IntroduThere areetc.) thru
Most are scenarios
As exampout that tgrowth ra
with a corsales dataline. The ‘decreased
The Internforecasts forecasts yellow do
1 Gardner, unbound.oignorance/2 World Echttp://www
Foreca
uctione a large numbexpert system
used to give . We will in t
ple we will usehere is a gooates (%) in wo
rrelation coefa. The observe‘model’ explad sales per pe
national Monfor expectedinto the ‘mod
ots in the grap
D & Tetlock, Porg/2011/07/1/ onomic Outloow.imf.org/exte
astingsa
ber of methoms and time s
single point fhe following
e a simple ford linear relatiorld GDP:
fficient R= 0.9ed data is givains expectedercent increas
netary Fund (I future changdel’ we ends ph above.
P., (2011), Over1/dan‐gardner
ok Database, Aernal/pubs/ft/w
P
alesand
ds used for foseries to caus
forecast or at take a look at
recast ‘modelion between
995. The relaten as green d sales as consse or decreas
MF) that kindge in World Gup with forec
rcoming Our Ar‐and‐philip‐te
April 2012 Editiweo/2012/01/
Page 1 of 7
dforeca
orecasting ransal methods (
most single pt the unusefu
l’ for net salesthe company
tion thus accodots in the grastant equal 16e in world GD
dly provided tGDP2 ‐ for the casts for net s
version to Acktlock/overcom
on; /weodata/inde
astingu
nging from ju(regression an
point forecasulness of such
s for a large my’s yearly net
ounts for almaph below, a638M and wiDP:
the historicalnext five yeasales for 2012
knowledging Oming‐our‐avers
ex.aspx
uncerta
udgmental (exnalysis etc.)1.
ts for a limiteh single point
multinationalsales in millio
most 99% of thnd the regresth 53M in inc
GDP growth ars. When we 2 to 2016 as d
ur Ignorance, hion‐to‐acknow
ainty
xpert forecas
ed number of forecasts.
company. It on euro and
he variation inssion as the gcreased or
rates also giv put these depicted by th
http://www.cawledging‐our‐
ting
f
turns
n the green
ves
he
ato‐
We know the forecabut how w
SothWwGp
Maybe we
ThepreGiven thethe futurevalues of
Since the from the to either snumber o
So even ifroom for rate of 3.5expected
Now we hshown tha
The forecare they?
that the probast of the GDwrong?
ome even pehe future NobWorld War. Wworthless, he weneral is wellanning purpo
e should take
edictionbae regression we GDP growthnet sales to f
variance of tmean of the sside of this mof observation
f the fit to theprediction er5%, is net salevalue.
have shown that the expect
asts we have
So m
bability for geP growth rate
rsist in using bel laureate K
When Arrow diwarned his sul aware the fooses." (Gardn
e a closer look
andwe can calculah rate. That isall. In the gra
he predictionsample value
mean. The banns the regress
e data is goodrors. In fact aes 1824M plu
hat the modeted relative er
So finally th
made is base
P
mission accom
etting a singlee is correct ‐ s
forecasts thaKenneth Arrowiscovered thauperiors againorecasts are nner & Tetlock,
k at possible f
ate a forecast the region waph below the
ns increases ths (used to cond will also wision is based
d, our regressa 95% confideus/minus 82M
el gives good rror(s) with h
he mission is
ed on forecas
Page 2 of 7
mplished! … O
e‐point forecaso the forecas
t are manifesw when he wat month‐longnst using themno good," he , 2011)
forecast error
t band for futwhere we withe green area g
he further nempute the reiden with decon).
sion is based oence interval fM. Even so the
forecasts, caligh probabilit
accomplished
sts of future w
Or is it really?
ast right is zests we so far
stly unreliablewas a young stg weather form. He was rewas told. "Ho
rs, input data
ure observath a certain prgive the 95%
ew forecasts fegression), thecreasing corre
on a very smafor 2012, wite interval is st
lculated the cty will be sma
d! … Or is it
world GDP gro
?
ro‐ even whehave will cert
e, an attitudetatistician durrecasts used bbuffed. "The owever, he ne
a and the fina
ions of sales grobability willforecast ban
for the GDP ge band will welation (R) an
all sample givh an expectetill only appro
confidence inall!
really?
owth rates, b
en assuming ttainly be wro
e encounteredring the Secoby the army wCommandingeeds them fo
l forecast.
given forecas expect new d:
growth rate liewiden as we mnd sample size
ving plenty ofd GDP growtox. 9% of the
terval(s) and
but how certa
that ong,
d by nd were g or
sts of
es move e (the
f h
in
TheGDForecastingrowth fopicturing
This fan c70, and 90
There is a“unpredicgrowth ra
The table confidenc
The IMF h
3 The InflatQuarterly B The MPC's Assessing tAutumn 20 4 Figure 1.15 As showninterval incdetails.
DPforecastng the future or the entire wthe uncertain
hart4 shows a0 percent con
lso another bctable”. The fates.
below showsce intervals:
has the follow
tion Report ProBulletin, Febru
s Fan Chart Inf
the MPC's Fan 005, pages 326
12. from:, Worn, the 70 percecludes the 50 a
tsgrowth in GDworld. The IMnty in their es
as blue colorenfidence inter
band on the can chart thus
s the actual fi
90%
2012 2.5
2013 2.1
wing commen
ojections: Unduary 1998, page
lation Report,
Charts By Rob6‐48
rld Economic Oent confidence and 70 percent
P
DP for any coMF has therefostimates.
ed bands the rvals5.
chart, implieds covers only 9
igures for the
Lower
% 70% 50%
5 2.9 3.1
1 2.8 3.3
ts to the figu
erstanding thees 30‐37.
May 2002, pag
b Elder, George
Outlook (April 2interval includt intervals. See
Page 3 of 7
untry is at beore supplied t
uncertainty a
but un‐seen,90% of the IM
e forecasted G
Baseline
%
1 3.5
3 4.1
res:
e Fan Chart By
ges 48‐49.
e Kapetanios, T
2012), Internatdes the 50 perce Appendix 1.2
est difficult anthe baseline f
around the W
, indicating a MF's estimate
GDP growth (%
Uppe
50% 70%
3.8 4.0
4.8 5.2
Erik Britton, Pa
Tim Taylor and
tional Monetarcent interval, ain the April 20
nd much moreforecasts wit
WEO baseline
10% chance es of the futur
%) and the lim
er
% 90%
4.3
5.9
aul Fisher and
Tony Yates, Q
ry Fund, Isbn 9and the 90 perc009 World Eco
e so for the Gh a fan chart3
forecast with
of somethingre probable
mits of the
John Whitley,
Quarterly Bullet
978161635246cent confidencnomic Outlook
GDP 3
h 50,
g
tin,
62. ce k for
“Rredan
Our approWorld Eco
This distriskewed wchart.
ThefinBy employsimulationrates and new obse
Risks around emain large airection. Infland S&P 500 o
oximation of tonomic Outlo
bution has: mwith a left tail.
alsalesfoying the samen compute thby using the
ervations. The
the WEO prond tilted to tation and oil poptions prices
the distributiook for April 2
mean 3.43%, . The distribut
Now
recastse technic thathe 2012 distriexpected var
e figure below
P
ojections havehe downside.price indicatos, however, po
on that can h2012 is shown
standard devtion thus also
w we are read
t we used to bution of netriance for thew describes th
Page 4 of 7
e diminished, . The various ors suggest dooint to upside
have producen below:
viation 0.54, mo encompasse
dy for serious
calculate thet sales forecase differences bhe forecast pr
consistent windicators doownside risks e risks.”
d the fan cha
minimum 1.2es the implied
forecasting!
forecast bansts, given thebetween forerocess:
with market ino not point into growth. T
art for 2012 a
22 and maximd but un‐seen
nd we can by e distribution ecasts using t
ndicators, but a consistent he term spre
s given in the
mum 4.70 – it n band in the
Monte Carlo of GDP growhe regression
t they
ad
e
is
wth n and
We howethe full rabelow:
This distri1590M an
So what a
Well, we n1890. Thesales in 20
We also k1955M.Bucontingen
ver are not onge of the di
bution of fornd maximum
added informa
now know the interval from012 ‐ se graph
know that we ut most imponcy planning f
nly using the stributions. T
ecasted net ssales 2055M
ation have w
at there is onm 1755M to 1h below givin
with 90% proortant is that wfor both low a
P
90% intervalThe final fore
sales has: me– and it is sli
e got from th
nly a 20% pro1890M in net g the cumula
obability will we have visuaand high sale
Page 5 of 7
for The GDP ecasts of net s
ean sales 1820ghtly skewed
he added effo
bability for nesales will the
ative sales dis
see actual nealized the uncs should be p
growth rate sales are give
0M, standardd with a left ta
ort?
et sales to been with 60% ptribution:
et sales in 201certainty in thperformed.
or the 95% fon as a histogr
d deviation 81ail.
e lower than 1probability co
12 between 1he sales forec
orecast band,ram in the gra
1, minimum s
1755 or aboveontain the act
1720M and casts and tha
, but aph
sales
e tual
t
AnunceThe Bank the uncerthe past h
This indicameasuremsupplying
If the growdistributioregression
BlackSBut all thiline in the
How wron
`“w
While statalways tratalking abassessme
ertainpasof England’s rtainty about has probabilit
ates that the ment errors. T this type of i
wth rates canon for net saln methods. If
wanss uncertaintye graph above
ng can we be
“As Donald Ruwhat we don't
tistic methodanslate into about risk, the nt is then nec
stfan chart frowhere we wety bands arou
values for paThis of courseinformation.
n be considerees given the Gf not other me
y was still not e.
? Often more
umsfeld oncet know we do
ds may lead uan accurate prlikelihood thacessitated an
P
m 2008 showere then ‐ seeund it:
ast GDP growte also holds fo
ed stochasticGDP growth rethods of est
enough to co
e wrong than
e said: it's not n't know.”
s to a reasonractical prediat some unfavd we are left
Page 6 of 7
wed a wide rae that the blac
th rates are uor the IMF his
the results arate still fulfilimation must
ontain what w
we like to thi
only what w
ably understaction capabilvorable or favonly with pro
nge of possibck line showi
uncertain (stostoric growth
bove will stillls the standat be consider
was to becom
ink. This is go
e don't know
anding of somity. When thavorable evenobabilities.
ble futures, bung National S
ochastic) or coh rates, but th
l hold, if the crd assumptiored.
me reality – sh
ood ‐ as in use
w ‐ the known
me phenomenat is the case,t will take pla
ut it also showStatistics data
ontains hey are not
conditional ons for using
hown by the r
eful ‐ to know
unknowns ‐
non that does, we find oursace. Risk
wed a for
red
w.
it's
s not selves
Afinalw
Sales formodels pthe predi
In today’importanchanges idifferenc
1. Fre
2. Ainre
3. D4. T
th5. N
The forecproduct(sactivitieshaving in
1. Afi
2. Tind
The ‘modusefulnes
Referen
Gardner,http://wwaversion-
World Echttp://ww
6 In this cas
word
recast modelpredictive anction of futu
’s fast movinnt element ofin key extern
ce between su
orecasts muesults.
Absolute forensight about esult
Detail does nThe forecast ihose are the
Never relay o
casts are usus), then the fs in differentn mind the co
All uncertaintinally end up
This uncertainnterest rates,istribution fo
del’ we havess as a foreca
nces
D & Tetlocww.cato-unb-to-acknowle
conomic Ouww.imf.org/e
se the probabi
s are an intenalytics. Predure events or
ng and highlyf the managenal and interuccess and f
st integrate b
ecast accurachow current
ot equal accuis often less things that s
on single poi
ually done infirm’s market geographic orrelation be
ty about the p contributinnty combine exchange raor the firm’s
e been usingast model is
k, P., (2011)ound.org/20edging-our-i
utlook Databaexternal/pub
ility distributio
P
grated part odictive analyr results6, usi
y uncertain mement procesrnal variablefailure:
both externa
cy (i.e. smallt decisions a
uracy with rimportant th
should be traint or scenari
n three stageset share(s) enmarkets the
etween mark
different mang to the unced with the uates, taxes ets equity valu
in the examtherefore sti
), Overcomin011/07/11/daignorance/
ase, April 20s/ft/weo/201
n of future net
Page 7 of 7
of our enterpytics can be ding present a
markets, forss. The abilit
es and adjust
al and interna
l confidenceand likely fut
respect to forhan the assumaced to proviio forecastin
s, first by fornding up witen the exercikets:
arket sizes, mcertainty in thuncertainty frtc. will even
ue.
mple have nevill debatable
ng Our Averan-gardner-a
012 Edition;12/01/weoda
t sales.
prise simulatdescribed as and past info
recasting havty to quicklyt tactics acco
al drivers of
e intervals) isture events w
recasts mptions andide advance ng
recasting theth a sales forse has to be
market sharehe forecast f
from other fontually be ma
ver been teste.
rsion to Ackand-philip-tet
ata/index.asp
tion models statistic mo
ormation and
ve become thy and accuraordingly can
f business an
s less importwill interact
d variables thwarning.
e market forrecast. If therepeated in
es and their cfor the firm’orecasted varanifested in t
ted out of sa
knowledgingtlock/overco
px
- as parts of odeling enabld data.
he single moately detect
make all the
nd the financ
tant than theto form the
hat underpin
r that particue firm has each market
correlation ws total sales.riables like the probabil
ample. Its
g Our Ignoraoming-our-
f the ling
ost
e
cial
e
it –
ular
t,
will
ity
ance,