Regional hydrogeological characterisation of the Laura Basin, Queensland
Development of coal mines and coal seam gas (CSG) resources can significantly impact groundwater systems, hydrogeological processes and the surface environment. Consequently, an understanding of regional scale hydrogeology is critical to developing effective water management strategies.
The Department of the Environment funded investigation of the potential impacts of the development of coal mining and CSG production in several Australian coal-bearing geological basins.
The Laura Basin was investigated as part of this programme due to the significant environmental and cultural heritage values of the region which include several National Parks and the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. The project involved a desktop study of diverse data sets, to develop a regional scale understanding of the hydrogeology of the Laura Basin. Full details of the method and findings of the study are provided in the final technical report (Yates et al, 2015)
LocationThe Laura Basin is a geological basin on Cape York Peninsula, QLD (Figure 1). There are very few populated places in the Laura Basin. The only major settlement is the town of Laura, with a population of 80. The region has minimal infrastructure or development and there are few roads, most of which are unsealed.
Geology and coal resourcesThe Laura Basin is a sedimentary basin deposited between 168–102 million years ago (Ma) during the Middle Jurassic and Early Cretaceous (Mesozoic). Overlying the Laura Basin are Cenozoic sedimentary deposits of the Kalpowar Basin, which have been intermittently deposited since approximately 60 Ma.
LAURA BASIN
PrincessCharlotte
Bay
CORAL SEA
QUEENSLAND
Cooktown
Hope Vale
WujalWujal
Coen
0 50 km
NT
VIC
NSW
QLD
SA
WA
TAS
15-9141-1
145°144°
14°
15°
Basin boundary Major watercourse Secondary road
Elevation (m)
-6
790
Figure 1. Laura Basin extent and DEM.
Lakefield Basin
Kalpowar Basin
?
Gilbert RiverFormation
Rolling DownsGroup
HodgkinsonProvince
YamboSubprovince
DalrympleSandstone
Fault approxGeologicalcontact inferred-400
-800
400
-1200
0
0
Elev
atio
n (m
AHD
)
??
??
300
-100
-500
-900
-1300
Elev
atio
n (m
AHD
)
0 50 100 150Distance (km)
200 300
S N
W E
15-9141-2
Distance (km)40 60 8020
North KennedyRiver
NormandyRiver
Yiin
tjigg
a Fa
ult Z
one
Palm
ervi
lleFa
ult
Yiin
tjigg
a Fa
ult
Zone
Palm
ervi
lleFa
ult
Figure 2. Geological cross-sections of the Laura Basin.
The strata of the Laura Basin have a maximum thickness of about 1 km in the northern-central onshore basin. There are three major stratigraphic units, the Middle to Upper Jurassic Dalrymple Sandstone, deposited in lagoonal-fluvial environments and which contains some coal; the Jurassic to Lower Cretaceous Gilbert River Formation, deposited in lagoonal to marginal marine environments; and the Cretaceous (Late Aptian to Albian) Rolling Downs Group, deposited in a shallow marine environment. The sediments of the overlying Kalpowar Basin are much thinner in comparison to those of the Laura Basin (with a maximum thickness of about 70 m). They are grouped into three continuous cycles of erosion and deposition. The Kalpowar Basin sediments mainly consist of semi-consolidated to consolidated sand/sandstone, gravel, conglomerate and clay (Figure 2).
There are currently no operating coal mines or coal seam gas fields within the Laura Basin. However, there is one proven black coal resource in the Bathurst Range. The coal is a high quality coking (thermal) coal with a total resource of 47 Mt. Whilst approximately 25% of the onshore area of the Laura Basin is covered by coal exploration tenements and coal exploration has occurred in the basin for many years (dating back to 1879), there have not been any other significant coal resources identified.
HydrogeologyThe principal aquifers of the Laura Basin are the Gilbert River Formation and the Dalrymple Sandstone (Figure 2). Due to the relatively limited data coverage and the low intensity of groundwater use, the Dalrymple Sandstone and the Gilbert River Formation are commonly classed as a single aquifer. There is potentially a region of Normanton Formation sandstone in the north-eastern Laura Basin. This sand-rich facies of the Rolling Downs Group also functions as an aquifer and may be locally important for spring discharge, particularly on the southern side of Bathurst Range. There are also aquifers in the Cenozoic sediments of the Kalpowar Basin that overlie the Laura Basin.
In the Laura Basin, the main confining unit (aquitard) of the Mesozoic sedimentary sequence is the Rolling Downs Group, in particular the Wallumbilla Formation. The Wallumbilla Formation forms an aquitard that is thickest and most extensive in the central parts of the Laura Basin. It is absent in the north-east of the basin and around the eastern and southern rim and also thins towards the south-west.
Previous hydrogeological studies have included the Laura Basin within regional investigations of the groundwater resources of Cape York Peninsula. The hydrostratigraphic units defined by these studies have informed the aquifer-aquitard framework developed in this study (Figure 3). However, there has been limited stratigraphic mapping across the whole basin. One of the major tasks of this project was to interpret the stratigraphy of existing borehole logs and map the thickness of the main hydrostratigraphic units at the basin-scale.
Groundwater and EcosystemsGroundwater provides about 95% of the water supply within the Laura Basin and is used primarily for stock and domestic purposes (cattle grazing), and water supply for the town of Laura. Groundwater use is generally of low intensity and is typically concentrated around the edge of the basin where the Mesozoic aquifer outcrops or occurs close to the surface. Artesian groundwater pressures are recorded for many bores and there is currently about 588 ML/yr of groundwater use in the basin. There is limited use of groundwater from the Cenozoic sediments of the Kalpowar Basin.
Unconformity
Aquifer Aquiclude
Partial aquifer
Leaky aquitard
LAURA BASIN
Claraville/Wondoola/Armraynald bedsBrixton FormationLilyvale beds
Fairview Gravel
Allaru Mudstone
Toolebuc Formation Toolebuc Formation
Gilbert River Formation
Gilbert River Formation
Claraville beds
Garraway Sandstone
Bulimba Formation
Allaru Mudstone
Toolebuc Formation
Gilbert River Formation
Rol
ling
Dow
ns G
roup
Weipa Sub-basin
N S
HydrostratigraphyCARPENTARIA BASIN
Allaru Mudstone
Aqui
fers
tapp
ed m
ay p
rodu
ce a
rtesi
an w
ater
bore
s
Central StaatenSub-basin
Southern StaatenSub-basin
CARPENTARIABASIN
Wyaaba beds/Yam Creekbeds/Falloch beds
NormantonFormation Normanton
FormationNormantonFormation
UndifferentiatedRolling Downs
Group
WallumbillaFormation
WallumbillaFormation
WallumbillaFormation
WallumbillaFormation
Mai
n aq
uita
rd(C
reta
ceou
s)M
ain
conf
ined
aqu
ifers
(Low
er C
reta
ceou
s-Ju
rass
ic)
Cenozoicaquifers
andaquitards
DalrympleSandstone
? Unnamedoffshorepackage
GarrawaySandstone
Upper semi-confined aquifer
(Cretaceous)
BulimbaFormation
Carl Creek Limestone/Wyaaba beds
Bulimba Formation/Louisa Formation
NormantonFormation
Gilbert RiverFormation
Gilbert RiverFormation
Gilbert RiverFormation
GarrawaySandstone
? Eulo QueenGroup
15-9141-3
Aqui
fers
tapp
ed g
ener
ally
prod
uce
non-
flow
ing
wat
erbo
res
Mount Isa BasinGraniteLakefield BasinQuartzite/?Granite
Tight aquitard Hydrogeologicalbasement
Figure 3. Hydrostratigraphy of the Laura Basin.
LAURA BASIN
PrincessCharlotte
Bay
CORAL SEA
QUEENSLAND
PALM
ERV
ILLE
FAUL
T
YINTJ IN
GG
AFA
ULT
Cooktown
Hope Vale
WujalWujal
Coen
0 50 km
NT
VIC
NSW
QLD
SA
WA
TAS
15-9141-4
145°144°
14°
15°
Mesozoic aquifer isopach (metres)
< 100
101–150
151–200
201–250
251–300
301–350
351–400
401–450
451–500
501–550
551–600
601–650
651–700
701–750
Mesozoic aquiferisopach data point
Major faultBasin boundary
Figure 4. Mesozoic Aquifer thickness, Laura Basin.
Desk-based studies have identified groundwater dependent ecosystems for many watercourses across the Laura Basin. Groundwater baseflow to streams and lakes and evapotranspiration from the watertable are significant components of the water balance that are currently poorly informed and difficult to estimate. No field-based validation of the groundwater dependent ecosystems in the basin is available, and groundwater discharge processes are poorly constrained.
Groundwater Flow System ConceptualisationParticular emphasis was placed on new stratigraphic interpretation of limited groundwater bore lithology records available for the basin. Recognised hydrostratigraphic units were mapped across the basin (Figure 4) and a potentiometric surface was developed for the regional Mesozoic aquifer (Figure 5). In combination with mapped faults and other major structures and records of artesian groundwater (Figure 6), Cenozoic sediment cover, Mesozoic sediment outcrop, location of artesian wells and fault structures for understanding flow systems. Note: Cenozoic sediments also cover the Wallumbilla Formation across much of its extent.), a conceptual model of groundwater flow systems was developed. The study indicated that at the sub-regional scale, flow systems are compartmentalised and controlled by fault structures and litho-facies variation.
LAURA BASIN
PrincessCharlotte
Bay
CORAL SEA
QUEENSLAND
1020
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100150200
??
?
Cooktown
Hope Vale
WujalWujal
Coen
0 50 km
NT
VIC
NSW
QLD
SA
WA
TAS
15-9141-5
145°144°
14°
15°
??
Basin boundaryMesozoic aquifer potentiometric surface >0 mAHDMesozoic aquifer potentiometric surface at 0 mAHD
10
?
Major watercourseSecondary road
Mesozoic aquifer potentiometricsurface (mAHD)
0
450
Figure 5. Mesozoic Aquifer Potentiometric Surface, Laura Basin.
There is limited information available to characterise the groundwater systems of the Laura Basin. In particular, there are <30 hydraulic head measurements for bores in the Mesozoic aquifer and <10 in the Cenozoic aquifers. There are also very few groundwater chemistry records, and identifying exact hydrostratigraphic units is difficult due to the variable quality of bore construction records.
There are no time-series hydraulic head or groundwater chemistry records available for any bores in the basin, and previous monitoring has been opportunistic for stand-alone research projects, rather than enabled by a systematic monitoring program.
These data limitations affect the capacity to understand groundwater system changes over-time, and in particular, its response to stresses (for example, groundwater extraction or changes to recharge volumes). Recharge and discharge components are poorly understood and no previous study attempted to analyse the volumes of these components at a basin-scale. Consequently, a new water balance components analysis prepared for this study helped bring together available data to improve the understanding of groundwater recharge and discharge in the Laura Basin. This provided a tool to highlight major data and knowledge gaps.
(((( ((
((
((
((
((
((((
((((
((((
((((
((
((((
((((
((
((
((
((
((((
((
((((
((
((
((
((((
((((
((((
((
((((
((((
((
((((
((
((
((((
((((
((((
((
((((
((
((
(( ((
((
((
((
((((
((((
((((
((((((
((
((
((((
((
((
((
((((
MM
FF
LAURA BASIN
PrincessCharlotte
Bay
CORAL SEA
QUEENSLAND
Cooktown
Hope Vale
WujalWujal
Coen
0 50 km
NT
VIC
NSW
QLD
SA
WA
TAS
15-9141-6
145°144°
14°
15°
Major watercourse
Artesian boreSub-artesian bore
Secondary road
Walumbilla Formation,Rolling Downs Group
Cenozoic sediments
Mesozoic sediments
Basin boundary
Anticline, approx.F
Inferred fault - arrowsindicate direction ofdownthrown block
(Inferred faultMajor faultSyncline, approx.M
Figure 6. Map of regional aquitard (Wallumbilla Formation), Cenozoic sediment cover, Mesozoic sediment outcrop, location of artesian wells and fault structures for understanding flow systems. Note: Cenozoic sediments also cover the Wallumbilla Formation across much of its extent.
ConclusionsThe work undertaken and reported on for this study forms the basis for underpinning future investigations to better understand the potential for groundwater impacts resulting from coal resource development in the Laura Basin. Our lack of data and knowledge to understand recharge and discharge processes and dynamics are significant. Decision making around future development of water or mineral resources in the basin will require a deeper investigation of these processes at both local and regional scales, including the collection of additional data.
ReferencesYates, G., Bell, J. G., Fontaine, K., Lewis, S. J., Ransley, T. R., and Tan, K.P. 2015. Regional Hydrogeological Characterisation of the Laura Basin, Queensland: final technical report for the National Collaborative Framework Regional Hydrogeology Project. Record 2015/11. Geoscience Australia, Canberra. http://dx.doi.org/10.11636/Record.2015.011
AcknowledgementsThis work has benefitted greatly from the assistance of others within Geosience Australia and outside. Staff from the Office of Water Science at the Department of the Environment provided support for the NCF Hydrogeological Characterisation Project. Penny Kilgour produced additional maps. Silvio Mezzomo and Greg Tobin from the Products and Promotions Team at Geoscience Australia produced the high quality figures. The authors would also like to thank Jim Kellett and Jane Coram from the Groundwater Group at GA who provided valuable review and comments.
For Further Information:
Gabrielle YatesHydrogeologist/HydrochemistEmail: [email protected]: +61 2 6249 9629
GA 15-9129 | GeoCat 83877 © Commonwealth of Australia (Geoscience Australia) 2015. This material is released under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence.
Geoscience AustraliaGPO Box 378Canberra ACT 2601www.ga.gov.au