Highly Effective Ciclopriox Olamine Temperature-Induced
In Situ Gel for Oral Thrush
Jaya raja kumar*1.K,Jayachandran.E2, Selvadurai Muralidharan1 and Sokkalingam Arumugam Dhanaraj1 1Faculty of Pharmacy, AIMST University, Semeling, Bedong,Malaysia
2S.C.S College of pharmacy, Harapanahalli (KA) India
Abstract: The endeavor of this study was the formulation and assessment of a novel temperature-induced and mucoadhesive in situ gel delivery system, which can be used in the treatment of oral thrush. A mucoadhesive polymer was used as a thermo responsive material, because pluronic 188 and carbomer 934 has thermal gelation properties at certain temperature. The thermal gelation temperature 15% w/w pluronic 188 and carbomer 934 1% w/w solutions is above body temperature, but by using different ratio of pluronic and carbomer combination of system, it can be shifted near to body temperature. The optimized formulations were evaluated for gelling capacity, viscosity, gel strength, mucoadhesive force, drug release, anti fungal activity, FTIR, DSC and XRD. Keyword: Prolong Release, Ciclopriox olamine, pluronic 188, Carbomer 934, temperature induced, Oral Thrush
INTRODUCTION
Oral candidiasis (also known as "thrush"1) is an infection of yeast fungi of the genus Candida on the mucous membranes of the mouth. It is frequently caused by Candida albicans, or less generally by Candida glabrata or Candida tropicalis. Candida species are everywhere, human fungal pathogens capable of initiating a variety of recurring superficial diseases especially in the oral and vaginal mucosa 2,3. In the late 1950s there was a progressively increasing number of reports on superficial Candida infections associated with the administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics such as tetracycline 4,5. In subsequent years, the broad use of steroids, immunosuppressive agents in organ
transplant recipients6,7 myeloablative radiation therapy8,9,10, and antineoplastics in patients with hematologic malignancies11,12,13 contributed to the increasing morbidity associated with Candida. More lately, mucosal Candida infections have received profuse attention due to the advent of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. For instance, it is now known that up to 90% of HIV-infected individuals suffer from oropharyngeal candidiasis14 Even though the clinical efficacy of systemic antifungal treatment is well established, the potency is decreased by thousand fold when reaches the target site, and also large dose and/or prolonged administration is often necessary to maintain an effective drug concentration. The long-term use of systemic antifungal drugs is associated with potential adverse effects and patient non-compliance and also less drug availability at the site of infection, limits its use. In such condition a safe and effective
local route of drug delivery device, which will reduce the dose and increase the concentration of drug in the oral cavity with low systemic concentration is highly desirable. Hence, attention has been focused on extended released topical antifungal formulations aimed at prolonging active drug concentrations in the oral cavity. Using appropriate carriers, which can effectively administer the drug for an extended period of time will reduce the systemic side effect but also improve the therapeutic efficacy and patient compliance.
MATERIAL AND METHOD: Material: pluronic 188 were kindly gifted by pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd, (Bombay). Ciclopriox olamine was used as a standard drug from Glenmark, India. All other chemical used were of analytical grade. Method: Thermo reversible gels were prepared using cold technique. The method involved slow addition of polymers in required quantity of cold distilled water further it was kept overnight for swelling. The polymer solution was taken in a beaker stirred continuously using a magnetic stirrer until a uniform solution was obtained and it was kept at ambient temperature for 24 hrs. A small amount of triethanolamine was added to adjust the pH 7. An appropriate amount of selected drugs solubilized in physiologically compatible solvents with continuous stirring until a uniform drug solution was obtained. The detailed composition of prepared formulation is depicted in Table- 1
Jaya raja kumar et al /J. Pharm. Sci. & Res. Vol.4(2), 2012, 1716--1723
1716
Table1.Composition of Temperature induced formulation code RR
EVALUATION OF IN SITU GEL Determination of pH: The pH of the gel was determined using a calibrated pH meter. The readings were taken for average of 3 samples15 Gelling capacity: The gelling capacity was determined by placing a drop of the system in a vial containing 2 ml of simulated saliva fluid (7.4) freshly prepared and equilibrated at 37⁰ C and visually assessing the gel Formation and noting the time for gelation and the time taken for the gel formed to dissolve. Different grades were allotted as per the gel integrity, weight and rate of formation of gel with respect to time15. Gelation temperature: The different formulations of in situ system combinations were evaluated for gelation temperature. The gelation temperature was determined by heating the solution (1-2o C) min in a test tube with gentle stirring until gel was formed. The gel was said to have formed when there was no flow after container was overturned16.
Viscosity Studies: The rheological studies were carried out using Brookfield programmable DVII+ Model pro II type (USA). The viscosity of in situ gel and the solution were determined at different angular velocities (0, 10, 20, 30, 40….to 100 rpm) and average of two reading were used to calculate the viscosity. Spreadability:
For the determination of spreadability, excess of sample was applied in between two glass slides and was compressed to uniform thickness by placing 1000g weight for 5 min. weight (50 g) was added to the pan. The time in which the upper glass slide moves over to the lower plate was taken as measure of spreadability17 (S) S= ML/T Where, M = weight tide to upper slide (g) L = length moved on the glass slide (cm) T = time taken (sec)
Figure -1.Diagramatic representation of
spreadability measuring device.
Measurement of Gel Strength: A sample of 50 gm of gel was placed in a 100 ml graduated cylinder and gelled in a thermostat at 370
C. The apparatus for measuring gel strength (apparatus as shown in figure 23 weighing 27 gm) was allowed to penetrate in gel. The gel strength, which means the viscosity of the gels at physiological stimuli was determined by the time (seconds), the apparatus took to sink 5cm down through the prepared gel18
(A)Weights (B) device (C) measuring cylinder (D) gel
Figure - 2.Diagramatic representation of gel strength measuring device.
Determination of Mucoadhesive Force:
The mucoadhesive force of all the optimized batches was determined as follows, a section of mucosa was cut from the chicken cheek portion and instantly fixed with mucosal side out onto each glass vial using rubber band. The vial with chicken cheek mucosa was connected to the balance in inverted
Slide 2
Slide 1
50g
Weight1000 g
Gel
Ingredients (w/w) % RR 1 RR 6 RR 7 Cicloprioxolamine 1 1 1 Pluronic 188 15 15 15 Carbomer 934 --- 0.03 0.04 Alcohol q.s q.s q.s Citric Acid 0.18 0.18 0.18 Triethanolamine q.s q.s q.s Cold. Distilled Water q.s q.s q.s
Jaya raja kumar et al /J. Pharm. Sci. & Res. Vol.4(2), 2012, 1716--1723
1717
position adjustabmucosa of simulKH2PO4
adjustedof the tewas so vials comcontact the pan was thevials. TmeasureDetachmWhere grams; g980 cm/
(A) (D) Gel ( Figure -
DiffusioChickenchicken house anstored gentamygrowth15
Assembstudies:The diff(2.38 gmNaCL in7.4).Thedimensiothe mag
while firstble pan. Oral
of first vial.lated saliva s4 and 8 g Nad to pH 7.4) west membraneadjusted thame in intimawas given. until vials ge
e minimum The cheek mement17. ment stress (dm is the wg is the acce/s2; and A is t
Modified Bal(E) mucous m
-3.Diagramaforce
on across then cheek muc
which was ond was cleanin normal
ycin sulphat5.
bly of diffus
ffusion medim Na2HPO4
n 1000 ml oe oral diffusion given. Thgnetic stirrer
t vial was pl gel was ad Before appl
solution (2.38acl in 1000 mwas evenly se. Then the hat the mucosate contact. TThen weighet detached. weight requ
mucosa was
dynes/cm2) =weight addedeleration duethe area of ti
lance,(B) weigmembrane (f) H
atic representmeasuring d
e chicken chosa was isolobtained fromned to remov
saline wite injection,
sion cell-for
ium used wa4, 0.19 gm of distilled wion cell was he diffusion rs. The out
placed on added onto thelying the gel8 g Na2HPOml of distillespread on theheight of secsal surfaces Two minutesht was kept r
Mucoadhesiuired to detas changed f
= m g/A d to the bale to gravity issue exposed
ght (C) Glass vHeight adjusta
tation of bioadevice
heek mucosalated from am the local sve blood cellith few dr
to avoid b
r in vitro d
as phosphatKH2PO4 an
water adjustedesigned as
cells were plet of the r
a height e buccal l, 150µL 4, 0.19 g ed water e surface cond vial
of both s time of rising in ive force ach two for each
lance in taken as d.
vial
able pan
adhesive
a: a healthy slaughter s. It was rops of bacterial
diffusion
e buffer nd 8 gm ed to pH s per the laced on reservoir
mjTTmecbswAicrcc
CTtcmigwwsda7mw(
maintained aacket of diff
The receptoThen the prmounted on entrapment ocontact of mby placing itstirring was kwith the helpAliquots of intervals of ocompartmentreceptor fluicondition. Tcontent was d
Figure - 4.dus
Content UniTests for conthe preparedcontaining fomin19. One into 100 ml graduated Piwas added. Twith the helshaking untdispersed to adjusted to 7.4.Obtainedmicron filterwas determin(Shimadzu U
at 37±0.50C afusion cell usr compartmrepared chic
the cell caof air bubble mucosa was
t tightly witkept constan
p of micropipsamples w
one hour fromt and same id solution
The samples determined a
diagramatic rsed for findin
iformity
ntent uniformd gel formuormulation wml of the fvolumetric
ipette. 50 mlThe formed lp of glass til the formgive clear s100 ml w
d solution wr membrane ned by UV
UV1700, Japa
and was consing rubber l
ment was filcken cheek arefully so a
under the mensured withth clamp. Th
nt throughoutpette.
were withdram sampling volume wasin order towere withd
as per the abo
representationg diffusion s
mity were caulations. Thwere properlyformulation
flask with l of simulategel was comroad followmed gel gsolution. Finwith simulawas filteredand the druVisible spe
an)
nnected to watex tubes. lled with flu mucosa w
as to avoid mucosa. Intimh receptor flhe speed of t the experim
awn at tport of receps replaced w
o maintain sdrawn and dove procedur
on of apparatstudy
arried out fore vials (n y shaken for was transfer1 ml calibra
ed saliva pH mpletely crus
ed by vigorgets complenal volume wated saliva d through 0ug concentratectrophotome
water
uid. was the
mate fluid
the ment
time ptor with sink drug re.
tus
r all =3) 2-3
rred ated 7.4
shed rous tely was pH
0.45 tion eter.
Jaya raja kumar et al /J. Pharm. Sci. & Res. Vol.4(2), 2012, 1716--1723
1718
RESULT AND DISSCUSSION Physicochemical properties of ciclopiroxolamine in situ gels Physicochemical properties such as viscosity, pH, appearance and clarity were performed and the results are recorded in Table -2. Table- 2: Physicochemical Evaluation of optimized ciclopriox Solution:
Tests RR1 RR6 RR7 visual appearance
*** *** ***
clarity *** *** *** pH 6.8 6.9 7.0 Viscosity (Cps)
43.11 49.34 50.05
Gelation temperature GT of temperature induced in situ gels decreased with increase in concentration of Pluronic188 in RR1, RR2, RR3 and RR4 at 35.5°C, 34.2°C, 25.1°C and 23.4°C respectively. By adding with Pluronic188 in increasing ratio (15:0.03), (15:0.04), (15:0.05) an increase in gelation temperature has occurred in the formulations RR5, RR6 and RR7 to 28.3°C, 35.6°C and 36.5°C respectively. The Pluronic188 concentration was optimized at 15%. The buccal gel prepared with Pluronic188 (15%) with in RR8, RR9, RR10 and RR11 (0.1% to 0.4%) increased the GT (42.2°C to 60.2°C). Since RR1, RR6 and RR7 showed gelation at a temperature near to body temperature, they have been selected as optimized formulae for further studies (Fig-5).
Figure -5. Showing the Viscosity versus
temperature curves of cicloprioxolamine In situ gel Viscosity Study The optimized formulations RR1, RR6 and RR7 exhibited an increase in viscosities (31943, 47830, 48750 Cps) at body temperature. But the other
formulations (RR8, RR9, RR10 and RR11) have not exhibited an increase in viscosity at body temperature which may be due to the increasing concentration of polymers (0.1 to 0.4) (Fig- 5) Gelation time The gelation time of ciclopirox olamine formulations RR1(15%), RR6 (15%:0.04%) and RR7(15%:0.05%) demonstrated gel-like rheologic properties at 35.5°C, 34.60C and 36.50C depending on the percentage of P188/CP 934. whereas the formulation RR1 with 15% of P188 showed gelation within 43 sec .The gelation time of solutions containing P188/ CP 934 K6 (15/0.02), K7(15/0.03) was observed at 35 sec. and 34 sec,. This effect may be due to increased concentration of in the formulation. Every addition of (0.1% w/w CP 934) into the formulations leads to 50C increase in gelation temperature (Table- 3). Table -3.Characteristics of optimized cicloprioxin situ Gel FormulationsRR code
For
mu
lati
on
Vis
cosi
ty
(Cp
s)
% d
rug
con
ten
t (w
/w)
Mu
coad
hes
ive
forc
e (d
ynes
/cm
2 )
Gel
st
ren
gth
(sec
.)
Gel
atio
n
Cap
acit
y
Gel
atio
n
Tim
e (s
ec.)
RR1 31943 97.5 3673.12 108 *** 43 RR6 47830 98.7 4801.14 112 *** 35 RR7 48750 98.7 4992.06 116 *** 34
Content Uniformity All the optimized formulation of ciclopirox olamine (RR1, RR6, and RR7) was checked for their content uniformity. The content was determined at 298 nm, which is of drug using Shimadzu 1700UV-VIS spectrophotometer. Gel Strength At 37°C, the gel strength of formulation RR6 (112 sec) was found to be more as compared to formulation RR1 (108 sec) and gel strength of formulation RR7 (116 sec) which was found to be more as compared to the other formulations This may be due to reversible gelation properties of Pluronic at 37°C (Table- 3) Determination of mucoadhesive force Adhesive properties of Pluronic188 formulations increased with the increase in concentration of in formulations RR6 (P188 15% w/w: CP 934 0.02% w/w) (4801.14 dynes/cm2) and RR7 (P188 15% w/w: CP 934 0.03% w/w).(4992.06 dynes/cm2).. Whereas the formulation RR1 which contains only Pluronic (P188 10%) showed less viscosity (3673.12 dynes/cm2) (Table-3)
Jaya raja kumar et al /J. Pharm. Sci. & Res. Vol.4(2), 2012, 1716--1723
1719
In vitro The perthrough period owas fourespectivRR1 waPluronicrate owchannel.RR6, RRto presepropertieDrug RThe corrrelease mechaniolamineranged fmore th0.990 toranged fthat RpredomiThe forgood in diffusiondrug relkorsmeyvalues wunderstofollowindiffusion
%CDR
F
Release Sturcentage ofC
chicken chof 8 hrs from und to be vely. The difas less whicc188 in the g
wing to redu. While diffuR7 was founence of , wes (Fig-5) elease Kinetrelation coeffollowed d
ism from t, as the valufrom 0.991
han that of o 0.991. The from 0.990 t
RR code inantly zero ormulations R vitro releasn mechanismlease mechanyer-peppas ewere in the rood that Rng predominn mechanism
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
% CDR
Figure -5. Sh
udies: Ciclopiroxolaheek mucous
formulation78.5%, 81
ffusion of drch may be
gel which retauction in dusion of drugnd to be morwhich underg
tics fficient ‘r’ indiffusion conthe in situ ue of ‘r’ forto 0.993 anfirst order value of ‘r’
to 0.991. It wformulation
order releaseRR1, RR6 se kinetics wm. More ovenism the da
exponential mrange of 0.0RR code nantly zero
m of drug rele
0.5 1
howing the D
amine drug s membrane
n RR1, RR6 a1.4% and rug from formdue to presards the drug
dimension og from formre which maygoes rapid
ndicated that ntrolled zer
gel of Cir zero order nd also founwhich rangefor Higuchi
was clearly in were foe and RR7 ewith fickian r to compreh
ata were fittmodel where055 to 0.057formulationorder and
ease (Table-
1.5 2
Diffusion of R
diffused e over a and RR7 86.6 % mulation sence of g release of water mulations y be due swelling
the drug ro order iclopirox
kinetics nd to be ed from kinetics
ndicated ollowing
exhibited type of
hend the ed in to e the ‘n’ 7. It was ns were
fickian 4)
TO
Z
F
H
k
FTwsaifs
2.5 3Time in hou
RR Code- op
Table -4. ReOrder of proce
Zero order
First order
Higuchi
korsmeyer
FTIR SpectrThe ciclopirwhere as it said compouactivity afterin the struformulated wsatisfactorily
3.5 4urs
ptimized form
elease kineticess RR1
R² 0.9M -0.0C 2.0R² 0.9M 6.0C -0.9R² 0.9M 6.0C -0.9R² 0.9M 0.0C 1.2
ra rox has greais made for
und absorptior making foructure. Cicwith Pluroni
y (Table-5), (
Figure -6.
5 6
mulation
cs of RR Cod1 RR991 0.99046 -0.05053 2.06991 0.99029 6.47926 -0.2991 0.99029 6.47926 -0.2966 0.94057 0.05293 1.33
ater intensityrmulation wion decrease, m without glopriox olaic188 and R(Fig- 6)
FTIR spectr
7 8
de formulatioR6 RR792 0.9953 -0.0666 2.1191 0.9974 6.8515 0.3691 0.9974 6.8516 0.3649 0.9657 0.0536 1.37
y in absorptith Pluronicstill it retains
getting disturamine can RR formulat
ra
RRIRR6RR7
on 7 3
66 1
9 4 1
9 4 1 5 5 6
tion the
s its rbed
be tion
Jaya raja kumar et al /J. Pharm. Sci. & Res. Vol.4(2), 2012, 1716--1723
1720
Table -5
Compound cm-1
Ciclopriox olamine
Pluronic188
Pluronic188+
Pluronic188+
Ciclopriox Olamine
DSC SpCiclopircharacte124.15°Cshowed 240˚C.Tof cicloshowed The DSpolymer57.63 ºThereforthe form(Fig- 7)
5. FTIR spec
CH
stretching cm-1
U
2960
+ 2960
+
2960
m
pectra: roxolamine eristic endothC and 157.8
endothermThe DSC theopiroxolaminpeaks at 57.
SC thermogr combinatioºC. The Plre, Pluronicamulation of
Figur
ctra Unsaturated
nitrogen compound
cm-1
P
poas
1653 C-C Multiple
Bond Streaching
1653 C-C multiple bond
streaching
showed a hermic peak83ºC. The D
mic peak bermograms one with an63 ºC, 193.4
grams of phon showed enluronic188 and may be uf ciclopiroxo
re -7. DSC sp
Poloxamar/1120 cm
C-O olymeric ssociated
CH2
CH
CO
1380 132
1380 132
long andk at 110.67 DSC thermobetween 16of physical mnd grades o46 ºC and 24hysical mixtndothermic ppeaks at 6used as excipolaminein si
pectra
m-1 cm-1
2 - H3
O
OH CO
20
20 1140
clu
d sharp ºC and
gram of 60°C to mixtures of P188 42.05 ºC. tures of peaks at 62.96°C, pients in itu gels.
XTs1spwc2wcf
C-C multiple
bond stretchin
g cm-1
OOH
0-1720 uster
XRD SpectrThe X-ray dishowed the d19.95 θ andshowed a peapeak at 15.9was observecombination 23.35 θ, Thewhich may crystalline fformulations
Corboxlateanion cm-1
1460
1467
ra: iffractogram
distinct peaksd other peaak at betwee
95 θ, the pead at 19.3 θwith drug
ere was a slbe due the
form to a (Fig-8)
Figure - 8
Ar-N-tertiary
vibration cm-1
Cvibra
cm
1380
LE
1280
12
ms of pure cics at between ak at 23.5 en 22 θ to 23ak of polymand 23.35 θwas peak aight reductio
e conversionamorphous
.XRD spectr
CN ation
m-1
OH bending cm-1
ESS
720
280
720
clopiroxolam11.65 θ, 17.θ, Pluronic
3 θ and showmer combinatθ, The polymat 19.15 θon in peak len of drug fr
form in
ra
free OH cm-1
3650
3458
mine 5 θ, 188 wed tion mer and evel
from the
Jaya raja kumar et al /J. Pharm. Sci. & Res. Vol.4(2), 2012, 1716--1723
1721
AntifunThe antdeterminvarious situ gelsmg).It winhibitio0.9 cm- cm- 3.1 10).
Figin
Figuinhib
Table 6compariCandida
In situ gel
standard
ngal activity:tifungal actined by agaconcentratios (MIC: 0.1was observeon for standa
2.7 cm, whcm for the
ure -9.Photonhibition of c
ure -10.Photobition of cicl
6: Antimicroison to a Albican
0.125 mg
0m
1.7 2
0.9
: ivity of cicar diffusion ons of standa25, 0.25, 0.d from the
ard solutions hereas it was
in situ gels
ography showcicloprioxola
ography sholoprioxolami
obial activitreference
0.25 mg
0.5 mg
2.0 2.4
1.5 1.9
lopiroxolammethod by
ard solutions.5, 1.0, 2.0 results the were in the
s in the rang(Table- 6),
wing the zonamine standar
wing the zoninein situ sys
ty of in situstandard
1.0 mg
2.0mg
2.6 2.8
2.1 2.3
mine was y taking s and in and 4.0 zone of range of
ge of 1.7 (Fig. 9-
ne of rd
ne of stem
u gel in using
0 g
4.0 mg
8 3.1
3 2.7
S
GgcfRggaaamimpTfd0cimdcRafPrwfmudtgmcTtsso
R[
[
[
[
SUMMARY A
Gelation temgels of ciclopconcentrationfor a conceRR4).The gegels will supgels before administratioand RR7 (11among all omay due to inits reversibmucoadhesivparameter ofThe mucoadhfrom 3673dynes/cm2 fo0.03% of Cconcentrationincreased. Thmucoadhesivdiffusion stucheek membRR7 releasedat the end oformulation RPluronic 188release rate water channformulation Rmay be dueundergoes rdiffusion. Ththe optimizegels followemore over tconfirmed thThe preparatthe reversiblsitu gels witsitu gels fororal thrush.
REFERENCE[1] James, W
(2006). AnDermatolo
[2] Odds, F. Cbibliograph
[3] SamaranaycandidosisCommenta
[4] Knight, Lalbicans in
AND CONCLU
mperature of piroxolaminen of Pluronicentration ofel strength ipport a muchthey are wa
on. The gel s12, 116 sec) optimized Rncrease in co
ble gelationve force is anf topical aphesive force .12 dynes/or the formuarbomer andn of mucoadhis also provve property udies condubrane from thd 78.5%, 81.of 8thhour.TRR1 was les8 in the geowing to r
nel. While RR6, RR7 w
e to presencrapid swellhe value of red formulae ed zero ordthe ‘n’ valu
hat the releasetion RR7 wle thermo seth all the necr mucoadhes
E William D.; ndrews' Diseaogy. Saunders EC. 1988. Candihy. Bailliere Tiyake, L. P., an: an old d
ary, Dental upda., and J. Fletcn saliva: stimu
USION temperature e decreased wc 188 from 3f 10% to is important h higher presashed out frstrength of foexhibited go
RR code formoncentration n character n important ppplication in
was signific/cm2 (RR1)ula RR7 whd 15% of P
dhesive polymved that carbthan Pluroni
ucted throughe formulae .4% and 86.6
The diffusionss may be duel which rereduction indiffusion of
was found toe of carboming and hrelease kinetof thermo s
der release mue of korseme mechanismas the best
ensitive ciclocessary charsion to effec
Berger, Timoases of the
Elsevier. ida and candidndale, London,
nd T. W. MacFisease in neate January/Febcher. 1971. Glation by gluco
induced in with increas
35.5oC to 23.15% (RR1 because str
ssure than wrom the siteormulation Rood gel strenmulation whof Pluronic
at 37ºC.physicochemn buccal cavcantly increa) to 4992hich consistsPluronic, as mer (Carbom
bomer has beic. The in vgh the chic
RR1, RR6 6% respectivn of drug frue to presencetards the dn dimensionf drug thro be more wh
mer 934, whhelps in fatics showed sensitive in mechanism meyer equat
m was fickanformula am
opiroxolaminracters of thectively treat
othy G.; et e Skin: Clin
dosis: a review, United KingdoFarlane. 1990.ew guises. Abruary 1990.
Growth of Canose associated
situ e in 4oC to
rong weak e of RR6 ngth hich and The
mical vity. ased 2.06 s of the
mer) etter vitro cken and
vely from e of
drug n of ugh hich hich aster that situ and tion .
mong nein e in the
al. nical
w and om. Oral
AIDS
ndida with
Jaya raja kumar et al /J. Pharm. Sci. & Res. Vol.4(2), 2012, 1716--1723
1722
antibiotics, corticosteroids’ and diabetes mellitus. J. Infect. Dis. 123:371-377.
[5] Seelig, M. S. 1966. Mechanisms by which antibiotics increase the incidence and severity of candidiasis and alter the immunological defenses. Bacterial. Rev. 30:442-459.
[6] Saltarelli, C. G., K. A. Gentile, and S. C. Mancuso. 1975. Lethality of Candida strains as influenced by the host. Can. J. Microbial. 21:648-654.
[7] Taschdjian, C. L., M. S. Seelig, and P. J Kozinn. 1973. Serological diagnosis of candidiasis. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 4:19-60.
[8] Heimdahl, A., and C. E. Nord. 1990. Oral yeast infections in immunocompromised and seriously diseased patients. Acta Odontol. Scand. 48:77-84.
[9] Horn, R., B. Wong, and T. E. Kiehn. 1985. Fungemia in a cancer hospital: changing frequency, earlier onset, and results of therapy. Rev. Infect. Dis. 7:646-655.
[10] Wingard, J. R., W. G. Merz, M. G. Rinaldi, T. R. Johnson, J. E. Karp, and R. Saral. 1991. Increase in Candida krusei infection among patients with bone marrow transplantation and neutropenia treated prophylactically with fluconazole. N. Engl. J. Med. 325:1274-1277.
[11] Bodey, G. P. 1986. Fungal infection and fever of unknown origin in neutropenic patients. Am. J. Med. 80:112-119.
[12] Gold, J. W. M. 1984. Opportunistic fungal infections in patients with neoplastic disease. Am. J. Med. 76:458-463.
[13] Maksymuik, A. W., S. Thongprosert, and R. Hopfer. 1984. Systemic candidiasis in cancer patients. Am. J. Med. 77:20-27.
[14] Samaranayake, L. P. 1992. Oral mycoses in HIV infection. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 73:171-180.
[15] HarishMatapady,Narayana et al . Development of a gellan gum based mucoadhesive in situ gels for buccal local delivery system of fluconazole,int.j.chhem.sci:7(1),2009,315-326
[16] Pandit NK, Kisaka J. Loss of gelation ability of Pluronic 127 in the presence of some salts [J]. Int J Pharm, 1996, 145:129-136
[17] Mitra Jelvehgaria, Mohammad-Reza Rashidib, Hedayte Samadi a, b Mucoadhesive and Drug Release Properties of Benzocaine Gel Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Autumn 2006: 2(4): 185-19
[18] Choi HG, Jung JH, Ryu JM, Yoon SJ, Oh YK, Kim CK, Development of in situ-gelling and mucoadhesive acetaminophen liquid suppository. Int J Pharm.1998; 165:33-44.
[19] Jagdish Balasubramaniam., In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the Gelrite® gellan gum-based ocular delivery system for indomethacin, Acta Pharm. 53 (2003) 251–261
Jaya raja kumar et al /J. Pharm. Sci. & Res. Vol.4(2), 2012, 1716--1723
1723