Copyright © 2012, Everest Global, Inc. EGR-2012-2-PD-0747
Topic: Global Offshore Global In-house Center (GIC) Landscape and Trends Focus Geography – Poland
Global Sourcing Report: August 2012 – Preview Deck
Copyright © 2012, Everest Global, Inc. EGR-2012-2-PD-0747
2
Our research offerings for global services
Market Vista Global services tracking across functions, sourcing models, locations, and service providers – industry tracking reports also available
Custom research capabilities Benchmarking | Pricing, delivery model, skill portfolio Peer analysis | Scope, sourcing models, locations Locations | Cost, skills, sustainability, portfolio Tracking services | Service providers, locations, risk Other | Market intelligence, service provider capabilities, technologies
Healthcare
Information Technology
Finance & Accounting
Procurement
Banking, Financial Services, Insurance
Global Sourcing
Cloud Vista
Human Resources Recruitment Process
Transaction Intelligence Pricepoint Service Provider
intelligence
Subscription information
The full report is included in the following subscription(s) – Global Sourcing
In addition to published
research, a subscription may include analyst inquiry, data cuts, and other services
If you want to learn whether your organization has a subscription agreement or request information on pricing and subscription options, please contact us: – [email protected] – +1-214-451-3110
Copyright © 2012, Everest Global, Inc. EGR-2012-2-PD-0747
3
Terminology | Global In-house Center (GIC) replacing “captive”
Context
Historically, the term “captive” has referred to service delivery operations in lower cost geographies, which are owned and operated by the same company receiving the services (i.e., not third-party outsourcing)
Although the term has become widely used, it has a perceived negative tone and is not self-explanatory, causing confusion for those new to the global services space
Furthermore, many organizations, for which captive is intended to describe, do not use the term themselves
What has changed Everest Group has adopted “Global In-house
Center” or “GIC” as the preferred term to replace “captive”
This will appear in all of our reports and content beginning in July 2012
Growing industry-wide shift Both NASSCOM (India) and BPAP (Philippines) are championing the change in terminology
Copyright © 2012, Everest Global, Inc. EGR-2012-2-PD-0747
4
Background and scope of research
The global sourcing market evolved and grew rapidly to reach a size of ~US$116 billion in 2011. GICs were a core component of this evolution with companies such as Texas Instruments and GE setting up offshore GIC units in the late 1980s and early 1990s
The last 15 to 20 years witnessed increased adoption of the GIC model with a large number of companies setting up / expanding their GICs. While India continues to remain a leading geography, companies also explored and successfully established GIC operations in China, the Philippines, Central and Eastern Europe, and Latin America. Recently, Middle East and North Africa (MENA) has emerged as attractive offshoring destination
However, significant growth of third-party service providers and selective divestitures during the economic crisis led to the perception that the GIC model is under threat. Stated reasons include GIC not delivering value and being significantly more expensive than third-party service providers
At the same time, mature users of the GIC model articulate their commitment to it and reinforce its importance in their sourcing strategy and portfolio. Additionally, our discussions with global sourcing offices of large companies and GIC leadership reveal imperatives under way to expand the role of GIC and its value proposition
This research provides an in-depth analysis of the global offshore GIC landscape across leading locations. The report is based on Everest Group’s proprietary GIC database and is updated every six months. Besides providing details on global GIC landscape trends and analysis, the report also contains a focus section that provides a deep-dive into the GIC landscape in a select geography. This edition features Poland as the focus geography
Copyright © 2012, Everest Global, Inc. EGR-2012-2-PD-0747
5
Buyer organizations have a range of options for capturing value from offshoring, with GIC and third-party outsourcing as the primary models
Strategic alliance / Joint Venture model
Offshore business models
Third-party outsourcing model
GIC model
Managed third-party offshoring Full- / part-time resources on the
ground to facilitate transition, relationship management, and transfer of organization and domain knowledge to third-party providers
Example: Greenpoint-Infosys BPO
Pure GIC model An internal cost center or a
100% subsidiary company to cater exclusively to the parent company
Examples: American Express, HSBC
Inverted BOT Offshore service providers
provide only implementation support initially and are allowed to buy into the entity at a later date
Examples: AIG-Polaris, BA-WNS
Build Operate Transfer (BOT) / Joint Venture (JV) Provider-owned / joint
operations that can be transferred back to the customer
Example: eServe-Citigroup
Pure third-party offshoring Use of an offshore provider to
outsource business processes or IT services
Examples: Alcoa-Infosys, Rio Tinto - Wipro
Source: Everest Group analysis
The focus of this report is on the GIC model
Copyright © 2012, Everest Global, Inc. EGR-2012-2-PD-0747
6
This research leverages Everest Group’s proprietary GIC database that tracks offshore GICs of leading companies
Key dimensions tracked Scale (FTE range)
Industry verticals
Functions offered (e.g., IT, BP, ES / R&D)
Parent geographies
Parent size (revenue range)
Location of delivery centers
Unique characteristics
Industry’s most comprehensive database of global GICs located across India, Rest of Asia, Europe, Latin America, and Africa
Tracks GICs of leading firms (e.g., Forbes 2000 and Fortune 500 companies)
Database covers more than 1,200 GICs
Focus on GICs providing offshore delivery of global services – excludes shared services centers serving the domestic market
Everest Group’s proprietary GIC database
Copyright © 2012, Everest Global, Inc. EGR-2012-2-PD-0747
7
Table of contents (page 1 of 2)
Section I: Executive summary 9 Section II: Overview of the global GIC landscape 13 Summary 14 Global offshore services and GIC market: Size and growth 15 Distribution of the global offshore GIC landscape by:
– Parent revenue 18 – Parent geography 19 – Industry vertical 20 – Functions supported 21 – Offshore delivery locations 23
Section III: Deep-dive into key industry verticals 26 Summary 27 Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance (BFSI ) 28 Energy and Utilities (E&U) 31 Healthcare 34 Manufacturing, Distribution, and Retail (MDR) 37 Technology 40 Telecom 43 Section IV: Recent trends in the global GIC landscape (Jan 2010- Jun 2012) 46 Summary 47 Recent trends in GIC set-ups and divestitures 48
Topic Page no.
Copyright © 2012, Everest Global, Inc. EGR-2012-2-PD-0747
8
Table of contents (page 2 of 2)
Topic Page no.
Section IV: Recent trends in the global GIC landscape (2009-2011) (continued…) Recent trends in offshore GIC landscape (2009-2011) by:
– Parent revenue 49 – Parent geography 50 – Industry verticals 51 – Functions supported 52 – Key GIC locations 53
List of offshore GIC divestitures (2009-2011) 58
Section V: Focus geography: GIC landscape in Poland 61 Summary 62 Poland global services market: size and growth 63 Distribution of offshore GICs in Poland by:
– Headcount 67 – Parent revenue 68 – Parent geography 69 – Industry vertical 70 – Functions supported 71 – Locations 72
Deep-dive into key industry verticals 74 Appendix 80 Recent offshore GIC set-ups (H2 2011 and H1 2012) 82 Glossary of key terms 103 Additional research recommendations 104
Copyright © 2012, Everest Global, Inc. EGR-2012-2-PD-0747
9
This research report provides an in-depth analysis of the global GIC landscape and trends
Number of leading offshore GICs Distribution of offshore GICs by parent geography
2012; Percentage
GIC activity | Market activity heatmap
Source: Everest Group (2012)
Distribution of offshore GICs by functions 2012; Percentage
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 H1 2012
100% = 1,251
U.S.
UK
Rest of Europe (ROE)
APAC ROW
43%
43%
40% IT
ES / R&D
BP
Comments
High adoption in the technology vertical, followed by MDR
High adoption in technology, followed by BFSI and MDR industry verticals
High adoption in the BFSI vertical Gaining traction in MDR and
technology verticals
100% = 1,251
Copyright © 2012, Everest Global, Inc. EGR-2012-2-PD-0747
10
The report analyzes the GIC market across six key industry verticals
BFSI
Energy and Utilities (E&U) Telecom
Technology Healthcare
Key industry verticals
MDR
Copyright © 2012, Everest Global, Inc. EGR-2012-2-PD-0747
11
This study also provides an analysis of the recent trend (2010 to H1 2012) within the global GIC landscape
Number of offshore GIC divestitures Distribution of offshore GICs by parent revenue Percentage
Distribution of offshore GICs by industry vertical Percentage
Source: Everest Group (2012)
Distribution of offshore GICs by functions
4
2
0
2010 2011 H12012 Up to H1 2012 2010 2011 H1 2012
US$10-50 billion
>US$50 billion
US$5-10 billion
<US$1 billion
US$1-5 billion
100% = 1,251
Up to H1 2012 2010 2011 H1 2012
100% = 1,251
Technology
MDR
BFSI
Telecom E&U Healthcare
Others
Others
IT
ES / R&D
BP
Up to 2012; Percentage 2010; Percentage 2011; Percentage H1 2012; Percentage
100% = 1,251 100% = 1,251 100% = 1,251 100% = 1,251
Copyright © 2012, Everest Global, Inc. EGR-2012-2-PD-0747
12
The report also covers a detailed analysis of the focus geography – Poland
Source: Everest Group (2012)
Poland IT-BPO export revenue by service segments 2011; US$ billion
Distribution of market by delivery models 2011; Number of FTEs
Number of leading offshore GICs in Poland Distribution of offshore GICs by headcount – range of FTEs 20121; Percentage
100% = 1,251
BPO
ITO
Shared services
Third-party
R&D
100% = 1,251
2,001-5,000
<500
500-1,000
1,001-2,000
100% = 1,251
2004 2005-06 2007-08 2009-10 2011-12 2012
New GIC set-ups
Copyright © 2012, Everest Global, Inc. EGR-2012-2-PD-0747
13
Appendix: Additional research recommendations
For more information on this and other research published by Everest Group, please contact us: Salil Dani, Research Director: Anurag Srivastava, Senior Analyst Ritika Dhingra, Knowledge Associate :
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
Everest Group Two Galleria Tower 13455 Noel Road, Suite 2100 Dallas, TX 75240
Phone: +1-214-451-3110 E-mail: [email protected]
The following documents are recommended for additional insight into the topic covered in this research. The recommended documents either provide additional details on the topic or complementary content that may be of interest 1. Global Offshore Captive Landscape and Trends: Focus Geography - The Philippines (EGR-2011-2-R-0661); 2012. This
report analyzes the global offshore GIC landscape and key trends for the last three years (2009-2011). The report also provides a deep-dive analysis of the offshore GIC landscape in the Philippines, covering market size and growth and distribution of GIC landscape. It deep-dives into industry verticals
2. Global Locations Compass – China (EGR-2011-2-R-0606); 2011. The report provides detailed data and analysis on the global services landscape in China
3. Global Locations Compass - The Philippines (EGR-2012-2-R-0637); 2011. The report provides detailed data and analysis on the global services landscape in the Philippines
Copyright © 2012, Everest Global, Inc. EGR-2012-2-PD-0747
14
Everest Group Leading clients from insight to action
Everest Group is an advisor to business leaders on the next generation of global services with a worldwide reputation for helping Global 1000 firms dramatically improve their performance by optimizing their back- and middle-office business services. With a fact-based approach driving outcomes, Everest Group counsels organizations with complex challenges related to the use and delivery of global services in their pursuits to balance short-term needs with long-term goals. Through its practical consulting, original research, and industry resource services, Everest Group helps clients maximize value from delivery strategies, talent and sourcing models, technologies, and management approaches. Established in 1991, Everest Group serves users of global services, providers of services, country organizations, and private equity firms in six continents across all industry categories. For more information, please visit www.everestgrp.com and research.everestgrp.com.
Dallas (Corporate Headquarters) [email protected] +1-214-451-3000 New York [email protected] +1-646-805-4000
Toronto [email protected] +1-416-865-2033 London [email protected] +44-207-887-1483
India / Middle East [email protected] +91-124-496-1000
Stay connected
Blogs www.sherpasinblueshirts.com www.gainingaltitudeinthecloud.com
Websites www.everestgrp.com research.everestgrp.com
Twitter @EverestGroup @Everest_Cloud