STATE OF TRANSPORTATION
11
DRAFT June 27, 2011
3: Transit
Introduction
Public transportation systems directly benefit individuals, businesses, and governments by improving mobility and economic opportunities, while reducing road congestion, greenhouse gas emissions, and travel times within the region. The GRTC Transit System (GRTC) is the primary public transportation provider for the Richmond region, providing service to the City of Richmond, Henrico County, and parts of Chesterfield County. In 2008, GRTC received recognition from the American Public Transportation Association as the “Best Transit System in North American for 2008”.
GRTC Routes
GRTC operates a hub-and-spoke system with routes converging on the downtown area near the VCU MCV campus and government buildings along Broad Street. As of May 2010, GRTC operates 23 local bus routes and 12 express routes using 161 buses and cutaway vans. While the local routes provide local access via fixed route service, express routes provide direct service, on a limited stop basis, between downtown Richmond and residential and business areas in outlying jurisdictions.
Byrd Park
1
3
2
6366
82
62
62
62
63
7
93
91
372224
6
6
32
45
18
Laburnum Ave
North A
ve
Jahnke Rd.
James River Park/Ancarows Landing
Westwood Ave
Patterson Ave
Chippenham Parkway
Powhite Parkway
Hull St
Hull Stre
et Rd
Midlothian Turnpike
Crutchfield St
Semmes Ave
Walmsley Blvd
64
VCU Medical Centerat Stony Point 16
1
23
64
River RoadShopping Center
Chippenham Mall
21
101
63
102
Spring Rock Green Mall Southside Plaza
Hollywood Cemetery
University of Richmond
Stony Point Fashion Park
Carytown
Canal Walk
The Diamond
The Coliseum
Chippenham Square Mall
Children's Museum
McGuire VA Hospital
Regency Square Mall
Children's Hospital
Federal Reserve Bank
Va. Union University
Science Museum of Va.
Richmond Int'l Raceway
VA Museum of Fine Arts
VCU Monroe Park
Campus
Oliver Hill Court Bldg.
The Shops at Willow Lawn
EasterGovernm
1
2
2
34
4
10
11
16
19
22
22
24
24
32
34
62
62
62
63
67
70
70
70
71
71
71
72
72
72
73
73
73
74
74
91
101
93
28
64
64
6681
82
95
95
95
195
Belt Blvd
2nd
St
Buford R
d
17t
h St
Warwick Rd
Turner Rd
Cherokee Rd
Maury
St
1st S
t
Monument Ave
Com
mer
ce R
d
Osborne Tpke
Brook R
d
Jahnke Rd
uenot Rd
Forest Ave
Herm
it age Rd
Dil l Ave
Broad St Patterson Ave
N B
lvd
Skip w
ith Rd
Reams Rd
Cha
rles
St
Par
k D
r
Jacque St
Provid
ence
Rd
Grove Ave
5th
St
Meadow
bridge Rd
Bainbridge St
New Market Rd
Jefferson Davis H
wy
River Rd
ouse Rd
Whi
teh e
a d R
d
4th
St
4th St
360
250
1
1
1
301
150
76
73
195
197
3
5
1576
161
356
10
Mec
hani
csvi
lle T
pke
Forest Hill Ave
Ellwood Ave
Cary St
Cham
berlayne Ave
Dumbarton Rd
Cowardin Ave
She
ppar
d S
t
Quioccasin Rd
Ridge R
d
ree Chopt Rd
ples Mill R
d
Azalea Ave
Campus Dr
Cary Street Rd
Brookland Park Blvd
Fairfield Ave
Fairmount Ave
Douglasdale Rd
Glenside
Ham
ilton S
t
Harrison St
Leigh St
Libb
ie Ave
Mcc
loy
St
Mon
teiro
Ave
4th
Ave
Poe St
North Ave
Oakwood Ave
Wes
tove
r Hills
Blv
d
Germ
an School R
d
Willo
w La
wn D
r
Westwood Ave
Williamsburg Ave
Mos
by S
t
Bro
ad R
ock
Blv
d
Bro
ad R
ock
Rd
Hor
sepe
n R
d
James RiverJames River
93
37
6
2627
29
Vawter Street Park
Joseph Bryan Park
Maymont Park
James River Park
James River Park
Forest Hill Park
guenot Park
James River Park
Cheswick Park
Richmond NationaBattlefield Park
Battery Park
Powhite Park
Oregon Hill Park
Libby Hill Park
Carter JonesPark
Henderson Sports Complex
Broad Rock Sports Complex
Hotchkiss Recreat ional Area
Pollard Park
James River ParkHuguenot Woods
Clarke Springs Park
Montrose Heights Pa
Great Shiplock Park
Brown's Is land
ChimborazoPark
Gillies Creek Park
Figure 9: GRTC Routes
Ridership
As the primary public transportation provider within Richmond, GRTC has significant ridership and is depended on by many to provide necessary transportation. The chart below shows ridership trends for GRTC over a seven year period between 2003 and 2010. GRTC had its highest ridership rate in 2006 when it provided 10.74 million trips, and had its lowest ridership rate in 2003 when the system provided 9.15 million passenger trips. Since 2006, GRTC has consistently provided between 10.2 million and 10.4 million trips.
9,148,737
10,411,567
9,801,310
10,738,378
10,306,201 10,280,21210,444,498
10,193,867
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
GRTC Systemwide Ridership
YearRi
ders
hip
Source: GRTC, 2010
STATE OF TRANSPORTATION
12
DRAFT June 27, 2011
Availability of Bus Service
Figure 10 shows the GRTC Routes and their ¼-mile services areas categorized into five groups based on the level of service provided by each route. Groupings were determined by the average headways of each route and the hours each route serves. Routes with shorter headways and longer service times provide a higher level of service and, when headways are short enough, allow riders to use the service without being tied to a particular schedule. The general characteristics of each group are listed as follows.
Level 1. Routes with a long service span (18 hours or more) and short headways (often less than 20 minutes). This service level is nearly high enough that users could be schedule independent, meaning users could arrive at a bus stop without knowing the schedule as wait times between buses are relatively short.
Level 2. Routes with a long service span (generally 18 hours or more) and headways of 20 to 30 minutes on average. While headways are not high enough that users could be schedule independent, the service span and headways indicate a moderately good level of service.
Level 3. Routes with a medium to long service span (12-17 hours) and headways of 30 to 45 minutes on average. These routes provide a necessary service, but their headways mean users must be closely tied to the service schedule.
Level 4. Routes with a medium to long service span (12-17 hours) and headways of over an hour on average. These routes provide a necessary service, but their headways mean users must be closely tied to the service schedule. Typically, these routes have about 10-12 buses per direction per day.
Level 5. Special routes with either very long headways or very short service spans. Most of these routes have extremely limited service range or availability. Within the city, there are few of these routes that are not already overlapped by higher service level routes. Therefore, they are not shown in Figure 10.
As seen in Figure 10, the pattern of service indicates the highest levels of service along the Broad Street corridor and two Northside routes, 32 and 34. Additionally, service along Broad Street from Boulevard to Downtown is particularly high given how many bus routes overlap along this segment. Due to the branching and short turn-
backs of some routes, the frequency and thus the level of transit service tends to decrease the further from downtown one goes. Much of the Fan, Museum District, Church Hill, Randolph, Manchester and surrounding Southside neighborhoods, and the Chamberlayne Avenue, Jefferson Davis, and Patterson Avenue corridors all have moderately good Level 2 services. Areas with Level 3 services include Fulton Hill and Montrose Heights, as well as the Forest Hill Avenue, Grove Avenue, Monument Avenue, and Boulevard/Hermitage Road corridors. Areas with Level 4 service include much of Southside west of Belt Boulevard and the Forest Hill Avenue corridor west of Chippenham, due to branching of routes 62, 63, 70 and 71. Most of the city is within a ¼-mile of a transit route with Level 3 or higher service, but large swaths of the Southside are not. This is due in large part to the lower density of population in these relatively newer neighborhoods and commercial areas and to the more auto-dominated land use pattern in the western portions of the Hull Street, Midlothian Turnpike and Forest Hill Avenue corridors.
5
0 1 20.5
Miles
GRTC Service byService Level
Route1234
¼-MileService AreasLevel
Midlothian Tpke
Jefferson Davis H
wy
Hull Stre
et Road
Forest Hill Ave
Monument Ave
E Laburnum Ave
W Broad St
Mec
hani
csvil
le T
pke
Cham
berlayne Ave
!"e$
!"e$!"$%&f(
A¼
?¹
AcI²
Kß
I²
!"$
Kß
!"e$!"$
Ac
IqKÚ
IqKÚ
?f
?î
?ï
A
Ap
Ap
?õ
A¾I§
KÖ
AJames River
Figure 10: Transit Routes and Service Areas by Level of Service
The highest level of bus service is found in the Broad Street corridor and along some Northside routes.
STATE OF TRANSPORTATION
13
DRAFT June 27, 2011
RideFinders, CARE and C-VAN
In addition to providing fixed route public transportation service, GRTC also administers the RideFinders, Community Assisted Ride Enterprise (CARE) and the C-VAN programs. RideFinders is a regional program to reduce traffic congestion, improve air quality, and promote economic development and sustainabiltiy by promoting carpooling, vanpooling, park and ride usage, telework consultations, commuter guides, and many other services. RideFinders also promotes Travel Demand Management strategies through outreach to workers, assisting employers with developing tax-free transportation benefits programs and operates the Emergency Ride Home Program for commuters who bike, walk, carpool, vanpool, or take the bus to work at least three days a week. RideFinders currently has 108 operating vanpools and nearly 900 registered carpoolers.
The CARE program is a demand responsive, curb-to-curb paratransit service provided to Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) eligible persons with the City of Richmond, Henrico County and parts of Chesterfield County. C-VAN provides transportation assistance to participants in the Virginia Initiative for Employment not Welfare (VIEW) program. In Fiscal Year 2010, CARE services and C-VAN services carried 237,065 and 15,686 passenger trips, respectively.
Expansion Plans in Comprehensive Operations Analysis
GRTC completed a Comprehensive Operations Analysis (COA) in 2008 that laid out plans to expand current GRTC service over three phases. Phase I recommends simplifying the route structure and increasing service to neighborhoods by increasing route efficiency and productivity, while simultaneously reducing redundant and unnecessary service. Phase II calls for the construction of multiple transfer centers. The COA recommends building a downtown transfer center, along with neighborhood transit centers at Willow Lawn, Southside Plaza near Hull Street, and Belt Boulevard, and a Southside-Downtown center near Hull Street and Commerce Road. By constructing these transit centers, routes can converge at these destinations to facilitate bus transfers and reduce bus bunching along Broad Street. Phase III calls for a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system to be implemented along Broad Street between Willow Lawn Drive and the Rocketts Landing development in eastern Henrico County. The BRT system would improve transit operations along Broad Street and provide faster public transportation service along the Broad Street corridor.
LEGEND
!( Proposed BRT Stations
Proposed BRT Alignment
Half-Mile Buffer
Legend
!( !(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
STA
PLES
MIL
L
WIL
LOW
LAW
N
STA
PLES
MIL
L
SHA
FER
SHA
FER
ROCKETTS
LANDINGROCKETTS
LANDING
!"$!"e$!"$
!"e$
%&f(
A¼
The Shops at
Willow Lawn
HER
MIT
AG
E/M
EAD
OW
HA
MILT
ON
/I-1
95
ROBI
NSO
N
HER
MIT
AG
E/M
EAD
OW
HA
MILT
ON
/I-1
95
ROBI
NSO
NJames RiverPark System
VCU
JamesRiver
RockettsLanding
W BROAD ST
BOU
LEVA
RD
GROVE AVE
GROVE AVE
W CARY ST
E MAIN STE BROAD ST
DA
BNEY RD
W LEIGH ST
N 7
TH S
T
SEMMES
AVE
CARY STREET RD
BELVIDERE ST
MONUMENT AVE
WES
TMO
RELA
ND
ST
BROO
K ROAD
E LEIGH ST
MA
LVER
N A
VE
E CARY ST
CH
AMBERLAYN
E AVE
W FRANKLIN ST
N L
OM
BAR
DY
ST
COMMERCE RD
N 2
ND
ST
S 14TH
ST
S 9T
H S
T
NINE MILE RD
OLIVER H
ILL
FAIRFIELD AVE
HERM
ITAGE
MEC
HA
NIC
SVIL
LE T
PKE
WILLIAMSBURG AVE
N M
EAD
OW
ST
COWARDIN AVE
STAPLES
WES
TWO
OD
AVE
ROA
D
MILL RD
WAY
THO
MPS
ON
ST
OLD
O
SBORNE TPKE
Henrico CountyCity of Richmond
Henrico County
City of Richmond
!( !( !(
!( !(
!( !(
AD
AM
S
6TH
ST
REE
T
25T
H S
TR
EET
AD
AM
S
6TH
ST
REE
T
12T
H S
TR
EET
25T
H S
TR
EET
VCUMedicalCenter
CapitolSquare
!"e$A¼
!"e$!"$
MA
IN S
TR
EET
STAT
ION
MA
IN S
TR
EET
STAT
ION
9TH
ST
REE
T
3RD
ST
REE
T3R
D S
TR
EET
N 7
TH S
T
E MAIN ST
E CARY ST
N 7
TH
ST
BROAD ST
N 2
ND
ST
E LEIGH ST
S 14TH ST
E FRANKLIN ST
N 1
4TH
ST
18T
H S
TGRACE ST
N 9
TH
ST
E MAIN ST
E BROAD ST
JEFFE
RSON AVE
0 10.5
Miles ´0 0.20.1
Miles ´Proposed Broad Street BRT
Figure 11: Proposed Broad Street BRT Service (Under Study)
GRTC’s COA recommends a downtown transfer center, neighborhood transit centers and a BRT system for Broad
Street
Bus Rapid Transit corridor with median lanes,City of Nantes, France.
Bus Rapid Transit corridor example, Eugene, Oregon. Photos courtesy of Chris Phan.