September 2004
James D. Allen, Appairent Technologies Slide 1
doc.: IEEE 802.15-0544r0
Submission
Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Submission Title: [TGn to WG15 Liaison Report]Date Submitted: [16 September 2004]Source: [James D. Allen] Company [Appairent Technologies]Address [Add address Street, City, PC, Province/State, Country]Voice:[Add telephone number], FAX: [Add FAX number], E-Mail:[Add e-mail address]
Re: [Excerpted from TGn Chair’s closing report, document 11-04-1xxx-00-000n]
Abstract: [Summary of September 2004 Berlin meeting status]
Purpose: [Inform the WG]
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15.
September 2004
James D. Allen, Appairent Technologies Slide 2
doc.: IEEE 802.15-0544r0
Submission
These notes courtesy of Bruce Kraemer, Chair TGn with my editorial comments
Partially From Document
11-04-1030-02-000n
September 2004
James D. Allen, Appairent Technologies Slide 3
doc.: IEEE 802.15-0544r0
Submission
September SummaryGood news• 32 presentations completed• Because the presentations did not fill every available meeting
minute there was adequate time to caucus and, at least tentatively, explore possible mergers which would result in new completes or revised completes.
Bad News• Complete presentations did not have adequate time to present
or answer audience questions.• Not enough time to conduct panel discussion or additional
selection steps.• Not known how many completes will exist in November
September 2004
James D. Allen, Appairent Technologies Slide 4
doc.: IEEE 802.15-0544r0
Submission
Approved Speaker SequenceSpeaker Documents
Sequence Day Start Time First Last complete partial Sponsor Company #
1 Monday 11:30 AM Feng-Wen Sun PHY Hughes Network Systems 941, 942, 9442 Monday 1:30 PM Nico van Waes Y Nokia 946, 947, 9483 Monday 2:30 PM Herve Bonneville Y Mitsubishi 914, 915, 916, 9864 Monday 4:00 PM Patrik Eriksson Y Wavebreaker (was Acreo) 928, 9295 Monday 5:00 PM John Kowalski Y Sharp 938, 939, 9406 Monday 7:30 PM Sun Sumei PHY Infocomm Research 875, 876, 9117 Monday 8:30 PM Michiharu Nakamura Y Fujitsu 936, 9378 Tuesday 8:00 AM Jeng-Hong Chen Y Winbond 9349 Tuesday 9:00 AM Qiang Ni Y Hamilton Institute 949, 950
10 Tuesday 10:30 AM Marie-Helene Hamon Y France Telecom 902, 903, 90411 Tuesday 11:30 AM George Vlantis PHY ST Microelectronics 898, 90012 Tuesday 1:30 PM Robert Heath Y UT Texas 96213 Tuesday 2:30 PM Mary Cramer Y Agere 887-89514 Tuesday 4:00 PM Andy Molisch Y Mitsubishi 995, 996, 99715 Tuesday 5:00 PM Osama Aboul-Magd Y Nortel 879, 88016 Tuesday 7:30 PM Pen Li Y Philips 943, 94517 Tuesday 8:30 PM James Allen Y Appairent 90918 Wednesday 8:00 AM Sean Coffey Y TI 951, 95219 Wednesday 9:00 AM George Vlantis MAC ST Microelectronics 897, 89920 Wednesday 1:30 PM Robert Ward Y SciCom 95321 Wednesday 2:30 PM Dongjun Lee Y Samsung 917, 918, 919, 920, 92122 Wednesday 4:00 PM Joseph Levy Y InterDigital 932, 93323 Wednesday 5:00 PM Alexandre Dias Y Motorola 912,91324 Thursday 8:00 AM Heejung Yu PHY ETRI 922, 923, 925, 92725 Thursday 9:00 AM Sean Coffey Y TI 886, 877, 93526 Thursday 10:30 AM John Ketchum Y Qualcomm 870, 871, 872, 87327 Thursday 11:30 AM Takashi Fukagawa Y Panasonic 907, 908, 95628 Thursday 1:30 PM Jung Yee Y Icefyre 88229 Thursday 2:30 PM Aleksandar Purkovic Y Nortel 884, 88530 Thursday 4:00 PM Pagan Ting Y ITRI 926, 930, 93131 Thursday 5:00 PM Hiroyuki Nakase Y Tohoku University 91032 Thursday 7:30 PM Kim Wu PHY Inprocomm 878
Time Slot
September 2004
James D. Allen, Appairent Technologies Slide 5
doc.: IEEE 802.15-0544r0
Submission
November Agenda Challenge
• Panel Discussion• Possible inclusion of one or more additional
complete proposal • Extended presentation and Q&A time for
completes• Additional technical presentations anticipated• Need to refresh audience memory
September 2004
James D. Allen, Appairent Technologies Slide 6
doc.: IEEE 802.15-0544r0
Submission
Elimination vote.Eliminate proposalwith least support.
A
Procedure End
Any newmergers?
Recess to allowmerger granted at
option of TG.Presentation of
merged proposals.
Discard un-merged partial
proposals.
Final 5 minutestatement.
25% low-barElimination vote
75% for ?
Any Mergerstake place?
Presentation of allremainingproposals
More than 1proposal left?
Panel Discussionat option of the
chair
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Roll-callconfirmation vote
Statements fromno voters of why
they voted no.
Response byproposers.
Roll-callconfirmation vote75% for ?
N
N
Bring back lastthree proposalsN
Adopt proposal asinitial technical
specification
Editor preparesDraft 1.0. Vote that
it is technicallyconsistent withtechnical spec.
75% for ?
Forward Draft 1.0to WG for Letter
Ballot
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Step 9
Step 10
Step 12
60 minutepresentation of
remainingproposals
including Q & A
Step 16
Step17
Step 18
Step 19Step 20
Step 21
Drawing by Adrian StephensSeptember 16, 2003
Initial 60 Minutespresentation for all
proposals.Panel discussion.
Step 7
Step 8
Mergers maytake place.The TG maydecide timerequired forconsideration ofnew mergers
Step 11
Step 14 More than 1proposal left?
N
Step 15
The remainingproposals mayundergo technicalchanges withoutrequiring amerge.
Step 13
The remainingproposals mayundergo technicalchanges withoutrequiring amerge.
Step 13
The remainingproposals may
undergo technicalchanges without
requiring amerge.
Step 13
Step 11
Mergers maytake place.The TG maydecide timerequired forconsideration ofnew mergers
Mergers maytake place.
The TG maydecide timerequired for
consideration ofnew mergers
Step 11
Selection Process 665r9You
Are here
September 2004
James D. Allen, Appairent Technologies Slide 7
doc.: IEEE 802.15-0544r0
Submission
A
N
Y
Step 9
Step 10
Step 12
Step 7Step 8
Step 11
Step 13
Selection Process 665r9
Recess to allow merger granted at option of TG. Presentation of merged proposals.
Mergers may take place. The TG may decide time required for consideration of new mergers.
The remaining proposals may undergo technical changes without requiring a merge.
Initial 60 minutes presentation for all proposals. Panel discussion.
Discard unmerged partial proposals.
Final 5 minute statement. 25% low-bar Elimination vote.
Any new mergers?
60 minute presentation of remaining proposals..
Note this
By Nov 4th
September 2004
James D. Allen, Appairent Technologies Slide 8
doc.: IEEE 802.15-0544r0
Submission
My Comments: Interesting points:• Well run• Partial proposals are ~ irrelevant – 2 ½ camps• 802.15.3 was presented by Allen as an
independent proposal• Many techniques included data aggregation• Many techniques included increasing band to 40
MHz. • Working with .11, .15 and .19 leadership to make
sure .15 has some say as to how channels are bonded and how coexistence is optimized – more later.
• Heard that up to 680 Mbps was proposed