Transcript
Page 1: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Evolution Towards Web 3.0:

The Semantic WebExperiences and Challenges on the Web and Inside Enterprises

Lee FeigenbaumVP Technology & Client Services, Cambridge Semantics

Co-chair W3C SPARQL Working [email protected]

for “Evolution Towards Web 3.0”, April 21, 2011

Page 2: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Agenda

• How did we get here?• Semantic Web: What and why• How is it used today?• Semantic Web challenges

Page 3: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Acknowledgement

Much material used gratefully with permission of Tim Berners-Lee. All opinions and conclusions are Lee Feigenbaum’s.

Page 4: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Web Evolution

1992 1993 1994

1st image on the Web

Debut of Mosaic browser

• Widespread success of Web 1.0– IMDB.com– PizzaHut.com– Whitehouse.gov– Lycos.com

• Universality: anything can link to anything

• Push information to users

Page 5: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Web Evolution

1994 1999 2004

IE7 has 1st complete AJAX stack

First Web 2.0 ConferenceHighlights User-Generated

Content

2006Web 1.0 is “here”.

Page 6: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Building Silos

• Web 1.0: The silo is the document

Page 7: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Building Silos

• Web 2.0: The silo is the application

Image originally from March 2008 issue of The Economist and used with permission of creator David Simonds

Page 8: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Penetrating Silos: Building the Data Web

Page 9: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Penetrating Silos: Building the Data Web

Page 10: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Penetrating Silos: Building the Data Web

Page 11: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Penetrating Silos: Building the Data Web

Page 12: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Penetrating Silos: Building the Data Web

Page 13: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Penetrating Silos: Building the Data Web

Page 14: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Penetrating Silos: Building the Data Web

Page 15: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Web Evolution

1994 20042001 2007Web 1.0 is “here”. Web 2.0 is “here”.

2009

• Semantic Web consumers include Google & Yahoo!

• Semantic Web publishers include Best Buy, NY Times, US and UK gov’ts

Page 16: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Web Evolution

1999 2001 2004 2008 20112007

RIF

16

Page 17: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

• “The Semantic Web”– Link explicit data on the World Wide Web in a machine-

readable fashion• …government data• …commercial data• …social data

– In order to enable…• …targeted, semantic search• …data browsing• …automated agents

Semantic Web – 1st view

World Wide Web : Web pages :: The Semantic Web : Data

Page 18: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

• “Semantic Web technologies”– A family of technology standards that ‘play nice together’,

including:• Flexible data model• Expressive ontology language• Distributed query language

– Drive Web sites, enterprise applications• Data integration• Business intelligence• Large knowledgebases• …

Semantic Web – 2nd view

The technologies enable us to build applications and solutions that were not possible, practical, or feasible traditionally.

Page 19: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Names

Page 20: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

• Semantic Web• Web of Data• Giant Global Graph• Data Web• Web 3.0• Linked Data Web• Semantic Data Web• Enterprise Information Web

Branding

Page 21: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Value propositions

• On the Web, the Semantic Web is about moving from linking documents to linking data

• What’s the value proposition within the enterprise?

Page 22: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Evolution to Semantic Web Inside Enterprises

Cathy

Relational Technology Semantic TechnologyCustomer Table

Cust ID Name City

394021-1454 Cathy Seattle

Purchased Items Table

Purchase-ID Cust-ID Item

P942-4294 394021-1454 iPad

Based on tablesRigid table stores only the things they’re

designed to storeMeaning (e.g. relationships) must come

from the user or be built into software

Based on a Web of dataCan accommodate new data as it arrivesUnderstandable by human beings & machinesComplements & builds upon traditional IT

purchased iPad

Page 23: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

The Semantic Web Paradigm

Page 24: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

The World Changes

Traditionally:Change is costly

Semantics:Change is cheap

Semantic Web Paradigm: Coping with Change

Flexible Graph Model

URIs for naming

Agility On-the-fly

RDB 1 RDB 2

Page 25: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Data Silos (structured, semi-structured, unstructured data)

ExcelEmailMySQLSybaseOracle

Integrated Enterprise Data

Response

Response

Response

QueryQuery

Query

…At and Beyond Enterprise Scale

Page 26: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Semantics Puts Data Within Reach of Domain Experts

Page 27: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

How is Semantic Web used today?

Page 28: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

We’re not here yet.

Image from Trey Ideker via Enoch Huang

Page 29: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

What is here today?

• Do you use Web 3.0 in your day-to-day life?

Page 30: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

The Linked Data Web, May 2007

Page 31: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

The Linked Data Web, March 2008

May 12, 2009 31

Page 32: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

The Linked Data Web, March 2009

32

Page 33: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

The Linked Data Web, September 2010

Page 34: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Semantic Web In Use: Social Data

• People, relationships– Friend Of A Friend (“FOAF”) – foaf:knows– Self-published or site-published (LiveJournal, hi5, …)

• Blogs, discussion forums, mailing lists– Semantically Interlinked Online Communities (“SIOC”)– Plug-ins for popular blogging & CMS platforms

• Calendars, vCards, reviews, … – One-offs

• Why don’t we have portable social networks? Yet?

Page 35: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Social Data Example

• Facebook Open Graph Protocol

Page 36: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Semantic Web In Use: Scientific Data

May 12, 2009 36

Page 37: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Example: Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery

What genes are involved in signal transduction and are related to pyramidal neurons?

Page 38: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

General search: 223,000 hits, 0 results

Page 39: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Domain-limited search: Still 2,580 potential results

Page 40: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Specific databases: Too many silos!

Page 41: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Linked Scientific Data: 32 targeted results

Page 42: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Semantic Web In Use: Enterprises on the Web

• Thesis: Describe your business more precisely and drive more (and better) traffic to your site

• Example: NYTimes publishes their article classification scheme as linked data

• Example: Best Buy, Overstock.com use RDFa to annotate product listings

Page 43: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Measurable Results

• 30% increase in search-engine traffic• 15% increase in click-through-rate for search ads

Page 44: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

• Many and Varied Applications Across Industries– Health care and pharma

• integration, classification, ontologies

– Oil & Gas• integration, classification

– Finance • structured data, ontologies, XBRL

– Publishing • metadata

– Libraries & museums • metadata, classification

– IT • rapid application development & evolution

Semantic Web In Use: Inside the Enterprise

Page 45: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Targeting High-Potential Opportunities in Pharma

Universe of considered

opportunities

High-potentialopportunities Mobile device

RegionalAnalyst

ProfileTerritory Preferredtargets

. . .

Per-analystrelevance filter

Page 46: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Delivering Dynamic, Data-driven Websites

The development of this new high-performance dynamic semantic publishing stack is a great innovation for the BBC as we are the first to use

this technology on such a high-profile site. It also puts us at the cutting edge of development for the next phase of the Internet, Web 3.0.

Page 47: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Semantic Web In Use: Government data

– Since January 2010, 2,500 (large) datasets published as Linked Data

– Since May 2009, 250,000 (smaller) datasets published (CSV, XML, …)

– RPI project to convert datasets toLinked Data

Page 48: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Tim Berners-Lee @ TED2010

http://www.ted.com/talks/tim_berners_lee_the_year_open_data_went_worldwide.html

Page 49: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Semantic Web challenges

Page 50: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web
Page 51: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Companies range from small, family-owned businesses to massive global conglomerates. But the challenges

faced by even the largest corporation pale in comparison to the scope of the challenges of building a

world-wide Semantic Web.

Page 52: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Economic Model

• What sustains Semantic Web applications in industry?

• What sustains the Linked Data Web?

• Are there viable economic models for Linked Data?

Page 53: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Big Issue: Motivation

• Retailers have clear motivation to put their data on the Web. But…

• …what if your business is data?– Thomson Reuters, Bloomberg, …

• …what if your business is your application?– Facebook, LinkedIn, Yelp, …

Page 54: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Scale

Web

Fortune 100 corp.

Page 55: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Data Quality

• Web 1.0 & 2.0 by necessity put a human between the information and its interpretation

• Web 3.0 queries, searches, and agents seek to automate this

Data quality is a challenge to automation

Page 56: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

1. Variable quality of uninterpreted source data– What are the highest cities in the US?

2. Variable quality of links and assertions about Linked Data

Data Quality – Two Issues

405,696,000m

Page 57: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Data Quality – Two Issues

• What ensures data quality on the Linked Data Web?

• Enterprises spend millions on data quality already– Knowledge management– Master data management– Governance and curation processes

• …though data quality issues do seep in when enterprises use Semantic Web to link to partners and public sources of data!

Page 58: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Trust

• How do we know which contributions to the Linked Data Web to trust?– Trust (distrust) the contributors?– Trust (distrust) the contributions?– Trust (distrust) the process?

• How is trust established within an enterprise’s Linked Data Web?

Page 59: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Adoption

Suggestion: Progress towards enterprise linked data requires far fewer people embrace Semantic Web technologies compared with a global Linked Data Web

Page 60: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

Other Challenges

• Data licensing• Open world assumption• Unique name assumption• Temporal data

• What other challenges can you think of?

Page 61: Evolution Towards Web 3.0: The Semantic Web

[email protected]

To learn more or to discuss the contents of this presentation, please contact me.


Recommended