Transcript
Page 1: Draft Liquor Bill (B23 – 2003) Public Hearing – 13 May 2003 Shoprite Checkers - Submission N

Draft Liquor Bill(B23 – 2003)

Public Hearing – 13 May 2003Shoprite Checkers -

Submission N

Page 2: Draft Liquor Bill (B23 – 2003) Public Hearing – 13 May 2003 Shoprite Checkers - Submission N

Presenter:Whitey Basson

CEO - Shoprite Checkers

Page 3: Draft Liquor Bill (B23 – 2003) Public Hearing – 13 May 2003 Shoprite Checkers - Submission N

Shoprite

• Currently operates 317 grocer’s wine licensed outlets

• Best represents the country’s demographic profile (LSM)

Page 4: Draft Liquor Bill (B23 – 2003) Public Hearing – 13 May 2003 Shoprite Checkers - Submission N

LSM1-3 LSM4 LSM5 LSM6 LSM7 LSM8Shoprite Checkers All Shoppers

Retail Shopper profile by LSM group

Page 5: Draft Liquor Bill (B23 – 2003) Public Hearing – 13 May 2003 Shoprite Checkers - Submission N

Shoprite• Total of 34m customers monthly• 60% of housewives shop at

Shoprite• Supermarkets sell approximately

22% of all unfortified wine

Page 6: Draft Liquor Bill (B23 – 2003) Public Hearing – 13 May 2003 Shoprite Checkers - Submission N

Bill objectives• Reduce socio economic and

other costs of alcohol consumption &• Promote the entry of new

participants in the liquor industry

Page 7: Draft Liquor Bill (B23 – 2003) Public Hearing – 13 May 2003 Shoprite Checkers - Submission N

1. 3 – Tier system• Manufacturer–Micro Manufacturer (not

specifically determined)• Distributor• Retailer

Page 8: Draft Liquor Bill (B23 – 2003) Public Hearing – 13 May 2003 Shoprite Checkers - Submission N

Disadvantage of 3 – Tier system • Abandonment of existing

infrastructure–Procurement (now only from

distributor)–Re-distribution not permitted

• Result = Increased cost

Page 9: Draft Liquor Bill (B23 – 2003) Public Hearing – 13 May 2003 Shoprite Checkers - Submission N

Disadvantage of 3 – Tier system (cont.)• New entry to the second tier

will be very costly while efficient distribution systems currently exist• Inevitably a cost passed on to

the already burdened consumer

Page 10: Draft Liquor Bill (B23 – 2003) Public Hearing – 13 May 2003 Shoprite Checkers - Submission N

Disadvantage of 3 – Tier system (cont.)• Price sensitive product– Increased price = reduced volume

(source: USB price elasticity –1)Price increase 20% volume down 20%

• Influence on employment–345 000 farm workers wine industry

Page 11: Draft Liquor Bill (B23 – 2003) Public Hearing – 13 May 2003 Shoprite Checkers - Submission N

Disadvantage of 3 – Tier system (cont.)• Proposed 3 tier system does not

dilute current monopolies of manufactures–Second tier will continue to dominate

sector as currently experienced by small retailers because of size and brands

Page 12: Draft Liquor Bill (B23 – 2003) Public Hearing – 13 May 2003 Shoprite Checkers - Submission N

Disadvantage of 3 – Tier system (cont.)– High establishment cost of new brands to

manufacturers without direct access to consumer markets – reduced competition (Possible control of delivery)

–We believe the 3 tier system will not meet its objectives as it failed in the USA – see handout of Adv Pretorius (advisory to the competitions board)

Page 13: Draft Liquor Bill (B23 – 2003) Public Hearing – 13 May 2003 Shoprite Checkers - Submission N

2. Conversion of Grocer wine license• Section 5 provides for the conversion

of current wine grocer licenses to full off-consumption licenses

• We welcome this– Require OPTION to retain the grocer wine

licenses as some locations cannot be converted.

– Extend range to include beer (reasons later in presentation)

Page 14: Draft Liquor Bill (B23 – 2003) Public Hearing – 13 May 2003 Shoprite Checkers - Submission N

Conversion of Grocer wine license (cont.)• For the following reasons:–No regulations available–Adhere to the specific needs of

community in which we operate–70% of wine purchases in

Supermarkets are made by women • conversion to a full license will force them

back into the old bottle store environment which they resent

Page 15: Draft Liquor Bill (B23 – 2003) Public Hearing – 13 May 2003 Shoprite Checkers - Submission N

Conversion of Grocer wine license (cont.)–Reduce grocers ability to lower

prices (10 – 15%)–Removal of the grocer wine license

will reduce competition and increase price discrepancy

Page 16: Draft Liquor Bill (B23 – 2003) Public Hearing – 13 May 2003 Shoprite Checkers - Submission N

Conversion of Grocer wine license (cont.)–Supermarkets are•well controlled and disciplined• comply to all the requirements of the

act not to sell liquor to minors and other unqualified people

–Tax collection is structured and controllable

Page 17: Draft Liquor Bill (B23 – 2003) Public Hearing – 13 May 2003 Shoprite Checkers - Submission N

Conversion of Grocer wine license (cont.)–Worldwide, liquor products across the

total range are offered for sale in retail supermarkets

Page 18: Draft Liquor Bill (B23 – 2003) Public Hearing – 13 May 2003 Shoprite Checkers - Submission N

3. Empowerment• The difficulty of achieving

objectives like– broadening the manufacturing and

distribution channels –and economic empowerment

• Is highlighted by the following slides of the current distribution control in the liquor industry

Page 19: Draft Liquor Bill (B23 – 2003) Public Hearing – 13 May 2003 Shoprite Checkers - Submission N

Empowerment (cont.)• Beer – 96% of the beer market is

dominated by a single manufacturer and beer equals 53.9% of the total liquor market • This resulted largely to the failure

of new participants entering the beer market succesfully in the 60’s

Page 20: Draft Liquor Bill (B23 – 2003) Public Hearing – 13 May 2003 Shoprite Checkers - Submission N

2.7 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1

96.6

SAB

Win

dhoe

k

Bav

eria

Bra

u

Bec

ks

Gui

nnes

s

Impo

rted

Kilk

enny

Off consumption – Supplier % Share of Total Beer marketYE Feb/Mar 2003

Page 21: Draft Liquor Bill (B23 – 2003) Public Hearing – 13 May 2003 Shoprite Checkers - Submission N

Total Liq Off-cons – Category % Share of Total Liq market

24.5

11.57.8

2.3

53.9

Bee

r

Spiri

ts

Tot.

Unf

orts

Flav

Alc

Bev

Forts

YE Feb/Mar 2003

Page 22: Draft Liquor Bill (B23 – 2003) Public Hearing – 13 May 2003 Shoprite Checkers - Submission N

Empowerment (cont.)• New entrants require organised

high volume outlets such as supermarkets to enter and launch new brands successfully in the beer market and

• Utilise the efficient distribution network of grocers to deliver their products

Page 23: Draft Liquor Bill (B23 – 2003) Public Hearing – 13 May 2003 Shoprite Checkers - Submission N

Empowerment (cont.)• Wine–Brands are also strongly controlled –

unless diluted by strong retail channels new entrants will fail–Grocers successfully established

new wine brands and this could be enhanced should beer sales be permitted

Page 24: Draft Liquor Bill (B23 – 2003) Public Hearing – 13 May 2003 Shoprite Checkers - Submission N

Total Liq Off-cons – Supplier % Share of Total Liq market

20.8

8.63.4 1.6 1.2 0.7 0.4 0.1

10.0

53.2

SAB

Dis

tell

UD

V

E Sn

ell

Dou

glas

G

Seag

ram

s

Bro

wn

Form

an

Moo

iuits

ig

Jonk

eer

All

othe

r

YE Feb/Mar 2003

Page 25: Draft Liquor Bill (B23 – 2003) Public Hearing – 13 May 2003 Shoprite Checkers - Submission N

Conclusion• Welcome intentions of legislature–To weaken monopolies–Promote new entrants

• We believe the 3 tier system will not meet its objectives (US failure)

• 3-tier System to be properly investigated before implementation

Page 26: Draft Liquor Bill (B23 – 2003) Public Hearing – 13 May 2003 Shoprite Checkers - Submission N

Conclusion (cont.)

• Supermarkets holds the key to–New entrants–Effective Distribution–Delivery to the public –Responsible manner–Lowest prices

Page 27: Draft Liquor Bill (B23 – 2003) Public Hearing – 13 May 2003 Shoprite Checkers - Submission N

Conclusion (cont.)

Supermarkets will develop industry as a whole creating export

opportunities and employment

Thank you