Ple
ase
note
that
this
is a
n au
thor
-pro
duce
d P
DF
of a
n ar
ticle
acc
ept
ed fo
r pu
blic
atio
n fo
llow
ing
peer
rev
iew
. The
def
initi
ve p
ub
lish
er-a
uthe
ntic
ated
ve
rsio
n is
ava
ilab
le o
n th
e pu
blis
her
Web
site
1
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems December 2008 ; Volume 9 (12) : Pages 1-13 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GC001845 © 2008 American Geophysical Union An edited version of this paper was published by AGU.
Archimer http://www.ifremer.fr/docelec/ Archive Institutionnelle de l’Ifremer
Subseafloor stratigraphic profiling and soil classification from piezocone tests: A case study in the Gulf of Lion (NW Mediterranean Sea)
S. Lafuerza1, J. Frigola1, M. Canals1, *, G. Jouet2, M. Bassetti3, N. Sultan2 and S. Berné2, 3
1 GRC Geociències Marines, Departament d’Estratigrafia, Paleontologia i Geociències Marines, Universitat de Barcelona, Martí i Franquès s/n, 08028 Barcelona, Spain 2 Institut Français de Recherche pour l’Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER), BP 70, 29280 Plouzané, France 3 Université de Perpignan IMAGES, 52 avenue Paul Alduy, Perpignan, France *: Corresponding author : M. Canals, email address : [email protected]
Abstract: We show the results provided by piezocone tests in determining the stratigraphic profile and the soil classification of two drilling sites in the outer shelf and the upper slope of the Gulf of Lion, PRGL2 and PRGL1, respectively. Correlations with grain-size data indicate that sleeve friction can be used for profiling fine-grained sediments (site PRGL1), whereas cone tip resistance is the most adequate for sequences made of alternations of coarse- and fine-grained intervals (site PRGL2). Normalized cone resistance and friction ratio proved to be also appropriate for soil stratigraphy as it depicts trends in the coarse fraction of the tested soil. Silts and clays present in similar proportions at site PRGL1 responded to piezocone testing as pure clays usually do. Consequently, classical soil classification methods resulted in erroneous interpretation of these sediments as clays, whereas classification of the heterogeneous deposits at PRGL2 was consistent with the grain size. When tied to a high-resolution seismic reflection profile, the stratigraphy interpreted from the piezocone profile matches with the main seismic sequences and discontinuities defined from seismic stratigraphy analysis. Graded bedding also matches with cone tip resistance and sleeve friction data. Keywords: piezocone; stratigraphy; soil classification; Gulf of Lion 1. Introduction [2] The EC funded “Profiles Across Mediterranean Sedimentary Systems 1” (PROMESS 1) research project was designed to obtain very long sediment cores and perform in situ physical measurements from two continental margins in the Mediterranean Sea [Berné et al., 2004a]. In the Gulf of Lion, drilling and in situ testing were carried out at two sites: PRGL1 in the upper slope at 298 m of water depth (mwd) and PRGL2 in the outer shelf at 103 mwd (Figure 1). Five boreholes were drilled at site PRGL1 site (PRGL1_1 to PRGL1_5) and two at site PRGL2 (PRGL2_1 and PRL2_2). In this technical brief we compare the stratigraphic profile and soil type classification interpreted from piezocone measurements performed at sites PRGL1_3 and PRGL2_1 with grain size data acquired from sediment cores at PRGL1_4 and PRGL2_2 and with high-resolution seismic reflection profiles. The aim of this study is to illustrate the advantages of piezocone tests for (1) soil classification and stratigraphic profiling of marine sediments before drilling and (2) for the lithostratigraphic interpretation of seismic reflection profiles.
3
2. Materials and methods
Piezocone tests (CPTU) were performed using a down-hole cone penetration system that enable
CPTU from the base of the borehole in sites PRGL1_3 and PRGL2_1, reaching penetration
depths of 150 and 100 mbsf, respectively. The down-hole system latches into the lower end of a
drill pipe by applying mud pressure in the borehole, while down-hole data are recorded. The
system requires a drilling apparatus for advancing the borehole and a bottom hole assembly that
permits latching the thrust machine, of 90 kN capacity. The maximum stroke of the thrust
machine is 3 m. This system enables the borehole to be advanced and CPTUs be performed at
every depth. Direct measurements of cone tip resistance (qc), sleeve friction (fs) and pore
pressure (u2) were recorded at a constant penetration rate of 2cm·s-1. CPTU were performed
before drilling for coring providing a reliable lithostratigraphic profile.
Derived parameters from CPTU, such as the normalized cone resistance (Qt), the friction ratio
(FR) and the pore pressure ratio (Bq) (see Notations), allow the identification of the soil type
using the soil classification charts proposed by Robertson (1990) and Ramsey (2002). Both
methods define nine soil classes according to Qt/FR and Qt/Bq ratios but numbers are referred to
soil classes distinctly (Figs. 2 and 3). Changes in profiles of qc, fs, have been followed for
delineating the stratigraphic profile and the ratio of Qt/FR for correlating with grain size curves.
qc and Qt respond to variations in the resistance generated by the coarse fraction whereas fs and
FR illustrate changes in the cohesive fraction, which usually corresponds to the fine-grained
fraction (Lunne et al., 1997).
The total sediment core recovery from PRGL1_4 and PRGL2_2 was 300 and 100 m,
respectively. Grain-size analyses were carried out in both the bulk and the carbonate free
fractions using a Laser Particle Sizer (LPS) Coulter LS100 at PRGL1_4 (Frigola et al., 2008
personal communication) and a LSP Coulter LS230 at PRGL2_2 (Bassetti et al., this issue).
Since laser diffraction methods are claimed to underestimate plate-shaped clay mineral
percentages, we consider the clay-silt limit at 8μm following the method proposed by Konert
and Vandenberghe (1997). The particle sizes considered are: (i) clays with diameter (φ) between
0 and 8 µm; (ii) silts with 8<φ<63 µm and (iii) sands with φ > 63 µm.
Geotechnical stratigraphy derived from CPTU was correlated with the seismic stratigraphy
established by several authors. Six seismic sequences (S0 to S5), corresponding to 100 ky
glacial-interglacial cycles, are bounded by major erosion surfaces (D30 to D70) (Berné et al.,
2004a and this issue; Rabineau et al., 1998 and 2005). Within the last sequence (S5), other
relevant secondary unconformities (D65, D64, D63 and D61) are identified (Jouet et al., 2006
and see review by Bassetti et al., this issue).
4
3. Results
3.1. CPTU tests at PRGL1 site
At PRGL1_3 the cone tip resistance, qc, and the pore water pressure, u2, increase quasi-linearly
with depth, whereas the sleeve friction, fs, depicts a more variable profile (Fig. 4). Note that the
three-m-spaced negative peaks in u2 curves are losses in CPTU readings, and therefore, are
unrelated to soil type changes. Five geotechnical-stratigraphic units were identified based fs
values trend. These units have been numbered from I to V from top to bottom. Subunits are
identified by alphabetical subindexes (Fig. 4). Soil classifications charts in Figures 2 and 3
predict that the geotechnical unit I consists of silty clays and clays whereas units from II to V
are uniformly made by clays. Figure 4 shows the soil type based on the Qt/FR chart from
Robertson’s (Fig. 2) at corresponding depths.
Correlation of Qt/FR and grain-size profiles illustrates the correspondence between Qt/FR and
the silt/clay ratio (Fig. 5), supporting the sedimentological interpretation of the soil classes in
Figures 2 and 3. Furthermore, unit boundaries (red dotted lines, Figs. 4 and 5) correspond to
marked decreases in clay content accompanied by an evident increase in sand fraction, as
observed by increases in Qt/FR. The coincidence of these sharp changes with the end of CPTU
sequences suggests those unit boundaries at 36 and 72 mbsf can be located within units IIb and
IIId, respectively. In these levels and to a lesser extent at IVd, pronounced positive peaks in
Qt/FR correspond to sand content augmentations (Fig. 5). Main changes in the clay fraction,
such as those in subunits IIb, IIId and IVd are clearly identified from the fs profile (Fig. 6). The
inverse variation between Qt/FR and the clay fraction supports the clay-dependence of FR and
fs, as well as the silt dependence of Qt. This, in addition, confirms the 8 µm size as an adequate
clay-silt limit for laser grain-size measurements.
3.2. CPTU tests at PRGL2 site
In PRGL2, five geotechnical-stratigraphic units are identified based on changes in qc (Fig. 7)
and named 1 to 5 from top to bottom, and subdivided using alphabetically ordered subindexes.
qc and fs curves are highly similar, with relative high values for sands (from 0 to 28.6 mbsf and
from 67 to the borehole bottom) and relative low values in clays (from 28.6 to 68 mbsf and from
78.3 to 82.3 mbsf) (Fig. 8). Zero u2 values through the upper 30 meters and negative values at
the borehole bottom are attributed to readings in sands affected by cavitation processes (Lunne
et al., 1997). Soil types based on the Qt/FR chart from Robertson classification at corresponding
depths are also shown in Figure 7. The good correlation between the sand content profile and
Qt/FR profile supports geotechnical stratigraphy for site PRGL2. Geotechnical units have been
correlated with the lithological units defined for this site by Bassetti et al. (this issue) and we
found good correlation. However, we grouped them in five major units for ease of consistency
5
with resistance values whereas the lithological profile identified 14 units (Bassetti et al., this
issue). At the borehole bottom (99.24-100.13 mbsf), these authors identify a very coarse clastic
unit that we have included in geotechnical subunit 5c.
The soil types interpreted from CPTU classifications (Figs. 2 and 3) are highly consistent with
the grain size distribution (Fig. 8). Graded-bedding is identified from qc at intervals where the
sampling resolution from grain size analysis is insufficient to detect them. This is illustrated by
the overall coarsening-upwards trend of subunit 1d and the interval comprised by subunits 5b
and 5c, and the fining-upwards trend of subunits 4a, 4b and 4c and by subunit 5a. Changes of
the fine fraction content, which is made of clayey silts, are well depicted by the 1/Qt profile.
4. Discussion
4.1. Soil classification from CPTU measurements
Correlations of grain-size curves with CPTU sediment type classifications at site PRGL1
indicate that the percentage of silts and clays ranges between 40 and 60% along the borehole
(Fig. 4). Units II to V are made of a mixture of silts and clays instead of mainly clays, as
suggested by CPTU classifications (Figs. 2 and 3). This can be attributed to similar (undrained)
piezocone penetration of silts and clays when they occur in similar proportions. In contrast,
piezocone testing in sediments with heterogeneous grain-size, where drainage conditions occur
(Lunne et al., 1997), as in PRGL2, allows accurate sediment type attribution (Fig. 7). On the
other hand, in deposits where mixtures of cohesionless (silty sands to gravels) sediments are
present, as in PRGL2, soil changes are better detected from cone tip resistance, qc, as it responds
more precisely to changes in drainage conditions than sleeve friction, fs (Fig. 7).
We have found a good correlation between Robertson’s (1990) and Ramsey’s (2002) soil
classification methods. However, when cavitation occurs, as in PRGL2, the Qt/FR ratio should
be used in isolation for soil-type interpretation. Gravelly sands and sands may induce temporary
cavitation adjacent to the pore-water pressure sensor location, making the Qt/Bq model
unreliable (Ramsey, 2002). For correlating with grain size we, therefore, have used only
Robertson’s (1990) classification based on Qt/FR (Figs. 4 and 7), although the one from Ramsey
(2002) can be also considered since both classifications identify the same soil types (Figs. 2 and
3).
Water pressures generate significant values of cone resistance and pore pressure, which are
corrected to zero at seafloor. In down-hole CPTU systems, the pressure conditions in the drill
pipe may not be in full equilibrium with the surrounding ground water pressure. Consequently,
zero-correction can be subject to increased uncertainty that is in the order of 100 kPa (Peuchen,
6
2000). The uncertainty for the zero-correction of the cone tip resistance is approximately
equivalent to a factor representing the net area ratio effect, which is 0.75 for the data presented
herein. The zero drift of the measured qc and u2 is considered to be within the allowable
minimum accuracy according the accuracy class selected by Fugro, following standardized
practice (ISSMGE, 1999). Therefore, we consider irrelevant the uncertainty of the derived
parameters used for soil classification.
4.2. Stratigraphic profiling from CPTU profiles
The transition from one layer to another is not necessarily registered as a sharp change in cone
tip resistance, qc (Lunne et al., 1997). Recent numerical analyses show that qc in a dense sandy
layer embedded in soft clays is less than its true value when the thickness of the sand layer is
less than 28 cone diameters (Ahmadi and Robertson, 2005), i.e. >1 m for the cone used in our
study. In contrast, for a very loose sand layer under moderate stress states (effective vertical
stress ≥ 70 kPa) the layer should be more than eight cone diameters, i.e. >0.3 m for our study.
The lower thickness of sand layers identified at PRGL2, which is 1.5 m in subunit 1c (Fig. 7), is
slightly above the 0.3-1 m cone accuracy.
Some authors (Robertson, 1990, Lunne et al., 1997) consider that the sleeve friction, fs, is less
accurate than the cone tip resistance qc and that the pore pressure u2 measurements since fs
measures average values over the sleeve length (13 cm in our case), which tends to smooth out
the record of thin layers. However, we found fs to be the most accurate CPTU parameter for
profiling the sediments at PRGL1 site, as demonstrated by its correlation with the clay content
(Fig. 6). The stratigraphic profile based on fs is further supported by the Qt/FR profile, which
proves that fs variations are, at this site, caused by changes in the cohesion that are directly
related to the clay content.
4.3. Correlation between CPTU based geotechnical stratigraphy and high resolution
seismic reflection profiles
At site PRGL2, lithological and geotechnical subunits 1a to 1d correspond to the upper
shoreface sands of the seismic unit U152 (Fig. 9a, Bassetti et al., this issue). Our sandy Unit 1 is
bounded by a submarine erosion surface D65 atop of the geotechnical Unit 2. Subunits 2a and
2b, separated by discontinuity D64, display clays with intercalations of silty clays of a lower
shoreface and correspond to the seismic unit U151 (Fig. 10a). The top of the silty clayey subunit
2c, which is characterized by a slight increase in qc and fs, corresponds to combined
discontinuity D60-D63, which separates seismic sequence S5 (formed here by U152 and U151)
from S4. D63 is an erosion surface attributed to a drop of sea-level during the overall sea-level
fall between Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 3 and MIS 2 (Jouet et al., 2006, Bassetti et al., this
7
issue). Clays in our subunits 2d and 2e correspond to the distal part of seismic sequence S4. The
sandy Unit 3 corresponds to foreshore-upper shore shoreface deposits that, in conjunction with
the clayey subunit 4a forms seismic unit S3. The underlying fining upwards subunit 4b
constitute seismic unit S2. The top of Unit 3 corresponds to seismic discontinuity D50 and the
base of subunit 4b corresponds to the combined surfaces D45-D40-D35. Subunit 5a is separated
of the coarsening upwards subunits 5b and 5c by discontinuity D30, which is at the base of
seismic sequence S0.
At the much more lithologically homogeneous site PRGL1, we found a likely correspondence
amongst units I to III and IV with seismic sequences S5 and S4, respectively (Fig. 10b).
Subunits IIb (from 33 to 36 mbsf), IIId (70-72 mbsf) and IVd (120-127 mbsf) comprise the
reflectors corresponding to discontinuities D63, D60 and D50, which are found to represent
intervals of variable thickness characterized by low friction measurements due to increased sand
content (Figs. 5 and 6). The lower Unit V corresponds to S3. The rest of the boundaries between
our CPTU based subunits do correspond to specific seismic reflectors, which are seen to
separate different seismic facies: subunits IIa and IIIc correspond to low amplitude hemi-
stratified facies; IIIb, IVa, IVb, Va and Vb to facies of intermediate amplitude; and IIIa, IIIb and
IVc to facies of higher relative amplitude. Such changes in relative amplitude in the seismic
record do correlate well with the CPTU based geotechnical-stratigraphic divisions.
5. Conclusions
The piezocone (CPTU) is a widely accepted soil classification test routinely used by
geotechnical engineers. However, CPTU soil classification charts have to be used with extreme
care when dealing with mixtures of marine silts and clays in similar proportions. The
(undrained) behavior of these admixtures is the same as (undrained) pure clays and,
consequently, they could be erroneously classified as clays. Combined normalized tip resistance
Qt and friction ratio FR profiles are very useful to identify grain-size trends in these sediment
types and verify soil type classification results.
The comparison of CPTU profiles with grain-size data and high resolution seismic reflection
profiles has demonstrated that amongst the various CPTU parameters, sleeve friction is
convenient for profiling fine-grained sediments, such as those found at PRGL1 site, whereas
cone tip resistance proves to be the best suited parameter in heterogeneous sequences with
coarse and fine-grained sediments as at PRGL2 site. The ratio of the normalized tip resistance
vs friction ratio Qt/FR has proved to be also suitable for identifying soil stratigraphy.
8
From the case study presented herein we conclude that in situ piezocone tests are a useful tool to
interpolate and extrapolate the stratigraphic profile and the soil classification on the basis of
grain-size and/or seismic reflection data. The drawbacks found in the prediction of fine-grained
deposits illustrate the need to further investigate soil classification methods in these sediment
types.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the EC PROMESS1 project (contract num. EVR1-CT-2002-40024). The
onboard scientific party of the project has been involved in the gathering of the data and their
input is very much appreciated. We thank G. Herrera (Universitat de Barcelona) for grain size
analyses and E. Thereau (Ifremer) for processing the seismic data. We also acknowledge all
other researchers and technicians from PROMESS1 partner institutions that have contributed in
different ways to this research. Associate Editor as well as G. Verdiccio and an anonymous
reviewer are thanked for their review of the manuscript. S. Lafuerza benefits from a PhD
research grant by the Spanish Ministry for Education and Science. GRC Geociències Marines is
funded by Generalitat de Catalunya research grants program to high quality scientific groups
(ref. 2005 SGR-00152).
9
References
Ahmadi, M.M. and P.K. Robertson (2005), Thin-layer effects on the CPT qc measurements.
Can. Geotech. J., 42, 1302-1317.
Bassetti, M.A., Berné, S., Jouet, G., Taviani, M., Dennielou, B., Flores, J.A., Gaillot, A.,
Gelfort, R., Lafuerza, S. and Sultan, N., (this issue), 100-kyr and rapid sea-level changes
recorded by prograding shelf sand bodies in the Gulf of Lions (Western Mediterranean Sea).
Berné, S., M. Rabineau, J.A. Flores and F.J. Sierro (2004a), The Impact of Quaternary global
changes on strata formation, exploration of the shelf edge in the northwest Mediterranean Sea,
Oceanography, 17 (4), 92-117.
Berné, S., Carré, D., Loubrieu, B., Mazé, JP., Morvan, L., Normand, A. (2004b), Le Golfe du
Lion, Carte morpho-bathymétrique 1/250000. Edition Ifremer, isbn 2-84433-140-8.
Berné, S., Jouet, G. and the Promess 1 science party (this issue), Sedimentary sequences and
sea-level changes during the last 500 kyrs. The Gulf of Lions revisited by the Promess 1 drilling
operation.
Canals, M. (1985), Estructura sedimentaria y evolución morfológica del talud y el glacis
continentales del Golfo de León: Fenómenos de desestabilización de la cobertura cuaternaria,
PhD thesis, University of Barcelona, 618 pp.
ISSMGE (1999), International reference test procedure for the Cone Penetration Test (CPT) and
the Cone Penetration Test with Pore Pressure (CPTU), report of the ISSMGE Technical
Committee 16 on Ground Property Characterisation from in-situ testings, Proceedings of the
Twelfth European conference on Soil mechanics and geotechnical Engineering, Amsterdam, ed.
Barends et al., 3, 2195-2222.
Jouet, G., S. Berné, M. Rabineau, M.A. Bassetti, P. Bernier, B. Dennielou, J.A. Flores, F.J.
Sierro and M. Taviani (2006), Shoreface migrations at the shelf edge and sea-level changes
around the last glacial maximum (Gulf of Lions, NW Mediterranean), Mar. Geol., 234, 21-42.
Konert, M. and J. Vandenberghe (1997), Comparison of laser grain size analysis with pipette
and sieve analysis: a solution for the underestimation of the clay fraction. Sedimentology, 44,
523-535.
10
Lunne, T., P.K. Robertson J.J.M. Powell (1997), Cone Penetration Testing in geotechnical
practice, 312 pp, Blackie academic/EF Spon, Rutledge Publishing Company, New York.
Medimap Group (2005), Morpho-bathymetry of the Mediterranean Sea. CIESM/IFREMER
special publication, Atlases and Maps, two maps at 1/2 000 000.
Peuchen, J. (2000), Deepwater Cone Penetration Tests, OTC 12094, Offshore technology
Conference, Houston, Texas, 1-4 May 9 pp.
Rabineau, M., S. Berné, E. Ledrezen, G. Lericolais, T. Marsset and M. Rotuno (1998), 3D
architecture of lowstand Quaternary sand bodies on the outer shelf of the Gulf of Lions, France,
Mar Petrol Geol, 15 (5), 439-452.
Rabineau, M., S. Berné, D. Aslanian, J.-L. Olivet, P. Joseph, F. Guillocheau, J.F. Bourillet, E.
Ledrezen and D. Granjeon (2005), Sedimentary sequences in the Gulf of Lion: A record of
100,000 years climatic cycles, Mar Petrol Geol, 22, 775-804.
Ramsey, N. (2002), A calibrated model for the interpretation of cone penetration tests (CPTs) in
North Sea Quaternary soils, paper presented at the Offshore site investigation and geotechnics:
diversity and sustainability, London, 26-28 November.
Robertson, P. K. (1990), Soil classification using the cone penetration test. Can Geotech J, 27,
151-158.
11
Figure captions
Figure 1. Location of the PRGL2 (42º50’58.20’’N, 003º39’3085’’E) and PRGL1
(42º41’23.30’’N, 003º50’15.50’’E ) sites. CCC, Cap de Creus Canyon; LDC, Lacaze-Duthiers
Canyon; PC, Pruvot Canyon; AC, Aude Canyon; HC, Hérault Canyon; SC, Sète Canyon; MC,
Montpellier Canyon; PRC, Petit Rhône Canyon; GRC, Grand Rhône Canyon. Bathymetry in
meters from Berné et al. (2004b) and Medimap Group (2005). 100 m contour equidistance
unless otherwise indicated. Names after Canals (1985).
Figure 2. Soil type classifications for PRGL1 and PRGL2 sites plotted on Robertson’s (1990)
charts for normalized parameters Qt, FR and Bq.
Figure 3. Soil type classifications for PRGL1 and PRGL2 sites plotted on Ramsey’s (2002)
charts for normalized parameters Qt, FR and Bq.
Figure 4. CPTU profiles from PRGL1_3 borehole. Red dotted lines are unit boundaries that
correspond to main seismic discontinuities. Blue dotted lines indicate subunit boundaries.
Robertson’s (1990) soil types based on Qt/FR are represented at corresponding depths. Numbers
in the soil type scale correspond to those in Figure 2.
Figure 5. Correlation between the profile of the ratio Qt/FR and grain-size distribution profiles
from PRGL1. Grain-size analyses were performed at 1:80 cm resolution. Sand contents
correspond to both the bulk fraction (BF) and the carbonate free fraction (CFF).
Figure 6. Correlation between the sleeve friction fs profile and the clay content from PRGL1.
Figure 7. CPTU profiles from PRGL2_1 borehole. Red dotted lines are unit boundaries that
correspond to main seismic discontinuities. Blue dotted lines indicate subunit boundaries. Soil
types are based on the Qt/FR chart from Robertson’s (1990). Numbers in the soil type scale
correspond to those in Figure 2.
Figure 8. Correlation between profiles of the ratio Qt/FR and 1/Qt and grain-size distribution
profiles from PRGL2. Grain-size analyses were performed at 1:20 cm resolution in muddy
sections and at 1:80 cm in cohesionless sandy sections.
Figure 9. Grain size trends at PRGL2 interpreted from cone tip resistance qc trends. A:
coarsening-upwards sequence at subunit 1d; B: fining-upwards sequence at unit 7; C: fining-
12
upwards sequence at subunits 4c, 4b and 4a; and D: coarsening-upwards sequence at subunits 5c
and 5b.
Figure 10. Correlation between CPTU based geotechnical stratigraphy and seismic reflection
stratigraphy at PRGL1 and PRGL2 sites. A: CPTU-seismic reflection data correlation at site
PRGL2 and B: CPTU-seismic reflection data correlation at site PRGL1.
Notations
Symbol Description, units
qc cone tip resistance, kPa
fs sleeve friction, kPa
u2 pore pressure, kPa
qt corrected cone resistance, equal to qc + u2(1-a), kPa
qnet net tip resistance, equal to qnet = qt - σv, kPa
a cone area ratio (0.75 in this study)
σv total vertical stress relative to seafloor
Qt normalized cone resistance, equal to Qt = (qt - σv) / σ’v, dimensionless
σ’v vertical effective stress, kPa
FR friction ratio, equal to fs / qc·100, %
Bq pore pressure ratio, equal to Δu/qnet, dimensionless
Δu in situ excess pore pressure, equal to u2 – u0, kPa
u0 in situ pore pressure, equal to γw · z (γw, water unit weight; z, depth), kPa
φ particle diameter, μm
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22