Transcript

Noticeable Results in

Bureaucratic Simplification for Citizens

Michel Savelkoul

IRRC Nov 17, Berlin

Some facts

Total AB Citizen the Netherlands (16 mln): • 110 mln hours• € 1,275 billion out of pocket costs

– We measured 165 laws and regulations with AB for citizens (=20% of the total number of information obligations)

Baseline measurement: 4-5 months

– Regulations with the highest number of AB were: Income Tax Act: 15 mln hours and € 156 mlnPassport Act: 12.7 mln hours and € 18 mlnRoad Traffic Act 12.5 mln hours and € 174 mlnBut also Voting Act: 3.3 mln hours and € 79.000

How did we measure?

– Standard Cost Model for Citizens measures in:• Time in hours• Out of pocket costs in € (e.g. notary, travel costs,

stamps) in Euros

– Research among citizens on number of contacts and perception

Identified the 20% of most burdensome legislationPareto principle: 20% legislation causes 80% ABRequires a list of all public services!)Insight in problem areas and reduction possibilitiesInsight in specific groups with large amount of AB

! People find time more burdensome than costs (in Euros)

Approach 2007-2011

– Bureaucratic Simplification is part of service delivery

– New focus on solutions that matter -> reduction of burdens relating to top ten annoyances of citizens

– Working together with the local government (new target in Coalition Agreement: -25% of local admin. burden for citizens)

– Reduction of AB of professionals: teachers, policemen, medical staff, etc.

– Quantification (SCM) mainly to monitor:• Departmental admin burden ceilings and new legislation• Consequences for the admin burden of target groups

How to make a difference?

Top 10 solutions (1):

1. Fast and secure service: waiting time will be transparent and shorter

2. Simple application and accountability with social security

3. Single provision of data: all income-related arrangements in one personal internet page

4. Passports are easily obtainable

5. Reduction of permits, towards general rules

How to make a difference? (2)

Top 10 solutions (2):

6. Comprehensible language in forms

7. More trust: more free-of-accountability budgets

8. Mediation

9. Volunteer work: treated like citizens, not enterprises

10. Quality of services: 7/10

Disability benefit claimant

– Lost part of his leg due to diabetes

– Unemployed due to his illness

– Administrative burdensrelate to: • Getting a new driving licence• Claiming benefits

• Burdens of Michiel can be quantified (using SCM) and qualified

Disability benefit claimant

– Lost part of his leg due to diabetes

– Unemployed due to his illness

– Administrative burdensrelate to: • Getting a new driving licence• Claiming benefits

• Burdens of Michiel can be quantified (using SCM) and qualified

How to show the difference?

Roadmaps

What did we learn?

• OECD report February 2007: AB reduction should not be politically neutral!

• Local/regional governments must be included to get noticeable results

• A quantitative reduction target “works” for politicians and civil servants, qualitative reductions “work” for citizens • Quantitative AB burden ceilings keep pressure on

ministries • But: quantitative target can also lead to“perverse

effects”:• Dead wood will be cut first• Hardly any political difficult reductions are made• Decentralisation of tasks reduce burdens only on

national level• Less people entitled to benefit: less AB!

• As a consequence, people hardly notice progress!

Conditions for success: combine quality with quantity

– Focus on real issues that matter for citizens

– Make a top ten of measurable and noticeable (for political debate) reductions (on the level of

central/decentralised government and role models)

– Get political support in government and parliament for this top ten

– Independent watchdog `Actal´

– Departmental admin burden ceilings for a net result

– Awareness: citizen perspective central: ask citizens whether they notice the reductions

– Make it fun! : museum of needless policies

Thank you for your attention!

For more information:

– www.whatarelief.eu

– Michel Savelkoul [email protected]+31 70 426 6543

– Peter Rem

[email protected]+31 70 426 7487

What do citizens want?

• Less administrative burdens (bureaucracy)

• One front office (‘no wrong door’)

• Easy access to the right information

• One-off data delivery

• An ‘easy’ relationship while interacting

• Good treatment by government (‘be taken seriously’)