Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
Quaternary slip history of the Mill Creek strand of the San Andreas Fault in San Gorgonio Pass, southern California: implications for regional fault interaction
by
Kendrick, Matti and Mahan
1
12345
6
7
8
9
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
ABSTRACT
An alluvial complex within the Mission Creek drainage records fault-activity history
of the Mill Creek strand of the San Andreas Fault in the San Gorgonio Pass region. We
have investigated six surface remnants using detailed geologic mapping, morphometric
and stratigraphic analysis, geochronology of fills (IRSL) and pedogenic analysis. The
surfaces cap distinct alluvial fills having clasts that can be associated with sources in the
Mission Creek drainage in the nearby San Bernardino Mountains. We have distinguished
and correlated the disconnected surface remnants on the basis of morphometric analysis,
including their longitudinal profiles, surface texture and drainage density. The degree of
soil-profile development constrains the timing of initiation of movement along the Mill
Creek strand of the San Andreas Fault, when compared to other regional pedons that have
been independently dated. Pedogenic properties useful for age appraisals include soil-
development and rubification indices, and increase in clay volume. Correlation to
regional, independently dated soil profiles indicates that the oldest surfaces in the
Mission Creek drainage are significantly older than 500 ka, though this age range (>500
ka) that is particularly difficult to constrain with available geochronologic methods. IRSL
dates of 106 and 95 Ka from (respectively) 5 and 4 m beneath a younger pedon are
consistent with age estimates based on soil-profile development. The oldest surfaces in
this fan complex occur on deposits emplaced prior to movement along the Mill Creek
strand, and have been displaced approximately 8 km from their source across both the
Mill Creek and Mission Creek fault strands in San Gorgonio Pass. This is the same as a
total slip estimate for the Mill Creek strand based on the restoration of the displaced
drainage system Hell-For-Sure, North Fork Whitewater Rivers with South Fork
Whitewater River (7.1 – 8.7 km), as well as offset lithologic markers within the San
2
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
Gabriel Mountains type crystalline bedrock (less than 10 km). The congruence of these
measurements suggests that no dextral motion occurred on the Mission Creek strand
since the deposition of these units. The youngest deposits within this complex
accumulated following cessation of movement along both the Mission Creek and Mill
Creek strands, and mark the time after which slip had transferred onto the Banning and
Garnet Hill strands. Displacement of the Mill Creek strand by the Pinto Mountain Fault
provides a short-term slip rate of 10 - 12.5 mm/yr for this fault, and an average longer-
term slip rate of approximately 2 to 2.5 mm/yr. Uplift of the Yucaipa Ridge block during
period of activity of the Mill Creek strand has been ~ 2.3 to 2.6 mm/yr. Between
approximately 500 to 100 ka, the Mill Creek strand had a slip rate of 18 to 22 mm/yr.
INTRODUCTION
Statement of problem
The San Gorgonio Pass region of southern California marks the junction between the
Mojave Desert and Coachella Valley segments of the San Andreas Fault (Fig. 1). The
segments have a left-stepping geometry, with the Mojave Desert segment stepped left
(west) about 15 km from the Coachella Valley segment (Matti and others, 1985, 1992;
Matti and Morton, 1993). The left step occurs in the San Gorgonio Pass region, where
complex structural relations have formed a structural knot in the San Andreas Fault.
Over the last million years or so, this knot has influenced the evolution of the entire plate-
boundary system in southern California, including (1) sequential development of multiple
San Andreas Fault strands in San Gorgonio Pass, (2) initiation of the dextral San Jacinto
3
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
Fault west and south of the Pass region, and (3) integration of the Eastern California
Shear Zone into the Quaternary San Andreas Fault system.
For these reasons, the time-space history of the San Andreas Fault in San Gorgonio
Pass is critical not only to understanding the modern seismotectonic framework of the
southern San Andreas Fault system, but also to evaluating how various components of
that system have interacted since inception of the San Andreas Fault proper in Pliocene
time (~5 Ma). Previous workers have outlined key elements of this time-space history
(Allen, 1957; Matti and others, 1985, 1992; Matti and Morton, 1993; Yule and Sieh,
2003), and the modern San Andreas in San Gorgonio Pass region recently has been the
focus of considerable debate among seismologists concerned with fault-rupture scenarios
and attendant seismic risk (e.g., Yule, 2009, 2010). Despite this recent interest, little is
known about the Quaternary slip history for the San Andreas Fault in the San Gorgonio
Pass region, particularly with respect to other dextral faults like the San Jacinto Fault that
participate in the Quaternary strain budget within the southern San Andreas Fault system.
We address this issue by investigating the slip history for the Mill Creek strand of the San
Andreas Fault, using geologic relations that occur in the Mission Creek and Raywood
Flat areas of San Gorgonio Pass (Fig. 2).
San Andreas Fault Zone
Fault nomenclature
Nomenclature for the San Andreas Fault in southern California is as complex as the
fault’s geologic setting and movement history. Nowhere is this complexity greater than
in San Gorgonio Pass. Here, early investigators (Vaughan, 1922; Allen, 1957; Dibblee,
1964, 1968a, 1975) mapped multiple fault strands, but their significance and structural
4
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
role within the overall San Andreas zone were not obvious. Later workers (Ehlig, 1977;
Farley, 1979; Matti and others, 1982, 1983) recognized that differences among
regionally-persistent crystalline-rock packages can be used to distinguish faults having
major right-slip displacement. These distinctions led researchers to formalize multiple
strands of the San Andreas Fault in the vicinity of San Gorgonio Pass (Fig. 2; Matti and
others, 1985, 1992; Matti and Morton, 1993). These strands developed sequentially (Fig.
3), and represent the full history of Pliocene-Quaternary slip on the San Andreas Fault in
southern California since its inception (Matti and Morton, 1993). Following Matti and
others (1992), in the San Gorgonio Pass region we refer to faults of the San Andreas zone
as strands, including the Mission Creek strand, Mill Creek strand, San Bernardino strand,
and Banning strand (fig. 2). Because these terms are cumbersome, for convenience we
commonly refer to them only by their specific names (e.g., Mill Creek strand, San
Bernardino strand); moreover, we use the terms “strand” and “fault” interchangeably,
without changing the intrinsic concept that each structure is a strand of the parent San
Andreas Fault.
Mission Creek and Mill Creek strands
In terms of total dextral slip, the Mission Creek strand is the main San Andreas strand
in southern California. In San Gorgonio Pass the Mission Creek strand has
approximately 90 km of dextral slip, and juxtaposes far-traveled crystalline rocks of San
Gabriel Mountains-type against crystalline rocks of Mojave Desert-type (Fig. 2; Matti
and others, 1992; Matti and Morton, 1993).
The Mill Creek strand lies north of, and subparallel to, the Mission Creek strand (Fig.
2). Although some workers attribute significant dextral slip to the fault (e.g., Dibblee,
5
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
1968a, 1975, 1982a), and this pathway for fault motion is often used in geophysical and
computer modeling (e.g. Plesch, et al., 2007; Spinler et al., 2010), it probably has no
more than ~7-8 km of slip, displacing a narrow slice of Mojave Desert-type basement
northwestward away from the San Gorgonio Mountain block (Matti and others, 1983,
1985, 1992). This slice coincides with Yucaipa Ridge structural block of Spotila and
others (1998, 2001). In San Gorgonio Pass, neither the Mill Creek nor Mission Creek
strands has generated dextral slip in late Quaternary time, although the Mill Creek strand
is the most recently active of the two (Fig. 3; Matti and Morton, 1993).
San Bernardino, Banning, and Garnet Hill strands, and San Gorgonio Pass Fault zone
The San Bernardino strand of the San Andreas Fault along the southwestern base of
the San Bernardino Mountains and the Banning and Garnet Hill strands in the Coachella
Valley represent modern neotectonic strands of the San Andreas Fault in southern
California. These three faults approach the San Gorgonio Pass region from the northwest
and southeast, respectively (Figs. 1, 2), but as Allen (1957) demonstrated, none of them
can be mapped continuously through San Gorgonio Pass in a way that convincingly
demonstrates their geometric connections and kinematic interactions. Building on
Allen’s findings, Matti and others (1985; 1992; Matti and Morton, 1993) proposed that
relations among dextral faults in San Gorgonio Pass have been complicated and obscured
by a belt of contractional deformation, mapped as the San Gorgonio Pass Fault zone.
This fault zone intervenes between the Banning and Garnet Hill strands (to the southeast)
and the San Bernardino strand (to the northwest), and has obscured throughgoing
relations among the dextral faults.
6
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
Focus of Investigation
This investigation focuses on two locations along the trace of the Mill Creek fault
strand, Upper Raywood Flat and the Mission Creek alluvial complex. Reconstruction of
drainage systems through Upper Raywood Flat allows for the determination of total slip
on the Mill Creek strand of the San Andreas Fault. Deposits within the Mission Creek
alluvial complex, located within the present Mission Creek drainage basin, constrain the
timing of movement of this fault strand. We use geologic mapping, geomorphic analysis,
pedogenesis, and optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) to reconstruct the geologic
history of this region over the past million years. The results of this research have
implications for the slip histories of both the Mill Creek strand of the San Andreas Fault
and the Pinto Mountain fault.
REGIONAL GEOLOGIC AND GEOMORPHIC SETTING
Crystalline basement rocks
Although Allen (1957) grouped crystalline rocks north and south of the Mission
Creek fault strand within his “San Gorgonio igneous and metamorphic complex”, he
noted that rocks south of the fault include distinctive lithologies not found to the north.
Later workers in San Gorgonio Pass (Ehlig, 1977; Farley, 1979; Matti and others, 1982,
1983) recognized that rocks south of the Mission Creek Fault are similar to those in the
San Gabriel Mountains, whereas those to the north are similar to rocks of the Mojave
Desert (Fig. 4). Coming from the other direction, Dillon (1975) correlated crystalline
rocks in San Gorgonio Pass with rocks in the Chocolate Mountains on the northeast side
of the Coachella Valley segment of the San Andreas Fault. Thus, contrasts in crystalline
rocks on either side of the Mission Creek Fault indicate that it is a major strand of the San
7
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
Andreas, and correlates with the Mojave Desert segment of the San Andreas Fault north
of the San Gabriel Mountains (Fig. 4).
Geomorphic setting
The landscape of the San Gorgonio Pass region reflects the complexity of the fault
history. Spotila and others (1998) sought to understand this landscape by defining
structural blocks throughout the San Gorgonio Pass. In the region of this investigation,
they defined four structural blocks. To the north of the Mill Creek strand they identified
the San Gorgonio block. This block is characterized by high relief, and tilting to the
north, as constrained by the slope on an ancient geomorphic surface (Spotila and Sieh,
2000). This block is separated from the Santa Ana Valley block further to the north by
unnamed, high-angle faults, mapped by Sadler (1993). The San Gorgonio block has been
described as being deformed into an east-west elongate dome (Spotila et al., 1998, Sadler,
1993, Dibblee, 1964). The boundary between the San Gorgonio and Santa Ana Valley
blocks is not complete to the east, however, where the unnamed, high-angle faults do not
continue. Spotila and others define two blocks between the Mill Creek and Mission
Creek strands, which comprise a high, narrow ridgeline, shown as Yucaipa Ridge on
topographic maps. Wilson Creek block is at the west end of this ridge, and the east is
named the Yucaipa Ridge block (Spotila et al., 1998). These are separated by the
ancestral Wilson Creek strand, proposed by Matti and Morton (1993) to have been active
prior to the inception of movement on the Mission Creek strand (Fig. 3). The Morongo
block, as defined by Spotila and others, is located south of Yucaipa Ridge, and bound to
the north by the San Bernardino and Mission Creek strands, and to the south by the San
Gorgonio Pass Thrust Fault (Spotila et al., 1998).
8
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
We follow the nomenclature and defined boundaries for the northern blocks of
Spotila and others. We define three blocks (Fig. 5) within the bounds of their Morongo
block, as follows. The Pisgah Peak block is bound on the north and east by the San
Bernardino strand and to the south by the San Gorgonio Pass Thrust Fault. The Kitching
Peak block is bound on the north by the Mission Creek strand, on the west by the San
Bernardino strand, and on the east by the Whitewater Fault. The Devil’s Garden block is
to the east of the Whitewater Fault, and is bound to the south by the Banning strand, and
to the north by the Mission Creek and Mill Creek strands. The eastern extent of this
block is masked by sediments of the Coachella Valley.
Helium thermochronology and fission track measurements suggest that these blocks
have experienced differing uplift histories (Spotila et al., 1998; Spotila et al., 2001;
Blythe et al., 2002). Yucaipa Ridge, including the Yucaipa Ridge and Wilson Creek
blocks, has experienced between 3-4 km of uplift in the most recent several million years,
and 1-2 km in the past 1.5 Ma (Spotila et al., 2001). The denudation rates that result from
this modeled uplift history agree well with the shorter-term denudation rates determined
using cosmogenic 10Be concentrations (Binnie et al., 2008). This uplift of Yucaipa Ridge
is significantly greater than that experienced by the blocks to the north and south.
METHODS
Geologic mapping for this investigation was conducted at a scale of 1:24,000 or
larger, mainly using traverse-mapping techniques. From the locality where a map unit or
its boundaries initially was identified or defined, it was extended to other areas through a
mapping process that includes direct outcrop observation and aerial-photographic
9
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
interpretation. Map-unit boundaries (geologic contacts; in some cases faults) identified
along mapping traverses typically were extended laterally by using aerial photographs
and binoculars to project or extrapolate the boundary to its next identified occurrence
along a nearby traverse; faults that cut the units were extended laterally in the same
manner. Only rarely were individual geologic contacts or fault lines walked out to
determine their variability and character throughout the map area. For surficial units,
bounding contacts were plotted digitally from rectified and georeferenced 2005-vintage
NAIP aerial photographs that allow location accuracy equivalent to the accuracy standard
for the topographic-contour base.
Soils were described on selected surfaces within the Mission Creek alluvial complex,
after established methods (Schoeneberger et al., 2002; Birkeland, 1999). Laboratory
analysis was performed on collected samples, and included particle size determined by
pipette and wet-sieving methods. Profile development indices (Harden, 1982) and
rubification indices (Torrent, et al., 1980) were determined for each of these soil pedons,
as well as for three pedons previously described by McFadden (1982) within this region.
Within the Mission Creek alluvial complex, surface texture, including drainage
density, and post-depositional incision were determined using a series of lateral profiles,
constructed from a 10-m DEM. Long profiles were used to determine uplift and tilting.
Stream profiles were constructed and analyzed for discontinuities and knickpoints (for a
discussion see Wobus et al., 2006).
Samples for optical dating were taken by hammering a 5-cm interior diameter and 40
to 50 cm length of PVC tubing into profile walls. Optical ages were determined on the
fine-grained (4-11), polymineral fraction of the inner portion of the sample, using
10
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
multiple aliquot techniques (Singhvi et al., 1982; Lang, 1994; Richardson et al., 1997;
Forman and Pierson, 2002) with infrared excitation. The fine-grained silt separate of
representative samples was isolated and dated using multiple aliquot techniques. To
determine dose rate, the U and Th content of sediment, assuming secular equilibrium in
the decay series, were determined by high-resolution gamma spectrometry (Ge detector)
at the USGS, Denver for all of the samples. The cosmic ray components of 0.11 to 0.09
mGy/yr (appropriate to depth and elevation) were included in the estimated dose rate
(Prescott and Hutton, 1994). These cosmic components were trivial and only accounted
for up to 1 to 2 percent of the dose rate. A measure of moisture content was determined
by laboratory measurement of complete saturation moisture content for each sample, then
half of the calculated total moisture was used as an estimate of average moisture over the
life of the sample.
RESULTS
Mission Creek and Mill Creek Strands of the San Andreas Fault
The Mission Creek and Mill Creek strands in the Mission Creek study area are
associated with an extensive zone of crushed and sheared crystalline rock. Discrete fault
planes are associated with this zone, in places occurring within it or bounding it to either
side or bounding it only on the northeast. None of these appears to break Holocene or
late Pleistocene surficial deposits. Southeastward into the Coachella Valley the broad
crush zone diverges valleyward from the mountain front, and here neither vintage aerial
photographs nor LiDAR data (Bevis and others, 2005) reveals evidence of faults in
alluvial deposits of any age (Matti and others, 1985, 1992).
11
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
Our interpretation of fault patterns in the Mission Creek area differs in two ways from
that of Matti and others (1982, 1983):
Position of main San Andreas strand southeast of Whitewater River
Southeast of Whitewater River, two features influenced where Matti and others
(1982, 1983) positioned the main strand of the San Andreas Fault (Mission Creek strand;
Fig. 6): (1) the extensive crush zone developed in crystalline rocks of San Gabriel
Mountains-type and (2) the slice of volcanic-clast-bearing sedimentary rocks that Allen
(1957, pl. 1) correlated with his Deformed Gravels of Whitewater River. Our mapping of
these two features leads us to position Mission Creek strand differently than proposed by
Matti and others (1982, 1983).
Those workers (Matti and others, 1982, 1983) reasoned that the broad zone of
crushed and sheared crystalline rock represents pervasive distributed shear within the
movement zone of a major fault. Accordingly, they associated the entire crush zone with
the Mission Creek strand, rather than linking the strand to a specific mapped fault.
Earlier, Allen (1957) had mapped a fault between the crush zone and the volcanic-clast-
bearing sedimentary rocks; although he does not discuss this structure, he must not have
viewed it as important given his tentative correlation of the volcanic-clast-bearing unit
with the nearby Deformed Gravels of Whitewater River. Matti and others (1982)
interpreted this boundary as a depositional contact, implying that the volcanic-clast-
bearing sedimentary unit laps over the broad crush zone (Fig. 6). Whatever relationship
exists between the crush zone and this unit, the main San Andreas strand (Mission Creek
strand) must occur between it and basement rocks in the San Bernardino Mountains
directly to the northeast, because volcanic rocks do not occur there in drainages that have
12
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
shed sediment across the San Andreas Fault into Cenozoic basins west of the fault.
Volcanic rocks are abundant in the Chocolate Mountains region, however (Dillon, 1975;
Crowe, 1978; Crowe and others, 1979), and these almost surely are the source for
volcanic clasts in the fault slice and in the Painted Hill Formation where Allen (1957)
mapped it south of the Mission Creek study area. Thus, the main strand of the San
Andreas Fault must occur between all outcrops of the Painted Hill Formation—including
those in the fault slice—and Mojave Desert-type basement. This leaves unresolved (1)
the origin and significance of the broad zone of crushed and sheared crystalline rock and
(2) the purported depositional boundary between this zone and the volcanic-clast-bearing
unit.
Divergence of Mission Creek and Mill Creek strands
The Mission Creek and Mill Creek strands follow very different paths through San
Gorgonio Pass proper, but where they project eastward into the Coachella Valley the two
faults basically are coextensive (Fig. 2). This requires that somewhere between the two
regions the two faults diverge. Matti and others (1982, 1983, 1985, 1992) indicate that
this occurs at the southeast end of the Yucaipa Ridge block, where the Middle and South
Forks of the Whitewater River join. There, three faults come together (Fig. 6):
(1) From its position along the northeast side of the volcanic-clast-bearing
sedimentary unit, the Mission Creek strand trends progressively more westerly and
projects beneath the active alluvial wash of the Whitewater River. From there it extends
along the Whitewater South Fork, where it (a) continues to separate rocks of San Gabriel
Mountains-type (to the south) from rocks of Mojave Desert-type (to the north) and (b)
has an anomalous east-west orientation.
13
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
(2) The sinistral Pinto Mountain Fault approaches the Whitewater forks from the east,
projects beneath the Middle Fork wash, and obliquely intersects the Mission Creek Fault
(Allen, 1957, pl. 1).
(3) The Mill Creek Fault approaches the Pinto Mountain-Mission Creek intersection
from the west-northwest, but how it relates to this intersection is open to interpretation.
Allen (1957, pl. 1) shows three faults approaching the junction between the Middle and
South Whitewater Forks, and by implication these represent splays of his Mill Creek
Fault. However, on Allen’s map none of the three faults actually intersects the Pinto
Mountain or Mission Creek faults; more importantly, he does not indicate which of the
three is the main strand of the Mill Creek zone.
Matti and others (1982, 1983) refined Allen’s fault framework. They associated his
southwesternmost splay with the Mill Creek strand, and extended it completely across the
Yucaipa Ridge block where it appears to be truncated by the Pinto Mountain Fault (but
see an alternative rendering by Dibblee, 1964). This map solution resolves fault-
continuity questions raised by Allen’s mapping, but it has its own problems. As
interpreted by Matti and others (1982, 1983), the Mill Creek strand has a near-
perpendicular orientation to the Pinto Mountain and Mission Creek faults. This geometry
for the three faults is peculiar, considering that the Mill Creek strand ostensibly should
splay obliquely away from the abandoned Mission Creek crush zone as slip on the San
Andreas Fault jumped inboard to a new and younger fault to the northeast (Matti and
others, 1985, 1992; Matti and Morton, 1993).
To resolve this problem, Matti and others (1985, 1992, p. 13) proposed that the
junction between the two San Andreas strands has been modified by incursion of the
14
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
Pinto Mountain Fault from the east. This caused a sinistral deflection of the Mill Creek
trace. We refine this proposal by suggesting that the Mill Creek Fault crush zone where
it crosses the Yucaipa Ridge block has not merely been deflected by the Pinto Mountain
Fault but has been truncated and displaced from a cross-fault counterpart concealed
beneath young alluvial wash of the Whitewater River Middle Fork (Fig. 6). This solution
explains why the Mill Creek strand just to the west on the Yucaipa Ridge block does not
actually meet the Mission Creek strand, and why the two faults are nearly perpendicular.
Mission Creek and Mill Creek strands in the Raywood Flat region
Further to the west, in the Raywood Flat area, the Mission Creek and Mill Creek
strands follow markedly different pathways (Fig. 7). The Mission Creek strand continues
to be associated with a broad zone of crushed and sheared crystalline rocks that clearly
separates San Gabriel Mountains-type crystalline rocks to the south from Mojave Desert-
type crystalline rocks of the Yucaipa Ridge block to the north (Fig. 2).
Mission Creek Fault strand
The Mission Creek Fault strand appears to have been long abandoned by the San
Andreas Fault. Its crush zone is buried by surficial deposits of all ages that extend from
upper Raywood Flat to lower Raywood Flat and from there eastward down the South
Fork Whitewater River (Fig.7). Along this entire extent the deposits occur in terraces
that stand well above modern canyon bottoms.
Two discrete faults associated with the Mission Creek crush zone probably are not
related to the Quaternary San Andreas Fault:
(1) Within the north part of the crush zone Matti and others (1983, 1985) mapped a
discrete fault trace that they interpret as a San Andreas strand older than the Mission
15
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
Creek Fault. They correlated this older strand with the Wilson Creek Fault that occurs at
the northwest end of the Yucaipa Ridge block (Fig.4). The Wilson Creek Fault probably
is the oldest strand of the San Andreas Fault in the San Gorgonio Pass region (Fig. 3),
and therefore is not germane to Quaternary strain budgets within the San Andreas Fault
zone.
(2) Lower Raywood Flat is traversed by a degraded, north-facing fault scarp that
diagonals westward from the South Fork of Whitewater River to the San Gorgonio River
drainage basin. The scarp is developed in alluvial deposits correlative with those of
upper Raywood Flat, but tributary to those throughgoing axial deposits. Along the west
wall of the South Fork the fault juxtaposes the alluvial deposits against crushed and
sheared crystalline rock. Given its association with the Mission Creek crush zone, it is
tempting to relate the fault scarp to displacements on that fault. However, because the
scarp diagonals across the crush zone rather than paralleling it, and because the scarp
appears to trend toward Yucaipa Ridge rather than west and southwest along with the
Mission Creek crush zone, Matti and others (1983, 1985) attributed the landform to
younger tectonism that led to north-facing fault scarps throughout the San Gorgonio Pass
region (e.g., the north-facing scarp associated with the Mill Creek Fault at the Whitewater
Jumpoff; see Fig. 8). We accept this interpretation, and propose that the scarp reflects
tectonism related to the Pinto Mountain Fault, whose post-Mill Creek sinistral slip
probably fed westward along the crush zone of the Mission Creek strand. This sinistral
slip along the SW-NE trending Pinto Mountain fault would resolve as north-facing fault
scarps along the approximately E-W oriented Mission Creek strand.
Mill Creek Fault
16
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
From its divergence with the Mission Creek strand southeast of Raywood Flat
(Fig.7), the Mill Creek strand trends west-northwest up the Middle Fork of Whitewater
River, where its trace mainly is concealed beneath young alluvial-wash deposits. At the
head of the Middle Fork the fault is spectacularly exposed in precipitous terrain of the
Whitewater Jumpoff (Fig. 8). There, a discrete fault trace we assign to the Mill Creek
strand dips steeply to the north and occurs within a wide zone of crushed and brecciated
crystalline rock. The fault juxtaposes dark-colored gneissose and granitoid rocks of the
Yucaipa Ridge block against light-colored pinkish granitoid rocks of the San Gorgonio
Mountain block. Displacement has produced a north-facing scarp that can be mapped for
a short distance west-northwest across the eastern lobe of the “Y-shaped” Raywood Flat
alluvial succession (Fig.7). The scarp landform does not persist, however, because either
(1) scarp-forming ground ruptures did not extend throughout the Raywood Flat area or
(2) the scarp landform has been obscured by younger degradational and aggradational
events. Except for this scarp, no other tectonogeomorphic features are associated with
the Mill Creek strand in the Raywood Flat area. We take this to mean that this strand of
the San Andreas Fault has not generated significant dextral slip in late Quaternary time
(Matti and others, 1985, 1992).
MISSION CREEK STUDY AREA
Crystalline basement rocks
Crystalline rocks in the Mission Creek study area have been recognized as being
similar to those in the San Gabriel Mountains (Ehlig, 1977; Farley, 1979; Matti and
others, 1982, 1983). Figure 9 is a geologic map of the Mission Creek study area, based on
17
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
Matti and others (1982) and on subsequent USGS geologic mapping (J.C. Matti, B.F.
Cox, and R.E. Powell, unpublished data, 1980-1986, 2009). These investigations
confirmed the basic geologic framework reported by Allen (1957), but elaborate and
refine his findings.
Cenozoic cover rocks
In the Mission Creek area, crystalline rocks of San Gabriel Mountains-type are
overlain nonconformably by Miocene nonmarine sedimentary rocks (Coachella
Fanglomerate of Vaughan, 1922; Fig. 9). These sedimentary rocks were investigated by
Peterson (1975), who reports that crystalline-rock clasts, contained within the unit, are
similar to bedrock in the southern Chocolate Mountains. This observation is consistent
with Dillon’s (1975) correlation of crystalline-basement lithologies between the
Chocolate Mountains and San Gorgonio Pass. Just south of the Mission Creek study area
the Coachella Fanglomerate is overlain unconformably by the uppermost Miocene marine
Imperial Formation (McDougall and others, 1999) and the nonmarine Painted Hill
Formation. Allen (1957) did not recognize these units in the Mission Creek study area;
however, in the northwest part of the area (Fig. 6) a restricted body of sedimentary rock
probably correlates with the Painted Hill, based on abundant volcanic clasts that typify
the formation elsewhere. Allen tentatively assigned these strata to his Deformed Gravels
of Whitewater River ([unit Qdgw]; see next section). This local occurrence is important
to our investigation because—if the strata represent the Painted Hill Formation—they
constrain the position of the main San Andreas strand.
Allen’s “Deformed gravels of Whitewater River” (unit Qdgw; Figs. 4, 9) is a unit of
moderately to steeply dipping sandy and conglomeratic rock that parallels the Mission
18
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
Creek Fault in a narrow belt. It is poorly dated, but occupies a stratigraphic position
between (a) the underlying Miocene Coachella Fanglomerate and Pliocene Painted Hill
Formation and (b) overlying Quaternary alluvial deposits that unconformably lap over
tilted layers of the unit. Allen (1957) used these relations to assign a Quaternary age to
the deformed gravels unit. We concur: based on the likely upper age of the Painted Hill
Formation (late Pliocene or early Quaternary) and the lower age of oldest alluvial
deposits (~500-750 Ka), the Deformed gravels of Whitewater River probably are early to
middle Quaternary in age (~1.5 Ma to 750 Ka).
Clasts in the Deformed gravels of Whitewater River have ambiguous implications for
displacement on the San Andreas Fault because they include crystalline rocks of both San
Gabriel Mountains-type and Mojave Desert-type. The former are dominated by foliated,
mylonitic, and cataclastic granitoid rocks typical of the Vincent Thrust upper plate in the
San Gorgonio Pass region. They also include locally abundant Pelona Schist (albite-
actinolite-chlorite greenschist) of the Vincent Thrust lower plate. Today, Pelona Schist
crops out only in the westernmost part of San Gorgonio Pass (Fig. 4). Clasts of San
Gabriel Mountains-type are intermingled with clasts of Mojave Desert-type basement
rock, including texturally massive to foliated granitoids (monzogranite, granodiorite) and
various foliated and migmatitic granitoid and gneissose rock—all typical of drainages in
the eastern San Bernardino Mountains (Fig. 4; Dibblee, 1964, 1967; Matti and others,
1988). Absent from the unit are clasts of directly underlying basement rock (mainly
saussuritized quartz monzonite of Allen, 1957) and clasts demonstrably re-cycled out of
the underlying Miocene Coachella Fanglomerate.
19
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
Quaternary surficial materials
In the Mission Creek study area Quaternary surficial materials occur in two different
modes: (1) younger materials (Holocene and late Pleistocene) that have accumulated
within the modern landscape, and (2) older materials (middle Pleistocene) that
accumulated on older landscapes that presumably have been re-arranged by
displacements on the San Andreas Fault. In the vicinity of Mission Creek proper both
modes form a nested series of alluvial deposits that are a focus of our investigations.
Alluvial Stratigraphy and Geomorphology of the nested alluvial complex
General statement
Where Mission Creek exits its bedrock canyon and crosses the San Andreas Fault, its
incised course bisects a landscape of surficial units that form a nested series of alluvial-
fan and alluvial-wash deposits (Fig. 9). The youngest of these is the active wash of
Mission Creek that has its headwaters in the San Bernardino Mountains and incises the
nested alluvial complex before flowing into Coachella Valley. The highest-standing
alluvial units are oldest, are the most dissected, and have progressively better developed
soil profiles; successively lower units are younger and buttress unconformably against the
older units, thus leading to the nested character of the alluvial succession (Fig. 9). This
sequence represents pulses of erosional downcutting followed by aggradational
backfilling. Each unit is a singular morphostratigraphic entity separable from others in
the succession, and each represents a significant volume of alluvial sediment presumably
sourced from one or more large drainage basins. Units older than Holocene all dip
beneath young alluvial fill of the Coachella Valley.
20
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
Geologic ages for units in the Mission Creek nested alluvial complex are difficult to
determine. The units generally are too old for radiocarbon analysis, and frequently too
coarse grained for reliable luminescence dating. The oldest surfaces in this complex are
too old to be dated using luminescence or cosmogenic radionuclide (CRN) surface dating
techniques. All but the oldest deposits probably are younger than the Bruhnes-Matayama
reversal (780 ka), and in any event the materials are so coarse grained and sequences so
thin that magnetostratigraphic analysis is not promising.
Clemmens (2002) conducted a 10Be CRN investigation of boulders from the upper
surfaces of most of the alluvial units we recognize. In our view, the 10Be data reported by
Clemmens do not provide a consistent basis for assigning numerical ages to the
geomorphic surfaces or their underlying depositional fills (Clemmens, 2002; Clemmens
et al., 2003). Not only do ages for individual surfaces show considerable range, but mean
ages for the surfaces in some cases are out of sequence relative to their stratigraphic
position in the overall alluvial complex. Finally, the 10Be ages in general appear to be too
young relative to surface-age estimates based on pedogenic analysis (see below). To
evaluate Clemmens’ 10Be data, we conducted an analysis of 21Ne from surface boulders
(Kendrick et al., 2006; 2010). Although these ages seem to accord better with estimates
based on soils, the 21Ne data still do not provide a consistent basis for assigning numerical
ages to the geomorphic surfaces or their underlying depositional fills. To us, this means
that application of 10Be and 21Ne analyses to surface boulders is not helpful—at least to
the succession of geomorphic surfaces in the Mission Creek study area.
21
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
Very old alluvial-fan deposits, unit 2
Qvof2 is the highest-standing deposit of the Mission Creek alluvial complex. This
unit represents a major fill event, with a thickness of at least 25 meters, although
thickness likely varies. This unit unconformably overlies various older units, including
(1) Deformed Gravels of Whitewater River, (2) Miocene Coachella Fanglomerate, and
(3) crystalline bedrock of San Gabriel Mountains- and Chocolate Mountains-type. This
unit is represented west of the modern Mission Creek by three remnants, which are
preserved at the edge of a broad surface underlain by Qvof3 (Fig. 10; see below).
Surfaces associated with these remnants are collectively referred to as A1. These
surfaces appear to have been truncated by a pair of unnamed faults. The gaps that formed
along these fault lines were eroded and broadened prior to the deposition of Qvof3. To
the east of the incised active channel, this unit is more continuous, and is associated with
a preserved surface, designated A2. Very well-developed soils are associated with surface
A2. These soils have strong red colors (2.5YR4/6), thick, abundant clay films, prismatic
structure and a 2 meter-thick silica cemented duripan (Appendix A; Table A1).
Using the degree of soil development to estimate an age of this surface is somewhat
problematic. The criteria we use throughout this study to determine approximate ages,
based on soils, include a profile development index, a rubification index, and the
weighted mean value of clay content, as compared to regional dated soil chronosequences
(Table 1). The profile development index is not designed to be used in a well-cemented
duripan, such as we have on this surface. The duripan imparts a buff or yellow color that
can mask the rubification that developed prior to cementation, so the rubification index is
not useful. Sampling the duripan to extract the clay would be problematic. So our
22
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
estimates of age are only based on the pedogenic properties for the horizons above the
duripan, resulting in a significant underestimation, since the maximum development is
masked by the silica cementation. Using this limited part of the pedon, the profile
development values and the rubification indices both indicate that Surface A2 is greater
than 500 ka, as compared to the Cajon Pass chronosequence (McFadden and Weldon,
1987), and between 305 and 570 ka, as compared to the Merced chronosequence
(Harden, 1982, 1987; Table 1, Appendix A). However, the degree of development of the
duripan is much greater than that of regional duripans of roughly 500 ka. Such duripans
are preserved in surfaces within the San Timoteo Badland chronosequence (Kendrick and
Graham, 2002), just 50 km to the SW. Here the duripan is typified by widely-spaced
(averaging 50 cm), silica-rich seams, defining the tops of, and draping down the sides of,
large prismatic peds (pedogenic structural units). In contrast, the duripan associated with
surface A2 is nearly continuous, with much of the soil matrix engulfed in secondary silica
minerals.
Very old alluvial-fan deposits, unit 3
This unit is represented by large depositional bodies, separated by the incised Mission
Creek drainage (Fig. 10). On the upstream, western portion, these bodies are elongate,
oriented nearly east-west, and parallel to the Mission Creek strand. In this region,
deposition was confined in a corridor between escarpments along the Mission Creek fault
strand on the north, and the high-standing Miocene Coachella Fanglomerate on the south.
Adjacent to the Mission Creek fault strand escarpment are the Deformed Gravels of
Whitewater River, which comprise the high topography further towards the east in this
ancestral valley. On the downstream side of the active Mission Creek, Qvof3 deposits
23
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
are preserved in a fan arrangement, where the deposition extended beyond, and was no
longer constrained by, the ridge of Coachella Fanglomerate bedrock. Like Qvof2, this
unit unconformably overlies the three older units, as well as a strath eroded into Qvof2,
and is more than 40 m thick, where exposed. The remnants of a once-continuous
geomorphic surface are associated with each of these depositional bodies, and are
designated B1 through B4. These surfaces are deeply incised and exhibit ridge and
ravine morphology, which is particularly pronounced on B1 and B2. The incision of
these surfaces is oriented east-west, and extends beyond the upstream edge of each
surface remnant, indicating that incision initiated when the surface was more extensive,
and before isolation of these surfaces. Incision into surfaces B1 and B2 is greater than
that of B3 and B4. This is likely a result of a stronger component of continued
downcutting into the upstream surfaces, as those surface drainages have experienced
greater headward erosion through capture by the active Mission Creek. Surface B2 is
vertically offset, which we interpret to be a result of displacement on the previously
mentioned unnamed pair of faults. The slope of surface B1 is aligned with that of the
uppermost part of surface B2 (Fig. 11), suggesting that the westernmost fault extends
across a large, unnamed tributary (in this study designated as Drainage 3) of the Mission
Creek and intersects B1 at its distal edge.
Soil development is characterized at two locations on this unit (Table 1). Pedon
MC01 is located on B2, and is characterized by strong 5YR colors and thick clay films in
a 48 cm thick Bt horizon (Table A1, Appendix A). Because of the location of this pedon
on a narrow remnant, we interpret that this soil has been eroded. Soil development was
described by McFadden (1982) at the edge of B3 as having 2.5YR colors, abundant thick
24
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
clay films, and a sandy clay texture (Appendix A, Table A1). McFadden (1982)
classified this soil as S2, indicating that it was between 250 and 700 ka. We also
determine the age of this surface based on correlation of soil properties. For this surface,
the results of comparison to Merced and Cajon Pass chronosequences (Harden, 1987;
McFadden and Weldon, 1987) yields quite different results, depending on the criteria
used. In using the weighted mean value of clay content, this soil appears to be older than
500 ka, as compared to Cajon Pass, and older than 615 ka, when compared to Merced
(Table 1; Appendix A). However, using the profile development and rubification indices
generally suggests that this soil is greater than 305 ka and less than 570 ka, as compared
to Merced. In the case of the pedon developed on B3 (LDM 43), the rubification index
suggests an age of greater than 570 ka, though, as compared to Merced. These same
values, when compared to Cajon Pass, though, are intermediate to the values of the 55 ka
soil and the 500 ka soil in Cajon Pass. Again, the exception is the rubification index of
the LDM 43 pedon; this soil would then be estimated to be greater than 500 ka. Since we
recognize that the soil described on B2 is eroded, we weight the results of comparison
with Pedon LDM43, on B3, to infer that this soil is greater than 500 ka.
Old Alluvial Fan Deposits, unit 2
This unit (Qof2) was deposited as an alluvial fan deposit on a strath surface eroded
into Qvof3, and is at least 23 meters thick. The apex of the Qof2 fan points up the axial
wash of Mission Creek, and appears to be the depositional product of Mission Creek as it
incised into the older alluvial units, Qvof2 and Qvof3; it is inset and downstream of these
older units. Surfaces associated with this depositional unit are C1 through C3. These
25
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
surfaces flank unnamed drainages 1 and 2b. The drainage pattern on these surfaces is
radial. The gullies head on the surface, rather than extending beyond the upstream edge.
There is a belt of no erosion on the upstream edge, where we interpret that flow is
dominated by sheetwash. This pattern suggests that these drainages resulted from
concentration of runoff that originates on each surface.
Pedogenesis associated with these surfaces displays moderate thick clay films and 7.5
to 5 YR hues in a 150 cm thick Bt horizon (Appendix A). Two pedons have been
described; LDM 38A by McFadden (1982), and MC03 in this investigation. Clay
accumulation reaches a maximum value of 19.81% at a depth of 11 to 44 cm in pedon
MC03.
The age of Qof2 is determined by two IRSL dates, sampled from depths of 4 and 5
meters below the surface yielded results of 95 ± 15 and 106 ± 15 ka, respectively (Table
2; Appendix B). Because the dose rates for these sediments showed very high
concentrations of Th and K, it would be expected that the luminescence centers would
become rapidly filled, and thus these age determinations are considered to be a minimum.
These IRSL ages agree well with age estimates based on the degree of soil development.
McFadden (1982) determined that this soil was an S3 in his classification, indicating a
broad age of between 70 – 250 ka. Correlation of pedogenic properties to those of the
Cajon Pass chronosequence (McFadden and Weldon, 1987) indicates that this soil is
intermediate to a soil dated at 55±12 ka and one determined to be 500±200 ka. The
methods of correlation include profile development indices, rubification indices, and the
weighted mean value of clay content.
26
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
Old Alluvial Fan Deposit, unit 3
This unit (Qof3) occupies a fan-shaped area on the north side of the Mission Creek
axial wash, where it was deposited on a strath surface eroded into Qof2. The surface
associated with this deposit, D, is incised by a dense network of shallow drainages.
Similar to the drainage network associated with surfaces C1 and C2, this pattern suggests
post depositional erosion by flow originating on the surface. Pedon LDM 39A shows 7.5
YR colors, less frequent, thin to moderately thick clay films in a 59 cm thick Bt horizon
(McFadden, 1982). McFadden classified this soil as a S4, indicating that it is between 13
and 70 ka. Comparison of the profile development index of this soil to values from the
Cajon Pass chronosequence suggests that the soil is less than 67 ka; a similar comparison
to the profile development values of the Merced chronosequence suggests that the soil is
less than 103 ka. Using the rubification index as a basis for comparison, this soil would
be less than 43 ka, as compared to Cajon Pass, and greater than 103 ka, when compared
to the Merced chronosequence.
Long Profiles
The slopes of surface remnants A and B are parallel, with A just slightly above B
(Fig. 11). This suggests that there was not uplift or tilting in the interval between the
deposition of these two alluvial units, although a significant interval of time is
represented in the depth of erosion of surface A. Between the deposition of B and C,
regional tilting occurred, elevating the A and B surfaces up to the NW. This uplift
continued during the interval between the deposition of C and D. The surface remnant of
D is parallel to the local active stream, indicating that no observable tilt has occurred
27
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
since the time of abandonment of surface D, although D is elevated above the current
drainage (Fig. 11).
Lithologic character
Stratigraphic units in the nested alluvial complex are generally similar lithologically.
Each unit consists mainly of coarse-grained sediment having gravel:sand particle-size
ratios ranging from 1:1 to 4:1. No single lithologic attribute distinguishes one unit from
another. However, within the complex itself the succession of units is obvious (Fig. 9),
and their mapping and correlation throughout the immediate Mission Creek area is fairly
straightforward (Fig. 4). Representative lithologic types include (1) cobble-pebble
gravel, (2) sandy cobble-pebble gravel, (3) gravelly sand, (4) cobble-boulder gravel, and
(5) slightly gravelly sand (rare).
Bedding characteristics.—Most outcrops afford only two-dimensional views of
stratification that suggest parallel bedding ranging in thickness from medium to
very thick; rare three-dimensional views indicate stratification lenticular over
distances of a few tens of meters to many hundreds of meters. Layer bases are
sharp, and commonly are channelate.
Depositional fabrics.—Depositional fabrics in gravelly layers range from clast-
supported to matrix-supported. Clast-supported gravelly layers commonly have
imbricated cobbles and pebbles; sandy interlayers are parallel laminated to cross
laminated. These materials are fluvial in origin. Matrix-supported fabrics are
texturally massive and consist of cobble- and boulder-size clasts surrounded by
sandy and pebbly matrix; these materials formed by sediment-gravity flow
processes, mainly as subaerial debris flows.
28
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
Particle size, sorting and rounding.—Particle textures are quite variable. Particle
size ranges from boulders as large as 3 m to sand-size; pebble- and cobble-size
clasts are dominant, with boulders less common and sand-size particles occurring
either as matrix in clast-supported layers, as components of sandy gravel layers, or
as sand-rich layers between gravelly layers. Sorting typically is poor, given the
extreme range of particle sizes in most layers. Particle rounding is variable, with all
rounding classes represented; angular to subangular particles are common, but
subrounded to rounded particles occur.
Clast composition and weathering
The lithologic composition of pebbles, cobbles, and boulders in the nested alluvial
complex does not vary much from unit to unit. We base this conclusion not on statistical
analysis of clast counts from multiple observation stations but on numerous qualitative,
and limited quantitative observations obtained during the course of geologic mapping
(Matti and others, 1982; J.C. Matti, B.F. Cox, and R.E. Powell, unpublished data, 1980-
1986, 2009). Table 3 lists clast suites that we distil from these observations; Table 4 lists
clast-lithology frequencies from observations in units Qof2 and Qvof2.
Upper Raywood Flat Study Area
Upper Raywood Flat is an intermontane lowland situated in the north part of San
Gorgonio Pass (Fig. 7). The lowland occurs between the Mill Creek and Mission Creek
faults, and forms a conspicuous gap in the high-standing Yucaipa Ridge. This gap was
partly filled with Quaternary surficial deposits that have potential for (1) constraining the
29
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
slip history of the Mill Creek and Mission Creek faults and (2) deciphering the uplift
history of the Yucaipa Ridge block.
Crystalline basement rocks
Allen (1957) originally grouped crystalline rocks underlying the Raywood Flat area
within his “San Gorgonio igneous and metamorphic complex”—a terrane of plutonic and
metamorphic rocks underlying the entire San Gorgonio Pass region. Later workers
(Ehlig, 1977; Farley, 1979; Matti and others, 1983) demonstrated that crystalline rocks
beneath Upper Raywood Flat are more akin to Mojave Desert-type rocks north of the
Mill Creek Fault than to San Gabriel Mountains-type rocks south of the Mission Creek
Fault (Fig. 2). Thus, from a terrain-bounding perspective, the Mill Creek Fault is a minor
strand of the San Andreas Fault zone by comparison with the Mission Creek major
strand.
Beneath Upper Raywood Flat, no single lithology within the Mojave Desert-type
crystalline assemblage is distinctive. The rocks variably are textually massive to foliated
to migmatitic, and mainly are granodiorite and monzogranite with local gabbro-diorite
enclaves. Xenoliths and mappable screens of pre-batholithic metamorphic rock occur
locally (Farley, 1979; Matti and others, 1983). South of the Mission Creek Fault, San
Gabriel Mountains-type rocks are distinguished by (1) pervasive textural and
compositional foliation, (2) locally intense ductile and brittle-ductile deformation fabrics
(mylonite, cataclasite), (3) hornblende as a common mafic constituent, (4) pervasive
epidote mineralization, (5) common pegmatite and aplite dikes, and (6) distinctive rock
types such as Pelona Schist and Lowe intrusive complex (for regional summaries, see
Ehlig, 1982, and Joseph and others, 1982).
30
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
Quaternary surficial materials
Surficial materials of the Upper Raywood Flat lowland accumulated in a gap in the
Yucaipa Ridge block (Fig. 7). In plan view the deposits form a “Y”-shaped pattern:
adjacent to the San Gorgonio Mountain block, two alluvial lobes separated by a spur of
crystalline rock converge southward into a single lobe that abuts against a ridge of San
Gabriel Mountains-type rocks before turning east down the South Fork of Whitewater
River. Here, the Upper Raywood Flat alluvial sequence depositionally overlaps the broad
crush zone of the Mission Creek Fault. By contrast, the two northern alluvial lobes are
faulted against the Gorgonio Mountain block by the Mill Creek Fault.
In the Upper Raywood Flat lowland, surficial deposits represent three stratigraphic
packages:
Axial deposits.—Much of the sediment was deposited by streamflows that followed
longitudinal axes of the Y-shaped drainage pattern (Figs. 4, 7). These dominantly are
gravelly deposits but include finer-grained materials. Clasts consist mainly of granitoid
rocks that are texturally massive to foliated; these range from granodiorite to
monzogranite, and include leucocratic muscovite-garnet monzogranite like that mapped
by Morton and others (1980) on the San Gorgonio Mountain block. Clasts of migmatitic
or gneissic rock are subordinate, and mafic granitoids are rare. Clasts typically range
from small boulders to small cobbles (Fig.12); in sandy layers, clasts range from small
cobbles to pebbles. Clasts typically are subrounded, but range from rounded to
subangular. Depositional fabrics include both clast-support and matrix-support,
indicating fluvial and sediment-gravity-flow processes, respectively. We have not
documented which depositional type is dominant, but in outcrops we examined, fluvial
31
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
fabrics are common. The axial deposits are poorly dated, but they appear to be at least a
few hundred thousand years old based on the high-standing, deeply dissected character of
the deposits, and the well-developed argillic B horizons locally preserved on fill surfaces.
Tributary deposits.—Deposits attributable to throughgoing axial streamflows locally
are joined by fan-shaped sediment bodies that head on the Yucaipa Ridge block.
Deposits of the latter interfinger with those of the axial drainage, although we infer this
mainly from geomorphic relations. Where we examined them, tributary deposits are
compositionally more heterogeneous than axial deposits, reflecting both (1) the
heterogeneous composition of local Yucaipa Ridge source rocks and (2) compositional
winnowing by axial streamflows that selectively eliminated unstable foliated and
gneissose granitoid lithologies, thereby enriching these deposits in more stable granitoid
lithologies. In tributary deposits clast types include granitoid, gneissose, and migmatitic
rocks that typify crystalline rocks of the Yucaipa Ridge block.
Colluvial deposits.—Throughout the Raywood Flat area, axial and tributary deposits
have complex stratigraphic and geomorphic relations with colluvial deposits associated
with adjacent hillslopes. The colluvial materials complicate and obscure depositional and
contact relations between the major fills and their basement substrates. For example,
where the two prongs of the “Y”-shaped Raywood Flat axial regime abut against the
south flank of the San Gorgonio Mountain block, several generations of colluvial
sediment that mantle the block’s steep slopes have draped southward atop alluvial
sediment of the Raywood Flat lowland. This overlap makes it appear as though the two
deposit types (hillslope colluvium and valley-filling alluvium) originally formed a
depositional continuum, with the two interfingering throughout their history. However,
32
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
the Mill Creek Fault separates the Raywood Flat deposits from the San Gorgonio
Mountain block, and colluvial deposits derived from that block overlap and obscure this
tectonic relationship. This example illustrates the camouflaging effect that young
colluvial deposits have on paleogeographic relations among Raywood Flat surficial
materials.
Geomorphic Setting - Upper Raywood Flat
To the north of the Mill Creek strand of the SAFZ there are several major drainages
that provide keys to decipher the sequence and timing of fault activity (Fig.5).
The North Fork Whitewater River drains the NE flank of San Gorgonio Mountain, the
highest peak in southern California, and flows into the Middle Fork Whitewater River at
the location of the Mission Creek strand of the SAF. It has a drainage area of 20.7 km2,
and basin relief of 2025 meters. This drainage system is being actively captured by
headward lengthening by the drainage currently occupying Raywood Flat, the South Fork
Whitewater River. The orientation of the upper portion of the North Fork Whitewater
drainage is influenced by the NW striking Lake Peak Fault. This fault has been active
during the Quaternary, as evidenced by displaced glacial deposits and pronounced
triangular facets along the NE side of the drainage.
Hell For Sure Canyon is parallel to, and to the east of, the North Fork Whitewater,
separated by a prominent ridgeline, Ten Thousand Foot Ridge. This drainage joins the
Middle Fork Whitewater River roughly 2 km to the east of the North Fork Whitewater
junction. It has a smaller area, 12.1 km2, and a range of elevation of 1770 m.
Just to the east of Hell For Sure drainage, the Mission Creek drainage heads on the
San Gorgonio block, at the western extent, and the Big Bear block to the east, and drains
33
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
an area of approximately 87 km2. It flows through the Mission Creek alluvial complex of
this study, into the Coachella Valley, and integrates with the San Gorgonio River,
flowing towards the Gulf of California.
Upper Raywood Flat preserves the former course of drainages, flowing across the
Yucaipa Ridge block terrain, prior to disruption by uplift of the Yucaipa Ridge block by
fault activity. These two drainages joined at the location of Upper Raywood Flat. The
relative elevation of Upper Raywood Flat within the larger uplifted Yucaipa Ridge
indicates that the drainage was able to effectively downcut for a period of time before
being captured and rearranged. The depth of incision of this antecedent drainage valley
below the ridgeline of Yucaipa Ridge is approximately 400 meters. It is reasonable to
expect that the sharp-crested Yucaipa Ridge has been lowered by erosion, and so this
value is likely a minimum. The drainages that carved this valley had significant stream
power to keep pace with a rising landscape.
North Fork Whitewater and the Hell For Sure drainages, which currently flow to the
Whitewater River, are positioned to have flowed through, and formed this wind gap.
They are located 7.3 to 8.5 km to the SE, respectively, in agreement with the lithologic
offset of 8-10 km identified by previous workers (Matti and others, 1985). We assign an
uncertainty of 0.2 km to these measurements. The width of each of these two drainages
matches well with the widths of those in Raywood Flat (Fig. 13). The spacing between
these two drainage systems is slightly more than the spacing of the two lobes in Raywood
Flat, which would be expected, as they represent the upstream extension of the ‘Y’
shaped stream juncture. Aggradation within Raywood Flat, from both the flanks of
Yucaipa Ridge and from the San Gorgonio Mountain block has filled in this valley. In
34
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
contrast, incision has continued in the Hell For Sure and North Fork Whitewater
drainages, as evidenced by the deep, ‘V’ shaped valley morphology, and lack of high
preserved terraces along these drainages.
This reconstruction indicates that there is approximately 930 25 meters elevation
difference between the western drainage in Raywood Flat and the North Fork Whitewater
River, and 1020 25 meters between the eastern drainage in Raywood Flat and the Hell
For Sure drainage. This suggests that Yucaipa Ridge has been uplifted by approximately
this amount during the time that lateral motion occurred on the Mill Creek strand.
Following the displacement of Upper Raywood Flat to its final position, headward
extension of the South Fork Whitewater River, which currently occupies this topographic
gap, has led to erosion in the flank of the San Gorgonio block. A reconstruction of
topography, by ‘filling in the canyons’ leads to a measurement of approximately 31.5 km
of material removed, over an area of 7 km2, since the final motion on the Mill Creek
strand. This approach to determine volume loss assumes a relatively smooth initial
condition, with no prior erosion to this escarpment. We would argue, however that the
measurement is valid in providing an estimate of denudation for two reasons. First, prior
to motion along the Mill Creek strand, the Yucaipa Ridge block was a part of the San
Gorgonio block, and formed a continuous landscape. Second, the uplift of the Yucaipa
Ridge block during the lateral offset of the Mill Creek strand, as discussed above, would
have resulted in higher topography to the south, and therefore the landscape to the north
would not likely experience significant incision. Binnie and others (2010) measured a
long-term denudation rate of 270 + 28 mm/yr at a nearby location on the San Gorgonio
block. Applying that rate of denudation to the headwaters of South Fork Whitewater
35
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
leads to an estimate of 106 – 130 ka to remove the volume of material eroded from the
San Gorgonio block.
DISCUSSION
Drainage reconstruction- Implications for lateral fault slip
Prior to inception of slip on the Mill Creek strand, North Fork Whitewater and Hell
For Sure Rivers flowed through Upper Raywood Flat, and then on to the South Fork
Whitewater River. Mission Creek was positioned on a path to the northwest of
Walthier’s Landing, depositing Qvof2 in our alluvial complex (Fig. 14a). There is more
than one path that could have been used by flow from Mission Creek drainage to reach
the depositional area. We illustrate one route in this depiction; flow south along the west
side of the prominent bedrock island currently preserved near the juncture of South Fork
and Middle Forks, Whitewater River, followed by a sharp deflection towards the east,
along the southern edge of the island. Following deposition of unit Qvof2, the associated
surface was displaced by the pair of unnamed faults, discussed previously. Erosion
followed in the zones of weakness introduced by this faulting, and small valleys
separated the surface remnants, designated A1 (Fig. 10).
Deposition of Qvof3 followed, also preceding movement on the Mill Creek strand
(Fig. 14b). As currently preserved, Qvof3 is a more extensive deposit than Qvof2,
although it is not known to what extent Qvof2 was eroded prior to, and during the
deposition of Qvof3. Both of these units were deposited in a linear valley that was
parallel to the Mission Creek strand. We envision that this valley would have a modern
analog in Lone Pine Canyon, along the San Andreas Fault in the Cajon Pass region.
36
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
Regional uplift and tilting of surfaces A and B followed, as evidenced in the long
profiles (Fig. 11). Extensive incision into these high surfaces occurred during this
interval. This resulted in the prominent east-west oriented ridge and ravine pattern on
these surfaces. The Mill Creek strand became active, and Mission Creek was moved into
a position where flow down an ancestral Whitewater Canyon was optimal (Fig. 14c).
The lower portion of Whitewater Canyon follows Whitewater fault, and was established
along this zone of weakness in the rock fabric. It should be noted, though, that at the
time that Mission Creek flowed in this canyon, it would not have been deeply incised, as
it is currently. High terraces are present throughout Whitewater Canyon, which may
have been deposited at this time. Dating of these is planned for future research.
After some lateral displacement along the Mill Creek Fault, Mission Creek was
blocked from easy access to Whitewater Canyon by the high ground just to the NW of
our Surface B1 (Fig. 10), and was positioned to incise into Qvof3 (Fig. 14d), by way of
stream reach 3 (Fig. 10).
It is difficult to determine the position of the upstream reach of Mission Creek when
the unit Qof2 was deposited. It is possible that it occurred at any of the positions
represented by figures 14d through 14f. We prefer the interpretation that this deposition
occurred at the position represented by figure 14f, when the Mill Creek strand had moved
the 8.5 km that represents the entire slip on this strand, though we recognize that this is
not a unique solution. This scenario is preferred because of the subsequent slip on the
Pinto Mountain Fault, as discussed below. Deposition of this unit following completion
of slip on the Mill Creek strand of the SAF (time represented by Fig. 14f) is consistent
with the amount of denudation experienced in the headwaters of the South Fork,
37
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
Whitewater River, as discussed above. Additionally, this unit, Qof2, is tilted with respect
to unit Qof3 (Fig. 11), suggesting that some significant interval of time separated the
emplacement of these two units. After deposition of unit Qof2, flow for a time was along
the stream segment 2b, incising and isolating the two surface remnants C1 and C2 (Fig.
14f). The final history of this alluvial complex, as considered in this study, was the
emplacement and incision of unit Qof3 (Fig. 14g, h).
When the Mission Creek drainage was laterally positioned to flow against the
northern edge of B1, we hypothesize that it diverted to the east, carving the escarpment
that follows the trend of the Mission Creek strand. The final position of the Mission
Creek drainage was accomplished by capture towards the modern drainage, and
abandonment of the drainage segment 2b.
The 7.3 – 8.5 km of offset documented for the Mill Creek strand leads to a
determination of slip rate of between ~18 and 22 mm/yr for the interval of 500 – 100 ky
BP. This rate of slip is higher than those determined to the north and south of the San
Gorgonio Pass region. At the Plunge Creek location to the north, on the San Bernardino
strand, McGill and others (2013) establish a slip rate of 8.3-14.5 mm/yr for the past 35
ka, and 6.8-16.3 mm/yr for the past 10.5 ka. To the south, at the Biskra fan site, Behr and
others (2010) find 14 – 17 mm/yr slip for the past 45 to 54 ka. The differences in these
rates, may be attributed to the differing time intervals over which slip was measured.
Previous studies have suggested that the slip rates along the San Andreas Fault system
vary through time, with slip transfer to the San Jacinto Fault (Bennett et al., 2004).
Additionally, the Mill Creek strand represents an orientation that is aligned with the plate
boundary, and would be favorable for the efficient transfer of slip along the San Andreas
38
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
Fault system. Three-dimensional modeling indicates an increased efficiency during this
time interval, and a modeled slip rate of 21 mm/yr, in agreement with our results (Cooke
and Dair, 2011).
Drainage Reconstruction – Implication for uplift of structural blocks
Spotila and others (1998, 2001) propose that the Yucaipa Ridge has been uplifted 3 –
4 km, based on very young apatite (U-Th)/He ages. Their thermochronologic models
suggest that the block experienced very rapid uplift, with rates as high as 7 mm/yr during
the interval 1.25 – 1.65 Ma. Following this rapid uplift, an additional 1 - 2 km uplift is
proposed during the interval 1.25 Ma to present, although the models do not constrain the
temporal distribution of this uplift within this interval of time. Their model further
suggests that uplift on the Yucaipa Ridge block exceeds that of the San Gorgonio block,
and that Yucaipa Ridge has been uplifted approximately 1 km higher than San Gorgonio
block.
The reconstruction of drainages in this study allows us to provide further evidence as
to the history of uplift of these two blocks. The deep incision of the drainage system of
Hell For Sure and North Fork Whitewater through Raywood Flat suggests that both the
Yucaipa Ridge and San Gorgonio blocks were being actively uplifted. This was likely in
response to oblique motion along the Mission Creek strand, as the strand became oriented
counter clockwise with respect to the plate motion vector. Following inception of the
Mill Creek strand, and lateral displacement and beheading of Upper Raywood Flat
drainage system, there has been approximately 975 70 m of uplift on the Yucaipa
Ridge block relative to the San Gorgonio block. We can use our best determination of
the age of surface B, greater than 500 ka, to infer that the differential uplift between the
39
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
Yucaipa Ridge and San Gorgonio blocks occurred relatively recently. Since the Mill
Creek strand forms the structural boundary between these blocks, it is not unexpected that
the uplift differential occurred during the time of activity of this fault system. The uplift
recorded by this drainage reconstruction, combined with the duration of activity of the
Mill Creek fault strand leads to an uplift rate of ~ 2.3 – 2.6 mm/yr.
Mission Creek and Mill Creek strands
Prior to disruption by the Pinto Mountain Fault, the Mill Creek strand ostensibly was
a throughgoing structure that splayed northeast away from the older Mission Creek
strand, which, by this time, had been long abandoned by the San Andreas Fault (~ 500 ka
according to Matti and others, 1985, 1992; Matti and Morton, 1993). Whether the Mill
Creek strand initiated (1) by reactivation of the old Mission Creek trace or (2) by
pioneering a closely associated fault within the latter’s crush zone, the two strands
southeast of the Whitewater River forks would have been closely spaced and would have
trended southeasterly. However, west of the Whitewater River, where the Mission Creek
Fault crush zone gradually adopts a more westerly orientation, the zone would not have
been compatible with San Andreas slip vectors and efficient slip on the coextensive (but
younger) Mill Creek strand would have been progressively more difficult. Accordingly,
Matti and others (1985, 1992) reasoned that—at the confluence of the Whitewater River
forks—the Mill Creek strand stepped inboard of the Mission Creek crush zone. This new
trace would have been aligned better with San Andreas slip vectors, as suggested by its
regional orientation subparallel to the Coachella Valley and Mojave Desert segments of
the San Andreas (Figs. 1, 2). Indeed, three-dimensional modeling confirms the increase
in dextral efficiency during the time of activity of the Mill Creek strand (Cooke and Dair,
40
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
2011). These regional considerations make sense, but they do not address what the
divergence zone between the Mill Creek and Mission Creek strands would have looked
like.
Our hypothesis that the Pinto Mountain Fault has truncated and sinistrally displaced
the Mill Creek Fault provides insight into this question. When 1 to 1.25 km of left-slip is
restored on the Pinto Mountain, the north-trending crush zone at the southeast end of the
Yucaipa Ridge block that we (and Matti and others, 1982, 1983) associate with the Mill
Creek Fault returns to a position close to the last observed occurrence of the strand
southeast of the Middle Fork of the Whitewater River. There, the Mill Creek and
Mission Creek faults either occupy the same trace or are closely spaced. Given this, and
given that their separate paths farther west in San Gorgonio Pass converge toward this
coextensive reach, then the point where the two faults originally would have diverged can
be constrained to a small area near where the Middle and South Whitewater Forks
currently join. Here, in order to acquire its west-northwest path along the Middle Fork of
the Whitewater River (Fig. 6), the Mill Creek strand would have had to splay abruptly
northward away from the Mission Creek strand. The original geometry of this
divergence is not obvious from current fault patterns. However, restoration of ~1 to 1.25
km of left-slip on the Pinto Mountain Fault returns the Mill Creek strand on the Yucaipa
Ridge block to a position where its north orientation makes sense. There, at the mouth of
the Middle Whitewater Fork, all that is needed to connect this trace of the fault with its
counterpart to the southeast is a short concealed segment that we infer between the two
bedrock traces. This inferred segment would have to be north-trending (1) in order to be
compatible with the north trend of the strand where it crosses Yucaipa Ridge, and (2) in
41
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
order to efficiently jump the Mill Creek strand inboard to its path up the Whitewater
Middle Fork. Absent such a segment, we don’t see how otherwise to connect (a) the
west-northwest-oriented Mill Creek strand that extends through San Gorgonio Pass and
then westward for nearly 50 km along the base of the San Bernardino Mountains with (b)
the northwest-oriented Mill Creek/Mission Creek fault that extends for more than 100 km
southeast of the Whitewater forks (Fig. 2).
Our reconstruction of the Mill Creek strand across the restored Pinto Mountain Fault
has three consequences:
(1) Sinistral displacement on the Pinto Mountain Fault disrupted right-slip on the
Mill Creek Fault, effectively ending its role as a throughgoing strand of the San Andreas
Fault. We explore timing for these events in the next section.
(2) Sinistral offset of the truncated Mill Creek Fault by 1 to 1.25 km would have
significantly rearranged landscapes, especially the deeply entrenched canyon of the
Middle Fork of Whitewater River. For much of its length, that landform has a west-
northwest orientation. However, where the Middle Fork joins the South Fork, the
entrenched Middle Fork curves abruptly southward. If this abruptly curving segment
were part of the landscape prior to sinistral slip on the Pinto Mountain Fault, then
palinspastic reconstruction of that fault necessarily would reposition this landform east of
its current location. This would place the upstream portion of the Middle Fork
Whitewater River to Hell for Sure Drainage with the unnamed drainage, a tributary to the
Mission Creek drainage, designated on figure 6. It would align the North Fork
Whitewater River with the wind gap and the downstream portion of the Middle Fork
Whitewater.
42
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
(3) In order for left-slip on the Pinto Mountain Fault to have truncated and offset
the Mill Creek Fault but not similarly affected the Mission Creek Fault, Pinto Mountain
slip must have fed into the Mission Creek crush zone that trends up the South Fork of
Whitewater River. Otherwise, the Mill Creek Fault could not have been displaced
(deflected sensu Matti and others, 1985, 1992) to its current position at the southeast end
of the Yucaipa Ridge block. This is consistent with the fact that the Pinto Mountain Fault
meets the Mission Creek crush zone at a low oblique angle, suggesting that (a) the two
faults physically merge and (b) allowing sinistral slip to feed into the Mission Creek
zone. This poses kinematic problems comparable to where other left-lateral strike slip
faults interact with the San Andreas (e.g., left-lateral faults of the Eastern Transverse
Ranges; Powell, 1993; Dickinson, 1997; Langenheim and Powell, 2009).
Pinto Mountain Fault
The Pinto Mountain Fault is a sinistral strike-slip fault that traverses the boundary
between the Mojave Desert and Transverse Ranges provinces. The fault is represented
by discontinuous scarps and bedrock traces that trend westward from the Twentynine
Palms area to Morongo Valley. The fault’s inception age is not agreed to, but Quaternary
displacements are well documented by deflected drainages, linear scarps, pressure ridges,
shutter ridges, closed depressions and springs (Bryant, 2000). Holocene fault movements
are documented by a palesoseismic investigation near Twentynine Palms (Cadena et al.,
2003, 2004). This location records five or six earthquakes that resulted in surface
rupture. The earliest event occurred between 11.1 – 14.1 ka, a possible later event
occurred at about 9.4 ka, and four events have occurred since 9.4 ka (Cadena et al.,
2004). Holocene displacements probably have occurred to the west, where discontinuous
43
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
scarps in Quaternary alluvium occur between the communities of Joshua Tree and Yucca
Valley, but the stratigraphy and age of the alluvial deposits has not been documented
other than by general age estimates based on the development of soil properties and the
degree of desert pavement formation (Bryant, 2000; see the general geologic setting
presented by Nishikawa and others, 2003, based on unpublished geologic mapping by
J.C. Matti).
Information about the Pinto Mountain Fault in the vicinity of the Mission Creek study
area is known mainly from reconnaissance geologic mapping by Dibblee (1964, 1968b)
and Matti and others (1988) and from groundwater investigations (Bader and Moyle,
1958). Here, in the Morongo Valley area, the fault is concealed by Holocene alluvial
deposits but forms prominent scarps in older Quaternary deposits that probably are late
Pleistocene in age (Matti and others, 1988). Traced westward to the Whitewater River
the fault forms conspicuous crush zones in crystalline rocks and locally forms scarps in
Quaternary deposits. Precariously balanced rocks of undetermined age are located just
north of the fault between Morongo and Yucca Valleys (Brune and others, 2010),
suggesting that movement during the latest Holocene has been minimal.
The Pinto Mountain Fault zone as a whole has a reported maximum displacement of
between 16 km (Dibblee, 1975) and up to 19 km (Batcheller, 1978), determined from
offset Mesozoic and older crystalline bedrock units. Alternate hypotheses for the spatial
distribution of offsets include: (1) maximum slip is constant along the entire length of
the fault (Hopson, 1996); (2) a slip maximum occurs in the central region, diminishing as
44
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
the fault becomes displaced vertically, north side up, to the west (Dibblee, 1968b); (3)
slip diminishes from west to east (Langenheim and Powell, 2009).
Prior slip-rate estimates range from 1 to 5.3 mm/yr, based on inferred ages of offset
units. Anderson (1979) used the total offset along the fault to estimate a slip rate of 1-2
mm/yr, based on an inferred inception of fault movement of 8 – 16 Ma. Langenheim and
Powell (2009) suggest that the inception of faulting on the sinistral faults of the Eastern
Transverse Ranges, of which the Pinto Mountain is the northernmost, occurred during the
late Miocene, likely younger than 6 Ma. This inception time would suggest long-term
slip-rates of 2.67 to 3.12 mm/yr.
Other workers used a 9.6 km offset measurement of a fanglomerate, estimated by
Dibblee (1975) to be Pleistocene. This leads to a long-term slip-rate estimate of 5.3
mm/yr, using the entire duration of the Pleistocene (Bird and Rosenstock, 1984). Other
studies interpreted the age of this offset landform to be Pleistocene to Miocene, resulting
in slip rate estimates of 0.3 to 5.3 mm/yr (Wesnousky, 1986; Peterson and Wesnousky,
1994). A Miocene age for this surface is inconsistent with a Miocene age of inception of
the fault system.
Our study suggests that, for a limited time in the recent geologic history, the slip rate
on the Pinto Mountain Fault was significantly higher than these previous determinations.
Between 1 and 1.25 km of slip along the Pinto Mountain Fault offset and disrupted the
Mill Creek strand following cessation of slip along that strand of the SAF. If the entire
slip along the Mill Creek strand was completed by the time of emplacement of deposits
associated with surface C1, with a preferred age estimate of ~ 100 ka, then slip rate on the
Pinto Mountain fault would be 10 - 12.5 mm/yr for this interval. If the emplacement of
45
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
surface C1 occurred prior to complete slip on the Mill Creek strand (e.g., emplaced at
time indicated by Fig. 14e rather than that of Fig. 14f), then the slip rate on the Pinto
Mountain would be higher. We would propose that the rate of slip on the Pinto Mountain
Fault has been temporally variable. The Pinto Mountain Fault seems to have not been
active during the time of activity along the Mill Creek strand; had it been, it would have
complicated the trace of this very linear fault strand. If the Pinto Mountain Fault was
inactive at this time, then the slip rate for the past ~500 ka would average 2.5 mm/yr
along this fault.
CONCLUSIONS
Geologic mapping, geomorphic analysis and geochronological determinations allow
for an increased understanding of the evolution of the San Andreas Fault system through
the San Gorgonio Pass. The Mill Creek strand, which is frequently used for modeling of
active slip through this region, is found to have been active during the interval of
approximately 500 to 100 kyBP.
Erosion of the headwater region associated with the Upper Raywood Flat indicates
that approximately 106 – 130 ka is required to remove the volume of missing material,
using a nearby independent rate of erosion. This confirms the IRSL ages of 106 to 95 ka
for the cessation of movement of the Mill Creek strand.
Displacement of the Mill Creek strand, following abandonment of the strand, by the
Pinto Mountain Fault suggests that the Pinto Mountain fault has had variable slip rate
46
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
over the past 500 ka, ranging from 2.0 – 2.5 mm/yr for the entire period of time, to ~10 –
12.5 mm/yr for the interval 100 ka to present.
The Yucaipa Ridge block has been uplifted 975 ± 70 m, relative to the San Gorgonio
block. This uplift occurred during the period of activity of the Mill Creek strand, and the
uplift rate is 2.3-2.6 mm/yr. The lateral slip rate on the Mill Creek strand during this
interval was 18-22 mm/yr.
47
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
REFERENCES CITED
Allen, C.R., 1957, San Andreas fault zone in San Gorgonio Pass, southern California: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 68, p. 319-350.
Anderson, J.G., 1979, Estimating the seismicity from geologic structure, for seismic risk studies: Bulletin of the Seismological society of America, vol. 69, p. 135-158.
Bader, J.S., and Moyle, W.R., Jr., 1958, Data on water wells and springs in Morongo Valley and vicinity, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, California: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report, 31 p.
Batcheller, J. III, 1978, Quaternary geology of the Mojave Desert-eastern Transverse Range boundary in the vicinity of Twentynine Palms, California: University of California, Los Angeles, unpublished M.S. thesis, 157 p.
Behr, W.M., Rood, D.H., Fletcher, K.E., Guzman, N., Finkel, R., Hanks, T.C., Hudnut, K.W., Kendrick, K.J., Platt, J.P., Sharp, W.D., Weldon, R.J., Yule, J.D., 2010, Uncertainties in slip-rate estimates for the Mission Creek strand of the southern San Andreas Fault at Biskra Palms Oasis, Southern California: GSA Bulletin v. 122, no. 9-10, p. 1360-1377.
Bennett, R.A., Friedrich, A.M., and Furlong, K.P., 2004, Codependent histories of the San Andreas and San Jacinto fault zones from the inversion of fault displacement rates: Geology, v. 32, p. 961-964.
Bevis, M., Hudnut, K., Sanchez, R. , Toth, C. , Grejner-Brzezinska, D., Kendrick, E. , Caccamise, D.; Raleigh, D., Zhou, H., Shan, S., Shindle, W., Yong, A., Harvey, J., Borsa, A., Ayoub, F., Shrestha, R., Carter, B., Sartori, M., Phillips, D., and Coloma, F., 2005, The B4 Project: Scanning the San Andreas and San Jacinto Fault Zones, EOS, Transaction of the American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2005, abstract #H34B-01.
Binnie, S.A., Phillips, W.M., Summerfield, M.A., Fifield, L.K., Spotila, J.A., 2010, Tectonic and climatic controls of denudation rates in active orogens: The San Bernardino Mountains, California: Geomorphology, V. 118, p. 249-261.
Binnie, S.A., Phillips,W.M., Summerfield, M.A., Fifield, L.K., and Spotila, J.A., 2008, Patterns of denudation through time in the San Bernardino Mountains, California: Implications for early-stage orogenesis: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 276, p. 62–72.
Bird, P., and Rosenstock, R.W., 1984, Kinematics of present crust and mantle flow in southern California: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 95, p. 946-957
Birkeland, P. W. (1999). Soils and geomorphology. New York, United States (USA): Oxford University Press, New York.
Blythe, A.E., House, M.A., Spotila, J.A., 2002, Low-temperature thermochronology of the San Gabriel and San Bernardino Mountains, Southern California; constraining structural evolution: Geological Society of America, Special Paper, v. 365, p. 231-250.
48
1046
10471048
10491050
105110521053
105410551056
10571058105910601061
106210631064
106510661067106810691070
107110721073
1074107510761077
10781079
10801081
1082108310841085
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
Brune, J., Purvance, M., Anooshehpoor, R., Anderson, J., Grant-Ludwig, L., Rood, D., Kendrick, K., 2010, Possible explanations for discrepancies between precariously balanced rocks and 2008 hazard maps: Seismological Research Letters, vol. 81, no. 2, p. 330.
Bryant, W. A., compiler, 2000, Fault number 118, Pinto Mountain fault zone (includes Morongo Valley fault), in Quaternary fault and fold database of the United States: U.S. Geological Survey website, http://earthqukes.usgs.gov/regional/qfaults.
Cadena, A., Rubin, C., Rockwell, T., Walls, C., Lindvall, S., Madden, C., Khatib, Owen, L., 2004, Late Quaternary Activity of the Pinto Mountain Fault at the Oasis of Mara: Implications for the Eastern California Shear Zone: Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 36, No. 5, p. 137.
Cadena, A., Rubin, C., Walls, C., Khatib, F., Rockwell, T., Lindvall, S., Madden, C., 2003, Paleoseismic investigation on the Pinto Mountain Fault at the Oasis of Mara, Mojave Desert, California: Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union, vol. 84, no. 46, Abst. S12B-0392.
Clemmens, S., 2002, Testing the application of cosmogenic radionuclide dating to studies in landscape evolution, paleoenvironmental change and neotectonics in the Coachella Valley, south-central-California: Royal Holloway, England, University of London, unpublished MS thesis, 65 p.
Clemmens, S., Owen, L., Finkel, R., Matti, J., Landis, G., Goodall, K., and Singhvi, A., 2003, Alluvial fans, a much neglected dryland environmental proxy: evidence for landscape evolution, paleoenvironmental change and neotectonics along a transform plate boundary, south-central California: XVI INQUA Congress, Programs with Abstracts, p. 225.
Cooke, M.L., and Dair, L.C., 2011, Simulating the recent evolution of the southern big bend of the San Andreas fault, Southern California, J. Geophys. Res., 116, B04405, doi:10.1029/2010JB007835
Crowe, B.M., 1978, Cenozoic volcanic geology and age of inception of Basin-Range faulting in the southeasternmost Chocolate Mountains, California: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 89, p. 251, 264.
Crowe, B.M., Crowell, J.C., and Krummenacher, D., 1979, Regional stratigraphy, K-Ar ages, and tectonic implications of Cenozoic volcanic rocks, southeastern California: American Journal of Science, v. 279, p. 186-216.
Dickinson, W.R., 1997, Kinematics of transrotational tectonism in the California Transverse Ranges and its contribution to cumulative slip along the San Andreas transform fault system: Geological Society of America Special Paper 305, 46 p.
Dibblee, T.W., Jr., 1964, Geologic map of the San Gorgonio Mountain quadrangle, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, California: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Geologic Investigations Map I-431, scale 1:62,500.
Dibblee, T.W., Jr., 1967, Geologic map of the Morongo Valley quadrangle, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, California: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Geologic Investigations Map I-517, scale 1:62,500.
49
1086108710881089
109010911092
1093109410951096
1097109810991100
1101110211031104
11051106110711081109
111011111112
111311141115
111611171118
111911201121
112211231124
112511261127
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
Dibblee, T.W., Jr., 1968a, Displacements on San Andreas fault system in San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto Mountains, southern California, in Dickinson, W.R., and Grantz, Arthur, eds., Proceedings of conference on geologic problems of San Andreas fault system: Stanford University Publications in Geological Sciences, v. XI, p. 269-278.
Dibblee, T.W., Jr., 1968b, Evidence of major lateral displacement on the Pinto Mountain fault, southern California: Geological Society of America Special Paper 115, p. 322.
Dibblee, T.W., Jr., 1975, Late Quaternary uplift of the San Bernardino Mountains on the San Andreas and related faults, in Crowell, J.C., ed., San Andreas fault in southern California: California Division of Mines and Geology Special Report 118, p. 127-135.
Dibblee, T.W., Jr., 1982, Geologic map of the Banning (15 Minute) Quadrangle, California: Santa Ana, South Coast Geological Society Geologic Map SCGS 2, scale 1:62,500.
Dibblee, T.W., Jr., 1982, Geology of the San Bernardino Mountains, southern California, in Fife, D.L., and Minch, J.A., eds., Geology and mineral wealth of the California Transverse Ranges: South Coast Geological Society Guidebook no. 10 (Mason Hill volume), p. 148-169.
Dillon, J.T., 1975, Geology of the Chocolate and Cargo Muchacho Mountains, southeasternmost California: Santa Barbara, University of California, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, 405 p.
Ehlig, P.L., 1977, Structure of the San Andreas fault zone in San Gorgonio Pass, southern California: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 9., no. 4, p. 416.
Farley, Thomas, 1979, Geology of a part of northern San Gorgonio Pass, California: Los Angeles, California State University, unpublished M.S. thesis, 159 p.
Forman, S.L., and Pierson, J., 2002: Late Pleistocene luminescence chronology of loess deposition in the Missouri and Mississippi river valleys, United States: Paleogeography, Paleoclimatology, Paleoecology, v. 186, no. 1 and 2, p. 25-46.
Harden, J.W., 1982, A quantitative index of soil development from field descriptions: Examples from a chronosequence in central California; Geoderma, v. 28, p.1-28.
Harden, J.W., 1987, Soils developed in granitic alluvium near Merced, California: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin A1-A65.
Hopson, R.F., 1996, The Pinto Mountain Fault, Mojave Desert, Southern California; offset documentation and tectonics:Abstracts with Programs- Geological Society of America, v. 28, no. 5, p. 76.
50
11281129113011311132
113311341135
1136113711381139
114011411142
1143114411451146
114711481149
115011511152
11531154
115511561157
11581159
11601161
1162
116311641165
1166
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
Joseph, S.E., Criscione, J.J., Davis, T.E., and Ehlig, P.L., 1982, The Lowe igneous pluton, in Fife, D.L., and Minch, J.A., eds., Geology and mineral wealth of the California Transverse Ranges: South Coast Geological Society Guidebook no. 10 (Mason Hill volume), p. 307-309.
Kendrick, K.J., Matti, J.C., Landis, G.P., and Alvarez, R.M., 2006, Fragmented landscapes in the San Gorgonio Pass region: Insights into Quaternary strain history of the southern San Andreas Fault system: Eos, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, v. 87(52), Fall Meeting Supplement, abstract # T21B-0406 (http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AGUFM.T21B0406K)
Kendrick, K.J., and Graham, R.C., 2004, Pedogenic accumulation in chronosequence soils: Soil Science Society of America, vol. 68, no. 4, p. 1295-1303
Kendrick, K. J., Matti, J. C., Mahan, S. A., and Landis, G. P., 2010, Pedogenic constraints on slip along the San Andreas Fault, southern California; Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 42, No. 5, p. 232
Lang, A. (1994). Infrared stimulated luminescence dating of Holocene reworked silty sediments: Quaternary Science Reviews, v. 13, no. 5-7, p. 525-528.
Langenheim, V.E., and Powell, R., 2009, Basin geometry and cumulative offsets in the Eastern Transverse Ranges, southern California: Implications for transrotational deforemation along the San Andreas fault system: Geosphere, v. 5, p. 1-22.
Matti, J.C., and Morton, D.M., 1993, Paleogeographic evolution of the San Andreas fault in southern California: a reconstruction based on a new cross-fault correlation, in Powell, R.E., Weldon, R.J., and Matti, J.C., eds., The San Andreas fault system: displacement, palinspastic reconstruction, and geologic evolution: Geological Society of America Memoir 178, p. 107-159.
Matti, J.C., Cox, B.F., Obi, C.M., Powell, R.E., Hinkle, M.E., Griscom, Andrew, and McHugh, E.L., 1982, Mineral resource potential of the Whitewater Wilderness Study Area, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties, California: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-1478, scale 1:62,500.
Matti, J.C., Cox, B.F., and Iverson, S.R., 1983, Mineral resource potential map of the Raywood Flat Roadless Areas, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, California: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-1563-A, scale 1:62,500.
Matti, J.C., Morton, D.M., and Cox, B.F., 1985, Distribution and geologic relations of fault systems in the vicinity of the central Transverse Ranges, southern California: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 85-365, 27 p., scale 1:250,000.
Matti, J.C., Morton, D.M., and Cox, B.F., 1992, The San Andreas fault system in the vicinity of the central Transverse Ranges Province, southern California: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 92-354, 40 p., scale 1:250,000
Matti, J.C., Carson, S.E., Kilburn, J.E., Griscom, Andrew, and Kuizon, Lucia, and Prose, D., 1988, Mineral resources of the Morongo Wilderness Study Area (CDCA-218),
51
1167116811691170
11711172117311741175
11761177
117811791180
118111821183
118411851186
11871188118911901191
1192119311941195
1196119711981199
120012011202
120312041205
12061207
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
San Bernardino County, California: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, 1710-B, 34 p.
McDougall, K., Poore, R.Z., and Matti, J.C., 1999, Age and environment of the Imperial Formation near San Gorgonio Pass, California: Journal of Foraminiferal Research, v. 29, no. 1, p. 4-25.
McFadden, L.D., 1982, The impacts of temporal and spatial climatic changes on alluvial soils genesis in southern California: Tucson, University of Arizona, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, 430 p.
McFadden, L.D., and Weldon, R.J., 1987, Geological Society of America Bulletin 98, no. 3, p. 280-293.
McGill, S.F., Owen, L.A., Weldon, R.J. II, Kendrick, K.J., 2013, Latest Pleistocene and Holocene slip rate for the San Bernardino strand of the San Andreas Fault, Plunge Creek, Southern California; implications for strain partitioning within the southern San Andreas fault system for the last approximately 35 k.y.: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 125, no. 1-2, p. 48-72.
Morton, D.M., Cox, B.F., and Matti, J.C. , 1980, Geologic map of the San Gorgonio Wilderness: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-1164-A, scale 1:62,500.
Nishikawa, T., Densmore, J.N., Martin, P., and Matti, J., 2003, Evaluation of the source and transport of high nitrate concentrations in ground water, Warren Subbasin, California: U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigation Report 03-4009, 133 p.
Peterson, M.S., 1975, Geology of the Coachella fanglomerate, in Crowell, J.C., ed., San Andreas fault in southern California: California Division of Mines and Geology Special Report 118, p. 119-126.
Peterson, M.D., and Wesnousky, S. G., 1994, Fault slip rates and earthquake histories for active faults in southern California: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 84, no. 5, p. 1608-1649.
Plesch, A., Shaw, J.H., Benson, C., Bryant, W.A., Carena, S., Cooke, M., Dolan, J., Fuis, G.S., Gath, E., Grant, L., Hauksson, E., Jordan, T., Kamerling, M., Legg, M., Lindvall, S., Magistrale, H., Nicholson, C., Niemi, N., Oskin, M., Perry, S., Planansky, G., Rockwell, T., Shearer, P., Sorlien, C., Suess, M.P., Suppe, J., Treiman, J., Yeats, R., 2007, Community Fault Model for Southern California; Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 97, no. 6, p. 1793-1802.
Powell, R.E., 1993, Balanced palinspastic reconstruction of pre-Late Cenozoic paleogeology, southern California: geologic and kinematic constraints on evolution of the San Andreas fault system, in Powell, R.E., Weldon, R.J., and Matti, J.C., eds., The San Andreas fault system: displacement, palinspastic reconstruction, and geologic evolution: Geological Society of America Memoir 178, p. 1-106.
52
12081209
121012111212
121312141215
12161217
12181219122012211222
122312241225
1226122712281229
123012311232
123312341235
123612371238123912401241
124212431244124512461247
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
Prescott, J. R. and Hutton, J.T., 1994, Cosmic ray contributions to dose rates for luminescence and ESR dating: large depths and long-term time variations, Radiation Measurements, v. 23, p. 497-500.
Richardson, C.A., McDonald, E.V. and Busacca, A.J., 1997, Luminescence dating of loess from the northwest United States, Quaternary Science Reviews, v. 16, no. 3-5, p. 403-415.
Sadler, P.M., 1993, The Santa Ana basin of the central San Bernardino Mountains; Evidence of the Timing of Uplift and Strike Slip Relative to the San Gabriel Mountains. Memoir - Geological Society of America, 178, 307-321.
Schoeneberger, P.J., Wysocki, D.A., Benham, E.C., and Broderson, W.D. (editors), 2002, Field book for describing and sampling soils, Version 2.0. Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, NE.
Singhvi, A.K., Sharma, Y.P. and Agrawal, D.P., 1982, Thermo-Luminescence Dating of Sand Dunes in Rajasthan, India, Nature, v. 295 (5847), p. 313-315.
Spinler J.C., Bennett, R.A., Anderson, M.L., McGill, S.F., Hreinsdóttir, S., McCallister, A., 2010, Present-day strain accumulation and slip rates associated with southern San Andreas and eastern California shear zone faults: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 115, B11407, doi:10.1029/2010JB007424
Spotila, J.A., Farley, K.A., and Sieh, K., 1998, Uplift and erosion of the San Bernardino Mountains associated with transpression along the San Andreas fault, California, as constrained by radiogenic helium thermochronometry: Tectonics, v. 17, p. 360-378.
Spotila, J.A., and Sieh, K.E., 2000, Architecture of transpressional thrust faulting in the San Bernardino Mountains, southern California, from deformation of a deeply weathered surface. Tectonics, 19(4), 589-615.
Spotila, J.A., Farley, K.A., Yule, J.D., and Reiners, P.W., 2001, Near-field transpressive deformation along the San Andreas fault zone in southern California, based on exhumation constrained by (U-Th)/He dating: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 106, no. B12, p. 30,909-30,922.
Torrent, J., Schwertmann, U., and Shulze, D.J., 1980, Iron oxide mineralogy of some soils of two river terrace sequences in Spain; Geoderma, v. 23, p. 191-208.
Vaughan, F.E., 1922, Geology of the San Bernardino Mountains north of San Gorgonio Pass: California University Publications in Geological Sciences, v. 13, p. 319-411.
Wesnousky, S.G., 1986, Eathquakes, Quaternary Faults, and Seismic Hazard California: Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 91, No. B12, P. 2587-2631.
Wobus, C., Whipple, K.X., Kirby, E., Snyder, N., Johnson, J., Spyropolou, K., Crosby, B., Sheehan, D., 2006, Tectonics from topography, Procedures, promise, and pitfalls: in Willett, S.D., Hovius, N., Brandon, M.T., and Fisher, D.M., eds., Tectonics, Climate, and Landscape Evolution: Geological Society of America Special Paper 398, p. 55-74.
53
124812491250
125112521253
125412551256
125712581259
12601261
1262126312641265
1266126712681269
127012711272
1273127412751276
12771278
127912801281
12821283
12841285128612871288
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
Yule, D., and Sieh, K., 2003, Complexities of the San Andreas fault near San Gorgonio Pass: implications for large earthquakes: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 108(B11), 2548, doi:10.1029/2001JB000451.
Yule, D., 2009, The enigmatic San Gorgonio Pass: Geology, Vol. 37, No. 2, p. 191-192.
Yule, D., 2010, Testing the “shakeout” scenario earthquake in San Gorgonio Pass; fact or fiction?: Abstracts with Programs – Geological Society of America, vol. 42, no. 4, p. 69
54
128912901291
1292
129312941295
1296
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
LISTING OF FIGURES AND TABLES
Figure 1. Index map showing the location of the San Gorgonio Pass within a regional
context. The San Gorgonio Pass is located between a step-over of the Mojave Desert
(MDS) and Coachella Valley (CVS) Segments of the San Andreas Fault.
Figure 2. Map showing location of Mission Creek and Raywood Flat study areas
(black boxes), relative to faults and basement-rock terranes in the region. Faults in red
are modern strands of the San Andreas Fault and the San Jacinto Fault; progressively
older strands of the San Andreas Fault include the Mill Creek strand (orange), Mission
Creek strand (Yellow), and Wilson Creek strand (blue). Magenta indicates the late
Miocene Banning fault. Paired black arrows indicate movement direction on strike-slip
faults; bar-and-ball symbol indicates down-thrown block of normal fault. Modified
slightly from Matti and others (1982) and Matti and Morton (1993). BPF, Beaumont
Plains Fault zone; CHH, Crafton Hills Horst and graben complex, GHF, Glen Helen
Fault; ICF, Icehouse Canyon Fault; MVF, Morongo Valley Fault; SCF San Antonio
Canyon Fault; SGPF, San Gorgonio Pass Fault zone; VT, Vincent Thrust.
Figure 3. Diagram illustrating displacement history of various faults in the greater
San Gorgonio Pass region, showing the timing of displacement (solid vertical lines) and
amount of right slip (in parentheses). From Matti and others, 1992; Matti and Morton,
1993. Note scale change at 1 Ma.
Figure 4. Geologic Map of the Mission Creek and Raywood Flat study areas.
Figure 5. Geomorphic summary of study area. Structural blocks include San
Gorgonio (SG), Yucaipa Ridge (YR), Pisgah Peak (PP), Kitching Peak (KP), and Devil’s
Garden (DG). Major drainages include North Fork Whitewater (NFWW), Hell For Sure
(HFS), Mission Creek (MC). The headwaters of the South Fork Whitewater (SFWW) are
55
1297
1298
1299
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
also delineated. Faults and fault strands are shown in red. White lines are the locations
of cross profiles in figure 13.
Figure 6. Google Earth image looking north to where the Mission Creek and Mill
Creek strands of the SAF intersect with the Pinto Mountain fault. This occurs at the
junction of three forks of Whitewater River, North Fork (NFWW), Middle Fork
(MFWW), and South Fork (SFWW). HFS, Hell-For-Sure Canyon, PH, volcanic-clast-
bearing sedimentary rocks that we correlate with the Painted Hill Formation; WR,
Whitewater River. Faults include: red, Mill Creek strand, San Andreas Fault; blue,
Mission Creek strand, San Andreas Fault; yellow, Pinto Mountain Fault. Line pattern
indicates crushed and sheared crystalline rocks of the Mission Creek fault zone.
Figure 7. Google Earth image looking north toward the alluviated Raywood Flat gap
in the Yucaipa Ridge block. Yellow fill represents surficial deposits; black dashed lines
indicate likely axes of longitudinal streams that deposited much of the materials that
underlie upper Raywood Flat (URF). Matti and others (1985, 1992) proposed that these
longitudinal streams headed onto the San Gorgonio block before drainage patterns were
disrupted by dextral slip on the Mill Creek strand of the San Andreas Fault. LRF, Lower
Raywood Flat; MCJ, Mill Creek Jump-off; SGM, San Gorgonio Mountain; MFWW,
Middle Fork Whitewater; SFWW, South Fork Whitewater; WWJ, Whitewater Jumpoff.
Faults include: red, Mill Creek strand, San Andreas Fault; blue, Mission Creek strand,
San Andreas Fault . Red arrow, orientation of figure 8.
Figure 8. View of Whitewater jump-off, showing contrasting lithologies across the
Mill Creek strand.
Figure 9. Geology of the surficial materials in the Mission Creek alluvial sequence,
located downstream from where Mission Creek exists the San Bernardino Mountains.
Younger units are progressively incised into older units, in the following order: very
56
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
1353
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
young wash deposits (Qvyw) incise Holocene through Pleistocene alluvial-fan deposits
(Qyf), that incise latest Pleistocene alluvial fan deposits (Qof3), that incise Late
Pleistocene fan deposits (Qof2). All of these units incise high-standing, well dissected
alluvial fan deposits (Qvof3, Qvof2) that have well-developed soil development,
indicating ages greater than 500 ka. Yellow dots, locations of soil descriptions; MC,
Miocene Coachella Conglomerate, including volcanic units (magenta color); Qdgw,
deformed gravels of Whitewater River of Allen (1957). MC, Mission Creek; WR,
Whitewater River. Faults include: red, Mill Creek strand, San Andreas Fault; blue,
Mission Creek strand, San Andreas Fault. Geology modified slightly from Matti and
others, 1982, 1983, 1985, 1992; Matti and Morton, 1993.
Figure 10. Geomorphology of Mission Creek alluvial complex.
Figure 11. Long profiles of the Mission Creek geomorphic surfaces.
Figure 12. Character of deposits of Raywood Flat.
Figure 13. Reconstruction of drainage- Hell For Sure and North Fork Whitewater
with Raywood Flat. Locations of cross profiles are from figure 5.
Figure 14. Reconstruction of slip on Mill Creek fault strand. W, Walthier’s Landing.
_____________________________________________________________
57
1354
1355
1356
1357
1358
1359
1360
1361
1362
1363
1364
1365
1366
1367
1368
1369
1370
1371
1372
1373
1374
1375
1376
1377
1378
1379
1380
Kendrick and others, 1/8/13
Table 1. Summary of pedogenic properties of the surfaces preserved in the Mission
Creek study area.
Table 2. Luminescence results of Qof2.
Table 3. Representative clast suites in stratigraphic units of the Mission Creek nested
alluvial complex.
Table 4. Clast-lithology frequency from observations in unit Qof2 (stations 1-3) and
Qvof2 (station 4). Every clast larger than ~ 2 cm within a 2m x 2m grid was counted.
Clast size ranges from 2 cm to 30 cm, with boulders comprising less than 1%.
Appendix A – Soil development
Appendix B – Luminescence Dating
58
1381
1382
1383
1384
1385
1386
1387
1388
1389
1390
1391
1392
1393
1394
1395
1396
1397