1
RPT Chairs’ MeetingMinistry Update
School College Work Initiative Chairs MeetingNovember 7, 2013
Introductory Remarks
2
Dual Credit Student Data Report 2012-13
3
Participation• Student participation increased by 16
% over 2011-12 (15,961 students to 18,584 students)
• Number of programs increased by 11%• In 2012-13, approved vs actual student
participants was 93% as compared to 80% in the previous year
4
Success Rates
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-130
102030405060708090
100
79 80 80 8186
Percentage of Dual Credits Attempted vs. Achieved
5
Retention Rates
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-130
102030405060708090
10084 85 85 86 87
Percentage of Students Who Started vs. Finished
6
Target Group Participation by Program Focus
18,584 dual credit students provincially• 13,769 in the primary target group (74%)• 3,560 SHSM students (19%)• 1,255 OYAP students (7%)
7
2012-13 Retention by Target Group
Target GroupNumber of Students
Retention Rate
Primary Target Group
13,769 86%
SHSM 3,560 91%OYAP 1,255 90%Provincial 18,584 87%
8RPT Data
2012-13 Success by Target Group
Target GroupNumber of Students
Success Rate
Primary Target Group
13,769 86%
SHSM 3,560 90%OYAP 1,255 86%Provincial 18,584 86%
9RPT Data
2012-13 Approved vs Actual by Target Group
Target GroupNumber of Students
Approved vs. Actual
Primary Target Group
13,769 93%
SHSM 3,560 87%OYAP 1,255 83%Provincial 18,584 93%
10RPT Data
Provincial Dual Credit Footprint 2012-13 (RPT Data)
11
Dual Credits Students
Grade 11 and 12 Students= xx%
18,584
389,252*= 4.8%
* 2011-12 grade 11 and grade 12 enrolment (source: OnSIS)
Provincial Student Participation in Pathway Programs
Program %
Dual Credit (grades 11 and 12 students; OnSIS Data) 2.8%
SHSM (grades 11 and 12 students; OnSIS Data) 9.1%Co-op (grades 9-12 students; OnSIS data) 11.9%OYAP Participation (grades 11 and 12 students; EOIS-APPR data) 5.0%
OYAP Registration (grades 11 and 12 students; EOIS-APPR data) 1.3%
12
Students who Earned an OSSD 2011-12 (OnSIS Data)
• 6,026 students who earned a dual credit (as reported to OnSIS) earned their OSSD in 2011-12
• 56% of dual credit students (OnSIS data)
13
Number of dual credit students who have applied to go to college
(2009-10 and 2010-11 dual credit students)
2009-10 Dual Credit Students
2010-11 Dual Credit Students
Total Students in Dual Credits 7,570 12,202
College Applicants – One Year After 1,473 19% 2,458 21%
College Applicants -- Two Years After 2,347 31% --
14
Number of dual credit students who have registered for college
(2009-10 and 2010-11 dual credit students)
2009-10 Dual Credit Students
2010-11 Dual Credit Students
Total Students in Dual Credits 7,570 12,202
College Registrants – One Year After 1050 14% 1842 15%
College Registrants -- Two Years After 1852 24% --
15
College Conversion Rates (2009-10 and 2010-11 dual credit students)
2009-10 Dual Credit
Students
2011-12 Dual Credit
Students
One Year After
71% 73%
Two Years After
79% --
16
“Did they stay or did they go?”
DC Students Registered
2009-10 Dual Credit Students
2010-11 Dual Credit Students
One Year After
Two Years After
One Year After
at same college where taken dual credit
555 908 950
at different college than where taken dual credit
353 670 593
17
Number of dual credit students who have applied to university
(2009-10 and 2010-11 dual credit students)
2009-10 Dual Credit Students
2010-11 Dual Credit Students
Total Students in Dual Credits
7,570 12,202
University Applicants – One Year After 171 2% 291 2%
University Applicants -- Two Years After 404 5% --
18
School Within a College Participant Survey
19
Objectives of the Survey• To assess how SWAC programs help
students have a relevant and engaging high school experience
• To assess how SWAC programs help students explore and prepare for the post-secondary pathway of their choice
20
School Within a College (SWAC)• 2010-11: 1,500 students• 2011-12: 2,050 students• 2012-13: 3,048 students• 49% increase in the number of
SWAC students over last year
21
SWAC Survey Participants• Survey sent to 3,048 SWAC
students • Responses from 513 students
(approximately 17% - same as previous year)
22
SWAC Survey Participant Profile• 65% of students are 18 or under• 45% were working while taking the
program (consistent with the previous year)
• 98% of respondents took at least one dual credit
23
SWAC Survey Participant Profile
24
One Semester One School Year More than One School Year
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
35
15
5052
32
17
45
20
35
44
24
32
Duration of absence by percent of those who were early school leavers
2009-10 (n=46)
2010-11 (n=123)
2011-12 (n=137)
2012-13 (n=151)
% of SWAC Survey Participants Who Were Early School Leavers
2012-13(n=507)
2011-12(n=355)
2010-11(n=433)
2009-10(n=94)
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%
29%
39%
28%
26%
25
Who Referred Students to SWAC?
26
Guidan
ce C
ouns
ellor
Stude
nt S
ucce
ss T
eam
Friend
Princip
al/VP
Subjec
t Tea
cher
Other
Family
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
2009-10(n=88)
2010-11(n=427)
2011-12(n=332)
2012-13(n=492)
Reasons for Enrolling in SWAC
Learn more about career options
Learn more about college program options
Learn in a more adult setting
More freedom
Change in learning environment
Get remaining credits to complete OSSD
33%
36%
46%
48%
63%
69%
27Note: Same top 6 reasons chosen since 2009
28
How Did The SWAC Program Help?I usually get along well with my teachers (n=398)
I am seriously considering applying for college (n=349)
I usually have a good understanding of my courses (n=343)
I usually get along well with my peers (n=338)
I developed more realistic expectations about the academic challenges of PSE (n=327)
I am more confident about my ability (n=325)
79%
70%
68%
67%
65%
65%
Destinations after Completing High School
Other
Apprenticeship
University
Continue high school
Work
College
7%
12%
13%
18%
42%
70%
Students could select more than one option (n=494)
SWAC Survey Conclusions• As a result of the SWAC program, students
felt more confident in their academic abilities• Students perceptions of school, as well as
their future career and educational plans, have changed significantly
• The majority of participants with post-secondary plans declared that SWAC had a positive influence on their decision
• SWAC is being used as a re-engagement strategy
30
Summer SWAC• The program requirements:
– 1 dual credit + 1 Ontario curriculum credit– Dual credit teacher– On campus
• The results:– 211 students approved (85% of seats filled)– 10 programs– 87 % retention rate– 90 % success rate for Dual Credits 31
Summer Single Dual Credits
• The program requirements:– 1 dual credit – Dual credit teacher– On campus
• The results:– 302 students approved (66% of seats filled)– 17 programs– 89 % retention rate– 91 % success rate for Dual Credits
32
Improvements to EDCS Website
• Requested columns• Note boxes in transportation• Approach by program in extracts
33
2013-14 Overview
34
2013-14 Overview• Focus
– Data-based decision making– Continue work with TCU around
apprenticeship dual credits– Focus on program quality
35
2013-14• Pathways to Apprenticeship Fact
Sheets– Students must have a Registered Training
Agreement to get TCU seat purchase– TCU will provide seat purchase funding if
there is a sufficient number of suitable students and the TDA college has the capacity to deliver
– SCWI seat purchase is only for Primary Target Group student 36
EDU Website
• Documents can be found on the Ministry of Education Website
http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/teachers/studentsuccess/strategy.html
37
38
Thanks et Merci