1
RESEARCH ARTICLE 1 2
The reverse-transcriptase/RNA-maturase protein MatR is required for the 3 splicing of various group II introns in Brassicaceae mitochondria 4
5 Laure D. Sultan1,+, Daria Mileshina2,+, Felix Grewe3,4 , Katarzyna Rolle5, Sivan Abudraham1, Paweł 6 Głodowicz5, Adnan Khan Niazi2, Ido Keren1, Sofia Shevtsov1, Liron Klipcan6,7, Jan Barciszewski5, 7 Jeffrey P. Mower3, André Dietrich2, Oren Ostersetzer-Biran1,* 8
9 1 Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, The Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, 10 The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Givat-Ram, Jerusalem 91904, Israel.11 2 Institut de Biologie Moléculaire des Plantes, CNRS and Université de Strasbourg, 12 rue du Général 12 Zimmer, 67084 Strasbourg, France. 13 3 Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA 14 4 Current Address: Integrative Research Center, The Field Museum, 1400 S Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, 15 IL 60605, USA 16 5 Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Noskowskiego 12/14, 61-704 Poznan, 17 Poland 18 6 Department of Structural Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel 19 7 Current Address: Institute of Plant Sciences, the Gilat Research Center, Agricultural Research 20 Organization (ARO), Rural Delivery Negev, Israel. 21 + These authors contributed equally to this work.22 * Corresponding Author: [email protected]
24 Short title: MatR role in mitochondria group II intron splicing 25
One-sentence summary: MatR, a highly conserved, essential mitochondrial protein, functions in the processing and maturation of various pre-RNAs in plant mitochondria, as revealed by in vivo analyses.
The author responsible for the distribution of materials integral to the findings of this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantcell.org) is: Oren Ostersetzer-Biran ([email protected].).
26 ABSTRACT 27 Group II introns are large catalytic RNAs that are ancestrally related to nuclear spliceosomal 28 introns. Sequences corresponding to group II RNAs are found in many prokaryotes and are 29 particularly prevalent within plants organellar genomes. Proteins encoded within the introns 30 themselves (maturases) facilitate the splicing of their own host pre-RNAs. Mitochondrial introns 31 in plants have diverged considerably in sequence and have lost their maturases. In angiosperms, 32 only a single maturase has been retained in the mitochondrial DNA: the matR gene found within 33 NADH dehydrogenase 1 (nad1) intron 4. Its conservation across land plants and RNA editing 34 events, which restore conserved amino acids, indicates that matR encodes a functional protein. 35 However, the biological role of MatR remains unclear. Here, we performed an in vivo 36 investigation of the roles of MatR in Brassicaceae. Directed-knockdown of matR expression via 37 synthetically designed ribozymes altered the processing of various introns, including nad1 i4. 38 Pull-down experiments further indicated that MatR is associated with nad1 i4 and several other 39 intron-containing pre-mRNAs. MatR may thus represent an intermediate link in the gradual 40 evolutionary transition from the intron-specific maturases in bacteria into their versatile 41
Plant Cell Advance Publication. Published on October 19, 2016, doi:10.1105/tpc.16.00398
©2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All Rights Reserved
2
spliceosomal descendants in the nucleus. The similarity between maturases and the core 42 spliceosomal Prp8 protein further support this intriguing theory. 43 44
INTRODUCTION 45
Mitochondria play central roles in cellular energy production and metabolism. As progenies from 46
a free-living prokaryotic symbiont, mitochondria contain their own genomes (mtDNAs), 47
ribosomes and proteins. While the mtDNAs in animal cells are typically small (16–19 kbp), 48
encoding 37 or fewer tightly packed genes, the mtDNAs in plants are notably larger (100–11,300 49
kbp) and variable in their structure (Kubo and Newton, 2008; Maréchal and Brisson, 2010; 50
Arrieta-Montiel and Mackenzie, 2011; Knoop, 2012; Sloan et al., 2012; Small, 2013; Gualberto 51
et al., 2014). In angiosperms, the mtDNAs contain about 60 identifiable genes encoding tRNAs, 52
rRNAs, ribosomal proteins and various subunits of the energy transduction pathway, but they 53
also harbor numerous open reading frames (ORFs), many of which are not conserved between 54
different species and whose functions are currently unknown (reviewed in e.g. (Mower et al., 55
2012). Our work focuses on the analysis of a maturase-related (MatR) ORF, which is encoded 56
within the fourth intron in NADH dehydrogenase 1 (nad1) (Wahleithner et al., 1990). 57
The expression of the mitochondrial genomes in plants is complex, particularly at the 58
post-transcriptional level (see e.g. (Liere et al., 2011; Small et al., 2013; Hammani and Giege, 59
2014). To become functional, the primary organellar transcripts undergo extensive processing 60
events, including RNA editing (commonly C-to-U conversions) and the splicing of numerous 61
introns that reside within the coding regions of many essential genes (Bonen, 2008; Brown et al., 62
2014; Schmitz-Linneweber et al., 2015). These essential processing steps are regulated by 63
various protein cofactors, which may link the respiratory-mediated functions with environmental 64
or developmental signals (see e.g. (Li-Pook-Than et al., 2004; Dalby and Bonen, 2013). Several 65
of the factors required for mitochondrial introns splicing have been identified, but there are 66
certainly many more to be discovered (Brown et al., 2014; Schmitz-Linneweber et al., 2015). 67
With the exception of the horizontally acquired group I intron in the cox1 (cytochrome c 68
oxidase subunit 1) gene of some angiosperms (Vaughn et al., 1995; Sanchez-Puerta et al., 2008), 69
all other mitochondrial introns in angiosperms are classified as group II-type (Bonen, 2008). 70
Canonical introns belonging to this class are self-catalytic RNAs (i.e. ribozymes) and mobile 71
genetic elements, which are defined by a highly conserved secondary structure of six stem-loop 72
3
domains (DI - DVI) radiating from a central RNA core (Michel et al., 1989; Ferat and Michel, 73
1993). Based on their structural features and splicing chemistry (i.e. two consecutive 74
transesterification steps, with a bulged A from the intron acting as the initiating nucleophile), 75
group II introns are proposed to be the progenitors of spliceosomal RNAs (reviewed in e.g. 76
(Cech, 1986). Although some model group II introns are able to catalyze their own excision in 77
vitro, independently of proteins (Michel et al., 1989; Ferat and Michel, 1993; Lambowitz and 78
Belfort, 1993; Saldanha et al., 1993; Michel and Ferat, 1995), the conditions for self-splicing are 79
generally non-physiological (i.e. high temperatures and salt conditions), and for their efficient 80
splicing in vivo, the group II-encoding pre-RNAs depend upon interactions with various 81
proteinaceous cofactors (Lambowitz and Belfort, 2015). In bacteria and yeast mitochondria, 82
proteins that function in the splicing of group II introns typically involve maturases (MATs), 83
which are encoded within the fourth stem-loop domain (DIV) of the introns themselves. The 84
MATs were shown to bind with high affinity and specificity to their own cognate intron-RNAs 85
and are postulated to facilitate intron splicing by assisting the folding of these highly structured 86
RNAs into their catalytically active forms under physiological conditions (Cousineau et al., 87
1998; Wank et al., 1999; Singh et al., 2002; Noah and Lambowitz, 2003; Cui et al., 2004; 88
Blocker et al., 2005; Huang et al., 2005; Ostersetzer et al., 2005). 89
Group II MATs contain several conserved motifs that are required for both splicing and 90
intron mobility (Mohr et al., 1993; Michel and Ferat, 1995; Wank et al., 1999; Matsuura et al., 91
2001; Aizawa et al., 2003; Cui et al., 2004; Lambowitz and Zimmerly, 2011; Lambowitz and 92
Belfort, 2015; Zimmerly and Semper, 2015). These include a region with sequence similarity to 93
retroviral-type reverse transcriptases (i.e. the RT domain), with conserved sequence blocks that 94
are present in the fingers and palm regions of retroviral RTs, and a conserved sequence motif 95
similar to the thumb domain of retroviral RTs (also denoted as domain X), which is associated 96
with RNA binding and splicing (Mohr et al., 1993). In addition to the RT domain, these proteins 97
may harbor C-terminal DNA binding (D) and endonuclease (En) domains that are found in some, 98
but not all, of the MATs. 99
Phylogenetic studies show that the organellar introns in plants have all evolved from 100
MAT-containing introns (Bonen and Vogel, 2001; Toor et al., 2001; Zimmerly et al., 2001; 101
Ahlert et al., 2006; Lambowitz and Belfort, 2015; Zimmerly and Semper, 2015). Yet, only a 102
single mat-related gene has been retained in each of the organelles in angiosperms, namely, matK 103
4
found in the trnK intron in the plastids (Mohr et al., 1993; Hausner et al., 2006) and a 104
mitochondrial maturase-related ORF (matR), encoded within the fourth intron of the nad1 gene 105
(i.e. nad1 i4), encoding subunit 1 of respiratory complex I (Wahleithner et al., 1990). Both MatK 106
and MatR are well conserved between different monocot and dicot species, and are thus expected 107
to retain similar functions in all angiosperms. 108
Several lines of evidence suggest that MatK is involved in the splicing of plastidial group 109
II introns in plants (Zoschke et al., 2009; Schmitz-Linneweber et al., 2015). Plants with defective 110
plastidial ribosomes are unable to splice the subclass group IIA introns in the chloroplast 111
(Jenkins et al., 1997). Also, several parasitic plants that lack matK have also lost the plastid-112
encoded group IIA introns from their plastid DNAs (Funk et al., 2007; Wicke et al., 2013), while 113
plants that contain matK as a stand-alone ORF have retained some subgroup IIA introns in their 114
reduced plastid genomes (Wolfe et al., 1992; Ems et al., 1995). Recently, using transplastomic 115
lines in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), (Zoschke et al., 2010) and his colleagues showed that 116
MatK is associated in vivo with many of the subgroup IIA introns in the chloroplasts (Zoschke et 117
al., 2010). These data strongly support the notion that MatK plays a prominent role in plastid 118
RNA metabolism. 119
Likewise, the roles of MatR are also expected to be essential for mitochondrial biogenesis 120
in plants. MatR is closely related to maturases encoded by group II introns in bacteria 121
(Wahleithner et al., 1990) and has been retained as a conserved ORF in the mtDNAs in nearly all 122
angiosperms (Adams et al., 2002). Different RNA analyses show that the matR transcripts 123
undergo several RNA-editing events, which restore conserved amino acids (Thomson et al., 124
1994; Begu et al., 1998). Yet, as a transformation system has not been established for 125
mitochondria in plants, no loss- or gain-of-function studies are currently available to test this 126
theory. In this report, we use Arabidopsis thaliana (Col-0) and cauliflower (Brassica oleracea 127
var. botrytis), two key members of the Brassicaceae family, to study the functions of MatR in 128
plants. While Arabidopsis serves as a prime model system for plant molecular genetics, 129
cauliflower is employed for biochemical analysis of plant mitochondrial RNA metabolism 130
(Neuwirt et al., 2005). We present several lines of evidence indicating that the matR locus 131
encodes a mitochondrial protein, which is associated with various pre-RNAs in Brassicales. We 132
further implemented an innovative system for genetic manipulation of mitochondrial gene 133
expression in Arabidopsis using synthetic ribozymes (Val et al., 2011) and show that a reduction 134
5
in MatR expression affects the processing of a number of group II introns in Arabidopsis 135
mitochondria. 136
137
RESULTS 138
matR gene structure in Brassicales 139
In Brassicaceae, as in many plant species, the nad1 gene is fragmented into five exons in mtDNA 140
(see e.g. (Grewe et al., 2014). These are typically expressed as three individual transcription 141
units, which are fragmented in two of the introns (i.e. nad1 i1 and nad1 i3). For its maturation, 142
nad1 undergoes the splicing of two trans-spliced pre-RNAs (i.e. nad1 i1 and nad1 i3) and the 143
excision of two introns (nad1 i2 and nad1 i4) that are found in a classical cis configuration. The 144
fourth intron in nad1 (i.e. nad1 i4) encodes a well conserved maturase-related reading frame, 145
denoted as MatR (Wahleithner et al., 1990; Chapdelaine and Bonen, 1991; Thomson et al., 146
1994). Figure 1A shows a schematic secondary structure model of nad1 i4 and its cognate 147
maturase-related (matR) gene, in Arabidopsis. Notably, sequencing data indicate that while nad1 148
i4 is found in a standard ‘cis’ configuration in Brassicales (Grewe et al., 2014), in some plant 149
species, such as petunia, tobacco, wheat and rice, nad1 i4 is fragmented in DIV either upstream 150
or downstream of the matR reading frame (Figure 1B; and (Malek et al., 1997; Bonen, 2008). 151
The nature of the complex biochemical interactions between group II introns and their 152
protein partners is under investigation. The best characterized maturase to-date is LtrA maturase 153
from the bacterium Lactococcus lactis, which binds with high affinity and specificity to its host 154
intron, the Ll.LtrB pre-RNA. The LtrB group II intron is able to self-splice in the presence of 155
high Mg2+ concentrations in vitro, but its splicing at physiological conditions in vivo requires the 156
LtrA protein (Saldanha et al., 1999). The association of LtrA with the LtrB intron is facilitated 157
primarily through its association with regions found within DIV of the intron (Wank et al., 158
1999). The binding of LtrA with regions in LtrB intron DIV may enable its association with core 159
intron elements, promoting short- and long-range tertiary RNA base interactions that are 160
necessary for RNA folding and catalysis (Matsuura et al., 2001; Noah and Lambowitz, 2003). 161
Based on the PHYRE (Kelley and Sternberg, 2009) and ROBETTA (Kim et al., 2004) 162
servers, the MatR protein in Brassicales shares similarity with the reverse transcriptase (RT) 163
domains of various proteins, including telomerases (c3du6A; confidence 99.6), HIV-1 reverse-164
transcriptases (c1rthA; confidence 97.3) and DNA/RNA polymerases (d1ztwa1; confidence 165
6
96.2). The RT domains of model group II-encoded MATs contain several subdomains, which are 166
required for RNA recognition and intron splicing (see e.g. (Lambowitz and Belfort, 2015; 167
Zimmerly and Semper, 2015; Piccirilli and Staley, 2016; Qu et al., 2016; Zhao and Pyle, 2016). 168
These include the finger and palm subdomains of a polymerase and the less conserved domain X 169
that is analogous to a polymerase thumb domain. In addition, model maturases also contain in 170
the RT region an N-terminal subdomain (NTD), which in the case of the bacterial LtrA protein is 171
required for the binding of the maturase with regions in DIV of its host ltrB intron RNA that 172
include the LtrA-ORF’s Shine-Dalgarno site (Qu et al., 2016). This suggests that canonical 173
MATs may autoregulate their own expression in vivo through binding to their own ribosome 174
binding sites (see e.g. (Matsuura et al., 2001; Singh et al., 2002). 175
Analysis of conserved domains, implemented in the NCBI server (Marchler-Bauer et al., 176
2015), showed that the MatR-ORF in Arabidopsis harbors only some parts of the consensus RT 177
region, i.e. sequence blocks RT 3 to 7 of the finger-palm and an intact thumb (X) motif, but does 178
not contain an N-terminus NTD subdomain (Figure 2). Like the nucleus-encoded type I 179
maturases (Mohr and Lambowitz, 2003; Keren et al., 2009), MatR also lacks the C-terminal 180
DNA binding and endonuclease (D/En) domains. It is therefore anticipated that the intron 181
mobility functions associated with some canonical group II intron-encoded MATs has been lost, 182
while splicing activity is retained for mitochondrial MatR in plants (see e.g. (Brown et al., 2014; 183
Schmitz-Linneweber et al., 2015). Interestingly, MatR harbors two large insertions in the finger-184
palm region, between the conserved sequence blocks RT-4 and RT-5 (amino acids 153-317) and 185
between the RT-7 and the thumb motif (amino acids 385-533), which may correspond to 186
additional RT subdomains, which are unique to the MatR protein (Figure 2, labeled by dotted 187
boxes, and Supplemental Figure 1). 188
189
RNA-seq data indicate that the matR gene is transcribed as part of a polycistronic unit in 190
Brassicales mtDNAs 191
To analyze the expression of MatR in Brassicaceae, we used different RNA methodologies, i.e. 192
RNA-seq (high-throughput RNA sequencing), RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA ends) and 193
RT-PCR analyses, with purified mitochondrial RNAs (mt-RNAs) preparations. For this purpose, 194
we used mitochondria isolated from cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis) inflorescences, 195
which allows the purification of large quantities of highly enriched organellar preparations from 196
7
a plant that is also closely related to Arabidopsis (Neuwirt et al., 2005; Keren et al., 2009). 197
Previously, we established the genome sequence of Brassica oleracea mitochondria (Grewe et 198
al., 2014). Comparisons of the mtDNA sequences of Arabidopsis and cauliflower show that nad1 199
i4, and its cognate matR reading frame, are nearly identical between the two plant species 200
(Supplemental Figure 1). 201
RNA-seq of total cauliflower mt-RNA suggested that matR is found on a large 202
polycistronic transcript unit containing the nad1 i4 sequence together with nad1 exons 4 and 5, a 203
(pseudo) gene-fragment of nad5 (i.e. ψnad5-2), and possibly also several ORFs of unknown 204
functions (i.e. orf159, orf161 and orf287) (Supplemental Figure 2). RNA-seq also indicated the 205
presence of U bases at many positions in the RNA sequence where the DNA sequence has C 206
bases (Supplemental Figure 2, labeled in green). These likely correspond to RNA editing sites, 207
which seem to be particularly prevalent in the coding regions of nad1 exons 4 and 5, but also 208
within the sequence corresponding to the ψnad5-2 gene. The putative RNA editing sites in the 209
nad1 pre-RNA are also shown in Supplemental Figure 3. 210
We further performed RACE to characterize the putative position of the 5’ and 3’ ends of 211
the nad1 i4 pre-RNA transcripts. Using circularized mt-RNAs as templates for the RACE 212
analyses (Eyal et al., 1999; Forner et al., 2007), the sequencing data of the RACE products 213
identified only mitochondrial transcripts that harbored the matR gene together with the upstream 214
regions of nad1 i4, the fourth exon in nad1 (i.e. nad1 ex4), and a stretch of 120 additional 215
nucleotides (i.e. the longest RACE sequence identified) upstream to nad1 ex4 belonging to the 216
3’-end of the trans-spliced nad1 i3 (see Supplemental Figure 3). No transcripts containing only 217
the matR-ORF could be identified by the RACE analyses. The 3’ end of the transcript included 218
about 240 nucleotides downstream of nad1 ex5. 219
Comparisons of the deduced MatR protein sequences from various plants indicate a high 220
flexibility of the N-terminal domains (Supplemental Figure 1). The upstream region of the 221
canonical start site of the MatR sequences contains putative codons that are also recognized as a 222
part of the conserved RT-2 sequence block of group II intron-encoded MATs (Figure 2 and 223
Supplemental Figure 1). Interestingly, different editing sites identified by the RNA-seq and 224
RACE data also included a C-to-U substitution 28 nucleotides upstream of the first common 225
AUG, found inside this putative RT-2 motif of MatR-ORF (Supplemental Figure 3). It will 226
therefore be interesting to investigate whether the translation of MatR may initiate upstream to 227
8
the first common AUG site. Although translation from non-AUG codons has not yet been proven 228
for mitochondria in plants, there is some indirect evidence indicating that GTG and AUA can 229
initiate translation for several mitochondrial genes in different plant species (see e.g. (Bock et al., 230
1994; Siculella et al., 1996; Zhu et al., 2014). 231
The maturation of pre-RNAs in plant organelles involves a complex series of post-232
transcriptional maturation events, which include 5' and 3' end processing and numerous 233
nucleation events that lead to the release of the mRNAs from their corresponding polycistronic 234
transcripts (see e.g. (Germain et al., 2013; Small et al., 2013; Brown et al., 2014; Hammani and 235
Giege, 2014). While the putative 5′ and 3’ terminal regions of nad1 i4 are likely generated post-236
transcriptionally, no RNAs corresponding to the MatR coding region alone, nor to any 237
alternative matR transcripts other than the nad1 ex4-i4-ex5 pre-RNA, were supported by the 238
RNA-seq and RACE data. These observations may imply that, similar to the bacterial maturases 239
(reviewed by (Lambowitz and Zimmerly, 2011; Zimmerly and Semper, 2015), MatR translation 240
is facilitated by mitoribosomes that are directly associated with the pre-RNA of nad1 i4. Yet, the 241
data are not sufficient to assess whether translation is initiated by non-AUG start codons. Studies 242
are underway to test this intriguing possibility. 243
244
matR encodes a ~70 kDa protein that is associated with mitochondrial membranes 245
We anticipate that the matR locus encodes a functional protein, but this notion was not yet tested 246
experimentally. MatR was not found among the different proteins identified in global mass-247
spectrometry (LC/MS-MS) analyses of plant organellar preparations (Jacoby et al., 2010; Taylor 248
et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2012; Huang et al., 2013; Nelson et al., 2013; Nelson et al., 2014; 249
Shingaki-Wells et al., 2014). However, this may be expected due to its predicted low expression 250
level in the mitochondria, as was also evident in the cases of MatK (Zoschke et al., 2010) and the 251
nucleus-encoded (nMAT) homologs (Keren et al., 2009; Keren et al., 2012; Cohen et al., 2014), 252
as well as various other RNA-processing enzymes in the mitochondria in angiosperms (Law et 253
al., 2012). 254
As no antibodies to MatR protein were available prior to this study, a polyclonal antibody 255
was raised against a synthetic peptide corresponding to a unique region in the RT domain, which 256
is conserved among different Brassicales (i.e. NH3-RRIDDQENPGEEASFNA) (Supplemental 257
Figure 1). The affinity and specificity of the antibody was confirmed in protein gel-blots using 258
9
total protein and enriched organelle preparations (i.e. mitochondria, chloroplasts and 259
peroxisomes) obtained from 3-week-old Arabidopsis thaliana var. Columbia (Figure 3). The 260
immunoblots with the anti-MatR antibodies showed a single band corresponding to a protein of 261
about 70 kDa, which is also the expected size for a native MatR protein (calculated mass 73.65 262
kDa, assuming that MatR translation initiates at the first common AUG site; see Supplemental 263
Figure 1); this was observed only in the mitochondria subfraction (Figure 3A). The use of 264
antibodies to the mitochondrial proteins serine-hydroxymethyltransferase (SHMT) and 265
cytochrome oxidase subunit 2 (COX2), the plastid-encoded 33 kDa subunit of the oxygen 266
evolving complex of PSII (PsbO) and the peroxisomal marker catalase (CAT) protein confirmed 267
that the organelle preparations were highly enriched (Figure 3A). 268
We further investigated whether MatR is found in the soluble (matrix) or membranous 269
fractions in the mitochondria. For this purpose, intact mitochondria (Figure 3B) were disrupted 270
by several freeze and thaw cycles followed by sonication and then separated by centrifugation 271
into the pellet, which contains the membranes (M) and the supernatant (S) containing the matrix 272
components. The fractionation procedure was validated by protein gel blot analyses with 273
antibodies against SHMT (as an indicator of matrix proteins), while COX2 was used as a marker 274
of organellar (inner) membrane proteins (Figure 3B). Unexpectedly, the immunoblot assays 275
show that the MatR protein is enriched in the mitochondrial membranous fraction (Figure 3B), 276
even though the deduced protein sequence of MatR lacks any obvious membrane targeting 277
motifs. 278
To investigate the topology of MatR in the mitochondria, the membrane fraction was pre-279
washed with 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0 (to remove contaminating proteins) and then treated with 1 280
M NaCl (removes loosely attached membrane proteins), 2 M NaBr (a chaotropic agent used for 281
the removal of some peripherally-bound proteins), or 0.05% (v/v) Triton X-100 + 1 M NaCl (this 282
low concentration of the detergent will not completely solubilize the membranes but can wash 283
peripheral proteins attached by surface hydrophobic interactions) (Ostersetzer et al., 2007). The 284
data indicate that MatR is likely to be peripherally associated with the membranes, as neither the 285
10 mM Tris-HCl nor the 1 M NaCl treatments released the protein from the membranes, whereas 286
treating the organellar membranes with 2 M NaBr or 0.05% Triton X-100 + 1 M NaCl removed 287
the MatR signal from the membranes (Figure 3C). Similarly to MatR, the peripheral AtpB 288
subunit of the mitochondrial ATP-synthase coupling factor-1 (CF1) was removed by either 2 M 289
10
NaBr or 0.05% Triton X-100 + 1 M NaCl, but not by the 10 mM Tris-HCl or 1 M NaCl washes. 290
In contrast to MatR and AtpB, the 2 M NaBr wash did not remove the signals of the Nad9 291
subunit of the soluble arm of complex I or the COX2 protein of complex IV, which is integrally 292
associated with the mitochondrial inner-membranes. While the Nad9 subunit was largely 293
removed from the membranes by 0.05% Triton X-100 + 1 M NaCl, the integral COX2 protein 294
was only partially affected by the detergent treatment (Figure 3C). Taken together, these results 295
indicate that the MatR protein associates peripherally with membranes. As MatR is synthesized 296
inside the organelles, we speculate that the protein is associated with the organellar inner 297
membranes. 298
299
MatR expression profiles in Arabidopsis thaliana 300
The relative accumulation of transcripts corresponding to matR and nad1 in Arabidopsis was 301
analyzed by RT-qPCR in different plant tissues and during different development stages (Figure 302
4). The data indicate that the steady-state levels of transcripts corresponding to matR/nad1-i4 and 303
to the mature nad1 exons 4-5 were all below detectable levels in dry (desiccated) seeds. Notably, 304
accumulation of transcripts corresponding to matR/nad1 i4 pre-mRNAs was evident as early as 2 305
hours after initial seed imbibition (Figure 4). The steady-state levels of matR pre-RNA 306
transcripts gradually increased during the imbibition stage, reaching the highest level between 12 307
to 48 hours after initial water uptake by the dry seed. Based on the RNA-seq and RACE data, it 308
is anticipated that matR is co-transcribed with nad1 i4. The subtle differences in the 309
accumulation of transcripts corresponding to matR and nad1 i4 pre-RNA may be due to the 310
differences caused by the RT-qPCR analyses, i.e. the use of different sets of oligonucleotides or 311
the differences in the sizes of the PCR products (153 nts and 64 nts, respectively) (see Figure 4). 312
Following seed initiation, where the radicle protrudes through the seed coat (i.e. about 48 hours), 313
the levels of matR transcripts steadily decreased throughout the plant’s development. In contrast 314
to the matR expression profiles, accumulation of mature nad1 RNA transcripts corresponding to 315
ex4-5 was apparent only after ~24 hours of seed imbibition (Figure 4). Following this step, the 316
steady-state levels of nad1 ex4-5 mRNA gradually increased, peaking around 10 days after seed 317
initiation (Figure 4). 318
To analyze the accumulation of MatR and various other mitochondrial proteins during 319
early seed germination, total protein was extracted from dry and imbibed Arabidopsis seed 320
11
following 1 and 2 days of imbibition, and the accumulation of mitochondrial proteins was 321
examined by SDS-PAGE and protein gel blotting analyses (Figure 5). The immunoblots 322
indicated that the ~70 kDa band, corresponding to the MatR protein, was hardly detectable in the 323
dry seeds, whereas it was clearly visible in the imbibed seeds after 24 hours and further increased 324
in its levels after 48 hours of imbibition. However, the MatR protein signal was noticeably 325
reduced (about 2.5x lower) in mature Arabidopsis seedlings (i.e. at 1.0x dilution) compared with 326
the levels of MatR in germinating seeds two days following the initial imbibition stage (Figure 327
5A). The levels of the outer mitochondrial membrane protein porin-1 (VDAC1) were also higher 328
(1.3~1.8x) in seeds than in mature (i.e. 3-week-old) seedlings. In Arabidopsis, VDAC1 has a 329
ubiquitous expression pattern but shows particularly high expression levels in reproductive 330
organs and during germination and early seedling establishment (Pan et al., 2014). 331
The levels of several other mitochondrial proteins, including Nad9 and the nucleus-332
encoded CA2 (carbonic anhydrase like subunit 2) of complex I (CI), the Rieske Iron-Sulfur 333
protein (RISP) of CIII, the COX2 subunit of CIV, and the AtpB subunit of the ATP-synthase 334
enzyme (CV) also increased during the imbibition stage (Figure 5A). Yet, unlike the patterns of 335
MatR and VDAC1 accumulation, the steady-state levels of these proteins were not significantly 336
altered during the first 24 hours of seed imbibition and increased only 48 hours following initial 337
seed imbibition. Unlike MatR and VDAC1, the highest steady-state levels of the respiratory 338
subunits Nad9, CA2, RISP, COX2 and AtpB, were observed in mature plants rather than seeds 339
(Figure 5A). Blue-native (BN)-PAGE gel electrophoresis, followed by protein gel blot analyses, 340
corroborated the immunoblot results. The mitochondrial holo-complexes corresponding to CI, 341
CIII, CIV and CV had the lowest abundances in dry seeds, but then gradually increased in their 342
levels during the 48 hours of imbibition, showing the highest abundances in mature (i.e. 3-week-343
old) seedlings (Figure 5B). The numbers below the blots in Figure 5 show the relative 344
accumulation (quantified using ImageJ software (Jensen, 2013) of different organellar proteins 345
during the imbibition stage and in mature, 3-week-old Arabidopsis seedlings. 346
347
MatR is associated with various pre-RNAs in Brassicales mitochondria 348
It was previously noted that group II intron-containing pre-RNAs are associated with their 349
corresponding splicing cofactors in bacteria and chloroplasts in plants (Stern et al., 2010; Barkan, 350
2011; Lambowitz and Zimmerly, 2011; Germain et al., 2013). Likewise, the mitochondrial 351
12
maturase-related nMAT2 protein is bound to several group II RNAs, which were also identified 352
as the native intron targets of the protein in vivo (Keren et al., 2009). These data suggest that 353
splicing cofactors of group II introns are associated specifically with those introns whose 354
splicing they facilitate in bacteria and in plant organelles. Accordingly, co-immunoprecipitation 355
(co-IP) analyses with antibodies raised against different organellar splicing factors indicated that 356
the plant factors typically co-precipitated with their ‘genetically-defined’ intron targets (see e.g. 357
(Ostheimer et al., 2003; Schmitz-Linneweber et al., 2005; Schmitz-Linneweber et al., 2006; 358
Asakura and Barkan, 2007; Watkins et al., 2007; Keren et al., 2009; Zoschke et al., 2010). Here, 359
we further applied this approach to define and catalog the native RNA targets of MatR protein. 360
For this purpose, anti-MatR antibodies were used in pull-down experiments to pellet the 361
associated MatR-RNP complexes from solubilized (1% NP-40, v/v) mitochondria preparations 362
obtained from cauliflower inflorescences. cDNAs prepared from the RNA recovered by the co-363
IPs were applied to custom arrays and analyzed by hybridization to specific intron probes (see 364
Methods; and Supplemental Figure 4). Commercial antibodies against the mitochondrial SHMT 365
protein (Supplemental Table 1) were used as a control for the RNA co-366
immunoprecipitation/microarray (RIP)-chip analysis. RNAs identified by the MatR-RIP-chip 367
assay included nad1 i4, the host intron of matR, as well as several other organellar transcripts, 368
including nad1 i1, nad1 i3, nad4 i1, nad5 i4, nad7 i2, rpl2 i1 and rps3 i1 (Figure 6 and 369
Supplemental Figure 4). In addition to these RNAs, weaker signals were seen in the cases of 370
nad2 i2, i3 and i4 and nad4 i2 (Supplemental Figure 4). The signals of abundant organellar 371
transcripts, such as tRNAs, rRNAs and many of the organellar mRNAs, were all below 372
detectable levels, strongly supporting the specificity of the RIP-chip analyses. 373
The association of MatR with pre-RNAs corresponding to nad1, nad4, nad5, rpl2 and 374
rps3 was also supported by sequencing analyses of cDNA libraries prepared from the pelleted 375
RNAs obtained from the co-IPs with MatR antibodies (Supplemental File 1). Therefore, we 376
assume that the nad1, nad5, nad7, rpl2 and rps3 pre-RNAs represent the native intron targets of 377
the MatR protein in Brassicales mitochondria. Unlike MatR, no RNAs were identified in the 378
SHMT-related RIP-chip analysis (Supplemental Figure 4). 379
In addition to identifying and characterizing mt-RNAs that are associated with the MatR 380
protein, we also characterized different proteins that are found together with MatR in 381
mitochondrial ribonucleoprotein particle(s) in vivo (i.e. proteins that have been co-precipitated 382
13
with MatR in the RIP-chip assays). LC/MS-MS analyses of MatR indicated the presence of 383
several mitochondrial proteins that co-precipitated with MatR (Supplemental Table 2). Several 384
proteins, such as heat shock proteins, prohibitins, and ATP-synthase subunits, are abundant in 385
the mitochondria and may therefore be non-specifically precipitated by the MatR antibodies 386
(some were also identified by the co-IPs with SHMT antibodies). Yet, in addition to MatR, other 387
proteins identified by the co-IPs may correspond to splicing cofactors that are associated together 388
with MatR in splicesomal-like RNP particles in the mitochondria (see e.g. (Schmitz-Linneweber 389
et al., 2015). Such proteins may include the splicing cofactor DEAD-box ATP-dependent RNA 390
helicase 53 (PMH2) (Köhler et al., 2010) and a few other RNA-binding cofactors belonging to 391
the large family of the pentatricopeptide repeat-containing (PPR) proteins in plants (Small and 392
Peeters, 2000) (Supplemental Table 2). Importantly, these data indicate that polypeptides 393
corresponding to the MatR protein are indeed present in angiosperm mitochondria. 394
395
Down-regulation of MatR expression by a pioneering ribozyme-based strategy in 396
Arabidopsis mitochondria 397
The RIP-chip data indicate that MatR is associated with many mitochondrial pre-RNAs (Figure 6 398
and Supplemental Figure 4). However, these data are not sufficient to indicate a direct role for 399
MatR in the processing of group II introns in angiosperms mitochondria. As no methods are 400
currently available to modify mtDNA in plants, we sought to utilize a modified hammerhead 401
ribozyme system, which was recently shown to cleave and thereby strongly down-regulate the 402
accumulation of mitochondrial atp9 transcripts in vivo (Val et al., 2011). To investigate the roles 403
of MatR in the processing of group II intron-containing transcripts in plant mitochondria, 404
synthetically engineered trans-cleaving hammerhead ribozymes (matRz1 and matRz2), designed 405
to cleave inside the matR reading frame, were driven into the organelles as "passenger" 406
molecules conjugated to a tRNAVal-like shuttle RNA ‘vector’ (Figure 7; and (Val et al., 2011). 407
Because the functions of MatR may be essential to the plant, the chimeric constructs, comprising 408
the matR-ribozyme components fused to the tRNA-like shuttle vector, were cloned under an 409
estradiol-inducible promoter (Zuo et al., 2000). To assess possible side effects caused by the 410
expression of mitochondria-localized ribozymes, we further designed a ribozyme against the 411
tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) mitochondrial sdh3 gene (Figure 7), which is not present in the 412
mitochondria of Brassicaceae, including Arabidopsis. The transgenic lines matRz1 and matRz2 413
14
represent individual transformants expressing different synthetic ribozymes that were designed to 414
affect the expression of the Arabidopsis thaliana matR gene in two separate gene-loci (see Figure 415
7). 416
Upon induction of the matRz ribozymes, the levels of matR transcripts were reduced by 417
50–60% in the matRz1 and the matRz2 lines, as determined by RT-qPCR analyses (Figure 8 and 418
Supplemental Figure 5). The steady-state levels of the matR transcripts remained low for at least 419
5 days following estrogen induction of the transgenes. Accordingly, the steady-state levels of 420
MatR protein also decreased and was reduced by ~50% in matRz1 and by ~20% in matRz2 after 421
5 days following the induction of the matRz ribozymes (Figure 8 and Supplemental Figure 5). No 422
significant changes in MatR accumulation and expression were seen in the control sdhRz lines 423
(Figure 8). Ribozyme-mediated knockdown of matR had no significant effect on the steady-state 424
levels of various intronless mitochondrial RNAs (see Supplemental Figure 5). Under normal 425
growth conditions (see Methods), expression of the ribozymes generated no obvious phenotypic 426
differences between the transgenic lines and wild-type plants (i.e. within the time-frame 427
considered) (Supplemental Figure 6). This may be expected due to only partial reductions in 428
MatR expression in the two matRz lines (Figure 8 and Supplemental Figure 5), while the 429
complete loss of matR gene function is expected to be lethal to the plant. 430
The accumulation of each of the 23 group II introns in Arabidopsis mitochondria (Unseld 431
et al., 1997), including nad1 i1-i4, nad2 i1-i4, nad4 i1-i3, nad5 i1-i4, nad7 i1-i4, cox2 i1, ccmFc 432
i1, rpl2 i1, rps3 i1 and their flanking exons, was analyzed in the matRz and sdhRz lines at the 433
time of induction (Figure 9A) and 5-days (Figure 9B) following the addition of estrogen to the 434
growth medium. The expression profiling of the Arabidopsis mt-RNAs by RT-qPCR was 435
performed generally as described previously (Colas des Francs-Small et al., 2012; Keren et al., 436
2012; Zmudjak et al., 2013; Cohen et al., 2014). Oligonucleotides designed for the different exon 437
and intron sequences are indicated in Supplemental Table 3A. Introns that were notably affected 438
by the reduction in MatR expression (i.e. at day 5) included the sole introns within rpl2, rps3, 439
cox2 and ccmFc (all in a ‘cis’ configuration) as well as nad1 i3 (trans-spliced), nad1 i4 (cis-440
spliced), nad5 i4 (cis-spliced), and nad7 i2 (cis-spliced) (Figure 9). To a lesser extent, reduced 441
splicing efficiencies (i.e. higher pre-RNA to mRNA ratios) were also seen in the cases of nad2 i4 442
(cis-spliced), nad4 i3 (cis-spliced) and nad5 i3 (trans-spliced). In each case, the accumulation of 443
unspliced pre-mRNAs was correlated with decreased transcript levels in the corresponding 444
15
mRNAs, in both matRz1 and matRz2 lines, compared with those of the control sdhRz plants 445
(Figure 9 and Supplemental Figure 7). Accumulation of pre-mRNAs in the matR-reduced lines 446
was also apparent for nad2 i4, nad4 i3 and nad5 i3 (Figure 9B). However, as the corresponding 447
mRNA levels (i.e. spliced exons) were not significantly affected in the matRz lines 448
(Supplemental Figure 7), we could not draw any firm conclusions regarding the putative roles of 449
MatR in the splicing of these introns. The levels of mt-RNAs corresponding to nad2 exons 2-3, 450
exons 3-4 (and to some extent nad2 exons 4-5, as well), and nad5 exons 1-2 were somewhat 451
higher in the matRz lines, while no significant differences in the transcript levels of nad1 i1 and 452
i2, nad2 i1, nad4 i1, nad7 i1, i3 and i4, or their corresponding mRNAs (i.e. spliced exons) were 453
seen between the sdhRz and matRz lines (Figure 9 and Supplemental Figure 7). Thus, we 454
conclude that the splicing of this entire subset of mitochondrial RNAs does not require MatR. 455
456
DISCUSSION 457
Angiosperm genomes encode several MAT-related proteins, which function in the splicing 458
of different subsets of organellar group II introns 459
Sequences similar to retroviral-type reverse transcriptases (RT) are widely distributed among 460
different organisms. In bacteria, such genes include various ORFs encoded within many of the 461
group II introns termed as maturases (MATs) (Reviewed in e.g. (Lambowitz and Zimmerly, 462
2011; Lambowitz and Belfort, 2015; Zimmerly and Semper, 2015). These were shown to act 463
specifically in the splicing and intron mobility (i.e. retrohoming) activities of their own cognate 464
intron RNAs. While the chemistry of the splicing reaction is mediated by the introns themselves, 465
mounting evidence indicates that the MATs are required to facilitate or to stabilize the folding of 466
the highly structured group II RNAs into their catalytically active forms. 467
Plant genomes encode several proteins that are closely related to bacterial group II 468
reverse transcriptase/maturase proteins (Figure 3) (Mohr and Lambowitz, 2003; Knoop, 2012; 469
Brown et al., 2014; Schmitz-Linneweber et al., 2015). In angiosperms, these include MatK 470
encoded by the group II intron of trnK (i.e. tRNALys UUU) in the plastids (Mohr et al., 1993), 471
four nucleus-encoded maturases (i.e. nMAT1 to 4) (Mohr and Lambowitz, 2003) that were all 472
shown to reside in the mitochondria in Arabidopsis (Keren et al., 2009), and the mitochondrial 473
MatR ORF found inside nad1 i4 (Wahleithner et al., 1990) that is in the focus of this work. 474
16
The six maturases in angiosperms are all expected to function in the splicing of different 475
subsets of group II introns in plant organelles (Schmitz-Linneweber et al., 2015). Genetic and 476
biochemical studies indicate a role for MatK in the processing of about half of the plastidial 477
introns, all belonging to sub-group IIA (Zoschke et al., 2010). Likewise, the functions of the 478
nucleus-encoded nMAT homologs, including nMAT1, nMAT2 and nMAT4, are required for the 479
splicing of various group II introns in the mitochondria, many of which reside within RNAs 480
encoding complex I subunits (Nakagawa and Sakurai, 2006; Keren et al., 2009; Keren et al., 481
2012; Cohen et al., 2014). It is therefore anticipated that other plant maturases, including the 482
nucleus-encoded nMAT3 and the mitochondria-encoded MatR proteins, will also function in the 483
splicing of mitochondrial pre-RNAs in plants. Further investigations of the roles of nMAT3 are 484
underway in our laboratories. The matR sequence has remained intact in the mtDNAs of nearly 485
all angiosperms and gymnosperms (Guo and Mower, 2013). Furthermore, analyses of the 486
transcription profiles of many plant species indicate that matR transcripts undergo various RNA-487
editing events that restore conserved amino acids (see also Supplemental Figure 3). Here, we 488
provide multiple lines of evidence indicating that the matR locus encodes a protein that functions 489
in the processing of many mitochondrial group II intron-containing RNAs in Brassicales. 490
491
The 3D homology model of MatR reveals similarities with canonical bacterial maturases 492
A major advance in the understanding of the functionality of maturases (MATs) in group II 493
intron splicing has been recently accomplished by structural analyses of bacterial MATs bound 494
to their cognate group II intron RNAs (Piccirilli and Staley, 2016; Qu et al., 2016; Zhao and 495
Pyle, 2016). These including the crystal structures of the RT domains of MATs from the bacteria 496
Roseburia intestinalis and Eubacterium rectale (Zhao and Pyle, 2016), and a cryo-EM analysis 497
of the ribonucleoprotein complex of the Lactobacillus lactis intron-encoded LtrA maturase 498
bound to its host ltrB intron RNA (Qu et al., 2016). Analyses of the structures of the spliced ltrB 499
intron (at 4.5 Å resolution) and of the ltrB intron in its ribonucleoprotein complex with LtrA (at 500
3.8 Å resolution) are further revealing functional coordination between the intron RNA with its 501
cognate MAT-protein. Remarkably, these structures reveal close relationships between the RT 502
catalytic domain and telomerases, whereas the ‘active splicing centers’ resemble that of the Prp8 503
protein (Dlakic and Mushegian, 2011; Galej et al., 2013; Yan et al., 2015), which also resides at 504
the core of the spliceosome. 505
17
We tested whether MatR in plants may adopt a structural fold similar to that of bacterial 506
maturases (e.g. LtrA protein). Using the ‘RaptorX’ web-server (Kallberg et al., 2012), we 507
constructed a homology 3D model of the Arabidopsis MatR protein (Supplemental Figure 8) in 508
an attempt to map functional domains in MatR and to address its putative roles in mitochondria 509
group II intron RNA recognition and splicing. The predicted structure of MatR includes most of 510
the regions of the fingers-palm motif and the thumb (X) domain (Supplemental Figure 8). As 511
MatR shows only limited homology in the C-terminal region to model maturases, this region 512
could not be fully modeled. We were also unable to provide a structural prediction of the two 513
insertions in MatR found inside the fingers-palm (Figure 2 and Supplemental Figure 8, labeled 514
with dotted lines) due to the lack of homology of these regions with known protein sequences. 515
Nonetheless, the superimposed 3D model of MatR protein fits quite well with the established 516
structures of the bacterial LtrA maturase (Supplemental Figure 8). 517
We further speculate that predicted basic surfaces in MatR (i.e. positively charged 518
regions; see Supplemental Figure 8, regions labeled in blue) may correspond to RNA-binding 519
sites required for the association of the protein with its target pre-RNA molecules, in a similar 520
manner to the bacterial maturases (Qu et al., 2016; Zhao and Pyle, 2016). However, additional 521
structural studies and biochemical assays would be required to confirm the hypothetical 3D 522
model of MatR protein structure and to analyze its binding characteristics. 523
524
The N-terminal region of MatR: Potential use of alternative translation initiation sites for 525
MatR proteins in angiosperms mitochondria 526
Comparison of the deduced amino-acid sequences of MatR-ORFs from different angiosperms 527
indicates a promiscuous mode of translational initiation. Some, including MATs in dicots, most 528
monocots, and a few rosids, begin with an ‘AGA’ triplet (for arginine) followed by 18 putative 529
‘codons’ upstream of the first common initiation (AUG) site (i.e. 530
RKKEGLKFRLTVVLPIEKIM), while other MatR-ORFs in eudicots (e.g. Nicotiana tabacum) 531
begin with the ‘GGG’ triplet (for glycine) (i.e. RKK*GSKFRPLTVVLPIEKIM), and a stop 532
codon is found at the 4th codon position in the matR’s coding region (Supplemental Figure 1). 533
Interestingly, the codons upstream of the canonical start site are recognized as part of the 534
conserved RT-2 sequence block of group II maturases (Figure 2 and Supplemental Figure 1). 535
The translation of some nuclear genes in eukaryotes can initiate at codons that differ from the 536
18
consensus site in one base (e.g. CUG, ACG, AUU and GUG) (Kozak, 1989; Gordon et al., 1992; 537
Hann, 1994; Kozak, 1997). Prokaryotes and mitochondria in animals use alternative initiation 538
codons more frequently (commonly U/GUG in bacteria and AUA/U in animal mitochondria) 539
(Lobanov et al., 2010). Although the translation from non-AUG codons has not yet been proven 540
for mitochondria in plants, there is some indirect evidence strongly indicating that GUG and 541
AUA can initiate translation for several mitochondrial genes in different plant species (Bock et 542
al., 1994; Siculella et al., 1996; Zhu et al., 2014). 543
544
The expression of MatR is developmentally regulated 545
Gene expression mechanisms that occur in plant mitochondria include RNA editing, splicing of 546
many group II introns, and numerous nucleation events that lead to the release of mRNAs from 547
their organellar-encoded polycistronic transcripts (see e.g. (Germain et al., 2013; Small et al., 548
2013; Brown et al., 2014; Hammani and Giege, 2014). The MatR ORF in angiosperm 549
mitochondria is found within the fourth intron in nad1. An uncertainty regarding MatR 550
expression in angiosperms involves the transcription of the gene by an alternative promoter site 551
found inside nad1 i4, upstream from the matR locus. In wheat, this may lead to the expression of 552
a truncated MatR product, which lacks most of the N-terminal RT domain (Farre and Araya, 553
1999). The expression of MatR in Arabidopsis and cauliflower was studied here by different 554
RNA and protein methodologies. RNA-seq and RACE analyses (Supplemental Figure 2 and 3) 555
indicated that MatR is co-transcribed together with its host nad1 i4, but failed to reveal the 556
presence of any transcripts containing only the MatR ORF, arguing against the presence of any 557
internal transcriptional start sites in cauliflower. As MatR is most likely required for the 558
maturation of its own transcript, we speculate that MatR is translated directly from the unspliced 559
precursor nad1 ex4-i4-ex5 transcript, in a similar manner to the canonical maturases encoded by 560
group II introns in bacterial genomes (Lambowitz and Zimmerly, 2011; Zimmerly and Semper, 561
2015). 562
The immunoblot assays with anti-MatR antibodies identified a single protein of ~70 kDa 563
in the mitochondria, which corresponds to an intact MatR protein (Figure 3A). No additional 564
protein bands corresponding to polypeptides of either lower or higher molecular weight were 565
seen in the protein gel blot analyses. In the mitochondria, MatR was found to be associated 566
mainly with the membranes (Figure 3B). Analysis of MatR topology by different salt and 567
19
detergent treatments indicated that the protein is most likely peripherally bound to the 568
membranes (Figure 3C). The association of MatR with the membranes is surprising, especially 569
as its plastidial homolog, MatK, is found in the stromal chloroplast fraction (Zoschke et al., 570
2010). Thus, it remains possible that under the low salt conditions used for mitochondrial sub-571
fractionation (see the Methods section), MatR interacts non-specifically with the negatively 572
charged organellar membranes. Alternatively, the binding of MatR with the membranes might be 573
facilitated by its association with membrane-bound ribonucleoprotein particle(s) (see e.g. 574
(Uyttewaal et al., 2008). 575
The accumulation of MatR and several other mitochondrial proteins was studied during 576
early developmental stages in Arabidopsis (Figure 4 and 5). The data indicate that the expression 577
and accumulation of MatR, at both the RNA and protein levels, is upregulated during early seed 578
imbibition, but declines progressively after the initiation stage as plant development proceeds. 579
These data suggest that the MatR protein is unstable and undergoes degradation via the 580
proteolytic machinery in the mitochondria. The levels of VDAC1 were also higher in 581
germinating seeds compared mature (i.e. 3-week-old) seedlings. In Arabidopsis, VDAC1 is 582
required for maintaining the steady state of mitochondrial transmembrane potential (ΔΨ) and 583
hence for optimal respiratory activities, and its functions were found to be critical during the 584
reproductive stage and during early germination (Pan et al., 2014). In contrast to MatR and 585
Porin, the steady-levels of various other mitochondrial proteins, including Nad9, CA2, RISP, 586
COX2 and AtpB, all increased in during plant development, with the highest accumulation levels 587
seen in mature plants. In accordance with these data, faster turnover rates were linked to proteins 588
involved in DNA/RNA metabolism and the stress response in the mitochondria, whereas 589
subunits of the respiratory machinery are generally more stable in Arabidopsis cells (Nelson et 590
al., 2013; Nelson et al., 2014). 591
592
Unlike canonical maturases, MatR is involved in the splicing of many group II-containing 593
pre-RNAs in Brassicales mitochondria 594
We expected that MatR would be involved in the splicing of group II introns in the plant 595
mitochondria. To establish the roles of MatR in mitochondrial RNA metabolism, we used two 596
complementary approaches. The first strategy involved the identification of mt-RNAs that are 597
stably associated with MatR in vivo using RIP-chip assays (Schmitz-Linneweber et al., 2005; 598
20
Keene et al., 2006; Townley-Tilson et al., 2006). RNAs identified by the RIP-chip method 599
involved different transcripts that all contained group II introns, including nad1 i1, i3 and i4, 600
nad4 i1, nad5 i3 and i4, nad7 i2, rpl2 i1, and rps3 i1 (Figure 6 and Supplemental Figure 4). 601
Sequencing data from mt-RNAs, which co-precipitated with the MatR protein (Supplemental 602
File 1), indicated that the signals detected by the microarrays in the MatR co-IPs likely 603
corresponded to unspliced precursor RNAs, or that MatR is also associated with the spliced 604
exons, in vivo. Accordingly, the 3D structure of the ribonucleoprotein complex of LtrA bound to 605
its cognate ltrB intron RNA indicated that the spliced exons remain associated with the LtrA 606
protein, while the LtrA-depleted ltrB intron structures lack any exon sequences (Qu et al., 2016). 607
However, LtrA binds less tightly to the spliced ltrB intron RNA than to the exon-containing 608
precursor RNA, and the binding of LtrA to the intron lariat can be enhanced in the presence of 609
oligoribonucleotids, corresponding to sequences of intron-exon binding sites. The RIP-chip data 610
suggest that MATs in plant organelles also demonstrate high affinities in their binding to 611
precursor RNAs. 612
It was anticipated that MatR would associate in vivo with those introns whose splicing is 613
facilitated by the protein. However, this assumption needed to be supported experimentally. 614
Accordingly, the second approach involved a pioneering strategy for the down-regulation of the 615
expression of mitochondrial genes by synthetically designed ribozymes that are conjugated to a 616
tRNA-like shuttle vector RNA. Using a similar approach, the expression of the mitochondrial 617
atp9 mRNA and Atp9 subunit was reduced by about 80% and 50%, respectively (Val et al., 618
2011). As the functions of MatR were expected to be essential in the plant, the expression of the 619
matRz1 and matRz2 ribozymes (Figure 7) was regulated by the inducible β-estradiol-mediated 620
gene expression system (Zuo et al., 2000). 621
The expression of matRz1 and matRz2 ribozymes resulted in reductions in MatR gene 622
expression (up to 50% decrease in transcript levels and 20–50% reductions in MatR protein 623
levels in matRz2 and matRz1, respectively) (Figure 8 and Supplemental Figure 5), leading to 624
splicing deficiencies in many organellar pre-mRNAs in both transformant lines (Figure 9B). 625
These particularly included nad1 i3 and i4, as well as the splicing of efficiencies of nad5 i4, 626
nad7 i2, rpl2 i1 and rps3 i1 pre-RNAs (Figure 9B). A reduction in nad1 i3 pre-RNA may 627
correspond to an indirect effect, since the 3' part of this trans-spliced intron is co-transcribed 628
with nad1 i4 and the matR-ORF (Supplemental Figure 2). Thus, the cleavage of matR reading-629
21
frame may also lead to RNA instability of nad1 i3. On the other hand, the majority of the introns 630
whose splicing was affected by the expression of the matR ribozymes were also found to be 631
associated with MatR in vivo by the RIP-chip analysis (Figure 6 and Supplemental Figure 4), 632
including nad1 intron 3. It therefore anticipated that this intron, together with multiple other 633
group II introns highlighted in our experiments, is a processing substrate of MatR. Yet, some 634
pre-RNAs that were identified in the RIP-chip assay (Figure 6 and Supplemental Figure 4) were 635
not significantly affected in their splicing upon downregulating matR expression (i.e. nad1 i1 and 636
nad4 i1; Figure 9). Such differences between the RIP-chip data and the analysis of splicing 637
efficiencies in matR knockdown lines by RT-qPCR may correspond to the limited resolution of 638
the RNA footprints, but they more likely correspond to only a partial reduction in the expression 639
of MatR upon the induction of matRz1 or matRz2 ribozyme expression (see Figure 8 and 640
Supplemental Figure 5). Likewise, the nucleus-encoded nMAT1, nMAT2, and nMAT4 proteins 641
also facilitate the splicing of different subsets of mitochondrial introns (Keren et al., 2009; Keren 642
et al., 2012; Cohen et al., 2014), while the plastidial homolog, MatK, was shown to be associated 643
with many of the subgroup-IIA intron RNAs in vivo (Zoschke et al., 2010). Table 1 summarizes 644
the putative RNA targets of the MatR protein in Brassicales mitochondria. 645
646
MatR functions are likely to be critical during early stages in plant development 647
As indicated in Figure 8, splicing efficiencies were only partially affected in matRz1 and matRz2 648
lines, and significant levels of mature transcripts (mRNAs) corresponding to nad1, nad4, nad5, 649
nad7, cox2, ccmFc, rpl2, and rps3 were seen in both transgenic lines. It is possible that in 650
addition to MatR, the splicing of some of these mt-RNAs also involves additional nucleus-651
encoded factors (reviewed in (Brown et al., 2014; Schmitz-Linneweber et al., 2015). For 652
example, both nMAT4 and mCSF1 are involved in the maturation of nad1 i3, while the splicing 653
of nad1 i4 requires at least nMAT4 and MatR (Zmudjak et al., 2013; Brown et al., 2014; Cohen 654
et al., 2014; Schmitz-Linneweber et al., 2015). Yet, it is also anticipated that the RNA 655
phenotypes we observe correspond to only a partial silencing of MatR expression in the matRz 656
lines (Figure 8 and Supplemental Figure 5). We assume that the complete loss of MatR would 657
lead to far more profound defects in the processing of these RNAs, leading to embryo-lethal 658
developmental defects. Accordingly, while a complex I knockout is expected to be viable in 659
plants (Kuhn et al., 2015; Fromm et al., 2016; Ostersetzer-Biran, 2016), the functions of other 660
22
respiratory complexes, including CIII, CIV, and the translation machinery are considered 661
essential for normal embryo development (Gu et al., 1994; Berg et al., 2005; Meyer et al., 2005; 662
Colas des Francs-Small et al., 2012; Dahan et al., 2014). 663
While the splicing efficiencies of various transcripts were affected upon matR 664
knockdown, and their corresponding mRNA levels were reduced in the transformants, several 665
mt-mRNAs accumulated to rather higher levels in both the matRz1 and matRz2 lines (Figure 8B 666
and Supplemental Figure 5 and 7). These include transcripts corresponding to nad2 exons 3-4 667
and nad5 exons 1-2 in the matRz1 and matRz2 lines. An upregulation in the steady-state levels of 668
nad2 and nad5 RNAs in matR knockdown plants may correspond to the accumulation of 669
precursor transcripts that are correctly processed by various other splicing cofactors, but cannot 670
be spliced together with the other exons, of which the maturation relies on MatR. Analogously to 671
induced matRz1 and matRz2 lines, increases in the levels of various mRNAs were also apparent 672
in nmat1 (Keren et al., 2012) and nmat4 (Cohen et al., 2014) mutants, which are also affected in 673
the maturation of nad1 and show reduced complex I levels. In the matR knockdown lines, these 674
may involve small increases in levels of the ATP-synthase subunits atp6 (in both matRz1 and 675
matRz2 lines) and atp8 (only in matRz1, also annotated as orfB,) (Supplemental Figure 6). An 676
upregulation in the steady-state levels of mRNAs in mutants affected in mitochondrial RNA 677
metabolism and complex I biogenesis may correspond to compensatory effects due to the altered 678
organellar functions, involving reduced respiration and altered cellular metabolism (see e.g. 679
(Keren et al., 2012). We anticipate that a more profound effect on MatR expression would result 680
in notable changes in the levels of various other mt-RNAs, as seen in the cases of nmat1 and 681
nmat4 mutants. 682
683
Seed plants with unusual matR genes have also lost many group II introns from their 684
mitochondrial genomes 685
The matR ORF has been retained as a putatively functional gene within the nad1 i4 intron in the 686
mitochondrial genomes of numerous plant species, and until recently it was believed to be 687
invariantly present at this position in all seed plants. In fact, recent sequencing has demonstrated 688
that the matR gene can exist in the mtDNAs of several species (most Geraniaceae, the mistletoe 689
Viscum album, the gnetophyte Welwitschia mirabilis) as a freestanding gene (Park et al., 2015; 690
Petersen et al., 2015; Guo et al., 2016), while in some plants including Viscum scurruloideum, 691
23
Pelargonium x hortorum, Croizatia brevipetiolata, and Lachnostylis bilocularis, the matR gene 692
has been lost from their mtDNAs (Wurdack and Davis, 2009; Skippington et al., 2015) and 693
Supplemental Table 4. 694
Except for Croizatia and Lachnostylis, for which mitochondrial intron content is not 695
known, all of the other species with unusual matR genes have also experienced substantial loss of 696
their mitochondrial group II introns (see Supplemental Table 4). In V. scurruloideum¸ no nuclear 697
copy of matR was detected in the sequencing data (Skippington et al., 2015), and all 698
mitochondrial introns spliced by MatR have been lost, suggesting that MatR function has been 699
lost completely from this species. In P. hortorum, although the mitochondrial matR gene was lost 700
from the mtDNA, copies of the gene were found in the nuclear genome by DNA-seq analysis of 701
P. hortorum plants (Supplemental Table 4). Comparisons of the deduced amino acid sequences 702
between the nuclear genes and ‘canonical’ (i.e. mitochondria-encoded) MatR proteins suggest 703
that the original Ph.matR gene has been split in the nucleus into two isoforms, denoted here as 704
nMAT-X and nMAT-RT, both of which are predicted by their N-terminal sequences to be 705
targeted to the mitochondria (Figure 2). The nMATR-X isoform contains an intact domain X and 706
parts of the finger-palm RT sequence blocks (5-to-7), whereas the nMatR-RT isoform harbors 707
the upstream region with the remaining RT 2 to 4 motifs, which are conserved in the 708
mitochondria-encoded matR genes. In other Geraniaceae species, the matR gene was moved 709
from its ancestral position in the nad1 i4 intron to become a freestanding gene in the 710
mitochondrial genome. Although many introns were lost from the mitochondrial genomes of all 711
Geraniaceae species, the nad7 i2 gene is still present, consistent with a need for retained function 712
for MatR and thus explaining the retention of matR. It is also possible that MatR may function in 713
these species on additional intron targets. In W. mirabilis, numerous introns have been lost from 714
the mitochondrial genome, including most, but not all, of the splicing targets of MatR in 715
Brassicales. Here again, the matR gene is in an unusual configuration, but it has not been lost 716
from the genome due to the presence of nad1 i3, nad1 i4, and nad7 i2, which require MatR 717
activity to be spliced out (Supplemental Table 4). 718
Combined, these observations provide further evidence that the matR locus encodes a 719
functional protein, which is required for the processing of many group II introns. Only after all 720
intron targets of MatR have been lost can the matR gene be fully lost from the genome, as seen in 721
V. scurruloideum (Supplemental Table 4) (Skippington et al., 2015). The V. album mitochondrial 722
24
genome has also lost all introns that require MatR activity for removal, yet a nearly complete 723
matR gene has still been retained. However, the 3’ truncation of about 150 bp suggests that the 724
gene may be in the initial stages of degradation, and it is possible that the gene is no longer 725
transcribed, although transcriptional activity was not assayed in the previous study (Petersen et al 726
2015). In Geraniaceae and Welwitschia, the loss of most introns processed by MatR correlates 727
with a modified configuration for the matR gene. These findings suggest that the loss of several 728
intron targets may reduce functional constraints on localization or co-transcription with the nad1 729
gene, enabling matR to persist as a freestanding gene in the mitochondrial or nuclear genome and 730
be transcribed independently from nad1. Nevertheless, because at least one intron spliced out by 731
MatR remains, the matR gene has still been retained in some form. These scenarios could signify 732
an intermediate stage of evolution where matR activity is reduced and may eventually be lost 733
upon loss of the remaining matR-processed introns. 734
735
MatR: an evolutionary step between the highly ‘specialized’ bacteria maturases and the 736
general spliceosomal machinery in eukaryotes? 737
Group II introns are catalytic RNAs that exist in the genetic systems of the three major domains 738
of life (i.e. archaea, bacteria and eukaryotes). Based on structural features, the similarities of 739
exon-intron boundaries and a common splicing mechanism, group-II introns are proposed to be 740
the progenitors of the eukaryotic spliceosome system (see e.g. (Schmitz-Linneweber et al., 741
2015). It has been postulated that group II introns invaded the nuclear genomes of eukaryotes 742
early during the evolutionary transition from an (α-proteo)-bacterial endosymbiont to the 743
mitochondrion. In support of this idea, some bacterial maturases have the ability to support 744
retrohoming, and recent studies have shown homology between group II maturases and the core 745
spliceosomal Prp8 factor (Dlakic and Mushegian, 2011). The structures of bacterial maturases 746
bound to their host RNAs (Qu et al., 2016; Zhao and Pyle, 2016) further support this intriguing 747
theory. Yet, it still remains unclear how the universal spliceosomal splicing machinery evolved 748
from the bacterial group II introns and their related monospecific maturase factors. Throughout 749
their evolution, organellar introns in plants have diverged considerably from their self-splicing 750
group II RNAs (Bonen, 2008). This divergence in sequence and structure has been accompanied 751
by the acquisition of a large number of accessory protein cofactors. All of the plant maturases 752
(i.e. MatR, MatK and the nMATs) act on multiple pre-RNA targets and function in the splicing 753
25
of group II RNAs. Also required are a number of additional (nucleus-encoded) splicing 754
cofactors, possibly acting as an ‘organellar proto-spliceosome’ (Schmitz-Linneweber et al., 755
2015). It is possible that in parallel to the invasion of group II introns into the nucleus of 756
eukaryotes, a general maturase has evolved early during evolution to function in the splicing of 757
many RNA targets in a similar manner to the acquisition of several organellar intron targets by 758
the organellar maturases in plants. 759
Our hypothesis is that the MatR protein is found in the mitochondria in ribonucleoprotein 760
(RNP) particles containing different group II introns and various splicing cofactors. The 761
generalization of the intron targets of MatR makes this protein an interesting model for the 762
evolution of the nuclear spliceosomal machinery, which also underwent a process of splicing-763
target generalization. Interestingly, MatR lacks the N-terminal domain (NTD), which in the case 764
of the bacterial LtrA is required for its association with the DIV domain of the ltrB intron (or 765
possibly to control its own translation, in vivo) (Qu et al., 2016), and also harbors two amino 766
acids sequence insertions within the figure-palm region (Figure 1B). The lack of a NTD 767
subdomain and the presence of additional motifs within the RT (i.e. finger-palm) domain may 768
coincide with the loss of a specific target in parallel to the acquisition of multiple intron RNA 769
targets. Likewise, the Prp8 protein also harbors additional sequence blocks within the fingers-770
palm region of the RT domain, which function in intron binding (Galej et al., 2013; Yan et al., 771
2015; Qu et al., 2016). 772
773
METHODS 774
Plant material and growth conditions 775
Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia (Col-0) seeds were obtained from the ARBC at Ohio 776
State University (Columbus, OH). Prior to germination, seeds of wild-type or matRz/sdhRz 777
transformants were surface-sterilized with bleach (sodium hypochlorite) solution and sown on 778
MS-agar plates containing 1% (w/v) sucrose. The plates were kept in the dark for a few days at 779
4°C and then transferred to controlled temperature and light conditions in growth chambers. 780
Wild-type plants were grown in a controlled environment plant growth chamber (Arabidopsis 781
Chamber AR-41L3, Percival Scientific Inc. Perry, IA) at 22°C with 50% relative humidity, under 782
short day conditions (i.e. 16 hour dark and 8 hour light), at approximately 150 µE·m-2·s-1 s 783
26
(PHILIPS bulbs type F17T8/L841). Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis) inflorescences 784
were purchased fresh at local markets. 785
786
Gene constructs for ribozyme-mediated knockdown of matR 787
Constructs for the expression of the matRz1, matRz2 and sdhRz ribozymes associated with the 788
PKTLS shuttle were prepared by PCR amplification with the large direct primers 789
dirRz1matrXho, dirRz3matrXho and dirRzsdhXho, respectively (Supplemental Table 3). These 790
primers included, from 5' to 3', an Xho I site, the complete sequence of the relevant ribozyme, 791
the linker sequence and nucleotides 100-120 from the 3'-end of the Turnip yellow mosaic virus 792
(TYMV) genomic sequence. The revHDVSpe reverse primer (Supplemental Table 3B) included, 793
from 5' to 3', an SpeI site and the reverse complement to nucleotides 1 to 20 from the 3'-end of 794
the Hepatitis delta virus antigenomic cis-cleaving ribozyme (cHDV) (Perrotta and Been, 1991). 795
The pBI-PSTYPKTLScHDV plasmid (Val et al., 2011), containing the last 186 nucleotides from 796
the 3'-end of the TYMV genomic sequence fused to the sequence of the cHDV cis-ribozyme, 797
was used as a template. The resulting PCR products, encoding the trans-ribozymes combined 798
with the linker, the PKTLS and the cHDV cis-ribozyme, were directly cloned into the pGEM-T 799
vector (Promega) for sequencing, re-excised with the XhoI and SpeI restriction endonucleases 800
and cloned into the XhoI and SpeI sites of the estradiol-inducible transcription unit of the pER8 801
vector (Zuo et al., 2000). Transcription of these constructs by RNA polymerase II yields 5'-802
capped transcripts comprising the matRz1, matRz2 or sdhRz ribozyme, the linker, the PKTLS, 803
the cHDV, the termination sequence and a poly(A) tail. Self-cleavage of the cHDV eliminates 804
the termination sequence and the poly(A) tail and releases the regular 3'-CCA end of the PKTLS. 805
The resulting ribozyme-linker-PKTLS RNA is exported from the nucleus to the cytosol, 806
recognized by the mitochondrial tRNA import machinery and imported into the organelles (Val 807
et al., 2011). 808
809
Nuclear transformation and chimeric ribozyme expression 810
The recombinant pER8 plasmids carrying the ribozyme-linker-PKTLS-cHDV constructs (Figure 811
7 and Supplemental Table 3B) served to transform A. thaliana (Col-0) plants via A. tumefaciens 812
through floral dip (Clough and Bent, 1998). Primary transformants were selected on solid agar 813
medium containing hygromycin. Resistant plants were grown in the greenhouse to the next 814
27
generations and homozygous transformants were selected for further studies. To induce 815
ribozyme expression and matR mRNA knockdown, seedlings were grown on solid agar medium 816
in complete darkness or in long daylight conditions (16 hour light/8 hour dark). In complete dark 817
conditions, the agar medium was overlaid with 5 μM β-estradiol-supplemented liquid medium 818
for transgene induction. In light conditions, the seedlings were transferred to 6-well culture 819
plates containing liquid medium supplemented with estradiol, with the roots dipping into the 820
medium. The matRz1 and matRz2 lines represent two individual transformant lines, expressing 821
the trans-ribozymes designed to specifically cleave the Arabidopsis matR transcript 822
(ArthMp045) in different gene-loci (see Figure 7). The sdh3 line expresses a ribozyme (sdhRz) 823
designed against the mitochondrial sdh3 in Nicotiana tabacum (NitaMp030), which was used as 824
a control for the matR knockdown experiments, since it has no corresponding targets in the 825
Arabidopsis mtDNA (NC_001284). ‘Positive’ transformant lines (i.e. sdh3, matRz1 and matRz2) 826
were further screened based on the lack of obvious phenotypes in the un-induced state, while 827
showing a notable expression levels upon estradiol induction. For the analysis of matR 828
knockdown effects on mitochondrial gene-expression and biogenesis, we selected matRz plants, 829
which showed equivalent levels of transgene (i.e. matRz1 or matRz2) expression to those seen for 830
the sdhRz construct in the sdh3 line. Full biological replicates (i.e., separate experiments) were 831
then run with each selected transformant. We used a transient induction (i.e. 5 ~ 6 days) for the 832
expression of each ribozyme transgene, as estradiol may be metabolized by the plant cells 833
(Janeczko and Skoczowski, 2005). 834
835
RNA extraction and analysis 836
RNA extraction was performed essentially as described previously (Keren et al., 2011; Cohen et 837
al., 2014). In brief, RNA was prepared following standard TRI Reagent protocols (Molecular 838
Research Center) with additional phenol/chloroform extraction. The RNA was treated with 839
RNase-free DNase (Ambion) prior to its use in the assays. RT-qPCR was performed with 840
specific oligonucleotides designed to intron-exon regions (pre-mRNAs) and exon-exon 841
(mRNAs) regions corresponding to the 23 intron-containing mitochondrial transcripts in wild-842
type and matR knockdown (matRz) plants, generally as previously described (Koprivova et al., 843
2010; Kühn et al., 2011). Reverse transcription was carried out with the Superscript III reverse 844
transcriptase (Invitrogen), using 1 - 2 µg of total RNA and 250 ng of a random hexanucleotide 845
28
mixture (Promega) and incubated for 50 min at 50oC. Reactions were stopped by 15 min 846
incubation at 70°C and the RT samples served directly for PCR. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) 847
reactions were run on a LightCycler 480 (Roche), using 2.5 μL of LightCycler 480 SYBR Green 848
I Master mix and 2.5 μM forward and reverse primers in a final volume of 5 µL. Reactions were 849
performed in triplicate in the following conditions: pre-heating at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 850
40 cycles of 10 sec at 95°C, 10 sec at 58°C and 10 sec at 72°C. For the analysis of MatR 851
expression, the nuclear genes ACTIN 2, GAPDH and EXPRESSED were taken as reference 852
genes (Czechowski et al., 2005). For the analysis of mitochondrial gene expression and RNA 853
accumulation, the nucleus-encoded 18S rRNA subunit and the mitochondrial 26S rRNA (rrn26) 854
subunit were used as reference genes in the qPCR analyses (Koprivova et al., 2010; Kühn et al., 855
2011). 856
857
Transcriptome mapping by high-throughput (RNA-seq) analysis 858
Total mt-RNA was extracted from highly enriched mitochondria preparations obtained from 859
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis (cauliflower) inflorescence (see below). Sequencing was carried 860
out on an Illumina Genome Analyzer (The Genome High-Throughput Sequencing Laboratory, 861
Tel-Aviv University, Israel), to generate transcriptome profiles and evaluated by mapping of the 862
B. oleracea mt-RNA sequences onto the genomic reference sequence using bowtie 2.1.0 with 863
default parameters, essentially as described by (Grewe et al., 2014). To reduce mapping of 864
chloroplast transcript reads to MIPT (mitochondrial DNA of plastid origin) regions or putative 865
paralogous mitochondrial genes (e.g. plastid atpA and mitochondrial atp1), we added the 866
Brassica napus chloroplast genome sequence (NC_016735) to the mitochondrial reference 867
sequence as bait for native plastid sequences. Bowtie results in SAM format were aligned using 868
utilities from SAMtools (Li et al., 2009). A custom Perl script was used to determine the depth 869
and direction of transcription at each nucleotide in the reference genome. The expression level of 870
each gene was determined by the average of transcript coverage at each nucleotide. 871
872
Generation of rabbit polyclonal antibodies against the MatR protein 873
Since no antibodies to MatR protein were available prior to this study, a polyclonal antibody was 874
raised against a synthetic peptide corresponding to a unique region in MatR’s RT domain (i.e. 875
29
NH3-RRIDDQENPGEEASFNA), which is conserved among different Brassicales (see 876
Supplemental Figure 1). The antibody was purified from the serum by affinity chromatography 877
column and was then tested for its ability to recognize the immunizing peptide. The affinity and 878
specificity of the purified MatR antibody were further evaluated in protein gel-blots, using total 879
protein and enriched organelle preparations (i.e. mitochondria, chloroplasts and peroxisomes) 880
obtained from 3-week-old Arabidopsis thaliana var. Columbia and purified mitochondria 881
extracted from cauliflower inflorescences. 882
883
RIP-chip assays 884
Mitochondrial preparations from cauliflower inflorescences were solubilized with 1% NP-40 885
(v/v) in assay buffer (150 mM NaCl, 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.2) at a protein 886
concentration of about 1 mg/mL. After 30 min incubation on ice, the organellar extract was 887
centrifuged for 10 min at 21,000 g. The clear supernatant was then incubated with affinity-888
purified anti-MatR antibodies conjugated to protein A/G Sepharose beads (Amersham), with 889
gentle mixing at 4oC for 16 hr. The beads were collected by a brief centrifugation (1 min at 1,000 890
g, at 4oC) and washed three times with 0.6 M NaCl, 0.5% (v/v) NP-40, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 891
8.3), followed by a single wash with 1x PBS buffer. Dot-blot analysis of co-immunoprecipitated 892
RNA was performed essentially as described in (Zoschke et al., 2010). Total mt-RNA co-893
precipitated with the anti-MatR antibodies was DNase digested and then reverse transcribed 894
using Superscript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) and a random hexanucleotide mixture 895
(Promega) in the presence of [α32P]-dCTP and [α32P]-dATP (to increase specific signals). The 896
identity of the proteins in the co-IPs was established by LC-MS/MS analysis (Smoler Proteomics 897
Center, Technion, Israel). Commercial antibodies to SHMT were used as controls for the 898
integrity of the RIP-chip method. 899
900
Mitochondria extraction and analysis 901
Preparations of highly enriched mitochondria from cauliflower inflorescence generally followed 902
the protocol described in detail in (Neuwirt et al., 2005). About 1.0 kg fresh weight 903
inflorescences (two to three heads of cauliflower) were cut off from the stems and kept overnight 904
(about 16 hours) in cold water (4oC). On the following morning, the inflorescences were ground 905
with ice-cold extraction buffer [0.9 M mannitol, 90 mM Na-pyrophosphate, 6 mM EDTA, 2.4% 906
30
PVP25 (w/v), 0.9% BSA (w/v), 9 mM cysteine, 15 mM glycine, and 6 mM β-mercaptoethanol; 907
pH 7.5]. Mitochondria were recovered from the extract by differential centrifugations and 908
purification on Percoll gradients. Following fractionation, the mitochondria were pelleted, 909
resuspended in a small volume of wash buffer (0.3 M mannitol, 10 mM K-phosphate, 1 mM 910
EDTA, pH 7.5), aliquoted and stored frozen at -80oC. For the isolation of mitochondria from 911
Arabidopsis, we used 2-week-old seedlings grown on MS-plates. The enriched organelle 912
preparation was performed essentially as described in (Keren et al., 2012). 913
914
Mitochondrial sub-fractionation into matrix and membranes 915
Intact mitochondria were disrupted by several freeze–thaw cycles in wash buffer (i.e. 0.3 M 916
mannitol, 10 mM KH2PO4, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.5), briefly sonicated and then centrifuged at 917
25,000 g for 20 min to separate the matrix (supernatant) and membrane (pellet) fractions. Wash 918
buffer, equal to the initial volume, was added to the pellet and briefly sonicated. Whole 919
mitochondria and the organellar subfractions were diluted in 1:1 ratio with 3X Laemmli sample 920
loading buffer (Laemmli, 1970) supplemented with 50 mM β-mercaptoethanol, heated at 70°C 921
for 10 min and cleared by centrifugation at 25,000 g for 5 min. To determine whether 922
membranous proteins are peripherally or integrally bound to the membranes, the membrane 923
fraction (equ. of 40 mg leaves) was pre-washed with 200 µl 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0 (for the 924
removal of contaminating proteins) and pelleted by centrifugation for 8 min at 21,000 g (4oC). 925
The membranes were then treated with either 1M NaCl (removes loosely attached membrane 926
proteins), 2M NaBr (a chaotropic agent used for the removal of peripherally-bound proteins), or 927
0.05% Triton X-100, 1M NaCl (wash some peripheral proteins attached by surface hydrophobic 928
interactions), generally as described in (Ostersetzer et al., 2007). The location of each protein 929
(i.e. peripherally or integrally associated) was determined by centrifugation (i.e. 8 min at 21,000 930
g, 4oC) and immunoblot analysis of both the pellet (containing the membranes) and supernatant 931
fractions. 932
933
Protein extraction and analysis 934
Protein extraction and analysis were performed generally as described in (Keren et al., 2009). 935
Total protein was extracted from 3-week-old Arabidopsis leaves or isolated mitochondria 936
31
obtained from cauliflower inflorescences by the borate/ammonium acetate method (Maayan et 937
al., 2008). For this purpose, frozen plant tissue was homogenized in the presence of 938
Polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVPP). The homogenate was added to microfuge tubes containing 939
400 mL ice-cold protein extraction buffer [50 mM Na-borate, 50 mM ascorbic acid, 1.25% (w/v) 940
sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 12.5 mM b-mercaptoethanol, pH 9.0] and the protease inhibitor 941
cocktail ‘complete Mini’ from Roche Diagnostics GmbH (Mannheim, Germany). Proteins were 942
recovered by centrifugation (25,000 g) in the presence of three volumes of ice-cold 0.1 M 943
ammonium acetate in methanol buffer (NH4-OAc-MeOH), generally as described in (Maayan et 944
al., 2008). Protein concentration was determined according to the Bradford method (BioRad), 945
with bovine serum albumin used as a standard. Approximately 20 µg total protein was mixed 946
with an equal volume of 3X protein sample buffer (Laemmli, 1970), supplemented with 50 mM 947
β -mercaptoethanol, and subjected to 12% SDS-PAGE (at a constant 100 V). Following 948
electrophoresis, the proteins were transferred to a PVDF membrane (BioRad) and blotted 949
overnight at 4°C with specific primary antibodies. Detection was carried out by 950
chemiluminescence assays after incubation with an appropriate horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-951
conjugated secondary antibody (Sigma or Santa Cruz). 952
For matRz and sdhRz Arabidopsis transformants, plant samples were weighed, snap 953
frozen in liquid nitrogen and ground in liquid nitrogen with pre-chilled mortar and pestle. The 954
fine frozen powder was transferred to a 1.5 mL microtube and 10 µL extraction buffer [140 mM 955
Tris base, 105 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.0, 0.5 mM EDTA, 2% (w/v) SDS, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 0.1 956
mg/mL protease inhibitors (Roche)] was added per mg sample wet weight. The suspension was 957
immediately re-frozen in liquid nitrogen and sonicated until it was just thawed. The procedure 958
was repeated 3 times with 1 min breaks in liquid nitrogen. The samples were subsequently 959
centrifuged for 3 min at 10,000 g to remove insoluble material and the supernatants were used 960
for protein gel blot analysis. Proteins (50 μg and 5 μ g for MatR and β -actin detection, 961
respectively) were separated on 12.5% (w/v) SDS-PAGE gels and blotted onto PVDF 962
membranes. Immunodetection was carried out with a SNAP 2.0 Protein Detection System 963
(Merck Milllipore), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. MatR was immunoprobed with 964
a polyclonal rabbit antiserum raised against the overexpressed and affinity-purified N-terminal 965
half of the protein. β-actin was detected with a commercial mouse monoclonal antibody (Actin 966
32
MA1-744, ThermoFisher Scientific). Bound specific antibodies were revealed with biotinylated 967
polyclonal anti-rabbit IgG or monoclonal anti-mouse IgG secondary antibodies (Sigma), 968
streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase conjugate (Amersham Biosciences) and FASTTM BCIP/NBT 969
buffer (Sigma). Immunoblot signals were quantified with the MultiGauge software (Fujifilm). 970
971
Seed protein extraction and analysis 972
Total seed protein extracts were prepared from dry mature and viable seeds at different stages of 973
imbibition and germination. About 100 mg Arabidopsis seed [~5,000 seeds; (Meinke, 1994)] 974
was ground with mortar and pestle in the presence of 2 ml extraction buffer [75 mM MOPS-975
KOH, 0.6 M Sucrose, 4 mM EDTA, 0.2% PVP-40, 0.2% BSA, 8 mM L-cystein, pH 7.6] and the 976
protease inhibitor cocktail ‘complete Mini’ from Roche Diagnostics GmbH (Mannheim, 977
Germany). Crude membrane extracts were prepared essentially as described in (Colas des 978
Francs-Small et al., 2012). The membranous fraction was obtained by centrifugation at 22,000 g 979
for 10 min at 4oC. The pellet containing the crude membranous fraction was washed twice with 980
wash buffer [37.5 mM MOPS-KOH, 0.3 M Sucrose, 2 mM EDTA pH 7.6]. The samples were 981
kept frozen at -80°C until used in denaturing (i.e. SDS-PAGE) or Blue native (BN) gel 982
electrophoresis. 983
984
Blue native (BN) electrophoresis for isolation of native organellar complexes 985
Blue native (BN)-PAGE of crude membranous fractions was performed according to the method 986
described by (Zmudjak et al., 2013). An aliquot equivalent to 25 mg of crude membrane extracts, 987
obtained from Arabidopsis thaliana (Col-0) seeds or leaves from 3-week-old seedlings, was 988
solubilized with n-dodecyl-ß-maltoside (1.5% [w/v]) in ACA buffer (750 mM amino-caproic 989
acid, 0.5 mM EDTA, and 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0), and then incubated on ice for 30 min. The 990
samples were centrifuged 8 min at 20,000 g, and Serva Blue G (0.2% [v/v]) was added to the 991
supernatant. The samples were then loaded onto a native 4 to 16% gradient gel. For non-992
denaturing-PAGE-protein gel blotting, the gel was transferred to a PVDF membrane (Bio-Rad) 993
in Cathode buffer (50 mM Tricine and 15 mM Bis-Tris-HCl, pH 7.0) for 16 h at 4°C (const. 40 994
mA). The membrane was incubated with various antibodies, as indicated in each blot, and 995
detection was carried out by chemiluminescence assay after incubation with an appropriate 996
horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody. 997
33
998
Accession numbers 999
Sequence data from this article can be found in the GenBank/EMBL libraries under accession 1000
numbers: Arabidopsis thaliana mitochondria genome sequence (NC_001284); Brassica oleracea 1001
var. botrytis mitochondria genome sequence (KJ820683); Arabidopsis ACTIN2 (At3g18780); 1002
Arabidopsis atp6 (ArthMp035); Arabidopsis atp8 (also annotated as orfB, ArthMp040); 1003
Arabidopsis EXPRESSED (At4g26410); Arabidopsis GADPH (At1g13440); Arabidopsis matR 1004
(ArthMp045); Arabidopsis mitochondrial rRNA subunit 18S protein (At3g41768); Arabidopsis 1005
mitochondrial 26S rRNA (rrn26) subunit (ArthMr001); Nicotiana tabacum sdh3 (NitaMp030); 1006
Turnip yellow mosaic virus (TYMV) genome sequence (X16378). 1007
1008
Supplemental Data 1009
Supplemental Figure 1. Alignment of MatR homologs from various angiosperms. 1010
Supplemental Figure 2. Transcription profile of the nad1 ex4-int4-ex5 gene locus in 1011
cauliflower mitochondria according to RNA-seq analysis. 1012
Supplemental Figure 3. Analysis of matR transcription in Brassicaceae. 1013
Supplemental Figure 4. Identification of MatR-associated mitochondrial RNAs by dot-blot 1014
hybridizations. 1015
Supplemental Figure 5. Expression of intronless mitochondrial mRNAs in matR knockdown 1016
lines. 1017
Supplemental Figure 6. Phenotype of Arabidopsis thaliana transgenic lines expressing the 1018
matRz ribozymes. 1019
Supplemental Figure 7. Accumulation of mitochondrial mRNAs in matR knockdown lines. 1020
Supplemental Figure 8. Homology modeling of the Arabidopsis thaliana maturase related 1021
(MatR) protein. 1022
Supplemental Table 1. List of antibodies used for the analysis of MatR. 1023
Supplemental Table 2. Proteins identified by LC/MS-MS analysis in the RIP-chip assays. 1024
Supplemental Table 3. Lists of oligonucleotides. 1025
Supplemental Table 4. The matR gene status in different angiosperms. 1026
Supplemental File 1. Identification of MatR-associated mitochondrial RNAs by RNA-co-1027
immunoprecipitation/cDNA sequencing. 1028
34
1029
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 1030
We thank Prof. Christian Schmitz-Linneweber (Humboldt University, Berlin) for help with 1031
mitochondria RNA-seq data and dot-blot analysis of RNA co-IPs, Prof. Ian Small (University of 1032
Western Australia) for the assistance with RT-qPCR analyses, Dr. Yoram Eyal (The Volcani 1033
research Inst.) for providing us with the RACE protocols, Amalia Biran-Ostersetzer for the 1034
assistance with mitochondria RNA-seq analysis, Dr. Maciej Szymanski (A. Mickiewicz 1035
University, Poznan) for help in ribozyme design, Dr. Marta Gabryelska (PAN-IBCH, Poznan) 1036
for help in ribozyme testing, Engr. Anne Cosset for help in transformant analysis and Dr. Sam 1037
Aldrin for his careful reading of the manuscript and points raised. This work was supported by 1038
grants to OOB from the Israeli Science Foundation (No. 741/15) and in part from the German-1039
Israeli Foundation (GIF 1213/2012), to AD from the French State program "Investments for the 1040
future" (LABEX ANR-11-LABX-0057_MITOCROSS) and from the French National Research 1041
Agency (ANR-06-MRAR-037-02, ANR-09-BLAN-0240-01), as well as a grant to JB from the 1042
Polish National Science Centre (UMO-2013/09/B/NZ1/03359) and to JPM from the US National 1043
Science Foundation (IOS-1027529 and MCB-1125386). Regular funding to AD from the French 1044
National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS-UPR2357) and the University of Strasbourg is 1045
acknowledged. 1046
1047
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS 1048
L.S. did most of the biochemical analysis of MatR expression and performed co-IPs experiments, 1049
analysis of the RNA profiles of cauliflower and Arabidopsis mitochondria and the analysis of 1050
matR-knockdown lines by RT-qPCR. D.M. was involved in the establishment of matRz 1051
transgenic lines and analysis of the mt-RNA profiles of matR-knockdown lines. F.G. assisted 1052
with the sequencing and analysis of plant mitochondrial genomes and preformed bioinformatics 1053
analysis of mitochondria transcriptomes, intron distribution in angiosperms mtDNAs, and MatR 1054
status in plants. K.R. assisted with the RNA and protein analyses of matR-knockdown lines. S.A. 1055
produced antibodies to MatR and assisted in theRIP-chip analyses of cauliflower mitochondria 1056
MatR protein. P.G. did RNA and RT-qPCR analyses of matR-knockdown lines. A.K.N. 1057
participated in the development of the sdhRz ribozyme system in Arabidopsis and tobacco. I.K. 1058
assisted with the RIP-chip assays and performed hybridization assays of the RIP-chips. S.F. 1059
35
assisted with plant growth and analysis, protein and RNA extraction and analysis. L.K. assisted 1060
with the 3D modeling of MatR structures. J.B. and A.D. were involved in the development of the 1061
mitochondrial ‘ribozyme system’. J.B., J.P.M., A.D. and O.O.B. supervised the study. O.O.B. 1062
finalized the manuscript. 1063
1064
REFERENCES 1065
Adams, K.L., Qiu, Y.-L., Stoutemyer, M., and Palmer, J.D. (2002). Punctuated evolution of 1066 mitochondrial gene content: High and variable rates of mitochondrial gene loss and 1067 transfer to the nucleus during angiosperm evolution. PNAS 99, 9905-9912. 1068
Ahlert, D., Piepenburg, K., Kudla, J., and Bock, R. (2006). Evolutionary origin of a plant 1069 mitochondrial group II intron from a reverse transcriptase/maturase-encoding ancestor. J 1070 Plant Res 119, 363-371. 1071
Aizawa, Y., Xiang, Q., Lambowitz, A.M., and Pyle, A.M. (2003). The pathway for DNA 1072 recognition and RNA integration by a group II intron retrotransposon. Molecular Cell 11, 1073 795-805. 1074
Arrieta-Montiel, M., and Mackenzie, S.A. (2011). Plant Mitochondrial Genomes and 1075 Recombination, in: Advances in Plant Biology, Vol I. Plant Mitochondria (F. Kempken, 1076 ed). Springer Publ. pp. 65-84. 1077
Asakura, Y., and Barkan, A. (2007). A CRM domain protein functions dually in group I and 1078 group II intron splicing in land plant chloroplasts. Plant Cell 19, 3864-3875. 1079
Barkan, A. (2011). Expression of plastid genes: Organelle-specific elaborations on a prokaryotic 1080 scaffold. Plant Physiol 155, 1520-1532. 1081
Begu, D., Mercado, A., Farre, J.C., Moenne, A., Holuigue, L., Araya, A., and Jordana, X. 1082 (1998). Editing status of mat-r transcripts in mitochondria from two plant species: C-to-U 1083 changes occur in putative functional RT and maturase domains. Curr Genet 33, 420-428. 1084
Berg, M., Rogers, R., Muralla, R., and Meinke, D. (2005). Requirement of aminoacyl-tRNA 1085 synthetases for gametogenesis and embryo development in Arabidopsis. Plant J 44, 866-1086 878. 1087
Blocker, F.J.H., Mohr, G., Conlan, L.H., Qi, L., Belfort, M., and Lambowitz, A.M. (2005). 1088 Domain structure and three-dimensional model of a group II intron-encoded reverse 1089 transcriptase. RNA 11, 14-28. 1090
Bock, H., Brennicke, A., and Schuster, W. (1994). Rps3 and rpl16 genes do not overlap in 1091 Oenothera mitochondria: GTG as a potential translation initiation codon in plant 1092 mitochondria? Plant Mol Biol 24, 811-818. 1093
Bonen, L. (2008). Cis- and trans-splicing of group II introns in plant mitochondria. 1094 Mitochondrion 8, 26-34. 1095
Bonen, L., and Vogel, J. (2001). The ins and outs of group II introns. Trends Genet 17, 322-1096 331. 1097
Brown, G.G., Colas des Francs-Small, C., and Ostersetzer-Biran, O. (2014). Group II intron 1098 splicing factors in plant mitochondria. Front Plant Sci 5, 35. 1099
Cech, T.R. (1986). The generality of self-splicing RNA: Relationship to nuclear messenger-1100 RNA splicing. Cell 44, 207-210. 1101
36
Chapdelaine, Y., and Bonen, L. (1991). The wheat mitochondrial gene for subunit I of the 1102 NADH dehydrogenase complex: A trans-splicing model for this gene-in-pieces. Cell 65, 1103 465-472. 1104
Clough, S.J., and Bent, A.F. (1998). Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-1105 mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 16, 735-743. 1106
Cohen, S., Zmudjak, M., Colas des Francs-Small, C., Malik, S., Shaya, F., Keren, I., 1107 Belausov, E., Many, Y., Brown, G.G., Small, I., and Ostersetzer-Biran, O. (2014). 1108 nMAT4, a maturase factor required for nad1 pre-mRNA processing and maturation, is 1109 essential for holocomplex I biogenesis in Arabidopsis mitochondria. The Plant Journal 1110 78, 253-268. 1111
Colas des Francs-Small, C., Kroeger, T., Zmudjak, M., Ostersetzer-Biran, O., Rahimi, N., 1112 Small, I., and Barkan, A. (2012). A PORR domain protein required for rpl2 and ccmFc 1113 intron splicing and for the biogenesis of c-type cytochromes in Arabidopsis mitochondria. 1114 Plant J 69, 996-1005. 1115
Cousineau, B., Smith, D., Lawrence-Cavanagh, S., Mueller, J.E., Yang, J., Mills, D., 1116 Manias, D., Dunny, G., Lambowitz, A.M., and Belfort, M. (1998). Retrohoming of a 1117 bacterial group II intron: Mobility via complete reverse splicing, independent of 1118 homologous DNA recombination. Cell 94, 451-462. 1119
Cui, X.X., Matsuura, M., Wang, O., Ma, H.W., and Lambowitz, A.M. (2004). A group II 1120 intron-encoded maturase functions preferentially In cis and requires both the reverse 1121 transcriptase and X domains to promote RNA splicing. Journal of Molecular Biology 1122 340, 211-231. 1123
Czechowski, T., Stitt, M., Altmann, T., Udvardi, M.K., and Scheible, W.-R. (2005). 1124 Genome-Wide Identification and Testing of Superior Reference Genes for Transcript 1125 Normalization in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 139, 5-17. 1126
Dahan, J., Tcherkez, G., Macherel, D., Benamar, A., Belcram, K., Quadrado, M., Arnal, N., 1127 and Mireau, H. (2014). Disruption of the CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE DEFICIENT1 1128 gene leads to cytochrome c oxidase depletion and reorchestrated respiratory metabolism 1129 in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 166, 1788-1802. 1130
Dalby, S.J., and Bonen, L. (2013). Impact of low temperature on splicing of atypical group II 1131 introns in wheat mitochondria. Mitochondrion 13, 647-655. 1132
Dlakic, M., and Mushegian, A. (2011). Prp8, the pivotal protein of the spliceosomal catalytic 1133 center, evolved from a retroelement-encoded reverse transcriptase. RNA 17, 799-808. 1134
Eyal, Y., Neumann, H., Or, E., and Frydman, A. (1999). Inverse single-strand RACE: an 1135 adapter-independent method of 5' RACE. Biotechniques 27, 656-658. 1136
Farre, J.C., and Araya, A. (1999). The mat-r open reading frame is transcribed from a non-1137 canonical promoter and contains an internal promoter to co-transcribe exons nad1e and 1138 nad5III in wheat mitochondria. Plant Mol Biol 40, 959-967. 1139
Ferat, J.L., and Michel, F. (1993). Group-II Self-Splicing Introns in Bacteria. Nature 364, 358-1140 361. 1141
Forner, J., Weber, B., Thuss, S., Wildum, S., and Binder, S. (2007). Mapping of 1142 mitochondrial mRNA termini in Arabidopsis thaliana: t-elements contribute to 5′ and 3′ 1143 end formation. Nucl Acids Res 35, 3676-3692. 1144
Fromm, S., Senkler, J., Eubel, H., Peterhansel, C., and Braun, H.P. (2016). Life without 1145 complex I: proteome analyses of an Arabidopsis mutant lacking the mitochondrial 1146 NADH dehydrogenase complex. J Exp Bot. 1147
37
Funk, H.T., Berg, S., Krupinska, K., Maier, U.G., and Krause, K. (2007). Complete DNA 1148 sequences of the plastid genomes of two parasitic flowering plant species, Cuscuta 1149 reflexa and Cuscuta gronovii. BMC Plant Biology 7, 45-48. 1150
Galej, W.P., Oubridge, C., Newman, A.J., and Nagai, K. (2013). Crystal structure of Prp8 1151 reveals active site cavity of the spliceosome. Nature 493, 638-643. 1152
Germain, A., Hotto, A.M., Barkan, A., and Stern, D.B. (2013). RNA processing and decay in 1153 plastids. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA 4, 295-316. 1154
Gordon, K., Futterer, J., and Hohn, T. (1992). Efficient initiation of translation at non-AUG 1155 triplets in plant cells. Plant J 2, 809-813. 1156
Grewe, F., Edger, P.P., Keren, I., Sultan, L., Pires, J.C., Ostersetzer-Biran, O., and Mower, 1157 J.P. (2014). Comparative analysis of 11 Brassicales mitochondrial genomes and the 1158 mitochondrial transcriptome of Brassica oleracea. Mitochondrion 19, Part B, 135-143. 1159
Gu, J., Dempsey, S., and Newton, K.J. (1994). Rescue of a maize mitochondrial cytochrome 1160 oxidase mutant by tissue culture. Plant J 6, 787-794. 1161
Gualberto, J.M., Mileshina, D., Wallet, C., Niazi, A.K., Weber-Lotfi, F., and Dietrich, A. 1162 (2014). The plant mitochondrial genome: Dynamics and maintenance. Biochimie 100, 1163 107-120. 1164
Guo, W., and Mower, J.P. (2013). Evolution of plant mitochondrial intron-encoded maturases: 1165 frequent lineage-specific loss and recurrent intracellular transfer to the nucleus. J Mol 1166 Evol 77, 43-54. 1167
Guo, W., Grewe, F., Fan, W., Young, G.J., Knoop, V., Palmer, J.D., and Mower, J.P. 1168 (2016). Ginkgo and Welwitschia Mitogenomes Reveal Extreme Contrasts in 1169 Gymnosperm Mitochondrial Evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 1170
Hammani, K., and Giege, P. (2014). RNA metabolism in plant mitochondria. Trends Plant Sci 1171 19, 380-389. 1172
Hann, S.R. (1994). Regulation and function of non-AUG-initiated proto-oncogenes. Biochimie 1173 76, 880-886. 1174
Hausner, G., Olson, R., Simon, D., Johnson, I., Sanders, E.R., Karol, K.G., McCourt, R.M., 1175 and Zimmerly, S. (2006). Origin and Evolution of the Chloroplast trnK (matK) Intron: A 1176 Model for Evolution of Group II Intron RNA Structures. Molecular Biology and 1177 Evolution 23, 380-391. 1178
Hofacker, I.L., Fekete, M., and Stadler, P.F. (2002). Secondary Structure Prediction for 1179 Aligned RNA Sequences. Journal of Molecular Biology 319, 1059-1066. 1180
Huang, H.-R., Rowe, C.E., Mohr, S., Jiang, Y., Lambowitz, A.M., and Perlman, P.S. (2005). 1181 The splicing of yeast mitochondrial group I and group II introns requires a DEAD-box 1182 protein with RNA chaperone function. PNAS 102, 163-168. 1183
Huang, S., Shingaki-Wells, R.N., Taylor, N.L., and Millar, A.H. (2013). The rice 1184 mitochondria proteome and its response during development and to the environment. 1185 Front Plant Sci 4, 16. 1186
Jacoby, R.P., Millar, A.H., and Taylor, N.L. (2010). Wheat mitochondrial proteomes provide 1187 new links between antioxidant defense and plant salinity tolerance. J Proteome Res 9, 1188 6595-6604. 1189
Janeczko, A., and Skoczowski, A. (2005). Mammalian sex hormones in plants. Folia 1190 histochemica et cytobiologica / Polish Academy of Sciences, Polish Histochemical and 1191 Cytochemical Society 43, 71-79. 1192
38
Jenkins, B.D., Kulhanek, D.J., and Barkan, A. (1997). Nuclear mutations that block group II 1193 RNA splicing in maize chloroplasts reveal several intron classes with distinct 1194 requirements for splicing factors. Plant Cell 9, 283-296. 1195
Jensen, E.C. (2013). Quantitative analysis of histological staining and fluorescence using 1196 ImageJ. Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) 296, 378-381. 1197
Kallberg, M., Wang, H., Wang, S., Peng, J., Wang, Z., Lu, H., and Xu, J. (2012). Template-1198 based protein structure modeling using the RaptorX web server. Nat Protoc 7, 1511-1522. 1199
Keene, J.D., Komisarow, J.M., and Friedersdorf, M.B. (2006). RIP-Chip: the isolation and 1200 identification of mRNAs, microRNAs and protein components of ribonucleoprotein 1201 complexes from cell extracts 1, 302. 1202
Kelley, L.A., and Sternberg, M.J. (2009). Protein structure prediction on the Web: a case study 1203 using the Phyre server. Nat Protoc 4, 363-371. 1204
Keren, I., Shaya, F., and Ostersetzer-Biran, O. (2011). An optimized method for the analysis 1205 of plant mitochondria RNAs by northern-blotting. Endocy Cell Res 1, 34-42. 1206
Keren, I., Tal, L., Colas des Francs-Small, C., Araújo, W.L., Shevtsov, S., Shaya, F., Fernie, 1207 A.R., Small, I., and Ostersetzer-Biran, O. (2012). nMAT1, a nuclear-encoded maturase 1208 involved in the trans-splicing of nad1 intron 1, is essential for mitochondrial complex I 1209 assembly and function. Plant J 71, 413-426. 1210
Keren, I., Bezawork-Geleta, A., Kolton, M., Maayan, I., Belausov, E., Levy, M., Mett, A., 1211 Gidoni, D., Shaya, F., and Ostersetzer-Biran, O. (2009). AtnMat2, a nuclear-encoded 1212 maturase required for splicing of group-II introns in Arabidopsis mitochondria. RNA 15, 1213 2299-2311. 1214
Kim, D.E., Chivian, D., and Baker, D. (2004). Protein structure prediction and analysis using 1215 the Robetta server. Nucleic Acids Res 32, W526-531. 1216
Knoop, V. (2012). Seed Plant Mitochondrial Genomes: Complexity Evolving. In Genomics of 1217 chloroplasts and mitochondria R. Bock and V. Knoop, eds, pp. 175-200. 1218
Köhler, D., Schmidt-Gattung, S., and Binder, S. (2010). The DEAD-box protein PMH2 is 1219 required for efficient group II intron splicing in mitochondria of Arabidopsis thaliana. 1220 Plant Mol Biol 72, 459-467. 1221
Koprivova, A., Colas des Francs-Small, C., Calder, G., Mugford, S.T., Tanz, S., Lee, B.-R., 1222 Zechmann, B., Small, I., and Kopriva, S. (2010). Identification of a pentatricopeptide 1223 repeat protein implicated in splicing of intron 1 of mitochondrial nad7 transcripts. J Biol 1224 Chem 285, 32192-32199. 1225
Kozak, M. (1989). Context effects and inefficient initiation at non-AUG codons in eucaryotic 1226 cell-free translation systems. Molecular and Cellular Biology 9, 5073-5080. 1227
Kozak, M. (1997). Recognition of AUG and alternative initiator codons is augmented by G in 1228 position +4 but is not generally affected by the nucleotides in positions +5 and +6. Embo 1229 j 16, 2482-2492. 1230
Kubo, T., and Newton, K.J. (2008). Angiosperm mitochondrial genomes and mutations. 1231 Mitochondrion 8, 5-14. 1232
Kuhn, K., Obata, T., Feher, K., Bock, R., Fernie, A.R., and Meyer, E.H. (2015). Complete 1233 Mitochondrial Complex I Deficiency Induces an Up-Regulation of Respiratory Fluxes 1234 That Is Abolished by Traces of Functional Complex I. Plant Physiol 168, 1537-1549. 1235
Kühn, K., Carrie, C., Giraud, E., Wang, Y., Meyer, E.H., Narsai, R., Colas des Francs-1236 Small, C., Zhang, B., Murcha, M.W., and Whelan, J. (2011). The RCC1 family 1237
39
protein RUG3 is required for splicing of nad2 and complex I biogenesis in mitochondria 1238 of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 67, 1067-1080. 1239
Laemmli, U.K. (1970). Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of 1240 bacteriophage T4. Nature 227, 680-685. 1241
Lambowitz, A.M., and Belfort, M. (1993). Introns as mobile genetic elements. Annual Review 1242 of Biochemistry 62, 587-622. 1243
Lambowitz, A.M., and Zimmerly, S. (2011). Group II introns: mobile ribozymes that invade 1244 DNA. Perspect Biol 3, 1-19. 1245
Lambowitz, A.M., and Belfort, M. (2015). Mobile Bacterial Group II Introns at the Crux of 1246 Eukaryotic Evolution. Microbiology spectrum 3, 1-26. 1247
Law, S.R., Narsai, R., Taylor, N.L., Delannoy, E., Carrie, C., Giraud, E., Millar, A.H., 1248 Small, I., and Whelan, J. (2012). Nucleotide and RNA metabolism prime translational 1249 initiation in the earliest events of mitochondrial biogenesis during Arabidopsis 1250 germination. Plant Physiol 158, 1610-1627. 1251
Lee, C.P., Eubel, H., Solheim, C., and Millar, A.H. (2012). Mitochondrial proteome 1252 heterogeneity between tissues from the vegetative and reproductive stages of Arabidopsis 1253 thaliana development. J Proteome Res 11, 3326-3343. 1254
Li-Pook-Than, J., Carrillo, C., and Bonen, L. (2004). Variation in mitochondrial transcript 1255 profiles of protein-coding genes during early germination and seedling development in 1256 wheat. Current Genetics V46, 374. 1257
Li, H., Handsaker, B., Wysoker, A., Fennell, T., Ruan, J., Homer, N., Marth, G., Abecasis, 1258 G., Durbin, R., and Subgroup, G.P.D.P. (2009). The Sequence Alignment/Map format 1259 and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078-2079. 1260
Liere, K., Weihe, A., and Börner, T. (2011). The transcription machineries of plant 1261 mitochondria and chloroplasts: Composition, function, and regulation. Journal of Plant 1262 Physiology 168, 1345-1360. 1263
Lobanov, A.V., Turanov, A.A., Hatfield, D.L., and Gladyshev, V.N. (2010). Dual functions 1264 of codons in the genetic code. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 45, 257-265. 1265
Maayan, I., Shaya, F., Ratner, K., Mani, Y., Lavee, S., Avidan, B., Shahak, Y., and 1266 Ostersetzer-Biran, O. (2008). Photosynthetic activity during olive (Olea europaea) leaf 1267 development correlates with plastid biogenesis and Rubisco levels. Physiol Plant 134, 1268 547-558. 1269
Malek, O., Brennicke, A., and Knoop, V. (1997). Evolution of trans-splicing plant 1270 mitochondrial introns in pre-Permian times. Proceedings of the National Academy of 1271 Sciences of the United States of America 94, 553-558. 1272
Marchler-Bauer, A., Derbyshire, M.K., Gonzales, N.R., Lu, S., Chitsaz, F., Geer, L.Y., 1273 Geer, R.C., He, J., Gwadz, M., Hurwitz, D.I., Lanczycki, C.J., Lu, F., Marchler, 1274 G.H., Song, J.S., Thanki, N., Wang, Z., Yamashita, R.A., Zhang, D., Zheng, C., and 1275 Bryant, S.H. (2015). CDD: NCBI's conserved domain database. Nucleic Acids Res 43, 1276 D222-226. 1277
Maréchal, A., and Brisson, N. (2010). Recombination and the maintenance of plant organelle 1278 genome stability. New Phytologist 186, 299-317. 1279
Matsuura, M., Noah, J.W., and Lambowitz, A.M. (2001). Mechanism of maturase-promoted 1280 group II intron splicing. EMBO J 20, 7259-7270. 1281
Meinke, D.W. (1994). Seed Development in Arabidopsis thaliana. In: Meyerowitz EM, 1282 Somerville CR (eds), Arabidopsis. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, pp. 253-295. ( 1283
40
Meyer, E.H., Giegé, P., Gelhaye, E., Rayapuram, N., Ahuja, U., Thöny-Meyer, L., 1284 Grienenberger, J.-M., and Bonnard, G. (2005). AtCCMH, an essential component of 1285 the c-type cytochrome maturation pathway in Arabidopsis mitochondria, interacts with 1286 apocytochrome c. PNAS 102, 16113-16118. 1287
Michel, F., and Ferat, J.L. (1995). Structure and activities of group-II introns. Annu Rev 1288 Biochem 64, 435-461. 1289
Michel, F., Umesono, K., and Ozeki, H. (1989). Comparative and functional anatomy of group 1290 II catalytic introns — a review. Gene 82, 5-30. 1291
Mohr, G., and Lambowitz, A.M. (2003). Putative proteins related to group II intron reverse 1292 transcriptase/maturases are encoded by nuclear genes in higher plants. Nucl Acids Res 1293 31, 647-652. 1294
Mohr, G., Perlman, P.S., and Lambowitz, A.M. (1993). Evolutionary relationships among 1295 group II intron-encoded proteins and identification of a conserved domain that may be 1296 related to maturase function. Nucleic Acids Research 21, 4991-4997. 1297
Mower, J.P., Sloan, D.B., and Alverson, A.J. (2012). Plant mitochondrial genome diversity: 1298 the genomics revolution. In: Plant Genome Diversity Volume 1: Plant Genomes, their 1299 Residents, and their Evolutionary Dynamics. Wendel JF, Greilhuber J, Dolezel J, Leitch 1300 IJ (eds). Springer:Dordrecht. pp 123-144. 1301
Nakagawa, N., and Sakurai, N. (2006). A mutation in At-nMat1a, which encodes a nuclear 1302 gene having high similarity to group II Intron maturase, causes impaired splicing of 1303 mitochondrial nad4 transcript and altered carbon metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana. 1304 Plant Cell Physiol 47, 772-783. 1305
Nelson, C.J., Li, L., and Millar, A.H. (2014). Quantitative analysis of protein turnover in 1306 plants. PROTEOMICS 14, 579-592. 1307
Nelson, C.J., Li, L., Jacoby, R.P., and Millar, A.H. (2013). Degradation Rate of Mitochondrial 1308 Proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana Cells. Journal of Proteome Research 12, 3449-3459. 1309
Neuwirt, J., Takenaka, M., Van Der Merwe, J.A., and Brennicke, A. (2005). An in vitro 1310 RNA editing system from cauliflower mitochondria: Editing site recognition parameters 1311 can vary in different plant species. RNA 11, 1563-1570. 1312
Noah, J.W., and Lambowitz, A.M. (2003). Effects of maturase binding and Mg2+ 1313 concentration on group II intron RNA folding investigated by UV cross-linking. 1314 Biochemistry 42, 12466-12480. 1315
Ostersetzer-Biran, O. (2016). Respiratory complex I and embryo development. J Exp Bot 67, 1316 1205-1207. 1317
Ostersetzer, O., Cooke, A.M., Watkins, K.P., and Barkan, A. (2005). CRS1, a chloroplast 1318 group II intron splicing factor, promotes intron folding through specific interactions with 1319 two intron domains. Plant Cell 17, 241-255. 1320
Ostersetzer, O., Kato, Y., Adam, Z., and Sakamoto, W. (2007). Multiple Intracellular 1321 locations of Lon Protease in Arabidopsis : Evidence for the Localization of AtLon4 to 1322 Chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol. %R 10.1093/pcp/pcm052, pcm052. 1323
Ostheimer, G.J., Williams-Carrier, R., Belcher, S., Osborne, E., Gierke, J., and Barkan, A. 1324 (2003). Group II intron splicing factors derived by diversification of an ancient RNA-1325 binding domain. EMBO J 22, 3919-3929. 1326
Pan, X., Chen, Z., Yang, X., and Liu, G. (2014). Arabidopsis voltage-dependent anion channel 1327 1 (AtVDAC1) is required for female development and maintenance of mitochondrial 1328 functions related to energy-transaction. PLoS One 9, e106941. 1329
41
Park, S., Grewe, F., Zhu, A., Ruhlman, T.A., Sabir, J., Mower, J.P., and Jansen, R.K. 1330 (2015). Dynamic evolution of Geranium mitochondrial genomes through multiple 1331 horizontal and intracellular gene transfers. New Phytol 208, 570-583. 1332
Perrotta, A.T., and Been, M.D. (1991). A pseudoknot-like structure required for efficient self-1333 cleavage of hepatitis delta virus RNA. Nature 350, 434-436. 1334
Petersen, G., Cuenca, A., Moller, I.M., and Seberg, O. (2015). Massive gene loss in mistletoe 1335 (Viscum, Viscaceae) mitochondria. Scientific reports 5, 17588. 1336
Piccirilli, J.A., and Staley, J.P. (2016). Reverse transcriptases lend a hand in splicing catalysis. 1337 Nat Struct Mol Biol 23, 507-509. 1338
Qu, G., Kaushal, P.S., Wang, J., Shigematsu, H., Piazza, C.L., Agrawal, R.K., Belfort, M., 1339 and Wang, H.W. (2016). Structure of a group II intron in complex with its reverse 1340 transcriptase. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 1341
Saldanha, R., Mohr, G., Belfort, M., and Lambowitz, A.M. (1993). Group-I and group-II 1342 introns. FASEB J 7, 15-24. 1343
Saldanha, R., Chen, B., Wank, H., Matsuura, M., Edwards, J., and Lambowitz, A.M. 1344 (1999). RNA and protein catalysis in group II intron splicing and mobility reactions using 1345 purified components. Biochemistry 38, 9069-9083. 1346
Sanchez-Puerta, M.V., Cho, Y., Mower, J.P., Alverson, A.J., and Palmer, J.D. (2008). 1347 Frequent, phylogenetically local horizontal transfer of the cox1 group I Intron in 1348 flowering plant mitochondria. Mol Biol Evol 25, 1762-1777. 1349
Schmitz-Linneweber, C., Williams-Carrier, R., and Barkan, A. (2005). RNA 1350 immunoprecipitation and microarray analysis show a chloroplast pentatricopeptide repeat 1351 protein to be associated with the 5 ' region of mRNAs whose translation it activates. Plant 1352 Cell 17, 2791-2804. 1353
Schmitz-Linneweber, C., Lampe, M.-K., Sultan, L.D., and Ostersetzer-Biran, O. (2015). 1354 Organellar maturases: A window into the evolution of the spliceosome. Biochimica et 1355 Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics. 1356
Schmitz-Linneweber, C., Williams-Carrier, R.E., Williams-Voelker, P.M., Kroeger, T.S., 1357 Vichas, A., and Barkan, A. (2006). A pentatricopeptide repeat protein facilitates the 1358 trans-splicing of the maize chloroplast rps12 Pre-mRNA. Plant Cell 18, 2650-2663. 1359
Shingaki-Wells, R., Millar, A.H., Whelan, J., and Narsai, R. (2014). What happens to plant 1360 mitochondria under low oxygen? An omics review of the responses to low oxygen and 1361 re-oxygenation. Plant Cell Environ. 1362
Siculella, L., Pacoda, D., Treglia, S., Gallerani, R., and Ceci, L.R. (1996). GTG as translation 1363 initiation codon in the apocytochrome b gene of sunflower mitochondria. DNA sequence 1364 : the journal of DNA sequencing and mapping 6, 365-369. 1365
Singh, R.N., Saldanha, R.J., D'Souza, L.M., and Lambowitz, A.M. (2002). Binding of a 1366 group II intron-encoded reverse transcriptase/maturase to its high affinity intron RNA 1367 binding site involves sequence-specific recognition and autoregulates translation. J Mol 1368 Biol 318, 287-303. 1369
Skippington, E., Barkman, T.J., Rice, D.W., and Palmer, J.D. (2015). Miniaturized 1370 mitogenome of the parasitic plant Viscum scurruloideum is extremely divergent and 1371 dynamic and has lost all nad genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1372 112, E3515-E3524. 1373
42
Sloan, D., Alverson, A., Chuckalovcak, J., Wu, M., McCauley, D., Palmer, J., and Taylor, 1374 D. (2012). Rapid evolution of enormous, multichromosomal genomes in flowering plant 1375 mitochondria with exceptionally high mutation rates. PLoS Biol 10, e1001241. 1376
Small, I. (2013). Mitochondrial genomes as living 'fossils'. BMC Biology 11, 30. 1377 Small, I.D., and Peeters, N. (2000). The PPR motif - a TPR-related motif prevalent in plant 1378
organellar proteins. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 25, 45. 1379 Small, I.D., Rackham, O., and Filipovska, A. (2013). Organelle transcriptomes: products of a 1380
deconstructed genome. Current Opinion in Microbiology 16, 652-658. 1381 Stern, D.B., Goldschmidt-Clermont, M., and Hanson, M.R. (2010). Chloroplast RNA 1382
Metabolism. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 61, 125-155. 1383 Taylor, N.L., Heazlewood, J.L., and Millar, A.H. (2011). The Arabidopsis thaliana 2-D gel 1384
mitochondrial proteome: Refining the value of reference maps for assessing protein 1385 abundance, contaminants and post-translational modifications. Proteomics 11, 1720-1386 1733. 1387
Thomson, M.C., Macfarlane, J.L., Beagley, C.T., and Wolstenholme, D.R. (1994). RNA 1388 editing of mat-r transcripts in maize and soybean increases similarity of the encoded 1389 protein to fungal and bryophyte group-II intron maturases - evidence that mat-r encodes a 1390 functional protein. Nucl Acids Res 22, 5745-5752. 1391
Toor, N., Hausner, G., and Zimmerly, S. (2001). Coevolution of group II intron RNA 1392 structures with their intron-encoded reverse transcriptases. RNA 7, 1142-1152. 1393
Townley-Tilson, W.H.D., Pendergrass, S.A., Marzluff, W.F., and Whitfield, M.L. (2006). 1394 Genome-wide analysis of mRNAs bound to the histone stem-loop binding protein. RNA, 1395 rna.76006. 1396
Unseld, M., Marienfeld, J.R., Brandt, P., and Brennicke, A. (1997). The mitochondrial 1397 genome of Arabidopsis thaliana contains 57 genes in 366,924 nucleotides. Nature Genet 1398 15, 57-61. 1399
Uyttewaal, M., Mireau, H., Rurek, M., Hammani, K., Arnal, N., Quadrado, M., and Gieg1400 ,י P. (2008). PPR336 is associated with polysomes in plant mitochondria. Journal of 1401 Molecular Biology 375, 626-636. 1402
Val, R., Wyszko, E., Valentin, C., Szymanski, M., Cosset, A., Alioua, M., Dreher, T.W., 1403 Barciszewski, J., and Dietrich, A. (2011). Organelle trafficking of chimeric ribozymes 1404 and genetic manipulation of mitochondria. Nucleic Acids Research 39, 9262-9274. 1405
Vaughn, J.C., Mason, M.T., Sper-Whitis, G.L., Kuhlman, P., and Palmer, J.D. (1995). 1406 Fungal origin by horizontal transfer of a plant mitochondrial group I intron in the 1407 chimeric CoxI gene of Peperomia. J Mol Evol 41, 563-572. 1408
Wahleithner, J.A., MacFarlane, J.L., and Wolstenholme, D.R. (1990). A sequence encoding 1409 a maturase-related protein in a group II intron of a plant mitochondrial nad1 gene. PNAS 1410 87, 548-552. 1411
Wank, H., SanFilippo, J., Singh, R.N., Matsuura, M., and Lambowitz, A.M. (1999). A 1412 reverse transcriptase/maturase promotes splicing by binding at its own coding segment in 1413 a group II intron RNA. Mol Cell 4, 239-250. 1414
Watkins, K.P., Kroeger, T.S., Cooke, A.M., Williams-Carrier, R.E., Friso, G., Belcher, S.E., 1415 van Wijk, K.J., and Barkan, A. (2007). A ribonuclease III domain protein functions in 1416 group II intron splicing in maize chloroplasts. Plant Cell 19, 2606-2623. 1417
Wicke, S., Müller, K.F., de Pamphilis, C.W., Quandt, D., Wickett, N.J., Zhang, Y., Renner, 1418 S.S., and Schneeweiss, G.M. (2013). Mechanisms of Functional and Physical Genome 1419
43
Reduction in Photosynthetic and Nonphotosynthetic Parasitic Plants of the Broomrape 1420 Family. Plant Cell 25, 3711-3725. 1421
Wurdack, K.J., and Davis, C.C. (2009). Malpighiales phylogenetics: Gaining ground on one of 1422 the most recalcitrant clades in the angiosperm tree of life. Am. J. Bot. 96, 1551-1570. 1423
Yan, C., Hang, J., Wan, R., Huang, M., Wong, C.C., and Shi, Y. (2015). Structure of a yeast 1424 spliceosome at 3.6-angstrom resolution. Science 349, 1182-1191. 1425
Zhao, C., and Pyle, A.M. (2016). Crystal structures of a group II intron maturase reveal a 1426 missing link in spliceosome evolution. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 1427
Zhu, A., Guo, W., Jain, K., and Mower, J.P. (2014). Unprecedented heterogeneity in the 1428 synonymous substitution rate within a plant genome. Mol Biol Evol 31, 1228-1236. 1429
Zimmerly, S., and Semper, C. (2015). Evolution of group II introns. Mobile DNA 6, 1-19. 1430 Zimmerly, S., Hausner, G., and Wu, X.C. (2001). Phylogenetic relationships among group II 1431
intron ORFs. Nucleic Acids Res 29, 1238-1250. 1432 Zmudjak, M., Colas des Francs-Small, C., Keren, I., Shaya, F., Belausov, E., Small, I., and 1433
Ostersetzer-Biran, O. (2013). mCSF1, a nucleus-encoded CRM protein required for the 1434 processing of many mitochondrial introns, is involved in the biogenesis of respiratory 1435 complexes I and IV in Arabidopsis. New Phytol 199, 379-394. 1436
Zoschke, R., Ostersetzer-Biran, O., Börner, T., and Schmitz-Linneweber, C. (2009). 1437 Analysis of the regulation of MatK gene expression. Endocytobiosis Cell Res. 19, 127-1438 135. 1439
Zoschke, R., Nakamura, M., Liere, K., Sugiura, M., Börner, T., and Schmitz-Linneweber, 1440 C. (2010). An organellar maturase associates with multiple group II introns. PNAS 107, 1441 3245-3250. 1442
Zuker, M. (2003). Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucl. 1443 Acids Res. 31, 3406-3415. 1444
Zuo, J., Niu, Q.-W., and Chua, N.-H. (2000). An estrogen receptor-based transactivator XVE 1445 mediates highly inducible gene expression in transgenic plants. Plant J 24, 265-273. 1446
1447 1448 Table 1. List of identified group II intron targets of MatR protein in Brassicales 1449
1450
Gene / Intron configuration chips-RIP matRknockdowns
matR
i1 rpl2 cis + +
i1 rps3 cis + +
i1 cox2 cis - +
i1 ccmFc cis - +
i1 nad1 trans + -
44
i2 nad1 cis (1)(+) -
i3 nad1 trans + +
i4 nad1 cis + +
i1 nad2 cis (+) -
i2 nad2 trans (+) -
i3 nad2 cis - -
i4 nad2 cis - (+)
i1 nad4 cis (+) -
i2 nad4 cis (+) -
i3 nad4 cis - (+)
i1 nad5 cis - -
i2 nad5 trans - -
i3 nad5 trans + (+)
i4 nad5 cis + +
i1 nad7 cis - -
i2 nad7 cis + +
i3 nad7 cis - -
i4 nad7 cis - -
1451 1452
1 Brackets indicate the data that could not be fully supported by the RIP-chip assays or the matR-1453 knockdown experiments. 1454
DOI 10.1105/tpc.16.00398; originally published online October 19, 2016;Plant Cell
Dietrich and Oren OstersetzerAdnan Khan Niazi, Ido keren, Sofia Shevtsov, Liron Klipcan, Jan Barciszewski, Jeffrey P Mower, Andre Laure D Sultan, Daria Mileshina, Felix Grewe, Katarzyna Rolle, Sivan Abudraham, Pawel Glodowicz,
II introns in Brassicaceae mitochondriaThe reverse-transcriptase/RNA-maturase protein MatR is required for the splicing of various group
This information is current as of January 13, 2020
Supplemental Data /content/suppl/2016/10/19/tpc.16.00398.DC1.html
Permissions https://www.copyright.com/ccc/openurl.do?sid=pd_hw1532298X&issn=1532298X&WT.mc_id=pd_hw1532298X
eTOCs http://www.plantcell.org/cgi/alerts/ctmain
Sign up for eTOCs at:
CiteTrack Alerts http://www.plantcell.org/cgi/alerts/ctmain
Sign up for CiteTrack Alerts at:
Subscription Information http://www.aspb.org/publications/subscriptions.cfm
is available at:Plant Physiology and The Plant CellSubscription Information for
ADVANCING THE SCIENCE OF PLANT BIOLOGY © American Society of Plant Biologists