Protecting IP Rights Under Federal Grants
Richard W. Oehler Eric A. AaserudTel: (206) 359-8419 Tel: (208) [email protected] [email protected]
2
Overview
The Federal Government is providing substantial research and product development funds through federal grants
This money, however, does come with strings, including providing the Government with some IP rights
Judicious planning, and following proper procedures, can possibly minimize, but not eliminate, these Government rights
3
Overview (cont)
There are a number of ways in which a company can accept federal funding, including procurement contracts, CRADAs, grants and cooperative agreements (which are cost-sharing grants)
We will focus on grants and cooperative agreements
4
Overview (cont)
Further, we will focus primarily on DOE grants, although there are other federal agencies that award grants under somewhat different regulations
We also will address a variant of DOE grants called Technology Investment Agreements ("TIAs")
5
Overview (cont)
General areas: Patent rights Data rights Technology Investment Agreements
6
Patent Rights
All federal grants, including DOE grants, incorporate Bayh-Dole Act provisions
Bayh-Dole Act: Under any "subject invention," the
Government obtains a Government purpose patent license (which is a nonexclusive, nontransferable, irrevocable, global, paid-up, perpetual license to practice an invention for Government purposes)
7
Patent Rights (cont)
"Subject Invention" is an invention conceived or first actually reduced to practice in performance of the DOE grant "Conceived" - inventor has a definite idea of
a complete and operative invention "Reduced to practice" - invention will perform
as intended beyond a probability of failure "Government Purpose" - practice for or on
behalf of the U.S. the invention on a worldwide basis
8
Patent Rights (cont)
Under non-DOE grants, the company can obtain title to the invention by following certain procedures
Under DOE grants, that remains true for small businesses and non-profit organizations
9
Patent Rights (cont)
For large businesses, DOE retains title to the invention and the large business obtains a nonexclusive license
Large businesses, however, can ask DOE to waive title to the invention on an individual basis or on an advance waiver basis
Also, certain DOE grant programs, such as ARPA-E, permit large businesses to take title to subject inventions through a "class waiver"
10
Patent Rights (cont)
ARPA-E program provides a class waiver for large businesses that – cost share at least 20%, and agree to manufacture in the U.S. new technology
created under the award or to provide other net economic benefits to the U.S.
Large business recipients that do not qualify may still request an individual waiver before or within 30 days after the award
11
Patent Rights – Notice Requirements
Small businesses and non-profits To obtain title, recipient must disclose the
subject invention to Government within 2 months after the inventor discloses the invention to recipient
12
Patent Rights – Notice (cont)
Small businesses and non-profits Recipient may elect to obtain title to the
invention by notifying DOE within 2 years of disclosure to DOE
13
Patent Rights – Notice (cont)
Small businesses and non-profits Recipient must file its initial patent
application on an elected invention – within 1 year after election or, if earlier, prior to the end of any statutory
period wherein valid patent protection can be obtained in the U.S. after a publication, on sale, or public use
14
Patent Rights – Notice (cont)
Large businesses (under class waiver) Recipient must disclose subject invention
to DOE – within 6 months after conception or first
actual reduction to practice, whichever occurs first
in any event, prior to any sale, public use, or public disclosure of such invention
15
Patent Rights – Notice (cont)
Large businesses (under class waiver) Recipient shall elect in writing whether or
not to retain title by notifying DOE within 8 months of disclosure, as to those countries (including the U.S.) in which recipient will retain title
16
Patent Rights – Filing
Large businesses (under class waiver) Recipient must file its initial patent
application on an elected invention – within 1 year after election but not later than at least 60 days prior to the
end of any statutory period wherein valid patent protection can be obtained in the U.S. after a publication, on sale, or public use
17
Other Patent Rights Issues
Domestic preference March-in rights
18
Domestic Preference
Recipient agrees that neither it nor an assignee will grant an exclusive right to use or sell any subject invention in the U.S. unless such person agrees that products embodying the subject invention will be manufactured substantially in the U.S.
19
Domestic Preference
Potential waiver of preference requirement upon a showing by the recipient or its assignee that – Reasonable but unsuccessful efforts have
been made to grant licenses on similar terms to potential licensees that would be likely to manufacture substantially in the U.S.; or
Domestic manufacture is not commercially feasible
20
March-in Rights
Under specific circumstances the Government can require forced licensing to a "responsible applicant" through march-in rights
Circumstances include: failure to diligently take steps to achieve practical
application alleviation of health or safety needs which are not
reasonably satisfied by recipient failure to meet the domestic manufacturing requirement
These rights have never been exercised
21
Patent Rights - Strategies
Consider that, at a minimum, the Government will obtain a Government purpose license and the impact on your future plans
Consider whether you should patent certain activities before starting performance under a DOE grant
22
Data Rights
Refers to a license to the Government of rights in data that you generate in performance of the agreement and deliver to the Government
"Data" is recorded information regardless of form or the media on which it may be recorded
23
Data Rights (cont)
Data can be either computer software or technical data
The rights range from Limited or Restricted to Unlimited generally based on (i) the funding source and (ii) whether proper procedures were followed in data delivery
24
Data Rights (cont)
Limited Rights (technical data) or Restricted Rights (computer software) Best set of rights from the recipient's
perspective
25
Limited Rights License
Under DOE Limited Rights –Data may be reproduced and used by the Government with the limitation that they will not be used for purposes of manufacture nor disclosed outside Government, except . . . .
26
Limited Rights License (cont)
Government may disclose data outside Government for –1. Use by support services contractors within the scope
of their contracts2. Disclosure for evaluation purposes under the
restriction that data retained in confidence and not be further disclosed
3. Disclosure to other recipients participating in the same grant program under the restriction that data be retained in confidence and not be further disclosed.
27
Limited Rights License (cont)
4. Use by the Government or others on its behalf for emergency repair or overhaul work under the restriction that the data be retained in confidence and not be further disclosed; and
5. Release to a foreign government, as the interests of the U.S. Government may require, for information or evaluation, or for emergency repair or overhaul work by such government.
28
Restricted Rights License
Under Restricted Rights, computer software may not be used, reproduced, or disclosed by the Government, except that it may be –
1. Used or copied for use with the computers for which it was acquired
2. Used or copied for use in a backup computer if the computer for which it was acquired becomes inoperative
29
Restricted Rights License (cont)
3. Reproduced for backup purposes
4. Modified or combined with other computer software, provided that the modified or adapted portions are made subject to the same Restricted Rights
30
Restricted Rights (cont)
5. Disclosed to and reproduced for use by support service Recipients provided the Government makes such disclosure or reproduction subject to the same Restricted Rights
6. Used or copied for use in a replacement computer
31
Development at Private Expense
Government obtains Limited or Restricted Rights in data developed at private expense The data must also (i) embody trade secrets
or (ii) be commercial or financial and confidential or privileged
Government obtains Unlimited Rights in data developed at Government expense
32
Protecting Privately Developed Data
Key #1 Deliverable data developed at private
expense should be identified as such in your proposal or application
33
Protecting Privately Developed Data
Key #2 Properly mark the data before delivery by
"affixing" either the Limited Rights or Restricted Rights legend
These legends are found at 10 CFR 600, Appendix A to Subpart D and are too lengthy to state here
34
Protected Rights
In some programs, such as ARPA-E, the recipient may, with DOE's approval, claim as "protected data" any data first produced in the performance of the award that would have been a trade secret if developed at private expense
35
Protected Rights License
Data may not be published, disseminated, or disclosed to others outside the Government until 5 years after development of information, unless express written authorization is obtained from the recipient
After 5 years, the Government takes Unlimited Rights in the data
36
Protected Rights Notice
To enjoy protection, must deliver data with Protected Rights Notice affixed to the data.
Use exact same language as set forth in Protected Rights Notice in the grant. (The text in the instrument can vary slightly from the clause.)
If the Notice is not in the grant, then use the exact language found in the clause set forth at 10 CFR App. A to Subpart D of Part 600.)
37
Strict Compliance
Failure to properly identify and mark data puts the Government in position to claim Unlimited Rights in the data
In fact, failure to properly mark data with the proper notice means the data "shall be deemed to have been furnished with Unlimited Rights"
38
Technology Investment Agreements
ARPA-E funding opportunity announcement:
"ARPA-E anticipates awarding grants, cooperative agreements, or Technology Investment Agreements" and "[c]ooperative agreements and TIAs are the most likely instruments to be used."
39
TIAs (cont)
Two types of TIAs:1. Cooperative agreement with more flexible
provisions tailored for commercial firms but with IP provisions in full compliance with the DOE IP statutes and regulations; and
2. "Other transaction" in which intellectual property provisions can vary from DOE IP statutes and regulations
40
TIAs (cont)
Cooperative agreement type of TIA: A cooperative agreement with more flexible
provisions tailored for commercial firms (as distinct from a cooperative agreement subject to all the requirements in 10 CFR 600), but with IP provisions in full compliance with the DOE intellectual property statutes (i.e., Bayh-Dole and 42 U.S.C. 2181 and 5908)
E.g., reduction of financial management system requirements, access to records, etc.
41
TIAs (cont)
ARPA-E general policy limited by Recovery Act: ARPA-E FOA: "Recovery Act . . . includes express
requirements with respect to audit provisions and property management . . . Otherwise, it is ARPA-E’s general policy to avoid requirements that would force participants to use different financial management, property management, and purchasing systems than those currently in use."
42
TIAs (cont)
"Other transaction" type of TIA: Authorized if the grants officer determines there is a
unique, exceptional need to vary from the standard IP requirements. 10 CFR 603.105(b).
ARPA-E FOA focuses on this second type of TIA: ("In a TIA the intellectual property rights are not subject to the requirements of the Bayh-Dole Act or 42 U.S.C. 5908 and are negotiable.")
43
TIAs (cont)
Examples of possible variance under "other transaction" type of TIA: Data rights: Remove the 5-year limit on
Limited/Restricted Rights or increase the 5-year period to, say, 10 years
Data rights: Narrow the scope of the Unlimited Rights license (to something more like DOD's Government Purpose Rights, for example)
Patents: Eliminate or narrow the scope of the broad "nonexclusive paid-up" patent license
44
Negotiating Use of a TIA
ARPA-E FOA: "An applicant may request a TIA if the applicant believes that using a TIA could benefit the objectives of the program and can document these benefits."
45
Negotiating Use of a TIA (cont)
Recipient might emphasize such factors as High cost sharing commitment on the part of
recipient High cost of privately developing the proprietary
information Importance of protecting recipient's proprietary
information from recipient's and DOE's perspective Benefits in meeting overall program objectives
17737540