FT~- /

~~. - ~ ~ ~ 4~~:~~4 ..e wrill .1migW th4tlr rtene le df 0u L1beU4c, s itt mum: taU,.wewig PeihUI B h uium$

AS bVOE~iYI6I

ERMS;Do aityCents, per annum,

_d iee Dollars if not paid:nof Si Morths from then j $ ou r-Dollars if not

;piltbt twelive Months. Subscribers out

SS ente to pay uvstaeance.No sibstcins- receivedfo less than -one

ne tteal until all ar

rtearage~b1L eet agthe option of the

-I -A be continued.unleri,otherwise o adesfore the ezpiration ofthe

Any persfliprocnring five Subseribers and*4ecoming responsiblefox the same, shll re-ceive the sixth copygratss

Advertiseindl ;ionspCuotslY inserted at

-621 cents per eguar'e 12 lines,orless ) for the

irst inserti, and 43 cents foreach co nton-

nce..ThIos ,plikhed Monthly p-quartcily" ill beerg -tI$ pr sq qare-or'each inserion. ""AdverbstlefnltBot igthe numberfnsertioi5 markeo thnW be contin.

'uedl until ordered out, and charged accord

All Job work done for porsons living at a

distance, must be p irdfor at the time the workjs done, or the payiensecured injhe village-

All commticationsaddressed to the Editor'post paid, wtllbeprOmptlY and strict? attend

eo.

O0 I0]%L'Itr.-Y. From i ,estr -.RepubicanTO TH-E1EV. LUTHER LEE.

Rev. Sr':. adiliessed-you 'a card'-onthe 22d ofilast attary-informing you'thatA wouldpay'ny tespects to you ir due=time, -That.mOabas now ar-ived, and

that promiselat now about to fulfil..But in redeeuing-ry pledge I may not be

ahogether aserespectful as fluttery would-dictate,-or as you or your admirers-might.possibly require. The respect soweverwhich I intended to pay you is the hom-age of Ta-Tn and if; ini drawing you;picture you dislike; the portrait, vou-mutblame the origirnl'.-Cot ie painter.When you seceded fronri the Methodist

Episcopal btreyou.had a right to.pub--lib, if you thought proper to do so-your-easous for your "withdrawal," but in theexercise of your-ecclesiastic4 rights youhad no rigbtto nail the ci ntitutionsof the S-outbrtf Stotes.-or to trespass on

the-rights o others. Your attack then- apon S'outberb 1-stitutions vas :perfect.ly"

gratuitbus~aod youreharges against So'dl-ertina'ten et' T'not-only unjustifiable bpiStb e ere~fa1. -Bad you confiued.yur-selin assigning ,your reasons fotwith-drawing from the thurch, 'towhat were

your legitimate rights, pierhap-n'. South-ern mat trotild have ihogght of noticingthe production of your pen. But asyour

p article-'ontained felse,and seabdalous char-ges against slave .bolders, representingthem to be guilty of crimes "worse thanhorse stealing, gambling or.whoredom,"a moment's reflection "might have taughtyou these charges were too gross to be lis-tened to in -ilence; and too deeply afTectedthe characters of the living and the dead tobe passed over without rebuke. Pursu-ing the mildest course which presented it-.self to my mind, I, as 'one .hr those whomyou had thusgressly assailed, proposed tooffer you my visivs on the sulject of do-mestic slavery, if you would admit mycommunications into your papei; in which

1, in common with others, had been so vi-

olently assailed. In this way I hoped tobe ahle to correct the errors into whichyou had falleo, and consequetitly foil aw ayfrom slave holders the charges and i-e-preaches wjhich you had heaped uponthem).-

To-one who admitted the possibility ofhis being mistaken concerning a sub'jectwich he never had -an opportunity or in-

vestigating-to-a heart, generous. just~andkind, who would not wantonly sport withthe feelings of his fellow man, or untieces-sarily assail the reputation of n neighbor--to~ a christiau who would not on slightevioec,rndch lesson no evidence at all,propagate an'opinin against his fellowchristian,-derogatory to the christian char-

-.acter-but above all to the minister of the'gospel of Jesus Christ who would dreadto violate any of its sacred precepts, such

' an overture -would have been acceptableand 'by such would have beeu receivedjjith promptitude~and pleasure. But how

wrasmy proposition met, atnd in what man-

ner was my application treated ? A briefreview of your conduct in the premisesshall constitute a reply.

After publishing slave holders, of whom'1 am- oe, as being guilty of thu basestrimes,-ycanrefused to admit my defence

jnto youtpa'per, uinless I would engag~e.£o have your arguments as extenisiv-ely cii-eulated amocng :slakie .holders, through the

..medium of some southern paper, as mty ar-

guments would bie cli-culated .among abo-litionists through the mediuin of the TrueWegisyap. And was this propositioh just?.if you think it was, yotir goddess wears nobandageover her eyes, nor- does she lioldin her hand an eken balance. '-We inclinethe balance as ef'ectually by lessening theweight in otne scale as by increasing it inthe other." You first preferred scanuda-Ions charges against me, and then .denied

-- e the right of defendinig mnyself, (a rightheld saered by Heathen, Jewish & Chris-

atian Law,) unless I would engage to com-

Tcould not compty. For-lst. I1was notan'ediior of any paper, nor. had-any in-terest in; or control-of. ny.papei wiatever.2nd.'You inus't ..have- known, rgyour ig-noraincois greater than supposed; thatthe writings of-.ahdlitionists would not beadmit'ted -into" Soihetn papers --Yourcondiiin wasferefote nothing bui a pit-ifdI evaionat -so it was considered bysensible abolitionists.When you were reproacbed by a brother

editor wi':this evasion, you agreed .in a'paroxyisjtnofr wounendd pride to publishmy artielr; f he would publish the 'wholeof the controversy irbis paper. "It was anevil hour .fnouMr.Lee, that you madet is offer.:: Here your cnningfailed 3ou:}elu madg'it on the- assumption that thegentlemanto'vhomthe offer-waemade,'was altqirerhe such a one as yourself"-tha6; ihicb ou had never fallen: into:agreater mistake .before To: avoid a con=tioversy for which-you were conscious youwere riot competent-to,,pt-ese e uuim-paired the reputation.of lbelug"an able dis-ptant" to- which'you koew, if you knewany thing. ~ou could la o just or well-:fopn'ied .claimnand-to p ent your being'hila p to 1,ublicscorn.for your unmanlyconducti you -ventured' to make an .offerwhich you-believed- would not be-accepted,biciuse.you knewv athat the gentleman ton hoin the offer was mitde was an aholi-ionist, and knowing himto be an, aholi-

tionist, you thought he would not alnit idifcussion.of-domestic slavery into his pa:per; '.This was your capital error. Thiswas the false step wbich you took in thismatier. This false stop ooce taken obli--ged you to make some-show of fight..whichnotiviihstandidg all your vapourings and;preetdeda courage. soon :cooled off- and.left toi a ica~rger mark behind. Thankstoihe l-v. Mr. . pringor, for his magna-nimiry a 4 impartiality: bad it not beenfor thi emana-'-liberality," the worldhad nev een enliglitened with your lu-cubrations, and you might have descendedto your-grave sustaining the character ofthe accomplished scholar-the, expert dis-prutant-the- profound philosopher--audthe able divine.But the best of men, Mr. tee, are liable

to falt into error, for infallibility is not anattrilintebof man : and for simple error an

ingenudus'mine can readily find an ex

cuse. -'it what excuse can he offered formoral obliquity in any one -especially in a

inister' of the gospel ? There is some-'hiti in. it so sneaking and cowardly-hero is something in it so little and miwan-.there is something in it bo unjust andunfair-there is something in it so dishon-rablo and shameful, that the most ingen-ions at forming excuses tor the failures or

infirmities of mankind are utterly at a losstoo frame an excuse for this. Unfortuuntelyfor you sir, you seri to have yielded your-self up entirely to its influence, and to be

,Bcompletely under its power, that how-"ver it may have been A ith you in youryunger days, you cannot now speak the

truth-and nothing bit the truth-no, noteven by accident. Take a few particu-ars as-proof.You labored at the outset-of the contro-

versy to prove that I was the audaciousand pugnacious "challenger" of the manwhose motto is, "Jirst pure, t/un peacea-le," when I only proposed to defend mycharacter against the false and scandalouscharges which you had previously puhl-fished against slave holders. You repea-tedly represented me as avoiding the pointwhich we had set out to discuss, nndyourself as panting for an opportunity tocome to close quarters. You charged me

with writing in "a had temper," iaeaingyou 'contemptuously." and being guiltyof "abuse," nutwithstauding I had expli-ily proposed in my first letter that noerm should be used ini the~ controversynheomiing the gentleman-the christianitl the miinister-ai propo'sitio:n which y onscued with sen'rn. Y7ou charge me u iiteirg ptivy to the negress iaking anay the"Aishavsery Manual" froim the roomwhere its odn~er Dr. Bonnet lged whileattendina the Generaf Coniference in Bal-imoreitati might turn the aflair to hisdisadvantage-whent the fact is-the Doce-torgave the book to the negress, and I wasin South Carolina at the timie. :You haveeulogised your imbeicile performances in a

straitn ofegotismn disgustinig to the ititeli-gent reader, 'vheni y-ou ouighit to have left~the public to judge for iheitselves res-

pecting the nierit of your -articles and testregth of your argtuments. You haveliedged that the rpadcrs of the True Wes-

levan are niow satisfied resp'ecting the mat-ter at issue bietween us, atid that this stateofthinigs has been brought about by yourelaborate productions. You have exclu-ded my letters from your paper, notwith-standing you hacd promised to publishthem, thereby being guilty of a fulsehoodtas well as an act ot; injustice. When youfound you .could not substanitiate yourcharges against slaveholders,you held backyour communications for three months, un-til von would see what I would say, altho'yoi could have written a commutnicationin "one day" as yon tell us, you writewh so much facility. When. yoti were

reproached for your conduct by the editorof the Olive Braudch, you 'proposed newcondiions to mo to carry on the contro-versy. anid you insultingly told hint that-'hypublishiing the discussion ini his paper hemight increase his subseription- list, altthough yonr own at -the tine, ivas not'near as large as his. And not: to muhily proofs, you have ungenerously-and'falsely charged the -Rev. Mr. Sprnnger;Shagree~d 4to publish the controversy,~when ydpgi 'ivrofd not publish it in yourown paper, with 'combining with me to

c..,ud ;., ft-.m the Recorder that

herebyI might get-rid of- the controversytieu you furnish proof in the same. lettein;*hich you make the- charge, that youstatement is false-absolutely 'false-falsin all its parts.You complain that I have represntd

you:as having: retired' from the controversial field, and express yourself at a losto knowon what grounds I. could haveformed this opinion. Asid-pray sir, hadnot good reason for thinking' you had retired, when three. months had elapsed be-tweenyour letir of July 26th, and miniof October 26th,-when I wrote to the editor of he' Recorder to know what hadbecome of Sou, or what 'was the cause o

your silence? In what light could I'con-sider your silence but as exhibiting proothat you had "backed out-?' - Ipso factoyour silence was proof of your retreatWhd you commenced -the discussion didyou intend that three months should intervene betwien the dates of your letters ?Ifyou did, you ought to have told me so.But you did not, for you promised that acertain portion of the "True .Wesleyan"should be appropriated to the controversy"every tweek" Did not- you or your coeditors assure-the pnlilic that the paperwould print as fast as the'disputants could:write.? When an apology was offered foryour delay in replying to my first two letters, were we nor .iold' that now yotY'hadremoved to the West the controversywould.go on without any delaff; In con-

sequence of your delay did,. I not publisha-letter in the Recorder that 1 would pub..lish no' more until you hat) replied"to mytwo letters-that I should adhero to themotto-"Audi alterem parlem." . And inthat letter didi [ 'iot tell the editor of theRecorder, that my neighbors were undershe impression that the controversy wouldnot go on, otherwise I could have senthim more subscribers than I did ? Was itnot with the expectation of obtaining thecontroversy in due tinme, that so manywere indje'ed to subscribo for tie paper,and do yoit-think it was either honorableor honest thus to violate an implied con-tract-tn falsify your promised punctuality-and cheat them out of what; ihey were

willing to'reedive as an equivalent for theirmoney ? If you think it. was, I do not.And to prove that I would not be:a partyto such an infamous transaction, I wrote asecond letter about your delay, and pub-published it in the Recorder; ,.Of these let-ters you ha'vo taken ao notice in your com-plaint but proceed to censure ine as if youwere as free from spot as the virgin snow.I subsequently continued my letters in do-fence of slavery, not inscribed to you as

formerly, for I considered that you had"backed out," and I did not think I was

under any obligation to wait for you "toblow your own bugle" to announce yourdefeat. ...

lInt strongly as I condemn your mannerin conducting this controversy, your faultstherein are venial when compared withthe principles you profess .ahd the objectyou have in yicw. Do you ask what arethese principles? and what is this object?I answer, I arrive at a knowledge of theformer by a perusal of your own articles,and the articles of others published. chieflyin your paper: and the object is tooplainlyand too frequently indicated to b6 .mifun-derstuod by the most stupid or superfeialreader. rTo begin with your principles:

1. Your first principle is a professed pityfor the negro slave. Against pity for thenegro, I have-I can have, uobjectton,1provided that under the mask of pity forthe slave, injury is not intended or done tothe master. I honor the 'man who :feelscompassion for his fellow. man, whetherhe be black, white, or red : but in this caseI suspect tnhe profession of pity- is nothingbut a mask; because it injures the slaveinstead of beneftling him.-and, becauseit is a patlpabhe violatio'n of the golden rule

hvwi haoitionists profcss to be gav-erned-"dho. unto others as you would theyshould do unto yuu."

2. From avowing pity for thme slave,you proceed to fix the character of the ini-stittmion of .domestic slavery. You say,"slavery .is a great taoral evil-a sinagai nstooud-the sum of all villanies-thevilest system of oppression that ever sawthe sun:-worse than horse stealing, 'gain-bhitng, or whoredomn" This character yepugive it, not only without any. authorityfrom the scriptures, but in flat oppositionto them. -. .

.3. You next fix the character of slaveholders. They are "Thieves, Robbers,Pirates"-unwvorthy-to be called "Charis-tians" anid "worse than the ds::."-

.4. A' scriptural defence of... domesticslavery is termed "HORRID BLAIi'uEitT.""This is comuwitted whenever, any onesavs the Blible, or. in oth'er words,. the. .odof'the Bibf: sanctions slavery (excelit forcrime) or that he did sanction it in oldtimes which if it were not .done in ignor-ance, 'would he an unpardonable sin.-What ! a just God sanction the most un-bounded itnjustice !! the sum o'f all 'villhan-ies, the tinsophisticated wickedness,, thesu perdiabolical and unparalleled robberyof God and man."

"I believe that 1 am bound as a man, acitizen and a ehtistian to do all.I-can inthe use of all means not contrary to theword 'i God,, to efl'ect its iinmediate' and

6. 'You are opposed to Colinization andwouldl not send emancipated negroes out olthe United 'Sta'tes. But y'on, wouldiurnthree millionseo nuegroes. with, all theitvices and habits of idlenesaloose upon 'thewhite community ofthe South.'

7. 'You say, "as s1qve holdinig is wrong,'and as every slave has 'a right to. himaceiand his liberty~slave holders are of right en-titlerd to no enmn.enation for theirslaves.'

,8. "If the slave holder is entitledr compensation it must consist in prisons-

stocks-thunb screws--gags-mrir-il;knives:- branding irons-bloody whips-iron yokea-gall chains-and all other totures ofbody and mind, for time and etenity.'.

r 9. "Let the North say with an emphisis that cannot be misunderstood,. thislavery must be.aholished, or the Uniot ldissolved. It is against this usurper (sltvery) we would lend her panoplied in thprinciples of 16 combating unto death, fethe right and the true spirit of libeity4'

10. "Slave iolJers are Thieves-Rdbbers-Pirates, and ire deserving of a Pirate's death."Thus, sir, have I arrived at the devel

opment of your plans. beginning with youdeep hypocrisy or. atlected pity for, thslave, -and proceeding step by step to thinfliction of every possible variet'of "tortures of.body and mind" on the siuve ho[der. And not satisfied with what youmalignity could inflict on hint within thecircumscribed limits of life's duration, ywould follow him if yoti could, into theregions of the .damned to inflict on hiuaggravated 'tortures' in hell.. To reconcileyour partizaus -to such horrid scenes, .ocruelty and butchery and to induce thento co-operate with you, to carry out youpurposcs, you have dicessed up the slaveholder-in a fancy robe upoti .s hich youhave painted "Stocks-thumb. screws-gags-bloody , .whis--yokes--chains-marking knives lbranding irons," &c.and over all .havognscribed in capital let-ters, "Woasx' TuAs, ixDVIL." Youhave entleavored tn press the mild andgentle. religion of the Saviour of meninto your service, by preaching up "SA Nc-TnFCATiOS"rTro such a horrid purpose.You-have scatterel "fire brands, arrowsand death" into churches, representingthnsechurches as too impure for the purityof your party. You have avowed an op-positiou to the Constitution and Lawsofthe United States and'rejected the decis-ions of her highest Judicial tribunal withdisdain. You lave expressed a determi-natinn to disregard -the .rights of others, ifthose rights cone. in, conflict with yourviews. You aim at the dismembermenofthe Union, and have hoisted the bloodyflag as the sigul of attack. And to giveyour views dnd principles the.greater cur-

rency.with the ignora:t a'id unsuspecting.you call ydirself and .your-party "THETanE Wt I.kANs" 0 what a misno-mer-what a'crime !! But you will say,perhaps, that I mis.represent you. If I dhso, you, have the means and the ability tocorrect tny..mistakes. Disavow the prem-ises-disavow the conclusions if you can.There is no need for me stirely to court theimagination to lend her aid, when youhave expressed' your object as plainly as

language can express it. Great God ! andis this the man who affects to be movedwith. pity to one class of his fellow men,whilst he is meditating the utter destruc-tion of another? ,-Is this the man who as-sumes the character of the minister of thePrince of Peace whilst he carries theincendiary's. torch in one hand and the as-sassin's knife in tie other, Rather mightI nut say, you seam to have studied thecharacter of-the leaner of the insurrectionin St. Domingo, awl to. be determined tomake every trait in his character yourown. Nat 'urner, the wholesale murder-er of Virginia professed to have receivedinstructions from. God, and to have hadthose instructions confirmed by a miracle,to massacre the inhabitants of Southa-np-tan, but Nat Turner never said "slave hotders are worse than. the Devil;".-he knewtheni too.: well and had too much goodsense to make such a- declarat ion. You. sir,have the honor of making this discovery,and this-declaration ---Acting, however,undelfr the same blind and fanatic zeal ilinmNat Turner amed under.you :tive us r-son to ctonclude ilhat you think if you werein imitate his conduct you wouldl be doiingGod and his cautse service. Noi need, then,of aty flights of fanicy to represent houseslaitd itt ashes by the torch of the incendia-ry-to describe the flight of the young andbeautiful female from-the pursuit of her de-stroyer-to tpIl of-the indiscriminate mas-sacre of all classes and of all ages, fromrthe hoary matron to the sucking infant-all these things and a thousand more wvhiceicannot be told have been-transacted in.St.Domingo, and in Southamjiton within theperiod ofmyown recnllection, and all thesethings are to he acted overg.again if youand your party an only su'cceed in yonplans. - .

Whens Bgjlaidad kinig of Syr-ia watsick,: he. sent.taZael an officer in his armsto Elisha thie proph'et..10,- enquire .tf heshould recover. WVhen l-iazael came, theprophet looked steadfastly .in his face-blushed-and wept. Hazael said."whyweepeth tmy lord ?" The prophet answered "boecause:l-knowy "the evil thou wilt dcunto the children of Israel,- their :strongholds .wilt thou set on fire-andi the ilyoung men wilt thou slby with the swort-and wilt .dash thiir chidyen-and ripurtheir women with- child." -And Hazassaid, "But what ! is thy servant adog tha,he should dqg this great thing 1" To whisijthe prophet mildlg jeplied-"tho-:LAorchth sheweJUme-that thou wilt be kinj

over Syria." As if hs-lad said -1 see yetare a -proud:mnan and love, to. rule-ayoupride will make you an unjust-man-you~)Thjstice wiilnk6 youi cruel-and. yon

cruelty, for [your own- safe~ty, will.miakiyou a trionster. Accordingly after'horeturned to his-master -his, frst word 'wasLie-and his first act-was the hastening a.the death of his Sovereign by-sufocationAnid on he went from crime to crime, tilinotwithstandine the horror ho had ijtst be

o fore;manifested: at the bare recital.of-the.crimes which blisha told him be-uould-commit, he perpetrated everycrimewhichhad been foretold, by, the,:prophet withoutany compunction and without any re-morse.

I offer no pologjMr Lee, for thefrankness or severity of my remarks : for

t it is no timetq bge eriinging or- apolugisinge. when my house is in -a blaze; over my

head, and the murderer's dagger ispointed'e at my heart. Aly only concern is, lestr thousands who are abolitionists should ap-

ply to themselves the.. remarks which Ithave intended in this letter, exclusivelyforyou and yourparty. I distinguish betweenanti-slavery men, and abolitionists likeyourself; for although-tho' former believeslavery to be an evil, they: ivild- not heaccessary to an injury to .slaviholders, Hmuch less would they encourage by theifwritings the massacre df the master for itiesake of the slave.. This it appears'tondris not the case with you and others'ofyourstamp. for the whole tenor ofyour writingsis to bring about such a result. -If, how.ever, the day should ever unfortunatelyarrive when the'aid of anti:sldefy'.enivilf be iyanted to quiet. a Southein insu-rection, I have no doubt from; ',vhat has-saken .place. Ino:Philidelphia, Cincinnati,Alton, Boston, Utica and othet.pleesihatthe North, the Eat: "aid the West, wouJlpour in their tens of thousapdsrto the aidof the South, under the deep conviction ofthe truth. of the sentiment expressed hyeneminent Jurist-''that man's first duty isto.-his God-his next to his country."

Will the "Albany Patriot," and the"Olive Branch" pleaseo insert this letter.

A McCAINE..Lott'a, Edgefield Dist, S. C., May 13, 184'l

: 1NiSOEfLNAEOUS.GEN. CASS-'S :SPEECH IN FAVOR

- OF THE NOMINATION. -dTb Democratic Associatiod ofDetroit, I

met.on the 3d inst., to'respopId to the na -rLio'naf nominations. It was a galling polieat Whiggery. Gen. Lewis Cass, the sol-dier and statesman, twho had a strong-sup-port oi the second day of the -BaltimorevConvention, appeared in the dildst&f his :

feliow citizens, and addressed them. He bh'eartily responded -to the nominadoti of dPolk and Dallas. ="W. hero'estictasett llence from his'sjeeh 1-

"Gen. Cuss said he had come. here this J

evening to take part in the proceedings, to a

express his hearty concnrrence in the nom- n

ination mado'by the Baltimore Democra- ttic Convention, and to announce his deter-: e

minatiot. faithfully to support it. He said .nthe crisis throu,b which the Democratic .fparty had just passed; had served but the ubetter to prove the integrity of its princi-.pies. and the internalstrengthi of its cause.After many difietences of opinion, differ-.ences however, about men,-and not about cmeasures, the choice-of the Convention had c

unanimously fallen tipor-a man irreproach-. fable in private life, and -who-in various'public stations, had given proof of greatfirmness and ability, -of incorruptible in-tegrity. and of a sincere devotion to those Iprinciples, which the Democratic party.deem essential to the prosperity ol' our

country, and the perpetuation of her' free dinstitutions. I know him well- said Gen- r

eral Gass, and I know he will fulfil the -expectations of his friends, and fully-jisti- Jfy the confidence of the party. -Nothibs fis now 'wanting to ensure success, butunited exertion, and that we must .itndwill have.. -Let us put behind-us the divi- .asions and' 1.refereuces of the past, and joinin one common et'or, to promote the triumph-of -our- cause. Victory is in our .ipower, and let us attain it. Let every one .ifeel and fulfil his duty. I am so persuad- !ed that such 1i.llp the getneral sentiment, V

and action of the-jiarty, that 1- confidently- AIpredict that James K, Polk -will be-the Inext President of the .United -States, -andif he. is,. I know be wvill follow in ib inKsteps of Washington,4fJefferson; of Mtad-isou, and of Jackson?" :.;

-Alier the adijo'urnmeht gif tis enndthe comnpany gathered in front ofithe d~eling of General Cass, a~ndgave:^three hearty cheers. The GJenernlei ento tedaand thanked. them kindly, ditc~tqto do- their duty to dlie denoaysdetheir contry-byelectiag:Jaznes.K2Poktbeir next President.-TVie vorlpiiywi(hone voice repliad that .they would, anda "Jthey will. --

2--ilas)Friga hi-saeYr d

salar near:Ogdenslinru Nh f tsOwhich he went some-ten;-years-ago iiatlog hishprpfessioth: wbich-btou ta-im ithousand. per jannumnoa tut OO ayear,. whichhis earned by the swe't ofhsbros 'Wh'en Mirma laI BurenTdryup~to'his' house some yibs-ario, on par 'I

cular .poliical business1 ,-e- ld Mr -aWright its a'hey woolsey 4plis'stones tnto heaps t2 save h sce f i edmowers,, when :the grass wa sedy for-harves, one of the stff labotious - '

cdn% hever-manwent-ati e-haveitnd.it $speak knowingly.e-6hdba

beid~u~-hefjiageship, secretarshi,~tjiii sui~ for fresident at the lafe

~6~d~i~itBahidtore, and abelnomnevIce, presidency declined it

3e!Oegptty. Such- ir-te character, ad-sorme ofthe prominenI adts of SilaseWriglitsenator from+Naw--York ; and peopa willbe ai-a loss ti-now wjAt haa esissed himto t'akfe;dp farisiig'nNLontient".hitsel

w-~ith being senator only.--Cncsais -Corn

The Whigs are singularly inorttatalo2their attempts to lessen the clatith of Col.Polk to thefa&a~nb onidencern of thQ

American: people.r'

,"Yground I.bat 111§tlnpopnl8 1t31,1n ;I

twice defeated'bun"forthe'o ce" ,eelnor. -.1f.i1,, very. krue;tliatJie-feAted", but;-do not"ahe:peo '.

States .know="tbeauses't ' A tts"'4de ; %

feaR ?.- .Weshat .oaisel. io r ' :4e eefier ' for.:wer ba emuproofs itsexpose"thertm rd ===; r

the; Aefeat°: fGove o .ae'. '"incompetency, tl to- inn s'occupied bybot7rvatidia[eeden as'regards lgatfo'ro ae "feat :is- an' objection? to Col. Polk;'si s did, '. ""not, the =earns' objection be iHege d'.'tb'VFr. y =, "

Clayy° in s; mere' forcibf e iriatinel"'!C'o {r;T'Polk" .was =twice'defented'fo Yh o1£

f3overnor. :l ow many tiules aivaa;Mr V,;cJ \fMay " 'defented' Tor tlie' office .of Preetde l:Was not Mr. Clay defeated in 1824, 'cvb ets - _'be received but37 out of2G.Celeetorglvoles ' ' " ;'tom,Was h6^: not vlriuall i <defeated-;i 8: 4 y::'when Mr John Q, Adams recetved"'83 Ktd }gen. Jackson 178 electoral''votess!t =' Pt " :.le not : fe t d "individually, , ,th.

i!seived#ltiY 49'out 286iil eotoi'al.,,.:: y- . : ,. " . ,G.:_votes T And in 1840; was he riot leUeat ,.-t 'n' the Whig cpnveittioo, as Belo ss

iiai1ah1e than Gen: Haritsot t -":Tbustw . "

& Glay"defea+edia.his aspirations tut l ti.=::iighest,'o15cc4f the coILntr ; noct o'timi-

,t fatic'ttimesfaod' yet bey Wbigs'alled ;

ts'an objection to theBloc ioQ'ufCbI bPolC>> __oribe of^ rt s,hat he has:beetitwice "defeateil f - = " -: r Ice of Governor-4 '" ".:", =,-: ." ,._

ontiaue ibesubjectiaaiil egiiei5iitimeriiIf this paper. Augusta' Constilu[iota _ :.

Murder and Lynch Leto in-The Natcbez, Courier ot'the'.4th"iuat - ==

on'ains the particulate*of.:anattedcious;="nurder in Jeffersoncounty, -MIsai;:?wi ' ;.te l.::he summary esecuiiett'orwo cf.'thn:iriiiterera.; It. seems "tbat}a'%MV-Wm yd? " - " .

near tarry'89ect. ouiof his negrtles R':som 't eae., ..ors;;,

hen "tbe fellote ftlroedio atti g eirnd was- about-i6 overpo eliter called upon ::tiiro aegivcre at work'm the same'-fieL s > r.

ance; butinsteat t f-6elPttigths3i leim":',vith-ibeii"bet abtl. -' ": " "'

est!,: :'rho l beee {ncgt oe_ e' ereted =";' ,

cir af t% "?' :fr "a "

wo days ttmeat begin tt . " ^emoved to a", log;-pihe,. s c ar r' - ' ::.:.~

M fire; end burnt the body to.asti t be .

iegroos,- suspectaig t'hat' t6e =atilisebcer ;:' %hetrRnasterwould-soogb' hno a a to t ;: t

d boldness . enough :- :to fell ifotnt wt ,cigbbors-.tbat;_Me._ .. 4.-nr noire days=abet hie borsef''irsd1

p"saddled.,brdledr- and th e j ;firuspecred'foulplay'A search +vas.inametlEat el iosiitisfehe neighbors, and4fter',someerne upon the suer io th"e,'f tasteombat had taken.place- bf rce g ;F

loyd"and'th"e iegroes Onext m ;jed a : _!farce tr l' .i"11th imlitil .the ne n yret

then they acknowledged;' their i&def'a1tatecLabove: The exc1temesfi atnoogtixe -s

enpie assembled was very grgat $_:trts J '"'' tfe :ted ^y ..a .

oe hunJred -persona were cQ r-tea s.ridaylast,:.31at. ult:., oite;; eelc:f ibd r

l T yo GI f Ly^-.C..

ay of the murder. Theya lgoiateJ'ai ntg ; ,_ s

,t eight een. nten. to decide;u" iai*i4 iii e''°one' with "the-i egroes:' .f-ou rttirtr Lam- V

try -were.:for ":banging ;.thejur-aga&i.it.- ;.Two'of'ifievbdan aod" oue of>ihe=wti iieD

nstaotly." -T11'otber'w.utria .r ' a''""'''''

a t spa F.

n cdot On We u J4 '_ i '

oinination o . Po lk r"- Sri:. ""''"

a;.; th Hodse=rof'Repce9eWill, "" f/ll:r1.'0fMdA air_ ah1-"1!.4 ". ciy W':..:'- ^.: