7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
1/49
Public Economics
Principles and Practice
Part Ten
Multi-Government Systems
Peter AbelsonApplied Economics
and University of Sydney
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
2/49
Multi-Government Systems
Multilevel Government
Globalisation and Government
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
3/49
Chapter 33
Multilevel Government
Allocation of Functions in a Multilevel
System
Optimal Size of Local Governments
Taxation with Multilevel Governments
Household Choices and Local
Government Intergovernmental Transfers
Multilevel Government in Australia
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
4/49
Tiers of Government
Multilevel government exists in centralised
states as well as in federations.
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
5/49
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
6/49
Distributional policies
Mainly central government responsibility. Only central government can achieve horizontal
equity across country.
Sub-national redistribution may be ineffective andcounter-productive.
However most local communities want
(legitimately) to have some redistributionprograms.
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
7/49
Allocation functions: public goods
Decentralisation theorem: Decentralisation
maximises economic welfare by equilibrating
supply of services to demand.
Subsidiarity principle: Subject to cost
considerations, public services should be
supplied by the level of government closest to
the users of the service.
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
8/49
Decentralisation theorem
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
9/49
Problems with shared responsibilities
Major problems can arise when different
levels of government share
responsibilities.
r.g in health and education.
This is hard to avoid in federations but
also in centralised countries.
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
10/49
Optimal Size of Local Governments
Considerations similar to those for supply of publicgoods. Diversity of preferences points to small areas.
Cost efficiency points to larger areas.
One problem: optimal size may vary by type of publicgood provided.
There is a shortage of empirical studies. Most studies of costs of services in areas of different sizes focus
on technical possibilities rather than behavioural factors.
There are few studies of effects of area size on demand andpreference satisfaction.
More research is needed.
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
11/49
Taxation with Multilevel
Governments Criteria for taxes:
Distributional (equity) objectives
Allocative efficiency (minimise deadweight losses)
Fiscal adequacy.
Accountability.
Two problems Central taxes best meet first two criteria, but this
creates problems for other two criteria. There are limited tax bases (income, consumption
and wealth) so tax bases may have to be shared.
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
12/49
Fitting taxes to economic functions
Income redistribution function of central governmentimplies that central government should have access toincome tax.
Sub-national government provision of local goodsrequires that it should have access to a major tax base.
But two problems arise
Mobility of tax base Externalities
Both create deadweight losses.
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
13/49
Sub-national taxes and efficiency
Taxes that are efficient at national level may causedeadweight losses at local level because of mobility ofresources. See areas ABC in Figure 33.3.
Evidence suggests that: Location of consumption is sensitive to consumption taxes and
do cuse deadweight losses.
Decentralised taxes create tax competition to attractresources. This is efficient if taxes reflect marginal costs.
It is inefficient if it reduces tax base of other areas and theirrevenue by more than the related expenses.
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
14/49
Deadweight losses of local taxes
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
15/49
Vertical fiscal imbalance
VFI occurs when central government raises morerevenue than it needs and sun-national governmentrasies less than it needs.
Problems include: Over-spending by central government with weak constraints.
Over-spending by sub-national governments provided withexternal funds.
Central conditions on grants to sub-national governments that do
not satisfy local preferences. Reduced opportunity for beneficial impacts of sub-national fiscal
competition.
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
16/49
Equity issues
Sub-national governments cannot tax progressivelybecause they would lose part of their tax base.
Horizontal fiscal imbalance. Sub-national governments
cannot provide equal public services.
Note however that markets may offset HFI. Propertyprices capitalise all (or most) of the value of public
services. House prices are lower in local areas thatprovide fewer public services. Therefore there is limited ifany HFI.
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
17/49
Taxing the same tax base
VFI and intergovernmental transfers can be avoided ifdifferent levels of government can share the tax base.
This occurs to some extent in U.S. and Canada.
Theory suggests that sharing a tax base may increasetax rates because externality effects are ignored.
Evidence is mixed on this.
However complications and inefficiencies can arise if thetax bases and rate structures are inconsistent.
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
18/49
Household Choices and Local
Government Tiebout hypothesis: if there are many competing local
governments and households are mobile, localgovernments will efficiently provide the local goods thathouseholds want.
These conditions and outcomes may occur in U.S. butnot in Australia.
Tiebout also requires that local jurisdictions can exclude
low income households who would not pay their share ofcosts of public services. This exclusionary implicationmay not be equitable.
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
19/49
Intergovernmental Transfers
Intergovernmental transfers may be: revenue sharing or
intergovernmental grants.
Intergovernmental grants may be: General purpose grants or
Special purpose (tied or conditional) grants.
Special purpose grants may be Matching or
Non-matching grants.
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
20/49
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
21/49
Special purpose grants
Tied grants are intended to influence service delivery.
If tied grant (unmatched) is less than recipients initial expenditureon a service, it is in effect an income grant, though it may affect
some service features.
If tied grant is matched grant, this changes relative prices andcreates a substitution effect. It is more likely to increaseconsumption of a service than an unmatched grant of similar size.
Tied grants more likely to have deadweight loss than untied grantsin that they force a change away from local preferences.
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
22/49
Effects of special purpose grants
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
23/49
Multilevel Government in Australia
Very high VFI and high level of intergovernmental grants.Nearly 60% as general grants determined by CGC and
just over 40% in 90 specific purpose grants.
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
24/49
Issues in Australian Federalism
VFI lack of fiscal responsibility of central and stategovernments.
State taxes are inefficient and inequitable as well as
limited. This is partly because they administer land andpayroll taxes inefficiently.
Central government block grants (based on flawed CGCmethodology) are inefficient and inequitable.
An excessive number of inefficient SPPs.
Too many local (or state) governments?
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
25/49
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
26/49
The Nature of Globalisation
Globalisation means the worldwide integration of
markets in product and factor markets. It is driven by
technical change and political decisions.
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
27/49
Four dimensions of globalisation
1. International trade. Since 1945, international tradein goods and services has grown at twice rate ofworld output.
2. Financial market integration (foreign direct
investment in physical capital and financial/portfolioinvestment). In last 20 years cross-border flows ofcapital increased four times as fast as world output.
3. Production systems internationalised with changes
in transport, logistics and communications and firmsoperate in more than one country.
4. Use of international standards and law as the basisof the global economic system.
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
28/49
Four measures of scale of globalisation
1. Cross-border transactions. International trade as aproportion of world output is the simplest generalmeasure of globalisation.
2. Stocks of capital. Capital ownership (portfolioinvestment and FDI) at any point in time showsopenness of the economy.
3. Price equalisation. Prices become more equal
between countries as transport costs fall and marketsare more integrated.
4. Transaction impediments. Examples are tariffs, quotasand capital controls, or risk premiums that reflect
political instability.
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
29/49
Measures of globalisation (cont.)
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
30/49
Globalisation, Output and Prices
Four drivers of increased output and welfare
Increased trade based on comparative advantage.
Lower transport costs increase competition, lowersprices, and encourages economies of scale.
Globalisation of finance allows capital to be employed in
the most productive opportunities and reduces interestcosts.
Integrated production systems enable multinational firmsto deliver their goods into each market at least cost.
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
31/49
Theorem of comparative advantage
Both parties to trade can benefit if one party hascomparative advantage in the production of some
good(s).
Table 34.2, Australia has comparative advantage (lower
opportunity cost) in producing wheat, China in cloth.
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
32/49
The evidence on output
Time series: integration of global marketsgreater and rate of world economic growthhigher in 1990s than in any previous decade ofthe 20th century.
Cross sectional analysis. Open economies
achieve higher rates of growth (Chapter 5 andvarious studies).
e.g., Edwards, 1998, positive relationship betweengrowth in total factor productivity and nine measuresof openness for most countries.
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
33/49
Distributional Consequences
of Globalisation
How does globalisation affect owners of capital and naturalresources, skilled and unskilled workers, and consumers?
Theory suggests trade equalises product and factor prices intrading countries subject to transport costs.
Abundant factors in an economy gain from trade; scarce factorslose.
Thus wages of skilled workers in rich countries and of unskilled
workers in poor countries rise. Wages of unskilled workers in rich countries and of skilled workers
in poor countries fall.
This process continues until the ratio of skilled to unskilled wages isthe same in rich and poor countries (subject to equal access tocapital and no transport costs).
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
34/49
Distributional consequences (cont.)
Thus trade increases wage dispersion in rich countries,but reduces it in poor countries.
With free capital movement, the marginal return tocapital rises because capital can move to the mostproductive opportunities.
Consumers generally gain from globalisation.
But globalisation does not eliminate all transport costsand other barriers to factors and product movements.
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
35/49
Three critical issues
Although globalisation reduces real wages of unskilledworkers in rich countries, there are usually compensatingfactors. More demand from high skilled workers; lowerimport prices; increased government revenue andservices.
Unskilled labour in poor countries dont benefit if they arenot part of global system for one of other reason. Note controversy about multinationals and real wages.
Rules of globalisation reflects political forces and suitrich countries. Examples: agriculture, pharmaceuticals.
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
36/49
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
37/49
Globalisation and Government
Revenue
Does globalisation affect total government revenueand its composition? Three factors.
1. Increased mobility of capital and labour means thatgovernments must provide competitive (low) taxrates to attract or retain productive factors.
2. Modern technology facilitates worldwide movementof money and tax evasion, but also facilitatesmonitoring of financial transactions.
3. Tariff reductions reduce taxes on trade but tariffs are
a small part of revenue in developed countries.
G t d
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
38/49
Government revenues and
globalisation (cont.)
Globalisation has not reduced tax revenue as proportion of GDP.
Government revenues are generally higher in countries with openeconomies.
Corporate tax rates have fallen (Table 34.3), but some concessions (e.g.investment credits) tightened.
Overall taxes on labour have not fallen, but tax structures have become lessprogressive.
Consumption taxes have risen.
User charges may also be expected to increase, for example for road use,education, health services and so on. Both phenomena have occurred.
Taxes on land and wealth have not changed much.
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
39/49
Tax competition and efficiency
Does tax competition affect economic efficiency?
When capital is mobile across jurisdictions, the marginal social cost oftaxation includes loss of output when capital moves abroad. Althoughthis produces a positive externality to foreign jurisdictions, the taxingjurisdiction ignores this externality and sets a lower tax rate. This mayresult in an under provision of public goods by government.
This model assumes that income from capital is taxed at its sourcerather than at its destination.
If income is taxed according to the destination principal, a residentsworldwide capital income is taxed at the same rate, regardless of its
source. The worldwide allocation of capital, and hence productionefficiency, is independent of local tax rates.
However, due to lack of cooperation between tax authorities, worldwideincome cannot be monitored completely.
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
40/49
Tax competition and efficiency (cont.)
In Australia, most income is taxed under thedestination principle. Law-abiding owners ofcapital have no tax incentive to move capitaloverseas. But this is a strong assumption!
The Australian government also taxes incomefrom Australian sources that accrues to non-residents. Thus the Australian system has asource based element, which may discourageforeign capital and distort the worldwideallocation of capital and productive efficiency.
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
41/49
Globalisation and
Government Expenditure
Text identifies four main economic determinants of expenditure (income,demographics, welfare needs, and production costs) and four politicalfactors (political ideology, political and bureaucratic discretion, and interestgroups).
Two factors may increase expenditure.
Impact of globalisation on welfare needs. Increased activity of interest groups.
On the other hand, Globalisation may reduce capacity of government to raise revenue.
Also increased competition may reduce production costs.
Globalisation may therefore increase or decrease government expenditure,depending on which expenditure drivers are most influential.
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
42/49
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
43/49
Government expenditure: evidence
It is difficult to separate the influences of globalisation and politics ongovernment spending.
Overall studies find that both total expenditure and the share ofwelfare expenditure has increased and appears to be associatedwith globalisation.
It appears that governments can accommodate these demandsdespite the constraints on taxation due to more mobile factors.
The net impact of globalisation on spending is either a slight positive
effect or a neutral one.
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
44/49
Globalisation and Government
Policies
Globalisation has reduced government macroeconomicdiscretion. Governments cannot easily control cross-bordercapital movements.
Implications Monetary policy: with free capital movements, governments cannot
set both interest rates and the exchange rate.
Fiscal policy: budget deficits that financial markets judgeinflationary may produce capital flight, higher interest rates and afall in the exchange rate.
However markets have always punished unsustainable policiessuch as structurally over-valued exchange rates or persistent largebudget deficits. What is new is the speed.
Government regulation of industry is also more restricted. Firmsare less easily coerced.
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
45/49
Globalisation and government policies
(cont.)
On the other hand the need for competition
policy is reduced, e.g in telephone service where
there is now a variety of electronic means and
many competitive pressures.
Also government has gained power through
technology, e.g. genetic screening, monitoring
traffic etc. Strictly, this reflects technology ratherthan globalisation.
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
46/49
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
47/49
International agreements (cont.)
Any government that wants good international relationsand the benefits of international trade must accept somelimitations on its ability to act autonomously.
Australian High Court has ruled that Australian laws areinvalid if they conflict with United Nations treatiesentered into by the Commonwealth Government.
These treaties do restrict Australian Governmentdecisions, e.g. use of resources in Kakadu NationalPark, the Barrier Reef and in Tasmania.
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
48/49
Globalisation and government
policies: summary
Integrated economic markets put pressure on
national governments to align their economic
policies those of other countries and restrict a
governments macroeconomic and industrypolicy options.
The strength of the tendency towards policy
convergence depends on a countrys share ofglobal trade and capital flows and its size.
Gl b li ti d t
7/27/2019 Multi-government systems
49/49
Globalisation and government
policies: summary (concluded)
But globalisation has not prevented governmentsfrom conducting many policies of choice.
Governments still determine the level and pattern ofpublic spending. They often adopt mechanisms tooffset the efficiency effects of globalisation.
Technology has increased governments power in
various ways.
Globalisation is not about to eliminate the nationstate.