Transcript
Page 1: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

Engaging Students in an Age of Disengagement

Ken Ronkowitz

Page 2: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

Dis/Engagement Research

Social Media Engagement

Design Tools

Student Expectations

MOOC

Page 3: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

en·gage /enˈgāj/ verb

To occupy, attract, or involve (someone's interest or attention); Cause someone to become involved (in a conversation or discussion)

Page 4: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

Gallup: As students age, they disengage

Explanations for the burn out:- focus on standardized testing- standardized curricula - lack of experiential and project-based learning- lack of pathways for students who do not want to go on to college

Page 5: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

Gallup’s research suggests that America’s current public system of education & workforce preparation falls short of college and career readiness targets. Only 3% of Americans “strongly agree” that today’s high school dropout is ready for the working world.With a high school diploma, that number only increases to 4%. And in colleges…

Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup Poll : Public Attitudes Toward the Public Schools

Page 6: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement and the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement 2012

Page 7: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

• First-year college students spent an average of 15 hours per week preparing for class; seniors averaged 15.5 hours. – Those earning grades of A or A- studied about 4 hours more

per week compared to their first-year peers with grades of C+ or lower.

• In most fields, full-time seniors devoted about one to two hours less to class preparation than faculty expected.

• When asked how much they believe students actually study, faculty estimates in all fields fell short of student accounts by five to eight hours per week.

Page 8: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

• On average, distance education students spent about one hour more per week preparing for class than their on-campus counterparts.

• Attitudes toward seeing benefits from college were comparable regardless of how engaged students had been in high school.

• Job opportunities were cited by the majority of seniors among the factors motivating their choice of major, but this varied by racial/ethnic background and field of study. – Seniors majoring in science, technology, engineering,

and math were more likely than others to cite job opportunities as a motivating factor.

Page 9: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

And at work…

Page 10: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

Gallup Daily tracking series conducted since 2010 to explore American workers' engagement levels shows majority of American workers not engaged in their jobs

• Highly educated and middle-aged employees among the least likely to be engaged

• 71% of American workers are "not engaged" or "actively disengaged" in their work

Faculty are employees too, so…

Page 11: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

And yet…

Page 12: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

?

Page 13: Engagement in a Disengaged Age
Page 14: Engagement in a Disengaged Age
Page 15: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

The Social Media Funnel

Action

TrustEngage

Page 16: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

Social Media Engagement Inequality

Source: Jakob Nielsen http://www.useit.com/alertbox/participation_inequality.html

MOOC?

Page 17: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

MASSIVE

Page 18: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

http://www.flickr.com/photos/neosnaps/2596044654/sizes/o/in/photostream/

OPEN

Page 19: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

ONLINE

Page 20: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

COURSE

Page 21: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

www.canvas.net

Page 22: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

MOOC Engagement Inequality

90% read content but complete < 2 assignments/tests

10-15% complete coursework & are engaged in discussions

Do we need to redefine “lurkers” and engagement in the MOOC environment?

Page 23: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

Disruption: MOOC Massive Open Online Courses have been getting substantial recent

attention. But future histories of education will likely only note them as a harbinger of change or transitional step into an educational model that is organized around learning.

In most cases, MOOCs operate on a grand scale but use a traditional format in which a faculty member (or two) is responsible for most aspects of course design, delivery, and assessment. (known as xMOOC)

The real threat to traditional higher education embraces a more radical vision that removes faculty from the organizational center and uses cognitive science to organize the learning around the learner. And such models exist now.

www.insidehighered.com/views/2013/04/15/essay-how-technology-and-new-ways-teaching-could-upend-colleges-traditional-models

Page 24: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

design tools

for ENGAGEMENT

Page 25: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

What knowledge and

content is shareable

and/or open to input?

1

Determine appropriate

online spaces and channels

Assess unique attributes and culture of each social media

space

2

Develop participation opportunities

3

Designing Online Engagement – Social Media

Create an engagement

calendarAdaptable to education?

Page 26: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

6 learning designs that encourage engagement

Page 27: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

Begin with objectives, goals, desired results (more under TOOLS)

Beginning with the end - backwards design

1

Page 28: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

backwards design can be helpful for technology adoption

Page 29: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

project-based learningproblem-based learning

team-based learning

2

Page 30: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

real-world assignments

challenges

http://flickr.com/photos/ilker/2493908947/

3

Page 31: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

A focus on problem solving

http://flickr.com/photos/nataliejohnson/237529176/

4

Page 32: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

inquiry

5

Page 33: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

a studio environment

6

Page 34: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

National Programs

Page 35: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

NGTM.net Since 1969, faculty seminars for a rational analysis of instructional problems and to develop realistic, creative approaches and solutions that address those specific problems.For example:

moving F2F classes hybrid online MOOC

Page 36: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

• Completion by Design works with community colleges in 5 states to increase completion and graduation rates for low-income students under 26 years old.

• The Next Generation Learning Challenges provides investment capital to technologists, institutions, educators, and entrepreneurs to bring promising technology solutions to pre-college students for college and career readiness through college and secondary school partnerships.

Page 37: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

www.20mm.org

To grow access and success by eliminating unnecessary hurdles to affordability in higher education and positively disrupt a system that hasn't seen significant evolution for decades, a system that has yet to fully leverage the efficiency, interactivity, or scalability of the digital age.Example: Open textbooks

Page 38: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

tools tech & teacher

Page 39: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

At its best, curriculum drives technology use

Not curriculum driven by technology

Page 40: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

Embedded technology

Page 41: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

Wikis for collaborationBlogs for real audiencesClickers for interactionGoogle (Apps, Plus, Hangouts) and Social Networks for all of the above

Page 42: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

Teachers embracing digital toolsIn (and out) of the classroom

http:

//fli

ckr.c

om/p

hoto

s/sl

ipst

ream

jc/7

4871

6731

/

Page 43: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

Less C More NIn curriculum design by teachers…

Page 44: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

Teachers providing a global audience

And connected (networked) learning

Page 45: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

teachers as facilitators of learning

Page 46: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

providing authentic (real world) assessments

Page 47: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

and, when possible, a customized learning experience (not out of the publisher’s box)

http:

//w

ww

.flic

kr.c

om/p

hoto

s/je

k-a-

go-g

o/44

0119

001/

Page 48: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

mobile As tool of engagement rather than method of disengagement

Page 49: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

F2F , Online, HybridHow do the tools vary?

Page 50: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

Student [employer?]

Expectations

based on a technology rich lifestyle

http://flickr.com/photos/paulm/1584418819/

Page 51: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

always on

http://flickr.com/photos/stuckincustoms/497814516/

And these expectations tend to overlap others

Page 52: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

alwaysconnected

http://flickr.com/photos/crash-candy/2347430057/

Page 53: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

global collaboration and

http://flickr.com/photos/pingnews/491430005/in/photostream/

Page 54: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

an authentic audience (beyond faculty & classmates)

http:

//fli

ckr.c

om/p

hoto

s/th

omas

haw

k/17

4586

756/

Page 55: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

interaction is expectedfaculty:student student:student student:world

http://www.flickr.com/photos/cwalker71/2637125074

Page 56: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

Social learning elements

http://flickr.com/photos/nattu/895220635/

Page 57: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

customizable learning experiences

http:

//fli

ckr.c

om/p

hoto

s/bl

ackb

utter

fly/3

0823

3582

0/

Individualized instruction versus learning options

Page 58: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

Continual feedback

versus instant feedback

http:

//w

ww

.flic

kr.c

om/p

hoto

s/sh

utter

/105

4977

13/

Page 59: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

http://flickr.com/photos/oberazzi/318946369/

And so…• Can educators hijack social media

engagement design and tools for academic engagement?

• Can we meet studentexpectations within academic objectives?

• Can we (re)design curriculum using pedagogy that encourages engagement?

• How does engagement differ F2F, online, in hybridand MOOC settings.

Page 60: Engagement in a Disengaged Age

Ken Ronkowitz

ronkowitz.com@ronkowitz on Twitter


Recommended