Student Affairs Program Review Narrative
TRIO Student Support Services, Laney College
Amy H. Lee, Ed.D., Director; Chai Saechao, Administrative
Coordinator; Will Reyes, Counselor; Vianney Gavilanes, Academic
Mentor
November 13, 2012
1
CONTENTS
BACKGROUND INFORMATION ............................................................................................................................................... 2 Description & History of TRIO Student Support Services .................................................................................................. 2 Purpose & Need ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Current Program Components .......................................................................................................................................... 3
Program Orientation ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 Counseling ..................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Academic Mentoring & Tutoring ................................................................................................................................... 3 Workshops ..................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Events: College Tours & Enrichment Events .................................................................................................................. 4
Unique Aspects of Program ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Program Goals, Indicators, & Progress .............................................................................................................................. 5 TRIO Student Demographics .............................................................................................................................................. 5
STUDENT PERFORMANCE AND FEEDBACK ............................................................................................................................ 6 How do students who receive services perform? ............................................................................................................. 6 Performance comparison .................................................................................................................................................. 7 Student feedback ............................................................................................................................................................... 7 State/ National Instruments .............................................................................................................................................. 8
Program AREA OUTCOMES .................................................................................................................................................... 8 Incorporating PLOS ............................................................................................................................................................ 8 Assessing PLOS ................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Mapping to ILOS ................................................................................................................................................................ 9
PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS .................................................................................................................................................... 9 Campus Collaboration ....................................................................................................................................................... 9 Program Efficacy ................................................................................................................................................................ 9
RESOURCES .......................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Staff.................................................................................................................................................................................. 10
Current Staff ................................................................................................................................................................ 10 Staffing Needs .............................................................................................................................................................. 10
Facilities ........................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Current Facilities .......................................................................................................................................................... 11 Facilities & Resource Needs ......................................................................................................................................... 11
Reduction & Impact of Reduced Resources .................................................................................................................... 12 Maintaining Quality TRIO Services................................................................................................................................... 12 Recommendations for College Programs & Services....................................................................................................... 12
ACTION PLAN ....................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Future Needs ................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Future Goals & Assessment ............................................................................................................................................. 12 Strategies to strengthen Program ................................................................................................................................... 13 Resources Identified from Program Review .................................................................................................................... 13
Attachment D 1 Program Review Resource Needs............................................................................................................ xiv Attachment D 2 – FACILITIES NEEDS TABLE ........................................................................................................................... 0
2
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
DESCRIPTION & HISTORY OF TRIO STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES
In Fall 2010, Laney College was awarded the TRIO Student Support Services (TRIO SSS) grant by
the federal Department of Education (DE). TRIO SSS is a 5-year renewable grant for projects that
are designed to a) increase the college retention and graduation rates of eligible students; b) increase
the transfer rate of eligible students from two-year to four-year institutions; and c) foster an
institutional climate support of the success of students; and d) improve the financial and economic
literacy of students (646.1). TRIO participants must be first-generation college, low-income, and
students with disabilities. All students must also demonstrate a need for academic support (646.3).
Laney College received the TRIO SSS grant in Fall 2010, began providing full services to students in
Fall 2011, and reached full enrollment for the first time in April 2012.
At Laney College, the mission of TRIO SSS is to increase opportunities for first-generation college
students from low-income families and students with disabilities to graduate from Laney College and
continue their education at a four-year college.
Funded by DE, our TRiO SSS program works with only 140 students at one time. Being a part of a
smaller program allows students more one-on-one time and personalized support. As a result,
students become part of a network of individualized and intensive services designed to enhance
student academic and personal development.
TRiO SSS is a dynamic program and responds to the changing needs of our students. We are a
community of staff and student scholars who work from a place of respect, problem solving, and
possibility. TRiO SSS Participants are students who are dedicated to their academic success and are
seeking a supportive environment to thrive.
PURPOSE & NEED
Laney College data indicates that at least thirty-eight percent (38%) of Laney College students are
classified as low-income and sixty-six percent (66%) as first-generation college. Approximately
thirty percent (30%) of the student body could meet TRIO SSS participations requirements (both
low-income and first-generation college).
Academic success rates for this group is dismal. Retention of this group of students is very low—
40% (2007-2008) . Additionally, for first-time students in Fall 2004, only 4.2% of low-income, first-
generation college students graduated by their fourth year-- much lower than the college rate of
11.3%. Both rate are far below the 15% national norm for community colleges. The transfer rate of
the SSS eligible population is consistently less than the general population. The eligible populations
has very poor transfer rates with only a total of 9% of the students actually transferring by the end of
their fifth year compared to over 33% of the general population transferring to a four-year college or
university.
3
CURRENT PROGRAM COMPONENTS
TRIO SSS at Laney College offers student participants a variety of services outlined below.
PROGRAM ORIENTATION
Once a student has been accepted into TRiO-SSS, they are given an orientation to the program.
Either the program Counselor or Director facilitates the orientation. Orientations are conducted in
group or individual format, depending on when in the semester the student is accepted into the
program. During the orientation the program is explained in detail to the student. Topics are covered
such as why TRiO Programs were established, the support services that TRiO offers, and the
requirements to stay an active TRiO student. The group orientations are also intended for TRiO-SSS
students to meet each other and begin developing relationships with each other as to establish a sense
of community.
COUNSELING
All TRiO-SSS participants are required to attend a minimum of two counseling meetings per
semester. Although this is the defined minimum, students are allowed to, and encouraged to, attend
more than two counseling appointments per semester if needed or desired.
There are numerous topics that are covered during Counseling and vary student by student based on
their unique and individual needs. The services provided are comprehensive and include supporting
students in the multiple domains of their lives. The four main categories of Counseling are
Academic, Career, and Personal, and Financial Planning.
Examples of individualized counseling includes academic advising (course selection, major
exploration, transfer options, Student Ed Plans); personal matters (crisis management, connection to
social services, emotional/ mental health, child care, housing, job searching, resume development);
career development (resume development, interest inventories, research) and financial management
(FAFSA, scholarship assistance, personal budget management, financial aid options).
ACADEMIC MENTORING & TUTORING
TRIO SSS offers free academic mentoring and tutoring for TRIO participants. Subject areas vary
according to participant need and are offered Monday through Friday throughout the week.
Academic Mentoring provides TRIO SSS students consistent and personalized academic support.
Mentors offer tutoring in Math, Biology, Chemistry, Physics, English, and Writing across all
academic disciplines. Tutoring sessions are typically one-on-one and an hour in length. Additionally,
they facilitate study groups, host ESL conversation groups, and coach students to use effective study
skills. Some Participants also work with Mentors to strengthen foundational English/ Math skills--
even if they are not currently enrolled in the course—so that they can retake the assessment test or
simply prepare for an accelerated summer course. Mentors also host Study Nights throughout the
semester.
4
WORKSHOPS
Workshops are facilitated by TRIO staff and occasionally by invited guests. Workshops build
student skills and cultivate an important sense of community. Workshop topics come from student
interest as indicated in semester surveys and also from common issues that emerge from counseling
sessions. Examples include Transfer Options; Securing a Strong Letter of Recommendation; Career/
Networking Night; Healthy Relationships; and Stress Management.
EVENTS: COLLEGE TOURS & ENRICHMENT EVENTS
In addition to visiting 4-year college campuses, throughout the academic year, events are organized
and TRiO-SSS takes students on a field trip into an event occurring in the community. All TRiO SSS
Cultural Events are accompanied by educational seminars, which engage students in critical thinking
and discussion. Examples: Fela! the Musical with a seminar that incorporated topics on colonialism,
cultural hybridity, social activism, and race in the fine arts.
UNIQUE ASPECTS OF PROGRAM
TRIO SSS at Laney College seeks to provide Coordinated & Intrusive services to our students. There
is frequent and strong communication among TRIO staff to ensure that student support is
coordinated. For example, students who use Academic Mentoring & Tutoring Services on a regular
basis may develop a close relationship with Mentors. If they disclose sensitive issues such as stress,
domestic violence, or homelessness, Mentors are trained to support students to seek TRIO
Counseling services. The referral is personal and documented. In another example, if a counselor is
working with a student and has sensitive information that can impact their Mentoring/ Tutoring
session, with the student’s permission, the Counselor will share a general overview of information
that other staff members should be privy to. Communication is institutionalized in our program via
the Student Action form.
Dynamic Student Services: TRIO services are dynamic in that we are responsive to the changing
needs of our students. In addition to multiple formative evaluations (discussed in later sections of this
report), we work with a TRIO Student Advisory Board (SAB). SAB works closely with the program
director in the following manner:
Support the creation of a strong foundation for TRiO SSS at Laney College by serving as
student ambassadors to the Laney community.
Ensure SSS services are relevant to participants by providing feedback and suggestions on
programming.
Build leadership skills of SAB participants in the following manner:
o Participate in leadership trainings
o Plan service and cultural events for SSS participants.
Communication: Our program uses multiple methods of
communication with our students. Content includes upcoming
workshop and other TRIO- related reminders; campus-wide
news from FAS (ex. Wellness Center events, EOPS application
opening; Financial Aid updates); and scholarship updates.
TRIO Communication Model
5
PROGRAM GOALS, INDICATORS, & PROGRESS
TRIO SSS program goals are determined by the original federal grant outcomes. They are in
alignment with College Goal 1 (Student Success): Develop interventions to that which impedes
student success, strategies to improve student success, and measurements of student outcomes.
Federal Goals Indicator Progress
Persistence
70% of all participants served by TRIO SSS will
persist from one academic year to the beginning of
the next academic year or graduate and/or transfer
from a 2-year to a 4-year institution during the
academic year.
National Student
Clearinghouse
StudentTracker for
Outreach & PeopleSoft
Good Academic
Standing
80% of all enrolled participants served will meet
the performance level required to stay in good
academic standing at the grantee institution.
PeopleSoft
Graduation and
Transfer
15 % of each Program Year (PY) Cohort served
will graduate with an associate’s degree or
certificate within four (4) years,
AND
10 % of each PY Cohort will transfer from a 2-
year to a 4-year institution with an associate’s
degree or certificate within four (4) years
No data, first cohort still
in progress. National
Student Clearinghouse
StudentTracker for
Outreach & PeopleSoft
TRIO STUDENT DEMOGRAPHICS
Age Range N %
16-18 7 4%
19-24 72 45%
25-29 36 23%
30-34 10 6% Gender N %
35-54 31 19% Male 56 35%
55-64 3 2% Female 102 64%
65+ 1 1% Decline to State 4 1&
Ethnicity N % Federal Student Eligibility N %
Black or African 72 45% First Generation Only 11 7%
Hispanic 21 13% First Gen. & Low Income 131 81%
American Indian/Alaskan Native 1 1% Low Income Only 9 6%
White 15 9% DSPS 9 6%
Asian 41 25%
Mixed Race 6 4%
Decline to State/Unknown 4 3%
6
STUDENT PERFORMANCE AND FEEDBACK
In addition to federal program goals and outcomes, TRIO SSS uses multiple tools to assess program
effectiveness and Program Level Outcomes (PLOS).
Workshop Evaluations (Likert) are administered at the end of each workshop. Evaluates
student learning.
Assessment Surveys (Likert; multiple choice;& open-ended) are administered at the end of
each academic year. Measures student satisfaction with program services and student
learning.
Academic Mentor & Tutor Surveys (Likert; multiple choice; & open-ended) are administered
quarterly.
At this time, we have limited data on student impact as we have yet to run a full cohort (4 years) of
students. Yearly data that was provided from the district was also incomplete.
HOW DO STUDENTS WHO RECEIVE SERVICES PERFORM?
Federal Goals Grant Target TRIO Outcome
Persistence
70% of all participants served by TRIO
SSS will persist from one academic year
to the beginning of the next academic year
or graduate and/or transfer from a 2-year
to a 4-year institution during the academic
year.
89% retained
(excluding students who
transferred AND/ OR
received a degree or
certificate.
Good Academic Standing
80% of all enrolled participants served
will meet the performance level required
to stay in good academic standing (2.0
GPA)
93% maintained a 2.0
GPA or higher
Graduation and Transfer
15 % of each Program Year (PY) Cohort
served will graduate with an associate’s
degree or certificate within four (4) years,
AND
10 % of each PY Cohort will transfer
from a 2-year to a 4-year institution with
an associate’s degree or certificate within
four (4) years
No data.
PLO 1: Students will demonstrate an awareness of how to access college services and resources.
Outcome: 97.9% indicated a degree of positive agreement that they did know where/ how to access
various services on campus.
PLO 2: Students will report positive connections to peers, faculty, and staff.
Outcome: 85.6% of students indicated that they feel connected to Laney peers, faculty, or staff.
Notably, students felt less connection to their peers (79%) than they did to faculty or staff.
7
PLO 3: Students will gain increased knowledge in areas related to academic and personal
goals.
Outcome: In the pre-evaluation, 43% of students agreed that they had some degree of knowledge in
workshop topics (ex. Stress Management, Career Exploration, Transfer Requirements) prior to
participation. This percentage jumped to 93.1% after student participation. Furthermore, the Strongly
Agree category changed from 5% pre-workshop to 43.8% post-workshop. From this, we can infer
that students benefit a great deal from TRIO workshops and events.
SLO 4: Students will report increased confidence in reaching academic and personal goals.
Outcome: 91.8% of students report increased confidence in reaching their academic/ personal goals
as a result of participating in TRIO workshops/ events. 6.8% of students reported a neutral impact
(Neither Agree/ Disagree) on their participation. This finding is supported by the Assessment Survey
in which, combined, 98.3% of students who used any TRIO service (Counseling, Academic
Mentoring & Tutoring, and Workshop/ Events) reported being Very Satisfied or Satisfied with the
quality of services.
PERFORMANCE COMPARISON
There is no comparison data available for performance. The following, however, compares TRIO
demographics to the general student population and the EOPS population. EOPS is the closest
comparison population as the programs share the low-income and first-generation college
demographic.
Gender EOPS TRIO Ethnicity EOPS TRIO
Male 31% 35% Black or African 60 45%
Female 62% 64% Hispanic 21 13%
Decline to State 7% 1% American Indian/Alaskan Native 1 1%
White 15 9%
Asian 41 25%
Mixed Race 6 4%
Decline to State/Unknown 4 3%
STUDENT FEEDBACK
“Staff are problem-solving and solution oriented”
“They know that you’re more than just a student”
“You guys use a holistic approach to helping us”
“They helped me unearth my previous university experience without a sense of shame”
“It really makes a difference to have someone who has gone through what you’re going through. You
are a role model.”
8
“I am surrounded by success oriented peers who are living with and overcoming challenges. I am
excited to learn with them and learn from them as well as share some of my experience.”
“Without the support that TRiO has provided me, both emotionally and practically, I don't think I
would be anywhere this close to transferring. I'm very grateful.”
“TRiO has allowed me to ask questions about how to navigate the college systems and has provided
me with allies to turn to when I experience road blocks. Having someone in the office hold my hand,
help me get started, brainstorm, or make a phone call has been so helpful when I've gotten into a
place of inertia around my education. Transitioning back to college was scary for me. TRiO's staff
and student offerings has helped me reduce my fear and given me the confidence to explore solutions
with my peers and even on my own.”
“TRIO has opened my eyes for the possibilities for me to achieve in school.”
“I joined Laney College in the year 2010.... I wish that TRiO could have got here sooner, because
TRiO SSS is a real comfort to college-bound students.”
“If I have a question and I go to TRIO I always get an answer. It might not be right away but
someone will take the time to help me get an answer and follow up by email or Facebook. I know I
can rely on TRIO!”
“TRIO has proven to be an incredible resource and one of the only things I count on at Laney. Other
than that keep doing what you guys are doing.”
STATE/ NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS
For transfer and graduate rates, TRIO uses the Student Tracker for Outreach through the National
Student Clearinghouse that accurately tracks student enrollment, graduation, and transfer history.
PROGRAM AREA OUTCOMES
INCORPORATING PLOS
TRIO has had strong performance in PLOs. We currently seek to expand our reach to students (See
Communication in Unique Aspects of Program. In the context of Laney College we seem to have
strong levels of student engagement but there continues to be a hard-to-reach population. We are
working to improve our ability to monitor student contacts in a timely manner so that we can work to
intentionally identify and outreach to those students in a timely manner.
ASSESSING PLOS
TRIO PLOs were assessed Spring 2012. See Student Performance & Feedback for more information.
In addition to PLO assessment, TRIO SSS uses multiple formative evaluations including but not
9
limited to: Academic Mentor/ Tutor Mid-Semester Evals; Mid-Year Evaluations; Workshop Surveys.
See introduction section of Student Performance and Feedback.
MAPPING TO ILOS
The ILOS were recently approved. Therefore, the PLOS are not yet mapped in Task Stream . They
will be mapped in a timely manner. They will be mapped to Critical Thinking & Problem Solving
and Personal & Professional Development.
PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS
CAMPUS COLLABORATION
Learning Communities TRiO is a member of the Laney Learning Communities, which includes
TRiO, Ubaka, APASS, Puente, B2B, Carpenteria Fina, and Industrial Maintenance. TRiO is unique
in that we do not offer courses but rather seek to build community and support for students through a
robust student services model. Therefore, our program nicely complements the instruction-based
learning communities. TRiO staff appropriately communicates with other Learning Communities
staff regarding student issues if needed; share resources and ideas; collaborate on events; and also
recommends students to join instructional Learning Communities during
Financial Aid TRiO counselors and director meet with the district director for financial aid and the
Laney financial aid supervisor each semester to obtain updates on financial aid processes; provide
feedback; and share information. Financial Aid also gives a presentation and hosts a Q&A during
the TRiO Group Orientation.
Counseling It is a high priority for TRiO counselors to attend college-wide meetings. When
recruiting potential applicants for counseling positions, the TRiO Director makes it a point to see if
applicants will be available to attend college-wide meetings as it is an important opportunity to be
connected to other counselors and receive timely information that impacts counseling students. When
hiring counselors, the Director also contacts the counseling chairs and Dean in a timely and advance
manner to incorporate them into the process.
PROGRAM EFFICACY
Counseling The counseling program is deemed to be effective because TRiO students are required to
meet with their counselor at least twice per semester, but beyond the minimum requirement, many
students exceed this amount and schedule weekly meetings with their counselor to continuously
review their academic and career progress. The majority of students are scheduling 60 minute
counseling appointments (when the minimum is 30 minutes per session) to assure that all of their
questions are being answered and so that they are well-informed about their academic and career
plan. According to our SARS-GRID data between August 15, 2011 to date to October 30, 2012 we
have conducted 572 counseling appointments with 145 unique students. On average, 3.9 counseling
appointments are being conducted per student in an academic year. In sum, we believe that TRiO-
SSS students are given ample opportunity to meet with their counselor throughout the entirety of an
academic year
10
Academic Mentoring & Tutoring In Spring 2012, TRIO SSS implemented Academic Mentoring &
Tutoring. Staff report seeing a rise in student attendance from Spring 2012 to date. Additionally, they
report seeing a rise in student engagement as evidenced by an increased level of preparation for
appointments (bringing specific questions, essay drafts, missed questions on tests/ homework). On
average student individual appointments are one-hour long; with a maximum of 2 appointments per
week, per subject. To date, over 70 unduplicated students have used TRIO SSS Academic
Mentoring & Tutoring services. In the mid-semester evaluation, 100% of students rated this service.
Excellent. 100% marked 5/5 or “All the time” in response to the following statements: Mentors/
Tutors asked questions to stimulate thinking; Explained things clearly; and helped the student better
understand the assignment.
RESOURCES
STAFF
CURRENT STAFF
STAFFING NEEDS
Counseling Intern In 2011-12, TRIO SSS had two graduate counseling interns who learned and
served 30 hours a week. Although the program, TRIO students, and graduate interns benefited
Director 1 FTE
Academic Mentor 4
@ .38 FTE
Counselor 2 @ .67
FTE
Staff Assistant .75
FTE
Counseling Intern
(AY 2011-12)
11
greatly from this experience, it was put on hiatus. College procedures regarding counseling interns
have been unclear and therefore became a source of contention among departments and came to a
standstill. We strongly recommend that a counseling intern program be developed for the college
with collaboration from the counseling department chairs, program directors/ coordinators, and deans
in impacted areas.
Student Assistant TRIO SSS will plan to bring on at least 1 student assistant to support
administrative work in the office. An expected challenge of having a student assistant physical space
for the individual to work.
Re-evaluate Director position. What makes TRIO a unique and effective program is the quality and
quantity of contact with students. As a new program, TRIO SSS continues to need a full-time
director to manage the program, build infrastructure that supports the program to meet federal
mandates, and address the needs of the college. Counselors and Academic Mentors are obviously
crucial to delivering the quality and quantity of services required to meet the outcomes of federal
mandates. However, the current model is approximately $20,000 more a year than the original yearly
grant award. It is only sustainable because of the significant amount of carry forward from Year 1
(2010-11). Therefore, should Laney College be awarded TRIO SSS in future cycles, this current
staffing model cannot be used. Therefore, it is recommended that once the program has more data
on student outcomes and is more established, the staffing model should be re-evaluated (suggested
timeline 2014) with particular attention to the Director position. TRIO SSS models differ across
colleges, however, there are two models that are prevalent. The first is where the college contributes
additional funding to sustain a strong program and the second is where the director oversees two
programs (ex. TRIO SSS & TRIO Upward Bound or TRIO SSS & EOPS).
FACILITIES
CURRENT FACILITIES
TRiO SSS is located in the Student Center building on the third floor. There are two office spaces
which TRiO uses, Rooms SC-300 and SC-301. The main TRiO Office for students in in SC-300. The
Director, Counselors, and other TRiO Staff are located in SC-300. All counseling, appointment
scheduling and workshop/event reservations are done in SC-300. There are 4 desktop computers in
SC-300 used by the Director, two TRiO Counselors, and the Administrative Coordinator.
Additionally, TRiO uses a laptop which is shared among all staff (including Academic Mentors). All
printing is done is SC-300. Room SC-301 is used mainly for tutoring and is shared among four of the
Academic Mentors. Student workshops are held in campus classrooms.
FACILITIES & RESOURCE NEEDS
Multi-use space for staff meetings/ development; study groups; student workshops; Student
Advisory Board Meetings;
Of concern is that there has been no inquiry or communication regarding the anticipated move from
the Student Center to Eagle Village.
12
Early Alert Currently, TRIO SSS uses progress reports to monitor student academic progress.
Although there is a comprehensive system in place for follow up, only half of our students submit a
progress report. Our program and our campus as a whole could greatly benefit from a college-wide
Early Alert system. Early Alert systems serve as an in intervention program that allows faculty to
notify counselors of issues that may affect the success of a student. Using Early Alert notifications
could be an efficient way to promote retention and success at our college.
Access to SSN The Annual Performance Report (APR) which is required for federal reporting
requires student level data including student SSN. Although the TRIO Application requires students
to write in the SSN, we should ensure this matches institutional records. The Director has made
multiple requests to access SSN on PROMT and no response or action has been taken. Relying on
TRIO application information for this critical piece of data compromises the integrity of the APR.
Student Group Queries TRIO SSS students are assigned to the TRIL student group in PeopleSoft. It
would be immensely helpful if the TRIO Director was able to run queries on student information.
REDUCTION & IMPACT OF REDUCED RESOURCES
At Laney College, TRIO SSS is 100% funded by the U.S. DE. Therefore, unlike most aspects of the
rest of the college, our program has not been directly impacted by cuts at the college and district
level. However, all TRIO SSS programs have experienced a reduction in funding of 3.1% of the
original award. For TRIO at Laney College, there has been little impact due to the fact that there is
significant carry forward from year 1.
MAINTAINING QUALITY TRIO SERVICES
See Resources section for Staffing and also Facilities & Resource Needs .
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR COLLEGE PROGRAMS & SERVICES
Please see recommendation for an Early Alert system as described in the Facilities & Resources
Needs section.
ACTION PLAN
FUTURE NEEDS
See Resources section for Staffing and also Facilities & Resource Needs.
FUTURE GOALS & ASSESSMENT
TRIO SSS program goals will remain same for the duration of the grant period.
13
Federal Goals Indicator Progress
Persistence
70% of all participants served by TRIO
SSS will persist from one academic year
to the beginning of the next academic year
or graduate and/or transfer from a 2-year
to a 4-year institution during the academic
year.
National Student
Clearinghouse
StudentTracker for
Outreach & PeopleSoft
Good Academic Standing
80% of all enrolled participants served
will meet the performance level required
to stay in good academic standing at the
grantee institution.
PeopleSoft
Graduation and Transfer
15 % of each Program Year (PY) Cohort
served will graduate with an associate’s
degree or certificate within four (4) years,
AND
10 % of each PY Cohort will transfer
from a 2-year to a 4-year institution with
an associate’s degree or certificate within
four (4) years
No data, first cohort still
in progress. National
Student Clearinghouse
StudentTracker for
Outreach & PeopleSoft
STRATEGIES TO STRENGTHEN PROGRAM
See Incorporating PLOs section of Program Area Outcomes.
RESOURCES IDENTIFIED FROM PROGRAM REVIEW
See Resources section for Staffing and also Facilities & Resource Needs.
ATTACHMENT D 1 PROGRAM REVIEW RESOURCE NEEDS
Division: Student Services Department/Program: TRiO
Student Support Services
Contact: Amy H. Lee, Ed.D.
Item Identified
in Program
Review
(justification)
Human
Resources
(Staffing)
Physical
Resources
(Facilities)
Technology
and/or
Equipment
Supplies
Budget
Curriculum
Confidential Counseling
offices
x
Ability to run student group
queries
x
Counseling Intern
x
Student Assistant
x
ATTACHMENT D 2 – FACILITIES NEEDS TABLE
Please list needs in order of priority within a particular category.
Maintenance
Deferred Preventative Ongoing Emergency
Reconstruction
Refurbish Remodel Renovate
Bring walls up to the ceiling to create private offices for confidential counseling
New Construction
Short Term 1-2 years Mid Term 2-3 years Long Term 3-5 years