Transcript
Page 1: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

How GM Technology Compares with Other Breeding Techniques

Kevin M. FoltaProfessor and Chairman

Horticultural Sciences Department

kfolta.blogspot.com@kevinfolta

[email protected]

Page 2: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

Everyone Loves New Technology

Page 3: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

What Plant Genetic Improvement Is

More varieties

Grow better under given conditions

Improved yields

Page 4: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

What Plant Genetic Improvement Is

People t hink

Improved yields

Page 5: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

Where Do Improved Traits Come From?

Breed it in from a wild population

Directly transfer the related gene(s)(GMO)

Damage DNA with radiation or chemicals; look for good traits

Page 6: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

Methods of Plant Genetic Improvement

What are the major ways we genetically improve varieties?Major methodsSome common examplesStrengths / limitations

How do they compare to each other?

The future of plant genetic improvement, barley

How to talk to the public about genetic improvement methods

Page 7: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

Dispelling the Naturalistic Fallacy– This is Nothing New!

Remind audiences that genetic improvement of food is a continuum.

Almost none of the plants we regularly consume originated in North America. Almost all were brought here by humans.

None of the food you eat is like its “natural” form

GM technology is simply the most precise version of an age-old practice of breeding and selection.

Page 8: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

Humans have always manipulated crop genetics

Page 9: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques
Page 10: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

Inbreeding

Decreases useful production traits

Lower heterozygousity

Page 11: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

Non-specific crosses

Combining the desirable traits from two genetic backgrounds into one.

Problem: Linkage drag

Requires many backcosses to “clean up” genetics

Can require a long time

No regulatory issues

X =

IRRI Images

Page 12: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

Wide genetic crosses

Integrating traits from wild relatives into elite varieties

Problem: with every “good” gene, you move thousands of “bad” genes.

Solution (+/-) marker-assisted breeding

Page 13: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

Marker-Assisted Breeding

Association between the likelihood of inheriting a trait and a certain sequence of DNA

- + + + + + + - + + + + + - - +

Mara

Ely

an

a

Pla

nt

5

Pla

nt

2

Pla

nt

4

Pla

nt

16

Pla

nt

8

Pla

nt

14

Pla

nt

1

Pla

nt

3

Pla

nt

9

Pla

nt

6

Pla

nt

12

Pla

nt

11

Pla

nt

13

Pla

nt

7

Pla

nt

17

Pla

nt

18

Pla

nt

19

Wate

r

Page 14: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

Marker-Assisted Breeding

Association between the likelihood of inheriting a trait and a certain sequence of DNA

Rad

ian

ce

Deu

tsch

Evern

Flo

rid

a b

elle

Tre

asu

re

Fest

ival

LF9

Alb

ion

Cam

aro

sa

Win

ter

Sta

r

Mon

treal

Earl

ibri

te

Mie

ze S

chin

dle

r

Sw

eet

Ch

arl

ie

Win

ter

Daw

n

Cam

ino

Do

ver

61

25

01

61

24

98

61

24

95

61

23

23

61

23

20

55

17

36

61

24

99

23

65

79

Page 15: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

Wide genetic crosses

North America

Chile

Page 16: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

Crossing the Impossible

Bridging Crosses- when the desired cross is not possible, finding a sexually-compatible plant, creating the interspecific hybrid, and then crossing the progeny to the other parental genotype.

Embryo Rescue

Fertilization takes place, but embryo is not viable for normal germination.

If given the proper conditions, the embryo can germinate and mature into a plant.

Page 17: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

Hybrids between inbreds

B73 Mo17

Iowa Sate Univ photo

Produce plants from inbreeding that are highly homozygous

Cross two inbreds together and get tremendous heterozygousity

Page 18: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

Hybrids between inbreds

Page 19: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

Polyploids

Increased numbers of genomes in a cell

Can be natural or induced

Examples:

Beans, potato, strawberry, wheat, brassicas, many others

Page 20: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

Polyploids

Increased numbers of genomes in a cell

Seedlessness

Wheat breeding

Page 21: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

Mutation Breeding

All genetic variation begins with mutation

Mutations can be induced with ionizing radiation or chemicals

May require backcrossing

High lycopene

Seedlessness

Page 22: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

Somatic Fusions

Page 23: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

Everything I’ve shown so far is Everything I’ve shown so far is completely acceptable to the completely acceptable to the

public. public.

No labels, no warnings, no No labels, no warnings, no special regulation.special regulation.

Page 24: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

Transgenics

What people usually think of as “GMO”

Addition of a gene, or small number of genes

Page 25: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

Transgenics

Can add traits from across species (like the Bt gene for insect resistance)

Can suppress traits or viruses using RNAi (as in the papaya and potato)

Page 26: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

GM Crops Available Now

9

potato

Page 27: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

What are the Three Main Traits?

Virus Resistance

Insect Resistance

Herbicide Resistance

(how the traits work lecture online – (google “ UF biotechnology literacy day”)

Page 28: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

Strengths Limitations

Virus resistance Works great, no foreign material

Has cut insecticide use by 10-70%

Saves time, labor, fuel. Allows conservation tillage

Can spread to nonGM populations

Pockets of developing resistance

Resistant weeds are a problem in areas.

Insect resistance

Herbicide resistance

Page 29: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

Transgenic Traits May be Stacked into a Single Background

Page 30: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

Cisgenics/Intragenics

Transfer of specific genes from the same species

Cis-genic = as-is

Intra-genic = all ‘native’ sequence with some re-arrangement

Page 31: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

Cisgenics/Intragenics

Apple Scab

Traditional breeding introduced resistance gene from M. floribunda over 50 years.

Same sequence added by Dutch researchers in <5.

Page 32: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

Gene Editing

CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short pallindromic repeats)

Targeted, few collateral effects

Allows production of custom mutations

Reasonably fast and efficient

No foreign genes present

Page 33: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

GE vs. Traditional Breeding

Wide crosses exchange hundreds or thousands of genes and gene variants; GE moves only one/few.

Traditional breeding frequently uses plants that could never normally cross, GE uses genes from self or any other organism

GE can monitor the effect of a specific change; breeding seeks to judge the effect on plant productivity and does not address possible effects on individual genes.

Page 34: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

How can these genetic improvement tools be applied to barley?

A number of traits have relevance to your industry.

-- genes can be added to improve fungal tolerance

-- genes that degrade beta-glucan linkages can be silenced

-- genes can be suppressed to obtain a more compact growth habit

-- genes can be added that will help plants yield consistently during water deficit

-- genes can be added to increase protein content

Page 35: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

Talking to public audiences – Get Involved!

Plant genetic improvement techniques are safe.

All methods involve some small risk– but all are about the same risk as traditional breeding.

Techniques that breed in traits can take a long time

Directed changes are more precise and more rapidly available, but frequently require regulatory hurdles

Page 36: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

You are the solution.

Farmers are 1.5% of the population, yet are ~0.001% of the presence in social media.

People are interested in food and farming

They look to social media for answers

Farmers consistently are rated as most credible sources of information

Page 37: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

You are the solution.

Jennie Schmidt

Brian Scott

Sarah Schultz

Page 38: How GMO Technology Compares to Other Crop Improvement Techniques

Thank you

kfolta.blogspot.com@kevinfolta

[email protected]


Recommended