SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report Page III-1
III. CORRECTIONS AND ADDITIONS TO THE DRAFT EIR
DRAFT EIR
I. INTRODUCTION/SUMMARY
In response to Comment No. 2.1 on the Draft EIR, the following mitigation measure is added to Table I-1, Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures, of the Draft EIR (page I-15):
(D-4) Prior to demolition of the existing East Building, environmental concerns related to organochlorine pesticides from termiticides shall be investigated and, if necessary, mitigated, in accordance with Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC) Interim Guidance, Evaluation of School Sites with Potential Soil Contamination as a Result of Lead From Lead-Based Paint, Organochlorine Pesticides from Termiticides, and Polychlorinated Biphenyls from Electrical Transformers, dated June 9, 2006.
The addition of this mitigation measure to Section I corresponds with the addition of this mitigation measure to Section IV.D of the Draft EIR. Incorporation of this added mitigation measure does not materially change any findings or conclusions contained within the Draft EIR.
In response to Comment Nos. 5.17 and 31.4 on the Draft EIR, the following revisions are made to Mitigation Measure G-4 in Table I-1, Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures, of the Draft EIR (page I-20):
(G-4) Two weeks prior to the commencement of demolition and construction at the Bundy Campus, notification shall be provided to the Santa Monica Airport administration, off-site residential uses located alongto the southern boundary of the Bundy Campus, the Mar Vista Community Council, as well as on-site posting within the Bundy Campus, disclosing the construction schedule, including the various types of activities that would be occurring throughout the duration of the construction period.
The revisions to this mitigation measure reflect the revisions to this mitigation measure in Section IV.G of the Draft EIR and do not materially change any findings or conclusions contained within the Draft EIR.
The following inadvertent error was identified in the “Level of Significance after Mitigation” for the Transportation and Traffic mitigation measures in Table I-1, Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures, of the Draft EIR (page I-25) and is corrected as follows:
“The Master Plan’s impacts would be less-than-significant with respect to the regional transportation system, parking, impacts at 21 of the 27 intersections studied, and impacts at 20 of the 23 22 street segments studied.”
Santa Monica Community College January 26, 2007
SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report Page III-2
The correction to this text in Table I-1 does not materially change any findings or conclusions in the Draft EIR.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
In response to Comment No. 5.2 on the Draft EIR, Figure II-2 has been revised to reflect the correct location of Santa Monica Boulevard and the Emeritus College. The revised Figure II-2 is included on page III-3 of this Section.
In response to Comment No. 5.3, the text “via Donald Douglas Loop South” on pages II-8, II-9, and II-10 has been corrected to read “at Donald Douglas Loop South,” as shown below:
1. Spitfire Grill Driveway. Once access is secured to Airport Avenue via at Donald Douglas Loop South, this historical access point to Airport Avenue, located at the Bundy Campus’ northern edge between the Spitfire Grill and the 3200 Airport Avenue Building, would not be used on a regular basis.
2. 3400 Airport Avenue Building Driveway. Once access is secured to Airport Avenue via at Donald Douglas Loop South, this historical access point to Airport Avenue, located at the Bundy Campus’ northern edge between the 3400 Airport Avenue Building and Bundy Drive, would not be used on a regular basis.
5. Donald Douglas Loop South. SMC intends to secure access from the Bundy Campus to Airport Avenue via at Donald Douglas Loop South, located along the Bundy Campus’ northern edge, west of the 3200 Airport Avenue Building. Beginning in January 2006, right-turn egress-only from the Bundy Campus has been provided via a newly resurfaced and re-striped driveway at this location.
In addition, the same text in the third sentence on page II-10 has been corrected as follows:
“As discussed above, the Spitfire Grill Driveway (access point 1) and the 3400 Airport Avenue Building Driveway (access point 2) would not be used on a regular basis once access is secured to Airport Avenue via at Donald Douglas Loop South.”
These corrections do not change any findings or conclusions contained within the Draft EIR.
III. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
In response to Comment No. 5.3, the text in the last sentence of the second full paragraph on page III-13 has been corrected as shown below:
“In January 2006, with the opening of the driveway to Airport Avenue by way of at Donald Douglas Loop South, parking on the Bundy Campus was made available to all students and staff.”
Wilshire
Boulev
ard
22
1
34
5
7
6
8
Source: (Image) Sandborn copywrite 2005 , TeleAtlas copywrite 2005, and GoogleEarth copywrite 2005; (Figure) Christopher A. Joseph & Associates, January 2006; amended January 2007.
1010405405
1. Emeritus College2. Madison Campus
3. Santa Monica College Main Campus4. Vacant Lot at 14th & Pico Boulevard
5. Academy of Entertainment and Technology6. Administration
7. Airport Arts Campus8. Bundy Campus (Project Site)
Approximate Scale (Miles)
0.5 0.750.25 1.00.0
Legend: SMC Campus Facilities
1
Bundy Campus(Project Site)
Figure II-2Project Location Map
Santa Monica Community College January 26, 2007
SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report Page III-4
In response to Comment Nos. 7.12, 8.4, 23.3, 26.1, 26.14, 26.17, and 28.1, the fifth page of Table III-1 (i.e., page III-20 of the Draft EIR) has been edited to delete the words “removal of shuttle lot N/A” under the description for Related Project No. 113.
In addition, in response to Comment Nos. 5.25 and 5.37, two new related projects, Related Project Nos. 118 and 119, have been added to Table III-1.
As edited, the referenced portions of Table III-1 read as follows:
city park (acre) 4 dog park (acre) 1
recreation field (acre) 1 113 Airport Park Expansion
removal of shuttle lot NA
Donald Douglas Loop to north, Airport Avenue to south,
Bundy Drive to east
Santa Monica
118 Madison Campus New theater (sf) 32,000 11th Street and Arizona Avenue Santa Monica
119 Big Blue Bus – New Bus Line public transit bus line N/A
Westwood/Pico to 1900 Pico Boulevard via
Palms and Mar Vista Santa Monica
In addition, Figure III-9 has been revised to reflect the addition of Related Project Nos. 118 and 119. The revised Figure III-9 is included on the following page of this Section.
The correction to the description of Related Project No. 113 and the addition of Related Project Nos. 118 and 119 do not change any findings or conclusions contained within the Draft EIR.
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
A. Impacts Found to be Less Than Significant
No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR were required.
B. Aesthetics
No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR were required.
C. Air Quality
No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR were required.
Related Project Location
565857 59
8862
605348
4643
39
444240
71212219
1718
11
95 116
96 105
2332337024
256927
30
54
64
66
11449 77
8575
76475051
87 78
107
106104 84
109979998 86
108 10010 129
11
115
16 89
68
2041
8131 8283
112
343536
743773
2629
28
45
103
52 55 6165
63 9380
110
79
67
14
8
38
9294
117
907291
7
13
101102
15 12 34
56
San Vice
nte Blvd
Wilshire
BlvdSanta Monica Blvd
Lincoln Blvd
Pico Blvd
Ocean Park Blvd
Rose Ave
Venice Blvd
Centinela AveBundy Dr
Olympic Blvd
National Blvd
Jefferson Blvd
Culve
r Blvd
Neilson Way
Washington Blvd
Montana Ave
118
119
Figure III-9Related Projects Location Map
Source: Kaku Associates and Christopher A. Joseph & Associates, June 2006; amended January 2007.
Feet
0 5,6002,800 4,2001,400
Legend
#
PROJECT SITE
Related Project Location
113
Pacific Ocean
Airport Ave
Santa Monica Community College January 26, 2007
SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report Page III-6
D. Hazards and Hazardous Materials
In response to Comment No. 2.1 on the Draft EIR, the following mitigation measure is added to the Draft EIR:
(D-4) Prior to demolition of the existing East Building, environmental concerns related to organochlorine pesticides from termiticides shall be investigated and, if necessary, mitigated, in accordance with Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC) Interim Guidance, Evaluation of School Sites with Potential Soil Contamination as a Result of Lead From Lead-Based Paint, Organochlorine Pesticides from Termiticides, and Polychlorinated Biphenyls from Electrical Transformers, dated June 9, 2006.
The addition of this mitigation measure provides further assurance that the construction activities will be conducted in a manner that protects the health and safety of the public. Incorporation of this added mitigation measure does not materially change any findings or conclusions contained within the Draft EIR.
E. Hydrology and Water Quality
No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR were required.
F. Land Use and Zoning
No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR were required.
G. Noise
In response to Comment Nos. 5.17 and 31.4 on the Draft EIR, the following revisions are made to Mitigation Measure G-4 in the Draft EIR:
(G-4) Two weeks prior to the commencement of demolition and construction at the Bundy Campus, notification shall be provided to the Santa Monica Airport administration, off-site residential uses located alongto the southern boundary of the Bundy Campus, the Mar Vista Community Council, as well as on-site posting within the Bundy Campus, disclosing the construction schedule, including the various types of activities that would be occurring throughout the duration of the construction period.
The revisions to this mitigation measure expand the scope of notice and do not materially change any findings or conclusions contained within the Draft EIR.
H. Public Utilities
No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR were required.
Santa Monica Community College January 26, 2007
SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report Page III-7
I. Public Services
No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR were required.
J. Traffic/Transportation/Parking
In response to Comment No. 5.3, the text “Airport Avenue via Donald Douglas Loop South” in Table IV.J-13, Master Plan Access Alternatives, has been corrected to read “Airport Avenue via at Donald Douglas Loop South” (page IV.J-23). The following addition is also made to the third sentence in Mitigation Measure J-2 (page IV.J-46):
(J-2) 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue and Airport Avenue (Study Intersection 15) – The most constrained movement at this intersection is the westbound right-turn (operating at Level of Service (LOS) F in the a.m. peak hour and LOS C in the p.m. peak hour). The impact at this location is significant only in the a.m. peak hour, when the addition of Master Plan traffic there would result in a significant increase in delay. Therefore the mitigation measure that has been identified to address the impact at this location is to prohibit left turns out from the Bundy Campus at Donald Douglas Loop South onto Airport Avenue during the a.m. peak period (between 7:00 and 9:00 a.m.). This operational measure would reduce the amount of Master Plan traffic to this movement and would effectively mitigate the Master Plan impact that would occur under Access Alternatives A1, A5, A6, A9, A10, B1, B2, B4, and C2.
In response to Comment No. 26.11, 26.16, and 28.3, the first sentence on page IV.J-41 of the Draft EIR has been corrected to read as follows:
“The segment of Airport Avenue westeast of Centinela Avenue is treated as a collector street in this study, which is consistent with previous studies for other projects in the area.”
In response to Comment No. 28.3, the following paragraph on page IV.J-47 of the Draft EIR has been corrected to read as follows:
“23rd Street North of Airport Avenue (Street Segment 13) — The significant street segment impact identified for 23rd Street north of Airport Avenue occurs on a street that is part of a travel corridor that provides the only channel for north-south through traffic between Centinela Avenue and Lincoln Boulevard. As such, this segment of 23rd Street, while classified as a collector street, carries in excess of 25,000 vehicles per day. That traffic volume, as well as the physical characteristics of the street itself (i.e., its grade), is such that typical neighborhood traffic calming measures — such as those applied on Rose Avenue westeast of Bundy Drive and on 23rd Street north of Ocean Park Boulevard (stop signs and speed humps) — are not considered appropriate. The alternative that might be used on collector streets with relatively high volumes would be “speed tables,” essentially raised areas that are lower, longer and wider than speed humps. However, the installation of speed tables is not considered feasible on this segment of 23rd Street, given the grade of 23rd Street at this location, the fact that the City of Santa Monica Residential Traffic Management policy discourages measures that reroute trips from one local
Santa Monica Community College January 26, 2007
SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report Page III-8
street to another, and the City of Santa Monica’s policy to keep streets designated by the Fire Department as “Emergency Response Routes” free from design features that would slow fire trucks.”
These corrections do not change any findings or conclusions contained within the Draft EIR.
K. Neighborhood Effects
No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR were required.
V. GENERAL IMPACT CATEGORIES
No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR were required.
VI. ALTERNATIVES TO THE MASTER PLAN
No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR were required.
VII. PREPARERS OF THE EIR AND PERSONS CONSULTED
No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR were required.
VIII. REFERENCES AND ACRONYMS
No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR were required.
TECHNICAL APPENDICES TO THE DRAFT EIR
APPENDIX A: NOP AND INITIAL STUDY
No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR Technical Appendices were required.
APPENDIX B: RESPONSES TO THE NOP
No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR Technical Appendices were required.
APPENDIX C: AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS
No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR Technical Appendices were required.
APPENDIX D: PHASE I/II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT, SOIL AND GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENTS, AND GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR Technical Appendices were required.
Santa Monica Community College January 26, 2007
SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report Page III-9
APPENDIX E: NOISE WORKSHEETS
No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR Technical Appendices were required.
APPENDIX F: LETTERS FROM PUBLIC SERVICE AND UTILITY AGENCIES AND CUMULATIVE UTILITY GENERATION TABLES
No additions or corrections to this Section of the Draft EIR Technical Appendices were required.
APPENDIX G: TRAFFIC STUDY
In response to Comment No. 6.12, the “Cumulative Plus Project (Year 2010) City of Los Angeles Methodology with Mitigation” tables from the Traffic Study (pages 1077 through 1133 of Appendix G to the Draft EIR) have been re-included on the following pages of this Section.
This does not change any findings or conclusions contained within the Draft EIR.
Page III-10
Page III-11
Page III-12
Page III-13
Page III-14
Page III-15
Page III-16
Page III-17
Page III-18
Page III-19
Page III-20
Page III-21
Page III-22
Page III-23
Page III-24
Page III-25
Page III-26
Page III-27
Page III-28
Page III-29
Page III-30
Page III-31
Page III-32
Page III-33
Page III-34
Page III-35
Page III-36
Page III-37
Page III-38
Page III-39
Page III-40
Page III-41
Page III-42
Page III-43
Page III-44
Page III-45
Page III-46
Page III-47
Page III-48
Page III-49
Page III-50
Page III-51
Page III-52
Page III-53
Page III-54
Page III-55
Page III-56
Page III-57
Page III-58
Page III-59
Page III-60
Page III-61
Page III-62
Page III-63
Page III-64
Page III-65
Page III-66
Santa Monica Community College January 26, 2007
SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report Page III-67
In response to Comment No. 6.13 regarding planned improvements to the intersection of Inglewood Boulevard and Venice Boulevard, projected future levels of service for this intersection were recalculated with the identified improvements in place. The results of this recalculation are included on the following pages of this Section.
This recalculation does not change any findings or conclusions contained within the Draft EIR.
City of Los Angeles Methodology
Peak V/C Significant V/C Residual
Intersection Hour LOS LOS Change Impact? LOS Change Impact?
*4 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.000 No
Pico Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No
*5 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.001 No
I-10 Freeway EB on-ramp PM D D 0.022 Yes
*9 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.031 Yes
Ocean Park Boulevard PM F F 0.039 Yes
*10 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.008 No
National Boulevard PM E E 0.022 Yes
*11 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM E E 0.001 No
National Boulevard PM F F 0.002 No
*12 I-405 Freeway SB On-Ramp & AM A A 0.000 No
National Boulevard PM A A 0.001 No
*13 I-405 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & AM A B 0.088 No
National Boulevard PM A A 0.067 No
*14 Sepulveda Boulevard & AM F F 0.000 No
National Boulevard PM F F 0.001 No
15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM F F
Airport Avenue [a] PM C C
AM 0.011 Yes 0.009 No
PM 0.001 No 0.001 No
*17 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.012 No C -0.036 No
Airport Avenue PM D D 0.037 Yes D 0.030 Yes
18 Bundy Drive & AM F
Project Driveway PM F
signalized AM D 0.007 No C -0.066 No
signalized PM E 0.041 Yes D -0.105 No
*19 Walgrove Avenue & AM F F 0.005 No
Rose Avenue PM F F 0.005 No
*20 Centinela Avenue & AM C C -0.001 No
Rose Avenue PM E E -0.003 No
*21 Walgrove Avenue & AM A A 0.003 No
Palms Boulevard PM C C 0.003 No
*22 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.007 No
Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No
*23 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM F F 0.001 No
Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.003 No
*24 Walgrove Avenue & AM E E 0.003 No
Venice Boulevard PM E E 0.003 No
*25 Beethoven Street & AM D D 0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM C C 0.001 No
*26 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F 0.000 No
*27 Inglewood Boulevard & AM D D -0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No
Inglewood Boulevard & AM C C -0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No
City of Santa Monica Methodology
Peak Delay or V/C Significant Delay or V/C Residual
Intersection Hour Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Impact? Delay V/C LOS Change Impact?
1 20th Street & AM 19 0.657 B 19 0.657 B 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 20 0.682 B 20 0.683 B 0 No
2 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 26 0.802 C 26 0.802 C 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 22 0.653 C 22 0.653 C 0 No
3 I-10 EB Off-Ramp/34th Street & AM 15 0.631 B 15 0.633 B 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 11 0.587 B 11 0.589 B 0 No
6 20th Street & AM 4 0.427 A 4 0.425 A 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM 18 0.702 B 18 0.701 B 0 No
7 23rd Street & AM 48 1.083 D 49 1.084 D 1 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM ** 1.374 F ** 1.368 F -0.006 No
8 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 5 0.479 A 5 0.479 A 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM 9 0.613 A 9 0.613 A 0 No
15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM ** N/C F ** N/C F N/C Yes ** N/C F N/C No
Airport Avenue [b] PM 17 N/C C 17 N/C C 0 No 17 N/C C 0 No
16 Donald Douglas Loop South & AM 9 0.316 A 9 0.380 A 0 No
Airport Avenue [c] PM 8 0.259 A 9 0.300 A 1 No
17 Bundy Drive & AM 6 0.765 A 6 0.777 A 0 No 4 0.720 A -2 No
Airport Avenue PM 4 0.759 A 5 0.792 A 1 No 4 0.762 A 0 No
Notes:
* Intersection is currently operating under ATSAC system.
** Indicates oversaturated conditions. Delay cannot be calculated.
[a] Intersection is controlled by stop sign(s). The top rows show analysis using Highway Capacity Manual stop-controlled methodology, for the purpose of evaluating the
operating condition of the intersection. Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio. The bottom rows show analysis using the CMA
methodology, for the purpose of application of the City of Los Angeles significance criteria. V/C ratio is reported.
[b] Intersection is two-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the most constrained approach.
[c] Intersection is all-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle.
TABLE 11
FUTURE (2010) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - ALTERNATIVE A1
Cumulative Base
Cumulative plus
Project
Cum+ Project with
Mitigations
Cumulative Base
Cumulative plus
Project
Cum+Project with
Mitigations
1.229 1.227
0.717 0.716
1.321 1.321
1.091 1.091
1.100 1.103
0.775 0.776
0.908 0.911
0.926 0.929
0.897 0.898
1.079 1.084
1.099 1.100
0.744 0.747
1.033 1.040
0.932 0.929
0.592 0.595
1.396 1.401
0.788 0.787
0.950 0.991
1.376 1.381
**
0.826 0.833
17
0.823 0.835
0.855 0.892
1.201 1.212
1.297 1.298
1.090
1.034 1.035
** **
0.544
0.527 0.615
0.508 0.575
0.964
1.073 1.075
0.459 0.459
1.400
1.100 1.108
0.926 0.948
1.020
0.861 0.883
1.302 1.333
Delay or V/C
0.861 0.861
1.367 1.372
Delay or V/C
1.019
1.361
0.963
0.543
1.090
17
**
Delay or V/C
No Feasible Mitigation
No Feasible Mitigation
No Feasible Mitigation
0.787
0.885
1.210
1.298
0.760
0.845
0.867 0.866
1.229 1.227
Page III-68
City of Los Angeles Methodology
Peak V/C Significant V/C Residual
Intersection Hour LOS LOS Change Impact? LOS Change Impact?
*4 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.000 No
Pico Boulevard PM F F 0.009 No
*5 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.002 No
I-10 Freeway EB on-ramp PM D D 0.022 Yes
*9 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.031 Yes
Ocean Park Boulevard PM F F 0.039 Yes
*10 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.008 No
National Boulevard PM E E 0.023 Yes
*11 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM E E 0.001 No
National Boulevard PM F F 0.002 No
*12 I-405 Freeway SB On-Ramp & AM A A 0.000 No
National Boulevard PM A A 0.001 No
*13 I-405 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & AM A B 0.088 No
National Boulevard PM A A 0.067 No
*14 Sepulveda Boulevard & AM F F 0.000 No
National Boulevard PM F F 0.001 No
15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM F F
Airport Avenue [a] PM C C
AM 0.009 No
PM -0.002 No
*17 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.014 No C -0.036 No
Airport Avenue PM D D 0.039 Yes D 0.032 Yes
18 Bundy Drive & AM F
Project Driveway PM F
signalized AM D 0.008 No C -0.063 No
signalized PM E 0.045 Yes D -0.084 No
*19 Walgrove Avenue & AM F F 0.005 No
Rose Avenue PM F F 0.005 No
*20 Centinela Avenue & AM C C -0.001 No
Rose Avenue PM E E -0.003 No
*21 Walgrove Avenue & AM A A 0.003 No
Palms Boulevard PM C C 0.003 No
*22 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.007 No
Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No
*23 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM F F 0.001 No
Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.003 No
*24 Walgrove Avenue & AM E E 0.003 No
Venice Boulevard PM E E 0.003 No
*25 Beethoven Street & AM D D 0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM C C 0.001 No
*26 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.040 No
*27 Inglewood Boulevard & AM D D -0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No
Inglewood Boulevard & AM C C -0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No
City of Santa Monica Methodology
Peak Delay or V/C Significant Delay or V/C Residual
Intersection Hour Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Impact? Delay V/C LOS Change Impact?
1 20th Street & AM 19 0.657 B 19 0.657 B 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 20 0.682 B 20 0.683 B 0 No
2 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 26 0.802 C 26 0.802 C 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 22 0.653 C 22 0.654 C 0 No
3 I-10 EB Off-Ramp/34th Street & AM 15 0.631 B 15 0.634 B 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 11 0.587 B 11 0.589 B 0 No
6 20th Street & AM 4 0.427 A 4 0.425 A 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM 18 0.702 B 18 0.701 B 0 No
7 23rd Street & AM 48 1.083 D 48 1.083 D 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM ** 1.374 F ** 1.353 F -0.021 No
8 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 5 0.479 A 5 0.479 A 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM 9 0.613 A 9 0.613 A 0 No
15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM ** N/C F ** N/C F 0 No
Airport Avenue [b] PM 17 N/C C 17 N/C C 0 No
16 Donald Douglas Loop South & AM 9 0.316 A 9 0.380 A 0 No
Airport Avenue [c] PM 8 0.259 A 9 0.300 A 1 No
17 Bundy Drive & AM 6 0.765 A 6 0.778 A 0 No 4 0.719 A -2 No
Airport Avenue PM 4 0.759 A 5 0.792 A 1 No 4 0.762 A 0 No
Notes:
* Intersection is currently operating under ATSAC system.
** Indicates oversaturated conditions. Delay cannot be calculated.
[a] Intersection is controlled by stop sign(s). The top rows show analysis using Highway Capacity Manual stop-controlled methodology, for the purpose of evaluating the
operating condition of the intersection. Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio. The bottom rows show analysis using the CMA
methodology, for the purpose of application of the City of Los Angeles significance criteria. V/C ratio is reported.
[b] Intersection is two-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the most constrained approach.
[c] Intersection is all-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle.
Cumulative Base
Cumulative plus
Project
Cumulative plus
Project
Cumulative Base
Cumulative plus
Project
Cum+Project with
Mitigations
No Feasible Mitigation
Delay or V/C
1.019
1.361
Delay or V/C
0.861
0.861 0.883
0.861
1.367 1.376
1.021
1.108
1.302 1.333
0.964
1.073 1.075
0.963
0.9490.926
1.400
1.100
0.459
0.544
0.527 0.615
0.543
0.459
0.575
1.090
1.034 1.035
1.090
0.508
**
17
0.823 0.837
17
**
0.855 0.894
1.201 1.210
1.297 1.295
**
0.826 0.834
**
0.950 0.995
1.376 1.381
1.396 1.401
0.788 0.787
0.932 0.929
0.592 0.595
0.744 0.747
1.033 1.040
1.079 1.084
1.099 1.100
1.100 1.103
0.775 0.776
0.908 0.911
0.926 0.929
0.897 0.898
1.229 1.227
0.717 0.716
1.321 1.321
1.091 1.051
No Feasible Mitigation
No Feasible Mitigation
Delay or V/C
0.787
0.887
0.763
0.866
TABLE 12
FUTURE (2010) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - ALTERNATIVE A2
0.867 0.866
1.229 1.227
Page III-69
City of Los Angeles Methodology
Peak V/C Significant V/C Residual
Intersection Hour LOS LOS Change Impact? LOS Change Impact?
*4 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.000 No
Pico Boulevard PM F F 0.009 No
*5 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.002 No
I-10 Freeway EB on-ramp PM D D 0.022 Yes
*9 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.035 Yes
Ocean Park Boulevard PM F F 0.043 Yes
*10 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.008 No
National Boulevard PM E E 0.023 Yes
*11 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM E E 0.001 No
National Boulevard PM F F 0.002 No
*12 I-405 Freeway SB On-Ramp & AM A A 0.000 No
National Boulevard PM A A 0.001 No
*13 I-405 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & AM A B 0.088 No
National Boulevard PM A A 0.067 No
*14 Sepulveda Boulevard & AM F F 0.000 No
National Boulevard PM F F 0.001 No
15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM F F
Airport Avenue [a] PM C C
AM 0.001 No
PM -0.002 No
*17 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.014 No C -0.031 No
Airport Avenue PM D E 0.065 Yes E 0.061 Yes
18 Bundy Drive & AM F
Project Driveway PM F
signalized AM D 0.009 No C -0.073 No
signalized PM F 0.072 Yes D -0.105 No
*19 Walgrove Avenue & AM F F 0.005 No
Rose Avenue PM F F 0.005 No
*20 Centinela Avenue & AM C C -0.001 No
Rose Avenue PM E E -0.003 No
*21 Walgrove Avenue & AM A A 0.003 No
Palms Boulevard PM C C 0.003 No
*22 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.007 No
Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No
*23 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM F F 0.001 No
Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.003 No
*24 Walgrove Avenue & AM E E 0.003 No
Venice Boulevard PM E E 0.003 No
*25 Beethoven Street & AM D D 0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM C C 0.001 No
*26 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F 0.000 No
*27 Inglewood Boulevard & AM D D -0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No
Inglewood Boulevard & AM C C -0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No
City of Santa Monica Methodology
Peak Delay or V/C Significant Delay or V/C Residual
Intersection Hour Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Impact? Delay V/C LOS Change Impact?
1 20th Street & AM 19 0.657 B 19 0.657 B 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 20 0.682 B 20 0.683 B 0 No
2 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 26 0.802 C 26 0.802 C 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 22 0.653 C 22 0.654 C 0 No
3 I-10 EB Off-Ramp/34th Street & AM 15 0.631 B 15 0.634 B 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 11 0.587 B 11 0.593 B 0 No
6 20th Street & AM 4 0.427 A 4 0.425 A 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM 18 0.702 B 18 0.701 B 0 No
7 23rd Street & AM 48 1.083 D 48 1.083 D 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM ** 1.374 F ** 1.370 F -0.004 No
8 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 5 0.479 A 5 0.479 A 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM 9 0.613 A 9 0.613 A 0 No
15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM ** N/C F ** N/C F 0 No
Airport Avenue [b] PM 17 N/C C 17 N/C C 0 No
16 Donald Douglas Loop South & AM 9 0.316 A 9 0.322 A 0 No
Airport Avenue [c] PM 8 0.259 A 8 0.285 A 0 No
17 Bundy Drive & AM 6 0.765 A 6 0.779 A 0 No 4 0.722 A -2 No
Airport Avenue PM 4 0.759 A 5 0.814 A 1 No 4 0.784 A 0 No
Notes:
* Intersection is currently operating under ATSAC system.
** Indicates oversaturated conditions. Delay cannot be calculated.
[a] Intersection is controlled by stop sign(s). The top rows show analysis using Highway Capacity Manual stop-controlled methodology, for the purpose of evaluating the
operating condition of the intersection. Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio. The bottom rows show analysis using the CMA
methodology, for the purpose of application of the City of Los Angeles significance criteria. V/C ratio is reported.
[b] Intersection is two-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the most constrained approach.
[c] Intersection is all-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle.
TABLE 13
FUTURE (2010) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - ALTERNATIVE A3
No Feasible Mitigation
1.376
1.021
0.883
1.337
1.404
Cumulative Base
Cumulative plus
Project
1.108
0.949
0.964
1.075
0.459
0.544
Cumulative plus
Project
1.090
17
**
1.090
1.034 1.035
** **
17
Cumulative Base
Cumulative plus
Project
Cum+Project with
Mitigations
Delay or V/CDelay or V/C
0.861 0.861
1.367
1.019
1.361
0.963
0.543
1.302
1.100
1.073
0.861
0.926
0.459
0.527 0.615
0.508 0.575
0.823 0.837
0.855 0.920
1.201 1.202
1.297 1.295
**
0.826 0.835
0.950 1.022
1.376 1.381
1.396 1.401
0.788 0.787
0.932 0.929
0.592 0.595
0.744 0.747
1.033 1.040
1.229 1.227
1.100 1.103
0.775 0.776
0.908 0.911
0.926 0.929
0.717 0.716
1.321 1.321
1.091 1.091
0.867 0.866
1.229 1.227
0.897 0.898
Delay or V/C
1.079 1.084
1.099 1.100
0.792
0.916
0.753
0.845
No Feasible Mitigation
No Feasible Mitigation
Page III-70
City of Los Angeles Methodology
Peak V/C Significant V/C Residual
Intersection Hour LOS LOS Change Impact? LOS Change Impact?
*4 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.000 No
Pico Boulevard PM F F 0.009 No
*5 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.002 No
I-10 Freeway EB on-ramp PM D D 0.022 Yes
*9 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.035 Yes
Ocean Park Boulevard PM F F 0.043 Yes
*10 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.008 No
National Boulevard PM E E 0.023 Yes
*11 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM E E 0.001 No
National Boulevard PM F F 0.002 No
*12 I-405 Freeway SB On-Ramp & AM A A 0.000 No
National Boulevard PM A A 0.001 No
*13 I-405 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & AM A B 0.088 No
National Boulevard PM A A 0.067 No
*14 Sepulveda Boulevard & AM F F 0.000 No
National Boulevard PM F F 0.001 No
15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM F F
Airport Avenue [a] PM C C
AM 0.001 No
PM -0.002 No
*17 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.010 No C -0.031 No
Airport Avenue PM D E 0.057 Yes E 0.057 Yes
18 Bundy Drive & AM F
Project Driveway PM F
signalized AM D 0.018 No C -0.063 No
signalized PM F 0.091 Yes D -0.081 No
*19 Walgrove Avenue & AM F F 0.005 No
Rose Avenue PM F F 0.005 No
*20 Centinela Avenue & AM C C -0.001 No
Rose Avenue PM E E -0.003 No
*21 Walgrove Avenue & AM A A 0.003 No
Palms Boulevard PM C C 0.003 No
*22 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.007 No
Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No
*23 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM F F 0.001 No
Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.003 No
*24 Walgrove Avenue & AM E E 0.003 No
Venice Boulevard PM E E 0.003 No
*25 Beethoven Street & AM D D 0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM C C 0.001 No
*26 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F 0.000 No
*27 Inglewood Boulevard & AM D D -0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No
Inglewood Boulevard & AM C C -0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No
City of Santa Monica Methodology
Peak Delay or V/C Significant Delay or V/C Residual
Intersection Hour Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Impact? Delay V/C LOS Change Impact?
1 20th Street & AM 19 0.657 B 19 0.657 B 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 20 0.682 B 20 0.683 B 0 No
2 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 26 0.802 C 26 0.802 C 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 22 0.653 C 22 0.654 C 0 No
3 I-10 EB Off-Ramp/34th Street & AM 15 0.631 B 15 0.634 B 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 11 0.587 B 11 0.593 B 0 No
6 20th Street & AM 4 0.427 A 4 0.425 A 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM 18 0.702 B 18 0.701 B 0 No
7 23rd Street & AM 48 1.083 D 48 1.083 D 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM ** 1.374 F ** 1.370 F -0.004 No
8 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 5 0.479 A 5 0.479 A 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM 9 0.613 A 9 0.613 A 0 No
15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM ** N/C F ** N/C F 0 No
Airport Avenue [b] PM 17 N/C C 17 N/C C 0 No
16 Donald Douglas Loop South & AM 9 0.316 A 9 0.318 A 0 No
Airport Avenue [c] PM 8 0.259 A 8 0.280 A 0 No
17 Bundy Drive & AM 6 0.765 A 6 0.773 A 0 No 4 0.720 A -2 No
Airport Avenue PM 4 0.759 A 5 0.800 A 1 No 4 0.777 A 0 No
Notes:
* Intersection is currently operating under ATSAC system.
** Indicates oversaturated conditions. Delay cannot be calculated.
[a] Intersection is controlled by stop sign(s). The top rows show analysis using Highway Capacity Manual stop-controlled methodology, for the purpose of evaluating the
operating condition of the intersection. Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio. The bottom rows show analysis using the CMA
methodology, for the purpose of application of the City of Los Angeles significance criteria. V/C ratio is reported.
[b] Intersection is two-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the most constrained approach.
[c] Intersection is all-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle.
1.201 1.202
1.297 1.295
Cumulative Base
Cumulative plus
Project
Cumulative plus
Project
1.091
1.229 1.227
0.717 0.716
TABLE 14
FUTURE (2010) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - ALTERNATIVE A4
No Feasible Mitigation
17
1.090
1.034 1.035
** **
0.544
Cumulative Base
Cumulative plus
Project
Cum+Project with
Mitigations
0.964
1.404
1.100 1.108
0.926 0.949
1.021
1.073 1.075
0.459 0.459
1.321 1.321
1.091
1.103
0.775 0.776
0.908 0.911
0.926 0.929
0.897 0.898
1.079 1.084
1.099 1.100
1.100
0.744 0.747
1.033 1.040
0.932 0.929
0.592 0.595
1.396 1.401
0.788 0.787
0.950 1.041
1.376 1.381
**
0.826 0.844
0.823 0.833
0.855 0.912
0.527 0.615
0.508 0.575
0.861 0.883
1.302 1.337
Delay or V/C
0.861 0.861
1.367 1.376
Delay or V/C
1.019
1.361
0.963
0.543
1.090
17
**
No Feasible Mitigation
No Feasible Mitigation
Delay or V/C
0.792
0.912
0.763
0.869
0.867 0.866
1.229 1.227
Page III-71
City of Los Angeles Methodology
Peak V/C Significant V/C Residual
Intersection Hour LOS LOS Change Impact? LOS Change Impact?
*4 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.000 No
Pico Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No
*5 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.001 No
I-10 Freeway EB on-ramp PM D D 0.022 Yes
*9 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.031 Yes
Ocean Park Boulevard PM F F 0.039 Yes
*10 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.008 No
National Boulevard PM E E 0.022 Yes
*11 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM E E 0.001 No
National Boulevard PM F F 0.002 No
*12 I-405 Freeway SB On-Ramp & AM A A 0.000 No
National Boulevard PM A A 0.001 No
*13 I-405 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & AM A B 0.088 No
National Boulevard PM A A 0.067 No
*14 Sepulveda Boulevard & AM F F 0.000 No
National Boulevard PM F F 0.001 No
15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM F F
Airport Avenue [a] PM C C
AM 0.011 Yes 0.009 No
PM 0.001 No 0.001 No
*17 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.012 No C -0.037 No
Airport Avenue PM D D 0.032 Yes D 0.024 Yes
18 Bundy Drive & AM F
Project Driveway PM F
signalized AM D 0.007 No C -0.073 No
signalized PM E 0.035 Yes D -0.105 No
*19 Walgrove Avenue & AM F F 0.005 No
Rose Avenue PM F F 0.005 No
*20 Centinela Avenue & AM C C -0.001 No
Rose Avenue PM E E -0.003 No
*21 Walgrove Avenue & AM A A 0.003 No
Palms Boulevard PM C C 0.003 No
*22 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.007 No
Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No
*23 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM F F 0.001 No
Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.003 No
*24 Walgrove Avenue & AM E E 0.003 No
Venice Boulevard PM E E 0.003 No
*25 Beethoven Street & AM D D 0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM C C 0.001 No
*26 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F 0.000 No
*27 Inglewood Boulevard & AM D D -0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No
Inglewood Boulevard & AM C C -0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No
City of Santa Monica Methodology
Peak Delay or V/C Significant Delay or V/C Residual
Intersection Hour Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Impact? Delay V/C LOS Change Impact?
1 20th Street & AM 19 0.657 B 19 0.657 B 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 20 0.682 B 20 0.683 B 0 No
2 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 26 0.802 C 26 0.802 C 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 22 0.653 C 22 0.653 C 0 No
3 I-10 EB Off-Ramp/34th Street & AM 15 0.631 B 15 0.633 B 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 11 0.587 B 11 0.589 B 0 No
6 20th Street & AM 4 0.427 A 4 0.425 A 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM 18 0.702 B 18 0.701 B 0 No
7 23rd Street & AM 48 1.083 D 49 1.084 D 1 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM ** 1.374 F ** 1.368 F -0.006 No
8 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 5 0.479 A 5 0.479 A 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM 9 0.613 A 9 0.613 A 0 No
15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM ** N/C F ** N/C F N/C Yes ** N/C F N/C No
Airport Avenue [b] PM 17 N/C C 17 N/C C 0 No 17 N/C C 0 No
16 Donald Douglas Loop South & AM 9 0.316 A 9 0.323 A 0 No
Airport Avenue [c] PM 8 0.259 A 9 0.296 A 1 No
17 Bundy Drive & AM 6 0.765 A 6 0.777 A 0 No 4 0.720 A -2 No
Airport Avenue PM 4 0.759 A 5 0.787 A 1 No 4 0.757 A 0 No
Notes:
* Intersection is currently operating under ATSAC system.
** Indicates oversaturated conditions. Delay cannot be calculated.
[a] Intersection is controlled by stop sign(s). The top rows show analysis using Highway Capacity Manual stop-controlled methodology, for the purpose of evaluating the
operating condition of the intersection. Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio. The bottom rows show analysis using the CMA
methodology, for the purpose of application of the City of Los Angeles significance criteria. V/C ratio is reported.
[b] Intersection is two-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the most constrained approach.
[c] Intersection is all-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle.
TABLE 15
FUTURE (2010) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - ALTERNATIVE A5
No Feasible Mitigation
Cumulative Base
Cumulative plus
Project
Cum+Project with
Mitigations
Delay or V/CDelay or V/C
0.861
Cumulative Base
Cumulative plus
Project
Cumulative plus
Project
0.861
1.367
0.926 0.948
0.964
1.019
1.361
0.963
1.302 1.333
1.400
1.100 1.108
1.372
1.020
0.861 0.883
1.075
0.459 0.459
0.5440.543
1.073
0.527 0.615
0.508 0.575
1.090
1.034 1.035
** **
1.090
17
0.823 0.835
0.855 0.887
1.201 1.212
1.297 1.298
17
**
0.826 0.833
**
0.950 0.985
1.376 1.381
1.396 1.401
0.788 0.787
0.932 0.929
0.592 0.595
0.744 0.747
1.033 1.040
1.229 1.227
1.100 1.103
0.775 0.776
0.908 0.911
0.926 0.929
0.717 0.716
1.321 1.321
1.091 1.091
0.897 0.898
Delay or V/C
1.079 1.084
1.099 1.100
0.786
1.210
1.298
0.879
0.753
0.845
No Feasible Mitigation
No Feasible Mitigation
0.867 0.866
1.229 1.227
Page III-72
City of Los Angeles Methodology
Peak V/C Significant V/C Residual
Intersection Hour LOS LOS Change Impact? LOS Change Impact?
*4 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.000 No
Pico Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No
*5 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.001 No
I-10 Freeway EB on-ramp PM D D 0.022 Yes
*9 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.031 Yes
Ocean Park Boulevard PM F F 0.039 Yes
*10 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.008 No
National Boulevard PM E E 0.022 Yes
*11 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM E E 0.001 No
National Boulevard PM F F 0.002 No
*12 I-405 Freeway SB On-Ramp & AM A A 0.000 No
National Boulevard PM A A 0.001 No
*13 I-405 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & AM A B 0.088 No
National Boulevard PM A A 0.067 No
*14 Sepulveda Boulevard & AM F F 0.000 No
National Boulevard PM F F 0.001 No
15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM F F
Airport Avenue [a] PM C C
AM 0.011 Yes 0.009 No
PM 0.001 No 0.001 No
*17 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.024 Yes C -0.032 No
Airport Avenue PM D E 0.102 Yes E 0.080 Yes
18 Bundy Drive & AM F
Project Driveway PM F
signalized AM C -0.027 No
signalized PM E 0.001 No
*19 Walgrove Avenue & AM F F 0.005 No
Rose Avenue PM F F 0.005 No
*20 Centinela Avenue & AM C C -0.001 No
Rose Avenue PM E E -0.003 No
*21 Walgrove Avenue & AM A A 0.003 No
Palms Boulevard PM C C 0.003 No
*22 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.007 No
Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No
*23 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM F F 0.001 No
Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.003 No
*24 Walgrove Avenue & AM E E 0.003 No
Venice Boulevard PM E E 0.003 No
*25 Beethoven Street & AM D D 0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM C C 0.001 No
*26 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F 0.000 No
*27 Inglewood Boulevard & AM D D -0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No
Inglewood Boulevard & AM C C -0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No
City of Santa Monica Methodology
Peak Delay or V/C Significant Delay or V/C Residual
Intersection Hour Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Impact? Delay V/C LOS Change Impact?
1 20th Street & AM 19 0.657 B 19 0.657 B 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 20 0.682 B 20 0.683 B 0 No
2 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 26 0.802 C 26 0.802 C 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 22 0.653 C 22 0.653 C 0 No
3 I-10 EB Off-Ramp/34th Street & AM 15 0.631 B 15 0.633 B 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 11 0.587 B 11 0.589 B 0 No
6 20th Street & AM 4 0.427 A 4 0.425 A 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM 18 0.702 B 18 0.701 B 0 No
7 23rd Street & AM 48 1.083 D 49 1.084 D 1 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM ** 1.374 F ** 1.368 F -0.006 No
8 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 5 0.479 A 5 0.479 A 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM 9 0.613 A 9 0.613 A 0 No
15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM ** N/C F ** N/C F N/C Yes ** N/C F N/C No
Airport Avenue [b] PM 17 N/C C 17 N/C C 0 No 17 N/C C 0 No
16 Donald Douglas Loop South & AM 9 0.316 A 9 0.334 A 0 No
Airport Avenue [c] PM 8 0.259 A 9 0.317 A 1 No
17 Bundy Drive & AM 6 0.765 A 8 0.791 A 2 No 5 0.725 A -1 No
Airport Avenue PM 4 0.759 A 8 0.855 A 4 No 5 0.806 A 1 No
Notes:
* Intersection is currently operating under ATSAC system.
** Indicates oversaturated conditions. Delay cannot be calculated.
[a] Intersection is controlled by stop sign(s). The top rows show analysis using Highway Capacity Manual stop-controlled methodology, for the purpose of evaluating the
operating condition of the intersection. Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio. The bottom rows show analysis using the CMA
methodology, for the purpose of application of the City of Los Angeles significance criteria. V/C ratio is reported.
[b] Intersection is two-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the most constrained approach.
[c] Intersection is all-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle.
TABLE 16
FUTURE (2010) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - ALTERNATIVE A6
No Feasible Mitigation
17
1.090
Cumulative Base
Cumulative plus
Project
Cum+Project with
Mitigations
1.034 1.035
1.201 1.212
1.297 1.298
Cumulative Base
Cumulative plus
Project
Cumulative plus
Project
1.091
1.229 1.227
0.717 0.716
1.100 1.103
0.775 0.776
0.908
1.321 1.321
1.091
0.911
0.926 0.929
0.897 0.898
1.079 1.084
1.099 1.100
0.744 0.747
1.033 1.040
0.932 0.929
0.592 0.595
1.396 1.401
0.788 0.787
0.950 0.951
1.376 1.381
**
0.826 0.799
0.823 0.847
0.855 0.957
** **
0.544
0.527 0.615
0.508 0.575
0.964
1.073 1.075
0.459 0.459
1.400
1.100 1.108
0.926 0.948
1.020
0.861 0.883
1.302 1.333
Delay or V/C
0.861 0.861
1.367 1.372
Delay or V/C
1.019
1.361
0.963
0.543
1.090
17
**
No Feasible Mitigation
No Feasible Mitigation
Delay or V/C
0.791
1.210
1.298
0.935
0.867 0.866
1.229 1.227
Page III-73
City of Los Angeles Methodology
Peak V/C Significant V/C Residual
Intersection Hour LOS LOS Change Impact? LOS Change Impact?
*4 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.000 No
Pico Boulevard PM F F 0.009 No
*5 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.002 No
I-10 Freeway EB on-ramp PM D D 0.022 Yes
*9 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.035 Yes
Ocean Park Boulevard PM F F 0.043 Yes
*10 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.008 No
National Boulevard PM E E 0.023 Yes
*11 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM E E 0.001 No
National Boulevard PM F F 0.002 No
*12 I-405 Freeway SB On-Ramp & AM A A 0.000 No
National Boulevard PM A A 0.001 No
*13 I-405 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & AM A B 0.088 No
National Boulevard PM A A 0.067 No
*14 Sepulveda Boulevard & AM F F 0.000 No
National Boulevard PM F F 0.001 No
15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM F F
Airport Avenue [a] PM C C
AM 0.001 No
PM -0.004 No
*17 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.026 Yes C -0.025 No
Airport Avenue PM D E 0.109 Yes E 0.094 Yes
18 Bundy Drive & AM F
Project Driveway PM F
signalized AM C -0.027 No C -0.027 No
signalized PM E 0.014 Yes D -0.071 No
*19 Walgrove Avenue & AM F F 0.006 No
Rose Avenue PM F F 0.007 No
*20 Centinela Avenue & AM C C -0.001 No
Rose Avenue PM E E -0.002 No
*21 Walgrove Avenue & AM A A 0.003 No
Palms Boulevard PM C C 0.003 No
*22 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.007 No
Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No
*23 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM F F 0.001 No
Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.003 No
*24 Walgrove Avenue & AM E E 0.003 No
Venice Boulevard PM E E 0.003 No
*25 Beethoven Street & AM D D 0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM C C 0.001 No
*26 Centinela Avenue & AM F F -0.049 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F 0.000 No
*27 Inglewood Boulevard & AM D D -0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No
Inglewood Boulevard & AM C C -0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No
City of Santa Monica Methodology
Peak Delay or V/C Significant Delay or V/C Residual
Intersection Hour Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Impact? Delay V/C LOS Change Impact?
1 20th Street & AM 19 0.657 B 19 0.657 B 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 20 0.682 B 20 0.683 B 0 No
2 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 26 0.802 C 26 0.802 C 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 22 0.653 C 22 0.654 C 0 No
3 I-10 EB Off-Ramp/34th Street & AM 15 0.631 B 15 0.634 B 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 11 0.587 B 11 0.593 B 0 No
6 20th Street & AM 4 0.427 A 4 0.425 A 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM 18 0.702 B 18 0.701 B 0 No
7 23rd Street & AM 48 1.083 D 48 1.083 D 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM ** 1.374 F ** 1.370 F -0.004 No
8 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 5 0.479 A 5 0.479 A 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM 9 0.613 A 9 0.613 A 0 No
15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM ** N/C F ** N/C F 0 No
Airport Avenue [b] PM 17 N/C C 17 N/C C 0 No
16 Donald Douglas Loop South & AM 9 0.316 A 9 0.333 A 0 No
Airport Avenue [c] PM 8 0.259 A 9 0.306 A 1 No
17 Bundy Drive & AM 6 0.765 A 8 0.793 A 2 No 5 0.727 A -1 No
Airport Avenue PM 4 0.759 A 8 0.862 A 4 No 6 0.813 A 2 No
Notes:
* Intersection is currently operating under ATSAC system.
** Indicates oversaturated conditions. Delay cannot be calculated.
[a] Intersection is controlled by stop sign(s). The top rows show analysis using Highway Capacity Manual stop-controlled methodology, for the purpose of evaluating the
operating condition of the intersection. Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio. The bottom rows show analysis using the CMA
methodology, for the purpose of application of the City of Los Angeles significance criteria. V/C ratio is reported.
[b] Intersection is two-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the most constrained approach.
[c] Intersection is all-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle.
TABLE 17
FUTURE (2010) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - ALTERNATIVE A7
No Feasible Mitigation
17
1.090
1.034 1.035
** **
0.544
1.201 1.202
1.297 1.293
Cumulative Base
Cumulative plus
Project
Cumulative plus
Project
Cumulative Base
Cumulative plus
Project
Cum+Project with
Mitigations
1.229 1.227
0.717 0.716
1.321 1.272
1.091 1.091
1.100 1.103
0.775 0.776
0.908 0.911
0.926 0.929
0.897 0.898
1.079 1.084
1.099 1.100
0.744 0.747
1.033 1.040
0.932 0.930
0.592 0.595
1.396 1.403
0.788 0.787
0.950 0.964
1.376 1.382
**
0.826 0.799
0.823 0.849
0.855 0.964
0.527 0.615
0.508 0.575
0.964
1.073 1.075
0.459 0.459
1.404
1.100 1.108
0.926 0.949
1.021
0.861 0.883
1.302 1.337
Delay or V/C
0.861 0.861
1.367 1.376
Delay or V/C
1.019
1.361
0.963
0.543
1.090
17
**
No Feasible Mitigation
No Feasible Mitigation
Delay or V/C
0.798
0.949
0.799
0.879
0.867 0.866
1.229 1.227
Page III-74
City of Los Angeles Methodology
Peak V/C Significant V/C Residual
Intersection Hour LOS LOS Change Impact? LOS Change Impact?
*4 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.000 No
Pico Boulevard PM F F 0.009 No
*5 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.002 No
I-10 Freeway EB on-ramp PM D D 0.022 Yes
*9 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.035 Yes
Ocean Park Boulevard PM F F 0.043 Yes
*10 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.008 No
National Boulevard PM E E 0.023 Yes
*11 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM E E 0.001 No
National Boulevard PM F F 0.002 No
*12 I-405 Freeway SB On-Ramp & AM A A 0.000 No
National Boulevard PM A A 0.001 No
*13 I-405 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & AM A B 0.088 No
National Boulevard PM A A 0.067 No
*14 Sepulveda Boulevard & AM F F 0.000 No
National Boulevard PM F F 0.001 No
15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM F F
Airport Avenue [a] PM C C
AM 0.001 No
PM -0.004 No
*17 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.026 Yes C -0.034 No
Airport Avenue PM D E 0.109 Yes E 0.079 Yes
18 Bundy Drive & AM F
Project Driveway PM F
signalized AM D -0.015 No D -0.015 No
signalized PM E 0.029 Yes D -0.053 No
*19 Walgrove Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No
Rose Avenue PM F F 0.000 No
*20 Centinela Avenue & AM C C 0.002 No
Rose Avenue PM E E 0.002 No
*21 Walgrove Avenue & AM A A 0.003 No
Palms Boulevard PM C C 0.003 No
*22 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.007 No
Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No
*23 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM F F 0.001 No
Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.003 No
*24 Walgrove Avenue & AM E E 0.003 No
Venice Boulevard PM E E 0.003 No
*25 Beethoven Street & AM D D 0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM C C 0.001 No
*26 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F 0.000 No
*27 Inglewood Boulevard & AM D D -0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No
Inglewood Boulevard & AM C C -0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No
City of Santa Monica Methodology
Peak Delay or V/C Significant Delay or V/C Residual
Intersection Hour Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Impact? Delay V/C LOS Change Impact?
1 20th Street & AM 19 0.657 B 19 0.657 B 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 20 0.682 B 20 0.683 B 0 No
2 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 26 0.802 C 26 0.802 C 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 22 0.653 C 22 0.654 C 0 No
3 I-10 EB Off-Ramp/34th Street & AM 15 0.631 B 15 0.634 B 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 11 0.587 B 11 0.593 B 0 No
6 20th Street & AM 4 0.427 A 4 0.425 A 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM 18 0.702 B 18 0.701 B 0 No
7 23rd Street & AM 48 1.083 D 48 1.083 D 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM ** 1.374 F ** 1.370 F -0.004 No
8 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 5 0.479 A 5 0.479 A 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM 9 0.613 A 9 0.613 A 0 No
15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM ** N/C F ** N/C F 0 No
Airport Avenue [b] PM 17 N/C C 17 N/C C 0 No
16 Donald Douglas Loop South & AM 9 0.316 A 9 0.328 A 0 No
Airport Avenue [c] PM 8 0.259 A 9 0.287 A 1 No
17 Bundy Drive & AM 6 0.765 A 8 0.793 A 2 No 5 0.724 A -1 No
Airport Avenue PM 4 0.759 A 8 0.862 A 4 No 5 0.809 A 1 No
Notes:
* Intersection is currently operating under ATSAC system.
** Indicates oversaturated conditions. Delay cannot be calculated.
[a] Intersection is controlled by stop sign(s). The top rows show analysis using Highway Capacity Manual stop-controlled methodology, for the purpose of evaluating the
operating condition of the intersection. Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio. The bottom rows show analysis using the CMA
methodology, for the purpose of application of the City of Los Angeles significance criteria. V/C ratio is reported.
[b] Intersection is two-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the most constrained approach.
[c] Intersection is all-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle.
TABLE 18
FUTURE (2010) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - ALTERNATIVE A8
No Feasible Mitigation
1.376
1.021
0.861
Cumulative Base
Cumulative plus
Project
Cumulative plus
Project
Cumulative Base
Cumulative plus
Project
Cum+Project with
Mitigations
Delay or V/C
0.861 0.861
1.367
Delay or V/C
1.019
1.361
0.963
0.543
1.090
17
**
0.883
1.302 1.337
1.404
1.100 1.108
0.926 0.949
0.964
1.073 1.075
0.459 0.459
0.544
0.527 0.615
0.508 0.575
1.090
1.034 1.035
** **
17
0.823 0.849
0.855 0.964
1.201 1.202
1.297 1.293
**
0.826 0.811
0.950 0.979
1.376 1.376
1.396 1.396
0.788 0.790
0.932 0.934
0.592 0.595
0.744 0.747
1.033 1.040
1.229 1.227
1.100 1.103
0.775 0.776
0.908 0.911
0.926 0.929
0.717 0.716
1.321 1.321
1.091 1.091
0.897 0.898
Delay or V/C
1.079 1.084
1.099 1.100
0.789
0.934
0.811
0.897
No Feasible Mitigation
No Feasible Mitigation
0.867 0.866
1.229 1.227
Page III-75
City of Los Angeles Methodology
Peak V/C Significant V/C Residual
Intersection Hour LOS LOS Change Impact? LOS Change Impact?
*4 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.000 No
Pico Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No
*5 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.001 No
I-10 Freeway EB on-ramp PM D D 0.022 Yes
*9 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.031 Yes
Ocean Park Boulevard PM F F 0.039 Yes
*10 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.008 No
National Boulevard PM E E 0.022 Yes
*11 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM E E 0.001 No
National Boulevard PM F F 0.002 No
*12 I-405 Freeway SB On-Ramp & AM A A 0.000 No
National Boulevard PM A A 0.001 No
*13 I-405 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & AM A B 0.088 No
National Boulevard PM A A 0.067 No
*14 Sepulveda Boulevard & AM F F 0.000 No
National Boulevard PM F F 0.001 No
15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM F F
Airport Avenue [a] PM C C
AM 0.011 Yes 0.009 No
PM 0.001 No 0.001 No
*17 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.024 Yes C -0.036 No
Airport Avenue PM D E 0.102 Yes E 0.102 Yes
18 Bundy Drive & AM F F
Project Driveway [a] PM F F
AM -0.017 No D -0.017 No
PM 0.012 Yes D -0.061 No
*19 Walgrove Avenue & AM F F 0.005 No
Rose Avenue PM F F 0.005 No
*20 Centinela Avenue & AM C C -0.001 No
Rose Avenue PM E E -0.003 No
*21 Walgrove Avenue & AM A A 0.003 No
Palms Boulevard PM C C 0.003 No
*22 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.007 No
Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No
*23 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM F F 0.001 No
Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.003 No
*24 Walgrove Avenue & AM E E 0.003 No
Venice Boulevard PM E E 0.003 No
*25 Beethoven Street & AM D D 0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM C C 0.001 No
*26 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F 0.000 No
*27 Inglewood Boulevard & AM D D -0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No
Inglewood Boulevard & AM C C -0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No
City of Santa Monica Methodology
Peak Delay or V/C Significant Delay or V/C Residual
Intersection Hour Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Impact? Delay V/C LOS Change Impact?
1 20th Street & AM 19 0.657 B 19 0.657 B 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 20 0.682 B 20 0.683 B 0 No
2 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 26 0.802 C 26 0.802 C 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 22 0.653 C 22 0.653 C 0 No
3 I-10 EB Off-Ramp/34th Street & AM 15 0.631 B 15 0.633 B 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 11 0.587 B 11 0.589 B 0 No
6 20th Street & AM 4 0.427 A 4 0.425 A 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM 18 0.702 B 18 0.701 B 0 No
7 23rd Street & AM 48 1.083 D 49 1.084 D 1 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM ** 1.374 F ** 1.368 F -0.006 No
8 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 5 0.479 A 5 0.479 A 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM 9 0.613 A 9 0.613 A 0 No
15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM ** N/C F ** N/C F N/C Yes ** N/C F N/C No
Airport Avenue [b] PM 17 N/C C 17 N/C C 0 No 17 N/C C 0 No
16 Donald Douglas Loop South & AM 9 0.316 A 9 0.330 A 0 No
Airport Avenue [c] PM 8 0.259 A 9 0.310 A 1 No
17 Bundy Drive & AM 6 0.765 A 7 0.791 A 1 No 5 0.723 A -1 No
Airport Avenue PM 4 0.759 A 7 0.855 A 3 No 5 0.803 A 1 No
Notes:
* Intersection is currently operating under ATSAC system.
** Indicates oversaturated conditions. Delay cannot be calculated.
[a] Intersection is controlled by stop sign(s). The top rows show analysis using Highway Capacity Manual stop-controlled methodology, for the purpose of evaluating the
operating condition of the intersection. Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio. The bottom rows show analysis using the CMA
methodology, for the purpose of application of the City of Los Angeles significance criteria. V/C ratio is reported.
[b] Intersection is two-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the most constrained approach.
[c] Intersection is all-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle.
TABLE 19
FUTURE (2010) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - ALTERNATIVE A9
No Feasible Mitigation
Cumulative Base
Cumulative plus
Project
Cum+Project with
Mitigations
Delay or V/CDelay or V/C
0.861
Cumulative Base
Cumulative plus
Project
Cumulative plus
Project
0.861
1.367
0.926 0.948
0.964
1.019
1.361
0.963
1.302 1.333
1.400
1.100 1.108
1.372
1.020
0.861 0.883
1.075
0.459 0.459
0.5440.543
1.073
0.527 0.615
0.508 0.575
1.090
1.034 1.035
** **
1.090
17
0.823 0.847
0.855 0.957
1.201 1.212
1.297 1.298
17
**
** **
0.826 0.809
**
0.950 0.962
1.376 1.381
1.396 1.401
0.788 0.787
0.932 0.929
0.592 0.595
0.744 0.747
1.033 1.040
1.229 1.227
1.100 1.103
0.775 0.776
0.908 0.911
0.926 0.929
0.717 0.716
1.321 1.321
1.091 1.091
0.897 0.898
Delay or V/C
1.079 1.084
1.099 1.100
0.787
1.210
1.298
0.957
0.809
0.889
No Feasible Mitigation
No Feasible Mitigation
0.867 0.866
1.229 1.227
Page III-76
City of Los Angeles Methodology
Peak V/C Significant V/C Residual
Intersection Hour LOS LOS Change Impact? LOS Change Impact?
*4 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.000 No
Pico Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No
*5 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.001 No
I-10 Freeway EB on-ramp PM D D 0.022 Yes
*9 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.031 Yes
Ocean Park Boulevard PM F F 0.039 Yes
*10 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.008 No
National Boulevard PM E E 0.022 Yes
*11 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM E E 0.001 No
National Boulevard PM F F 0.002 No
*12 I-405 Freeway SB On-Ramp & AM A A 0.000 No
National Boulevard PM A A 0.001 No
*13 I-405 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & AM A B 0.088 No
National Boulevard PM A A 0.067 No
*14 Sepulveda Boulevard & AM F F 0.000 No
National Boulevard PM F F 0.001 No
15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM F F
Airport Avenue [a] PM C C
AM 0.011 Yes 0.009 No
PM 0.001 No 0.001 No
*17 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.024 Yes C -0.036 No
Airport Avenue PM D E 0.102 Yes E 0.072 Yes
18 Bundy Drive & AM F C
Project Driveway [a] PM F D
AM D -0.018 No D -0.018 No
PM E 0.011 Yes D -0.063 No
*19 Walgrove Avenue & AM F F 0.005 No
Rose Avenue PM F F 0.005 No
*20 Centinela Avenue & AM C C -0.001 No
Rose Avenue PM E E -0.003 No
*21 Walgrove Avenue & AM A A 0.003 No
Palms Boulevard PM C C 0.003 No
*22 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.007 No
Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No
*23 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM F F 0.001 No
Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.003 No
*24 Walgrove Avenue & AM E E 0.003 No
Venice Boulevard PM E E 0.003 No
*25 Beethoven Street & AM D D 0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM C C 0.001 No
*26 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F 0.000 No
*27 Inglewood Boulevard & AM D D -0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No
Inglewood Boulevard & AM C C -0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No
City of Santa Monica Methodology
Peak Delay or V/C Significant Delay or V/C Residual
Intersection Hour Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Impact? Delay V/C LOS Change Impact?
1 20th Street & AM 19 0.657 B 19 0.657 B 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 20 0.682 B 20 0.683 B 0 No
2 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 26 0.802 C 26 0.802 C 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 22 0.653 C 22 0.653 C 0 No
3 I-10 EB Off-Ramp/34th Street & AM 15 0.631 B 15 0.633 B 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 11 0.587 B 11 0.589 B 0 No
6 20th Street & AM 4 0.427 A 4 0.425 A 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM 18 0.702 B 18 0.701 B 0 No
7 23rd Street & AM 48 1.083 D 49 1.084 D 1 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM ** 1.374 F ** 1.368 F -0.006 No
8 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 5 0.479 A 5 0.479 A 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM 9 0.613 A 9 0.613 A 0 No
15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM ** N/C F ** N/C F N/C Yes ** N/C F N/C No
Airport Avenue [b] PM 17 N/C C 17 N/C C 0 No 17 N/C C 0 No
16 Donald Douglas Loop South & AM 9 0.316 A 9 0.323 A 0 No
Airport Avenue [c] PM 8 0.259 A 9 0.296 A 1 No
17 Bundy Drive & AM 6 0.765 A 8 0.791 A 2 No 5 0.723 A -1 No
Airport Avenue PM 4 0.759 A 8 0.855 A 4 No 5 0.803 A 1 No
Notes:
* Intersection is currently operating under ATSAC system.
** Indicates oversaturated conditions. Delay cannot be calculated.
[a] Intersection is controlled by stop sign(s). The top rows show analysis using Highway Capacity Manual stop-controlled methodology, for the purpose of evaluating the
operating condition of the intersection. Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio. The bottom rows show analysis using the CMA
methodology, for the purpose of application of the City of Los Angeles significance criteria. V/C ratio is reported.
[b] Intersection is two-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the most constrained approach.
[c] Intersection is all-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle.
TABLE 20
FUTURE (2010) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - ALTERNATIVE A10
No Feasible Mitigation
17
1.090
Cumulative Base
Cumulative plus
Project
Cum+Project with
Mitigations
1.034 1.035
1.201 1.212
1.297 1.298
Cumulative Base
Cumulative plus
Project
Cumulative plus
Project
1.091
1.229 1.227
0.717 0.716
1.100 1.103
0.775 0.776
0.908
1.321 1.321
1.091
0.911
0.926 0.929
0.897 0.898
1.079 1.084
1.099 1.100
0.744 0.747
1.033 1.040
0.932 0.929
0.592 0.595
1.396 1.401
0.788 0.787
0.950 0.961
1.376 1.381
21
** 31
0.826 0.808
0.823 0.847
0.855 0.957
** **
0.544
0.527 0.615
0.508 0.575
0.964
1.073 1.075
0.459 0.459
1.400
1.100 1.108
0.926 0.948
1.020
0.861 0.883
1.302 1.333
Delay or V/C
0.861 0.861
1.367 1.372
Delay or V/C
1.019
1.361
0.963
0.543
1.090
17
**
No Feasible Mitigation
No Feasible Mitigation
Delay or V/C
0.787
1.210
1.298
0.927
0.808
0.887
0.867 0.866
1.229 1.227
Page III-77
City of Los Angeles Methodology
Peak V/C Significant V/C Residual
Intersection Hour LOS LOS Change Impact? LOS Change Impact?
*4 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.000 No
Pico Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No
*5 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.001 No
I-10 Freeway EB on-ramp PM D D 0.022 Yes
*9 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.031 Yes
Ocean Park Boulevard PM F F 0.039 Yes
*10 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.008 No
National Boulevard PM E E 0.022 Yes
*11 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM E E 0.001 No
National Boulevard PM F F 0.002 No
*12 I-405 Freeway SB On-Ramp & AM A A 0.000 No
National Boulevard PM A A 0.001 No
*13 I-405 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & AM A B 0.088 No
National Boulevard PM A A 0.067 No
*14 Sepulveda Boulevard & AM F F 0.000 No
National Boulevard PM F F 0.001 No
15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM F F
Airport Avenue [a] PM C C
AM 0.011 Yes 0.009 No
PM 0.001 No 0.001 No
*17 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.012 No C -0.038 No
Airport Avenue PM D D 0.037 Yes D 0.028 Yes
18 Bundy Drive & AM F
Project Driveway PM F
signalized AM D 0.008 No C -0.073 No
signalized PM E 0.042 Yes D -0.107 No
*19 Walgrove Avenue & AM F F 0.005 No
Rose Avenue PM F F 0.005 No
*20 Centinela Avenue & AM C C -0.001 No
Rose Avenue PM E E -0.003 No
*21 Walgrove Avenue & AM A A 0.003 No
Palms Boulevard PM C C 0.003 No
*22 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.007 No
Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No
*23 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM F F 0.001 No
Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.003 No
*24 Walgrove Avenue & AM E E 0.003 No
Venice Boulevard PM E E 0.003 No
*25 Beethoven Street & AM D D 0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM C C 0.001 No
*26 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F 0.000 No
*27 Inglewood Boulevard & AM D D -0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No
Inglewood Boulevard & AM C C -0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No
City of Santa Monica Methodology
Peak Delay or V/C Significant Delay or V/C Residual
Intersection Hour Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Impact? Delay V/C LOS Change Impact?
1 20th Street & AM 19 0.657 B 19 0.657 B 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 20 0.682 B 20 0.683 B 0 No
2 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 26 0.802 C 26 0.802 C 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 22 0.653 C 22 0.653 C 0 No
3 I-10 EB Off-Ramp/34th Street & AM 15 0.631 B 15 0.633 B 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 11 0.587 B 11 0.589 B 0 No
6 20th Street & AM 4 0.427 A 4 0.425 A 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM 18 0.702 B 18 0.701 B 0 No
7 23rd Street & AM 48 1.083 D 49 1.084 D 1 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM ** 1.374 F ** 1.368 F -0.006 No
8 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 5 0.479 A 5 0.479 A 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM 9 0.613 A 9 0.613 A 0 No
15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM ** N/C F ** N/C F N/C Yes ** N/C F N/C No
Airport Avenue [b] PM 17 N/C C 17 N/C C 0 No 17 N/C C 0 No
16 Donald Douglas Loop South & AM 9 0.316 A 9 0.379 A 0 No
Airport Avenue [c] PM 8 0.259 A 9 0.300 A 1 No
17 Bundy Drive & AM 6 0.765 A 6 0.777 A 0 No 4 0.720 A -2 No
Airport Avenue PM 4 0.759 A 5 0.792 A 1 No 4 0.762 A 0 No
Notes:
* Intersection is currently operating under ATSAC system.
** Indicates oversaturated conditions. Delay cannot be calculated.
[a] Intersection is controlled by stop sign(s). The top rows show analysis using Highway Capacity Manual stop-controlled methodology, for the purpose of evaluating the
operating condition of the intersection. Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio. The bottom rows show analysis using the CMA
methodology, for the purpose of application of the City of Los Angeles significance criteria. V/C ratio is reported.
[b] Intersection is two-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the most constrained approach.
[c] Intersection is all-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle.
TABLE 21
FUTURE (2010) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - ALTERNATIVE B1
No Feasible Mitigation
Cumulative Base
Cumulative plus
Project
Cum+Project with
Mitigations
Delay or V/CDelay or V/C
0.861
Cumulative Base
Cumulative plus
Project
Cumulative plus
Project
0.861
1.367
0.926 0.948
0.964
1.019
1.361
0.963
1.302 1.333
1.400
1.100 1.108
1.372
1.020
0.861 0.883
1.075
0.459 0.459
0.5440.543
1.073
0.527 0.615
0.508 0.575
1.090
1.034 1.035
** **
1.090
17
0.823 0.835
0.855 0.892
1.201 1.212
1.297 1.298
17
**
0.826 0.834
**
0.950 0.992
1.376 1.381
1.396 1.401
0.788 0.787
0.932 0.929
0.592 0.595
0.744 0.747
1.033 1.040
1.229 1.227
1.100 1.103
0.775 0.776
0.908 0.911
0.926 0.929
0.717 0.716
1.321 1.321
1.091 1.091
0.897 0.898
Delay or V/C
1.079 1.084
1.099 1.100
0.785
1.210
1.298
0.883
0.753
0.843
No Feasible Mitigation
No Feasible Mitigation
0.867 0.866
1.229 1.227
Page III-78
City of Los Angeles Methodology
Peak V/C Significant V/C Residual
Intersection Hour LOS LOS Change Impact? LOS Change Impact?
*4 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.000 No
Pico Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No
*5 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.001 No
I-10 Freeway EB on-ramp PM D D 0.022 Yes
*9 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.031 Yes
Ocean Park Boulevard PM F F 0.039 Yes
*10 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.008 No
National Boulevard PM E E 0.022 Yes
*11 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM E E 0.001 No
National Boulevard PM F F 0.002 No
*12 I-405 Freeway SB On-Ramp & AM A A 0.000 No
National Boulevard PM A A 0.001 No
*13 I-405 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & AM A B 0.088 No
National Boulevard PM A A 0.067 No
*14 Sepulveda Boulevard & AM F F 0.000 No
National Boulevard PM F F 0.001 No
15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM F F
Airport Avenue [a] PM C C
AM 0.011 Yes 0.009 No
PM 0.001 No 0.001 No
*17 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.024 Yes C -0.032 No
Airport Avenue PM D E 0.102 Yes E 0.080 Yes
18 Bundy Drive & AM F
Project Driveway PM F
signalized AM C -0.027 No
signalized PM E 0.001 No
*19 Walgrove Avenue & AM F F 0.005 No
Rose Avenue PM F F 0.005 No
*20 Centinela Avenue & AM C C -0.001 No
Rose Avenue PM E E -0.003 No
*21 Walgrove Avenue & AM A A 0.003 No
Palms Boulevard PM C C 0.003 No
*22 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.007 No
Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No
*23 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM F F 0.001 No
Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.003 No
*24 Walgrove Avenue & AM E E 0.003 No
Venice Boulevard PM E E 0.003 No
*25 Beethoven Street & AM D D 0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM C C 0.001 No
*26 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F 0.000 No
*27 Inglewood Boulevard & AM D D -0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No
Inglewood Boulevard & AM C C -0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No
City of Santa Monica Methodology
Peak Delay or V/C Significant Delay or V/C Residual
Intersection Hour Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Impact? Delay V/C LOS Change Impact?
1 20th Street & AM 19 0.657 B 19 0.657 B 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 20 0.682 B 20 0.683 B 0 No
2 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 26 0.802 C 26 0.802 C 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 22 0.653 C 22 0.653 C 0 No
3 I-10 EB Off-Ramp/34th Street & AM 15 0.631 B 15 0.633 B 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 11 0.587 B 11 0.589 B 0 No
6 20th Street & AM 4 0.427 A 4 0.425 A 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM 18 0.702 B 18 0.701 B 0 No
7 23rd Street & AM 48 1.083 D 49 1.084 D 1 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM ** 1.374 F ** 1.368 F -0.006 No
8 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 5 0.479 A 5 0.479 A 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM 9 0.613 A 9 0.613 A 0 No
15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM ** N/C F ** N/C F N/C Yes ** N/C F N/C No
Airport Avenue [b] PM 17 N/C C 17 N/C C 0 No 17 N/C C 0 No
16 Donald Douglas Loop South & AM 9 0.316 A 9 0.334 A 0 No
Airport Avenue [c] PM 8 0.259 A 9 0.317 A 1 No
17 Bundy Drive & AM 6 0.765 A 8 0.791 A 2 No 5 0.725 A -1 No
Airport Avenue PM 4 0.759 A 8 0.855 A 4 No 5 0.806 A 1 No
Notes:
* Intersection is currently operating under ATSAC system.
** Indicates oversaturated conditions. Delay cannot be calculated.
[a] Intersection is controlled by stop sign(s). The top rows show analysis using Highway Capacity Manual stop-controlled methodology, for the purpose of evaluating the
operating condition of the intersection. Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio. The bottom rows show analysis using the CMA
methodology, for the purpose of application of the City of Los Angeles significance criteria. V/C ratio is reported.
[b] Intersection is two-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the most constrained approach.
[c] Intersection is all-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle.
TABLE 22
FUTURE (2010) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - ALTERNATIVE B2
No Feasible Mitigation
17
1.090
Cumulative Base
Cumulative plus
Project
Cum+Project with
Mitigations
1.034 1.035
1.201 1.212
1.297 1.298
Cumulative Base
Cumulative plus
Project
Cumulative plus
Project
1.091
1.229 1.227
0.717 0.716
1.100 1.103
0.775 0.776
0.908
1.321 1.321
1.091
0.911
0.926 0.929
0.897 0.898
1.079 1.084
1.099 1.100
0.744 0.747
1.033 1.040
0.932 0.929
0.592 0.595
1.396 1.401
0.788 0.787
0.950 0.951
1.376 1.381
**
0.826 0.799
0.823 0.847
0.855 0.957
** **
0.544
0.527 0.615
0.508 0.575
0.964
1.073 1.075
0.459 0.459
1.400
1.100 1.108
0.926 0.948
1.020
0.861 0.883
1.302 1.333
Delay or V/C
0.861 0.861
1.367 1.372
Delay or V/C
1.019
1.361
0.963
0.543
1.090
17
**
No Feasible Mitigation
No Feasible Mitigation
Delay or V/C
0.791
1.210
1.298
0.935
0.867 0.866
1.229 1.227
Page III-79
City of Los Angeles Methodology
Peak V/C Significant V/C Residual
Intersection Hour LOS LOS Change Impact? LOS Change Impact?
*4 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.000 No
Pico Boulevard PM F F 0.009 No
*5 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.002 No
I-10 Freeway EB on-ramp PM D D 0.022 Yes
*9 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.035 Yes
Ocean Park Boulevard PM F F 0.043 Yes
*10 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.008 No
National Boulevard PM E E 0.023 Yes
*11 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM E E 0.001 No
National Boulevard PM F F 0.002 No
*12 I-405 Freeway SB On-Ramp & AM A A 0.000 No
National Boulevard PM A A 0.001 No
*13 I-405 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & AM A B 0.088 No
National Boulevard PM A A 0.067 No
*14 Sepulveda Boulevard & AM F F 0.000 No
National Boulevard PM F F 0.001 No
15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM F F
Airport Avenue [a] PM C C
AM 0.001 No
PM -0.004 No
*17 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.026 Yes C -0.034 No
Airport Avenue PM D E 0.109 Yes E 0.079 Yes
18 Bundy Drive & AM F
Project Driveway PM F
signalized AM D -0.015 No D -0.015 No
signalized PM E 0.029 Yes D -0.053 No
*19 Walgrove Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No
Rose Avenue PM F F 0.000 No
*20 Centinela Avenue & AM C C 0.002 No
Rose Avenue PM E E 0.002 No
*21 Walgrove Avenue & AM A A 0.003 No
Palms Boulevard PM C C 0.003 No
*22 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.007 No
Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No
*23 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM F F 0.001 No
Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.003 No
*24 Walgrove Avenue & AM E E 0.003 No
Venice Boulevard PM E E 0.003 No
*25 Beethoven Street & AM D D 0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM C C 0.001 No
*26 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F 0.000 No
*27 Inglewood Boulevard & AM D D -0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No
Inglewood Boulevard & AM C C -0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No
City of Santa Monica Methodology
Peak Delay or V/C Significant Delay or V/C Residual
Intersection Hour Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Impact? Delay V/C LOS Change Impact?
1 20th Street & AM 19 0.657 B 19 0.657 B 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 20 0.682 B 20 0.683 B 0 No
2 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 26 0.802 C 26 0.802 C 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 22 0.653 C 22 0.654 C 0 No
3 I-10 EB Off-Ramp/34th Street & AM 15 0.631 B 15 0.634 B 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 11 0.587 B 11 0.593 B 0 No
6 20th Street & AM 4 0.427 A 4 0.425 A 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM 18 0.702 B 18 0.701 B 0 No
7 23rd Street & AM 48 1.083 D 48 1.083 D -1 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM ** 1.374 F ** 1.370 F -0.004 No
8 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 5 0.479 A 5 0.479 A 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM 9 0.613 A 9 0.613 A 0 No
15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM ** N/C F ** N/C F 0 No
Airport Avenue [b] PM 17 N/C C 17 N/C C 0 No
16 Donald Douglas Loop South & AM 9 0.316 A 9 0.328 A 0 No
Airport Avenue [c] PM 8 0.259 A 9 0.287 A 1 No
17 Bundy Drive & AM 6 0.765 D 8 0.793 A 12 Yes 5 0.724 A -1 No
Airport Avenue PM 4 0.759 A 8 0.862 A 5 No 5 0.809 A 1 No
Notes:
* Intersection is currently operating under ATSAC system.
** Indicates oversaturated conditions. Delay cannot be calculated.
[a] Intersection is controlled by stop sign(s). The top rows show analysis using Highway Capacity Manual stop-controlled methodology, for the purpose of evaluating the
operating condition of the intersection. Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio. The bottom rows show analysis using the CMA
methodology, for the purpose of application of the City of Los Angeles significance criteria. V/C ratio is reported.
[b] Intersection is two-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the most constrained approach.
[c] Intersection is all-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle.
No Feasible Mitigation
No Feasible Mitigation
0.897
0.934
0.811
0.789
0.897 0.898
Delay or V/C
1.079 1.084
1.099 1.100
0.717 0.716
1.321 1.321
1.091 1.091
1.229 1.227
1.100 1.103
0.775 0.776
0.908 0.911
0.926 0.929
0.744 0.747
1.033 1.040
0.932 0.934
0.592 0.595
1.396 1.396
0.788 0.790
0.950 0.979
1.376 1.376
**
0.826 0.811
17
0.823 0.849
0.855 0.964
1.201 1.202
1.297 1.293
1.090
1.034 1.035
** **
0.544
0.527 0.615
0.508 0.575
0.964
1.073 1.075
0.459 0.459
1.100 1.108
0.926 0.949
0.883
1.302 1.337
1.404
Delay or V/C
1.019
1.361
0.963
0.543
1.090
17
**
Cumulative Base
Cumulative plus
Project
Cumulative plus
Project
Cumulative Base
Cumulative plus
Project
Cum+Project with
Mitigations
Delay or V/C
0.861 0.861
1.367
TABLE 23
FUTURE (2010) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - ALTERNATIVE B3
No Feasible Mitigation
1.376
1.021
0.861
0.867 0.866
1.229 1.227
Page III-80
City of Los Angeles Methodology
Peak V/C Significant V/C Residual
Intersection Hour LOS LOS Change Impact? LOS Change Impact?
*4 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.000 No
Pico Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No
*5 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.001 No
I-10 Freeway EB on-ramp PM D D 0.022 Yes
*9 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.031 Yes
Ocean Park Boulevard PM F F 0.039 Yes
*10 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.008 No
National Boulevard PM E E 0.022 Yes
*11 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM E E 0.001 No
National Boulevard PM F F 0.002 No
*12 I-405 Freeway SB On-Ramp & AM A A 0.000 No
National Boulevard PM A A 0.001 No
*13 I-405 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & AM A B 0.088 No
National Boulevard PM A A 0.067 No
*14 Sepulveda Boulevard & AM F F 0.000 No
National Boulevard PM F F 0.001 No
15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM F F
Airport Avenue [a] PM C C
AM 0.011 Yes F 0.001 No
PM 0.001 No F 0.001 No
*17 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.024 Yes C -0.034 No
Airport Avenue PM D E 0.102 Yes E 0.081 Yes
18 Bundy Drive & AM F
Project Driveway PM F
signalized AM D -0.015 No D -0.015 No
signalized PM E 0.024 Yes D -0.061 No
*19 Walgrove Avenue & AM F F 0.005 No
Rose Avenue PM F F 0.005 No
*20 Centinela Avenue & AM C C -0.001 No
Rose Avenue PM E E -0.003 No
*21 Walgrove Avenue & AM A A 0.003 No
Palms Boulevard PM C C 0.003 No
*22 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.007 No
Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No
*23 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM F F 0.001 No
Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.003 No
*24 Walgrove Avenue & AM E E 0.003 No
Venice Boulevard PM E E 0.003 No
*25 Beethoven Street & AM D D 0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM C C 0.001 No
*26 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F 0.000 No
*27 Inglewood Boulevard & AM D D -0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No
Inglewood Boulevard & AM C C -0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No
City of Santa Monica Methodology
Peak Delay or V/C Significant Delay or V/C Residual
Intersection Hour Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Impact? Delay V/C LOS Change Impact?
1 20th Street & AM 19 0.657 B 15 0.657 B 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 20 0.682 B 18 0.644 B 0 No
2 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 26 0.802 C 26 0.802 C 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 22 0.653 C 22 0.653 C 0 No
3 I-10 EB Off-Ramp/34th Street & AM 15 0.631 B 15 0.633 B 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 11 0.587 B 11 0.589 B 0 No
6 20th Street & AM 4 0.427 A 4 0.428 A 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM 18 0.702 B 18 0.703 B 0 No
7 23rd Street & AM 48 1.083 D 49 1.084 D -1 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM ** 1.374 F ** 1.368 F -0.004 No
8 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 5 0.479 A 5 0.479 A 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM 9 0.613 A 9 0.613 A 0 No
15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM ** N/C F ** N/C F 0 No
Airport Avenue [b] PM 17 N/C C 17 N/C C 0 No
16 Donald Douglas Loop South & AM 9 0.316 A 9 0.329 A 0 No
Airport Avenue [c] PM 8 0.259 A 9 0.315 A 1 No
17 Bundy Drive & AM 6 0.765 D 8 0.791 E 12 Yes 5 0.726 D -2 No
Airport Avenue PM 4 0.759 A 8 0.855 A 5 No 5 0.806 A 2 No
Notes:
* Intersection is currently operating under ATSAC system.
** Indicates oversaturated conditions. Delay cannot be calculated.
[a] Intersection is controlled by stop sign(s). The top rows show analysis using Highway Capacity Manual stop-controlled methodology, for the purpose of evaluating the
operating condition of the intersection. Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio. The bottom rows show analysis using the CMA
methodology, for the purpose of application of the City of Los Angeles significance criteria. V/C ratio is reported.
[b] Intersection is two-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the most constrained approach.
[c] Intersection is all-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle.
TABLE 24
FUTURE (2010) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - ALTERNATIVE B4
No Feasible Mitigation
1.372
1.020
0.861
Cumulative Base
Cumulative plus
Project
Cumulative plus
Project
Cumulative Base
Cumulative plus
Project
Cum+Project with
Mitigations
Delay or V/C
0.861 0.861
1.367
Delay or V/C
1.019
1.361
0.963
0.543
1.090
17
**
0.883
1.302 1.333
1.400
1.100 1.108
0.926 0.948
0.964
1.073 1.075
0.459 0.459
0.544
0.527 0.615
0.508 0.575
1.090
1.034 1.035
** **
17
0.823 0.847
0.855 0.957
1.201 1.212
1.297 1.298
**
0.826 0.811
0.950 0.974
1.376 1.381
1.396 1.401
0.788 0.787
0.932 0.929
0.592 0.595
0.744 0.747
1.033 1.040
1.229 1.227
1.100 1.103
0.775 0.776
0.908 0.911
0.926 0.929
0.717 0.716
1.321 1.321
1.091 1.091
0.897 0.898
Delay or V/C
1.079 1.084
1.099 1.100
0.789
1.202
1.298
0.936
0.811
0.889
No Feasible Mitigation
No Feasible Mitigation
0.867 0.866
1.229 1.227
Page III-81
City of Los Angeles Methodology
Peak V/C Significant V/C Residual
Intersection Hour LOS LOS Change Impact? LOS Change Impact?
*4 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.000 No
Pico Boulevard PM F F 0.009 No
*5 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.002 No
I-10 Freeway EB on-ramp PM D D 0.022 Yes
*9 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.031 Yes
Ocean Park Boulevard PM F F 0.039 Yes
*10 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.008 No
National Boulevard PM E E 0.023 Yes
*11 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM E E 0.001 No
National Boulevard PM F F 0.002 No
*12 I-405 Freeway SB On-Ramp & AM A A 0.000 No
National Boulevard PM A A 0.001 No
*13 I-405 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & AM A B 0.088 No
National Boulevard PM A A 0.067 No
*14 Sepulveda Boulevard & AM F F 0.000 No
National Boulevard PM F F 0.001 No
15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM F F
Airport Avenue [a] PM C C
AM 0.009 No
PM -0.002 No
*17 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.026 Yes C -0.046 No
Airport Avenue PM D E 0.080 Yes D 0.034 Yes
18 Bundy Drive & AM F
Project Driveway [a] PM F
AM
PM
*19 Walgrove Avenue & AM F F -0.001 No
Rose Avenue PM F F -0.002 No
*20 Centinela Avenue & AM C C 0.002 No
Rose Avenue PM E E 0.001 No
*21 Walgrove Avenue & AM A A 0.003 No
Palms Boulevard PM C C 0.003 No
*22 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.007 No
Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No
*23 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM F F 0.001 No
Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.003 No
*24 Walgrove Avenue & AM E E 0.003 No
Venice Boulevard PM E E 0.003 No
*25 Beethoven Street & AM D D 0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM C C 0.001 No
*26 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F 0.000 No
*27 Inglewood Boulevard & AM D D -0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No
Inglewood Boulevard & AM C C -0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No
City of Santa Monica Methodology
Peak Delay or V/C Significant Delay or V/C Residual
Intersection Hour Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Impact? Delay V/C LOS Change Impact?
1 20th Street & AM 19 0.657 B 19 0.657 B 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 20 0.682 B 20 0.683 B 0 No
2 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 26 0.802 C 26 0.802 C 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 22 0.653 C 22 0.654 C 0 No
3 I-10 EB Off-Ramp/34th Street & AM 15 0.631 B 15 0.634 B 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 11 0.587 B 11 0.589 B 0 No
6 20th Street & AM 4 0.427 A 4 0.425 A 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM 18 0.702 B 18 0.701 B 0 No
7 23rd Street & AM 48 1.083 D 48 1.083 D 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM ** 1.374 F ** 1.353 F -0.021 No
8 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 5 0.479 A 5 0.479 A 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM 9 0.613 A 9 0.613 A 0 No
15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM ** N/C F ** N/C F 0 No
Airport Avenue [b] PM 17 N/C C 17 N/C C 0 No
16 Donald Douglas Loop South & AM 9 0.316 A 9 0.318 A 0 No
Airport Avenue [c] PM 8 0.259 A 8 0.280 A 0 No
17 Bundy Drive & AM 6 0.765 A 8 0.832 A 2 No 5 0.724 A -1 No
Airport Avenue PM 4 0.759 A 14 1.194 B 10 No 11 1.143 B 7 No
Notes:
* Intersection is currently operating under ATSAC system.
** Indicates oversaturated conditions. Delay cannot be calculated.
[a] Intersection is controlled by stop sign(s). The top rows show analysis using Highway Capacity Manual stop-controlled methodology, for the purpose of evaluating the
operating condition of the intersection. Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio. The bottom rows show analysis using the CMA
methodology, for the purpose of application of the City of Los Angeles significance criteria. V/C ratio is reported.
[b] Intersection is two-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the most constrained approach.
[c] Intersection is all-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle.
TABLE 25
FUTURE (2010) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - ALTERNATIVE C1
No Feasible Mitigation
17
1.090
Cumulative Base
Cumulative plus
Project
Cum+Project with
Mitigations
1.034 1.035
1.201 1.210
1.297 1.295
Cumulative Base
Cumulative plus
Project
Cumulative plus
Project
1.091
1.229 1.227
0.717 0.716
1.100 1.103
0.775 0.776
0.908
1.321 1.321
1.091
0.911
0.926 0.929
0.897 0.898
1.079 1.084
1.099 1.100
0.744 0.747
1.033 1.040
0.932 0.933
0.592 0.595
1.396 1.394
0.788 0.790
0.950
1.376 1.375
This intersection is consolidated with intersection #17**
0.826
0.823 0.849
0.855 0.935
** **
0.544
0.527 0.615
0.508 0.575
0.964
1.073 1.075
0.459 0.459
1.400
1.100 1.108
0.926 0.949
1.021
0.861 0.883
1.302 1.333
Delay or V/C
0.861 0.861
1.367 1.376
Delay or V/C
1.019
1.361
0.963
0.543
1.090
17
**
No Feasible Mitigation
Delay or V/C
0.777
0.889
0.867 0.866
1.229 1.227
Page III-82
City of Los Angeles Methodology
Peak V/C Significant V/C Residual
Intersection Hour LOS LOS Change Impact? LOS Change Impact?
*4 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.000 No
Pico Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No
*5 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.001 No
I-10 Freeway EB on-ramp PM D D 0.022 Yes
*9 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.031 Yes
Ocean Park Boulevard PM F F 0.039 Yes
*10 Bundy Drive & AM F F 0.008 No
National Boulevard PM E E 0.022 Yes
*11 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM E E 0.001 No
National Boulevard PM F F 0.002 No
*12 I-405 Freeway SB On-Ramp & AM A A 0.000 No
National Boulevard PM A A 0.001 No
*13 I-405 Freeway NB Off-Ramp & AM A B 0.088 No
National Boulevard PM A A 0.067 No
*14 Sepulveda Boulevard & AM F F 0.000 No
National Boulevard PM F F 0.001 No
15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM F F
Airport Avenue [a] PM C C
AM 0.011 Yes 0.009 No
PM 0.001 No 0.001 No
*17 Bundy Drive & AM D D 0.024 Yes C -0.046 No
Airport Avenue PM D E 0.071 Yes D 0.028 Yes
18 Bundy Drive & AM F
Project Driveway [a] PM F
AM
PM
*19 Walgrove Avenue & AM F F 0.005 No
Rose Avenue PM F F 0.005 No
*20 Centinela Avenue & AM C C -0.001 No
Rose Avenue PM E E -0.003 No
*21 Walgrove Avenue & AM A A 0.003 No
Palms Boulevard PM C C 0.003 No
*22 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.007 No
Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.005 No
*23 Sawtelle Boulevard & AM F F 0.001 No
Palms Boulevard PM F F 0.003 No
*24 Walgrove Avenue & AM E E 0.003 No
Venice Boulevard PM E E 0.003 No
*25 Beethoven Street & AM D D 0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM C C 0.001 No
*26 Centinela Avenue & AM F F 0.000 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F 0.000 No
*27 Inglewood Boulevard & AM D D -0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No
Inglewood Boulevard & AM C C -0.001 No
Venice Boulevard PM F F -0.002 No
City of Santa Monica Methodology
Peak Delay or V/C Significant Delay or V/C Residual
Intersection Hour Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Change Impact? Delay V/C LOS Change Impact?
1 20th Street & AM 19 0.657 B 19 0.657 B 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 20 0.682 B 20 0.683 B 0 No
2 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 26 0.802 C 26 0.802 C 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 22 0.653 C 22 0.653 C 0 No
3 I-10 EB Off-Ramp/34th Street & AM 15 0.631 B 15 0.633 B 0 No
Pico Boulevard PM 11 0.587 B 11 0.589 B 0 No
6 20th Street & AM 4 0.427 A 4 0.425 A 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM 18 0.702 B 18 0.701 B 0 No
7 23rd Street & AM 48 1.083 D 49 1.084 D 1 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM ** 1.374 F ** 1.368 F -0.006 No
8 Cloverfield Boulevard & AM 5 0.479 A 5 0.479 A 0 No
Ocean Park Boulevard PM 9 0.613 A 9 0.613 A 0 No
15 23rd Street/Walgrove Avenue & AM ** N/C F ** N/C F N/C Yes ** N/C F N/C No
Airport Avenue [b] PM 17 N/C C 17 N/C C 0 No 17 N/C C 0 No
16 Donald Douglas Loop South & AM 9 0.316 A 9 0.323 A 0 No
Airport Avenue [c] PM 8 0.259 A 9 0.296 A 1 No
17 Bundy Drive & AM 6 0.765 A 8 0.804 A 2 No 5 0.725 A -1 No
Airport Avenue PM 4 0.759 A 12 1.107 B 8 No 9 1.075 A 5 No
Notes:
* Intersection is currently operating under ATSAC system.
** Indicates oversaturated conditions. Delay cannot be calculated.
[a] Intersection is controlled by stop sign(s). The top rows show analysis using Highway Capacity Manual stop-controlled methodology, for the purpose of evaluating the
operating condition of the intersection. Average vehicular delay in seconds is reported rather than V/C ratio. The bottom rows show analysis using the CMA
methodology, for the purpose of application of the City of Los Angeles significance criteria. V/C ratio is reported.
[b] Intersection is two-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle for the most constrained approach.
[c] Intersection is all-way stop controlled. Level of service is based on average vehicular delay in seconds per vehicle.
TABLE 26
FUTURE (2010) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE - ALTERNATIVE C2
No Feasible Mitigation
Cumulative Base
Cumulative plus
Project
Cum+Project with
Mitigations
Delay or V/CDelay or V/C
0.861
Cumulative Base
Cumulative plus
Project
Cumulative plus
Project
0.861
1.367
0.926 0.948
0.964
1.019
1.361
0.963
1.302 1.333
1.400
1.100 1.108
1.372
1.020
0.861 0.883
1.075
0.459 0.459
0.5440.543
1.073
0.527 0.615
0.508 0.575
1.090
1.034 1.035
** **
1.090
17
0.823 0.847
0.855 0.926
1.201 1.212
1.297 1.298
17
**
0.826This intersection is consolidated with intersection #17
0.950
**
1.376 1.381
1.396 1.401
0.788 0.787
0.932 0.929
0.592 0.595
0.744 0.747
1.033 1.040
1.079 1.084
1.099 1.100
1.229 1.227
1.100 1.103
0.775 0.776
0.908 0.911
0.926 0.929
0.717 0.716
1.321 1.321
1.091 1.091
0.897 0.898
No Feasible Mitigation
Delay or V/C
No Feasible Mitigation
0.777
1.210
1.298
0.883
0.867 0.866
1.229 1.227
Page III-83
2010 CBAM
Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:
573A:
B: 199
216A:
B: 36
129
A:
B:
431
0.717 =
+
+
+++ 455431 19936
*1425
63
A:
B:
455
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBoundEastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
CLOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
129
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL 129
LANE
SIGNAL Perm
1
Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
431 85 36 138 42 199 1690 30 63 1274 90
199 301690421383685431 90127463
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:06:49 PMCalcaDB
CB_10_AM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Page III-84
2010 CBPM
Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:
227
A:
B:
695
134
A:
B:
944
384A:
B: 124
1.229 =
+
+
+++ 695944 88124
*1425
465A:
B: 88
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBoundEastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
FLOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
124
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL 124
LANE
SIGNAL Perm
1
Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
384 110 134 676 134 227 2032 54 88 1293 103
227 542032134676134110384 103129388
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:07:19 PMCalcaDB
CB_10_PM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Page III-85
Alternative A1 2010 CPAM
Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:
570A:
B: 199
216A:
B: 36
129
A:
B:
431
0.716 =
+
+
+++ 454431 19936
*1425
63
A:
B:
454
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBoundEastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
CLOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
129
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL 129
LANE
SIGNAL Perm
1
Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
431 85 36 138 42 199 1681 30 63 1272 90
199 301681421383685431 90127263
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:07:41 PMCalcaDB
A1_10_AM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Page III-86
Alternative A1 2010 CPPM
Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:
227
A:
B:
692
134
A:
B:
944
384A:
B: 124
1.227 =
+
+
+++ 692944 88124
*1425
464A:
B: 88
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBoundEastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
FLOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
124
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL 124
LANE
SIGNAL Perm
1
Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
384 110 134 676 134 227 2023 54 88 1289 103
227 542023134676134110384 103128988
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:07:59 PMCalcaDB
A1_10_PM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Page III-87
Alternative A2 2010 CPAM
Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:
570A:
B: 199
216A:
B: 36
129
A:
B:
431
0.716 =
+
+
+++ 454431 19936
*1425
63
A:
B:
454
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBoundEastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
CLOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
129
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL 129
LANE
SIGNAL Perm
1
Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
431 85 36 138 42 199 1681 30 63 1272 90
199 301681421383685431 90127263
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:08:13 PMCalcaDB
A2_10_AM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Page III-88
Alternative A2 2010 CPPM
Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:
227
A:
B:
692
134
A:
B:
944
384A:
B: 124
1.227 =
+
+
+++ 692944 88124
*1425
464A:
B: 88
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBoundEastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
FLOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
124
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL 124
LANE
SIGNAL Perm
1
Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
384 110 134 676 134 227 2023 54 88 1289 103
227 542023134676134110384 103128988
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:08:25 PMCalcaDB
A2_10_PM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Page III-89
Alternative A3 2010 CPAM
Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:
570A:
B: 199
216A:
B: 36
129
A:
B:
431
0.716 =
+
+
+++ 454431 19936
*1425
63
A:
B:
454
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBoundEastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
CLOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
129
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL 129
LANE
SIGNAL Perm
1
Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
431 85 36 138 42 199 1681 30 63 1272 90
199 301681421383685431 90127263
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:08:37 PMCalcaDB
A3_10_AM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Page III-90
Alternative A3 2010 CPPM
Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:
227
A:
B:
692
134
A:
B:
944
384A:
B: 124
1.227 =
+
+
+++ 692944 88124
*1425
464A:
B: 88
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBoundEastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
FLOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
124
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL 124
LANE
SIGNAL Perm
1
Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
384 110 134 676 134 227 2023 54 88 1289 103
227 542023134676134110384 103128988
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:08:51 PMCalcaDB
A3_10_PM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Page III-91
Alternative A4 2010 CPAM
Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:
570A:
B: 199
216A:
B: 36
129
A:
B:
431
0.716 =
+
+
+++ 454431 19936
*1425
63
A:
B:
454
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBoundEastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
CLOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
129
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL 129
LANE
SIGNAL Perm
1
Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
431 85 36 138 42 199 1681 30 63 1272 90
199 301681421383685431 90127263
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:09:03 PMCalcaDB
A4_10_AM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Page III-92
Alternative A4 2010 CPPM
Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:
227
A:
B:
692
134
A:
B:
944
384A:
B: 124
1.227 =
+
+
+++ 692944 88124
*1425
464A:
B: 88
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBoundEastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
FLOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
124
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL 124
LANE
SIGNAL Perm
1
Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
384 110 134 676 134 227 2023 54 88 1289 103
227 542023134676134110384 103128988
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:09:15 PMCalcaDB
A4_10_PM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Page III-93
Alternative A5 2010 CPAM
Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:
570A:
B: 199
216A:
B: 36
129
A:
B:
431
0.716 =
+
+
+++ 454431 19936
*1425
63
A:
B:
454
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBoundEastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
CLOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
129
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL 129
LANE
SIGNAL Perm
1
Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
431 85 36 138 42 199 1681 30 63 1272 90
199 301681421383685431 90127263
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:09:30 PMCalcaDB
A5_10_AM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Page III-94
Alternative A5 2010 CPPM
Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:
227
A:
B:
692
134
A:
B:
944
384A:
B: 124
1.227 =
+
+
+++ 692944 88124
*1425
464A:
B: 88
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBoundEastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
FLOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
124
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL 124
LANE
SIGNAL Perm
1
Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
384 110 134 676 134 227 2023 54 88 1289 103
227 542023134676134110384 103128988
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:09:44 PMCalcaDB
A5_10_PM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Page III-95
Alternative A6 2010 CPAM
Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:
570A:
B: 199
216A:
B: 36
129
A:
B:
431
0.716 =
+
+
+++ 454431 19936
*1425
63
A:
B:
454
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBoundEastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
CLOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
129
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL 129
LANE
SIGNAL Perm
1
Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
431 85 36 138 42 199 1681 30 63 1272 90
199 301681421383685431 90127263
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:09:55 PMCalcaDB
A6_10_AM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Page III-96
Alternative A6 2010 CPPM
Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:
227
A:
B:
692
134
A:
B:
944
384A:
B: 124
1.227 =
+
+
+++ 692944 88124
*1425
464A:
B: 88
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBoundEastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
FLOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
124
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL 124
LANE
SIGNAL Perm
1
Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
384 110 134 676 134 227 2023 54 88 1289 103
227 542023134676134110384 103128988
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:10:06 PMCalcaDB
A6_10_PM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Page III-97
Alternative A7 2010 CPAM
Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:
570A:
B: 199
216A:
B: 36
129
A:
B:
431
0.716 =
+
+
+++ 454431 19936
*1425
63
A:
B:
454
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBoundEastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
CLOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
129
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL 129
LANE
SIGNAL Perm
1
Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
431 85 36 138 42 199 1681 30 63 1272 90
199 301681421383685431 90127263
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:10:17 PMCalcaDB
A7_10_AM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Page III-98
Alternative A7 2010 CPPM
Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:
227
A:
B:
692
134
A:
B:
944
384A:
B: 124
1.227 =
+
+
+++ 692944 88124
*1425
464A:
B: 88
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBoundEastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
FLOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
124
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL 124
LANE
SIGNAL Perm
1
Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
384 110 134 676 134 227 2023 54 88 1289 103
227 542023134676134110384 103128988
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:10:28 PMCalcaDB
A7_10_PM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Page III-99
Alternative A8 2010 CPAM
Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:
570A:
B: 199
216A:
B: 36
129
A:
B:
431
0.716 =
+
+
+++ 454431 19936
*1425
63
A:
B:
454
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBoundEastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
CLOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
129
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL 129
LANE
SIGNAL Perm
1
Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
431 85 36 138 42 199 1681 30 63 1272 90
199 301681421383685431 90127263
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:10:40 PMCalcaDB
A8_10_AM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Page III-100
Alternative A8 2010 CPPM
Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:
227
A:
B:
692
134
A:
B:
944
384A:
B: 124
1.227 =
+
+
+++ 692944 88124
*1425
464A:
B: 88
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBoundEastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
FLOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
124
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL 124
LANE
SIGNAL Perm
1
Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
384 110 134 676 134 227 2023 54 88 1289 103
227 542023134676134110384 103128988
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:10:55 PMCalcaDB
A8_10_PM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Page III-101
Alternative A9 2010 CPAM
Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:
570A:
B: 199
216A:
B: 36
129
A:
B:
431
0.716 =
+
+
+++ 454431 19936
*1425
63
A:
B:
454
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBoundEastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
CLOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
129
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL 129
LANE
SIGNAL Perm
1
Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
431 85 36 138 42 199 1681 30 63 1272 90
199 301681421383685431 90127263
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:11:08 PMCalcaDB
A9_10_AM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Page III-102
Alternative A9 2010 CPPM
Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:
227
A:
B:
692
134
A:
B:
944
384A:
B: 124
1.227 =
+
+
+++ 692944 88124
*1425
464A:
B: 88
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBoundEastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
FLOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
124
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL 124
LANE
SIGNAL Perm
1
Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
384 110 134 676 134 227 2023 54 88 1289 103
227 542023134676134110384 103128988
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:11:24 PMCalcaDB
A9_10_PM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Page III-103
Alternative A10 2010 CPAM
Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:
570A:
B: 199
216A:
B: 36
129
A:
B:
431
0.716 =
+
+
+++ 454431 19936
*1425
63
A:
B:
454
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBoundEastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
CLOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
129
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL 129
LANE
SIGNAL Perm
1
Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
431 85 36 138 42 199 1681 30 63 1272 90
199 301681421383685431 90127263
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:11:36 PMCalcaDB
A10_10~1
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Page III-104
Alternative A10 2010 CPPM
Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:
227
A:
B:
692
134
A:
B:
944
384A:
B: 124
1.227 =
+
+
+++ 692944 88124
*1425
464A:
B: 88
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBoundEastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
FLOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
124
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL 124
LANE
SIGNAL Perm
1
Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
384 110 134 676 134 227 2023 54 88 1289 103
227 542023134676134110384 103128988
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:11:47 PMCalcaDB
A10_10~2
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Page III-105
Alternative B1 2010 CPAM
Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:
570A:
B: 199
216A:
B: 36
129
A:
B:
431
0.716 =
+
+
+++ 454431 19936
*1425
63
A:
B:
454
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBoundEastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
CLOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
129
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL 129
LANE
SIGNAL Perm
1
Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
431 85 36 138 42 199 1681 30 63 1272 90
199 301681421383685431 90127263
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:12:01 PMCalcaDB
B1_10_AM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Page III-106
Alternative B1 2010 CPPM
Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:
227
A:
B:
692
134
A:
B:
944
384A:
B: 124
1.227 =
+
+
+++ 692944 88124
*1425
464A:
B: 88
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBoundEastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
FLOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
124
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL 124
LANE
SIGNAL Perm
1
Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
384 110 134 676 134 227 2023 54 88 1289 103
227 542023134676134110384 103128988
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:12:15 PMCalcaDB
B1_10_PM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Page III-107
Alternative B2 2010 CPAM
Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:
570A:
B: 199
216A:
B: 36
129
A:
B:
431
0.716 =
+
+
+++ 454431 19936
*1425
63
A:
B:
454
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBoundEastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
CLOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
129
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL 129
LANE
SIGNAL Perm
1
Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
431 85 36 138 42 199 1681 30 63 1272 90
199 301681421383685431 90127263
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:12:29 PMCalcaDB
B2_10_AM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Page III-108
Alternative B2 2010 CPPM
Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:
227
A:
B:
692
134
A:
B:
944
384A:
B: 124
1.227 =
+
+
+++ 692944 88124
*1425
464A:
B: 88
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBoundEastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
FLOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
124
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL 124
LANE
SIGNAL Perm
1
Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
384 110 134 676 134 227 2023 54 88 1289 103
227 542023134676134110384 103128988
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:12:41 PMCalcaDB
B2_10_PM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Page III-109
Alternative B4 2010 CPAM
Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:
570A:
B: 199
216A:
B: 36
129
A:
B:
431
0.716 =
+
+
+++ 454431 19936
*1425
63
A:
B:
454
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBoundEastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
CLOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
129
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL 129
LANE
SIGNAL Perm
1
Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
431 85 36 138 42 199 1681 30 63 1272 90
199 301681421383685431 90127263
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:12:53 PMCalcaDB
B4_10_AM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Page III-110
Alternative B4 2010 CPPM
Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:
227
A:
B:
692
134
A:
B:
944
384A:
B: 124
1.227 =
+
+
+++ 692944 88124
*1425
464A:
B: 88
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBoundEastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
FLOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
124
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL 124
LANE
SIGNAL Perm
1
Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
384 110 134 676 134 227 2023 54 88 1289 103
227 542023134676134110384 103128988
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:13:09 PMCalcaDB
B4_10_PM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Page III-111
Alternative C1 2010 CPAM
Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:
570A:
B: 199
216A:
B: 36
129
A:
B:
431
0.716 =
+
+
+++ 454431 19936
*1425
63
A:
B:
454
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBoundEastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
CLOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
129
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL 129
LANE
SIGNAL Perm
1
Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
431 85 36 138 42 199 1681 30 63 1272 90
199 301681421383685431 90127263
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:13:21 PMCalcaDB
C1_10_AM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Page III-112
Alternative C1 2010 CPPM
Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:
227
A:
B:
692
134
A:
B:
944
384A:
B: 124
1.227 =
+
+
+++ 692944 88124
*1425
464A:
B: 88
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBoundEastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
FLOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
124
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL 124
LANE
SIGNAL Perm
1
Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
384 110 134 676 134 227 2023 54 88 1289 103
227 542023134676134110384 103128988
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:14:58 PMCalcaDB
C1_10_PM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Page III-113
Alternative C2 2010 CPAM
Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:
570A:
B: 199
216A:
B: 36
129
A:
B:
431
0.716 =
+
+
+++ 454431 19936
*1425
63
A:
B:
454
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBoundEastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
B(W/B)
A(N/B)
A(E/B)
B(S/B)
CLOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
129
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL 129
LANE
SIGNAL Perm
1
Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
431 85 36 138 42 199 1681 30 63 1272 90
199 301681421383685431 90127263
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:15:16 PMCalcaDB
C2_10_AM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Page III-114
Alternative C2 2010 CPPM
Inglewood Boulevard Venice BoulevardN/S: W/E: 27I/S No:
AM/PM: Comments:
COUNT DATE: GROWTH FACTOR:STUDY DATE:
227
A:
B:
692
134
A:
B:
944
384A:
B: 124
1.227 =
+
+
+++ 692944 88124
*1425
464A:
B: 88
V/C =
West/East Critical Movements =
North/South Critical Movements =
SouthBound
WestBoundEastBound
NorthBound
A = Adjusted Through/Right VolumeB = Adjusted Left Volume* = ATSAC Benefit
Results
V/C RATIO LOS
0.00 - 0.60 A
0.61 - 0.70 B
0.71 - 0.80 C
0.81 - 0.90 D
0.91 - 1.00 E
A(W/B)
B(N/B)
B(E/B)
A(S/B)
FLOS =
Critical Movements Diagram
TH RT LT THLT TH RT LT TH RT
Phasing RTOR Phasing Phasing PhasingRTOR RTOR
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
EXISTING
RTOR
RT
124
AMBIENT
RELATED
PROJECT
TOTAL 124
LANE
SIGNAL Perm
1
Perm Prot-Fix Prot-FixAuto Auto Auto Auto
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0
LT
384 110 134 676 134 227 2023 54 88 1289 103
227 542023134676134110384 103128988
Volume/Lane/Signal Configurations
Developed by Chun Wong, 12/94
December 21, 2006 ,Thursday 03:15:31 PMCalcaDB
C2_10_PM
INTERSECTION DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Page III-115
Santa Monica Community College January 26, 2007
SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report Page III-116
In response to Comment Nos. 7.12, 8.4, 23.3, 26.1, 26.14, 26.17, and 28.1, Table 8 of the Traffic Study (Appendix G to the Draft EIR) has been corrected to no longer indicate that the trip generation estimates shown for Airport Park include the removal of the former SMC shuttle lot as no such adjustment was made in the traffic analysis. This does not change any findings or conclusions contained within the Draft EIR.
In response to Comment No. 5.25, Table 8 has also been amended to include the Madison Campus. It should be noted that because the traffic impact analysis for the Madison Campus estimated that it would generate only nominal traffic during the typical peak periods (six trips in the a.m. peak hour and 13 trips in the p.m. peak hour) and its location is approximately four miles from the site of the Bundy Campus, the addition of the Madison Campus to Table 8 of the Traffic Study does not change any of the findings or conclusions of the Draft EIR.
The revised Table 8 of the Traffic Study has been included on the following pages of this Section.
TAB
LE 8
TRIP
GEN
ERA
TIO
N E
STIM
ATE
S FO
R R
ELA
TED
PR
OJE
CTS
IN T
HE
CIT
Y O
F SA
NTA
MO
NIC
A
SPIRT
YA
DKEE
WPI
RTETI LAN
DD
ISC
OU
NT
AVE
RA
GE
USE
FAC
TOR
DA
ILY
A.M
. PEA
K H
OU
RP.
M. P
EAK
HO
UR
ED
OC
EZISES
UN
OITA
COL
TCEJ
ORP
[b]
TRIP
SIN
OU
TTO
TAL
INO
UT
TOTA
L
Cur
rent
Cum
ulat
ive
Proj
ects
with
in S
anta
Mon
ica
(per
12/
16/2
005
City
Lis
t)
Fast
Foo
d/R
etai
l/Offi
ce15
402n
d S
treet
mix
ed u
se re
plac
emen
t of
exi
stin
g M
cDon
alds
731801
9299
3168
059)ten(
RIE
morfF
SK
16
5-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
1032
3rd
Stre
etco
ndom
iniu
m5
DU
230
129
02
22
13
5-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
1048
-50
3rd
Stre
etco
ndom
iniu
m5
DU
230
129
02
22
13
5-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
947
4th
Stre
etco
ndom
iniu
m5
DU
230
129
02
22
13
75-U
nit M
ixed
-use
Bui
ldin
g15
394t
h S
treet
resi
dent
ial
75D
U22
01
504
830
3831
1647
5-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
914
5th
Stre
etco
ndom
iniu
m5
DU
230
129
02
22
13
5-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
944
5th
Stre
etco
ndom
iniu
m5
DU
230
129
02
22
13
Ret
ail/R
esid
entia
l12
415t
h S
treet
resi
dent
ial
49D
U22
01
325
421
2520
1030 01
55
31
2021
1028
FS
K3
liater
Ret
ail/R
esid
entia
l13
215t
h S
treet
resi
dent
ial
16D
U22
01
106
17
87
310 3
21
10
193
1028
FS
K1
liater
Ret
ail/R
esid
entia
l13
245t
h S
treet
resi
dent
ial
48D
U22
01
318
420
2420
1030
Mul
ti Fa
mily
Res
iden
tial
1410
5th
Stre
etap
artm
ent b
uild
ing
56D
U22
01
371
524
2923
1235 01
55
31
2901
5.0028
FS
K5
l iater
Page
III-
117
TAB
LE 8
TRIP
GEN
ERA
TIO
N E
STIM
ATE
S FO
R R
ELA
TED
PR
OJE
CTS
IN T
HE
CIT
Y O
F SA
NTA
MO
NIC
AM
ulti
Fam
ily R
esid
entia
l14
205t
h S
treet
apar
tmen
t bui
ldin
g50
DU
220
133
24
2226
2110
31 53
21
01
165.0
028F
SK
3l iater
Mul
ti Fa
mily
Res
iden
tial
1437
5th
Stre
etap
artm
ent b
uild
ing
26D
U22
01
172
211
1311
516
Mul
ti Fa
mily
Res
iden
tial
1442
5th
Stre
etap
artm
ent b
uild
ing
50D
U22
01
332
422
2621
1031 5
32
10
116
5.0028
FS
K3
liater
Mul
ti Fa
mily
Res
iden
tial
1450
5th
Stre
etap
artm
ent b
uild
ing
56D
U22
01
371
524
2923
1235 7
43
21
138
5.0028
FS
K4
liater
Mul
ti Fa
mily
Res
iden
tial
1548
5th
Stre
etap
artm
ent b
uild
ing
46D
U22
01
305
419
2319
1029
Mul
ti Fa
mily
Res
iden
tial
1234
6th
Stre
etap
artm
ent b
uild
ing
48D
U22
01
318
420
2420
1030 3
21
10
153
5.0028
FS
K2
liater
Mul
ti Fa
mily
Res
iden
tial
1244
6th
Stre
etap
artm
ent b
uild
ing
50D
U22
01
332
422
2621
1031
Mul
ti Fa
mily
Res
iden
tial
1411
7th
Stre
etap
artm
ents
52D
U22
01
345
423
2721
1132 4
22
10
124
5.0028
FS
K2
l iater
Mul
ti Fa
mily
Res
iden
tial
1418
7th
Stre
etap
artm
ent
48D
U22
01
318
420
2420
1030 3
21
10
153
5.0028
FS
K2
liater
Mul
ti Fa
mily
Res
iden
tial
1427
7th
Stre
etap
artm
ent
50D
U22
01
332
422
2621
1031
17-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
1544
7th
Stre
etco
ndom
iniu
m17
DU
from
CE
(net
)1
00
00
00
0
8-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
2510
7th
Stre
etco
ndom
iniu
m8
DU
230
147
14
53
14
5-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
839
9th
Stre
etco
ndom
iniu
m5
DU
230
129
02
22
13
5-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
1027
10th
Stre
etco
ndom
iniu
m5
DU
230
129
02
22
13
Page
III-
118
TAB
LE 8
TRIP
GEN
ERA
TIO
N E
STIM
ATE
S FO
R R
ELA
TED
PR
OJE
CTS
IN T
HE
CIT
Y O
F SA
NTA
MO
NIC
A5-
Uni
t Con
dom
iniu
m17
5010
th S
treet
cond
omin
ium
5D
U23
01
290
22
21
3
5-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
1038
11th
Stre
etco
ndom
iniu
m5
DU
230
129
02
22
13
5-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
911
12th
Stre
etco
ndom
iniu
m5
DU
230
129
02
22
13
15-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
1211
12th
Stre
etap
artm
ents
15D
U22
01
991
78
63
9 013
78
71
6011
0 22U
D61
s tnemtrapa
teertS
ht212561
la itnediseR 5-
Uni
t Con
dom
iniu
m91
414
th S
treet
cond
omin
ium
5D
U23
01
290
22
21
330
-Uni
t Apa
rtmen
t15
1115
th S
treet
apar
tmen
t30
DU
220
119
92
1315
136
19
10-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
838
16th
Stre
etco
ndom
iniu
m10
DU
230
159
13
43
25
6-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
1415
16th
Stre
etco
ndom
iniu
m6
DU
230
135
12
32
13
5-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
1520
16th
Stre
etco
ndom
iniu
m5
DU
230
129
02
22
13
5-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
1537
16th
Stre
etco
ndom
iniu
m5
DU
230
129
02
22
13
11-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
1803
16th
Stre
etco
ndom
iniu
m11
DU
230
164
14
54
26 5
23
43
135
1022
UD
8laitnedise r
teer tS
ht71809
noisividbuStin
U-8 5-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
1105
18th
Stre
etco
ndom
iniu
m5
DU
230
129
02
22
13 4
13
33
004
1022
UD
6laitnediser
teertS
ht817291
noisividbuStin
U-6 5-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
811
19th
Stre
etco
ndom
iniu
m5
DU
230
129
02
22
13
5-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
838
19th
Stre
etco
ndom
iniu
m5
DU
230
129
02
22
13 3
12
33
033
1032
UD
5la itn edise r
teer tS
h t91158
nois ivid buStin
U-5 8-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
917
19th
Stre
etco
ndom
iniu
m8
DU
230
147
13
43
14 3
12
33
033
1022
UD
5laitn ediser
teer tS
ht915301
nois ividbuStin
U-5
31
23
30
331
022U
D5
lai tnediserteert
Sht91
8102nois ividbu
Sti nU-5 5-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
923
20th
Stre
etco
ndom
iniu
m5
DU
230
129
02
22
13
101-
Uni
t Res
iden
tial
1671
20th
Stre
etre
side
ntia
l10
1D
U22
01
670
844
5242
2163
5-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
1120
21st
Stre
etco
ndom
iniu
m5
DU
230
129
02
22
13
Page
III-
119
TAB
LE 8
TRIP
GEN
ERA
TIO
N E
STIM
ATE
S FO
R R
ELA
TED
PR
OJE
CTS
IN T
HE
CIT
Y O
F SA
NTA
MO
NIC
A5-
Uni
t Con
dom
iniu
m20
1321
st S
treet
cond
omin
ium
5D
U23
01
290
22
21
3
74 3,1798
0541 91,1
35 3838
A/N
1RI
Emo rf
)R I
Emorf(
teertS
dn228231
N/A
(70)
(38)
(108
)(3
1)(6
8)(9
9)N
/A83
835
41,
192
450
898
1,34
810
-Uni
t Con
dom
iniu
m25
1228
th S
treet
cond
omin
ium
10D
Ufro
m C
E (n
et)
10
00
00
00
Mul
ti Fa
mily
Res
iden
tial
1751
App
ian
Way
apar
tmen
t14
DU
220
193
16
76
39
Ret
ail/R
esid
entia
l43
0A
rizon
a A
ve.
resi
dent
ial
39D
U22
01
259
317
2016
824 41
77
42
2651
5.0028
FS
K7
liater
0301
0252
124
5231
022U
D94
lai tnediser. ev
Aano zi r
A505
la itnediseR
919
0111
38
4511
026U
D56
sdeB
56.ev
Aanozi r
A1311
ytilicaFs're
miehzlA 7-
Uni
t Con
dom
iniu
m21
7B
ickn
ell
cond
omin
ium
7D
U23
01
411
23
31
4
Mul
ti Fa
mily
Res
iden
tial
606
Bro
adw
ayre
side
ntia
l50
DU
220
133
24
2226
2110
31co
mm
erci
al6
KS
F82
00.
512
72
13
56
11 0301
0242
024
8131
022U
D84
s tnemt rapa
yawdao r
B626
laitnediseR ap
artm
ent/o
ffice
1424
Bro
adw
ayap
artm
ent/o
ffice
7D
U22
01
461
34
31
4
32-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
1502
Bro
adw
ayco
ndom
iniu
m32
DU
230
118
82
1214
116
17
Mul
ti Fa
mily
Res
iden
tial
1906
Bro
adw
ayre
side
ntia
l32
DU
230
118
82
1214
116
17 21
10
00
911
028F
SK
0liater ex
istin
g si
gn s
hop
3K
SF
140
-1(1
0)(2
)0
(2)
(1)
(1)
(2)
8-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
1311
Cen
tinel
a A
ve.
cond
omin
ium
8D
Ufro
m C
E (n
et)
10
01
10
00
lano it iddafo.f.s004,13
dv lB
dleif revolC
7071ega rot
Sse
lf-st
orag
e8
44
52
30
1F
SK
13
16-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
1940
Clo
verfi
eld
Blv
dco
ndom
iniu
m16
DU
230
194
16
76
39
bus
mai
nten
ance
bld
g.40
KS
F ne
tfro
m E
IR1
342
75
123
710 51
312
612
41.cni
58 .0R I
Emor f
FS
K8
eci ffo
5-st
ory
Mix
ed-u
se B
uild
ing
525
Col
orad
oap
artm
ent
38D
U22
01
252
316
1916
824
St.
John
s M
edic
al C
ente
r &
Mas
ter P
lan
Tran
spor
tatio
n Fa
cilit
y M
aste
r Pla
nC
olor
ado
to n
orth
, 7th
to e
ast,
5th
to
wes
t, O
lym
pic
to s
outh
Page
III-
120
TAB
LE 8
TRIP
GEN
ERA
TIO
N E
STIM
ATE
S FO
R R
ELA
TED
PR
OJE
CTS
IN T
HE
CIT
Y O
F SA
NTA
MO
NIC
Anoisnapx
Esup
maC
odaro loC
2 16su
Beul
Bg i
B 26-U
nit A
fford
able
H
ousi
ng71
1C
olor
ado
Ave
.ap
artm
ents
26D
U22
01
172
211
1311
516
Mul
ti Fa
mily
Res
iden
tial
2834
Col
orad
oap
artm
ent
145
DU
220
196
112
6274
6030
90 618
88
44
502RI
Emorf
erca4
krapyt ic
noisnapxE
k raPtropri
A04
0103
5351
02522
RIE
morferca
1krap
god66
8382
00
0891
RIE
morferca
1dleif
noitaercer rem
ove
exis
ting
San
ta
Mon
ica
Col
lege
shu
ttle
lot
-310
spac
es(9
46)
(66)
(6)
(72)
(32)
(57)
(89)
Euc
lid P
ark
Nea
r 152
5E
uclid
15 K
SF
park
0.34
acre
San
DA
G1
171
01
10
1
Lant
ana
Sou
th31
31E
xpos
ition
ente
rtain
men
t pos
t pr
oduc
tion
99K
SF
from
EIR
(net
)1
1,45
418
826
214
2914
217
1
5-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
1243
Fran
klin
cond
omin
ium
5D
U23
01
290
22
21
3
6-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
2015
Idah
o A
venu
eco
ndom
iniu
m6
DU
230
135
12
32
13 704
22358
106021
184A/
NRI
Emorf
secaps588
secapsgnikrap
wen.t
Snia
M5861
)704()223 (
)58()106(
)021 ()18 4(
A/N
R IE
mor fsecaps
588-gni tsixe
morft fihs32
2111
62
4862
5 .0028
FS
K5 .21
liat er
2012
-202
4M
ain
St.
apar
tmen
t10
7D
U22
01
709
946
5544
2266
2012
-202
4M
ain
St.
spec
ialty
reta
il12
KS
F81
40.
525
00
00
79
1620
21-2
029
Mai
n S
t.ap
artm
ents
26D
U22
01
172
211
1311
516
2021
-202
9M
ain
St.
spec
ialty
reta
il7
KS
F81
40.
513
30
00
35
8
44-U
nit A
partm
ents
, 100
%
Affo
rdab
le22
09M
ain
Stre
etaf
ford
able
apa
rtmen
ts44
DU
220
129
24
1822
189
27
212
Mar
ine
Stre
etm
ulti-
fam
ily re
side
ntia
l24
DU
from
EIR
114
12
911
94
13co
mm
erci
al9
KS
F82
00.
519
33
25
89
17
Priv
ate
Hig
h S
choo
l22
30M
ichi
gan
Ave
high
sch
ool
15K
SF
530
118
731
1344
86
14
5-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
1719
Oce
an F
ront
Wal
kco
ndom
iniu
m5
DU
230
129
02
22
13
Mira
mar
Dev
elop
men
t A
gree
men
t11
33O
cean
Ave
nue
Hot
el 2
00 R
oom
s20
0R
oom
s31
081 1
5536
21144
861
Spe
cial
ty R
etai
l12
KS
F81
40.
526
78
513
2019
39Q
ualit
y R
esta
uran
t7
KS
F93
10.
525
21
12
147
21312
3120
3120
3121
FS
K01
eca lP
gn ite eM
Don
ald
Dou
glas
Loo
p to
nor
th,
Airp
ort A
v. to
sou
th, B
undy
Dr.
to
east
San
ta M
onic
a C
ivic
Cen
ter
Par
king
Stru
ctur
e
Nor
th M
ain
(Pio
neer
B
aker
y S
ite)
24-U
nit M
ixed
Use
Pro
ject
Page
III-
121
TAB
LE 8
TRIP
GEN
ERA
TIO
N E
STIM
ATE
S FO
R R
ELA
TED
PR
OJE
CTS
IN T
HE
CIT
Y O
F SA
NTA
MO
NIC
AH
ill S
treet
Par
tnrs
D
evel
opm
ent A
gree
men
t13
27-1
337
Oce
an A
venu
eH
otel
75
Roo
ms
75R
oom
s31
01
613
2616
4223
2144
Res
taur
ant
3K
SF
932
140
519
1837
2114
35
3025
Oly
mpi
c B
lvd.
apar
tmen
t18
6D
U22
01
1,23
315
8095
7738
115
cond
omin
ium
54D
U23
01
316
420
2419
1029
spec
ialty
reta
il5
KS
F81
40.
510
20
00
33
6
Lant
ana
Eas
t30
30O
lym
pic
Blv
d.en
terta
inm
ent p
ost
prod
uctio
n64
KS
Ffro
m E
IR (n
et)
151
368
1078
1260
72
791001
79844
181762
939,1)ten(
RIE
morfF
SK
511loo hcs
e tavirp.dvl
Bc ip
mylO
1313sdao
Rwe
N Aut
o D
eale
rshi
p E
xpan
sion
3300
Oly
mpi
c B
lvd.
auto
dea
lers
hip
9.6
KS
F84
10.
518
08
311
58
13
9-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
125
Pac
ific
Stre
etco
ndom
iniu
m9
DU
230
153
13
43
25
5-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
126
Pac
ific
Stre
etco
ndom
iniu
m5
DU
230
129
02
22
13
18-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
1112
Pic
o B
lvd
cond
omin
ium
18D
U23
01
105
17
87
310
8-un
it C
ondo
min
ium
1528
-30
Prin
ceto
nco
ndom
iniu
m8
DU
230
147
13
43
14
May
fair
Thea
ter
212
San
ta M
onic
a B
lvd
apar
tmen
t38
DU
220
125
23
1619
168
24 819
95
23
8025.0
028F
SK
01lia ter
Affo
rdab
le H
ousi
ng26
01S
anta
Mon
ica
Blv
dap
artm
ent b
uild
ing
44D
U22
01
292
418
2218
927
Mix
ed-U
se B
uild
ing
3107
San
ta M
onic
a B
lvd
apar
tmen
t bui
ldin
g10
DU
220
166
14
54
26 32
2111
62
4462
5.0028
FS
K21
liater
Pro
duct
ion/
Live
Wor
k B
ldg.
1818
Sta
nfor
d S
treet
com
mer
cial
bui
ldin
g34
KS
F71
00.
8531
840
545
736
43
1630
Ste
war
tpr
oduc
tion
offic
e9
KS
F71
00.
8588
112
132
1012
resi
dent
ial
10K
SF
220
163
14
54
26
12-U
nit C
ondo
min
ium
2121
Virg
inia
Ave
cond
omin
ium
12D
U23
01
701
45
42
6
Mul
ti-Fa
mily
Res
iden
tial
507
Wils
hire
50 re
side
ntia
l50
DU
230
129
34
1822
189
27 6442
2231
58
5.0F
SK
5laicre
mmocfs
153,5
Mix
ed-u
se B
uild
ing
Pro
duct
ion
Offi
ce/R
esid
entia
l
Page
III-
122
TAB
LE 8
TRIP
GEN
ERA
TIO
N E
STIM
ATE
S FO
R R
ELA
TED
PR
OJE
CTS
IN T
HE
CIT
Y O
F SA
NTA
MO
NIC
A
7524
5108
2285
6951
RIE
morf)
RIE
morf(3
21
51
433
1RI
Emorf
)RI
Emorf(
32
15
14
331
RIE
morf)
RIE
morf(
San
ta M
onic
a P
ier B
ridge
&
Pie
r Ram
pS
anta
Mon
ica
Pie
r/Col
orad
o A
v.w
iden
pie
r brid
ge &
co
nstru
ct ra
mp
to
PC
H14
40/1
550
Lot
(n
ote:
pro
ject
wou
ld n
ot g
ener
ate
new
trip
s bu
t wou
ld c
hang
e ex
istin
g ac
cess
pat
tern
s to
the
1550
PC
H p
arki
ng lo
t)
630,1216
424224
07253
c/nsecaps
217,1tcartn oc
dna rotisivgnikr a
Pn
wot nwo
DM
Spa
rkin
g
894461
433804
44346
503,5022
UD
008laitnedise
Rot
ociP,htron
otodarolo
Ccificep
SretneC
civiC
931511
42541
71821
420,1017
FS
K39
eciffO
tsew
otnaec
O,tsaeot
ht4,htuosnal
P021
6546
9431
63903,1
0 28/138F
SK
52l ia te
R /tnarua tseR
071431
63452
15302
337,2RI
Emorf
FS
K00 1
gnidliuB
eciv reS
y tiC
6161
042
042
143RI
Emorf
FS
K02
noisnapxE
muirotiduA
56178
87951
5748
199565
FS
K5.21
retn eC
doohdl ihC
ylraE
7 572
033 8
1424
046RI
Emorf
ecrA
8.21kra
P33
9141
10
166
RIE
morfdleiF
1dleiF recco
S Inte
rnal
& N
on-A
uto
Adj
.(5
24)
(19)
(6)
(24)
(21)
(31)
(51)
SM
C M
adis
on T
heat
er13
1011
th S
treet
live
thea
ter
314
96
15
097RI
Emorf
staes005
TOTA
L: C
UR
RE
NT
SA
NTA
MO
NIC
A P
RO
JEC
TS38
,284
3,89
12,
613
6,50
53,
301
4,43
37,
735
Sou
rces
: C
ity o
f San
ta M
onic
a, D
ecem
ber 1
6, 2
005
and
"Dra
ft E
nviro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct R
epor
t for
the
Mad
ison
The
ater
Pro
ject
" (C
hris
toph
er A
. Jos
eph
& A
ssoc
iate
s, M
arch
7, 2
003)
.
Wils
hire
to n
orth
, Col
orad
o to
so
uth,
5th
to e
ast,
2nd
to w
est
San
ta M
onic
a/U
CLA
H
ospi
tal
Wils
hire
to n
orth
, Ariz
ona
to s
outh
, 16
th to
eas
t, 15
th to
wes
t
Page
III-
123
Santa Monica Community College January 26, 2007
SMC Bundy Campus Master Plan III. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR Final Environmental Impact Report Page III-124
In response to Comment No. 26.11, the first sentence of the second paragraph on page 27 of Appendix G (Traffic Study) to the Draft EIR has been corrected to read as follows:
“The segment of Airport Avenue westeast of Centinela Avenue is treated as a collector street in this study, which is consistent with previous studies of projects in the area.”
This correction does not change any findings or conclusions contained within the Draft EIR.
In response to Comment No. 28.3, the fourth sentence of the last paragraph on page 27 of Appendix G (Traffic Study) to the Draft EIR has been corrected to read as follows:
“That traffic volume, as well as the physical characteristics of the street itself (i.e., its grade), is such that typical neighborhood traffic calming measures — such as those applied on Rose Avenue westeast of Bundy Drive and on 23rd Street north of Ocean Park Boulevard (stop signs and speed humps) — are not considered appropriate.”
This correction does not change any findings or conclusions contained within the Draft EIR.