The Advanced Technology The Advanced Technology ProgramProgram
In Partnership withIn Partnership withNIST and the NationNIST and the Nation
Marc G. StanleyMarc G. StanleyDirector, ATPDirector, ATP
(301) [email protected] | www.atp.nist.gov
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
ATP Mission …ATP Mission …
To accelerate the development of innovative technologies for broad national benefit through partnerships with the private sector.
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
ATP is a Part of NIST
NIST Assets Include:• 3,000 employees
• 1,600 associates
• $773 million FY 2004 operating budget
• NIST Laboratories
• Advanced Technology Program
• Manufacturing Extension Partnership
• Baldrige National Quality Award
NIST’s mission: Strengthen the U.S. economy and improve the quality of life by working with industry to develop and apply technology, measurements, and standards.
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Key Features of the ATP
• Emphasis on innovation for broad national economic benefit
• Industry leadership in planning and implementing projects
• Project selection based on technical and economic merit
• Demonstrated need for ATP funding
• Requirement that projects have well-defined goals/sunset provisions
• Project selection rigorously competitive, based on peer review
• Program evaluation from the outset
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Fourteen Years of Innovation
• Since 1990, 6,054 proposals submitted to 43 competitions, requesting $12,969 million from ATP
• 709 projects awarded with 1,433 participants and an equal number of subcontractors
• 207 joint ventures and 502 single companies
• $4,101 million of high-risk research funded– ATP share = $2,114 million– Industry share = $1,987 million
• Small businesses are thriving– 65% of projects led by small businesses
• Over 165 universities participate• Over 30 national laboratories participate
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Participation in the ATP …
* Geographic location is not a consideration in project selection. The ATP has an active outreach program that seeks to increase awareness across the entire nation of the program's opportunities for small, medium, and large businesses and other organizations. To date, ATP has received applications from organizations based in every state, and has provided funding to participating organizations located in 40 states, and the District of Columbia.
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Innovations: Digital X-Ray Wireless Communications DNA Diagnostics Fuel Cells Electronics/Photonics Healthcare Informatics Civil Infrastructure HDTV Many more …
Technologies in Your States …
IllinoisIllinois
CaliforniaCalifornia
VirginiaVirginia
MichiganMichigan
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
State of Michigan* …
167167 5050
280280
InformationTechnology
($9.1 M)4%
Electronics/Photonics($34.2 M)
17%
AdvancedMaterials/Chemistry($63.7 M)
31%
Manufacturing ($90.3 M)
45%
Biotechnology ($5.2 M)
3%
* Dollars represent ATP Amount
Leads OnlyLeads Only
ApplicationsAwards
Participants
Legend
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Exciting New Technologies …
Exciting New Technologies …
Bridging the Gap Between the Laboratory and the
Marketplace
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Today’s Investments …
Electronics and Electronics and Photonics Photonics
Microelectronics Optoelectronics Optics Technologies Power Technologies Wireless Electronics Organic Electronics
BiotechnologyBiotechnology
DNA Technologies Tissue Engineering Drug Discovery Methods Proteomics Medical Devices &
Imaging Microfluidics
Chemistry and Chemistry and Materials Materials
Chemical Processing Sensors
Metabolic Engineering/Catalysis
Combinatorial Methods Separations/Membranes Materials Processing Advanced Materials Nanotechnology Material Interfaces
Manufacturing Manufacturing
Information Information Technology Technology Advanced Learning
SystemsComponent-Based SoftwareDigital Video Information Infrastructure
for HealthcareElectronic CommerceDependable Computing
SystemsTechnologies for the
Integration of Manufacturing Applications
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Biotechnology ($420 M)20%
Information Technology($484 M)
23%
Electronics/Photonics($519 M)
25%
Advanced Materials and Chemistry($447 M)
21%
Manufacturing (Discrete)($244 M)
11%
Forty Three Competitions (1990 – September 2003)
709 ATP Awards by Technology Area
As a Percent of $2,114 M Awarded
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Small65%
Medium12%
Large17%
Other6%
Distribution of Company Size
Lead Companies709 ATP Awards
Forty Three Competitions (1990 – September 2003)
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
ATP: Strengthening America’s
Photonics Industry … Since 1998
Nearly $293 million ofhigh technical risk R&D funded
ATP share = $147 millionIndustry share = $146 million
Large cross section ofparticipants
65 Companies, 4 UniversitiesPlus many subcontractors
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Ongoing Projects in Photonics
• Optoelectronics and Lasers
• Sensors, Metrology and Inspection
• Data Storage
• Displays and Imaging
• Lighting and Illumination
• Bio-photonics
• Nanotechnology and Materials
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Nanotechnology ... since 1991
39 ATP awardsin Nanotechnology24 Single applicants
15 Joint ventures
Approximately $276 million ofhigh technical risk R&D funded
ATP share = $141.5 millionIndustry share = $134.4 million
Large cross-section ofparticipants
69 Companies, 2 Non-profits, 4 UniversitiesOver 90 subcontractors, including 43 universities
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Ongoing Projects inNanotechnology
• Nanostructured Materials
• Nanofabrication Techniques and Tools
• Nanometrology
• Nanoelectronics and Photonics
• Nanodiagnostics
• Nanobiotechnology
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
ATP Investments in Technologies Related to
Homeland Security
• 106 projects• $543M total investment
$290M ATP share $254M industry share
CIP/CS6%
CPI42%
CBRNE42%
BIOMET7%3%
SI
(data compiled over 43 competitions, 1990 – June 2002)
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
ATP Manufacturing Support
(as a Percentage of $244 M)
Misc.27%
Design12%
Control6%
Assembly8%
Tools1%
Forming27%
Inspection8%
Machining11%
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Competition Structure
2004 Technology-Specific Project Selection Committees
Electronics & Photonics
Biotechnology
Information Technology
Chemistry & Materials
Industry’sInnovative
Ideas
Industry’sInnovative
Ideas Awards
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
For-profit company 3-year time limit $2M award cap Company pays indirect
costs Large companies cost
share at least 60% of total project cost
At least 2 for-profit companies 5-year time limit No limit on award amount (other
than availability of funds) Industry share >50% total cost
As a Single Company: As a Single Company:
Two Ways to Apply …
ATP encourages teaming arrangements
Most projects involve alliances
As a Joint Venture: As a Joint Venture:
ResearchLab
With Subcontractors
Consortium
Company
University
ResearchLab
University
+
Formal AlliancesAlone With Subcontractors
University
Company
Company
Company
Company
Company
ResearchLab
Company
Company
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Two Major Criteria
•Scientific and Technological Merit (50%)– Technical Rationale
high technical risk & feasibilitytechnological innovation
– R&D Plan
•Potential for Broad-Based Economic Benefits (50%)– National Economic Benefits– Need for ATP Funding– Pathway to Economic Benefits
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
What we look for
•Focus on the civilian sector•Focus on enabling technologies with high
spillover potential•Focus on overcoming difficult research
challenges•Company-university-laboratory
collaboration, when appropriate•Coordination with other public and private
funding sources•Clear position after basic science and
before product development•Clear pathway to the market
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
In Short…
• The ATPs bottom line is broad benefits for the nation – jobs, economic growth, better quality of life – rooted in innovative technologies. Specifically, we are looking for R&D projects that create:
– Technologies with benefits that extend well beyond the companies involved in the project.
– Technologies with broad potential applications, particularly across different industrial sectors; and
– Path-breaking technologies that open up new potential markets or make possible wholly new products or industrial processes.
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
What Can ATP Do for You?
• Create sustainable technical advantage– you direct the research goals
– we share in the risk of longer-range, higher-payoff research
– ATP commits ~ $1,000,000 per year per project
• Retain your Intellectual Property Rights– U.S. for-profit companies keep rights to intellectual
property from ATP-funded projects
• Encourage integration of business and technical planning– plan now for commercializing your research results
– attend ATP-sponsored workshops with venture capitalists
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
What Can ATP Do for You? (cont’d)
•Gain recognition within industrial and financial sectors– an ATP award will attract attention from
investors, strategic partners, potential customers, and others
•Find partners through our website– visit ATP’s Collaboration Bulletin Board– join ATP’s Alliance Network List Server
•We are flexible and fair, but firm– we will monitor your progress, but also be
supportive if roadblocks appear as long as the project continues to meet the criteria
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Is ATP Right for You?
• Are you looking to further your technical advantage by conducting challenging research?
• Are the risks primarily technical?
• Does your project have the potential to generate broad-based economic benefits for the United States?
• Are you committed to taking the research into the marketplace?
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
“The SBIR and the ATP programs are different in important ways. However, they can be understood as separate steps on a national innovation ladder.”
ATP and SBIR
National Research CouncilThe Advanced Technology
Program: Assessing Outcomes
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
•ATP is open to companies of all sizes
•Some SBIR funding is agency/mission specific
•ATP’s collaborative focus and flexibility of funding enable industry to address large problems
•ATP funding is available to all technologies
•ATP requires cost-sharing – commitment to commercialization
ATP and SBIR
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Program Results
•Portfolio of Tissue Engineering Projects ($10.9 B)
•Closed Cycle Air Refrigeration– $459 M in public benefits projected
•Data Storage– $3.7 B in consumer benefits projected
•Component-based Software Projects– $840 M in public and private returns
•Flow Control Machining: Impact on the Auto Industry– $142 M increase in GDP annually
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Program Results
•Considerable success in advancing technologies that can contribute to important societal goals
•Net benefits of a handful of projects analyzed to date: $15 B
– Far exceeding ATP’s total cost
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
INDIVIDUAL
State ResourcesFEDERAL FUNDING
(ATP, SBIR, MEP etc.)
VENTURE CAPITALSTATE FUNDING
GENERAL ASSISTANCE
Encouraging State Involvement
How can your state be a resource?
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Encouraging State Involvement
Sustained Economic Growth within your State bySustained Economic Growth within your State by• Fostering high-risk technologies
• Developing revolutionary technology– products - processes - services
• Broad-based economic benefits to your state and nation
• Economic activity
Foster business infrastructure of StateFoster business infrastructure of State• Encourage partnerships between state industries, universities,
incubators, and federal government to compete globally
Benefits of working with ATP …
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
What We Would Like Your State to Do …
• Expand opportunities to engage:
– Small businesses
– Medium and large businesses
– Universities
• Bring the best R&D projects to ATP for
potential funding
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
•Call toll-free: 800-ATP-FUND (800-287-3863) •Fax your name and address to: 301-926-9524
•Send e-mail to: [email protected]
•Visit ATP’s website: www.atp.nist.gov
For Info on ATP and to Join Our Mailing List . . .
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
ADDITIONAL SLIDES
ADDITIONAL SLIDES
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Addressing a NationalProblem or Need
Evidence•Federal funding plays a critical
role in crossing the Valley of Death– ATP represents a more important
element in bridging this gap than may have been appreciated
– VC, State Government and Universities only contribute between 8 and 16% toward early stage technology development
– ATP and SBIR account for between 21 and 25%
Lewis M. BranscombAetna Professor of Public PolicyAnd Corporate Management, emeritusKennedy School of Government, Harvard University
Philip E. AuerswaldAssistant Director, Science,Technology, and Public Policy ProgramKennedy School of Government, Harvard University
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Early-Stage Technology Development
Note: The proportional distribution across the main funding sources for early-stage technology development is similar regardless of the use of restrictive or inclusive definitional criteria.
Estimated distribution of funding sources for early-stage technology development, based on restrictive and inclusive criteria
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
The Washington PostMonday, May 5, 2003
Venture Capital Investments
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Evidence–• In 709 awards, $2,114 million in
ATP funds matched by $1,987 million in industry cost-share
Federal Role Critical
Leverages funds and contributions from other parties …
ATP Award Statistics
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Appendix A: ATP Statute[Note: The ATP statute originated in the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100-418, 15 U.S.C. 278n) but was amended by the American Technology Preeminence Act of 1991 (Pub. L. 102-245).]
SUBPART C – ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM
SEC. 5131. ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM
(a) Advanced Technology Program. – The Act of March 3, 1901, as amended by this part, is further amended by adding after section 27 the following new section:
“ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM
“SEC.28.(a) There is established in the Institute an Advanced Technology Program (hereafter in this Act referred to as the ‘Program’) for the purpose of assisting United States businesses in creating and applying the generic technology and research results necessary to –
“(1) commercialize significant new scientific discoveries and technologies rapidly; and
“(2) refine manufacturing technologies.
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
The Competitive Environment
•Advances in technology account for more than 50 % of U.S. economic growth
•Global competition has forced a focus on short-term return on investment
•Now more than ever, our nation’s economic well being depends on rapid development and commercialization of technology
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Participation in ATP …
Joint Ventures29%
Single Companies71%
709 ATP Awards(Forty Three Competitions (since 1990)
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Lessons Learned
•Address a National Problem or Need
•Avoid Duplication of Effort
•Keep it at the Most Appropriate
Level
•Strong, Well-Publicized Criteria
•Leverage Other Resources
•Evaluate Early and Often
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Lessons Learned
•Address a National Problem or Need
•Avoid Duplication of Effort
•Keep it at the Most Appropriate
Level
•Strong, Well-Publicized Criteria
•Leverage Other Resources
•Evaluate Early and Often
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
National Problem or Need: The Competitive
Environment•Advances in technology
account for more than 50 % of U.S. economic growth
•Global competition has forced a focus on short-term return on investment
•Now more than ever, our nation’s economic well being depends on rapid development and commercialization of technology
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Evidence
•Federal funding plays a critical role in crossing “Darwinian Sea”
– ATP represents a more important element in bridging this gap than may have been appreciated
– VC, State Government and Universities only contribute between 8 and 16% toward early stage technology development
– ATP and SBIR account for between 21 and 25%
Addressing a NationalProblem or Need
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Crossing the Valley of Death only to …
“Valley of Death”
Research & Invention
Innovation: new businessViableViable
BusinessBusiness
The Darwinian SeaBasic Basic
ResearchResearch
InventionInvention Innovation&
New Business
… arrive in the Waters of the Darwinian Sea
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Addressing a National Problem or Need
Investments in–
Manufacturing: $224 M
Tissue Engineering: $100 M
Nanotechnology: $142 M
Homeland Security $290 M
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Key Features of the ATP
•Focuses on the civilian sector•Focuses on enabling technologies with high
spillover potential•Focuses on overcoming difficult research
challenges•Encourages company-university-laboratory
collaboration•Coordinates with other public and private
funding sources•Positioned after basic science and before
product development
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Lessons Learned
•Address a National Problem or Need
•Avoid Duplication of Effort
•Keep it at the Most Appropriate
Level
•Strong, Well-Publicized Criteria
•Leverage Other Resources
•Evaluate Early and Often
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Since 1990 …Since 1990 …
• 6,054 proposals submitted to 43 competitions, requesting $12,969 M from ATP
• 709 projects awarded with 1,433 participants and an equal number of subcontractors
• 207 joint ventures and 502 single companies• $4,101 M of high-risk research funded
– ATP share = $2,114 M– Industry share = $1,987 M
• Small businesses are thriving– 65% of projects led by small businesses
• Over …– 165 universities participate– 30 national laboratories participate– 900 patents
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Lessons Learned
•Address a National Problem or Need
•Avoid Duplication of Effort
•Keep it at the Most Appropriate
Level
•Strong, Well-Publicized Criteria
•Leverage Other Resources
•Evaluate Early and Often
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
“The selection criteria applied by the program enable it to meet broad national needs and help ensure that the benefits of successful awards extend across firms and industries.”
National Research CouncilThe Advanced Technology
Program: Assessing Outcomes
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Two Major CriteriaTwo Major Criteria
• Scientific and Technological Merit (50%)– Technical innovation– High technical risk with evidence of
feasibility– Detailed technical plan
• Potential for Broad-Based Economic Benefits (50%)– National economic benefits– Need for ATP funding– Pathway to economic benefits
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Project Selection
Process
CooperativeAgreement
CooperativeAgreement
SCREENING
CLASSIFICATION
Gate 2: FULL ECONOMIC/BUSINESS
PROPOSAL + BUDGET NARRATIVE
Gate 2: FULL ECONOMIC/BUSINESS
PROPOSAL + BUDGET NARRATIVE
Gate 3: SEMIFINALISTS IDENTIFIED
Oral review
Gate 4: AWARD
PROPOSALS
Gate 1: FULL TECHNICAL PLAN + PRELIMINARY ECON/BUS PLANECONOMIC/BUSINESS MERIT
Technical Innovation High Technical Risk with Evidence of Feasibility Detailed R&D Plan
SCIENTIFIC & TECHNOLOGICAL MERIT
National Economic Benefits Need for ATP Funding Pathway to Economic Benefits
DEBRIEFING
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
The Gated ApproachThe Gated Approach
• Gate 1: Executive Summary, complete technical narrative, plus preliminary info on economic/business narrative
• Gate 2: Complete economic/business narrative, plus detailed budget information, if pass gate 1
• Gate 3: Semifinalist, if pass gate 2
• Gate 4: Award, if pass gate 3 and selected
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Lessons Learned
•Address a National Problem or Need
•Avoid Duplication of Effort
•Keep it at the Most Appropriate
Level
•Strong, Well-Publicized Criteria
•Leverage Other Resources
•Evaluate Early and Often
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Evidence–
• In 709 awards, $2.1 Billion in ATP funds
matched by $1.9 Billion in industry cost-
share
•Awarding-winning firms have greater
success in attracting additional funding
for their ATP projects from other
sources (“Halo Effect”)
Leveraging Private-Sector Resources
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
INDIVIDUAL
State Resources FEDERAL FUNDING(ATP, SBIR, MEP etc.)
VENTURE CAPITALSTATE FUNDING
GENERAL ASSISTANCE
Leveraging State Resources
Can states be a resource?
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Encouraging State Involvement
Sustained Economic Growth within your Sustained Economic Growth within your State byState by
• Fostering high-risk technologies
• Developing revolutionary technology– products - processes - services
• Broad-based economic benefits to your state and nation
• Economic activity
Foster business infrastructure of StateFoster business infrastructure of State• Encourage partnerships between state industries,
universities, incubators, and federal government to compete globally
Benefits of working with ATP …
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
What We Would Like Your State to Do …
•Expand opportunities to engage:
– Small businesses
– Medium and large businesses
– Universities
•Bring the best R&D projects to ATP for potential funding
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Lessons Learned
•Address a National Problem or Need
•Avoid Duplication of Effort
•Keep it at the Most Appropriate
Level
•Strong, Well-Publicized Criteria
•Leverage Other Resources
•Evaluate Early and Often
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
“An Exceptional Assessment Effort:
The ATP assessment program has produced one of the most rigorous and intensive efforts of any U.S. technology program.”National Research Council
The Advanced Technology Program: Assessing Outcomes
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Other OrganizationsOther Organizations
IndustryIndustry
Why Assess?
To better manage the To better manage the
ATP!ATP!
To answer to our To answer to our
“Stakeholders”!“Stakeholders”!
GovernmentPerformanceResults Act
(GPRA)
GovernmentPerformanceResults Act
(GPRA)
CongressCongress
TaxpayersTaxpayersNISTNISTDoCDoC
To comply with the To comply with the
Law!Law!
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Components of ATP’s Assessment Program
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
FY2004 Competition
• Federal Register Announcement:– ATP 2004 budget includes $60.7 million
for new awards
– Continued streamlined competition process
– New ATP Proposal Preparation Kit (02/04)
– Optional electronic submissions for all proposers
• ATP automatically sends out Kit and announcements to mailing list
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
FY2004 Competition Important Dates
•The Competition is currently open
•The deadline is:
–Wednesday, April 14, 2004
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
FY2004 CompetitionImportant Information
• To be considered for funding in Fiscal Year 2004– Proposers must submit their
Gate 1 proposals by Wednesday, April 14, 2004
• All hand-delivered or electronically submitted proposals must be received by 3:00 PM Eastern time on April 14, 2004
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
FY2004 CompetitionImportant Information
(cont’d)•All other carrier delivered proposals
must be postmarked by the due date (April 14, 2004) and received no later than 3:00 P.M. Eastern time on:– Wednesday, April 28, 2004
• Proposals submitted through guaranteed overnight carriers are deemed to be postmarked on the date they are delivered to the carrier
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Points of Contact
•Competition process, project selection criteria, or other programmatic questions
– Bettijoyce Lide, (301) 975-2218
•Eligibility and cost-sharing requirements, budgets, or other administrative matters
– Barbara Lambis, (301) 975-4447
•Human and/or animal subjects used in research
– Phone: (301) 975-8779
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Points of Contact (cont’d)
• Electronic Submission System– John Garguilo, (301) 975-4426
• Foreign participation as single-company proposers, joint ventures, or subcontractors – Connie Chang, (301) 975-4318
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
•Call toll-free: 800-ATP-FUND (800-287-3863) •Fax your name and address to: 301-926-9524
•Send e-mail to: [email protected]
•Visit ATP’s website: www.atp.nist.gov
For Info on ATP and to Join Our Mailing List . . .
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
ATP Investments in Technologies Related toHomeland Security
(data compiled over 43 competitions, 1990 – June 2002)
CIP/CS6%
CPI42%
CBRNE42%
BIOMET7%3%
• 106 projects• $543M total investment
$290M ATP share $254M industry share
SI
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
ATP Investments in Technologies in Support ofHomeland Security Relate to NIST SFAs
HEALTH CARE
NANOTECHNOLOGY
IT/ KM
HOMELAND SECURITY
• Biometrics
• CBRNE: Chemical/Biological/Radiological/Nuclear/Exposure
• CPI: Critical Physical Infrastructure
• TIR: Technologies for Incident Response
• CIP: Critical Infrastructure Protection
• CS: Cyber-security
• S&I: Surveillance and Intelligence
• CDM: Critical Defense Manufacturing
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Nanotechnology ... since 1991
39 ATP awardsin Nanotechnology24 Single applicants
15 Joint ventures
Approximately $276 million ofhigh technical risk R&D funded
ATP share = $141.5 millionIndustry share = $134.4 million
Large cross-section ofparticipants
69 Companies, 2 Non-profits, 4 UniversitiesOver 90 subcontractors, including 43 universities
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Ongoing Projects in Nanotechnology
Nanostructured Materials
Nanofabrication Techniques & Tools
Nanometrology
Nanoelectronics & Photonics
Nanodiagnostics
Nanobiotechnology
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
ATP Strengthening America’sPhotonics Industry … since
1998 Nearly $293 million of
high technical risk R&D fundedATP share = $147 million
Industry share = $146 million
Large cross section ofparticipants
65 Companies, 4 UniversitiesPlus many subcontractors
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Ongoing Projects inPhotonics
Optoelectronics and Lasers
Sensors, Metrology & Inspection
Data Storage
Displays & Imaging
Lighting & Illumination
Bio-photonics
Nanotechnology and Materials
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
ATP in Tissue Engineering
ATP awards in tissue engineering target a wide range of technologies that address treatment methodologies for many important families of disease. In addition to the high levels of mortality and the associated indirect cost of morbidity caused by these diseases, the annual financial burden of treatment in the United States is substantial.
DiseaseDiabetesHeart DiseaseLiver DiseaseLung DiseaseKidney DiseaseParkinson’s DiseaseCancerArthritis and Osteoporosis
Estimated Annual Direct
Cost of Treatment$44 billion
$182 billion$9 billion
$65 billion$18 billion$6 billion
$61 billion$82 billion
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
ATP in Tissue Engineering
•In the field of tissue engineering, ATP has funded 51 projects; contributing nearly $100 million with corporate partnerships adding an additional $81 million.
•The estimated market for the regeneration of bone, cartilage, and other connective structural treatments is approximately $15 billion worldwide.
•The potential impact of ATP funded projects is therefore substantial. Benefits extend worldwide and into many different disciplines, including homeland security and biodefense applications.
National Institute of Standards and Technology • Technology Administration • U.S. Department of Commerce
Misc.27%
Design12%
Control6%
Assembly8%
Tools1%
Forming27%
Inspection8%
Machining11%
ATP Manufacturing Support
(as a Percentage of $224M)