1 Permission granted to cite, copy and distribute with attribution - Dr. Phil Hendrix - immr - www.immr.org
NewNew--toto--Market ProductsMarket Products-- immr Perspectives on Estimating Demand, Sizing Marketsimmr Perspectives on Estimating Demand, Sizing Markets
February 2010
Dr. Phil HendrixDirector, immr
Contact:www.immr.org1 (770) [email protected]
2 Permission granted to cite, copy and distribute with attribution - Dr. Phil Hendrix - immr - www.immr.org
“Missing the Mark” in New Product Research Costly
ProjectedDemand
from Market
Research
Significant
Moderate
Limited
Few Buy
Slow to Adopt, Sales Costly
Sales “Take Off,” Viral Demand
What Customers Actually Do
Type 2 Error: Underestimate Demand –Client Sits “on Sideline”
Type 1 Error:Overly Optimistic Projections – Premature Investment
Failure, Disappointment
Missed Opportunity
3 Permission granted to cite, copy and distribute with attribution - Dr. Phil Hendrix - immr - www.immr.org
New-to-Market Product Research is Challenging
Challenge ExplanationResulting ErrorsType 1
(Overestimate)Type 2
(Underestimate)
AdequatelyDescribing Concepts
Ø Brief, partial description requires respondents to “fill-in-blanks” ü üØ Drawbacks not mentioned, shown, or made explicit ü üØ Text-only description fails to convey aesthetic, design features ü üØ Respondent unable to experience, assess user experience ü ü
Consumers’ Understanding
Ø Respondents pay less attention, devote less effort to tasks ü üØ Key FAQs unanswered (in both research and real world) ü ü
Measurement Ø Reliability of single measures weak ü üØ Expected time of purchase not explicitly measured ü ü
ScenariosTested
Ø Purchase probability (stated/actual) depends on scenarios (features, pricing, availability, and other key aspects) ü ü
Ø Scenarios tested fail to take into account competition, constraints ü üMotivation Ø Respondents not motivated to be thoughtful, “accurate” ü üHurdles Ø Impact of hurdles in Conversion Funnel not taken into account ü üMarket Conditions
Ø Actual product differs from product(s) tested ü üØ Actual competitive offers differ from the offers tested ü üØ Actual shopping, deciding requires more effort than in research ü üØ Projections fail to take into account network, viral effects ü ü
4 Permission granted to cite, copy and distribute with attribution - Dr. Phil Hendrix - immr - www.immr.org
Why It’s Difficult to Succeed with New-to-
Market Products
5 Permission granted to cite, copy and distribute with attribution - Dr. Phil Hendrix - immr - www.immr.org
Category Examples of New-to-Market Products
Health Insurance
HSAs - A tax-advantaged spending and savings account that can be used to pay qualified medical expenses.
Media Amazon Kindle -A new type of portable reader that can wirelessly download books, newspapers, magazines, and blogs.
Consumer Electronics
MIDs (Mobile Internet Devices) - A new class of lightweight (1-3 lbs), handheld PC’s with 5-9” displays, powerful enough to run many applications
Transportation Zipcar - Provides cars that members in urban locations can rent by the hour.
Entertainment IPTV - Delivers TV broadcasts and video over the Internet, using a broadband connection.
Medical Stresseraser - An FDA-regulated medical device that relaxes the body and calms the mind using clinically proven biofeedback training.
New-to-Market Products, Services are DifferentCharacteristics of
New-to-Market Products
1. Customers’ first reaction is often “what is it?”
2. Usually do not readily fit into existing product categories
3. Often deliver benefits that are new, different from existing
4. Frequently described by features that are new, unfamiliar
5. Awareness low, familiarity with features and benefits even lower
6. Prospects unsure of questions to ask, criteria, options to consider
7. Limited adoption reduces opportunity to learn from others
8. Effort required by prospects to learn about, evaluate, and decide
9. Standards, features expected to mature, and prices drop over time
10. To adopt, customers must often change, learn new behaviors
6 Permission granted to cite, copy and distribute with attribution - Dr. Phil Hendrix - immr - www.immr.org
New-to-Market Products Challenging for ProspectsProduct Newness: Incremental New-to-Market Newness
Score
Ease of Categorizing
Does NP fit into an existing category, a new category, or span multiple categories?
Fits into Existing Category
Spans Multiple
Categories
Fits into a Category all
its Own
1 2 3 4 5
Comparability Does the NP deliver benefits comparable to those of existing products, or new benefits?
Delivers Established
Benefits
Delivers New
Benefits
1 2 3 4 5
Understandable Are NP’s features familiar or unfamiliar to customers?
Familiar Features
UnfamiliarFeatures
1 2 3 4 5
MeasurableAttributes
Is the NP evaluated primarily on objective or subjective attributes?
ObjectiveAttributes
Combination SubjectiveAttributes
1 2 3 4 5
Compatibity Does the NP require customer to change behavior (e.g., to purchase, install, or use)?
NoChange in Behavior
ModerateChange
Significant Change in Behavior
1 2 3 4 5
Trialability Can the NP be experienced easily, or does it require significant effort, commitment?
Low Cost/Effort
ModerateCost/Effort
High Cost/Effort
1 2 3 4 5
Total Newness Score ÜNewness Score
< 12 “Me Too” New Products13-18 Innovative New Products19-30 New-to-Market Products
7 Permission granted to cite, copy and distribute with attribution - Dr. Phil Hendrix - immr - www.immr.org
Prospects
Few Prospects for NTM Products Actually Buy
Need not compelling or
urgent
Significant,compelling
Need
Status Quo Acceptable
Dissatisfied with Status Quo
Might Recognize Need,
Solution
Aware of Need, Solution, Brand, and Messaging
Understands some Features, Unsure
about Benefits
Understands Key Features,
Benefits
Skeptical of Claims
Believes claims
Trial, Purchase Difficult
Trial, PurchaseEasy
Perceived Risks, Inertia, Competitors
Delay Purchase
Risks minimized;Incentives, Offers Trigger Purchase
Buyers
Holy Grail
TypicalScenario
Conversion Funnel
8 Permission granted to cite, copy and distribute with attribution - Dr. Phil Hendrix - immr - www.immr.org
Biggest Hurdle Ü Understanding Features, Benefits
Chasm For New-to-Market Products
Conversion Funnel narrows
sharply at...
... Understanding Key Features and Benefits
Conversion Funnel
9 Permission granted to cite, copy and distribute with attribution - Dr. Phil Hendrix - immr - www.immr.org
New-to-Market Chasm Slows Market Penetration...
Prospects
Buyers
... and dramatically drives up the cost of customer acquisition.
As the Buyer-to-Prospect
ratio shrinks...
...Time and Cost to Acquire Customers
Increase
Conversion Funnel
10 Permission granted to cite, copy and distribute with attribution - Dr. Phil Hendrix - immr - www.immr.org
NTM Chasm Dramatically Reduces Odds of Success
Source: immr analysis; Framework adapted from George Day, Is it Real? Can We Win? Is it Worth Doing? HBR, Dec. 2007
Likelihood of Success
New to Company
New Product’s
Relation to Company’s
Existing Products
Adjacent
OverlapsExisting
“Me too” Innovative New-to-MarketProduct Newness
60-75%
50-60%
40-55%
25-40%
5%
10%
Prospects slow to purchase, new-to-
market product stalls
NTM Chasm
11 Permission granted to cite, copy and distribute with attribution - Dr. Phil Hendrix - immr - www.immr.org
Insights about Doing Research on
New-to-Market Products
12 Permission granted to cite, copy and distribute with attribution - Dr. Phil Hendrix - immr - www.immr.org
Expectations, Hype Heighten the ChallengeFor Companies Introducing New-to-Market Products
Ü Expectations often unrealistically high within client team, among executives
Ü Considerable speculation, even hype, among industry analysts and observers
Ü Significant investments, big bets, and reputation often at stake
Ü Launch and results closely watched within the company and in the press
For Customers of New-to-Market Products
Ü For “really new” products, understanding, even classifying, difficult
Ü Information about NTM products often fragmented and conflicting
Ü Understanding features and benefits, comparing options onerous
Ü Initially, availability may be limited, requiring extra effort to purchase
Ü Being an “early adopter” can be risky
Ü Customers expect prices to drop over time Ü more costly to buy early
“Marketing often exaggerates the likely growth for a technology or service - adoption typically takes longer.” John Carey, CITI
"Unlocking [the potential] is proving more difficult than early entrants might have thought." Joe Laszlo, Jupiter Research
"Predictions are hard, especially when they are about the future." Yogi Berra
13 Permission granted to cite, copy and distribute with attribution - Dr. Phil Hendrix - immr - www.immr.org
Rigorous, Disciplined Approach Improves ValidityLearning Approach/Tool Description – Examples Available Upon Request
Present Concepts Clearly, Adequately
1 Concept Elaboration Adequately describe and explain concept, features so that respondents understand, can evaluate, and reliably decide (see p. 15)
2 Storyboards, Multimedia
Use storyboards and multimedia, as appropriate, to describe the concept, explain key features, and highlight benefits
3 Virtual Prototypes Especially when usability is “suspect,” develop virtual prototypes that allow consumers to interact with, “use,” experience product
4 faqfind™ Make additional information about concept readily accessible, track how consumers access and use as they “shop” and decide
5 Qualitative Pretest Verify “usability” of concept descriptions, materials, and research tasks
Obtain Valid, Robust Measures
6 Incentive Compatible Motivate respondents to be “truthful” in answering “will you buy?”
7 Visualization Prompt respondents to visualize whether, when, how they might use
8 Robust Choice Models Match choice methodology to objectives, task, competitive realities
9 User-friendly Choice Tasks
Create “highly usable” choice tasks using IA (Information Architecture) principles (navigation, iconography, format, colors, etc.)
10 Timing measures Measure when respondents are most likely to adopt
11 Adoption Barriers Uncover barriers to adoption (e.g., contract, switching costs, etc.)
CalibrateModels
12 Correct for bias Correct for bias in Choice, Diffusion modeling
13 Disaggregate models Estimate models at segment level (a priori and derived)
ValidateFindings
14 Post-hoc Qualitative Conduct post hoc qualitative research to answer “why?” more fully
15 Track Behavior, Measures
Track measures, update model as competitive conditions change
14 Permission granted to cite, copy and distribute with attribution - Dr. Phil Hendrix - immr - www.immr.org
Elaborating Concepts for Testing is CriticalGoals of Concept Elaboration
Ü Describe and explain concept concisely, in plain terms easily understood by the average provide consumer
Ü Provide enough information so that respondents can reliably evaluateÜ Guide development, selection of images and multimedia that can efficiently
communicate and reinforce the textual description
Concept Elaboration – Key Elements to Specify
Name* A descriptive name that captures/conveys the essence of the concept
Tagline A memorable phrase that captures/conveys the key benefit(s)
Target Description of who is likely to find it most useful? Why? "How would I know it's for me?"
Description* With as few words as possible, describe the concept. In as few sentences as possible, describe what "job" it does. In quantitative research, make a more complete description available to respondents throughout survey as pop-up (accessed by clicking ▲).
Explanation In as few words as possible, explain how the concept works. Answer the question, “Why should I believe the claim(s)?”
Benefits* What are the key benefits? What problem(s) does the concept solve?
Reference How is it similar to/different from what I'm familiar with, accustomed to, currently using, etc.?
Requirements What do I have to do to purchase, install, or use the service? (e.g., equipment required; where the service can be used; any drawbacks or limitations that need to be considered?)
* Required; other elements optional, but likely to be useful in developing other materials (especially illustrations, faqfind)
15 Permission granted to cite, copy and distribute with attribution - Dr. Phil Hendrix - immr - www.immr.org
Quantifying Demand for NTM Products – Toolkit
Adoption Model for “Very New Products”
Develop questions, hypotheses using theory of characteristics that influence adoption:• Need(s), priorities• Awareness, familiarity• Curiosity, skepticism• Ability/willingness to pay
Better Measures, Understanding
Storyboards and Virtual Prototypes
Use storyboards, virtual prototypes so that respondents can:
• “Experience” product/service• Understand its benefits• Assess usability/user experience• Envision usage scenarios
Realistic Interaction, Responses
Adaptive CBC(Choice-based Conjoint)
Develop, present sets of offers to respondents by varying product and service features (including price) Use adaptive approach to distinguish “must haves” from features willing to “trade-off”
Accurate “What if” Predictions
faqfindTM
Develop, present user-friendly set of FAQs to respondents
As respondents access FAQs, track information accessed, viewed by each respondent
Summarize, relate FAQs to choices, adoption, WTP
Reveals “Need to Knows”
Demand Model
Estimate model to predict:• Market Potential• Time to adopt• Demand under various
assumptions, scenarios• Price elasticity, impact of
other key drivers
Business Case Projections
ProspectSegmentation
Identify segments using LC/ummixing. Profile in terms of:• Size, potential• Purchase probability• Adoption triggers• Demographics• Optimal Positioning
Pinpoint Real Opportunities
16 Permission granted to cite, copy and distribute with attribution - Dr. Phil Hendrix - immr - www.immr.org
About the Author
Dr. Phil HendrixDirector, immrwww.immr.org+1 (770) [email protected]
Dr. Phil Hendrix is the founder and director of immr, a research and consulting firm focused on “very new” product and market opportunities. He specializes in helping organizations identify, verify, and capitalize on opportunities for products that are new-to-customers and very often new-to-market. Dr. Hendrix has developed perspectives and research-based tools to uncover customers’ unmet needs, reveal hurdles slowing adoption, trigger interest and accelerate purchase, and determine features and pricing to maximize market penetration. He has extensive experience adapting and applying research approaches, both qualitative and quantitative, to amplify weak market signals and help clients innovate successfully.
Phil has led significant engagements with numerous startups (such as Company.com) and multiple business units of Fortune 100 clients in telecommunications (AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, Sony Ericsson, and others), financial services (American Express), transportation (UPS), insurance (Allstate, United Healthcare), healthcare (US Oncology), and others. He has worked closely with senior management and client project teams on issues ranging from “traditional marketing” (segmentation, positioning, branding) to innovation, user experience, and customer retention. Over the course of his career, Phil has helped clients conceive and successfully launch dozens of new products, businesses, and brands. He has extensive experience in B2C and B2B (SMB) markets. He is also a frequent speaker at industry and academic conferences.
Phil brings a unique combination of academic rigor, strategic perspective, and hands-on experience to his work. Before founding immr, Phil was a partner with DiamondCluster (strategy and technology consultancy), founder and head of IMS (Integrated Measurement Systems), and a principal with Mercer Management Consulting. He has held faculty and research positions at Emory University and the University of Michigan, where he taught courses in research design and analysis, buyer behavior, and marketing strategy, and the Survey Research Center at U. of Michigan. After receiving his PhD in marketing from the University of Michigan, Dr. Hendrix completed post-doctoral studies in applied statistics and mathematical psychology.
17 Permission granted to cite, copy and distribute with attribution - Dr. Phil Hendrix - immr - www.immr.org
immr’s Focus – Research on New-to-Market Products• Inspiration (principals/inventors)• R&D/Technology enablers• Customers
- Unmet needs- Feature fatigue- Lead users
• Ideation/brainstorming- Worst customers- Worst competitor
• Lead markets• Open Innovation/
Global sourcing
• Opportunity to leapfrog• Market (size, growth, potential,
addressable market)• Competitive advantage(s)
(significance, duration) • Access to technology/IP• Scenario analysis• Risk profile
• Build or buy• Perpetual beta• Market experiments
(learn and scale fast)• Real options• Doubling down• Leveraging network effects• Unlocking demand• Triggering viral effects• Avoiding the new-to-market chasm
• Features (must haves, tipping points) and WTP†
• Platform implications• UI/UE (user experience)• Time-to-market• Alliance and channel partners• Business model innovation• Positioning
SourceIdeas
CraftWinning Value
Proposition
What new markets can we pursue, exploit?
How do we win the prize?
Whichopportunitiescan we own?
What must we do to win?
VetOpportunities
UnlockDemand
Research that
Answers
†Willingness-to-pay
18 Permission granted to cite, copy and distribute with attribution - Dr. Phil Hendrix - immr - www.immr.org
Recent Publications