IAEAInternational Atomic Energy Agency
BASIC IRRS TRAININGLecture 15
Reviewing Regulatory Aspects of Emergency Preparedness
and Response
IAEA 2
Outline
• Learning objectives• Introduction• Functions of Regulatory Body (RB) on EPR• Appraisal guidance:
• Part 1: Appraisal of RB’s EPR regulations and regulatory processes
• Part 2: Appraisal of RB’s response capabilities
Basic IRRS Training - Reviewing Emergency Preparedness and Response
IAEA 3
Learning objectives
After finishing this lecture the trainee will:• Understand IRRS Module 10
(EPR)• Know what is included in the
review of the regulatory aspects of Emergency Preparedness and Response (EPR)
• Be familiar with the questions and issues to be considered for interviews and discussions with the RB representatives
Basic IRRS Training - Reviewing Emergency Preparedness and Response
IAEA 4
Introduction
Basis for review - IAEA Safety Standards:
• GSR Part 1 (Requirement 8)• Governmental, Legal and Regulatory
Framework for Safety (2010) (referenced 7 times during missions in the period 2006-2011)
• GSR Part 3• Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation
Sources: International Basic Safety Standards - INTERIM EDITION (2011)
• GS-R-2• Preparedness and Response for a Nuclear
or Radiological Emergency (2002) (referenced 63 times during missions in the period 2006-2011)
Basic IRRS Training - Reviewing Emergency Preparedness and Response
IAEA 5
Introduction (cont’d)
Regulatory bodies have a dual role
• REGULATOR
• To regulate, authorize and control facilities and activities in the nuclear field
• RESPONSE ORGANIZATION • To provide advice and expert
services on EPR at national level• To coordinate with the National
EPR system
Basic IRRS Training - Reviewing Emergency Preparedness and Response
IAEA 6
As an EPR regulator:
• Establish regulations• EPR requirements for the licensees• The RB does not usually have jurisdiction on non-licensees
• But “The RB shall ensure that [..] emergency arrangements are integrated with those of other response organizations [and..] that the co-ordinated arrangements are implemented adequately by the operators [..]” (GS-R-2)
• Authorize• Establish an authorization system• Provide reasonable assurance that adequate EPR
arrangements are in place for all licensees • Verify
• Establish an inspection system• Check the compliance of EPR arrangements with legal
requirements for all licensees• Including the systematic evaluation of some exercises
Basic IRRS Training - Reviewing Emergency Preparedness and Response
IAEA 7
As a response organization:
• Preparedness• Provide support to and coordinate with other competent
authorities in the preparedness and planning phase• Response
• Advise the government and competent authorities• Provide expert services
• As stipulated in the national emergency response framework
• This role may vary from MS to MS
Basic IRRS Training - Reviewing Emergency Preparedness and Response
IAEA 8
APPRAISAL OF EPR REGULATIONS AND REGULATORY PROCESS
Basic IRRS Training - Reviewing Emergency Preparedness and Response
IAEA 9
Regulatory framework
• The RB• Develops regulations• Authorizes licensee’s EPR arrangements• Verifies
• The RB’s mandate is usually limited to licensees• Other authorities usually set and maintain requirements for the national
emergency response framework• The RB is not usually the national co-ordinating authority for EPR
• Therefore, co-ordination with those other authorities on EPR regulatory or legislative matters is required• Regulatory responsibilities of the RB on EPR matters must be clear• Coordination mechanisms and processes to ensure comprehensive coverage
of all EPR requirements and consistent approaches in areas of overlapping jurisdiction• For example on the protection of emergency workers
Basic IRRS Training - Reviewing Emergency Preparedness and Response
IAEA 10
The RB develops EPR regulations
• The EPR regulations issued by the RB should be complete and consistent with GS-R-2• Within the scope of the RB’s jurisdiction
• Unless otherwise stated in the legal framework, this normally covers the responsibility of the operator for on-site and off-site areas under its direct control and the interface with other competent authorities
• The regulatory body should coordinate with other competent authorities in regulatory areas not under its direct jurisdiction
Basic IRRS Training - Reviewing Emergency Preparedness and Response
IAEA 11
Recommendation of Experienced Reviewers
Give particular attention to:GS-R-2: General requirements
For each GS-R-2 general, functional and infrastructure requirement:
Does the RB have regulatory responsibility for that requirement?
If yes, is there a regulatory requirement or guide on this, and is it consistent with GS-R-2 and associated guidance?
If no, who is responsible for that requirement and how does the RB coordinate with them?
If overlapping jurisdiction for that requirement, how is coordination effected and final regulatory decisions made?
Recommendation of Experienced Reviewers
Give particular attention to:
Basic IRRS Training - Reviewing Emergency Preparedness and Response
IAEA 12
Recommendation of Experienced Reviewers
Give particular attention to:
Basic IRRS Training - Reviewing Emergency Preparedness and Response
Requirement Regulatory jurisdiction of the RB
National Reference
Consistent with int’l requirements?
Remarks
Basic responsibilities
Note that not all these areas apply to operating organizations to the same extent. For example, the RB is not usually responsible for establishing the responsibilities of other governments organizations involved in EPR; the RB is also often not the organization responsible for establishing requirements for informing the public.
Assessment of threat
Emergency management and operations
Identifying, notifying and activating
Urgent protective actions
Information and instructions
Protecting emergency workers
Assessing initial phase
Medical response
Agricultural and longer term countermeasures
Non-radiological impacts
Recovery
Authority
Organization
Coordination
Plans and procedures
Logistics
Training, drills and exercises
QA
IAEA 13
The RB authorizes EPR arrangements
• The applicant normally submits its Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan• As part of the application for the authorization• Documents should cover preparedness processes (sustainability)
and response arrangements (actions)• “Preparedness” and “Response” are not always in the same
document
• The RB evaluation should be systematic, complete and consistent• This suggests the need for an evaluation methodology and standard
• Graded approach• The extent and depth of the regulatory evaluation should be
commensurate with the radiation risks
Basic IRRS Training - Reviewing Emergency Preparedness and Response
IAEA 14
Recommendation of Experienced Reviewers
Give particular attention to:
How are EPR arrangements evaluated?• Those documented in the licensee’s EPR plan• Those documented in the other plans?
• Note that the RB does not necessarily have jurisdiction over those
• Against what regulatory guide or standard?• Is there a systematic methodology?• How is the interface between the licensee and other authorities for
EPR evaluated?
How does the RB coordinate with other competent authorities for the evaluation of common areas?• For example, readiness of emergency services that may support
the operator during an emergency?
Basic IRRS Training - Reviewing Emergency Preparedness and Response
IAEA 15
The RB verifies
• Verification is normally through:• Inspections (plans, equipment, systems, facilities)• Audits (of the EPR preparedness process, training
programme and records, etc.)• Exercises
• There should be a process in place• Procedures and standards• Regulatory guides• Etc.
• Graded approach• The extent of the regulatory control should be
commensurate with the radiation risksBasic IRRS Training - Reviewing Emergency Preparedness and Response
IAEA 16
Recommendation of Experienced Reviewers
Give particular attention to:
What is the verification process? Look for:• EPR inspection and audit schedule, methodology, procedures and
records• Past inspection and audit reports• Periodic review of the hazard assessment
Check if the inspections and audits cover all relevant regulatory areas• Refer to the section/Table on regulations• Note that the verification method might vary between EPR
requirements• For example, equipment “inspection” vs training programme “audit”
Basic IRRS Training - Reviewing Emergency Preparedness and Response
IAEA 17
Recommendation of Experienced Reviewers
Give particular attention to:
How are exercises evaluated? • Is there a standard methodology?• Is it consistent with EPR Exercises 2005?• Check exercise reports, corrective actions and trends
• If an operator has an exercise, evaluate how the RB evaluates it
• How often are exercise evaluated by the regulator?
How does the RB ensure the continued harmonization of licensee EPR arrangements with those of local response organizations?
How does the RB monitor continuous improvement in EPR?
Basic IRRS Training - Reviewing Emergency Preparedness and Response
IAEA 18
Note: big difference between Hazard Categories (I to III), and IV• I to III have a “site operator” and off-site authorities• IV do not
• Response by local emergency services may NOT be within the RB’s jurisdiction
• But emergency plans by source owners are
Basic IRRS Training - Reviewing Emergency Preparedness and Response
Recommendation of Experienced Reviewers
Give particular attention to:
IAEA 19
APPRAISAL OF RB’s RESPONSE CAPABILITY
Basic IRRS Training - Reviewing Emergency Preparedness and Response
IAEA 20
Legislative framework
• Legislative framework defines the role of the RB• Roles and responsibilities of the RB in preparedness
and response should be clearly defined• As a minimum, the RB provides advice and expert
services• Additional roles possible depending on Member State• The RB must have the capabilities and meet the
infrastructure requirements that apply to these roles• The RB coordinates
• Coordination focused on preparedness and response of the national system
• Within the “limited” jurisdiction of the RB
Basic IRRS Training - Reviewing Emergency Preparedness and Response
IAEA 21
Examples of possible response roles
• Notification point• Consequence assessment• Advice on:
• Facility status, evolution and prognosis• Protective actions for workers and public
• Public information• Radiation monitoring• On-scene response (hazard category IV)
• In many MS, the RB does not actively respond at the scene• In some, they do
• Again, the response role varies between various MS• The IRRS review of the response capabilities of the RB must reflect
the MS-specific roles
Basic IRRS Training - Reviewing Emergency Preparedness and Response
IAEA 22
Recommendation of Experienced Reviewers
Give particular attention to:
What is the extent of the RB role during response? Does the RB have the tools, systems, capabilities and training to
fulfill this role? Does the RB exercise this role on a regular basis? Do exercises cover all interfaces, with other response and
operating organizations? Check training and exercise records
• Check records and reports• Look for corrective action plans and continuous improvement• If they have an exercise, review the way they evaluate themselves
Basic IRRS Training - Reviewing Emergency Preparedness and Response
IAEA 23
Summary (Module 10 EPR)
• Module 10 is based on GSR Part 1, GSR Part 3 and GS-R-2• The RB is both a regulator and a response organization• Module 10 (EPR) focuses on:
• Completeness of the EPR regulations• Effectiveness of the regulatory approval process for EPR• Effectiveness of the regulatory verification process for EPR• Coordination with other authorities in setting EPR requirements• Ability of RP to perform its assigned response functions
• Graded approach: regulatory control in EPR commensurate with radiation risk
• IRRS module 10 (EPR) must recognize the limits of the RB’s jurisdiction in EPR
Basic IRRS Training - Reviewing Emergency Preparedness and Response
IAEA 24
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION
Basic IRRS Training - Reviewing Emergency Preparedness and Response
Photo: V. Friedrich
This activity is conducted by the IAEA, with funding by the European Union. The views expressed in this presentation do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission
IAEA 25
Discussion
• Since the RB does not have jurisdiction over all EPR aspects, how do we establish which EPR requirements from GS-R-2 apply, and to what extent?
• Is it the RB’s responsibility to verify that off-site emergency preparedness and response arrangements are adequate?
Basic IRRS Training - Reviewing Emergency Preparedness and Response