Determination of Reservoir Properties from XRF Elemental Data in the Montney
Formation
Justin Besplug, Ron Spencer and Tom Weedmark - XRF Solutions -www.xrfsolutions.ca
Abstract
Portable X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) instruments allow a large amount of data to be obtained rapidly, with minimalsample preparation or drilling impact, and at low cost. Rock powders, cuttings, slabs or core faces can beanalysed directly using this non-destructive technique. XRF analyses provide highly precise, and if calibratedproperly, accurate data on the bulk chemistry. Proprietary normative mineral algorithms are applied in order toconvert the elemental chemical data to mineralogy. Mineral abundances determined from the XRF analysescorrelate well with those obtained by X-Ray Diffraction, thin section point counting and SEM analyses. The vastmajority of the data fall within the 5% envelope expected from the precision of the XRD analyses whencompared with XRF determined mineralogy. Mineralogy in the Montney is variable and the most abundantminerals are calcite, dolomite, quartz, feldspar and illite. Minor amounts of phosphate, anhydrite, pyrite,kaolinite and TOC are also present.
Mineralogy and trace element data are used to determine reservoir properties through a set of semi-empirical
equations. Porosity and mechanical properties, including Poisson’s ratio and Young’s modulus, determined by
XRF algorithms correlate well with values obtained from wireline logs and lab analyses in vertical wells.
Formation specific algorithms developed from vertical wells can be applied to cuttings analysed from horizontal
production wells, where conventional log analyses are impractical or too expensive. The information obtained is
particularly valuable for geosteering purposes if conducted on site in real time or for post well completion
planning. Data obtained using portable X-Ray Fluorescence instruments provide a cost-effective means for
optimization of both completions and production from horizontal wells.
It takes approximately 2-3 days to collect 500 to 800 data points for a single core (~25cm spacing), and 1-2 days
to collect data points from horizontal cuttings (5-10 m spacing). A major element profile, and spectral gamma
profile for a Montney core are shown below. Major elements provide the building blocks for mineralogy and
depth shifting can be applied by relating the XRF gamma to wireline or core gamma. Analyses displayed for the
core data shown here were obtained at 25 cm spacing throughout; cuttings were analyzed at 5 m spacing.
Although element profiles contain valuable information, geoscientists and engineers are more familiar with and
work with mineralogy and reservoir properties rather than elemental composition. Therefore, a normative
mineral algorithm is used to determine mineralogy from the elemental data.
Major Elements (Core): Calibrated percentages by weight of the main rock forming elements are displayed. Note scales are different for each component.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
Re
lati
ve
De
pth
(m
)
Mg Ca Si Al K Fe S
Montney Core A
Wt % Wt % Wt % Wt % Wt % Wt %0 20 0 0505010040 5
Spectral Gamma (Core): The elemental concentrations of K, U, and Th are displayed as well as total gamma and calculated TOC content. Data collected from the XRF analyses are in blue while those acquired from wire line logs are in black.
Minerology
Most geoscientists and engineers that we work with are not familiar with elemental data. The use is generallylimited to stratigraphic correlation. However, there is a significant body of data that, if converted to morefamiliar and more pertinent forms, provide a wealth of information. Reservoir properties are generally a functionof the mineralogy and fabric of the rock, not simply the elemental composition. Determination of the mineralogyfrom the elemental data provides the user with a much more powerful tool. We employ the principles ofmineralogy phase theory to construct normative mineral algorithms. XRF mineral calculations are compared toXRD results from a core below.
Mineralogy (Core): Percent by weight of calcite, dolomite, anhydrite, apatite, quartz, feldspar, illite/mica, kaolinite/chlorite, and pyrite determined by XRF normative mineral phase theory (continuous curves). Mineralogy determined by XRD are displayed as colored squares.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
Re
lati
ve
De
pth
(m
)
Amount (Wt%)
Calcite Dolomite H-Apatite Quartz Feldspar Illite/Mica Kaol/Chlor Pyrite
Montney Core A
0 50 0 0250702010050 50 0 25 0 5
Anhydrite
Examples of the XRF mineralogy model applied to two horizontal Montney wells are displayed below. The wells show similar ranges of mineral values to those of the vertical core, which provides confidence in cutting quality. Mineralogical changes can help determine stratigraphic location of the well, and be incorporated into post well completion planning.
Am
ou
nt
(Wt%
)
Relative Depth (m)
Pyrite
Kaol/Chlor
Illite/Mica
Feldspar
Quartz
Apatite
Dolomite
Calcite
Montney Lateral A
0
025
0
50
20
70
50
050
0
25
0
25
0
5
Anhydrite
Mineralogy (Horizontals): Percent by weight of calcite, dolomite, anhydrite, apatite, quartz, feldspar, illite/mica, kaolinite/chlorite, and pyrite determined by XRF normative mineral phase theory.
TOC
The detection of carbon is not possible with XRF because it is too light. However, there are several traceelements associated with organics that are detected and these are used to determine TOC. There are a numberof trace elements and metals that can be used as proxies for TOC. We show two of these, U and Mo below. Thepyrite profile is also shown as an indicator of reducing conditions whilst the Mn profile gives an indication of theoxidation state. TOC has been shown to have a large impact on porosity and mechanical properties in theMontney, with the potential of having solid bitumen in the rock.
TOC Potential (Core): Elements related to organics and redox are displayed. XRF TOC (red line) is a calculated value which indicates zones of higher and lower TOC. Lab measured TOC values overlay the calculated TOC curve. Note scales are different in each track.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
Rela
tive D
ep
th (
m)
XRF TOC WL Gamma Mn Py U Mo
Montney Core A
Wt % Counts PPM Wt% PPM PPM0 5 50 04005025000150 50
The same parameters used to determine TOC and redox conditions in the core are applied to data from horizontal wells. These parameters tend to show far less variation in the horizontal wells then in the core as the horizontal wells penetrated limited stratigraphic intervals.
Relative Depth (m)
Mo
U
Py
Mn
Gamma
XRF TOC
Montney Lateral A
PPM
PPM
Wt %
PPM
API
Wt %
0
100
0
40
0
5
0
2500
0
200
505
Relative Depth (m)
Mo
U
Py
Mn
Gamma
XRF TOC
Montney Lateral B
PPM
PPM
Wt %
PPM
API
Wt %
0
100
0
40
0
5
0
2500
0
200
505
TOC Potential (Horizontals): Elements related to organics and redox are displayed. XRF TOC (red line) is a calculated value which indicates zones of higher and lower TOC.
Mechanical Properties
Mineral composition and rock fabric parameters are used to develop algorithms for modelling mechanical properties such as Poisson’s ratio and Young’s modulus. Mechanical properties are controlled by mineralogy and fabric. Understanding these relationships makes it possible to predict the mechanical properties. Mechanical properties of unconventional reservoirs are very important in exploitation of oil and gas reserves. If a rock is too ductile or too strong it may not be possible to induce hydraulic fractures, emplace proppant or to prevent closure of fractures that do propagate.
Mechanical Properties (Core): XRF developed Poisson’s Ratio & Young’s Modulus values are displayed. Rock mechanical values acquired through dipole sonic wire line logs and lab measurements are compared to the XRF values.
0.150.200.250.300.350.400.450.500.55
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
1406 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Rel
ativ
e D
epth
(m)
Youngs Modulus (Mpsi)
Montney Core A
YM Logs
YM XRF
YM Lab
YM Smooth
PR XRF
PR Logs
PR XRF
PR Lab
PR Smooth
Poisson's Ratio
Mechanical Properties (Horizontals): XRF derived Poisson’s Ratio & Young’s Modulus values for the two horizontal wells are displayed.
0.24
0.26
0.28
0.3
0.32
0.34
0.36
0.38
0.48
9
10
11
12
13
Relative Depth (m)
Montney Lateral B
Po
isson
'sR
atio
You
ng'
s M
od
ulu
s (M
psi
)
0.24
0.26
0.28
0.3
0.32
0.34
0.36
0.38
0.48
9
10
11
12
13
Relative Depth (m)
Montney Lateral A
Poisso
n's
Ratio
You
ng'
s M
od
ulu
s (M
psi
)
Quartz and feldspars are relatively brittle (low Poisson’s Ratio) with variable rock strength (Young’s Modulus). Calcite and dolomite have high Poisson’s Ratio and Young’s Modulus. Carbonate minerals are relatively ductile but also very strong. Where carbonates are present as cement it can lead to higher pressures during fracture attempts and in some cases the rocks appear to simply deform rather than break. Clay minerals in the Montney are dominated by illite and mixed Illite-rich clays. High concentrations of these clays have a negative impact on hydraulic fracturing by making the rock more ductile and allowing fractures to close over time due to embedment.
Reservoir Properties
An XRF reservoir quality log suite is shown below for a core in the Montney Formation. The most important factors for proper evaluation of the target reservoir are gathered into one log suite. The key factors selected for this log suite are detrital framework components, total clay, total carbonate, mechanical properties, porosity and TOC. These are displayed along with resistivity and gamma wireline log data. These properties aid in the location of zones with the best reservoir properties. The parameters displayed in the reservoir quality log suite are determined from the proprietary phase theory and semi-empirical specific mineral interaction models.
Reservoir Quality (Core): Continuous colored curves show XRF derived information for mineral groups, mechanical properties, porosity and TOC. Wireline log GR and resistivity along with lab measured porosities (red squares) are also displayed.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
Re
lati
ve
De
pth
(m
)
Porosity Lab(0-7%)
Montney Core A
Wt % Wt % Wt % Mpsi Value OHM*M Wt% API
Detrital Clay Carbonates YM & PR Porosity Resistivity XRF TOC GR
40 80 0 07.00012750040 300 15050200.330.23
Formation specific algorithms are developed from vertical well data. Once these are developed they are applied to data obtained on cuttings from horizontal wells as shown below. The information obtained is particularly valuable for geosteering purposes in real time and/or post well completion planning. Data obtained using portable X-Ray Fluorescence instruments provide a rapid cost-effective means for optimization of completions and production from horizontal wells.
Relative Depth (m)
API
Wt %
Units
Vol %
MpsiUnitless
Wt %
Wt %
Wt %
Montney Lateral A
GR
XRF TOC
Gas(ROP Norm)
Porosity
YM & PR
Carbonate
Clay
Detrital 40
7.00
00.30
0.2650
20
25
570
200
502
0
11
9 /
/
300
0
Relative Depth (m)
API
Wt %
Units
Vol %
MpsiUnitless
Wt %
Wt %
Wt %
Montney Lateral B
GR
XRF TOC
Gas(ROP Norm)
Porosity
YM & PR
Carbonate
Clay
Detrital
40
7.00
00.30
0.2650
20
25
570
200
502
0
11
9 /
/
500
0
Reservoir Quality (Horizontals): Continuous colored curves show XRF derived information for mineralgroups, mechanical properties, porosity and TOC. Wireline log GR and gas data are also displayed.