( X ) Schoolwide
Amendment Date: Amended Section:
Title I School:
Amendment Date: Amended Section:
11/14/2010
(School Improvement & Title I)
The mission of Sadie Saulter Elem. School is to be an integral part in the child's total education by providing a safe, positive learning environment. This environment will be rich in acceptance and respect in which each child will master the NC Standard Course of Study. By working cooperatively with the staff, parents, and community, we will teach our children skills for life-long learning.
Please Check One: ( ) Non-Title I School
File this document with your Southern Association School Improvement and Title I Information
Pitt County Schools Comprehensive School Plan: 2010-2012
School Name: Sadie Saulter
School's Mission Statement:
Date of Original:
SCHOOL: Sadie Saulter
K-8
K 75% now 1st K K
1st 76% now 2nd 1st 1st
2nd 73% now 3rd 2nd 2nd
K 85% now 1st K K
1st 88% now 2nd 1st 1st
2nd 70% now 3rd 2nd 2nd
3rd 40.5% 6th 3rd 6th 3rd 6th
4th 50.0% 7th 4th 7th 4th 7th
5th 48.3% 8th 5th 8th 5th 8th
3rd 35.7% 6th 3rd 6th 3rd 6th
4th 52.6% 7th 4th 7th 4th 7th
5th 72.4% 8th 5th 8th 5th 8th
• % proficient on EOG (3-8: Reading)
• % proficient on EOG ( 3-8: Math)
PCS DATA SUMMARY CHART
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012• % proficient on DRA (K-2)
• % proficient on Math Assessment (K-2)
SCHOOL: Sadie Saulter
PCS DATA SUMMARY CHART
K-8
5th 37.9% 5th 5th
8th 8th 8th
Subgroup % Subgroup % Subgroup %
Subgroup % Subgroup % Subgroup %
Subgroup % Subgroup % Subgroup %
Subgroup % Subgroup % Subgroup %
Subgroup % Subgroup % Subgroup %
Subgroup % Subgroup % Subgroup %
Subgroup All 51.1% % Subgroup % Subgroup %
Subgroup Black 45.0% % Subgroup % Subgroup %
Subgroup EDS 45.9% % Subgroup % Subgroup %
Subgroup % Subgroup % Subgroup %
Subgroup % Subgroup % Subgroup %
Subgroup % Subgroup % Subgroup %
• AYP Results: Identify subgroups not making AYP and their proficiency in MATH
2010-2011 2011-20122009-2010• % proficient on EOG (Science)
• AYP Results: Identify subgroups not making AYP and their proficiency in READING
SCHOOL: Sadie Saulter
PCS DATA SUMMARY CHART
K-8
3rd 6th 3rd 6th 3rd 6th
4th 7th 4th 7th 4th 7th
5th 8th 5th 8th 5th 8th
3rd 6th 3rd 6th 3rd 6th
4th 7th 4th 7th 4th 7th
5th 8th 5th 8th 5th 8th
3rd 6th 3rd 6th 3rd 6th
4th 7th 4th 7th 4th 7th
5th 8th 5th 8th 5th 8th
3rd 6th 3rd 6th 3rd 6th
4th 7th 4th 7th 4th 7th
5th 8th 5th 8th 5th 8th
• % of exceptional students proficient on EOG in Math (3-8)
2009-2010 2010-2011
• % of LEP students proficient on EOG in Reading (3-8)
• % of exceptional students proficient on EOG in Reading (3-8)
• % of LEP students proficient on EOG in Math (3-8)
2011-2012
SCHOOL: Sadie Saulter
PCS DATA SUMMARY CHART
Course % Course % Course %
Course % Course % Course %
Course % Course % Course %
(6-8 only) • % proficient students in CTE courses
SCHOOL: Sadie Saulter
School Reform
(Use same questions for both surveys)
* Schools will be required to conduct two in-house surveys per year that will include feedback from students, parents, and staff.
Fall survey complete as of 11-14-10. Positive results from classified staff. Will address areas for growth for the parent, student, and certif
COMPREHENSIVE NEEDS ASSESSMENT(Respond to each statement in narrative form)
Small neighborhood school where staff truly cares about the students. Ninety-six percent (96%) of students are on free/reduced lunch. Our student pop
b) Stakeholders’ perspective (In-School Survey Data)
a) Describe demographics and characteristics of school community.
Additional staff development for all staff; differentiation of instruction, use of technology, remediation, reading 3 D, accelerated class, Instr
* Review school data and consider a variety of perspectives including overall school/ student Performance, sub-group performance, attendance, teacher satisfaction (TWC), instructional practice and student learning (from walk-throughs/observations).
a) What does the analysis tell you about your schools strengths?
b) What does the analysis tell you about your school's gaps or opportunities for improvement?
Teachers truly care about students; instructional practices are evident (SIOP, thinking maps, balanced literacy, 21st century skills, technol
Mea
sur
emen
t In
stru
men
t
Bas
elin
e Target GoalPerson(s)
Responsible Title
I (0
50)
Scho
ol
Imp.
St
ate
Rem
. Le
vels
1
& 2
O
ther
Scho
ol
Ref
orm
HQ
Te
ach/
PaH
Q S
taff
Dev
Rec
ruit/
Ret
ain
Pare
nt
Invo
lve
Gr.
Tran
sitio
Teac
her
Inpu
tA
t-Ris
k A
ssis
tFe
d-St
ate-
Loca
l
1
To use data to drive differentiation of instruction through the framework of a balanced literacy program through• ELA block K-5( 120 minutes)• Measurable Targets/Exemplars/Rubrics• Study Island/Benchmarks• Learning Centers( K-2)/Flexible Grouping( K-5)/Team Teaching( 2,4,5)/Higher-order thinking skills• S.I.O.P* Language/Content Objectives* Lesson Delivery Literature Circles
Increase reading proficiency from 45.7% to 51.1% (safe harbor)
Benchmark Assessments Lesson
Plans Observation
sEOG Study Island
EOG Scores (09-10) (3-5) DRA Levels (K-5) Reading 3 D
Increase reading proficiency from 45.7% to 51.1% (safe harbor)
K-5 Teachers T.A.G./STRIDE
Instructional Coach
AdministrationRemediation/R
eading Recovery
2010-2011 x x x x x x x x x
Funding Source Title I ComponentData Collection & AnalysisWhy Did You Select
This Strategy? What Need?
Sadie Saulter
Strategy
2010-2012 Pitt County Comprehensive School Plan (School Improvement & Title I)
State Strategic Priority: Globally Competitive Students
Section A: Instructional Excellence and Alignment
Part 1: Overall strategies to achieve growth standards for all students.
Timeline
Mea
sur
emen
t In
stru
men
t
Bas
elin
e Target GoalPerson(s)
Responsible Title
I (0
50)
Scho
ol
Imp.
St
ate
Rem
. Le
vels
1
& 2
O
ther
Scho
ol
Ref
orm
HQ
Te
ach/
PaH
Q S
taff
Dev
Rec
ruit/
Ret
ain
Pare
nt
Invo
lve
Gr.
Tran
sitio
Teac
her
Inpu
tA
t-Ris
k A
ssis
tFe
d-St
ate-
Loca
l
Why Did You Select This Strategy? What
Need?Strategy Timeline
2
To use data to drive differentiation of math instruction that correlates with NCSCOS through• Cooperative Learning/Guided Instruction• Hands-on Math/Manipulatives• Math Essentials/Indicators• Accelerated Math/Study Island• Fantastic Five/Math Detectives• Increased use of S.I.O.P *Language/Content Objectives * Lesson DeliveryTeacher Created materials (math and reading)
Increase math proficiency from 51.1% to 56%(Safe Harbor)
Benchmark
s Lesson Plans
Observations
Quarterly Assessment
s EOG Study Island
EOG Scores (09-10) (3-5) DRA Levels (K-5)
Increase math proficiency from 51.1% to 56%(Safe Harbor)
K-5 TeachersT.A.G/STRIDEInstructional
Coach Remediation
Administration
2010-2011 x x x x x x x x x
3
To use cues, questions stems and advanced organizers to develop higher order thinking skills through• Thinking Maps(K-5) All subjects• Higher Order Thinking Question Stems( K-5)• Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy ( Focus-Apply, Analyze, Evaluate, & Create)• Marzano’s Critical Thinking skills• Science Notebooking-Scientific Inquiry( 2-5)• Artifacts& Models displayed for student referencePCS 28 Instructional Strategies
Increase reading proficiency from 45.7% to 51.1% (safe harbor)
Lesson Plans
Journals Benchmark
s Quarterly
Assessments
EOG Scores (09-
10)Data
Spreadsheet
Increase reading proficiency from 45.7% to 51.1% (safe harbor)
K-5 TeachersT.A.G/STRIDEInstructional
CoachRemediation
Administration
2010-2011 x x x x x x x
Mea
sure
men
t In
stru
men
t
Bas
eli
ne
Target GoalPerson(s)
Responsible Title
I (0
50)
Scho
ol
Imp.
St
ate
Rem
. Le
vels
1
& 2
O
ther
Scho
ol
Ref
orm
HQ
Te
ach/
PH
Q S
taff
Dev
Rec
ruit/
Ret
ain
Pare
nt
Invo
lve
Gr.
Tran
sitio
Teac
her
Inpu
tA
t-Ris
k A
ssis
tFe
d-St
ate-
1
To continue to use Reading Recovery in first through third grades to help struggling readers though• One-on-one ( First Grade)• Literacy Group(1st-3rd)• Monitoring( 1-3)
Research-based strategy to individualize reading instruction for students reading below grade level.
DRA’s Observation SurveyReading 3 D
DRA LevelObservation Survey, 1st -L. 0-4 2nd-L.10-16
Increase DRA and comprehension levels to grade level standards. 1st- L.14 2nd- L. 22
LuczkovichCongleton
Administration 2010-2011 x x x x
2
To use tutorials which provide additional instruction for students not proficient• SES (3-5) 2x/week; United Way ( K-2) 3x/week• Remediation Teacher (Hutchens- grade 3 and accelerated class)• Remediation Teacher( Oakley- grades 4 and 5)
Increase math proficiency from 51.1% to 56% ( Safe Harbor) Increase reading proficiency from 45.7% to 51.1%
Quarterly Assessments DRA Benchmarks EOG Reading 3 D
SES PretestEOG Scores (09-10)
Increase math proficiency from 51.1% to 56% ( Safe Harbor) Increase reading proficiency from 45.7% to 51.1%
SES Vendors Luczkovich Gooding &
Strong
2010-2011 x X X x x x X
Data Collection & Analysis
Part 2: Intervention strategies for students performing below proficiency standards & subgroups not making AYP.
Why Did You Select This Strategy? What
Need?Strategy
2010-2012 Pitt County Comprehensive School Plan (School Improvement & Title I) Sadie Saulter
State Strategic Priority: Globally Competitive Students
Section A: Instructional Excellence and Alignment
Timeline
Funding Source Title I Component
Mea
sure
men
t In
stru
men
t
Bas
eli
ne
Target GoalPerson(s)
Responsible Title
I (0
50)
Scho
ol
Imp.
St
ate
Rem
. Le
vels
1
& 2
O
ther
Scho
ol
Ref
orm
HQ
Te
ach/
PH
Q S
taff
Dev
Rec
ruit/
Ret
ain
Pare
nt
Invo
lve
Gr.
Tran
sitio
Teac
her
Inpu
tA
t-Ris
k A
ssis
tFe
d-St
ate-
Why Did You Select This Strategy? What
Need?Strategy Timeline
3
To use the analysis of Study Island data in reading/math students through• Flexible Grouping/One-on-one tutoring• Cues, Question Stems, & Advanced Organizers• Additional practice with targeted skills/PEP
Increase math proficiency from 51.1% to 56% ( Safe Harbor) Increase reading proficiency from 45.7% to 51.1%
Study Island Reports
Study Island Benchmark Assessments ( Reading, Math, and Science for grade 5)
Increase math proficiency from 51.1% to 56% ( Safe Harbor) Increase reading proficiency from 45.7% to 51.1%
Classroom Teachers
Instructional Coach
Administration
2010-2011 X X X X X X X
Mea
sure
men
t In
stru
men
t
Bas
elin
e
Target GoalPerson(s)
Responsible Title
I (0
50)
Scho
ol Im
p. (1
05)
Stat
e R
em. (
069)
Leve
ls 1
& 2
(072
)
Oth
erSc
hool
Ref
orm
HQ
Tea
ch/P
ara
HQ
Sta
ff D
ev
Rec
ruit/
Ret
ain
Pare
nt In
volv
e
Gr.
Tran
sitio
n
Teac
her I
nput
At-R
isk
Ass
ist
Fed-
Stat
e-Lo
cal
1
To use differentiatedinstruction through• Small GroupInstruction/Novel Studies• Higher-Order Thinking• Learning Contracts• Group Investigations/TieredLessons• Math Stars/Battle of theBooks/Enrichment (1-2)
Increase growth of level 3’s and 4’s by 10%
Quarterly Assessments Benchmarks DRA’sEOG’s Reading 3 D
DRA Scores EOG Scores (09-10)Benchmarks
Increase growth of level 3’s and 4’s by 10% & meet predictor scores
K-5 Teachers Encore
Teachers TAG &
STRIDE Instructional
Coach
2010-2011 x x X x
2
reading/math acceleration through• Non-linguistic representation• Hands-on Math/Higher-order thinking• Literature circles/Math compacting• Math Masters Competition• Novel Studies
Increase growth of level 3’s and 4’s
EOG's & Benchmark
s Scale Scores
TCS (3rd Grade) DataEOG ‘sGradesTeacher Recommendation (K-2)
Increase growth of level 3’s and 4’s by 10% & meet predictor scores
Dr. Colavito 2010-2011 x X x
Why Did You Select This Strategy? What
Need?Strategy Timeline
Funding Source Title I Component
Sadie Saulter
State Strategic Priority: Globally Competitive Students
Section A: Instructional Excellence and Alignment
Part 3: Intervention strategies for insuring the academic growth of advanced learners.
Data Collection & Analysis
2010-2012 Pitt County Comprehensive School Plan (School Improvement & Title I)
Mea
sure
men
t In
stru
men
t
Bas
elin
e
Target GoalPerson(s)
Responsible Title
I (0
50)
Scho
ol Im
p. (1
05)
Stat
e R
em. (
069)
Leve
ls 1
& 2
(072
)
Oth
erSc
hool
Ref
orm
HQ
Tea
ch/P
ara
HQ
Sta
ff D
ev
Rec
ruit/
Ret
ain
Pare
nt In
volv
e
Gr.
Tran
sitio
n
Teac
her I
nput
At-R
isk
Ass
ist
Fed-
Stat
e-Lo
cal
Why Did You Select This Strategy? What
Need?Strategy Timeline
3
To use STRIDE( Striving Toward Responsible
Individual Development in Education) to provide
opportunities for authentic learning and collaboration
with peers through• Project –Based Learning
• District Competitions
Increase growth of level 3’s and 4’s
EOG’sBenchmark
s Scale Scores
TCS (3rd Grade) DataEOG ‘sGrades
Increase growth of level 3’s and 4’s by 10% & meet predictor scores
Dr. Colavito 2010-2011 x X x
Mea
sure
men
t In
stru
men
t
Bas
elin
e
Target GoalPerson(s)
Responsible Title
I (0
50)
Scho
ol Im
p. (1
05)
Stat
e R
em. (
069)
Leve
ls 1
& 2
(072
)
Oth
erSc
hool
Ref
orm
HQ
Tea
ch/P
ara
HQ
Sta
ff D
ev
Rec
ruit/
Ret
ain
Pare
nt In
volv
e
Gr.
Tran
sitio
n
Teac
her I
nput
At-R
isk
Ass
ist
Fed-
Stat
e-Lo
cal
1
To provide EC students with modified and differentiated assignments within the regular classroom setting through• Individualized instruction• Small group• Open-book tests/Read aloudReading Fundations
Increase EC student proficiency and growth and provide instruction in least restrictive environment
(K-2) DRA’sQuarterly Assessments(3-5) EOG’sBenchmarksReading 3 D
(K-2) DRA’s, Quarterly Assessments(3-5) EOG’s, Benchmarks,EnVision diagnostic Reading 3 D
Increase Proficiency in reading/math by 10%
K-5 teachers Encore
Teachers EC Teacher
2010-2011 x X x X X X
2
To provide EC students with opportunities for additional tutoring through• Study Island• SES• United WayRemediation (3-5)
Increase EC student proficiency and growth and provide instruction in EC population
(K-2) DRA’sQuarterly Assessments(3-5) EOG’sBenchmarksIEP goals Reading 3 D
(K-2) DRA’sQuarterly Assessments(3-5) EOG’sBenchmarks Reading 3 D
Increase EC student proficiency and growth and provide instruction in EC population
Remediation EC Teacher Classroom Teachers
SES Tutors
2010-2011 x x X x X
Title I ComponentData Collection & Analysis
2010-2012 Pitt County Comprehensive School Plan (School Improvement & Title I)
Why Did You Select This Strategy? What
Need?Strategy Timeline
Funding Source
Sadie Saulter
State Strategic Priority: Globally Competitive Students
Section A: Instructional Excellence and Alignment
Part 4: Intervention strategies for insuring the academic growth of Exceptional Children.
Mea
sure
men
t In
stru
men
t
Bas
elin
e
Target GoalPerson(s)
Responsible Title
I (0
50)
Scho
ol Im
p. (1
05)
Stat
e R
em. (
069)
Leve
ls 1
& 2
(072
)
Oth
erSc
hool
Ref
orm
HQ
Tea
ch/P
ara
HQ
Sta
ff D
ev
Rec
ruit/
Ret
ain
Pare
nt In
volv
e
Gr.
Tran
sitio
n
Teac
her I
nput
At-R
isk
Ass
ist
Fed-
Stat
e-Lo
cal
Why Did You Select This Strategy? What
Need?Strategy Timeline
3
To provide EC students differentiated instruction within the EC classrooms through• Reading Foundations• Thinking Maps• S.I.O.P• Envision Math• Manipulative Kit
To address individual student's academic needs
Informal observations Teacher made tests
IEP DataStudents master their IEP goals
Ms. Hardison ( EC Resource) Ms. Givens ( Speech)
2010-2011 x x x x
Mea
sure
men
t In
stru
men
t
Bas
elin
e
Target GoalPerson(s)
Responsible Title
I (0
50)
Scho
ol Im
p. (1
05)
Stat
e R
em. (
069)
Leve
ls 1
& 2
(072
)
Oth
erSc
hool
Ref
orm
HQ
Tea
ch/P
ara
HQ
Sta
ff D
ev
Rec
ruit/
Ret
ain
Pare
nt In
volv
e
Gr.
Tran
sitio
n
Teac
her I
nput
At-R
isk
Ass
ist
Fed-
Stat
e-Lo
cal
1
To integrate the eight components of S.I.O.P in weekly lesson plans through• Language /Content Objectives• Lesson Delivery
Increase math proficiency from 51.1% to 56% ( Safe Harbor) Increase reading proficiency from 45.7% to 51.1%
Benchmark AssessmentsLesson PlansObservationsEOGQuarterly K-2 Assessments
EOG Scores ( 09-10) 3-5 DRA Levels( K-5) Reading 3 D
All StaffInstructional CoachAdministrationMs. Wade
2010-2011 x X X X x x x X X X
2
To communicate with families and students in their native language through • Parent Communication (print materials)• Translater for events/Curriculum resources
Increase math proficiency from 51.1% to 56% ( Safe Harbor) Increase reading proficiency from 45.7% to 51.1%
Benchmark AssessmentsLesson PlansObservationsEOGQuarterly K-2
EOG Scores ( 09-10) 3-5 DRA Levels( K-5) Reading 3 D
All StaffInstructional CoachAdministrationMs. Wade/Ms. Gibbs ( ELL Contact)
2010-2011 x X X X x x X X X X
Data Collection & Analysis
Sadie Saulter
State Strategic Priority: Globally Competitive Student
Section A: Instructional Excellence and Alignment
Part 5: Intervention strategies for insuring the academic growth of students with limited English proficiency.
2010-2012 Pitt County Comprehensive School Plan (School Improvement & Title I)
Why Did You Select This Strategy? What
Need?Strategy Timeline
Funding Source Title I Component
Mea
sure
men
t In
stru
men
t
Bas
elin
e
Target GoalPerson(s)
Responsible Title
I (0
50)
Scho
ol Im
p. (1
05)
Stat
e R
em. (
069)
Leve
ls 1
& 2
(072
)
Oth
erSc
hool
Ref
orm
HQ
Tea
ch/P
ara
HQ
Sta
ff D
ev
Rec
ruit/
Ret
ain
Pare
nt In
volv
e
Gr.
Tran
sitio
n
Teac
her I
nput
At-R
isk
Ass
ist
Fed-
Stat
e-Lo
cal
Why Did You Select This Strategy? What
Need?Strategy Timeline
3
To continue to provide a school wide ESL program by• Reinforcing NCSCOS objectives in reading/math• Making connections between languages/BrainPop/PEP
Increase math proficiency from 51.1% to 56% ( Safe Harbor) Increase reading proficiency from 45.7% to 51.1%
Benchmark AssessmentsLesson PlansObservationsEOGQuarterly K-2 Assessments
EOG Scores ( 09-10) 3-5 DRA Levels( K-5) Reading 3 D
All Staff Instructional Coach
2010-2011 x
x
X X x x X X X X X
Title
I (0
50)
Scho
ol Im
p. (1
05)
Stat
e R
em. (
069)
Leve
ls 1
& 2
(072
)
Oth
erSc
hool
Ref
orm
HQ
Tea
ch/P
ara
HQ
Sta
ff D
ev
Rec
ruit/
Ret
ain
Pare
nt In
volv
e
Gr.
Tran
sitio
n
Teac
her I
nput
At-R
isk
Ass
ist
1
To train staff to integrate the eight components of SIOP in weekly lesson plans through use of higher order thinking skills, language/content objectives, vocabulary, grouping strategies, and lesson delivery/smartboards
Mandated program PCS has adopted to address diverse learning styles
All Staff
More actively engaged students and more hands-on, interactive lessons
Principal review lesson plans and provides formal feedback
Carolina Herrera Instructional Coach Administration
2010-2011 x x x x x x
2
To train teachers to use thinking maps to illustrate teacher think alouds and provide scaffolding for higher order thinking skills through the use of Bloom's Revised taxonomy and Marzano's questioning
To unify the visual representation of the thinking process and utilize a common language across all grade levels
All Staff
Students will use thinking maps in all subject areas to organize their thinking process and newly acquired content which will lead to higher academic achievement.
Increased academic growth in K-5 (safe harbor); teacher lesson plans, document implementation
Pat Peoples Instructional Coach
2010-2011 x x x x
Part 1: Strategies for all staff development activities including state, Title I or system sponsored activities. Title I schools: include professional development towards low performing academic areas and 10% set-aside for School Improvement.
Why Did You Select This
Activity? What Need?
Staff Development Activity
Outcomes: What change in student
progress or teacher behavior will occur as a result of the
activity?
Evaluation: How will you know when
the instructional need has been met?
2010-2012 Pitt County Comprehensive School Plan (School Improvement & Title I) Sadie Saulter
State Strategic Priority: Twenty-first Century Professionals*
Section B: Professional Capacity for Teachers, Administrators and Staff
Timeline
Funding Source Title I Component
# of
Par
ticip
ants
Person(s) Responsible
Title
I (0
50)
Scho
ol Im
p. (1
05)
Stat
e R
em. (
069)
Leve
ls 1
& 2
(072
)
Oth
erSc
hool
Ref
orm
HQ
Tea
ch/P
ara
HQ
Sta
ff D
ev
Rec
ruit/
Ret
ain
Pare
nt In
volv
e
Gr.
Tran
sitio
n
Teac
her I
nput
At-R
isk
Ass
ist
Why Did You Select This
Activity? What Need?
Staff Development Activity
Outcomes: What change in student
progress or teacher behavior will occur as a result of the
activity?
Evaluation: How will you know when
the instructional need has been met? Timeline#
of P
artic
ipan
ts
Person(s) Responsible
3
Schoolwide implementation of Positive Behavior Intervention Support (PBIS) to foster a positive climate to promote behavioral and academic success through PBIS matrix, PBIS action plan, schoolwide reward system, and staff training plan and schedule
To decrease OSS and create a consistent schoolwide discipline system
All Staff
Reduction of office referrals/suspensions, increased student proficiency, increased instructional time, increased staff morale and retention
Increase in student proficiency by 10% in all areas. Reduction of referrals and OSS; teacher retention increases
PBIS School Team Administration All staff Karen Morris
2010-2011 x x x x x x
Fed-
Stat
e-Lo
cal
x
Fed-
Stat
e-Lo
cal
Title
I (0
50)
Scho
ol Im
p. (1
05)
Stat
e R
em. (
069)
Leve
ls 1
& 2
(072
)
Oth
erSc
hool
Ref
orm
HQ
Tea
ch/P
ara
HQ
Sta
ff D
ev
Rec
ruit/
Ret
ain
Pare
nt In
volv
e
Gr.
Tran
sitio
n
Teac
her I
nput
At-R
isk
Ass
ist
1
To provide beginning teachers with support from highly qualified mentors through district-wide training, computerized modules, mentee coaching
Increase teacher retention
BTs (8)
Increase in proficiency in all areas by 10% Meet Safe Harbor
Sheridan Holstein Administration Mentors District Lead (BT3) Julie Tucker
Weekly Monthly x x x x x
2
To provide teachers with support from the instructional coach through turnaround training/model lessons, NC Standards, My Learning Plan, balanced literacy training, building teacher leaders, differentiated planning support
Enhance teacher quality
All Staff
Increase in proficiency in all areas by 10%
Increase teacher retention by 5%
Staff Administration Instructional Coach
2010-2011 x x x x x x x x
Timeline
Funding Source Title I Component
# of
Par
ticip
ants
Person(s) Responsible
Why Did You Select This
Activity? What Need?
Staff Development Activity
Outcomes: What change in student
progress or teacher behavior will occur as a result of the
activity?
Evaluation: How will you know when
the instructional need has been met?
2010-2012 Pitt County Comprehensive School Plan (School Improvement & Title I) Sadie Saulter
State Strategic Priority: Twenty-first Century Professionals*Section B: Professional Capacity for Teachers, Administrators and StaffPart 2: A plan to support recruitment initiatives at the school, incentive programs to retain, and/or the placement of highly qualified teachers in areas of need. Title I schools: include the use of "reduced class size" positions, administrative support for teachers, staff development and mentor support).
Title
I (0
50)
Scho
ol Im
p. (1
05)
Stat
e R
em. (
069)
Leve
ls 1
& 2
(072
)
Oth
erSc
hool
Ref
orm
HQ
Tea
ch/P
ara
HQ
Sta
ff D
ev
Rec
ruit/
Ret
ain
Pare
nt In
volv
e
Gr.
Tran
sitio
n
Teac
her I
nput
At-R
isk
Ass
ist
Timeline# of
Par
ticip
ants
Person(s) Responsible
Why Did You Select This
Activity? What Need?
Staff Development Activity
Outcomes: What change in student
progress or teacher behavior will occur as a result of the
activity?
Evaluation: How will you know when
the instructional need has been met?
3
To provide teachers with common grade level planning time, cross grade level meetings, planning notes/minutes, collaboration with EC and Encore teachers, collaboration with Instructional Coach
To provide teachers with the opportunity to analyze data, collaboratively plan lessons, and promote grade level consistency
All Staff
Encourage professional dialogue between teachers and staff
Teacher observations, weekly lesson plans
Administration Teachers 2010-2011 x x x x x x
Fed-
Stat
e-Lo
cal
x
x
Fed-
Stat
e-Lo
cal
x
Mea
sure
men
t In
stru
men
t
Bas
elin
e
Targ
et G
oal
Person(s) Responsible Ti
tle I
(050
)
Scho
ol Im
p. (1
05)
Stat
e R
em. (
069)
Leve
ls 1
& 2
(072
)
Oth
erSc
hool
Ref
orm
HQ
Tea
ch/P
ara
HQ
Sta
ff D
ev
Rec
ruit/
Ret
ain
Pare
nt In
volv
e
Gr.
Tran
sitio
n
Teac
her I
nput
At-R
isk
Ass
ist
Fed-
Stat
e-Lo
cal
1
• To foster a positive climate and promote behavioral and academic success through PBIS, SGA, Peer Mediation, & BOSS
Decrease school suspensions and promote consistent discipline procedures
Quarterly Suspension
Data. Monthly
reporting to Karen Morris
SWIS
08-09 Suspension
Report. (77
OSS) 09-10( OSS)
Monthly
Discipli d t
Reduce office
referrals, bus
referrals and
suspensions by 10%.
PBIS Team Administration All Teachers Dr. Kornegay Ms. Vandiver
Beginning in Dec. 08 (Module 1) Whole School Implementation(2009-2010) Module 3 10-11
x
x X x X
2
Student safety and security by :• Fire/ Tornado• Lockdown / Bombthreatfire safety weekSafe Arrival and Dismissal Procedures• Traffic route modified• Staff on duty to monitorschool bus safety week
Maintain Safety of students & staff.
Monthly Safety Report, Climate Survey
09-10 Safety Report
Reduce time for fire drills and lockdown, improve safety
procedures
Administration, Staff, and Law Enforcement
2010-2011 X X x x
3
Maintain a school uniform closet to alleviate uniform compliancy issues
Assisting with students who need uniforms N/A N/A Reduce
OSS
Jarvis Church Fund Donated clothing from individuals
2010-2011 x X x X X x x X
Strategy Timeline
Funding Source
2010-2012 Pitt County Comprehensive School Plan (School Improvement & Title I)
Title I ComponentData Collection & Analysis
Why Did You Select This Strategy? What
Need?
Sadie Saulter
State Strategic Priority: Healthy and Responsible Students
Section C: School ClimatePart 1: A plan to create and maintain a safe and positive school climate which is supportive of learning; insures the success of all children and the staff who serve them; and addresses a reduction in out-of-school suspensions.
How will you know when the goal is
achieved?
How will you inform parents of
assessment results, student progress?
Person(s) Responsible Ti
tle I
(050
)
Scho
ol Im
p. (1
05)
Stat
e R
em. (
069)
Leve
ls 1
& 2
(072
)
Oth
erSc
hool
Ref
orm
HQ
Tea
ch/P
ara
HQ
Sta
ff D
ev
Rec
ruit/
Ret
ain
Pare
nt In
volv
e
Gr.
Tran
sitio
n
Teac
her I
nput
At-R
isk
Ass
ist
Fed-
Stat
e-Lo
cal
1
To continue Project Yeah in which students have to
complete physical activities outside of the
school setting
To increase physical activity for all students.
End of Year Progress Chart End-of-Year Celebration ( ECU)
Performance Charts & Take-home Activity Cards
P.E. Teacher-Hutchens Project
Organizer Students Parents
2010-2011 X X x
2
• To increase physical activity through classroom energizers & daily scheduled recess
To increase physical activity on non- P.E. Days (Active Recess State mandated) Have students adopt and maintain an active lifestyle.
Teacher Observations and Class Schedules reflect active recess time
The Great Body Shop/Health Taste
Explorers lunch menu
Classroom Teachers
P.E. Teacher
2010-2011monthl
yX X x x
3
• To address student nutrition through Taste Explorers( Monthly) and Nutrition Nuggets ( Weekly) •The Great Body Shop (health adoption)
Encourage healthy eating habits. Find out how certain foods affect their bodies
Class Participation -100% Through
Participation Log
Taste Explorers Newsletters
Cafeteria Manager
K-5 Teachers P.E. Teachers
2010-2011 monthly X x
Timeline
Funding Source Title I Component
Part 2: A plan to increase physical activity for students at least 30 minutes a day (K-8) and to assure nutrition education is taught as a part of the Coordinated School Health Program (K-8).
Why Did You Select This Strategy? What
Need?
2010-2012 Pitt County Comprehensive School Plan (School Improvement & Title I) Sadie Saulter
State Strategic Priority: Healthy and Responsible Students
Section: Physical Activity and Nutrition
Strategy
Means of Evaluation
How will you measure the success of this strategy? (Student and/or Org/Bus Participation, Improved
Grades, Improved Behavior, etc.)
How will you inform the parents and the community of the
outcome?Person(s)
Responsible Title
I (0
50)
Scho
ol Im
p. (1
05)
Stat
e R
em. (
069)
Leve
ls 1
& 2
(072
)
Oth
erSc
hool
Ref
orm
HQ
Tea
ch/P
ara
HQ
Sta
ff D
ev
Rec
ruit/
Ret
ain
Pare
nt In
volv
e
Gr.
Tran
sitio
n
Teac
her I
nput
At-R
isk
Ass
ist
Fed-
Stat
e-Lo
cal
1
Enhance communication between the school and
community through:• Monthly family newsletter
• ALERT NOW System• School Marquee• School Website
• Parent Resource TableClassroom websites
To increase communication with families in order to help students become successful
Climate Surveys & Parent Participation through attendance logs.
Monthly newsletterSchool WebsiteParent Resource Table
Administration School
Improvement Team
Monthly Yearly x X x x x x
2
Increase parent involvement through support and school programs• Barnes & Nobles Bookfair• Curriculum Night/Report Card Pick-Up• Title 1 Parenting Workshops• PTA/Title 1 Meetings (monthly)• Pizza Bingo/Violin Recital• Open House/Awards Assembly
To increase parent involvement and build positive relationships
Attendance logs for each event to track participation levels. Climate surveys
Monthly Newsletter PTA
School website Alert Now
All Staff 2010-2011 x x x X
Means of Evaluation
Why Did You Select This Strategy?
What Need?
Part 1: A plan to effectively communicate the education priorities of the students, and the needs of the families to the community, in order to gain the support of local organizations and businesses, and create partnerships that match student and family needs with what the community organizations and businesses have to offer. Public school professionals collaborate with higher education.
2010-2012 Pitt County Comprehensive School Plan (School Improvement & Title I) Sadie Saulter
State Strategic Priority: Leadership for InnovationSection D: Communication to enhance leadership capacity
Strategy Timeline
Funding Source Title I Component
How will you measure the success of this strategy? (Student and/or Org/Bus Participation, Improved
Grades, Improved Behavior, etc.)
How will you inform the parents and the community of the
outcome?Person(s)
Responsible Title
I (0
50)
Scho
ol Im
p. (1
05)
Stat
e R
em. (
069)
Leve
ls 1
& 2
(072
)
Oth
erSc
hool
Ref
orm
HQ
Tea
ch/P
ara
HQ
Sta
ff D
ev
Rec
ruit/
Ret
ain
Pare
nt In
volv
e
Gr.
Tran
sitio
n
Teac
her I
nput
At-R
isk
Ass
ist
Fed-
Stat
e-Lo
cal
Why Did You Select This Strategy?
What Need?Strategy Timeline
3
Increase student achievement through partnerships with ECU:• World Through Our Eyes• ECU Student Interns/Practicums
Develop partnerships with students and the community.
Increase student achievement. Climate surveys. Cultural awareness
Monthly Newsletter Parent Resource Table School Website
All Staff 2010-2011 x X X x x x
*Plans for additional funding.
Title
I (0
50)
Scho
ol Im
p. (1
05)
Stat
e R
em. (
069)
Leve
ls 1
& 2
(072
)
Oth
erSc
hool
Ref
orm
HQ
Tea
ch/P
ara
HQ
Sta
ff D
ev
Rec
ruit/
Ret
ain
Pare
nt In
volv
e
Gr.
Tran
sitio
n
Teac
her I
nput
At-R
isk
Ass
ist
Fed-
Stat
e-Lo
cal
1
• To increase book circulation by updating media center collection; acquisition of library books (mostly nonfiction due to EOG testing).• Update classroom libraries
Increase reading proficiency from 45.7% to 51.1% (safe harbor)
All Staff Mrs. Hamill
Administration2010-2011 X X X X X X
2
To use technology to differentiate the delivery of instruction and assessment of students:• Smartboards• Elmo( Document Reader)• Data Projector• CPSNetbooks (Reading 3 D)
To provide the hardware/software for students/teachers to utilize 21st Centurey skills and become globally competitive
All Teachers Administration Instructional Coach SIT Team
2010-2011 X X X X X X X X X
3
Provide staff with quarterly budget reports through• State/instructional funds• Media / Copier• Staff Development• Title 1 Funds• AARA Funding
Staff Survey Results Administration 2010-2011 X X X X X
Funding Source
2010-2012 Pitt County Comprehensive School Plan (School Improvement & Title I) Sadie Saulter
State Strategic Priority: Planning and Operational Effectiveness
Part 1: Financial planning and budgeting focused on resource attainment and maximizing student achievement.
Title I Component
Why Did You Select This Strategy? What Need?Strategy
Copy of budget reports
Teacher Observations Benchmarks Lesson Plans EOG Scores Observation Survey Study Island Usage & Reports
Media Center Schedule Take home reading program Destiny AMTR Report
Person(s) Responsible
How Will You Document Use of
Strategy? Timeline
Mea
sure
men
t In
stru
men
t
Bas
elin
e
Targ
et G
oal
Person(s) Responsible Sc
hool
Ref
orm
HQ
Tea
ch/P
ara
HQ
Sta
ff D
ev
Rec
ruit/
Ret
ain
Pare
nt In
volv
e
Gr.
Tran
sitio
n
Teac
her I
nput
At-R
isk
Ass
ist
Fed-
Stat
e-Lo
cal
1001 115C-301. 115C-47 Allow teacher class size to exceed limit in grades 4-12.
N/ASchool will maintain low classroom sizes to maximize student acheivement
2
3
2010-2012 Pitt County Comprehensive School Plan (School Improvement & Title I) Sadie Saulter
Data Collection & Analysis
Circumstances Under Which Waiver May be Used
How Waiver Will Permit School to Improve
Student Performane
Law, Rule or Policy Inhibiting School's Ability to Improve
Student Performance
Title I Component
State Strategic Priority: Planning and Operational Effectiveness
Part 2: *Optional* Waiver Requests of State Laws, Rules or Policies
School: Sadie Saulter 2010-2011
A.
B.
C.
The school staff approved the plan by a vote of:
Principal Signature
The plan is rejected based upon the following reasons:
Board Action
Submission of Comprehensive Plan
School Approval
Date
The plan as submitted is recommended for board rejection based upon the following reasons:
School Improvement Team Chair Signature
The plan is accepted
The plan is accepted with the following modifications:
School Year:
Superintendent Signature Date
This school improvement plan has been developed in accordance with all statutory and local board requirements. This plan includes Southern Association School Improvement Plan, Title I, Safe Schools and Title II (formerly Eisenhower Staff Development).
Date
Superintendent's RecommendationThe plan meets all State requirements and is recommended for board approval.
Board Chair Signature Date
School: Sadie Saulter 2010-2011
Date
Tracy Gibbs Principal Fellow
Erma Burstion Instructional Coach Staff
School Year:
PrincipalElected By SignatureTitle
School Improvement Team Signatures
NameGenea Kornegay
ParentParent
Samantha BlakeJill LuczkovichAnn GivensSandra Hardin
Fifth Grade Teacher
Rebecca HamillMisty JoynerNivea Barrett
Fourth Grade Teacher
Reading Recovery Teacher
SIT Chair
Second Grade Teacher
Kindergarten teacherFirst Grade teacher
Third Grade Teacher
ParentMedia Coordinator
Staff
Teacher AssistantSpeech Teacher/EC
StaffStaffStaffStaffStaffStaff
C) It is an NCLB requirement that a parent of a Title I child serve on the team. Non-Title I schools must pick a parent reflective of the demographics of your student population.
Vilma RomanDawn FletcherRachel Foster
A) Elected by PTA or largest parent groupB) Parent of an exceptional childC) Parent of Title I child/reflective student pop
Staff
Carolina HerreraJeannette Cobb
Staff
StaffStaff
A) GS 115-105.27 requires that parents be elected by the largest organization of parents at the school.B) It is a Pitt County Schools requirement that a parent of an exceptional child serve on the team.
Doris Morgan
School:
Title I (PRC 050 & 105)
Perkins Workforce Development
Vocational (PRC 17 & 14)
Stimulus (PRC 141)
Sadie Saulter
Budget Summary
Budget Code &
Category
Grants/Others (PRC 28)
State Remediation (PRC 69 & 72)
2010-2011School Year:
Travel, Meals, Registration (312)
Stipends (182)
Substitutes (186)
Budget Code Totals
Salaries Including Benefits
Non-Capitalized Equipment (461 & 462) Capitalized Equipment (over $500; 541 & 542)
Instructional Materials & Supplies (411)
Other / Specify:Parent Involvement
Other / Specify:Professional Dev.
$0.00
$1,200 68,048.80
$36,596
$1,724.93
$8,879.17
$804.54
Total: All Budget Codes & Categories $159,353.00$42,099.56$0.00$104,644.80 $12,608.64
$999.12
$41,100.44