Supporting further and higher education
Effective Practice in e-learning
Sarah KnightProgramme Manager,
JISC Development Group
Supporting further and higher education
Key Questions
• How can we enhance current knowledge about what constitutes ‘effective’ practice in e-learning?
• How can we support practitioners with their developments in the use of e-learning?
• How can we promote the development of terminology that will improve understanding and sharing of practice in e-learning?
• What are the current approaches to the design of e-learning activities and how can these be developed in the future to ensure that we are using sound pedagogical models?
Supporting further and higher education
e-learning Programme
• JISC works with post-16 and higher education by providing strategic guidance, advice and opportunities to use ICT to support teaching, learning, research and administration.
• The JISC Committee for Learning and Teaching (JCLT) is funding a new e-learning Programme to run until August 2007.
• The overarching aim of the e-learning Programme is to identify how e-learning might be used to facilitate and support learning and to advise on how these approaches might be effectively implemented.
• The Programme focuses on four areas: e-learning and Pedagogy; Technical Frameworks for e-learning; Innovation and Distributed e-learning.
Supporting further and higher education
Some Definitions
• Communities across post-16 and HE:– Practitioners – whose role it is to support, facilitate and
direct student learning– ILT Champions, e-Guides, educational developers and
learning technologists– Staff Developers– Researchers into learning and e-learning– Developers of e-learning related software, systems and
standards
• E-learning – learning facilitated and supported through the use of ICT
Supporting further and higher education
A view of e-learning
A Model of e-learning and e-living, Killen, Davies and Smith, adapted
from the e-learning Fan, B Powell/J Scribbins,
Demonstrating Transformation, http://ferl.becta.org.uk/fpp6
Supporting further and higher education
Effective e-learning?
• Relevance• Accessible• Fun• Interactive• Engaging• Range of materials• Stimulate• Encourage feedback• Motivate
• Enthusiastic teachers and receptive learners
• Encourage communication – peer-2-peer and peer-2-tutor
• Work at own pace• Differentiation• Individualised
learning
…or effective learning?
Supporting further and higher education
e-learning and Pedagogy
• Overall aim: to ensure that e-learning as practised in UK post-16 and Higher Education is ‘pedagogically sound, learner-focused and accessible’.
• What this means in practice:– To provide the post-16 and HE community with
accurate, up-to-date, evidence- and research-based information about effective practice in the use of e-learning tools.
– To promote the application and development of e-learning tools and standards to better support effective practice.
• Practical outcomes which are relevant to practitioners, researchers and developers.
Supporting further and higher education
Two related themes• Designing for Learning (Practitioner focus):
– Models of learning and e-learning• practitioner planning perspective
– Understanding and moving on practice– Case studies of effective practice (14-19, FE, HE,
ACL)– Evaluating learning design tools
• e.g. Coppercore, Eduplone, LAMS, mindmapping…– Practitioner consultation (14-19, FE, HE, ACL)
• Understanding my learning (Learner focus):– Models of learning and e-learning
• learner perspective and learner differences– Exploring the potential of e-portfolios– Mapping effective assessment for e-learning– Peer learning, collaboration and vicarious learning – Learner consultation (14-19, FE, HE, ACL)
Supporting further and higher education
Models of learning and e-learning
• Explore how different approaches to (e)learning can be represented and shared.
• Develop a general framework within which approaches can be evaluated and compared.
• Model/represent a limited number of approaches within this framework
• Provide tools to evaluate these approaches in specific learning contexts
• Advice and guidance for practitioners on effective use of e-learning
Supporting further and higher education
Understanding and moving on practice
• Explore how practitioners make effective choices about e-learning
• Develop an understanding of how different resources support practitioners, e.g.– Case studies, examples, ‘stories’, video-clips– Guidelines, staff development materials– Tools (e.g. LAMS) and toolkits/planners– Practices e.g. mentoring, workshops
• Investigate which are effective in practice:– Broad (e.g. survey, review of existing materials) – Deep (e.g. interviews, personal case histories)
• Influence the way in which information/advice and guidance from the e-learning Programme is disseminated
Supporting further and higher education
… potential outcomes– lesson plans/learning designs for different environments– representations (e.g. video) of different approaches in use– an e-learning planning tool– a database of activities indexed to specific learning
outcomes, contexts, or needs– re-usable ‘activity sequences’ e.g. for use in a LAMS-type
environment– an online ‘knowledge garden’ in which participants
contribute, refine and link e-learning concepts– materials for use in staff development, e.g. integrated into
FPP modules – publication ‘Effective Practice in e-learning’ with supporting
video clips for October 2004– development of more effective learning design tools and
standards– new digital library functions and services– …
Supporting further and higher education
Case studies of effective practice
• Describe and evaluate a range of different approaches to e-learning:
• in a range of organisational contexts:– 14-19, FE, ACL and HE– Blended, face to face and virtual
• using a range of technical environments:– specific uses of Virtual Learning Environments – use of Learning Design tools (e.g LAMS, ReLOAD)– use of modular tools (e.g. simulations, scenarios,
activities, discipline-specific tools…)
• Publication ‘Effective Practice in e-learning’ with supporting video clips – for October 2004.
Supporting further and higher education
Further evaluation studies
• Further evaluated case studies – different technologies and contexts
• Review of existing case study resources– build links with repositories, e.g Ferl, Jorum
• Regional workshops on ‘Designing for Learning’• Evaluation of learning design tools, e.g. LAMS
– usability– learner impact– effective sharing of designs and approaches
• Learner consultation – towards the second theme, ‘Understanding my Learning’
Supporting further and higher education
Practitioner consultation
• Opportunities to participate – through the experts’ working group– through consultation exercises (see delegates’ pack)– through workshops and focus groups (forthcoming)
• Impact on programme– Feedback on outcomes of individual projects and
studies– Interpreting outcomes and developing
recommendations– Identifying priorities– Building links with other ongoing work– Taking part in further studies
Supporting further and higher education
Activity
• What are the key ingredients for effective (i.e. pedagogically sound)e-learning?
• Give an example of effective e-learning in your community
• 3 Priorities for the e-learning and Pedagogy Programme
Supporting further and higher education
Designing for Learning
Helen BeethamConsultant, e-Learning and Pedagogy
http://www.jisc.ac.uk/elearning_pedagogy.html
Supporting further and higher education
What do we mean by…
• Designing for learning (broad term)?– Designing, coordinating, planning, orchestrating
and managing learning tasks as part of a learning session or programme
– A ‘practitioner planning’ view on a learning situation, e.g. resulting in a lesson plan or a LAMS design
• Learning Design (narrow term)?– A new IMS specification for sequences of interaction
between learners and system components (compare LOM for content, PDPs/LR for learner data)
– A sequence of interactions specified according to LD
Does ‘Learning Design’ in this narrow sense provide a good framework for understanding and supporting the process of ‘Designing for Learning’?
Supporting further and higher education
Why the interest inlearning design?
• Widespread adoption of designed, standards-based learning environments and tools – Pedagogical issues… appear to have been of
secondary concern until now. JISC/UCISA (2003)– First generation VLEs do not obviously support
innovative or diverse learning activities… [They are] strongly based around information transmission .. with little consideration given to the activities that the learners themselves might engage inBritain and Liber (2004)
• Convergence of pedagogical research and practitioner education around ideas of– learner-centredness, ‘active’, constructive learners,
outcomes-based teaching with emphasis on relevant tasks
Supporting further and higher education
Why the interest inlearning design?
• Practitioner demand (from consultation):– ‘curriculum design’, ‘practical examples of learning
activities’, ‘designing activities within VLEs’ – (note the popularity of Salmon’s (2003) e-tivities)– ‘a means of describing practice’, ‘a means of
mapping theory onto practice’ ‘a means of mapping activities onto outcomes’, ‘a common set of terms for all of this’
• E-learning strategy:– Engaging teachers and lecturers through simple e-
learning design tools would bring them closer to experimenting with pedagogical design DfES (2003)
Supporting further and higher education
What is effective practice in designing for learning?
• a process that is acceptable to practitioners, i.e.– supports or enhances their approach to learning– makes acceptable demands on their time and skills
• effective outcomes for learners, i.e.– planned learning outcomes are achieved and/or– the learner experience (motivation, participation,
enjoyment, collaboration) is enhanced
• a means of sharing (and reflecting on?) practice – e.g. through sharable sequences, ‘designs’ etc– or through more explicit representation of practice
Supporting further and higher education
Key tasks (from Review: e-learning models)• Define a range of practice models, i.e. distinct but
comparable approaches among which practitioners, working in a specific context, can make an informed choice.
• Ensure any framework or terminology has recognition and usability in the practitioner communities
• Consider theoretical (explanatory) models insofar as these provide general frameworks for discussing, comparing and evaluating practice models (especially in relation to learner experience).
• Map practice models to technical standards and specifications to ensure that future systems are compatible with the needs of learners and teachers.
• Evaluate tools to support designing for learning• Focus on learning activity/task as the basic unit of
modelling:– fits with conclusions from UKeU, CANDLE, Dialog+ and
work at the OU (eLTN)
Developing models and frameworks
apply
specific instances of e-learning in context
Building case studies
Descriptive framework(modelling tool)
refinegenerate
Models/descriptions of different approaches
Evaluation framework (evaluation tool)
applydescribe
evaluate
Evaluated and enriched models/
descriptions
Framework with
examples of effective practice
analyse review collate evaluate
Practitioner consultation & needs analysis
Designing for Learning (1)
Reviewing interventions in practice
Designing for Learning (2)
Researching/evaluating interventions
Review of resources, toolkits and guidance
Research into effectiveness of
different interventions
define elaborate
Review of learning design tools
Series of evaluations of
tools in use
support develop evaluate
Framework with
examples of effective practice
Tools, resources & standards to
support & communicate
effective practice
develop
recommend
Supporting further and higher education
Outcomes to date
• Review of e-learning models• Review of learning design tools • Consultation events and online forum (eped-
experts) • Draft framework for planning e-learning
approaches and activities– completion by end July
• Draft framework for ‘moving on practice’– completion by end July
• Case studies and video case studies – published October
• LAMS evaluation programme– outline available: training begins 7th July
• Recommendations, and refined research/ development programme– ongoing
Supporting further and higher education
Key issues in designing for learning
• Is ‘learning activity’ the best focus of e-learning research and development?
• How should we describe, differentiate and share (e-)learning activities?– Need for a common framework of description
• How do practitioners currently conceive and plan (e-)learning activities?– What tools, resources and opportunities for dialogue
do they have? – What tools, resources etc are most effective?
• Which approaches to designing for learning are effective in which learning contexts?
• Does the LD specification offer:– a good fit with definitions of learning activity used by
learners, practitioners and theorists?– a sound basis for design of supporting systems?
Activity‘interaction of learner
with environment, leading to planned
outcome’
Knowledge represented in specific media and formats; skills facilitated through specific tools; impact of learning environments on the meaning of knowledge and skills
Prior subject knowledge and
skills of learner(s), prior
conceptions, motivation to
achieve specific outcomes, match
of style/ approach to
content
Prior experience of learner(s) with tools, environments, services; match of learning style and approach to affordances of learning environment
Environmentavailable tools,
facilities, services, resources,
environments etc
Learner(s)needs, motives, prior
experience of learning, social and interpersonal skills,
learning styles and approaches
Outcomesubject/discipline area, target knowledge/ skills
A specification for learning activities (H.Beetham, Feb ‘04)
Supporting further and higher education
Further information
www.jisc.ac.uk/elearning_pedagogy.html