8/2/2019 Georges Project
1/29
1
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
This chapter entails background to the study followed by statement of the problem, objective of
the study, statement of hypotheses, significance of the study, scope of the study, and organization
of the study.
1.0 Background to the StudyOver the last 15 years, Ghana has become a showcase of successful macroeconomic reforms and
stabilization programs. Starting with its economic reform program in1983, Ghanas government
has managed to achieve a broad budget balance, to implement a system of flexible exchange
rates, and to liberalize the countrys trade regime. Also, it started to install an investor-friendly
regulatory environment, initiatedthe privatization of 230 state owned enterprises, and began to
significantly reduce theexport tax on cocoa, the countrys second most important export product
after gold. Ghana is often described as one of West Africas development success stories: the
countrys growth and poverty reduction rates are among the very best in the region. Ghanas
stable, peaceful political climate supports a policy environment conducive to economic and
social progress and poverty reduction.
Ghana's economy and politics are stable and should continue to grow as the sub-Saharan African
nation enters its 50th year, according to a Deutsche Bank analyst. Deutsche Bank Group analyst,
Marion Muhlberger, said with an annual output of 2 million ounces of gold per year, Ghana is
the second-largest gold exporter on the continent, behind only South Africa. And with gold
prices well above $700 an ounce, the economy should continue to perform, she said in a report
published on the bank's Web site Friday said. "Solid annual economic growth of around 6
percent in real terms, inflation rates only barely into double digits, a relatively stable currency,
satisfactory public finances and low foreign debt thanks to forgiveness measures were the icingon the cake," Muhlberger said in the report, originally published in the German newspaper
Borsenzeitung. Also, she noted a recent discovery of at least 600 million barrels of oil off the
country's coast, and while production will not happen immediately, the "black gold" will
generate "considerable additional revenues for Ghana in the medium term at least," she said.
8/2/2019 Georges Project
2/29
2
The countrys economy was the fastest growing in the world in 2011, recording growth rate of
13.4 percent. Launching the Banks global economic prospects report via a video-conference
today, Mr. Andrew Burns, Manager of Global Macroeconomics in the World Banks Prospects
Group, said Ghana is still in position to register strong economic growth without the oil sector,
particularly in construction services as large infrastructure projects are being undertaken. He
said, Ghanas economy benefited from strong rebound of both volumes and prices of gold and
cocoa increase in tourism.
However as the saying goes Statistics is like a bikini on a sexy woman. It shows you a lot of
interesting stuff but it does not show you everything. Such is the nature of Ghanas impressive
but uninspiring growth data. At 13.6%, the country is one of the fastest growing economies in
the world. Last year, it was elevated to lower middle-income status after a recalculation of GDP
figures. Not a bad record, except that underneath the stratospheric growth numbers lays serious
troublesunemployment, poverty and poor living standards. Nonetheless, government officials
and international bureaucrats alike never tire of whipping up such impressive but uninspiring
economic data to justify why they think they are doing a fine job as stewards of the economy.
Asked why he deserves a second term in office during his latest interaction with the Ghanaian
media, President Mills was quick to cite GDP growth amongst his top three reasons. Ghana
remains a star pupil of the IMF and the World Bank largely because of its impressive growth
indicators. Yes, growth matters. But the fact remains that although growth rates may indicate
economic boom; however, the reality on the ground in Ghana is very different. Apart from the
President and his technocrats at the Bank of Ghana and the Ministry of Finance who are bustling
in their glory, common folks wonder and often ask; where exactly do these figures come from?
If Ghanas economy is on such an inspiring growth path, should it not be creating jobs, raising
standards of living, and improving the welfare of its people?
These are questions worthy of asking but yet again the Ghana Statistical Service provides
another bikini figure for answers. The truth is, despite the upward growth rates, Ghanas
economy has been unable to provide enough jobs for the endless stream of graduates emerging
from the universities, colleges, polytechnics and the secondary schools. The cocoa industry, the
backbone of the economy for the past 100 hundred years, has failed to attract new farmers,
especially the educated. The mining sector is largely controlled by foreign interest. It employs
8/2/2019 Georges Project
3/29
3
very few people and most of the profits are repatriated abroad. Manufacturing is largely
stagnant, contributing only 9% of GDP. And oil production is unlikely to generate direct large
scale employment despite the high expectations. The Ghanaian economy with its enormous
resources and impressive on one side and the grim picture of economic problems presents a
paradox.
Consumption has remained an important parameter in evaluation of economic development.
There is indeed an established relationship between human quality of life and its impact reflected
through their consumption pattern. Consumption expenditure is one of the primary components
of Gross Domestic Product (GDP).GDP of any nation is nothing but the aggregate demand of
goods and services. The relation between aggregate income and aggregate consumption is a
significant component in explaining the analysis of national Income. The effect of consumption
function on economic fluctuations was mentioned by all the eminent economists from Malthus to
Wicksell in explaining the business cycle literature and its contribution in economic
development. Over a period every economy, whether developed or developing, has observed
change in the consumption pattern, which had been an outcome of changing life style. Better
quality of life is an indicator of economic development and consumption pattern has changed
with escalation in quality of life, proving its significance.
The aggregate consumption expenditure is one of the largest components of Gross National
Product (GNP) accounting for 65-75 per cent of it in different developed and developing
economies. Consumption expenditure is one of the most important macro variable, alongside
investment, government spending and net export (export minus import) used in macroeconomic
analysis in real terms and also the most important factor in determining the level of economic
activities in an economy (Dwivedi, 2005). It is, therefore, not surprising that Ghanaians spend
larger proportion of their income, largely on goods and services (Ghana Statistical Service,
2006). Such a country normally has high rate of interest, low investment and tends to grow
relatively slow. This is sometimes referred to as present-oriented country.
A recent literature has documented a large rise in consumption inequality in several developing
countries, including Ghana. Global inequality in consumption, while reducing, is still high.
Using latest figures available, in 2005, the wealthiest 20% of the world accounted for 76.6% of
8/2/2019 Georges Project
4/29
4
total private consumption. The poorest fifth just 1.5%:
Breaking that down slightly further, the poorest 10% accounted for just 0.5% and the wealthiest
10% accounted for 59% of all the consumption:
8/2/2019 Georges Project
5/29
5
In 1995, the inequality in consumption was wider, but the United Nations also provided some
eye-opening statistics (which do not appear available, yet, for the later years) worth noting.
Todays consumption is undermining the environmental resource base. It is exacerbating
inequalities. And the dynamics of the consumption-poverty-inequality-environment nexus are
accelerating. If the trends continue without change not redistributing from high-income to
low-income consumers, not shifting from polluting to cleaner goods and production
technologies, not promoting goods that empower poor producers, not shifting priority from
consumption for conspicuous display to meeting basic needs todays problems of
consumption and human development will worsen.
According to the UN Development Programme's 1998 Human Development Report, there is
nothing wrong with consumption. In fact, consumption is essential for economic growth. Thereal issue is not consumption itself but its patterns and effects. There is something very wrong
with the great disparities in current consumption patterns. Inequalities in consumption are stark.
Globally, the 20% of the worlds people in the highest-income countries account for 86% of total
private consumption expendituresthe poorest 20% a minuscule 1.3%. More specifically, the
richest fifth:
8/2/2019 Georges Project
6/29
6
Consume 45% of all meat and fish, the poorest fifth 5% Consume 58% of total energy, the poorest fifth less than 4% Have 74% of all telephone lines, the poorest fifth 1.5% Consume 84% of all paper, the poorest fifth 1.1% Own 87% ofthe worlds vehicle fleet, the poorest fifth less than 1%
Today two out of three Africans live on $2 per day. But things are changing. Africa is
developing new consumers from developing economies, and their purchasing power today ranks
among the very poor and the middle class. They earn between 2 and 10 dollars per day and have
solved their existential problems. They are teachers, nurses, small businessmen, private sector
employees. They are trying to improve their comfort and can afford consumer electronic goods,
send their children to private schools, extend their homes and most of them have a second job.
Since 1950, the world's consumption expenditure has increased six-fold, to $24 trillion in 1998.
Of this, 86 per cent is accounted for by the richest fifth of the world's population, while the
poorest fifth's share is only 1.3 per cent. At $200 billion, sub-Saharan Africa's 1995 consumption
expenditures amounted to a mere 0.9 per cent of the $21.7 trillion global total. The average
African household consumes 20 per cent less today than it did 25 years ago. The report points
out that the entire world population's needs in the areas of basic health and nutrition, water and
sanitation, basic education, as well as women's reproductive health could be met with additional
annual expenditures totalling $40 billion. This compares with the $50 billion and $105 billion
Europeans spend annually on cigarettes and alcoholic drinks, respectively, and with global
spending of $400 billion and $780 billion on narcotic drugs and the military
Food consumption expressed in kilocalories (kcal) per capita per day is a key variable used for
measuring and evaluating the evolution of the global and regional food situation. A more
appropriate term for this variable would be nationalaverage apparent food consumption since
the data come from national Food Balance Sheets rather than from food consumption surveys.
Analysis of FAO statistical database shows that dietary energy measured in kcals per capita per
day has been steadily increasing on a worldwide basis; availability of calories per capita from the
mid-1960s to the late 1990s increased globally by approximately 450 kcal per capita per day and
by over 600 kcal per capita per day in developing countries (see Table 1.1). This change has not,
8/2/2019 Georges Project
7/29
7
however, been equal across regions. The per capita supply of calories has remained almost
stagnant in sub-Saharan Africa and has recently fallen in the countries in economic transition. In
contrast, the per capita supply of energy has risen dramatically in East Asia (by almost 1000 kcal
per capita per day, mainly in China) and in the Near East/North Africa region (by over 700 kcal
per capita per day).
Table 1.1 Actual and Projected Global and Regional per capita food Consumption (kcal
per capita per day)
Region 1964 - 19661974 - 19761984 - 19861997 - 19992015
World 2358 2435 2655 2803 2940
Developing countries 2054 2152 2450 2681 2850
Near East and North Africa 2290 2591 2953 3006 3090
Sub-Saharan Africa* 2058 2079 2057 2195 2360
Latin America and the Caribbean 2393 2546 2689 2824 2980
East Asia 1957 2105 2559 2921 3060
South Asia 2017 1986 2205 2403 2700
Industrialized countries 2947 3065 3206 3380 3440
Transition countries 3222 3385 3379 2906 3060
* Excludes South Africa.
Source: FAO, 2003.
A new social class, enjoying a "little prosperity, has emerged in Africa. The emergence of the
African middle class has transformed the black continent into one of the most promising markets
in the world. This new class now has some twenty million people, against 12.8 million in 2000.
In 2030, they will be around 43 million. They live mainly in the most highly developed countriesof the continent such as South Africa, Nigeria or Ghana. The middle classes are also developing
in Senegal, Ivory Coast and Kenya, and they are adopting new consumption patterns.
With the development of a true middle class, consumption patterns are changing. Shopping malls
and large retailers are increasing across the continent. In Ghana, a new mall has just seen the day
8/2/2019 Georges Project
8/29
8
in the heart of the capital. The Accra Mall hosts over 20,000 square meters and more than 65
shops. Pan-African groups from South Africa, such as Shoprite and Game, have opened their
stores there. The first group is also present in 19 sub-Saharan countries and the second in eleven.
This shows that African companies are now developing across the continent. Africas growth has
exceeded 5% per annum over the last decade (Only Asia has done better), and its consumption
potential is not so far from that of India.
Consumption fluctuates much less than Gross National Product (GNP).The least stable
component of consumption is durable consumption. Services and nondurable consumption grows
more smoothly. The main reason that consumption fluctuates much less than GNP is that
disposable income fluctuates less than GNP. Consumption is financed out of disposable income.
Over the past decades in the United States of America, consumption has more or less tracked
income according to a simple Keynesian consumption function with a MPC of 0.91 of each
incremental dollar of disposable income, 91 cents has been spent on consumption goods and 9
cents has been saved (Hall and Taylor, 1988).
Consumption theories explain the relationship between income and consumption. It is, therefore,
very crucial to have a working knowledge of the theories of consumption, determination of
consumption expenditure and the nature of relationship between consumption and its
determinants. Economists agree that income is the main determinant of consumption
expenditure, but they differ widely on the nature of income. According to Keynes (1936),
consumption depends on the current, absolute income of the consumer; Duesenberry
hypothesizes that consumption depends on relative income, i.e. income of a household in
relations to that of the peer group; Friedman postulates that consumption is related to permanent
income, i.e. the lifetime income; Robert Ando and Franco Modigliani relate consumption to
income cycle of the consumer over his or her lifetime (Dwivedi, 2005). Each of these hypotheses
has its own strengths and weaknesses and relevant in a particular context.
It must be noted that change in income does not fully explain the change in consumption
expenditure although income is the dominant determinant of the consumption level. It implies
that there are some non-income factors also which influence the proportion of income spent. As
Ackley (1969) has remarked, Either there is an erratic, unexplainable elements in spending,
particularly important in the short run, or there are other systematic factors influencing
8/2/2019 Georges Project
9/29
9
consumption that need to be brought into the analysis. These non -income factors include
interest rate, wealth, change in price level, expectations, demography etc. Some economists have
made empirical studies to find the influence of such factors on the household consumption. The
empirical findings have, however, not produced conclusive evidence on non-income factors in
the aggregate consumption
1.1 Statement of the Problem
A nations economic performance or growth can be influenced by consumption, saving, and
investment etc. Future oriented nations that save and invest large proportion of their income
achieve growth of output and income. This is because such a country normally has high saving
and investment ratios. Consumption and saving decisions are at the heart of both short- and long-
run macroeconomic analysis (as well as much of microeconomics). In the short run, spending
dynamics are of central importance for business cycle analysis and the management of monetary
policy. And in the long run, aggregate saving determines the size of the aggregate capital stock,
with consequences for wages, interest rates, and the standard of living. Long-term economic
growth requires capital investmentin infrastructure, education and technology, for example, as
well as in factories, business expansion, and so forthand the main domestic source of funds for
capital investment is household savings. Consistently high savings rates over time in aparticular
country can translate into funds being available for this long-term growth. In addition, higherlevels of household savings allow a larger portion of a countrys overall debt to be financed
internally. Analysts consider a high debt level primarily financed by domestic savings to be more
easily sustained than high debt levels primarily financed by external (foreign) creditors
Sub-Saharan Africa has the lowest savings rate in the developing world. While figures vary from
country to country, gross domestic savings in the region averaged about 18 per cent of gross
domestic product (GDP) in 2005, compared with 26 per cent in South Asia and nearly 43 per
cent in East Asia and Pacific countries, according to World Bank estimates. In some countries,
those rates are even on the decline There are many reasons for Africas low savings rates,
including inadequate financial services
African countries ability to finance a greater share of their development needs from domestic
sources would give them much-needed flexibility in the formulation and implementation of
8/2/2019 Georges Project
10/29
10
policies to address development challenges, direct resources into high-priority areas and
strengthen state capacity, finds a 2007 UNCTAD Yet until recently, most international
conferences and summit meetings to address the financing of Africas social and economic
development have generally focused on ways to mobilize more foreign resources. That is
changing. But flows of official development assistance (ODA) to Africa remain volatile, and as
the UNCTAD report notes, dependence on external resource flows leaves countries vulnerable
to external shocks. Moreover, the regions share of global foreign direct investment (FDI) has
stayed low. As a result, African governments are increasingly turning their attention to the need
to enhance savings rates.
In Ghana, for instance, since the early 1960s, consumption has risen substantially as a share of
Gross Domestic Product (GDP). This might undermine the motive of stabilizing inflation byputting upward pressure on prices of domestic commodities. This also partly influences the slow
growth rate of the Ghanaian economy.
According to the Ghana Statistical Service (2006), the average annual household income in
Ghana is about GH1,217.00 whilst the average per capita income is almost GH400. There are
regional differences with Greater Accra region recording the highest of GH544.00 whilst Upper
West and Upper East regions had less than GH130.00. Urban localities had higher per capita
income than rural localities. The three main sources of household income in Ghana are income
from agricultural activities (35%), wage income from employment (29%) and income from self-
employment (25%). Remittances constitute less than 10 per cent of household income. The
annual estimated total value of remittances received in Ghana is GH547,571 million whilst the
estimated total annual value of remittances paid out by households is GH231,344 million which
represents 42 per cent of all remittances received.
In addition, the Ghana Statistical Service (2006) revealed that the average annual household
expenditure in Ghana is GH1,918.00 whilst the mean annual per capita consumption
expenditure in Ghana is GH644.00. Regional differences exist with Greater Accra Region
having the highest per capita expenditure of GH1,050.00 whilst Upper West has the lowest of
GH166.00. The average annual household expenditure is about 1.6 times higher in urban
localities (GH2,449) than in rural localities (GH1,514) even though the household size in rural
8/2/2019 Georges Project
11/29
11
households tends to be larger than urban households. Food expenditure accounts for two-fifth of
total household expenditure, while the imputed value of own-produced food consumed by
households represents a further 10.5 per cent. Expenditure on housing in Ghana averages 2.4 per
cent of the total household expenditure. Expenditure on housing is higher in Greater Accra
Region than the other regions. At the time of the survey Ghanaian households were spending on
average an amount of almost GH2,680 million per annum with food (including non-alcoholic
beverages) representing about a third of the total expenditure while non-food expenditure
represented about 70 per cent of the total household expenditure. Within the non-food
expenditure group, transport contributes the highest of 16.7 per cent to the total expenditure. The
next most important expenditure groups in terms of amount spent are housing, water, electricity
and gas (7.9%), recreation and culture (6.1%) and education (5.3%).
A negative savings rate indicates that a household spends more than it receives as regular income
and finances some of the expenditure through credit (increasing debt), through gains arising from
the sale of assets (financial or non-financial), or by running down cash and deposits. One
important rhetorical question that readily follows is whether or not a country whose average
annual household expenditure is greater than its average annual household income (as in Ghana)
can make any significant investment in order to achieve rapid economic growth and
development?
The sprawling Obuasi township consists of three faces: the plush residential area for Anglo-
gold Ashanti ( AGA) management, AGA junior staff residence, and the main Obuasi town,
which from the point of view of visitors has very little resemblance to a resource-rich town.
Wide consumption inequality exists among households of these sections of the town.
Consumption is normally high among households in the plush residential area for AGA
management. For households in the AGA junior staff residence, consumption is abnormally
high. Indeed in Obuasi, gold mining jobs are somewhat the most widely available and highest
paying. Sadly, you do not need to have experience, a clear criminal background, or even a high
school diploma, just common sense, a strong work ethic, and a clean drug test. Work hard, play
hard is the motto as miners spend extravagantly to enjoy what little time they have off. Most of
the men are deeply in debt after buying new homes, vehicles, LCDs. Some even plan what
payments they can afford based on how much overtime they plan on working. It is a vicious
8/2/2019 Georges Project
12/29
12
cycle that keeps coal miners scared for their job for fear of losing everything they have, working
to the advantage of the gold companys production. On the contrary, consumption rate is very
low among households of the main Obuasi town. Residents here are mainly farmers from the
surrounding communities of Binesere, Dokyiwa, Mamiriwa, Sansu, Anyinam, Apitiso, Nhyiaeso,
Anwiam among many others who have been rendered unemployed due to the operations of the
mining company. They are mainly petty traders and manual labourers. A thorough observation
of the main Obuasi town reveal sporadic consumption rate among the folks due to fluctuations in
their incomes. That is, household consumption is very low at one point in time and very high at
another period. This menace stems from the fact that petty trading mainly in foodstuff is the
dominant occupation among the people of the town; therefore, consumption is expected to be
high during the bumper harvest especially around August when income of both farmers and
traders is expected to rise astronomically and fluctuates, thereafter.
A research conducted on behalf of the municipality by some NGOs in 2008 disclosed that most
households spend extravagantly during occasions such as funerals (especially the purchase of
different type of funeral cloth). Some parents are adamant and reluctant to pay for their
childrens school fees which adversely affect those children in their later life. Although measures
were put in place to redirect household spending to areas such as education, this had not yielded
much result.
It is in view of this problem that the researcher intends to determine what factors actually
influence the level of household consumption in Obuasi Township. Is it only income or income
together with other socio-economic factors such as wealth, interest rate, change in price level,
expectations, demography etc.?
1.2 Objectives of the Study
1.2.1 General Objective
To determine the factors that influence household consumption
1.2.2 Specific Objectives
1. To determine the level of household income and their effects on consumption.
8/2/2019 Georges Project
13/29
13
2. To examine the relationship between household consumption and socio-economicvariables such as income, family size, age, wealth, remittance and education.
3. To verify and investigate Keynes conjecture of fundamental psychological law.4. To suggest some policy recommendations
1.3 Statement of Hypotheses
In relation to the statement of the problem and the objectives of the study, the following
hypotheses are formulated for testing.
Ho: Household income does not influence consumption, against
H1: Household income does influence consumption.
H0: Household income, family size, age, wealth, remittances, and education jointly influence the
level of household consumption, against
H1: Household income, family size, age, wealth, and remittances, and education do not jointly
influence the level of household consumption
1.5 Significance of the Study
The rationale of the study is to analyze the consumption pattern of the people of Obuasi and
explore issues regarding the factors that influence consumption. There is no doubt that aggregate
consumption is a key variable for policy makers. The aim of this research is to determine factors
that significantly determine household consumption and draw out the implications for policy
analysis. This finding is intended to be accessible to those working in policy-related departments
without losing economic rigour. Specifically, this research will serve as a guide to the
government, policy makers and the council of elders of Obuasi town on their decisions on how to
improve the consumption pattern of the people of Obuasi and Ghanaians as a whole and on the
flip side, how to promote household saving which is essential for sustainable growth and
development given that dependence on external resource flows leaves countries vulnerable to
8/2/2019 Georges Project
14/29
14
external shocks. The findings may also serve as guide and reference material to the general
public, students and researchers who are researching into similar areas
1.6 Scope of the Study
The focus of the study is to examine the determinants of household consumption. However the
study has been narrowed to Obuasi town in the Ashanti Region. This stems from the fact that not
much of such research has been done in the area. To ensure easy access to the relevant
information, the researcher segmented Obuasi into three. These are the residential area for
Anglo-gold Ashanti ( AGA) management, AGA junior staff residence, and the main Obuasi
town. The multiple linear regression model will be used to establish the significance of the
individual explanatory variables on consumption.
1.7 Organization of the Study
The study is divided into five chapters as follows:
Chapter one covers the background of the study followed by statement of the problem, objective
of the study, statement of hypothesis, significance of the study, scope of the study and
organization of the study (which gives an insight into how the study has been organized).
Chapter two deals with the review of literature for the study. The literature review comprises
theoretical literature and empirical literature review.
Chapter three is concerned with the research methodology used in the study. It deals with the
specification of the model for the study, research design, population and sampling techniques,
research instrument, data source and method of data collection, definition and measurement of
variables, and estimation techniques.
Chapter four is devoted to the presentation, analysis and discussion of the results. It also deals
with the testing of the hypotheses formulated in the first chapter.
Chapter five, being the last chapter, contains the summary, conclusions, policy implications,
limitations of the research and areas for future study
8/2/2019 Georges Project
15/29
15
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.0 Introduction
This chapter is divided into four sections. The first and second sections deal with the review of
theoretical literature and empirical literature respectively of renowned economists on
consumption. The third section deals with the policy implication of the income-consumption
hypothesis and last section gives concluding remarks of this chapter.
There is no topic in macroeconomics that has a longer, deeper, or more prominent literature than
households choice of how much of their income to consume and save. Economists have long
been interested in the factors determining how a society divides its income proportionally
between consumption and saving. In the past thirty years theoretical and empirical investigation
of these factors has been focused by the concept of the consumption functiona list of the
variables that influence consumption, together with the direction and magnitude of their effects.
Income itself is, of course, high on any such list; and much of recent investigation has concerned
the nature, reliability, and measurement of the dependence of consumption on income.
2.1 Theoretical Literature Review
The term consumption is the using up of the services yielded by a good, while the act of
purchasing it is referred to as consumer expenditure. Goods vary in the length of time over which
they yield services. This comprises durable goods and non-durable goods. Durable goods (for
instance, expenditure on television sets, refrigerators, computers etc.) yield services over a long
period, say more than one year. On the other hand, non-durable goods (for example, expenditure
on food, water etc.) provide services over a relatively short period, say less than one year.
Consumption has generally been defined as the value of non-durables plus the value of flow of
services of durable. (Department of Economics, 2008)
Keynes (1936) was the first to develop a systematic theory of aggregate consumption spending
by the household in his General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. The Keynesian
theory of consumption in its rudimentary form has already been highlighted in chapter one.
8/2/2019 Georges Project
16/29
16
Keynes theory of consumption was, however, challenged after the Second World War on the
ground that the household consumption depends not only on current income but also on a
number of other factors viz. real wealth, interest rate , taxation, availability of consumer credit,
consumers expectations and income distribution so far as aggregate consumption is concerned.
In the process of debate on the issue as to what determines the level of consumption; some
significant contributions were made to the theory of consumption. The development in this area
can be attributed to the lack of empirical evidence to support the various hypotheses that were
developed by the economists. However, the economists generally agree that the household
consumption expenditure is a function of household income but they are not unanimous on
which income- absolute or relative income, current or expected future income, short-run or
permanent (long-run income) or income-cycle over life-time. .
The absoluteincome hypothesis is linked to the basic principle of Keynes theory of
consumption. Keynes General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money was published in
1936.Keynes viewed consumption expenditures in the aggregate as being primarily dependent on
current net income. He contended that, as net income increased, consumption expenditure would
increase but by less than the increase in income. In other words, some savings will take place. If
the marginal propensity to consume is defined as the change in consumption which is associated
with some small change in income, then this assumption imposes the restriction that the marginal
propensity to consume(MPC) will lie between zero and unity. As well as imposing this
restriction Keynes made two other behavioural assumptions:
1. The first was that at low (but unspecified) income levels, consumption will exceedincome, expenditure being financed by dissaving. This amounts to saying that the
marginal propensity to consume is less than the average propensity to consume
(APC).The latter is defined as the ratio of consumption expenditure to income(C/Y).
2. The second assumption was that the marginal propensity to consume (C/Y) or in thelimit dC / dY will itself decline as income increases.
The implications of this assumption are worth emphasizing. First, it is clear that if information
on the MPC exists, it is possible to predict how consumption expenditure will change in response
to a change in disposable income (effected for example by a change in tax rates). Second, it
implies that the percentage of income saved increases as society becomes richer. This in turn
8/2/2019 Georges Project
17/29
17
suggests that in a growing economy a greater proportion of investment will be required to
maintain full employment income levels. Third it suggests that a transfer of income from high-
income to low-income consumers will raise the level of aggregate demand, since MPCs differ
between the two groups .Thus implicit in the Keynesian approach is a justification of progressive
taxation as a basis of income redistribution in conditions of surplus capacity.
The Keynesian consumption function provided considerable impetus to empirical investigation.
Early studies employing cross-section budget data appeared to support Keyness intuition in
almost every detail. Such cross-section data related the level of consumption to income levels for
different income groups, and in so doing tended to generate consumption functions remarkably
similar to that of Keynes giving a linear functional form.
Although the cross-section data lent some support to the Keynesian thesis, a number of earlytime series(that is, studies relating observation on consumption and income for specific groups
through time) raised fundamental questions. Kuznets (1946) classic study for example suggested
that consumption was a linear function of disposable income with a constant marginal propensity
to consume of approximately 0.9. This and other time series evidence implied that savings would
be a constant rather than increasing proportion of national income, thus combating the
pessimistic leanings towards stagnation. Furthermore it questioned whether redistribution from
upper to lower-income groups would have any impact upon the level on aggregate demand . This
apparent conflict in empirical findings provided a challenge to the generality of the absolute
income hypothesis and an impetus to further research directed at providing some plausible
explanation of why cross-section and time series results should offer such conflicting views of
the consumption function.
One of the earliest influential treatises which sought to modify the Keynesian consumption
function, and did so in such a way as to offer an explanation of the conflicting cross-section and
time series findings, was advanced by Duesenberry (1952). He argued that Keynesian analysis
focused on an inappropriate concept of income; he contended that, when explaining variations in
consumption, the relevant concept of income was not absolute income but relative income. By
relative income he had in mind the current disposable income of a consuming unit relative to
previous peak income, and current disposable income of that same consuming unit relative to the
current disposable income of other consuming units. The former of these two relativities is
8/2/2019 Georges Project
18/29
18
responsible for the so-called ratchet effect, that is, the idea that the consumption-income
relationship may be asymmetrical in so far as there are downward rigidities to the reduction of
consumption expenditure. The latter relativity has become known as the demonstration effect
and refers to the possibility that consumption decisions may be interdependent rather than
independent. This phenomenon is also known as keeping up with the Joneses.
If both of these effects are taken into consideration , it is possible to reconcile the findings of
cross-section and time series evidence. The relative income hypothesis can be presented in the
form of the following four propositions. In other words, to present clearly the four propositions
of the relative income hypothesis, we single out a household H from a group of households with
more or less the same level of income and analyze its consumption behaviour in response to
change in its income in relation to the income of other households.
If income of all households belonging to the group increases, then the consumption levelof all households of the group goes up at the same rate and vice versa. That is,
(MPC)
remains the same for all the households if their income changes by the same amount.
If household H remains at the same scale of relative income and its absolute income rises,then its absolute consumption and savings rise, but its MPC remains the same as it was
before the rise in its income.
If household H remains at the same scale of relative income (with income constant) andincome of the other households of the group increases, then MPC of the household H
with constant income increases.
If household H moves up from a lower income-group to a higher income-group then itsMPC decreases.
The last proposition supports the fourth property of Keynes absolute income hypothesis. Other
propositions of the relative income hypothesis make a significant deviation from the absolute
income hypothesis. Furthermore, both hypotheses have a similar view that when absolute
disposable income of households increases, their relative income remaining the same, then
consumption increases such that households average propensity to consume (APC) remain
constant and is equal to the MPC. However, the relative income hypothesis deviates from the
absolute income hypothesis on the question as to what happens when household income
8/2/2019 Georges Project
19/29
19
decreases. While Keynes holds that consumption decreases in proportion to decrease in income,
Duesenberry holds that consumption does not decrease in proportion to decrease in income
because of what he (Duesenberry) calls theRatchet Effect.
The ratchet effect arises due to households resistance against the fall in consumption following a
decrease in household income. Duesenberry argues that when absolute income increases,
absolute consumption increases but when absolute income decreases, the households do not
allow their consumption to fall in proportion to the fall in their incomes. It is so because
households get used to a certain standard of living in the long run and hence when their income
falls, their consumption falls less than proportionately. When consumption does not fall in
proportion to the fall in income, then APC rises and MPC falls. This is called the ratchet effect in
consumption behaviour.
The relative income hypothesis is illustrated in fig. 2.1. Let the long run consumption function be
given by the line CL = bY. Given the consumption function, suppose that, at a point of time in the
long-run, households have an income equal to 0Y2 out of which they consume CY2. At this level
of income and consumption, APC = CY2 / 0Y2. Now let the household income decrease in the
short-run to 0Y1. According to the absolute income hypothesis, the consumption would fall to
MY1 and APC = MY1/ 0Y1. In that case, APC will remain the same, i.e., MY1/ 0Y1 = CY2/ 0Y2.
It implies that the fall in the household consumption due to the fall in income would be
proportional.
According to the relative income hypothesis, however, the decrease in the household
consumption would be less than proportional because households resist the decrease in the
standards of living when there is a short- run decrease in their income. Therefore, their
consumption decreases but less than proportionately. This point is illustrated by the line C SC in
fig. 2.1. When income decrease from 0Y2 to 0Y1, the household consumption decreases, say, to
NY1, not MY1. Note that, according to the relative income hypothesis, the fall in householdconsumption due to the fall in income by Y1Y2 is lower. Given the CL = bY schedule, a fall in
income by Y1Y2 should have caused a decline in consumption by BM whereas it decreases by
only BN. Note that BN < BM. It means that ratchet effect causes a lower fall in consumption
than expected.
8/2/2019 Georges Project
20/29
20
The ratchet effect keeps the consumption at point N. When we join point N with point C, the
resulting line NC or CSC gives the short-run consumption function. Note also that AN is the
amount of dissaving. It implies that when household income falls, the households resort to
dissaving in order to prevent a large fall in their living standards. They do so to maintain their
living standards on par with their peer groups. This is an important point of distinction between
the absolute and relative income hypothesis.
Furthermore, it can be seen in Fig 9.2 that short-run average propensity to consume (APCS) is
greater than long-run average propensity to consume (APCL). At point N on the short-run
consumption function (CSC), APCS = NY1 / 0Y1 and at point M on the long-run consumption
function (0C), APCL = MY1/ OY1.
As the figure shows, NY1 > MY1. Therefore, NY1/ OY1 > MY1/ OY1. This proves that short-run
average propensity to consume is greater than the long-run average propensity to consume
Consumption
C = Y
CL=bY
C2 B C
CS N
A
C1 M
45o
O Y1 Y2
Disposable Income
Fig. 2.1 Relative Income Hypothesis
8/2/2019 Georges Project
21/29
21
Source: Dwivedi, 2005
Like absolute income hypothesis, the relative income hypothesis is also marred by its limitations,
though not significant enough to pose a serious challenge to the validity of the theory.
One, the relative income hypothesis states that an upward change in income and consumption is
always proportional irrespective of whether the change in income is small or large. The empirical
evidence, however, suggest that exceptionally large and unexpected increases in income are
often associated, at least initially, with less than proportionate increase in consumption. Two, the
relative income hypothesis states that consumption standards are irreversible. It, however, argued
that this proposition may hold in the short-run but not in the long-run. People cannot go on
dissaving in the long run in order to maintain the living standards at a level higher than
sustainable under the condition of decreasing income. That is, the consumption standard is
reversible in the long run. This criticism is, however, not very relevant because the relative
income hypothesis does not admit the reversibility of consumption expenditure with decrease in
income but less than proportionately. That is, reversibility argument of the critics matters only
with regards to proportionality. Three, the relative income hypothesis states that income and
consumption change always in the same direction. It implies that recession must always be
accompanied by a fall in aggregate consumption expenditure. There have, however, been
instances that during the 1948-49 in the US, consumption expenditure was rising while
disposable income was decreasing. Obviously, income and consumption had changed in opposite
direction. Such exceptions, however, do not reduce theoretical importance of the relative income
hypothesis because such cases are rare across the households.
It may, thus, be concluded that despite its criticism based on some minor empirical aberrations,
Duesenberrys relative income hypothesis is regarded as a significant improvement over the
absolute income hypothesis as it resolves certain paradoxes of the absolute income hypothesis.
The absolute income hypothesis relates household consumption to the current absolute income
and the relative income hypothesis relates it to the current relative income. Both these
hypotheses relate consumption to current income-absolute or relative. Milton Friedman rejected
the current income hypotheses and developed another theory on consumption, popularly known
as permanent income hypothesis. According to the permanent income hypothesis, it is the
8/2/2019 Georges Project
22/29
22
permanent income, not the current income which determines the level of current consumption
expenditure. Permanent income, defined broadly, is the mean of all the incomes anticipated in
the long-run. The method of estimating permanent income is an approximation of incomes
anticipated from all human and non-human wealth (or capital). In simple words, it means labour
income plus capital incomes. If all material, financial and human sources of income are treated
as wealth, then the permanent income of the current year can be defined as
YP = rW,
Where YP is the permanent disposable income with reference to the current year, W represents
overall wealth and r is the rate of return.
Friedman emphasizes that people experience random and temporary changes in their incomes
from year to year. He calls that part of income that people expect to persist into the future as
permanent income and the other part which people do not expect to persist into the future as
transitory income.
The basic proposition and assumption of the permanent income hypothesis can be stated
algebraically as follows.
CP = kYP. Thus, permanent consumption (CP) equals k proportion of permanent income(YP).
YM = YP + YT. Thus, measured income (YM) equals permanent income (YP) plustransitory income (YT).
CM = CP + CT. Thus, measured consumption (CM) equals permanent consumption (CP)plus transitory consumption (CT).
R1 (Y1t, Yp) = 0: Correlation coefficient (R1) between Y1t and Yp equals zero. R2 (C1t, Cp) = 0: Correlation coefficient (R2) between C1t and Cp equals zero. R3 (Y1t, C1t) = 0: Correlation coefficient (R3) between Y1t and C1t equals zero. Households with high permanent income have proportionally higher consumption.
The equations are self-explanatory. Yet the first equation needs some elaboration. It states that
permanent or planned consumption is a certain proportion (k) of the permanent income. The
8/2/2019 Georges Project
23/29
23
proportionality factor k needs not be a constant for it depends on demographic and ethnic factors,
interest rate, and the ratio of non-human wealth to permanent income..
Finally, the life-cycle theory of consumption, popularly known as life-cycle hypothesis was
developed by Albert Ando and Franco Modigliani in the early 1960s. Like Friedmans
permanent income hypothesis, the life-cycle hypothesis too rejects the Keynesian consumption
theory that the current consumption depends on the current income. The life-cycle hypothesis
postulates that individual consumption in any time period depends on resources available to the
individual, the rate of return on his capital, and the age of the individual. The resources available
to the individual consist of his existing net wealth and the present value of all his current and
future labour income. According to the life-cycle hypothesis, a rational consumer plans
consumption on the basis of all his resources and allocates income to consumption over time so
that he maximizes his total utility over his life-time.
The basic propositions of the life-cycle hypothesis can be summarized as follows.
The total consumption of a typical individual depends on current physical and financialwealth and his life-time labour income.
Consumption expenditure is financed out of the life-time income and accumulatedwealth.
The consumption level of a typical individual is, more or less, constant over his life -time.
There is little connection between current income and current consumption.The first and second propositions can be transformed into a life-time consumption function as
follows.
C = aWR + cYL
Where WR is real wealth, YL is labour income, a is MPC wealth income, and c is MPC labour
income.
To explain the life-cycle hypothesis, let us suppose that an individual expects to live for N years
with his retirement age at R. He starts working at the age of B, i.e. his working life equals R B
years. For simplicity sake, we assume also: (i) that the individual has no uncertainty about his
8/2/2019 Georges Project
24/29
24
longevity, employment and health condition; (ii) that he earns no interest on his accumulated
savings; (iii) that he does not consume his total labour income; and (iv) that prices remain
constant. With these assumptions, his life-time income is estimated as follows.
Life-time Income = YL (R - B)
Where YL is annual labour income, and (RB) is number of working life.
According to the life-cycle hypothesis, an individual plans his life-time consumption in such a
way that his life-time consumption equals his life-time income. Here the term life-time means
working life. Given the individuals expected life of N years and his planned constant (annual)
consumption (C), the consumption hypothesis can be written as:
C X N = YL X EL
By dividing both sides by N, we get the life-time consumption (C) as
C = EL/ N X EL/ N
Income/Consumption
WEALTH
INCOME
Y
C SAVING
CONSUMPTION DISSAVING
0 Retirement End of Years
begins years
Fig. 2.1: Life-Cycle Hypothesis
8/2/2019 Georges Project
25/29
25
The figure 2.1 above shows the life-cycle hypothesis. If the consumer smooth consumption over
his/her life (as indicated by the horizontal consumption green line), he/she will save and
accumulate wealth during his/her working years, and then dissave and run down her wealth
during retirement.
Like all other income-consumption theories, the life-cycle hypothesis too has its own
weaknesses. First, the life-cycle hypothesis has strongly been criticized for its strong
assumptions. The theory assumes that an individual has a definite vision of future size of his
income, the entire profile of his life-time income, availability of present and future credits, future
emergencies, opportunities and social pressures, present and future rates of interest and returns
on investment, and that he has a finely planned life. These assumptions are questionable. Second,
the life-cycle hypothesis assumes that the vision of the spending units right or wrong, correct
or incorrect has a high degree of certainty. The worlds experience is full of uncertainty in
economic life. Therefore, this kind of assumption is highly untenable. Third, this theory assume
that each individual has all the information he needs; can make all the fine and complex
calculation; mix rational decisions; and plans his present and future consumption so finely that it
can be repeated year after year. This is an unrealistic assumption. Finally and more importantly,
the empirical studies that have been carried to verify the life-cycle hypothesis do not produce
supporting evidence. Instead, most studies produce evidence contrary to the life-cycle theory
propositions.
2.2 Review of Empirical Literature
Various empirical studies can be found in these areas which are reviewed below.
Altonji and Villanueva (2007) report that the propensity to bequeath increases with lifetime
income. Agents care, not only about permanent income, but also about relative income which
provides straightforward explanation for this evidence in terms of interpersonal comparisons.
Erlandsen and Nymoen (2006) tested for the age structure effects on aggregate consumption in
Norway, by estimating a consumption function which takes account of changes in the age
distribution of the population. Their analysis was based on aggregate time-series data over the
period 1969-2004. They found that changes in the age structure of the population have
8/2/2019 Georges Project
26/29
26
significant and numerically important effect on Norwegian aggregate consumption. More
specifically, they found that aggregate consumption decreases when the share of the middle
aged, from (50-60 years) persons in the population increases. Their results, hence, give support
to the life-cycle model. Their findings implied that the changes in the age distribution of the
Norwegian po pulation may have significantly affected domestic demand and households
savings.
Raj (2005) used a cross-section to test the evidence on the absolute income hypothesis and the
permanent income hypothesis. The key objective of this research was to verify the stylized fact
that higher income households tend to save larger fraction of their income than lower income
households. From the 2003 household income and expenditure survey, the result obtained were
ambiguous and did not conform to the conventional theory in the strict sense. There was,
however, some indication that the lower income households were consuming higher proportion
of their income than the high income households.
Dynan (2004) find a strong positive relationship between saving rates and lifetime income.
Specifically, recent work by Dynan (2004) and Altonji and Villanueva (2007) provide strong
evidence of a saving rate that increases with permanent income, violating the proportionality
hypothesis.
Tan and Voss (2000) examined the relationship between private consumption expenditure and
wealth in Australia for the late 1980s and 1990s. For this period they identified a steady state
relationship between non-durable consumption, labour income and household wealth. Based
upon this relationship an increase in aggregate per capita income of one dollar was eventually
associated with a rise in annual non-durable consumption of approximately four cent. This was
somewhat smaller than other estimates but not inconsistent with economic theory. They also
estimated a short-run model of consumption and found that changes to household net non-
financial and financial wealth are an important determinant of consumption growth throughout
the 1990s particularly in recent years.
Raid (2000) investigated the main determinant of private consumption spending for the period
1969-1992. The econometric result showed that private consumption behaviour is strongly
affected by the current disposable income, previous level of disposable income, previous level of
8/2/2019 Georges Project
27/29
27
consumption and the changes in the current disposable income. The paper showed that, the
current domestic income, previous consumption spending, inflation, workers remittances, and
the political and economic instability are the main determinant of private consumption of Jordan
during the study.
Friedman (1957) and Branson (1972) investigated Keynes theory using a cross-section data.
They surveyed households and collected data on consumption and income at a point in time and
estimated the consumption function. The study supported Keynes prediction that MPC lies
between zero and one. They found that, current consumption expenditure was highly correlated
with income. Moreover, when the rich and the poor households were compared with each other
at one moment in time, the proportion of income saved increased along with income.
One empirical study by Hamburger (1955) reveals that the ratio of wealth to income is closely
correlated with the ratio of consumption to income, as judged by aggregate time-series data for
the inter war and post- World War II period.
Tobin (1951) made a comparative study of the absolute income and relative income hypotheses
based on four different sets of empirical data to find their empirical validity. His results do not
tell categorically which of these hypotheses has greater empirical validity. However, his findings
based on short-run budget, support absolute income hypothesis but not the long-run relation
between consumption and income. His own study was, however, been questioned too. In
addition, Tobin (1951) has recently examined the consistency of the relative income hypothesis
and the earlier absolute income hypothesis with a limited body of empirical evidence. Though he
finds neither hypothesis entirely satisfactory, he concludes that the weight of evidence favours
absolute income hypothesis and he tentatively suggest that changes in wealth may explain the
rough constancy over time in the fraction of income saved.
Kuznets (1946) used a trend data from 1869 to 1938 and discovered that the ratio of consumption
to income was remarkably stable from decade to decade despite large increases of the income
over the period. He obtained a long-run consumption function such that the long-run APC and
MPC were both constant. In other words, he discovered that APC was constant implying that
APC approximates MPC.
8/2/2019 Georges Project
28/29
8/2/2019 Georges Project
29/29
According to Ackley (1978), although permanent income hypothesis and life-cycle hypothesis
have earned a greater honour in recent years, for providing theoretical basis of empirical research
on consumption behaviour, this seems a victory by default. The honour accorded to these
theories because there is absence of serious competition and not because they have improved our
understanding of aggregate consumption. It is generally agreed that short-run consumption
function takes the form as C = a + bY (where Y is current income) and the long-run consumption
function as C = kYP (where YP is current income. There is, however, no conclusive evidence for
either form of these consumption functions.
In a nutshell, it is amply shown from the literature that income is the most important determinant
of household consumption. Other determinants identified in the literature include wealth, age,
workers remittances and others. This study is guided by these factors when formulating the
model.