8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
1/37
ESP Teachers Perceptions of Business EnglishCourses
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate ESP teachersperceptions of Business English
courses. Specifically, this study aimed to explore how teachers planned Business English courses,
how they developed studentscompetence and skills, and how they continued their professional
growth. A qualitative approach was used to frame the inquiry of this study. The participants were
seven Business English teachers at one technological university in Southern Taiwan; four of them
were from the Applied English Department and three from the International Business Department.
Data were collected through interviews, classroom observations, and field notes. Major findings
of the study were as follows: First, in course design, Business English teachers would develop
studentsbusiness knowledge and improve their English communication skills. Second, students
English ability, business background knowledge, attitude, communication skills, independent
thinking ability, and flexibility were all considered important by Business English teachers, with
a view of helping students meet the needs of the job market. Third, teachers read relevant news or
magazines to absorb new business knowledge, and attended business seminars or enrolled in shortterm
business programs to improve their teaching abilities. Fourth, some teachers agreed with
the idea of increasing teaching hours of Business English in order to provide more professional
training programs for students. Fifth, teachers suggested that instructors from industry could be
hired as part-time Business English teachers to bridge the gap between classroom learning and the
real world. Based on the findings of this study, the implications for Business English teaching and
http://tiespj.tespa.org.tw/?p=555http://tiespj.tespa.org.tw/?p=555http://tiespj.tespa.org.tw/?p=555http://tiespj.tespa.org.tw/?p=5558/12/2019 ESP Teachers
2/37
learning and suggestions for future research were addressed.
Keywords: Business English, English for Specific Purposes (ESP) teachers
ESP TeachersPerceptions of Business English Courses
* I-Chen Chen & Hung-Chang Wu
Department of Applied English
Southern Taiwan University of Science & Technology, Taiwan
20 I-Chen Chen & Hung-Chang Wu
1. Introductionn
English for Specific Purposes (ESP) is a movement based on the proposition that
language teaching should be tailored to the specific learning and language use needs of
identified groups of students (Johns & Price-Machado, 2001). In Taiwan, the growth
of ESP in the past several years has been rapid and striking (Lo, 2011). Institutes and
universities of technology in Taiwan are aware that it is crucial to cultivate students
English ability as well as improving specific English competence to meet their future
needs in the world of high technology and to allow them to participate in international
affairs. Many language learners are eager to study field-specific English in order to
increase their competitive competence or pursue their careers.
The characteristics of ESP courses could be divided into absolute characteristics
and variable characteristics (Dudley-Evans & St. John, 1998). The absolute
characteristics suggest that ESP is designed to meet the specific needs of learners; in
addition, the content of the activities and materials as well as the language instruction
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
3/37
may focus on specific fields. The variable characteristics suggest that ESP may be
related to or designed for specific disciplines and that it is likely to be designed for
adult learners, either at a tertiary level institution or in a professional work situation.
ESP is a goal-directed, effective and professional training curriculum (Carter &
Nunan, 2001; Robinson, 1991). The goals, objectives, and content of ESP courses are
related to meeting the requirements of learnerscommunicative needs in real settings
(Carter & Nunan, 2001; Lai, 2005).
An ESP curriculum, especially Business English courses, is provided in various
universities in order to improve studentsoccupational English ability. For Business
English instructors, design an appropriate curriculum is always a challenge because
they have to understand studentsreal needs (Johns & Price-Machado, 2001), as
is the choice of appropriate materials. In addition, Business English courses are
offered in different departments such as Applied English and International Business.
English major students and Business major students have different characteristics,
strengths and weaknesses. Therefore, it is important to discover how Business English
instructors rearrange or adjust the design of their Business English courses when their
students are from different departments.
TIESPJ, Vol. 5:1, 2013 21
The purpose of this study was threefold. First, it aimed to explore how ESP
teachers planned Business English courses. The techniques and strategies which
teachers used to prepare for Business English courses were explored. Second, it
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
4/37
attempted to investigate how Business English teachers helped students meet the
needs of the job market. The researchers explored how Business English teachers
helped students develop the competence and skills in order to meet job requirements.
Third, it attempted to find out how Business English teachers continued their
professional growth. In order to further understand what characteristics an effective
Business English teacher needed, the researchers explored how they continued their
professional development. In addition, Business English teachers were encouraged
to offer their suggestions to improve the quality of Business English education. The
research questions were addressed as follows:
1. How do Business English teachers plan courses?
2. How do Business English teachers develop studentscompetence and skills?
3. How do Business English teachers continue their professional growth?
2. Literature Review
2.1 The Development of Business English
The development of Business English, a subdivision of ESP, began in the 1960s
(Dudley-Evans & St. John, 1998). The main reason for the development of Business
English was the massive expansion of international business. Pickett (1989, p.1)
explained that Business English is a mediating language between the technicality of
particular business and the general language of public.Dudley-Evans and St. John
(1998) indicated that Business English can be divided into specialist English and
General English. According to these authors, we understand that the component of
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
5/37
Business English might include specific English and general English. Specific English
refers to communicating among business projects with many business terminologies
and General English refers to communicating with the general public.
In the 1960s, the education of Business English mainly focused on teaching
specialist vocabulary and terminology in specific business sectors (Cordeanu et al.,
22 I-Chen Chen & Hung-Chang Wu
1998). In the 1970s and 1980s, the Business English education came to focus on
various language skills training, especially on developing learnerscommunication
ability (Ellis & Johnson, 1994). Cordeanu et al. indicated that Business English
courses should (1) provide enough specialist content, (2) develop good communication
skills in business fields and general situations, (3) notice culture differences, and (4)
develop the ability of cross-cultural communication. The ability of communication
becomes more and more important after the 1990s (Cordeanu et al., 1998; Dudley-
Evans & St. John, 1998; Pickett, 1989).
Business English courses are one type of content-based course. Content-based
instruction integrates the learning of language with the learning of specific content.
Content should be a vehicle to drive language learning (Hadley, 2001). In a contentbased
course, the language is the skeleton, while the content is the flesh and blood;
the language could be seen as a means to complete a content task (Chen, 2010).
Business English includes both training for English proficiency and the development
of business knowledge. Learners learn the language used in business contexts, such as
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
6/37
office communication and contract negotiation.
2.2 Elements in Business English Course Design
Needs analysis. The analysis of learnersneeds is always the first priority in
Business English course design (Harding, 2007). Identifying learnersneeds can be
divided into three parts: target situation analysis (TSA), present situation analysis
(PSA), and learning situation analysis (LSA) (Dudley-Evans & St. John, 1998). Target
situation analysis refers to learnersneeds; that is, what the learner has to know in
target situations. In TSA, the reasons for (1) why the language is needed, (2) how the
language will be used, (3) what the content areas will be, (4) who the learner uses
the language with, and (5) where the language will be used need to be analyzed and
discussed in detail (Hutchinson & Waters, 1987). For instance, a learner attends an
intensive Business English conversation course because he needs to go abroad to
attend international conferences. The learner may need to talk with native English
speakers in meetings or in the office. Therefore, outside agencies (companies or
instructors) determined the learnersneeds.
TIESPJ, Vol. 5:1, 2013 23
Present Situation Analysis refers to what learners currently lack; that is, what the
learner does not know. In PSA, the reasons for (1) what the learners proficiency level
is, (2) what skills the learner wants to improve most urgently, (3) whom the learners
use the language with, and (4) where the language is used need to be analyzed and
discussed (Hutchinson & Waters, 1987). For instance, a Business English learner with
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
7/37
poor speaking ability needs to communicate with native-English speakers when the
learner goes abroad to visit clients. For this reason, the learners present deficiency
needs to be discovered so that the learner is directed to appropriate training programs.
Learning Situation Analysis refers to learnerswants; that is, what the learner
feels he or she wants. Learnerswants are determined by their own perceptions. In
other words, the learner might have some background knowledge of their needs.
Therefore, needs are determined by learners in LSA (Hutchinson & Waters, 1987).
Teaching materials. The needs of learners help the instructor to make decisions
on designing or selecting materials (Belcher, 2006). Tang (2006) proposed that good
teaching materials for Business English should address the needs of the students,
reflect the latest information or news on business, create simulated, life-like business
circumstances, and encourage independent thinking and problem-solving abilities.
In addition, Tsai (1998) indicated that the choice of materials would have at least
three effects on the process of the class. First, materials will determine what kinds
of language skills students will be exposed to. Second, materials will affect students
learning method. Third, materials will affect studentslearning motivation. Tsai also
suggested that instructors choose a commercial textbook which provides extensive
materials when students with mixed backgrounds attend Business English classes.
Besides textbooks, authentic material is another choice for students from different
departments, and it is difficult for instructors to find an appropriate textbook to meet
every students needs. The qualified authentic materials should (1) be compatible with
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
8/37
the syllabus, (2) provide alternative choices for instructors and students to reflect their
needs, (3) meet the level of studentslanguage skills, and (4) enjoy good feedback
from people who have used them (p. 801).
Role of teachers. Several scholars discussed the characteristics of effective ESP
teachers. Dudley-Evans and St. John (1998) proposed that an ESP teacher played
24 I-Chen Chen & Hung-Chang Wu
five different roles: teacher, collaborator, course designer and materials provider,
researcher, and evaluator. In order to meet the specific needs of the learners, teachers
must in the first place closely work together with field specialists. Moreover, an
effective ESP teacher should foster a learner-centered environment (Tudor, 1996).
He does this by taking into account the needs and preferences of his learners, by
filling gaps between the classroom materials and the real world, and by building
communication communities for learners to use English in the real world (Lai,
2005). In addition, in order to keep the course up-to-date with constant changes in a
knowledge domain and to assist learners in their professional development, effective
ESP teachers should be providers of authentic teaching materials (Dudley-Evans &
St. John, 1998; Hutchinson & Waters, 1987) and counselors that provide first-hand
information about the job market (Anthony, 1998; Tudor, 1996).
It has been argued that many Business English instructors were General English
instructors (Kao, 1992; Lai, 2005; Huang, 2007). Huang (2007) indicated that
instructors needed to continually absorb the latest information and news on business
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
9/37
and enhance their professional knowledge. Instructors should be encouraged to read
business news and magazines, so as to improve their professional knowledge and
cultivate an awareness of the latest developments worldwide.
2.3 Empirical Studies on Business English
Some studies investigated the needs of Business English learning. Tsui (1992)
found that non-native English speaking managerial staff, who worked in the Science-
Based Industrial Park in Hsinchu, Taiwan, felt the need to improve their Business
English communication skills. Improving learnerslistening and speaking abilities
have become a primary concern for instructors of Business English courses (Firth,
1995). However, Chang (2000), in a study of Business English courses, reported
that writing and reading were regarded as important language skills because learners
needed to write business letters. Tsai (1998) investigated studentsneeds in Business
English courses and discovered that students needed to improve their English ability
before absorbing business background knowledge. The result was consistent with the
TIESPJ, Vol. 5:1, 2013 25
findings of other studies (Huang, 2007; Lai, 2005) that studentslow general English
proficiency was a huge barrier to acquiring professional English.
Regarding teachersand studentsperceptions of ESP courses, Tsao (2011)
carried out a study which surveyed 351 studentsand 23 university instructors
attitudes toward ESP. The results showed that teachers and students had different
views about the effectiveness of an ESP course. Students considered their needs, their
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
10/37
learning capacity, and their learning motivation as the top-ranking factors. In contrast,
the teachers emphasized the importance of the course itself, placing teaching materials
and methods as the top concerns, and course objectives and student needs the second.
Shen (2009) also investigated teachersand studentsperceptions of ESP courses and
found that studentslow English language competence and ESP teachers experiences
were the factors affecting the effectiveness of ESP courses. However, these studies
focused on perceptions of ESP courses in general, while little attention has been
paid to teachersperceptions of Business English courses specifically. Therefore, the
current study contributes to the field of Business English teaching and learning.
3. Research Method
A qualitative research method was used to investigate teachersperceptions of
Business English courses in this study. The selection of participants, data collection,
and data analysis are described below.
3.1 Participants
Purposeful sampling was used to select the teachers who taught Business English
courses at a technological university in Southern Taiwan. The logic of purposeful
sampling lies in selecting information-rich cases for study in depth (Patton, 2002).
Seven Business English teachers participated in this study. Table 1 shows the
demographic information of the teachers. Each teacher was given a unique code (T1-
T7). Four teachers (T1, T4, T6, T7) were from the Applied English Department and
three teachers (T2, T3, T5) were from the International Business Department. Two
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
11/37
teachers had masters degrees from a College of Business; four of the others had
26 I-Chen Chen & Hung-Chang Wu
masters degrees in teaching English as a second or foreign language (TESL/TEFL),
and the seventh teacher had a Ph.D. in English literature. Five of the seven teachers
had at least four years of work experience in the business field.
Table 1. Demographic information of the participants
Code Educational
background Teaching courses
Years of
teaching
experience
Years
of work
experience
in the
business
field
T1
(Applied English
Dept.)
English
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
12/37
Literature
Financial English
Contract English
Business English
Writing
9 4
T2
(International
Business Dept.)
Marketing
Management
Business English
Writing 6 7
T3
(International
Business Dept.)
Applied
Linguistics
Business English
Tourism English 2 0
T4
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
13/37
(Applied English
Dept.)
TESOL
Business English
Writing
Business English
Business
Communication
10 10
T5
(International
Business Dept.)
Economics Business English 1 4
T6
(Applied English
Dept.)
TESOL
Financial English
Business
Communication
Business English
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
14/37
Writing
5 0
T7
(Applied English
Dept.)
TESOL
Business Presentation
Business Speaking
and Listening
8 4
TIESPJ, Vol. 5:1, 2013 27
3.2 Data Collection
Multiple data sources included interviews with teachers, classroom observations,
field notes, and a review of teaching materials.
Interview. The researchers interviewed each teacher once or twice depending
on the teachers availability (see interview guide in Appendix A). Teachers were
asked to share the reasons why they entered the field of Business English, how they
prepared for the courses, how they selected or designed teaching materials, and what
competence they thought students should have in order to meet the needs of job
markets. In addition, the interview also focused on teachersprofessional growth, such
as how they improved their own ability and how they solved problems in teaching
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
15/37
Business English. At the end of the interview, teachers were encouraged to offer
suggestions to improve the domestic education of Business English.
Observation. Non-participant observation was used in this study. The purpose of
classroom observation was to understand what curricular activities were carried out
in the classroom, including the focus of the lesson and the content taught to students.
In addition, how teachers delivered subject matter knowledge to students and how
teachers responded to studentsneeds were also observed.
Teaching materials. All the teachers, except Teacher 1, used different textbooks
for their students. Each textbook offers various topics on business articles and
communication skills. Teacher 1 did not use a textbook, but prepared materials using
financial or other relevant news articles from CNN and business magazines.
3.3 Data analysis
The data collected from the interviews and classroom field notes were analyzed
by the content analysis method, identifying, coding, and categorizing the primary
patterns in the data (Patton, 2002). Coded data were organized into five sub-topics: (1)
teacherscurricular planning, (2) teachers views of the needs of the job market, (3)
teachersopinions of curriculum arrangement, (4) teachers professional knowledge
development, and (5) their suggestions to improve the domestic education of Business
English. Each sub-topic is elaborated in the next section.
28 I-Chen Chen & Hung-Chang Wu
4. Findings & Discussion
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
16/37
4.1 Teacherscurricular planning
Curricular content. Determining what to teach seemed a big question for every
teacher. All of the teachers agreed that Business English courses included business
knowledge and English language. Teacher 1 stated:
Perhaps we could separate this question into two layers. One is the concept
layer,and the other is the practice layer.The concept layer refers to the
construction of basic background knowledge and the practice layer refers to the
projects or business letters one has to accomplish in the workplace. Both of the
two layers are essential for students because one cannot write a formal business
letter well without any business background knowledge. On the other hand, it is
hard for a person to understand a Business English document well even though
his or her business knowledge is perfect (Interview, March 24, 2010).
Teachers 1, 3, and 7 proposed that studentsEnglish proficiency is the key point
for them to study Business English. Studentspoor English ability would be the barrier
in studying professional English (Huang, 2007; Lai, 2005). Teacher 7 explained:
If we talk about undergraduate students (learning Business English), I think what
they need is general English, not Business English. Because if they want to learn
the vocabulary used in the field or if they want to understand formal and informal
speech, they have to have a fairly advanced level of English ability. If they don t
have the basis, teaching Business English is not going to work (Interview, May
12, 2010).
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
17/37
Regarding the role of the four language skills in teaching Business English,
Teachers 1, 4, 6, and 7 believed that all of the four language skills were important
for Business English learners. A previous study by Hsieh (2001) who examined how
and what to teach in Business English suggested that both oral and written skills
TIESPJ, Vol. 5:1, 2013 29
should be emphasized in Business English courses. Teachers 3 and 5 believed that
communicative skills were more useful than reading and writing skills. Therefore,
listening and speaking skills were their primary concern when they taught Business
English courses (Firth, 1995). Teacher 5 further indicated that students who graduated
from the English Department preferred to use more difficult words and complex
sentences when writing a business letter; however, her work experience told her that
most supervisors only expected key points in a letter, written in simple language.
On the other hand, Teacher 2 believed that reading and writing skills were more
important. This result was supported by Changs study (2000) that reading and writing
were important language skills because learners needed to write business letters.
Making sentences more polite and culturally appropriate was one of his teaching
purposes when teaching Business English courses for Applied English major students.
Teachers 1, 2, and 3 indicated that English major students usually had better
English ability than business major students. Teachers 4, 5, and 6 also pointed out
that business major students had better business background knowledge than English
major students. This finding was consistent with a previous study, Chen and Wu (2010).
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
18/37
Chen and Wu found that students from English departments indicated their main need
as enhancing business knowledge, while students from business departments wanted
to improve their English conversation ability. Therefore, in course design, Teachers
1, 2, 4, and 6 would develop Applied English major studentsbasic business concepts
and awareness. As Teacher 1 explained, Basic background knowledge often plays an
important role when learners communicate with their co-workers in the workplace
(Interview, March 24, 2010). For Business College students who enrolled in Business
English courses, Teacher 1 suggested that they should read more business documents
written in English. Teacher 1 said:
I believe that most business major students know what Letter of Credit, L/Cis.
However, they are possibly familiar with the Chinese version. We may have an
English version as our material. At this time, we only need to focus on English
instruction because the background knowledge of Letter of Credit could not bring
us big problems (Interview, March 24, 2010).
30 I-Chen Chen & Hung-Chang Wu
In addition, Teachers 5 and 7 suggested that Business English instructors should
investigate studentsneeds at the beginning of the semester so that instructors have the
opportunity to design more appropriate curriculum for their students.
Instructional goals. Business English teachers had their own requirements for
their students. Teachers 2 and 3 believed that students should have basic reading
and writing ability after taking the Business English course. Teacher 5 separated her
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
19/37
students into two groups. One was an English major students group; the other was a
business major students group. English major students should have the ability to write
a formal English business letter. Business major students should have the ability to
use English to accomplish a task such as introducing a business company. Teacher 4
focused on learning achievement and learning direction. She stated:
Around 8 years ago, my teaching requirement was simple; that is, I would judge
whether the student can be accepted by a business company. If he or she met
the requirement, I would let the student pass. Recently, this standard needs to be
changed because many of my students who enroll on my Business English courses
are not senior students but sophomore and junior students. Therefore, I expect that
my students find the right way of learning. I will not fail my students if they are on
the right direction and they are willing to learn (Interview, April 28, 2010).
Teacher 1 indicated that he used to have a high expectation for his students,
but he lowered the standard recently because many students enrolled on the course
with varied proficiency levels. English major students could pass the course with
basic business knowledge, and business major students as long as they have basic
communication ability. On the other hand, Teachers 6 and 7 hoped that their students
enjoyed the learning process. They did not ask their students to achieve any specific
goals but to attend every class.
To help students achieve the goals, all seven teachers suggested various ways
for students to learn more effectively. All of the teachers agreed that students needed
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
20/37
to pay attention during the class. Teachers 1, 4, and 6 suggested that English major
TIESPJ, Vol. 5:1, 2013 31
students should read more business related articles, business magazines, and financial
news in order to develop their business awareness. Teachers 1, 3, 5, and 7 expected
students to work on their English ability by themselves outside class. Teachers 2 and
4 indicated that efficiency is important in the job market. They expected their students
to finish the assignments on time.
Teaching materials. Teachers were encouraged to express their thoughts on
the Business English textbooks to see if they meet the needs of university students.
Teachers 3 and 6 were satisfied with the current Business English textbooks. They
indicated that there were many choices on the market. On the other hand, Teachers 1,
2, 4, 5, and 7 were dissatisfied with the current Business English textbooks. Teacher
1 indicated that it was no easy task for the authors of Business English textbooks to
meet various studentsneeds and it was hard to blame those authors and publishers
because the fields of Business English were wide and complex. Teacher 2 pointed out
that the quality of Business English textbooks on the market needed to be improved
because the writing styles of many textbooks sometimes seemed strange. Teacher
4 showed a Business English textbook to the researcher that contained various
surprising mistakes. She stated:
There are various situations in different job markets. The context in Taiwan is
actually different from that in other foreign countries. We have our own strategies
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
21/37
when we face different situations. Some textbooks are from England. I dont
say they are incorrect. However, they are inappropriate for students who learn
Business English in Taiwan because the situations in England and in Taiwan are
very different (Interview, April 28, 2010).
Teacher 5 expressed the same opinion as Teacher 4 that there were few textbooks
which were appropriate for students in Taiwan. There are many choices on the
market, but it is hard for a teacher to choose a good one,she said (Interview, May
5, 2010). These teachers were concerned with providing good teaching materials
for students. This finding was supported by previous researchers: Dudley-Evans &
32 I-Chen Chen & Hung-Chang Wu
St. John (1998) and Tsao (2011) both noted that effective ESP teachers should be
providers of authentic teaching materials. Those teachers who were dissatisfied with
the textbooks suggested that teachers needed to design supplementary handouts by
themselves to compensate for the lack of appropriate textbooks. Otherwise, the gap
between the job market and studentslearning would be large.
4.2 Teachersviewpoints of needs of the job market
There is a wide range of jobs available on the market. What knowledge and
competence should students have in order to meet the needs of the job market?
Overall, Teachers 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 believed that studentsEnglish ability was important
when they hunted for jobs. Teachers 1 and 4 also suggested that every student should
supplement his or her own existing abilities. For English major students, enhancing
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
22/37
basic business background knowledge would be a plus. For business major students,
improving English ability would make him or her more competitive.
On the other hand, Teachers 5 and 7 believed that English is only a tool for
communication or dealing with documents. Attitude and independent thinking ability
were much more important than English ability. Instructor 5 stated:
I believe deeply that an active attitude is very important. Nowadays, many
students and employees are too passive. This is not a good phenomenon. A
competent employee should demonstrate his or her active attitude to his or her
job. In addition, independent thinking ability is important, too. Your supervisor
will not tell you everything. You often need to figure it out by yourself (Interview,
May 5, 2010).
Teachers 3 and 7 indicated that communication skills, social skills and flexibility
were important, too. Students needed to understand the skills of talking and getting
along with people. I imagine that the future job market in Taiwan is going to involve
many changes and these changes will be rapid. If you are not flexible, you are going
to miss out,Teacher 7 said (Interview, May 12, 2010).
TIESPJ, Vol. 5:1, 2013 33
4.3 Ways of developing studentscompetence and skills
Reading business articles, group discussion, conversation practice, and writing
exercises were the main activities adopted by teachers to develop students English
ability and business knowledge, as observed in the Business English classes. For
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
23/37
example, Teacher 1 developed studentsability to read the formal language used in
business agreements and contracts. At the beginning of the class, he drew a flowchart
on the blackboard to explain the business or financial concept, and then he guided
students to read the articles. He explained the meanings of words used in business
contracts as well as some sophisticated sentence patterns in business documents.
According to him, reading those articles without paying attention to the sentence
patterns would not improve studentsability to read business agreements and
contracts. He often checked studentsunderstanding by asking questions. If students
failed to give the correct answer, he would explain again and make it clear by giving
more examples (Observational field notes, March 30, 2010).
Teacher 4 introduced the international trade process and business communication
styles to students. She tried to discuss the current issues in the business world with
students in English. She encouraged students to describe what they thought in
simple English during the class. When students had difficulty expressing themselves
without translation, she offered some sentences to help these students or encouraged
them to explain in another way. At the end of the class, she assigned homework to
students because she expected her students to review what they learned in the class
(Observational field notes, April 29, 2010).
Teacher 6 taught students the strategies used to manage conversations in business
contexts. She divided students into groups to work on business tasks such as opening
a meeting, agreeing and disagreeing with others, giving and explaining reasons,
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
24/37
and closing a meeting (Observational field notes, May 6, 2010). On the other hand,
Teacher 2 developed studentsknowledge and skills in writing business letters. After
his lecture, he asked students to do in-class exercises. He gave students a model of a
formal business letter and asked students to write a similar one in class. Students had
to finish the task within the time limit since efficiency is important in the workplace,
according to him (Observational field notes, April 14, 2010).
34 I-Chen Chen & Hung-Chang Wu
4.4 Teachersopinions of curriculum arrangement
The field of Business English includes a mass of knowledge and English skills for
students to learn. However, students only had two to three hours of Business English
a week. We wondered if it was appropriate for the course to be separated into several
courses so that various teachers might provide more professional training programs
for students. When teachers were asked to express their opinions on this question, all
of them deeply thought for a while. Teachers 1, 2, 5, and 6 agreed that one Business
English course should be separated into several courses so that students have the
opportunity to receive various Business English training programs. Teacher 1 stated:
Separating the Business English course into several training courses is an
excellent suggestion. Actually, only one or two of the courses cannot provide
a complete framework to the field. If we have more time to teach our students,
we could offer more information about the job market to our students. The
gap between school education and the needs of job market could be narrowed
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
25/37
(Interview, March 24, 2010).
All of the teachers who agreed with the suggestion indicated that the teaching
hours of the course were so limited that they were unable to offer enough information
for their students. Teachers 3 and 5 also pointed out that it was very difficult for
instructors to improve studentsBusiness English ability in a course which only has 2
to 3 hours per week. If the teaching hours could be increased, students would have the
opportunity to receive more complete training (Shen, 2009).
However, there were some instructors who disagreed or partly disagreed with the
suggestion. Teacher 4 suggested that business major students should not necessarily
have to attend many courses to develop their business awareness. They needed to
improve their English ability. Teacher 7 also disagreed with the suggestion. He stated:
Not necessary. Its always a question that there are only two hours a week. Its
not really what happened in class which is important. What is important is how
TIESPJ, Vol. 5:1, 2013 35
much students learn when hey leave the class. What do they do in their leisure
time? I think two hours a week is enough (Interview, May 12, 2010).
Teachers who disagreed with the suggestion tended to believe that students
needed to make more efforts on their own.
4.5 Teachersprofessional knowledge development
All of the teachers admitted that they encountered difficulties in teaching
Business English because this course included broad business knowledge and English
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
26/37
skills. Teacher 1, who had taught Business English courses for more than 9 years and
worked in business for more than 4 years, explained:
For general English teachers, they may encounter professional knowledge
problems. On the other hand, teachers from the Business College also face
language and teaching problems. Actually, we are facing the dilemma of choosing
appropriate teachers (Interview, March 24, 2010).
When these teachers had any problems on professional knowledge, they often
tried to figure them out by themselves at first. Teachers 2, 4, and 5 would prefer
to solve their problems by consulting reference books. Teachers 1, 3, 6, and 7
often surfed the Internet to collect the resources they needed in order to solve their
problems. All of the teachers would ask their friends or teachers who were involved in
business fields to solve their problems when self-learning and Internet resources could
not help them figure out their problems.
It seemed that instructors with business background knowledge had fewer
problems with professional knowledge. However, Teachers 2 and 5, who have
masters degrees in marketing and economics, indicated that the field of business
knowledge was so wide that they sometimes had problems understanding new
concepts. Business knowledge includes economics, accounting, marketing, etc. It was
very difficult for a teacher to master every business field.
36 I-Chen Chen & Hung-Chang Wu
Therefore, both English background and business background teachers had
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
27/37
problems understanding business knowledge. Teachers need to keep learning and
reading relevant news or magazines so as to absorb new business concepts.Teacher
1 said (Interview, March 24, 2010).
Teachers 1, 3, 5, and 6 indicated that professional business knowledge is not a
leading role in the Business English course. In this course, we only offer very basic
concepts for our students to understand the business article,Teacher 3 said (Interview,
March 31, 2010).
Teachers 2 and 6 believed that English was not a huge barrier for Business
English teachers because undergraduate students would not enter high-level Business
English courses. They also indicated that instructors who were willing to teach the
course should have good English ability. Perhaps the problems of lack of business
knowledge are tougher than English language problems,both Teachers 2 and 6 said
(Interview, May 5, 2010).
Teachers 1, 3, 5, 6, and 7 suggested that Business English instructors should read
magazines such as Business Weekly and the Economist so as to develop their business
knowledge. In addition, they are advised to read financial and international news as
frequently as possible. These strategies would help teachers to enhance their business
knowledge (Huang, 2007). Teacher 2 suggested that attending some business seminars
or enrolling on short-term business programs was helpful for Business English
teachers to improve their teaching ability. Teacher 4 suggested that case study and
business textbooks are good resources for Business English teachersself-learning.
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
28/37
4.6 Suggestions for improvements to Business English in Taiwan
Teachers 1 and 2 suggested that the education of Business English in Taiwan
should be more systematically organized in order to make studentslearning more
effective. Teacher 1 stated:
When instructors teach the course, they should consider the teaching goals and
purposes. Nowadays, we only worry that our students cannot find a job after they
TIESPJ, Vol. 5:1, 2013 37
graduate from the university. However, the real problems are what students can do
when they get the job. We should consider these problems (Interview, March 24, 2010).
Teacher 2 also agreed that the course should be more systematically organized.
Otherwise, students would feel disoriented, which might waste a lot of learning
resources and time. Teachers 3 and 6 indicated that there were too many students
in a class. There should not be more than 30 students in one class,Teacher 3
said. Teacher 5 suggested that instructors from industry could be hired as part-time
Business English teachers to offer some practical skills so that the gap between theory
and practice could be narrowed.
Teachers 3 and 5 believed that instructors who had relevant work experience
were more qualified to teach Business English because they were more competent to
provide useful information for their students. Teacher 1 also indicated that instructors
with work experience in business might share their work experience with students.
These practical experiences are precious lessons for their students. Teachers 2 and 4
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
29/37
also believed that instructors with business experience were more confident to teach
the course.
All of the teachers agreed that studentsEnglish proficiency should be improved
as a matter of urgency. If studentsEnglish proficiency was low, it would be very
hard for them to learn Business English well. Generally speaking, Year 3 and Year 4
studentsEnglish proficiency was better than that of Year 1 or Year 2. Therefore, it
was believed that the senior year would be the best time for students to take Business
English courses (Hsu, 2006).
5. Implications of the Findings
This study investigated teachersperceptions of Business English courses,
including teacherscurricular planning, ways of developing studentscompetence
and skills to meet the needs of the job market, and teachersprofessional knowledge
development. Based on the findings of this study, some suggestions are proposed for
improving Business English teaching and learning.
38 I-Chen Chen & Hung-Chang Wu
First, it is suggested that students need to improve their English ability in order
to study Business English well. The administrators of the school programs are
encouraged to arrange Business English courses for senior students because senior
students usually have better English ability. Sophomore and junior students whose
English proficiency level is above intermediate are eligible to take this course. As Hsu
(2006) indicated, the second semester of the senior year is the best period for students
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
30/37
to learn Business English. Senior students enter the job market after they graduate
from universities and are expected to apply what they have learned in Business
English classes in employment.
Second, teachers with business experience were dissatisfied with the current
Business English textbooks, and they suggested that instructors from industry could
be hired as part-time Business English teachers to share practical work experience
with students. Collaborative teaching (Shen, 2009; Wang, 2004) would be a strategy
to help students integrate business knowledge with practical skills, and thus narrow
the gap between classroom learning and the real world.
Third, it is suggested that the teaching hours of Business English should be
increased so that teachers can provide more professional training programs for
students. Case studies, role play and simulation (Huang, 2007; Jones, 1995; McGarry,
1998; Yang, 2001), and collaborative task-based instruction (Chen, 2005) are good
strategies to provide practical training for students. Case studies help students to
understand current business trends. Role play and simulation help students to practice
the language used in business situations. Collaborative task-based instruction enhances
studentscreativity and cooperation through simulation businesses established by
learners.
6. Limitations and Suggestions for Future Research
Since the participants in this study were English teachers at the same university, a
greater variety of teachers who teach in other universities could be taken into account
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
31/37
in future studies. However, this study has provided useful information concerning
Business English teacherscourse planning, teaching strategies, and their professional
TIESPJ, Vol. 5:1, 2013 39
growth. It is suggested that the qualitative findings of this study could be used to
develop the content of a questionnaire for a broader survey on teachersbeliefs and
perceptions of Business English courses.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express appreciation to the seven teacher participants
in this study. Their willingness to participate through interviews and observations
made this study possible.
References
Anthony, L. (1998). Defining English for specific purposes and the role of the ESP
practitioner. Center for language research 1997 Annual review, 115-120.
Retrieved January 29, 2013, from
http://www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/abstracts/Aizukiyo97.pdf
Belcher, D. D. (2006). English for specific purposes: Teaching to perceived needs
and imagined futures in worlds of work, study, and everyday life. TESOL
Quarterly, 40,133-157.
Carter, R., & Nunan, D. (2001). The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers
of other languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chang, H. F. (2000). A study of Business English course in technology and vocational
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
32/37
school. Selected Papers from the Ninth International Symposium on English
Teaching, 167-177. Taipei: Crane Publishing Co.
Chen, I. C., & Wu, H. C. (2010). EFL university studentsperceptions of Business
English courses. STUT Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4, 161-194.
Chen, Y. C. (2010). Content-based Business English course for EFL. The Internet
TESL Journal, 16(1). Retrieved May 30, 2013, from
http://iteslj.org/Lessons/Chien-BusinessEnglish.html
Chen, P. C. (2005). Effectively implementing a collaborative task-based syllabus in
EFL large-sized Business English classes. ESP World, 10. Retrieved January 29,
2013, from http://www.esp-world.info/Articles_10/CTBS_.htm
40 I-Chen Chen & Hung-Chang Wu
Cordeanu, A., Ivanescu, R., & Stefan, R. (1998). Teaching Business English. Prosper,
14-18.
Dudley-Evans, T., & St. John, M. J. (1998). Development in ESP-A multi-disciplinary
approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, M., & Johnson, C. M. (1994). Teaching Business English. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Firth, A. (1995). Introduction and overview. In Firth, A. (Ed.), The discourse of
negotiation: Studies of language in the workplace. Oxford: Pergamon.
Hadley, A. O. (2001). Teaching language in context. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Harding, K. (2007). English for specific purposes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
33/37
Hsieh, L. T. (2001). Business English: How and what to teach. Journal of National
Pingtung Institute of Commerce, 3, 59-70.
Hsu, J. Y. (2006). The last course in college: Business English writing (
). Caves English Teaching. Retrieved
February 26, 2013, from
http://www.cavesbooks.com.tw/e_magazine/e_magazine_article.aspx?
language1=0&sn=181
Huang, H. H. (2007). Problems and suggestions in Business English teaching at
institutes of technology. Journal of Chungyu ( ), 13, 83-89.
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learningcentered
approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johns, A. M., & Price-Machado, D. (2001). English for Specific Purposes (ESP):
Tailoring courses to students' needs-and to the outside world. In M. Celce-Murcia
(Ed.) Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 43-54). Boston:
Heinle & Heinle.
Jones, N. B. (1995). Business writing, Chinese students, and communicative language
teaching. TESOL Journal, 4(3), 12-15.
Kao, S. W. (1992). Teaching Business English in Taiwan: A problem review. China
Junior College of Industrial and Commercial Management, 13, 16-51.
Lai, C. Y. (2005). A study on applied English department studentsneeds for taking
English for specific purposes courses and studentsperceptions of an effective
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
34/37
TIESPJ, Vol. 5:1, 2013 41
ESP teacher. Unpublished Masters Thesis, Southern Taiwan University of
Science and Technology, Taiwan.
Lo, Y. H. (2011). ESP versus EGP: A case study of an ESP program for vocational
high school students of Tourism. Taiwan International ESP Journal, 3(2), 71-
100.
McGarry, R.G. (1998). Professional writing for business administration: An adjunct
content-based course. TESOL Journal, 7(6), 28-31.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand
Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Pickett, D. (1989). The sleeping giant: Investigations in Business English. Language
International, 1, 5-11.
Robinson, P.C. (1991). ESP Today: A Practitioners Guide. New York: Prentice Hall
International.
Shen, S. U. (2009). Investigating the perception toward ESP course: a case study
of ESP teachers and students at Chaoyang University of Technology. Unpublished
masters thesis, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taiwan.
Tang, P. (2006). A call for the communicative teaching of EIB. Sino-US English
Teaching, 3(7), 22-25.
Tsai, M. J. (1998). A course design for Business English. The Proceedings of the
7th International Symposium on English Teaching, 797-808. English Teachers
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
35/37
Association of the Republic of China. Taipei: Crane Publishing Co.
Tsao, C. H. (2011). English for specific purposes in the EFL context: A Survey of
student and faculty perceptions. Asian ESP Journal, 7(2), 126-149.
Tsui, C. J. (1992). English business communication skills training needs of non-native
English-speaking managers: A case in Taiwan. The Bulletin of the Association for
Business Communication, 60(1), 40-41.
Tudor, I. (1996). Learner-centeredness as language education. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Wang, Y. C. (2004). Business English courses at the institutes of technology: Problems
and a tentative model of team teaching. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation,
Tamkang University, Taiwan.
42 I-Chen Chen & Hung-Chang Wu
Yang, A. Y. (2001). Discussion of the problems and suggestions in teaching business
English. The Proceedings of 2001 International Conference on the Application
of English Teaching, 176-181. Ming Chuan University. Taipei: Crane Publishing
Co.
Appendix A
Interview Guide
1.
? (Could you tell me how
you enter the field of Business English? How do you come to teach Business
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
36/37
English?)
2., ,
? (As an English language teacher, you might lack
professional business knowledge when you teach Business English courses. How
do you overcome these problems?)
3., ,
? (As a teacher in the international business
department, you may face some problems related to language instruction. How
do you overcome these problems?)
4.,?(According to your
understanding, why do you think your students attend Business English courses?)
5.,
?(What kind of knowledge or skills do you think the instructors should offer
to students in Business English courses?)
6.,? (What knowledge
and competence should students have in order to meet the needs of job markets?)
7.,,
,? (Business
English courses are not only offered in the Department of Applied English
TIESPJ, Vol. 5:1, 2013 43
but also in the Business College. How do you adjust your instructional style
8/12/2019 ESP Teachers
37/37
according to studentsdifferent backgrounds?)
8.,,
,,
,. (Business English course includes lots of
knowledge, for example, language skills and business knowledge, but they only
have two hours a week. Should the course be divided into several courses so that
teachers could offer more information for students?)
9.
? (How do you prepare the materials for the course? According to your
understanding and observation, do the Business English materials or textbooks
on the market meet the needs of university students?)
10.?
? (Is relevant working experience important
for a Business English teacher? How do Business English teachers improve their
own ability?)
11.?
(Finally, do you have any further suggestions for improvements to Business
English in Taiwan?