Quantum Gravity and Gravity Control
Lucian M. Ionescu
Abstract
Quantizing the qubit space, i.e. the SU2 gauge group, yields the Platonic solids as fundamental
states. They correspond to triplets of flavored quarks, in duality. The structure of the positive electric
charge of the proton, and of the neutral neutron in first approximation, is claimed to yield Gravity as
a residual force. The ensuing breaking the isotropy symmetry allows for the use of Dynamical
Nuclear Orientation to control the gravitational potential and hence inertial mass, the corresponding
effective charge. This Gravity theory in a thermodynamic formulation was first proposed and tested
by Dr. Frederick Alzofon in the 1980s. The above foundations based on the SM were added only
recently by the author. Moreover, the current Standard Model gauge group U(1) x SU(2) x SU(3) is
just a “blow-up” of the local parameterization of SU(2) viewed as a Hopf fibration (see Piotr
Zenczyhowski, Elementary particles and Emergent Phase Space). This approach leads to a true
unification of “fundamental” interactions. The ppp presents the main idea in a simple and intuitive
way. For additional insights see the author’s recent preprints.
Prof.Dr.LucianM.IonescuDepartmentofMathematics
IllinoisStateUniversity,Normal,IL
PleasesupportKickstarterProjectGravityTheoryandControl:https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/virequest/62358340/edit/previewVIRequest– GravityProject
-EM/GChargeshavestructureinStandardModel
-GravityemergesasadeformationofElectroweakTheory
-ARelativisticUnifiedFieldTheoryisathand…
-Experiments:Alzofon(1970’s)and…(1990’s)
EMCHARGESHaveStructure!(ThisistheMainPoint)
� Protonsp+(uud)andNeutronsn0(udd)aremadeofquarks:upuand“downquark”d.
� ElementaryCHARGES:Q(up)=+2/3&Q(down)=-1/3…that’sit![Antimatter:ONLYinhighenergyprocesses]
� QuarkFlavorscorrespondtoPlatonicSymmetry/Solids;up/downflavorscorrespondtoTetrahedralSymmetry[TOIgroups&fundamentalgeometries]
� Matterconstituentsp+,e-,n0haveUnifiedVectorFieldsofINDEXES:(++-),(---),(+--)
� ThemutualinteractionsyieldEMandGravity!
QuarkFlavorsandNuclei[seeMoon’sModelandNormanCook:anotherstory!]
� Picturep+(uud)andn0(udd)as3D-bubbles,
ande-asanorbitalcloudratherthanapoint!
� NucleihaveFaceCenteredCubicsymmetry,andgrowlikecrystals,withvariousorientationsoftheG-axis.
WhyGravityEmerges[Einstein’sRicciTensorvs.VFIndex]
� GRusesdeformationsofthemetric:
Ricij–Rgij=GTij
[“departurefromaconformalmetricisduetoanisotropyofmatter”]
Themoderninteractiontheories(QFT)usepropagators.
� The“Elevatorjustification”ofusingRiccitensorcanberepeatedforp+,e-,n0andGravityemergesasadeformationofEM(skippingdetails:seeupcomingarticle):
� p(uud)= (+,+,+)–(0,0,+)(PerturbationofCoulombfield)
� HencepSM=2p+EM-gXYG (EMandGravitationfields)
asanticipatedbyPaulLaViolette’sSubquantumKinetics.
Neutron,Electronand…isthe
NeutrinorelatedtotheGraviton?!
� Similarly,fortheneutron:
n(ddu)= (-1,-1,+2)= (---)+(00+)=e-SM+gXYG
reminiscentoftheBetaDecayoftheneutron:
n0->p++e-+νe νe<-?->gXYGIsthereaconnectionbetweenneutrinoandgraviton?
� TheEinstein’selevatoranalysisoftheinteractionofthreechargescanbecomparedwiththeRiccicurvaturepictureofGR.Upon“zoomingout”ityieldsaclassicalpictureofaUnifiedVectorFieldwiththeabovementionedtypesofindexes:(3,0),(2,1),(1,2)and(0,3).
FromElectroweaktoQubitModel
andbeyondtoQuantumGravity� SoGravityisadeformationoftheElectroweakTheory(EM:U(1)inQubitModelSU(2)withSU(3)as“GaloisGroup”vs.WeinbergangletoembedU(1)inU1xSU2),neutrino(fermion)lookslikeacandidateforthegraviton(boson)…whataboutmassivebosonsW,Z?
� DeformationsofanSU(2)theorycanbeachievedbyquantizationinadirectmanner:FINITEsubgroups(DoublesofthePlatonicTOIgroups)andviaDrinfelddoubles…[Projectfornextsummer!]
…backtoconsequences…
TheUnifiedFieldTheory[RelaUvisUcand“hiding”theSMquarkstructure]
The“zoom-out”ofstructureofcharges,suggestsaneasyrelativisticUnifiedFieldTheoryresultsmathematically:
� TheUnifiedFieldhassourcesofindexes(3,0),(2,1)…(0,3);
� Thefieldofmovingcharges(currents)areobtainedviaaLorentztransformation:magnetismB(duetoE)andaCoriolis/Magnetic-likefieldC(duetoG);
� ThetestprobedynamicsinsuchaUnifiedFieldsatisfiesNetwton-LorentzForceLaw:
FNewton-Lorentz=(E+iG)+Vx(B+iC)
wheretheLorentztransformoftheGravitypartyieldsananalogofmagneticfieldC:Gravito-Dynamics!
[Complexstructure“i”extension:1storderdeformationparameter“h”]
TheUnifiedField
Non-Commuta*ve“Coulomb”LawApairofUnifiedFieldsourcesofgeneralindexesQ(likep+
SMandn0
SM),produceastatic(chargeatrest)fieldforceFUFsatisfyinganon-commutativeQuantum“CoulombLaw”
whereQ,Q’arematricesrepresentingcharges(so3Liealgebragenerators/”quarks”),averagingoverdirectionsU.
ItisadeformationofthecommutativeproductofEM-chargesq=Tr(Q)(likee-EMandp
+EM)withGtheGravitational
couplingconstantasadeformationparameterTheQ*Q’twotermsareEMandGforces[Rel.mass/QTBD]
EUF (Q,Q ') =1
r2
Q *SO(3)∫ UQ 'dU , Q*Q ' = qq '+G [Q,Q ']SO(3)
TheMainPoint:DirecUons!ThisNC-CoulombLawassumes“chaotic”orientationsofthenucleonsinmatter;i.e.fortwobodieswithNandN’numberofnucleons,theUFtotalforceisadoublesumovernucleonsniandnj:
FUF=Sumij1/r2<Qi|Uij|Qj>
wheretheCoulombLawtermplaystheroleofapropagatorinQFT[1/r2istheusualGreenfunction].
Whenaveragingoverdirections,itshouldyieldtheusualtwoforcesEEM(Coulomb)andFG(Newton):
[ThematrixQshouldbeacombinationofchargesandquarkmasses…]
EUF (Q,Q ') =1
r2
Q *SO(3)∫ UQ 'dU = EEM +FG
NoteontheHistoryLooking“back”andstudyingpriorattempts,IcameacrossFranzMariaUlrichTheodorHochAepinus(1724-1802)whosuggestedthattheattractiveforcesbetweentwounchargedbodiesmightbeveryslightlygreaterthantherepulsiveforces,andthatthisdifferencemightbethecauseofgravitation.
…Itrefersprobably(n.a.)totheelectricforcesduetothenegativeandpositiveelectricchargesthatotherwiseoccurinequalamounts,asasum(neutralbody);ifso,hegotitquiteright!!
Gvs.EMforEngineers!
ThetworesonantCIRCUITscanbeeffectivelymodeledforEngineeringpurposesusingelementsofcircuit:RLC-Model:
Take-HomeProject:Reproducetheexperiment!(Volunteers?)
[RLC-TheoryforLABExperiments:TBA@nextConference!)
ExperimentsinNuclearOrientaUon(seeFrederick&DavidAlzofonTheoryfordetails)
� F.Alzofon,Ph.D.advancedanexplanationofGravityControlsince1970s,basedontheideaofDynamicNuclearOrientation.
� Itisan“effectivemodel”,withoutanexplanationwhyorientationmatters,yetTESTEDandCONFIRMEDinanexperimentdoneinthe1970s[Therearealsocritiquesagainst,asalways…]
� The“effectivemodel”treatsGravityPotentialasheatpotential(harmonicfunction),andsuggestsitscontrolviaamicrowavepulsingprocedure,similartocoolingusingamagneticfield.
GravityControlviaDynamic
NuclearOrientaUon(DNO)� Theexplanationisnowclear:thenucleonsinanucleushavea“fineenergylevelsplitting”duetotheanisotropyofcharge:n0(udd)andp+(uud),whichyieldsa“G-Forcemonopole”(preferreddirection).
� Themicrowavepulsingexcitationofamaterial,inamagneticfieldissimilartotheprocessinLASERs,leadingtoinversionofapopulationofstates.ActsontheelectronSPINatLarmourfrequency,andviaspin-orbital-nuclearmagneticmomentcoupling,“tilts”thenucleusthe“preferred”way[Totheexcitedhigherenergystate],inhibitingtheGravitationalcomponent.
ExperimentalConfirmaUon� Dr.Alzofonmeasuredtheweightdecreaseofanaluminumprobe(withimpurities),subjecttomicrowavepulsesoffrequency,verifyingthatDNOallowstocontrolgravity.
� TheparametersusedintheexperimentwerethoserecordedbyaUSAFairplaneequipedwithspecializedmeasurementequipment,duringanencounterwithaUFO[seeDavidAlzofon’sbookfordetails].
� The“unbiasedcritique”ofDavidPrutchi,Ph.D.doesnotholdunderalogicscrutiny.
� The“coolingmodel”isagoodeffectivetheory,butitneedsinputfromTheoryofNucleibyDr.Moon/JacksonEarl&L.M.I.andFCCmodelbyNormanCook–condensedmatter/nuclearphysics!]
Dia/Para/Pro-GraviUsm…
� Paraphrasingmagneticproperties:dia/para/feromagneticmaterials,susceptibleofvariouslevelsofmagnetization.
� Magnetizationisduetoacoherent,combinedsuperpositionofindividualmagneticmomentsoftheindividualelectrons.
� Asimilarbehaviorisexpectedfrommaterials,withrespectwithDNO;somematerialsmaybecome“permanentG-anisotropic”(Grabennikov’sstory)andothersrequireEM-fieldandRotation(JohnSEARL),tomagneticmomentsoforientnuclei.
FurtherR&DregardingDNO
� AnindepthunderstandingofDNOrequiresrelatingitwithmagneticresonance(MRI)![SeeCarsonJeffries,DynamicNuclearOrientation;C.E.Byvik,Spin-TemperatureTheoryofDynamicNuclearPolarizationetc.]
� AbetterknowledgeofSolidStatePhysicsisneeded!
� ReplicationofDr.FrederickAlzofonexperimentisneeded!![butno“assuming”,“Ibelieve”etc.towards
“debunking”it;usingapositivemindsetandcreativeattitude]
StaUcversusDynamicOrientaUon
� ThetwomajortechniquestoachievenuclearorientationareSTATICorDYNAMIC.
� TheyallowtobuildGravityControlDevices,e.g.conformGrebennikov(“static”)andSearl(“dynamic”).
WewillbrieflylookatdynamicapproachestogravitycontrolinvolvingEMandGcoupling.
DuetoROTATIONofmass(G-current)ANDmovingelectriccharges(E-current),theynecessitateananalysiswhichismorecomplicated… [notclearatthistime!]
CouplingEMandGravito-Dynamics
� ForhighpoweredspacetraveloneneedstotakeadvantageofthecouplingbetweenEMandGravity.
� JohnSearl’sEffect/Generator:Itisnotyetcleartotheauthorhowitfunctions,butinvolvesafeedbackloop(over-unityaspect)andEM-Gcoupling.
� A.Chekurkov’sGravilladeandRusselAndersonreplicaarerecentsimilarversions:Similarly,thereprobablyisafeedbackinvolved,togetherwiththeEM-Gcoupling(Conf.UFTchargestructure).
Further“SpeculaUons”and
HistoricalAccountsofLevitaUon
Thereare“mixed”approachestoGravityControl,notinvolvingrotationandmagneticfields,achievingDNOviavarious“deliverymethods”:
� LevitationviaAcousticStimulation:Tibetanmonks,Leedskalnin…(etc.)
� Microwaveexcitations:Hutchinsoneffect,consistingofavarietyofstructuraleffectsinmaterials,includinglevitation(unfortunatelythelackofascientificapproach,ledtoatotallackofdocumentationANDimpossibilitytoreproducetheeffectsondemand).
TheAmazingHumanPotenUal!
Atatotallydifferentlevel,i.e.non-technological,gravitycontrolseemstobeattainablebyhumans(forgetSupermanJ),whileintrance,meditationorwhen“gettingintheZone”(sportives,ballerinasetc.):
� IndianGuru/Yogapractitioners(notthecheaters);
� Magicians/mediums(D.D.Homeetc.)
� FamousSaints(St.Cupertinoetc.)
� BallerinaAnnaPavlovna;dancerVaslavNijinsky
� Basketballplayers:M.Jordonetc.(50”inplay-mode)
PartyLevitaUon:Isthere“diagraviUsm”?
Diamagneticmaterialsarerepelledbymagneticfields.Isthereananalogforgravitationalfields?
Let’sfollowChildress’AGbookonPartyLevitation[Laterintheevening,havefuntoo:anyvolunteers?]…
� OrienttheQuadrupoleHumanAntenna:1)45ooffcardinalpoints;2)Alternatingmale/female.
� Polarizing/chargingthesubject:1)Stackhandsontheheadoflevitee(L1..4;R1..4);
2)Coordinatorcountsdown:10..1(charging)the4,placepointersunderthearmpits&knees,thenlift.
Note:arecentattemptbytheauthorfailedmiserably![seeUriGeller’sdemonstrationonYT…]
Magnets,BlochWall&uudIndex
Whatisgoingon?First,theFLOWthatisessential,isthatofthevectorpotentialA(itscurlisB,the“M-forcefield”)…
Next,itisworthstudyingthearticlebyRichardLeforsClark,Ph.D.onDiamagneticGravityVortexes,inD.H.Childress’bookonA-Gandworldgrid:
� Diagram6,p.63:theA-flowofthemagnethasa“broken8”wavezone,andthedirectionsoftheflowatthecriticalpointcorrespondtoatypical(2,1)-indextype,e.g.thatofthe(uup)ofaproton…
� Clark’sexplanationalludestoseveralaspectsregardingGravity,mentionedearlierhere,andrelatedtotheQubitModel/StandardModel!…(TBC)
UriGeller’sHandgrowingDemo
Atfirstitmightseemunrelated…butweknowunificationrequires“zooming-out”:openingourmindsinorderto“OpenOurReality”…
� UriGeller(andKulagina,Anastasia,etc.)demonstratedhowto“ignite”aseedintosproutingasmallplant,inhispalm,withoutwateroranythingelse…visible;)
� Itisshootingchithroughyourfingers(Gellerusedhispointer);“sword-fingers”issuchaTai-Chimove(alsocreatingachi-balletc.–seeRobertPeng’sdemos).
TheCircleofLife![FromEthericA-flowtoQi=Q.Info.&Biofields]
� Partylevitationworksbetterifopeninghandschakras(bubblingwells),andifYOUNGchildrenareperformingtheexperiment(evenonold&heavyadults).
� Briefly,theEMvectorpotentialA-flow,wasthecentralconceptinMaxwell’sTheory(etc.).CentralinAharonov-Bohmexperiment(etc.).
WhattheancientChinesecalledchi,Japanise/qi,IndianBuddhists/prana,Christians/HolySpiritetc.
� SeeL.M.IonescuTESLAtalkson“Teslawaves,BiofieldsandEthericEnergy”,2013&“QuantumInformation,TeslawavesandBiofields”,2015(!?).
…let’sseeitsrelevancetotheStructuralCavityEffect…
BacktoLevitaUon:Bugsdoit!
� Grebennikovused“Naturemadecavorite”(H.G.Wells:termforasubstancethatnegatesgravity):wingsofsomebeatles,buildinghis“flyingboard”.
� Themicro-structureofthewingsseemtobeessentialforobtainingtheeffect.
� GrebennikovnotedtheStructuralCavityEffectashavinghealthrelatedbeneficialeffect(periodicstructureslikebee-hivesetc.).
� Theobviousconclusion:A-flowcontrolvialattices(bee-hive,cloudbuster,pyramid,bugwingsetc.)enablestoControlGravity,directly(levitation)orviaadevice(board->UFO).
� MyClaim:it’sduetoStatic/DynamicNuclearOrientation!
ToDoList(“homework”)� DevelopNewton-LorentzGravitodynamics(Theory)� ReproducetheGravityInductionExperiment(Lab).� ExperimentofDr.FrederickAlzofon:playwithit!
[RelatewithwhatHutchinsonisdoing…?]
� ExperimentswithSCE(e.g.pyramideffect)andstudytheconnectionwithA/qi-flow;effectondynamic/staticweight?
� Trainyourself!� InvestigateShaolinMartialArtsforjumptrainingtechniques,
accountsetc.� Studytheeffectofmeditationonyourabilities� Learnto“Get-in-the-Zone”!� TryreplicatingUriGeller’sexperiments!
� Educateothers&Network!
Bibliography[Toconsultforfurtherdetails]
� L.M.Ionescu:
2020AUnifiedFieldTheoryapproachtoGravityControl,
2019QubitModel:APlatonicandExceptionalTheory,
2011Super-symmetry,anti-gravityandfreeenergy
� FrederickAlzofonandDavidAlzofon:GravityControlwithPresentTechnology
� SeeVictorGrebennikovandStructuralCavityEffect
� SeeHutchinsoneffectetc.
� VIRequest– GravityProject–website