the merged Company;
(i) the continuation by or against the merged company of any legal proceedings
pending by or against any Producer Company;
(j) the dissolution, without winding-up, of any Producer Company;
(k) the provision to be made for the Members or creditors who make dissent;
(l) the taxes if any, to be paid by the Producer Company;
(m) such incidental, consequential and supplemental matters as are necessary to secure
that the division, amalgamation or merger shall be fully and effectively carried out.
(9) When a resolution passed by a Producer Company under this section takes effect, the
resolution shall be a sufficient conveyance to vest the assets and liabilities in the
transferee.
(10) The Producer Company shall make arrangement for meeting in full or otherwise
satisfying all claims of the Members and creditors who exercise the option, within the
period specified in the sub-section (4), not to continue as the Member or creditor, as the
case may be.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
(11) Where the whole of the assets and liabilities of a Producer Company are transferred to
another Producer Company in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (9), or
where there is merger under sub-section (2) the registration of the first mentioned
Company or the merging company, as the case may be, shall stand cancelled and that
Company shall be deemed to have been dissolved and shall cease to exist forth with as
corporate body.
(12) Where two or more Producer Companies are amalgamated into a new Producer
Company in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (2) and the Producer
Company so formed is duly registered by the Registrar, the registration of each of the
amalgamating companies shall stand cancelled forthwith on such registration and each
of the Companies shall thereupon cease to exist as a corporate body.
(13) Where a Producer Company divides itself into two or more Producer Companies in
accordance with the provisions of clause (b) of sub-section (1) and the new Producer
Companies are registered in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (8), the
registration of erstwhile Producer Company shall stand cancelled forthwith and that
Company shall be deemed to have been dissolved and cease to exist as a corporate body.
(14) The amalgamation, merger or division of companies under the foregoing sub-section shall
not in any manner whatsoever affect the pre-existing rights or obligations and any legal
proceedings that might have been continued or commenced by or against any erstwhile
company before the amalgamation, merger or division, may be continued or
commenced by, or against, the concerned resulting company, or merged company, as
the case may be.
(15) The Registrar shall strike off the names of every Producer Company deemed to have
been dissolved under sub-sections (11) to (14)
(16) Any member or creditor or employee aggrieved by the transfer of assets, division,
amalgamation or merger may, with thirty days of the passing of the resolution, prefer an
appeal to High Court.
(17) The High Court shall, after giving a reasonable opportunity to the person concerned,
pass such orders thereon as it may deem fit.
(18) Where an appeal has been filed under sub-section (16), the transfer of assets, division,
amalgamation or merger of the Producer Company shall be subject to the decision of the
High Court.
Chapter 10. Resolution of Disputes
581ZO Disputes
(1) Where any dispute relating to the formation, management or business of a Producer
Company arises-
(a) amongst Members, former Members or persons claiming to be Members or
nominees of deceased Members; or
(b) between a Member, former Member or a person claiming to be a Member, or
nominee of deceased Member and the Producer Company, its Board of directors,
office-bearers, or liquidator, past or present; or
(c) between the Producer Company or its Board, and any director, office-bearer or any
former director, or nominee, heir or legal representative of any deceased director of
the Producer Company, such dispute shall be settled by conciliation or by arbitration
as provided under the arbitration and conciliation Act, 1996 as if the parties of the
dispute have consented in writing for determination of such disputes by
conciliation or by arbitration and the provisions of the said Act shall apply
accordingly.
Explanation:- For the purpose of this section, a dispute shall include-
(a) a claim for any debt or other amount due;
(b) a claim surety against the principal debtor, where the Producer Company has
recovered from the surety amount in respect of any debtor or other amount due
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
to it from the principal debtor as a result of the default of the principle debtor
whether such debt of amount due be admitted or not;
(c) a claim by Producer Company against a Member for failure to supply produce
as required of him.
(d) A claim by a Member against the Producer Company for not taking goods
supplied by him.
(2) If any question arises whether the dispute relates to formation, management or business
of the Producer Company, the question shall be referred to the arbitrator, whose
decision thereon shall be final.
Chapter 11. Miscellaneous Provisions
581ZP Strike off name of Producer Company
(1) Where a Producer Company fails to commence business within one year of its
registration or ceases to transact business with the Members or if the Registrar is
satisfied, after making such inquiry as he thinks fit, that the Producer Company is no
longer carrying on any of its objects specified in section 581B, he shall make an order
striking off the name of the Producer Company, which shall thereupon cease to exist
forthwith: Provided that no such order canceling the registration as aforesaid shall be
passed until a notice to show cause has been given by the Registrar to the Producer
Company with a copy to all its directors on the proposed action and reasonable
opportunity to represent its case has been given.
(2) Where the Registrar has reasonable cause to believe that a Producer Company is not
maintaining any of the mutual assistance principles specified, he shall strike its name off
the register in accordance with the provisions contained in section 560 of this Act.
(3) Any member of a Producer Company, who is aggrieved by an order made under sub-
section (1), may appeal to the company Law Board within sixty days of the order.
(4) Where an appeal is filed under sub-section (3), the order striking off the name shall not
take effect until the appeal is disposed of.
581ZQ Provisions of this Part to override other laws
The provision of this Part shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith
contained in this Act or any other law for the time being in force or any instrument having
effect by virtue of any such law; but the provisions of any such Act or law or instrument in
so far as the same are not varied by, or are inconsistent with, the provisions of this Part shall
apply to the Producer Company.
581ZR Application of provisions relating to private companies
All the limitations, restrictions and provisions Act, other than those specified in this Part,
applicable to a private company, shall as far as may be, apply to a Producer Company, as if
it is a private limited company under this Act in so far as they are not in conflict with the
provisions of this part.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
Chapter 12. Reconversion of Producer Company to Inter-State Cooperative Society
581ZS Reconversion of Producer Company to inter-state cooperative society
(1) Any Producer Company, being an erstwhile inter-state cooperative society, formed and
registered under this Part, may make an application-
(a) after passing a resolution in the general meeting by not less than two-third of its
Members present and voting; or
(b) on request by its creditors representing three-fourth value of its total creditors.
to the High Court for its re-conversion to the inter-State cooperative society.
(2) The High Court shall, on the application made under sub-section (1), direct holding
meeting of its Members or such creditors, as the case may be, to be conducted in such
manner as it may direct.
(3) If a majority in number representing three-fourth in value of the creditors, or Members,
as the case may be, presented and voting in person at the meeting conducted in
pursuance of the directions of the High court under sub-section (2), agree for re-
conversion, if sanctioned by the High Court, be binding on all the Members and all the
creditors, as the case may be, and also on the company which is being converted:
provided that no order sanctioning re-conversion shall be made by the Court unless the
Court is satisfied that the company or any other person by whom an application has
been made under sub-section (1) has disclosed to the Court, by affidavit or otherwise, all
material facts relating to the company, such as the latest financial position of the
company, the latest auditor‘s report on the accounts of the company, the tendency of any
investigation proceedings in relation to the company under section 235 to 251, and the
like.
(4) An order made by the Court under sub-section (3) shall have no effect until a certified
copy of the order has been filed with the Registrar.
(5) A copy of every such order shall be annexed to every copy of the memorandum of the
company issued after the certified copy of the order has been filed as aforesaid, or in the
case of a company not having a memorandum, to every copy so issued of the instrument
constituting or defining the constitution of the company.
(6) If default is made in complying with sub-section (4), the company, and every officer of
the company who is in default, shall be punishable with fine which may extend to one
hundred rupees, for each copy in respect of which default it is made.
(7) The Court may, at any time after an application has made to it under this section, stay the
commencement or continuation of any suit or proceeding against the company on such
terms as the Court thinks fit, until the application is finally disposed of.
(8) Every Producer Company which has been sanctioned re-conversion by the High Court,
shall make an application, under the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 1984 or any
other law for the time being in force for its registration as multi-State cooperative
society or cooperative society, as the case may be, within six months of sanction by the
High Court and file a report there of the High Court and the Registrar of companies and
to the Registrar of the cooperative societies under which it has been registered as a
multi-State cooperative society or cooperative society, as the case may be.
URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE: TOWARDS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF LOW INCOME PRODUCERS‘ ORGANIZATIONS:
HYDERABAD – CITY CASE STUDY IWMI-ALCI
581ZT Power to modify Act in its application to Producer Companies
(1) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official gazette, direct that any of
the provisions of this Act (other than those contained in this Part) specified in the said
notification-
(a) shall not apply to the Producer Companies or any class or category thereof; or
(b) Shall apply to the Producer Companies or any class or category thereof with such
exception or adaptation as may be specified in the notification.
(2) A copy of every notification proposed to be issued under sub-section (1), shall be laid in
draft before each House of Parliament, while it is session, for a total period of thirty
days which may be comprised in one session or in two or more successive sessions, and
if, before the expiry of the session immediately following the session or the successive
session aforesaid both Houses agree in disapproving the issue of the notification or both
Houses agree in making any modification in the notification, the notification shall not
be issued or, as the case may be, shall be issued only in such modified form as may be
agreed upon by both the Houses.