General General SupervisionSupervision
Overview of State Performance Plan Indicators
15 – General Supervision20 – Timely and Accurate Data
This power point includes:This power point includes:
1. A description of each indicator;2. The SPP targets for each year and
whether our State met the targets;3. Any additional pertinent
information related to the indicator (if applicable);
4. A list of some of the improvement activities included in the State’s SPP/APR for the indicator;
5. A description of how the indicator might impact a district’s determination level (as described in WAC 392-172A-07012); and
6. Contact information for questions about the indicator.
General SupervisionGeneral SupervisionIndicator 15: The State’s
general supervision system (including monitoring, complaints, hearings, etc.) identifies and corrects noncompliance as soon as possible, but in no case later than one year from identification. (20 U.S.C. 1416 (a)(3)(B))
Data for this indicator are collected and maintained by OSPI’s special education department.
State Targets – Indicator State Targets – Indicator 1515
Year Target Actual Met Target?
2005-06 100% 100% Yes
2006-07 100% 100% Yes
2007-08 100% 100% Yes
2008-09 100% 100% Yes
2009-10 100% TBD TBD
2010-11 100% TBD TBD
Note: Since this is a Compliance Indicator, States are federally-required to set the target at 100% for all years.
Timely and Accurate DataTimely and Accurate DataIndicator 20: State-reported
data (including 618 and State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report data) are timely and accurate. (20 U.S.C. 1416 (a)(3)(B))
Data for this indicator are maintained by OSPI’s special education department.
State Targets – Indicator State Targets – Indicator 2020
Year Target Actual Met Target?
2005-06 (Different calculation was used in 2005-06)
2006-07 100% 98.3% No
2007-08 100% 95.5% No
2008-09 100% 100% Yes
2009-10 100% TBD TBD
2010-11 100% TBD TBD
Note: Since this is a Compliance Indicator, States are federally-required to set the target at 100% for all years.
Required Reports for Ind. Required Reports for Ind. 2020Annual Performance Report
(APR), including the required data and correct calculations for all 20 indicators;
Child Count (due February 1st);Personnel report (due November
1st);Educational Environments (due
February 1st);
Required Reports (cont.)Required Reports (cont.)
Exiting Data (due November 1st);Discipline report (due November
1st);State Assessment (due February
1st); andDispute Resolution (due
November 1st).
SPP/APR Improvement SPP/APR Improvement ActivitiesActivitiesHere are some of the
improvement activities included in our SPP/APR to address these two indicators:◦Model state forms were created to
assist districts with meeting compliance requirements;
◦Evaluation and IEP Technical Assistance Module, including numerous compliance areas, was developed and disseminated to school districts;
Improvement Activities Improvement Activities (cont.)(cont.)
◦District-level data across the SPP/APR indicators are posted to the web each fall;
◦Revision of reporting instructions, combined with regional trainings, to clarify the data reporting requirements;
◦Regional WAC trainings were conducted in the fall of 2007;
◦Develop/collect technical assistance resources across all twenty performance indicators and make available to LEAs and the general public on OSPI’s website;
Improvement Activities Improvement Activities (cont.)(cont.)◦New statewide process for timely
correction of non-compliance was implemented in 2008-09;
◦Ongoing training to districts regarding the collection and submission of data through the state’s data system;
◦Annual training and OSPI bulletins to districts addressing the required data collection process;
◦AND MORE…
Impact on DeterminationsImpact on DeterminationsIndicators 15 and 20 are both
compliance indicators. District performance related to
indicator 15 will impact a district’s determination level with regard to criteria 2 (timely correction of non-compliance).
District performance related to indicator 20 will impact a district’s determination level with regard to criteria 3 (timely and accurate data).
See the next three slides for more information…
Determination Criteria 2 – Determination Criteria 2 – Timely Correction of Non-Timely Correction of Non-compliancecompliance
Description Determination Level
If OSPI determined that non-compliance existed in the district with regard to indicator 15, the district corrected the non-compliance in a timely manner. (Note: this non-compliance would be any area of procedural compliance that is not tied directly to one of the other 19 performance indicators).
1 (Meets
Requirements)
The district corrected the identified non-compliance related to indicator 15, but did not complete the corrections within one year of notification.
3 (Needs
Intervention)
The district did not correct the identified non-compliance related to indicator 15 – uncorrected non-compliance still exists in the district.
4 (Needs Substantial
Intervention)Note: There are no determination level 2 criteria for this indicator.
Determination Criteria 3 – Determination Criteria 3 – Timely and Accurate DataTimely and Accurate Data
The data report must be both accurate and submitted on or before the required due date shown on the previous slide.
Description Determination Level
All of the required reports were on time and accurate.
1 (Meets Requirements)
4, 5, or 6 of the 7 reports were on time and accurate.
2 (Needs Assistance)
1, 2, or 3 of the 7 reports were on time and accurate.
3 (Needs Intervention)
None of the reports were on time and accurate.
4 (Needs Substantial
Intervention)
Contact InformationContact Information
For questions about indicator 15, contact Valerie Arnold at: [email protected]
For questions about indicator 20 and data reporting, contact Sandy Grummick at: [email protected]
For instructions regarding the required district-level data reports, visit OSPI’s website at:
http://www.k12.wa.us/SpecialEd/forms.aspx