MINUTES OF THE LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE
Friday, January 11, 2013 9:00 A.M.
Members Present: Supervisors Merlin Gentz, Matthew Budde and Tom Laughrin Member Excused: Supervisor Ed Kleckner Member Absent: Supervisor Lyle Ott Also Present: Jay Shambeau, County Administrator; Mike Ottery, Highway Commissioner; Joann Dewhurst, ADRC Supervisor; Mark Morrison, Deputy Director of Health and Human Services; Representative Al Ott; Representative Daniel Lemahieu; Senator Joe Leibham; Ray Mueller, citizen; and Beth Hauser, County Clerk. The meeting was called to order at 9:00 A.M. by Chair Gentz. It was determined that the meeting was properly announced and the Pledge of Allegiance was recited. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND MINUTES: Moved by Supervisor Budde and seconded by Supervisor Laughrin to approve the agenda and minutes of the November 14, 2012 meeting as presented. Motion carried unanimously. INTRODUCTION OF LEGISLATORS: Representatives Al Ott and Daniel Lemahieu, and Senator Joe Leibham were introduced. They were asked to briefly update the Committee on important legislative activity and items of interest. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Ray Mueller, City of Chilton, addressed the Committee. SPECIAL BUSINESS: The following issues were discussed with the legislators:
Department of Health Services Contract for Non-Emergency Medical Transportation. Two handouts were distributed: Attachment #1 – NEMT Contract Recommendations provided by the Department of Health and Human Services and Attachment #2 – January 2, 2013 letter to the Joint Legislative Audit Committee Co-Chairs signed by forty-nine Senators and Representatives. There was a general discussion regarding concerns with the current vendors and with the RFP that was issued by the State on January 2. The timeline of the RFP was a concern to staff members.
Ray Mueller, Joann Dewhurst and Mark Morrison left the meeting at 10:00 A.M.
Preliminary Recommendations from the Wisconsin Commission on Transportation Finance and Policy. (Attachment #3) Staff requested feedback from our legislators regarding the preliminary recommendations on how to finance future transportation needs. If funding is not changed, the transportation infrastructures will continue to decline at a rapid speed. The legislators in attendance responded that they did not think these recommendations would move forward.
These Minutes HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED by the Legislative Committee
These Minutes HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED by the Legislative Committee
Wisconsin Department of Transportation Budget recently submitted to Governor
Walker’s Office that potentially delays the USH 10/441 project. A draft resolution (Attachment #4) was discussed. Our legislators were encouraged to support the reinstatement of the USH 10/441 project in the WI Dept of Transportation budget. Moved by Supervisor Budde and seconded by Supervisor Laughrin to forward the resolution to the full county board at its January meeting for consideration. Motion carried unanimously.
NEXT REGULAR MEETING DATE: The next regular meeting date will be March 8, 2013 at 9:00 A.M. ADJOURNMENT: Moved by Supervisor Budde and seconded by Supervisor Laughrin to adjourn the meeting at 10:35 A.M. Motion carried unanimously. Beth A. Hauser, Recording Secretary
Human Services (920) 849-1400
CALUMET COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Courthouse, 206 Court Street, Chilton, WI 53014 Todd M. Romenesko, Director
Public Health Home Health and Hospice
(920) 849-1432
Aging & Disability Resource Center
(920) 849-1451 Child Support (920) 849-1454
From Appleton: (920) 989-2700 Crisis Line: (920) 849-9317; (920) 832-4646 Website: www.co.calumet.wi.us
Legislative Meeting January 11 , 2013
Non Emergency Medical Transportation (NEMT) Contract Recommendations
1. We request the State Legislature direct the Legislative Audit Bureau to conduct an audit of the NEMT
contract with Logisticare (LGTC). Having accurate and timely information regarding the effectiveness of
services being provided to citizens is essential to moving forward with correcting existing problems for
service quality, efficiency a, accessibil ity and cost effectiveness. This is especially important since LGTC is
asserting there were problems with the first RFP and policies that DHS required them to work under.
Data shou ld be collected by the state to determine cost shifting to other local and state funded
transportation programs, which means taxpayers are paying twice for the same ride.
2. OHS should require third party independent oversight of the contract and the Provider. Currently the
NEMT provider determines eligibility, arranges the service and manages the grievance/problem resolution
process. This imposes an inherent conflict of interest. We respectfully recommend the Legislature require
the Department of Health Services to hold Logisticare, or any future NEMT contractor accountable for
identified outcomes. We recommend that the state appoint a third party reviewer to evaluate service
quality and contract compliance, as well as receive all service complaints. Data and statistics need to
reflect w hat is actually happening to consumers and our loca l transportation providers.
3. We recommend the state be required to apply existing financial penalties to providers who fail to meet
established performance targets. The State needs to implement immediate consequences when the
broker violates the contract. The broker must take responsibility for the actions of entities with which it
contracts. A complaint against a vendor is a complaint against the NEMT Provider. The NEMT vendor
should be held responsible for service failures and failure to pay providers.
4. Maintain transparency. There has been lack of disclosure during the previous contract about contract
terms and standards and policy changes that affect service delivery. For example, the current contract and
the RFP provide a system based on a flat per person rate -which does not provide an incentive for the
vendor to do whatever possible to get someone the ir ride . The vendor sti ll gets paid even when a needed
ride is not provided.
WISCONSIN LEGISLATURE P.O. BOX 8952 • MADISON, WI 53708
January 2, 2013
D ear Joint Legislative Audit Committee Co-Chairs,
We are writing to you again asking you as Co-Chairs of the Joint Legislative Audit Committee to
schedule a meeting of the Committee to include the topic of the Medical Assistance (lvfA) Non
Emergency Medical Transportation (NEMT) program. More than three months ago 51 legislators sent
a letter requesting an audit of this program; several developments since that time have led us to reiterate
our request, asking that the Legislative Audit Committee direct the Legislative Audit Bureau to conduct
a full audit of the NEMT program, including both contracts for brokerage.
\Y./e initially requested that the Committee d.i.tect the Audit Bureau to conduct an audit of this program
due to the many concerns and complaints that were shared with us by our constituents, agi..'lg and
disability advocates, transit advocates, and by users and providers of NEMT services. Since our initial
reguest this issue and this program has changed significantly. Firstly, we have seen an increase in
problems arising from the expansion of the program into Southeast Wisconsin. Complaints continue to
remain high after the inclusion of the HMO counties into the Statewide Program under J .ogistiCare.
Secondly, the questions and concerns that were raised in our previous letter have not been sufficiently
addressed by the D epartment o f Health Services' (DHS) response on November 16'h to your letter of
inquiry to the Department dated October 17, 2012. Additionally, On November 21, 2012 DHS released
a letter and press release stating that LogistiCare would be terminating their contract with the sl:.<'tte to
provide NEMT set-vices, effective Februaq 17, 2013. Lastly, since the announcement of LogistiCare's
intent to terminate the contract, emails from DHS to transportation providers, obtained by the
i\:filwaukee Journal Sentinel state: "The D epartment of Health Services ... will be releasing a new
(request for proposal;:;) and LogisciCare, along with others, will be competing for the work." LogistiCare
has severed its contract with the intent to bid on the new contract at a much greater rate, foJ: the sole
purpose of increasing the amount that they will be paid by the State.
In the letter sent by the CEO of LogistiCarc, Howard Schwarz, announcing the termination of the
contract, he blames t.he State and the Department for failing to provide utilization data on the program.
In the 2007-2009 Biennial Budget, the Department was directed to collect the utilization data for
common cattier transportation set-vices. At the time, common carrier transportation services were
considered Medical Assistance (iYfA) administration costs, which are matched by federal funds ar 50%,
but if data was collected from the Counties and the Tribes who were operating the services the State
could have received an increase in federal matching funds. Unfortunately, the Department did not
collect the data that was required and in the 2009-2011 Biennial Budget the requirement for a statewide
MA. Transport:ttion Manager was put into law.
CC: 1'1embers of Joint Legislative Audit Committee
Despite the fact that the company operating the contract, LogistiCare is backing out o f the contract, the
Legislature needs to know what was going on with the company and perhaps more importantly with
the Department of Health Services. The law has not changed and the next Re(]UCst for a Proposal
(.RPP) will be put forth by the Dcparunent in the coming weeks. We need to make sure that the
Department is acting in good faith, p roviding valid information so that we do not have ;mother
situation where a contracted company feels forced to terminate their contract with the State.
We arc VClJ concerned not only by LogistiCare's operation and administration of the NEMT contract
in Wisconsin, but also by the way the Department of Health Sct:vices has overseen the process. It is deeply concerning that not only did the Department fail to provide accurate infonuation in the RFP
and contract negotiations, but that it failed to ensure that the company was providing the Citizens of
Wisconsin and those who utilize these transportation services with the best service possible. We hope
that you take this renewed request fo.r an audit and the recent developments into consideration as we
move f01ward on this issue and a:; the Department submits a new RFP. We need to make sure that the
same mistakes on b o th sides do not occur in the future.
Sincerely,
A~~ Penny 13ernard Schaber
State Representative
57'11 Assembly District
101{ ~\})~v Bob Witch
State Senator 22"u Senate District
J' 'j /(
_., UQ. \ Steve Doyle
State Represen ativc
94'" Assembly District
/l / fl .. ~ ).._ {/
1 ,. ·/ ,-1 { •. ~ /~ ~/ ;/
Ch.tis Sinicki
State Representative
20'h Assembly District
Chris Larson
State Senator 7'h Senate District
Tamara Grigsby
State Representative
18'11 Assembly District
Terese Bcrceau
State Representative
76u' Assembly District
State Representative 1·1 th Assembly District
Brett Hulsey State Representative
77'h Assembly District
J ,//_ / 11 ~ ""~1v~0~M-e-~A~·~ Sondy Pope-Robetts ic lvlilt:oy
State Representative
79'h Assembly District
State Representative
73'd Assembly District
CC: Members of Joint Legislative Audit Comm..ittee
'~~~- L~~ J )
J;\net Bewley -
State Representative 74'h Assembly District
State Senator 4th Senate District
~}tJU,~~ . Louis Molepske
Tirn Cullen
State Senator L s•h Senate District
~~~ State Senator
21" Senate District
State Representative State epresentative
7 l'~ti~" Assembly District
fred Risser Jim Holpet1.tl
State Senator
2G'h Senate Di:; tr.ict
Z'JAAA ·a a__ Fred Clark
State Representatke
42"d Assembly D istrict
j2;/.£-Joe K n.ilaus
State Represen tativt::
44'" Assembly District
• ~A~!' .• (~Vu~-~k~~~~ ',.r;:-7\VVJ <::s t Jmy Sue Vruwink
State Representative
70'-" i\ssemblv District
State Senator lv;ta:;; Jifri Richards
State Representative
19'h Assembly District
a son
epresentative
62m1 Assembly District
~ 0 . I . ,r/
. 'vrk: ~~~1-V..t..-f~<'--Vo...-J'> / "" :
(/. Casta Zama:rnpa -.~ Stare Representative
R'" Asst::mbly D ist.rict
CC: ~~Iembers of] oint Legislative Audit Committee
Jon Erpenbach
State Senator
27'11 Senate District
04,~ ns o!!JI.tl,-,~~~ State Assembly
37'h Assembly D is trict
~ ~~ L'- t 'f.:- ~ -l ~ (ulie ],a?a State Senator 24'h Senate District
C~l' I• 1\(A-~/'.... LI.OS ay or {J'"') _.
State Representative
48'h Assembly District
f\ ~ ... ~ \=? K~s:sb.A Predcrick Kessler
State Representative
12'h Assembly Districr
State Representative
SO'h Assembly District
Gordon Hintz
State Representative
(};~b;;_/; ,J t{(; t-~f?{r Dale Schultz ~ ".:::-:> State Senator
17tl' Senate District
State Representative
4'h Assembly District
Tim Carpenter
State Senator
3'd Senate District
State Represcnlat-ivc
91" Assembly Disttict
Robert Tutner
State Represen tative
61•' Assembly Dis trict
r/ J/.·" 1 , -u; .. ...___ __ , :l.,, . ,. ! ~..._
Jill(~ illings State Representative
95'" Assembly District
: ;rl ) / '! ' . . ~ _/
/0
' I • I
~ ~~tvvdl!:tL State Senator
30'h Senate District
State ~ rcsentative
22"'1 Assembly District
Rep res en ta tive-Elect Representative-Elect
48'h Assembly District 78'" Assembly District
---!) h--1-.':., •• ~~~02. ~ ~-. - I \ ~\Muv l~~
Katrina Shankland
Represenm tive-Elect
71 ' 'Assembly District
'fod Olmstad Representative-Elect
65d' Assembly District
CC: Members of Joint Legislative Audit Committee
Mark Miller
State Senato r
16'" Senate District
Robb Kahl Representative-Elect
4Th Assembly District
-t~lav\ \~ < '"\A.i Ma~cl.y ~right ~ Represenra tive-Elect
HS'" Assembly District
NEWS Wisconsin Department of Transportation Office of Public Affairs, P.O. Box 7910, Madison, WI 53707-7910 608/266-3581 FAX: 608/266-7186 www.dot.wisconsin.gov
December 21, 201 2
For more information contact: Peg Schmitt (608) 266-7744, [email protected]
Transportation Commission releases preliminary recommendations
MADISON - At its December 5 meeting, the Wisconsin Transportation Finance and Policy
Commission gave preliminary approval to a set of recommendations on how to pay for new
transportation investments (details attached).
The 1 0-member citizen commission was created in the 2011-13 state biennial budget to advise
the Governor and Legislature on how to finance state transportation needs over the next 1 0
years.
The Commission expects to release its complete report and provide final approval of the
recommendations at its next meeting on January 23, 2013. A summary document detailing the
Commission's analysis and preliminary recommendations is available on the web at
http://www.dot.wisconsin.gov/about/tfp/index.htm
###
NOTE: View this document on the Web at: http://www.dot.wisconsin.gov/news/index.htm.
WISCONSIN TRANSPORTATION FINANCE AND POLICY COMMISSION PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATIONS
At its meeting on December 5, 2012, the Wisconsin Transportation Finance and Policy
Commission gave preliminary approval to a set of recommendations and findings. The 1 amember citizen commission was created by the 2011-13 state biennial budget to advise the
Governor and the Legislature on how to finance state transportation needs over the next 10
years. Since its inception in October 2011, the Commission has held 12 public meetings, four
public listening sessions, local official and stakeholder meetings, and focus group discussions.
The Commission's overall goal was to develop policy changes and financing options to balance
projected transportation needs with revenues over the next 10 years.
What the Commiss ion found
Wisconsin faces many challenges when it comes to meeting the growing needs of its
multimodal transportation network. The state's roads, bridges, railways, harbors, airports and
transit facilities are getting older and more congested. A growing segment of the population is
aging and increasingly dependent on public transit services. Wisconsin's economic future and
the safety of all of its residents and visitors depend on a quality transportation network that can
efficiently move people to jobs, raw materials to factories, finished products to markets, and
tourists to their destinations.
At the same time, the state's decades-old transportation funding model is not keeping pace
with current or future needs. The state has chosen to address its transportation funding shortfall
with increased debt through bond issuance -a path that is unsustainable over the long term.
Current revenue and travel trends
Over the past year, the Commission developed an understanding of the state's transportation
programs and services and how Wisconsin funds its entire multimodal transportation network.
A narrow state and federal funding base - primarily, motor fuel taxes and vehicle registration
fees - funds the transportation network and its maintenance needs, operations of the Division
of Motor Vehicles , and the Wisconsin State Patrol.
2
Improvements in motor vehicle fuel economy and the increasing popularity of hybrid and
electric vehicles are decreasing state and federal motor fuel tax collections. Additionally, since
2002, the number of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) has been essentia lly flat on a statewide basis.
Statewide VMT has declined over three percent from its peak in 2004, yet many urban areas of
the state are experiencing congestion. The result is increasing transportation needs and
decreasing revenues to address them.
The federal motor fuel tax (unchanged since 1993) is 18.4 cents per gallon, and the state motor
fuel tax is 30.9 cents per gallon.1 The last time the Legislature voted to increase the state motor
fuel tax was in 1997. Since 2006 when motor fuel tax indexing was repealed, inflation has
reduced the buying power of the state motor fuel tax by nearly 13 percent.
The state's decision to issue bonds to address the loss of revenues led to debt payments of
$762 million in the 2011-13 biennium. Assuming a simi lar level of bonding over the next 10
years, debt service will consume one-quarter of all state transportation revenues by FY 2023.
Review of transportation needs - four scenarios
The Commission scrutinized current state transportation investments to gain a better
understanding of how transportation assets and projects are currently managed and how
overall performance is measured. To better understand the potential needs of the transportation
network in the future , the Commission considered four scenarios that define the condition of the
network by 2023, at different investment levels. ·
The four needs analyses -from system disinvestment to multi modal enhancements - allowed
commissioners to consider the funding levels needed to address specific goals for the condition
of the transportation network over the next 10 years. The four scenarios gave the Commission
a common perspective from which to develop its recommendations. All scenarios assume a
total of almost $25 bil lion in state and federal transportation revenues over the decade.
• Scenario One - Disinvestment: Scenario One holds transportation expenditures at
current levels over the next 10 years resulting in a 15.7 percent reduction in purchasing
power. This scenario envisions significant deterioration of the state transportation
1 An additional 2.0 cents goes to the Petroleum Inspection Fund.
3
network. The condition of state and local highway pavements and bridges deteriorate.
Planned major highway projects are delayed several years . Funding for transit, rail,
harbors and airports is not adequate to maintain current conditions and service levels.
Projected 1 0-year cost: $27 billion. Funding gap: $2 bill ion.
• Scenario Two- Preservation: Scenario Two preserves existing transportation services
and the physical condition of the system at current levels over the next decade. This
scenario does not address traffic congestion issues, resulting in a 50 percent increase in
congested roadway miles. Projected 1 0-year cost: $30.8 billion. Funding gap: $5.8
billion.
• Scenario Three- Capacity Management: Scenario Three keeps current transportation
services, conditions, and traffic congestion at current levels and allows highway
maintenance and traffic operations services to keep pace with needs. Funding for other
transportation modes keeps pace with inflation. Projected 1 0-year cost: $40.3 billion.
Funding gap: $15.3 billion.
• Scenario Four- Multimodal Enhancements: Along with meeting goals noted in
Scenario Three, this alternative scenario addresses basic needs of public transit, airport,
freight rail and commercial port systems. Projected 1 0-year cost: $42.1 billion. Funding
gap: $17.1 billion.
Scenarios two through four focus on preserving the condition and service levels of the
multimodal transportation network. The Commission found that, over 10 years, more than $6
billion of new investment will be needed to preserve the current condition and service levels of
Wisconsin's transportation network -even more if the network is enhanced.
4
The consequences of no action
• Without additional investment, the percentage of state and local highway pavements
and bridges in poor or worse condition will increase from 20 percent in 2014 to
42 percent in 2023.
• Planned major highway projects will be delayed six years, resulting in a 22 percent
increase in congested highway miles.
• Maintenance and traffic operations will continue to be underfunded, resulting in less
investment in traveler warning and road weather management systems, deferred routine
maintenance, longer time frames for snow removal after winter storms, and higher costs
for road repair in the future.
• State transit funding will decline, resulting in reduced transit service in our communities,
unless local governments significantly increase their share of funding. Further, without a
local revenue mechanism, local governments will continue to rely on property taxes to
fund their local transit share.
• The state will be unable to maintain current conditions in freight rail , airports, harbors,
bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
The Commission's investment plan
After careful consideration of the impact of a "do nothing" approach, the Commission developed
its program and funding recommendations to assure an acceptable condition level for the
transportation network. These recommendations are not a wish list - they essentially fund
programs to maintain condition and congestion levels that exist today through 2023. The
Commission recommends the following increased investments on an annual basis:
• State highway rehabilitation, maintenance and modernization $387.1 million
• Local highways and bridges $ 40.0 million
• Public transit $ 36.3 million
• Airports , rails, harbors, bicycle and pedestrian facilities $ 16.1 million
5
To pay for these new investments without excessive borrowing, the Commission recommends:
• Increasing the state motor fuel tax by 5 cents per gallon;
• Adopting a new mileage-based registration fee of 1.02 cents per mile for passenger cars
and light trucks. Under this system, the first 3,000 miles would be free, and the
maximum number of miles charged for would be 20,000. This fee would be computed
based on odometer readings reported by the vehicle owner at the time of annual
reg istration ;
• Increasing annual registration fees for commercial vehicles in proportion to the
increases for the average passenger vehicle ;
• Increasing the fee for an eight-year driver license by $20; and
• Eliminating the sales tax exemption on the trade-in value of vehicles.
If the Commission's recommendations are adopted, the fuel taxes and registration fees on a
typical Wisconsin passenger vehicle will increase by $120 per year, or about 33 cents per day.
In addition, the Commission found that local governments should have additional revenue
options, beyond the property tax levy, to support transit services. The Commission
recommends that the Legislature enact legislation to allow for the creation of regional
transportation authorities with the power to levy a 0.5 percent transportation sales tax, subject
to voter approval. At least 75 percent of this tax must be used to support transit, while the
remainder could be used for any transportation purpose.
Finally , while the Commission reviewed tolling , they found that current federal regulations on
tolling create an obstacle to its implementation in Wisconsin. The Commission encourages the
Wisconsin Congressional Delegation to support federal legislation that allows states more
flexibility to toll on the National Highway System.
The Commission expects to release its complete report on January 23, 2013. A summary
brochure is available at http://www.dot.wisconsin .gov/aboutltfp/index.htm
6
. '
RESOLUTION 2012-
THE COUNTIES OF WINNEBAGO, CALUMET AND OUTAGAMIE JOINTLY URGE THE WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT) TO NOT DELAY THE DESIGN
AND RECONSTRUCTION OF THE US 10-441 PROJECT
To the Honorable Chair and Board of Supervisors of Calumet County, Wisconsin:
WHEREAS, The Wisconsin DOT has nominated the US 1 0/Wisconsin 441 project as a potential candidate for delay in the DOT budget, submitted recently to Governor Walker; and
..
WHEREAS, This project has a significant impact to the_.economic health of the Fox Valley and the counties of Winnebago, Calumet and Outagamie, along with providing a valuable transportation link to travelers and commerce working ,anc;l traveling in and around the area; and
WHEREAS, The US 1 0/Wisconsin 441 prc;:>]eC.t has been.di_sclJssed and studied for many years. The existing corridor carries considerabl/.more volume than canbe efficiently or safely accommodated. The geometries of the corridor. are less than desirabi~\vhen compared to current volumes and the existing interchange with USH 41 performs wei I under standards for safety; and '; · ....... ..<{~t': . ''(':,· ·
'~-~·: ''•;, :/: ~;
WHEREAS, The DOT Secret~ry ,Mark Gottli~~/~:~~l~~~~onded to poten~~-~1" funding shortfalls in the proposed DOT budget hinofDi.nating sever~l.,projects ·for delay in order to address funding shortfalls . The action· q()es· hotconsider or ~ijy~ _appropriate weight to the impacts to local or State-wi_qe travel needs·. or the economics ofthe . .region.
/'ff~:7~:~:~~=~--:~~~jh, · · ·:~--~,·~~ . -~~:_;~~:~· / _}-:·_> :. ':<~:hi:'. NOW, THERI.:f,ORE BE.J[.RESOLVI;D, That the' couq,~j~s of Winnebago, Calumet and
Outagamie jointly re'ct~e.st that fuliJ~_I)ding for the,'IJS. 1 0/Wiscohsin 441 project be restored and the nomination of this 'pf<;>je.~t for de.!~Y be withd~a0n from the proposed DOT budget.
.. . . .. , -.:f:;~~.\-~::. . -<::-;L~~_:_h~:~~!~(;~ ~- ·._ .· ·: . BE IT: FURT~~ RESQI,VED;'Tha(the proposed schedule for the project be fully
restored 'arid 'the tu'ndl~g .deditate'd so as 'to: continue' the progress of the project and bring about the recdns.truction as fla$ been pi~i:1ned by thebOT and generally accepted and understood by
the pubiit:.:" __ :,_· .. :.:_··~'. ··.,: •:·:. :: ·: ,, ·t . _~jf._~'.:·' ... ·.·· ~ --::~:~~;_·':\ . . . :;;;~ .. :
BE rr F:URTHER RESb~VED, 1-~~t the Calumet County Clerk is requested to forward this resolution to aii:YVinnebago;;:talumet, and Outagamie County State Legislators, Wisconsin Secretary of Transportation Mar~· Gottlieb, and Governor Scott Walker .
• ·· · !•- !_:1 •
Dated January 22, 20·~:;·\~;\ , _. : :~~:·.THE HIGHWAY COMMITTEE & LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE