[email protected] @lkuceo
Presenter:David J. Anderson
CEO Lean Kanban Inc.
Lean Kanban NetherlandsUtrecht
October 2013Release 1.0
Lessons we can learn from Bruce Lee’s journey in martial arts
Kanbanand Evolutionary Management
[email protected] @lkuceo
The End of Methodology
[email protected] @lkuceo
Is Kanban heralding in a new era?
* http://alistair.cockburn.us/The+end+of+methodology** Cockburn’s suggested name for this new class of methods
It’s the end of methodology!*
Reflective Improvement Frameworks** are the
future!
Alistair Cockburn
Kanban is such a Reflective Improvement Framework
[email protected] @lkuceo
A methodology defines behavior
• A software engineering methodology is a description of techniques– what to do– how to do it– When to do it - sequences or workflows– Who does what - definition of roles and
responsibilities• Ideally, a methodology should tell us why and
give us a context to define its appropriateness
[email protected] @lkuceo
Many styles of software engineering emerged over several decades
• Some just personal preferences in style (e.g. PSP versus XP), but others for specific contexts or risk profiles (e.g. the many risk profiles captured in a 2-dimensional grid in Cockburn's Crystal methods).
• Some styles came in schools or movements - such as the Agile movement
• While others came as large frameworks such as Rational Unified Process designed to be tailored to a context
[email protected] @lkuceo
Motivation for the Kanban Method
[email protected] @lkuceo
The Kanban Method was born out of frustration with these many styles
In 2002, I was questioning whether the specific methodology really
made that much differenceThe question wasn't whether a methodology worked or
not, or whether appropriateness of context had been assessed correctly or not, the problem was organizations were being seduced into pursuing changes that were too large and too ambitious. These change initiatives were beyond their capability and maturity to manage them
[email protected] @lkuceo
Managing change has greater leverage than picking the right methodology
Instead the bigger challenge with the greater leverage on outcome was learning to manage
change in the organization
I came to the conclusion (circa 2002) that the important issue in creative knowledge work wasn't the selection of the right methodology
[email protected] @lkuceo
Traditional Change is an A to B process
• A is where you are now. B is a destination.– B is either defined (from a methodology definition)– or designed (by tailoring a framework or using a model
based approach such as VSM* or TOC TP**)• To get from A to B, a change agency*** will guide a
transition initiative to install B into the organization
***either an internal process group or external consultants
CurrentProcess Future
Process
Defined
Designed
transition
* Value stream mapping, ** Theory of Constraints Thinking Processes
[email protected] @lkuceo
Change initiatives fail (even) more often than projects
Change initiatives often fail (aborted) or produce lack luster results
They fail to institutionalize resulting in regression back to old behavior
[email protected] @lkuceo
Daniel Kahneman has given us a simple model for how we process information
Daniel Kahneman
System 1Sensory PerceptionPattern Matching
System 2Logical Inference
Engine
Learning byExperience
Learning from theory
FASTBut slow to learn
SLOWBut fast to learn
[email protected] @lkuceo
How we process change…
Daniel Kahneman
Silicon-basedlife form
Carbon-basedlife form
I logically evaluate change using System 2
I adapt quickly
I feel change emotionally using System 1
I adapt slowly
[email protected] @lkuceo
Changing methodologies challenges people psychology & sociologically
• New roles (defined in a methodology) attack their identity• New responsibilities using new techniques & practices
threaten their self-esteem and put their social status at risk
• Most people resist most change because individually they have more to lose than to gain
• It is safer to be conservative and stick to current practices and avoid shaking up the current social hierarchy
• Only the brave, the reckless or the desperate will pursue grand changes
[email protected] @lkuceo
The Kanban Method…• Rejects the traditional
approach to change • Believes, it is better to avoid
resistance than to push harder against it – Don’t install a new methodology
• Is designed for carbon-based life forms - Evolutionary change that is humane
[email protected] @lkuceo
The Kanban Method…• Catalyzes improvement
through use of kanban systems and visual boards*
• Takes its name from the use of kanban but it is just a name
• Anyone who thinks Kanban is just about kanban (boards & systems) is truly mistaken
*also known as "kanban" in Chinese and in Japanese when written with Chinese characters
[email protected] @lkuceo
The Kanban Method is a new approach to improvement
Kanban is a
method
without methodology
[email protected] @lkuceo
Bruce Lee’s Journey in Martial Arts
[email protected] @lkuceo
Bruce Lee rejected traditional teaching and styles of Chinese martial arts
• There are some parallels in the story of Bruce Lee and the emergence of his approach to Kung Fu
• Lee rejected the idea of following a particular style of Chinese Martial Arts
[email protected] @lkuceo
Snake
Monkey
Mantis
Tiger
Kung Fu Panda simplified the art to only four styles
[email protected] @lkuceo
There are in fact very many styles…
[email protected] @lkuceo
“Dry land swimming” provides a false sense of capability
• The only way to learn is to train with a live opponent
• Lee rejected the many styles of martial arts for various reasons, mainly that they gave the practitioners a false sense of capability, putting them at risk in real combat situations
• He was against Kata (learning patterns without an opponent) and described them in derogatory terms such as "dry land swimming.“
[email protected] @lkuceo
Lee wanted to start from first principles and core concepts
Four ranges of combat• Kicking• Punching• Trapping• Grappling
*Apparently still called the Five Ways, there are actually now six **with the later inclusion of SAA**The fact that The Five Ways has six elements is evidence of evolution in action***Incorporated core ideas such as "center line" and single fluid motion from Wing Chun and parrying from Epee Fencing********Not a Chinese Martial Art and hence evidence of "no limitation as limitation"
Five* Ways of Attack***• Single Direct Attack (SDA)• Attack By Combination (ABC)• Progressive Indirect Attack
(PIA)• (Hand) Immobilization Attack
(HIA)• Attack by Drawing (ABD)• Single Angle Attack (SAA)
[email protected] @lkuceo
Lee’s approach still needed a name
• He named his approachJeet Kune Do - the way of the intercepting fist - after one of the practices taught in his method
• He was quick to point out that it was just a name, a way of communicating a set of ideas. He was passionate that practitioners shouldn't get hung up on the name or the inclusion of any one move or action.
[email protected] @lkuceo
Jeet Kune Do encourages development of a uniquely personal style
• a framework from which to pick & develop a personal style
• an evolutionary approach where adoption of maneuvers is learned & reinforced by training with an opponent
• Nothing was sacred
"absorb that which is useful“
discard the remainder
[email protected] @lkuceo
Training with an opponent provides the core feedback loop to drive adaptation
Lee pursued ever more elaborate approaches to protected real combat training to enable the closed loop learning that was core to the evolutionary nature of JKD
[email protected] @lkuceo
Kata are not adaptive
In comparison with JKD, patterned styles of martial arts taught with "kata" were open loop and not adaptive. There is no learning from practicing kata
[email protected] @lkuceo
Water flows around the rock
“be like water”
the rock represents resistance
[email protected] @lkuceo
The Kanban Method
[email protected] @lkuceo
Kanban should be like water*
In change management, resistance is from the people involvedand it is always emotional (system 1)
To flow around the rock, we must learn how to avoid emotional resistance
* http://joecampbell.wordpress.com/2009/05/13/be-like-water/
[email protected] @lkuceo
Principles of the Kanban Method
• Start with what you do now• Agree to pursue evolutionary change• Initially, respect roles, responsibilities and job
titles• Encourage acts of leadership at all levels
The first 3 principles were specifically chosen to address System 1 objections, to flow around the rock of emotional resistance in humans
[email protected] @lkuceo
Kanban’s Core Enabling Concepts
Kanban is based on some simple concepts for managing creative knowledge work• Service-orientation • Service delivery involves workflow• Creative work flows through a series of information
discovery activities
Kanban would be less applicable if a service-orientated view of work were difficult to conceive or the work was without a definable workflow
[email protected] @lkuceo
6 Practices Enable Process Evolution
The Kanban Method
VisualizeLimit Work-in-progressManage FlowMake Policies ExplicitImplement Feedback LoopsImprove Collaboratively, Evolve Experimentally
(using models & the scientific method)
[email protected] @lkuceo
Start with what you do now
• The Kanban Method evolved with the principle that it “should be like water” - enable change while avoiding sources of resistance
• With Kanban you start with what you do now, and "kanbanize" it, catalyzing the evolutionary process into action. Changes to processes in use will occur
• Evaluating whether a change is truly an improvement is done using fitness criteria that evaluate an external outcome
[email protected] @lkuceo
Fitness Criteria
[email protected] @lkuceo
Fitness criteria are metrics that measure observable external outcomes
• Fitness criteria are metrics that measure things customers or other external stakeholders value– Delivery time– Quality– Predictability– Safety (conformance to regulatory
requirements)• or metrics that value actual
outcomes such as– customer satisfaction– employee satisfaction
[email protected] @lkuceo
Net Promoter Score is a Fitness Evaluator but is it the only metric we need?
• Steve Denning has proposedthat Net Promoter Score(NPS) is the only metric thatbusiness should care about
• NPS is interesting becauseit is a fitness evaluator. Itwill indicate whether a business (or product) is likely to survive & thrive
• But is it the only metric we need?
Steve Denning
[email protected] @lkuceo
Net Promoter Score is a way of evaluating customer satisfaction
• In a general sense and at an abstract level NPS tells us whether customers like what we offer but we cannot know what they truly care about
• For the abstract problem of, “Can we measure customer satisfaction?” NPV is a reasonably good measure, if used properly
[email protected] @lkuceo
The problem with Net Promoter Score is that it doesn’t tell you what to do!
• Net Promoter Score (if used properly) will tell you whether your product or service is likely to continue selling
• However, it doesn’t give you any clues about what to do or how to improve
• If NPS is your only metric you’re left to randomly experiment to generate a higher score
• Like biological evolution, random mutation is expensive, takes a long time & involves luck
[email protected] @lkuceo
Can we be smarter by using better fitness criteria than NPS?
• If we have a service-oriented view of the world, and want to evaluate service delivery then we already know what customers care about– Lead time– Quality– Predictability– Safety (or conformance to regulatory reqs)
[email protected] @lkuceo
If we order a pizza we know what we care about…
• Fast delivery– lead time from order to
delivery• Accuracy and quality– Pepperoni not Hawaiian– Still warm on delivery
• Predictable Delivery– If they say “ready in 30
minutes”, we want delivery in 25-35 minutes
[email protected] @lkuceo
If we need a medical procedure…
• Short waiting time– Queuing time from diagnosis to procedure
• Short procedure & recovery time– Fast procedure, fast recovery time, implies minimally invasive
surgery and use of technology to reduce the craft input and eliminate variability
• Predictability of schedule & outcome– Procedure should proceed as scheduled– Outcome should have high probability of success
• Safe– Low risk of complications– Regulatory health & safety procedures followed
[email protected] @lkuceo
Validate Fitness Criteria with real customers
• It is necessary to keep checking that the fitness criteria we are measuring do indeed matter to customers.
• Variation in what matters provide the opportunity to segment demand and offer different classes of service within your kanban system
• Will you pay extra to have your pizza delivered faster?
[email protected] @lkuceo
Which system is fitter?
We don’t know!
System B is faster but without understanding customer expectations, both may be fit enough
5 10 15 20 25 30 40 45 55 65 More02468
101214
System A
Frequency
Lead Time (Days)
5 10 15 20 25 30 More0
5
10
15
20
25
30
System B
Frequency
Lead Time in Days
Mean 17 days Mean 12 days
[email protected] @lkuceo
Measuring delivery against expectation
5 10 15 20 25 30 40 45 55 65 More02468
101214
System A
Frequency
Lead Time (Days)
-25 -20 -5 0 5 10 20 30 35 40 More0
2
4
6
8
10
12
System A
Frequency
Lead Time Expectation Spread (Days)
5 10 15 20 25 30 More0
5
10
15
20
25
30
System B
Frequency
Lead Time in Days
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 More05
1015202530354045
System B
Frequency
Lead Time Expectation Spread (Days)
Mean 17 days Mean 12 days
System B is clearly fitter!
System B delivers 5/7 within expectationsSystem A only delivers 3/7 within expectations
[email protected] @lkuceo
Business Risks, Fitness Criteria & Classes of Service should all align
• If your kanban system is designed properly the classes of service you are offering should align with the true business risks in the domain
• And the metrics being used to evaluate system capability, should be fitness criteria that are derived from the business risk being managed
• For example, cost of delay requires us to measure lead time
[email protected] @lkuceo
Assessing fitness to pursue ashort Shelf-Life strategy
Short(days, weeks,
months)
Medium(months,quarters,1-2 years)
Long(years,
decades)
Lead T
ime
Short
Long
Deliv
ery
Business Agility
Reple
nis
hm
en
t
Frequent
Seldom
Frequent
Seldom
Pre
dic
tabili
ty
High
Low
Are our business agility &
predictability fit enough for our
strategy?
Kanban system dynamics
If we plan to pursue short shelf-life opportunities, we must measure predictability, lead time, replenishment & delivery frequency as fitness criteria. Expectations are set based on our chosen strategy to pursue short
shelf-life opportunities
[email protected] @lkuceo
Enabling Evolutionary Management
[email protected] @lkuceo
Institutionalize feedback systems to enable evolutionary change
OperationsReview
SystemCapability
Review
StandupMeeting
manager to subordinate(s) (both 1-1 and 1-team)
[email protected] @lkuceo
Disintermediate!Risks, fitness criteria & classes of service
should be explicit & transparent
OperationsReview
SystemCapability
Review
StandupMeeting
manager to subordinate(s) (both 1-1 and 1-team)
Expose risk, classes of service & fitness criteria
at all 3 levels of feedback
Lead timeQualityPredictability
Lead timeQualityPredictability
Lead timeQualityPredictability
[email protected] @lkuceo
ComparingKanban with Jeet Kune Do
[email protected] @lkuceo
Jeet Kune Do is a framework for fighting
JKD contains a martial art framework. It contains a core set of principles based on an underlying theory of fighting and vulnerability of the human body: concepts such as "center line" from Wing Chun, for example.
Center line
[email protected] @lkuceo
Kanban is a framework for service-delivery management
• Kanban is a management method. It directly addresses service delivery and evolutionary change (management)
• It creates a mechanism for framing operational decisions such as – Risk (or Value) trumps Flow, Flow trumps Waste
Elimination– Use of pull systems and the consequent concept
of deferred commitment (real option theory)
[email protected] @lkuceo
Kanban may be analogous to JKD for Service Delivery Management
• Kanban provides a management framework for evolving uniquely tailored workflows for improved service delivery
• Kanban embraces the idea of “using no way as way” – evolving your own style of service delivery
• Kanban embraces the idea of “no limitation as limitation” by encouraging the use of models from many domains to improve workflows and service-delivery
[email protected] @lkuceo
More Evolutionary Management
[email protected] @lkuceo
The Kanban Method makes a business fitter for purpose
• The Kanban Method enables a business to improve its service delivery so that it is fitter for purpose and more likely to survive & thrive
• The Kanban Method enables an adaptive capability within the organization so that it can adapt to changing demands and other risks in the external environment
[email protected] @lkuceo
Lean Startup is another evolutionary approach
• Lean Startup focuses on validating assumptions about the fitness for purpose of a product or service offering
• It does this by “engaging the enemy” directly using techniques to create “safe-to-fail” experiments
• For example, “Fake a Feature”
Build-Measure-LearnCycle
[email protected] @lkuceo
Lean Startup makes a product or service fitter for purpose
• By use of techniques that validate assumptions early and quickly, Lean Startup enables a product or service offering to evolve quickly
• In doing so the product or service becomes fitter for purpose and is more likely to survive and thrive
[email protected] @lkuceo
Like Kanban, Lean Startup is a Pragmatic approach
• Lean Startup suggests that you don’t speculate about the future behavior of people, rather you set up experimental situations and observe what they actually do
• In this respect, Lean Startup is like behavioral economics applied to product or service design
• Like Lee’s philosophy in JKD, it engages the opponent (uncertainty) directly
[email protected] @lkuceo
Businesses need to do both – be adaptable and adapt their products
• Adaptive capability enables a business to insure it is doing things right and continuing to do them well in the face of a changing external environment
• Adaptive product or service design enables a business to insure it is doing the right thing and continuing to offer the right things to a fickle and evolving market
[email protected] @lkuceo
Together Kanban & Lean Startup bring the philosophy of JKD to modern
creative knowledge work industries
• Don’t adopt a methodology or patterned style• Engage the opponent (uncertainty & risk)
directly in a safe environment• Learn from fast feedback• Adapt a unique product, service or method of
service delivery that is fitter-for-purpose
[email protected] @lkuceo
Conclusion
[email protected] @lkuceo
The future of creative knowledge work should be inspired by Bruce Lee & JKD
Our opponents are uncertainty & risk. Engage directlyVisualize & make them explicit throughout the workflow & at all 3 levels of reportingTeach beginners to set up safe-to-fail, learning environments at the individual, workflow & business unit levelsEvolutionary methods are required to help us manage in complex environmentsIf humans are involved the environment is complexFitness-for-purpose & sustainability come from developing strong adaptive capability
Train with live opponentsNo kata
No "dry land swimming“
[email protected] @lkuceo
Thank you!
[email protected] @lkuceo
David Anderson is a thought leader in managing creative knowledge workers. He leads a consulting, training, publishing and event planning business dedicated to developing, promoting and implementing sustainable evolutionary approaches for management in 21st Century industries.He has 30 years experience in the high technology industry starting with computer games in the early 1980’s. He has led software teams delivering superior productivity and quality using innovative methods at large companies such as Sprint and Motorola.
David is the pioneer of the Kanban Method an evolutionary approach to change and improved service delivery & business agility. His latest book is, Lessons in Agile Management – On the Road to Kanban.
David is a founder of the Lean Kanban University, a trade association dedicated to assuring quality Kanban training through a worldwide network of accredited trainers and defined, peer reviewed curriculum.
About
[email protected] @lkuceo
Joe Campbell first blogged about the similarity in philosophy between the Kanban Method and the teachings of Bruce Lee. He coined the phrase “Kanban should be like water”.
The data on slides 45 & 46 was provided by Raymond Keating of CME Group.
This presentation was inspired by Alistair Cockburn’s blog post “The End of Methodology”. My approach to change was influenced by an observation from Peter Senge, “People do not resist change, they resist being changed!” “Safe-to-fail Experiment” is a term used by Dave Snowden in his Cynefin framework. Steve Denning proposed NPS as the only metric that matters in his book, “Radical Management.”
Acknowledgements
[email protected] @lkuceo