Download pdf - Staff and NavAid, on behalf of the Truckee Tahoe Airport District, … · •FAA NextGen Get Smart WAM 07/2014 •FAA Business Case for NextGen 6/2014 •ADSB Essentials Industry

Proprietary Information 1

Acknowledgements

Staff and NavAid, on behalf of the Truckee Tahoe

Airport District, acknowledges a few important

points related to Flight Tracking at KTRK

• Airport Operations impact on the community

• The District works to provide the safest aeronautical

environment while recognizing its role as an airport

sponsor, operator, and supporter of Federal

Regulation and Sponsorship Assurance

• Technology such as ADSB and UAT Flight Tracking

has the potential of enhancing operational capacity at

the airport


KTRK Flight Tracking System

Technology Refresh

KTRK Board Briefing

Airport’s, CMAS and Vendor Site

Visits

Prepared by: Joseph LaMacchia and KTRK Aviation and Community Services

November 5, 2015


Agenda

• Presented and Proposed Flight Tracking

System Transition Timeline

• Recommendations from “May Board Meeting”

• Overview of Site Visits

– East Hampton Airport KHTO

– ANPC

– FAA Denver Center

– Rifle Airport KRIL

• Conclusion and Next Steps

• Open Dialog


Proposed MLAT Flight

Tracking Transition Timeline


Recommendations for the

Next 12 Months Presented May 2015

• Board Approved moving forward with the Discovery

Portion of the Transition Timeline

– Visit Like Size Airports with ADSB / UAT Flight

Tracking Systems and FAA, Oakland Center (ZOA)

• Leverage the Current Investment in Flight Tracking as Long

as Possible

– Current Technology Serves Airport Operations and

Community Needs

• Safety, Community Annoyance, Noise, and Master

Planning

• Conduct Market Survey for Potential Products, Capabilities,

and Costs

• Brief KTRK Board Member's on Progress


Overview and Summary of

Site Visits

• East Hampton Airport’s “Seasonal

Tower”

• ANPC “Surveillance Manufacture”

• Denver Center ARTCC “Using WAM

to Control Aircraft to Selected Resort

Airports”

• Rifle Garfield Airport “End User of the

CMAS System”


Seasonal Towers and Visual

Charted Flight Procedures• According to FAA Order 7110.79D Received from Oakland

Center– To Published a Charted Visual Flight Procedure the Airport

Must: Comply with the following criteria to ensure safety is not compromised:

• Radar control required

• Operating airport traffic control tower required at airport served by a CVFP

• CVFPs shall be contained within controlled airspace.

• CVFPs shall be developed to a specific runway. A runway to which a CVFP is published shall be equipped with a visual or electronic vertical guidance system.

• CVFPs shall originate at or near, and be designed around, prominent visual landmarks. When a determination is made that a landmark cannot be readily identified at night, the procedure shall be annotated “Procedure Not Authorized at Night.”


East Hampton Airport HTO

• Purpose and Objective of Site Visit

– Review Experiences with Seasonal

Tower Operations

– Review Benefits to Airport and

Community

– Understand the make up 23,000+

Yearly Noise Complaints

– Performance of Tower Contractor

– Estimated Costs


East Hampton Airport HTO

• Review Experiences with Seasonal Tower Operations

– Seasonal Tower Has Been Contracted with Robinson Tower Company for 4+ years

– The Tower Operates May – September to Provide Advisory Services “MOA Required with TRACON”

– The Cost of Tower is ~ $100,000 per Month including Personnel

– Benefits to Airport Safety and Monitoring of Helicopters Operations During Peak Season for Noise Mitigation

– 23,000 Noise Complaints Occur During Peak Operations, including overflights of HTO

– HTO does not have an Airport Community Advisory Board

– NO UNINTENDED OPERATIONAL CONSEQUENCES


ANPC Visit

September 23, 2015

• Purpose and Objective of Site Visit

– Evaluate ANPC’s Transponder Landing

and Surveillance System as Suitable

Replacement for KTRK


APNC Site Visit

Pro’s

• Smaller Hardware

Foot Print Reduces

Life Cycle Costs

• Provides Surveillance

and ILS Capabilities

• Interrogator Approved

by FAA

Con’s

• ADSB and UAT

Capabilities Need to

be Added and

Certified by FAA

• Timeline for Proposed

Upgrades

In summary, the ANPC Transponder Landing System is innovative technology with unique capabilities suited to increase safety for mountainous and terrain-challenged

airports. The major hurdles for the ANPC System are FAA certifications and timeframe to accomplish them.


Denver Center ARTCC

• Arrived Oct 19, 2015

• Topics Discussed During Site Visit

– Safety Benefits

– Realistic Timeline

– Operational Capacity within

Mountainous Airspace

– Unexpected Hurdles or Consequences

– Costs and Unexpected Costs


Denver Center ARTCC

Denver Center Pro’s Con’s Remarks

Safety Benefits √ Greatly improved; can maintain

normal separation vs. one in one

out scenario

Project TimeLine √ Longer than anticipated but worth

the wait

Operational Capacity √ Operational Capacity was greatly

improved due to the CMAS System.

Key areas of improvement: Safety

of Flight, Situational Awareness,

Reduced Aircraft Incidents

Unexpected Consequences √ No significant negative impacts

reported by end users or

communities being serviced by CMAS

System

Costs √ Higher than originally expected

improved safety was worth it

ARTCC Site Visit Feedback, Observations, and Comments

from FAA


Rifle Garfield Airport KRIL

• Arrived Oct 20, 2015

• Topics Discussed During Site Visit

– Safety Benefits

– Improve Arrival and Departure

Procedures

– Community Acceptance / Pushbacks

– Costs

– Timeline expectations


Rifle Garfield Airport KRIL

Rifle Pro’s Con’s Remarks

Safety Benefits √ Significantly improved Safety

record, KRIL airport is very similar

to KTRK , uncontrolled airspace

class E with no tower

Project TimeLine √ Longer than anticipated to

implement and realize benefits,

well worth the wait

Airport Capacity √ KRIL Invested $57M dollars to

improve the airport runways to

make KRIL a World Class GA Jet

Airport, this couple with CMAS

created a positive economic

impact to the community with

improved aircraft safety

Unexpected

Consequences

√ No direct community impact due

to capacity increases, community

has very low noise complaint rate

Feedback, Observation, and Comments from Site Visit


Proposed MLAT Flight

Tracking Transition Timeline


Conclusions and Next Steps

• Improved Safety and Capacity was the common theme from everyone!

• CMAS System Required State, Federal, and Local Representation to Fund, Coordinate and Approve the Project

• NavAid Recommends KTRK Proceed with Market Survey to Gauge Vendors Solutions and Proposed Costs

• Coordinate and Conduct Meeting with Oakland Center and Western Service Center


Benefits Realized by the KTRK

Community and Airport

• Safety within the District’s Airspace and Surrounding

Region

• FAA NextGen Compliant System with Approvals Provides

Stability to KTRK Flight Tracking for the Foreseeable

Future

• Will Detect Gilders, Balloon's, and Unmanned Aerial

Vehicles (UAV) that are properly equipped >55lbs

• Improved RNAV Procedures and Airspace Management

• Measurement Tools to Reduce Community Annoyance

• Increase in Airport Revenues and Enhanced Incentives

• Increase FAA AIP Money for Airport Upgrades

• Safety Enhanced during high Capacity periods if System is

Integrated into NAS/FAA


Questions?

Thank You for Your Attention


Acknowledgements

Staff and NavAid, on behalf of the Truckee Tahoe

Airport District, acknowledges a few important

points related to Flight Tracking at KTRK

• Operations from the Airport have an Impact on the

community

• The District works to provide the safest, aeronautical

environment while recognizing its role as an airport

sponsor, operator, and supporter of Federal

Regulation and Sponsorship Assurance

• Technology such as ADSB and UAT Flight Tracking

has the potential of enhancing operational capacity at

the airport


Abbreviations List

• Advance Navigation Positioning Corporation (ANPC)

• Air Traffic Control Radar Beacon System (ATCRBS Mode 3A/C)

• Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast (ADSB)

• Colorado Mountain Air System (CMAS)

• Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

• Facility Transmitting Authorization (FTA)

• Flight Information System Broadcast (FIS-B)

• Global Positioning System (GPS)

• Government Furnished Equipment (GFE)

• Truckee Tahoe Airport (KTRK)

• Multilateration System (MLAT)

• Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen)

• Noise Operations and Monitoring System (NOMS)

• Traffic Information Service Broadcast (TIS-B)

• Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS)

• Universal Access Transceiver (UAT)

• Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS)

• Wide Area Multilateration System (WAM)

• Oakland Center (ZOA)


References

• FAA NextGen Priorities 10/17/2014

• FAA General Aviation Report 06/02/2014

• FAA NextGen Get Smart ADSB 06/2014

• FAA NextGen Get Smart WAM 07/2014

• FAA Business Case for NextGen 6/2014

• ADSB Essentials Industry Paper 06/2014

• Stanford University Research Paper Evaluation of UAT vs. ADSB Transponder 05/2014

• FAA Safety Briefing Jan/Feb 2015

• MITRE NextGen Independent Assessment and Recommendations Oct 2014

• NextGen Works for Airports 06/2014