Attachments
Attachment 1
NRCS Soil Report
United StatesDepartment ofAgriculture
A product of the NationalCooperative Soil Survey,a joint effort of the UnitedStates Department ofAgriculture and otherFederal agencies, Stateagencies including theAgricultural ExperimentStations, and localparticipants
Custom Soil Resource Report for
Carver County, MinnesotaRon Olson Property
NaturalResourcesConservationService
December 11, 2020
PrefaceSoil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/?cid=nrcs142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2
alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
3
ContentsPreface.................................................................................................................... 2How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5Soil Map.................................................................................................................. 8
Soil Map................................................................................................................9Legend................................................................................................................10Map Unit Legend................................................................................................ 11
References............................................................................................................13
4
How Soil Surveys Are MadeSoil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units). Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
5
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map. The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
Custom Soil Resource Report
6
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
Custom Soil Resource Report
7
Soil MapThe soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
8
9
Custom Soil Resource ReportSoil Map
4950
500
4950
600
4950
700
4950
800
4950
900
4951
000
4951
100
4951
200
4951
300
4951
400
4951
500
4950
500
4950
600
4950
700
4950
800
4950
900
4951
000
4951
100
4951
200
4951
300
4951
400
4951
500
442800 442900 443000 443100 443200 443300 443400 443500 443600 443700 443800 443900 444000 444100 444200 444300
442800 442900 443000 443100 443200 443300 443400 443500 443600 443700 443800 443900 444000 444100 444200 444300
44° 42' 53'' N93
° 4
3' 2
3'' W
44° 42' 53'' N
93° 4
2' 1
0'' W
44° 42' 19'' N
93° 4
3' 2
3'' W
44° 42' 19'' N
93° 4
2' 1
0'' W
N
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 15N WGS840 350 700 1400 2100
Feet0 100 200 400 600
MetersMap Scale: 1:7,350 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)Area of Interest (AOI)
SoilsSoil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point FeaturesBlowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water FeaturesStreams and Canals
TransportationRails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
BackgroundAerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation ServiceWeb Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Carver County, MinnesotaSurvey Area Data: Version 17, Jun 5, 2020
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Sep 12, 2010—Aug 2, 2016
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Custom Soil Resource Report
10
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
AE Hawick loamy sand, 20 to 40 percent slopes
14.1 7.6%
CO Cordova clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
2.6 1.4%
CW Cordova-Webster complex 23.1 12.5%
EB2 Estherville sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded
16.2 8.8%
GL Glencoe clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes
2.9 1.6%
GP Pits-Udipsamments complex 1.3 0.7%
HC Estherville-Hawick sandy loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes
0.1 0.0%
HC2 Estherville-Hawick sandy loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded
25.1 13.6%
HD Estherville-Hawick sandy loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes
2.2 1.2%
KM Minneiska-Kalmarville complex, frequently flooded
15.2 8.2%
LA Le Sueur-Lester complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes
30.5 16.5%
LB2 Lester loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
8.2 4.4%
LC Lester loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
0.2 0.1%
LC2 Lester loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded
4.2 2.3%
LD Lester loam, 10 to 16 percent slopes
0.8 0.5%
LD2 Lester loam, 10 to 16 percent slopes, moderately eroded
1.1 0.6%
LF Lester loam, 22 to 40 percent slopes
13.7 7.5%
LS Le Sueur loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes
1.7 0.9%
TB Terril loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
5.2 2.8%
WA Wadena loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
1.0 0.6%
XB Rasset-Lester complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes
14.8 8.0%
XC2 Rasset-Lester complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded
0.2 0.1%
Custom Soil Resource Report
11
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
Totals for Area of Interest 184.2 100.0%
Custom Soil Resource Report
12
9
Custom Soil Resource ReportSoil Map
4950
880
4950
970
4951
060
4951
150
4951
240
4951
330
4951
420
4950
880
4950
970
4951
060
4951
150
4951
240
4951
330
443220 443310 443400 443490 443580 443670 443760 443850 443940 444030
443220 443310 443400 443490 443580 443670 443760 443850 443940 444030
44° 42' 50'' N93
° 4
3' 1
'' W44° 42' 50'' N
93° 4
2' 2
2'' W
44° 42' 32'' N
93° 4
3' 1
'' W
44° 42' 32'' N
93° 4
2' 2
2'' W
N
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 15N WGS840 150 300 600 900
Feet0 50 100 200 300
MetersMap Scale: 1:3,870 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Table—Hydrologic Soil Group (Ron Olson )
Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
AE Hawick loamy sand, 20 to 40 percent slopes
A 0.2 0.5%
CW Cordova-Webster complex
C/D 4.0 10.9%
EB2 Estherville sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded
A 7.8 21.2%
GP Pits-Udipsamments complex
1.0 2.8%
HC2 Estherville-Hawick sandy loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded
A 17.8 48.4%
HD Estherville-Hawick sandy loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes
A 1.4 3.8%
LA Le Sueur-Lester complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes
C/D 0.0 0.1%
LS Le Sueur loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes
C/D 0.2 0.5%
XB Rasset-Lester complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes
A 4.3 11.8%
Totals for Area of Interest 36.8 100.0%
Rating Options—Hydrologic Soil Group (Ron Olson )
Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition
Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified
Tie-break Rule: Higher
Custom Soil Resource Report
16
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
AE Hawick loamy sand, 20 to 40 percent slopes
0.2 0.5%
CW Cordova-Webster complex 4.0 10.9%
EB2 Estherville sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded
7.8 21.2%
GP Pits-Udipsamments complex 1.0 2.8%
HC2 Estherville-Hawick sandy loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded
17.8 48.4%
HD Estherville-Hawick sandy loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes
1.4 3.8%
LA Le Sueur-Lester complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes
0.0 0.1%
LS Le Sueur loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes
0.2 0.5%
XB Rasset-Lester complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes
4.3 11.8%
Totals for Area of Interest 36.8 100.0%
Map Unit DescriptionsThe map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
Custom Soil Resource Report
11
14
Custom Soil Resource ReportMap—Hydrologic Soil Group (Ron Olson )
4950
880
4950
970
4951
060
4951
150
4951
240
4951
330
4951
420
4950
880
4950
970
4951
060
4951
150
4951
240
4951
330
443220 443310 443400 443490 443580 443670 443760 443850 443940 444030
443220 443310 443400 443490 443580 443670 443760 443850 443940 444030
44° 42' 50'' N93
° 4
3' 1
'' W44° 42' 50'' N
93° 4
2' 2
2'' W
44° 42' 32'' N
93° 4
3' 1
'' W
44° 42' 32'' N
93° 4
2' 2
2'' W
N
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 15N WGS840 150 300 600 900
Feet0 50 100 200 300
MetersMap Scale: 1:3,870 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
28
Custom Soil Resource ReportMap—Farmland Classification (Mine Limits )
4950
880
4950
970
4951
060
4951
150
4951
240
4951
330
4951
420
4950
880
4950
970
4951
060
4951
150
4951
240
4951
330
443220 443310 443400 443490 443580 443670 443760 443850 443940 444030
443220 443310 443400 443490 443580 443670 443760 443850 443940 444030
44° 42' 50'' N93
° 4
3' 1
'' W44° 42' 50'' N
93° 4
2' 2
2'' W
44° 42' 32'' N
93° 4
3' 1
'' W
44° 42' 32'' N
93° 4
2' 2
2'' W
N
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 15N WGS840 150 300 600 900
Feet0 50 100 200 300
MetersMap Scale: 1:3,870 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Table—Farmland Classification (Mine Limits )
Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
AE Hawick loamy sand, 20 to 40 percent slopes
Not prime farmland 0.2 0.5%
CW Cordova-Webster complex
Prime farmland if drained 4.0 10.9%
EB2 Estherville sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded
Farmland of statewide importance
7.8 21.2%
GP Pits-Udipsamments complex
Not prime farmland 1.0 2.8%
HC2 Estherville-Hawick sandy loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded
Not prime farmland 17.8 48.4%
HD Estherville-Hawick sandy loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes
Not prime farmland 1.4 3.8%
LA Le Sueur-Lester complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes
All areas are prime farmland
0.0 0.1%
LS Le Sueur loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes
All areas are prime farmland
0.2 0.5%
XB Rasset-Lester complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Farmland of statewide importance
4.3 11.8%
Totals for Area of Interest 36.8 100.0%
Rating Options—Farmland Classification (Mine Limits )
Aggregation Method: No Aggregation Necessary
Tie-break Rule: Lower
Custom Soil Resource Report
32
ReferencesAmerican Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084
13
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf
Custom Soil Resource Report
14
Attachment 2
Wetland Delineation Report
13605 1st Avenue North #100, Plymouth, MN 55441 P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090
ae-mn.com
WETLAND INVESTIGATION
RONALD OLSON PROPERTY PARCELS 080041400, 080041300
CARVER, CARVER CO., MINNESOTA
November 2, 2020 AE JOB NO. 16087
TABLE OF CONTENTS
WETLAND INVESTIGATION Ronald Olson Property Carver County, MN
November 2, 2020 P a g e 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTACT INFORMATION ...............................................................................................................................2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................3
BACKGROUND ...............................................................................................................................................4
METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................................................................4
RESOURCE REVIEW ........................................................................................................................................5
FIELD REVIEW ................................................................................................................................................7
CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................................................9
APPENDICES Appendix A FIGURES
Appendix B ROUTINE ON-SITE DETERMINATION METHOD DATASHEETS
Appendix C SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Appendix D ANTECEDENT PRECIPITATION RECORD
Appendix E OFF-SITE AGRICULTURE REVIEW
Appendix F CREDENTIALS
CONTACT INFORMATION
WETLAND INVESTIGATION Ronald Olson Property Carver County, MN
November 2, 2020 P a g e 2
CONTACT INFORMATION PREPARED FOR:
Ronald Olson 6970 Inwood Road Cologne, MN 55322 (612) [email protected]
ENGINEERING CONSULTANT:
Kirsten Pauly, PE/PG Sunde Engineering, PLLC. 10830 Nesbitt Avenue South Bloomington, MN 55437 (952) [email protected]
PREPARED BY:
Dylan Kruzel Environmental Associate
Alex Yellick Environmental Associate Certified MN Wetland Delineator #1354
Ben Hodapp Environmental Services Manager Certified MN Wetland Delineator #1016 [email protected]
Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC 13605 1st Avenue North Suite 100 Plymouth, MN 55441 Phone: (763) 412-4000 Fax: (763) 412-4090
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
WETLAND INVESTIGATION Ronald Olson Property Carver County, MN
November 2, 2020 P a g e 3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC was retained to provide professional wetland services using the 1987 United States Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (Technical Report Y-87-1; January 1987) and all supplemental guidance documents to identify areas meeting wetland criteria in the property identified by Carver County as parcel number 080041400 and a portion of parcel 080041300 located in Carver, Minnesota. The parcel is in Section 4, Township 114 North, Range 24 West.
Three wetlands or, portions thereof, was identified and delineated within the project area. The wetlands are summarized in Table 1 and depicted in Appendix A, Figure 5.
Table 1. Summary of delineated wetlands, corresponding sizes, and wetland type classifications.
WETLAND APPROXIMATE SIZE (ac) within project area
WETLAND TYPE CLASSIFICATION
CIRCULAR 39 COWARDIN EGGERS & REED
1 0.50 Type 2 PEM1B Fresh Wet Meadow
2 0.07 Type 1 PEM1A Seasonally Flooded Basin
3 0.01 Type 1 PEM1A Seasonally Flooded Basin
BACKGROUND & METHODOLOGY
WETLAND INVESTIGATION Ronald Olson Property Carver County, MN
November 2, 2020 P a g e 4
BACKGROUND As requested by Sunde Engineering, Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC completed a wetland investigation at the property identified by Carver County as parcel number 080041400 and a portion of parcel 080041300 located in Carver, Minnesota (Appendix A, Figure 1). The parcel is in Section 4, Township 114 North, Range 24 West.
The wetland delineation was completed in accordance with the 1987 United States Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the published regional supplement to the Army Corps Wetland Delineation Manual, Midwest Region.
The purpose of this study was to identify areas meeting the technical criteria for wetlands, delineate the jurisdictional extent of the wetland basins, and classify the wetland habitats in the project area.
Fieldwork for this site investigation was completed by Environmental Associate, Dylan Kruzel and Alex Yellick, on August 5, 2020 and October 30, 2020. The weather in August was sunny and 75 degrees Fahrenheit; overcast and 42 degrees Fahrenheit in October.
METHODOLOGY U.S. Geologic Service 7.5” Topographic Quadrangle maps, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Public Water Inventory (PWI) maps, U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey, and available aerial photographs were consulted to initially locate potential wetland habitats.
Routine on-site Determination Method was used during this investigation. In this method, the following procedures were used:
1. The vegetative community was sampled in all present strata to determine whether it met hydrophyticvegetation criteria based on the indicators identified in the Midwest Regional Supplement.
2. Soil pits were dug using a Dutch auger to depths of sixteen to thirty-six inches. The soil profile was notedin addition to any hydric soil characteristics.
3. Signs of wetland hydrology were noted and compared to field criteria such as depth to shallow watertable and depth of soil saturation found in the soil pits.
Data from sample points were recorded on Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Wetland Determination Data Forms (Appendix B). At least one sample point transect crosses the delineated wetland edge. This transect consists of an upland sample point and a wetland sample point. Other sample points may be in areas which have one or more other wetland criteria present; where questionable conditions exist; or to verify the absence of wetland criteria. Photographs were also taken of each resource (Appendix C).
Sample points were marked in the field with orange flags. The identified wetland boundary was marked with sequentially numbered pink flags. Active agricultural cropped areas were not physically marked. All sample points and the delineated wetland boundary were located using a Trimble Geo XH sub-meter GPS unit.
FIELD REVIEW
WETLAND INVESTIGATION Ronald Olson Property Carver County, MN
November 2, 2020 P a g e 5
RESOURCE REVIEW The following resources were reviewed to supplement the wetland field delineation: NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY The National Wetlands Inventory identifies one PEM1A and PEM1Af in the project extent (Appendix A, Figure 2). USDA – NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE SOIL SURVEY Soil survey data for Carver County was obtained and reviewed prior to the delineation. Table 2 provides a list of the mapped soils in the project area. Figure 3 in Appendix A is a map of the soil units with percent hydric components.
Table 2. Summary of mapped soil units in the project area.
MAP UNIT SYMBOL MAP UNIT NAME HYDRIC STATUS HYDRIC RATING DRAINAGE CLASS SITE COVERAGE
HC2
Estherville-Hawick sandy loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes,
eroded
Non-Hydric 0% Somewhat excessively
drained 30.1%
EB2
Estherville sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent
slopes, eroded
Predominately Non-Hydric 5%
Somewhat excessively
drained 17.0%
CW Cardova-Webster complex
Hydric 100% Poorly drained 15.6%
XB Rasset-Lester
complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Non-Hydric 0% Well drained 14.7%
TB Terril loam, 2 to
6 percent slopes
Predominately Non-Hydric 8% Well drained 5.5%
HD
Estherville-Hawick sandy
loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes
Non-Hydric 0% Somewhat excessively
drained 3.2%
AE Hawick loamy sand, 20 to 40 percent slopes
Non-Hydric 0% Excessively drained 3.1%
GL Glencoe clay loam, 0 to 1
percent slopes Hydric 100% Very poorly
drained 2.4%
FIELD REVIEW
WETLAND INVESTIGATION Ronald Olson Property Carver County, MN
November 2, 2020 P a g e 6
Table 2. Summary of mapped soil units in the project area.
MAP UNIT SYMBOL MAP UNIT NAME HYDRIC STATUS HYDRIC RATING DRAINAGE CLASS SITE COVERAGE
LA Le Sueur loam, 1 to 6 percent
slopes
Predominately Non-Hydric 10% Somewhat
poorly drained 2.4%
LB2 Lester loam, 2 to 6 percent
slopes
Predominately Non-Hydric 10% Well drained 2.2%
GP Pits-
Udipsamments complex
No Rating 0% No Classification 2.0%
WA Wadena loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes
Predominately Non-Hydric 1% Well drained 1.6%
LS Le Sueur loam, 1 to 3 percent
slopes
Predominately Non-Hydric 15% Somewhat
poorly drained 0.3%
HC
Estherville-Hawick sandy loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes
Non-Hydric 0% Somewhat excessively
drained 0.1%
XC2
Rasset-Lester complex, 6 to
12 percent slopes
Non-Hydric 0% Well drained 0%
Hydric soils are defined in the Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States: Guide for Identifying and Delineating Hydric Soils, version 8.2, 2018; The 1987 United States Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual; and The Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region (Version 2.0).
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES PUBLIC WATER INVENTORY The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Public Water Inventory for Carver County does not identify public water in the project extent (Appendix A, Figure 4).
30-DAY ROLLING PRECIPITATION DATAA review of the 30-day rolling precipitation data collected from the University of Minnesota Climatology WorkingGroup (Appendix D) indicates that precipitation totals for the weeks prior to the site visit were below the range ofaverage in the general project area. The overall hydrologic conditions were suitable, however, for completing anaccurate wetland determination and boundary delineation.
OFFSITE HYDROLOGY REVIEW An offsite hydrology review was completed in accordance with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/Board of Soil and Water Resources Guidance for Offsite Hydrology/Wetland Determination (July 2016). A total of five investigation areas were identified based on review of aerial photos from 2000 to 2019. A total of five aerial photos (2009,
FIELD REVIEW
WETLAND INVESTIGATION Ronald Olson Property Carver County, MN
November 2, 2020 P a g e 7
2011, 2013, 2015, and 2017) representing normal precipitation conditions were used in the analysis (Appendix E). The analysis revealed the presence of wet signatures in all five investigation areas. This data, along with other offsite information (i.e., National Wetland Inventory, County Soil Survey) was used to inform if the secondary hydrology indicator, saturation visible on aerial imagery was checked on wetland determination forms.
FIELD REVIEW WETLAND 1
Wetland 1 is a type 2, PEM1B, fresh wet meadow that extends offsite to the east. The onsite portion is approximately 0.5 acre (Appendix A, Figure 5). The dominant vegetation in the wetland area consisted of reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea). The underlying soils are mapped as the predominantly non-hydric Terril loam. The investigated soil profile met the Loamy Mucky Mineral hydric soil indicator. Observed hydrology indicators include high water table, saturation, geomorphic position, saturation visible on aerial photography, and FAC-neutral test.
The wetland-upland transition areas are formed by steep slopes and are dominated by facultative upland orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata) and common timothy (Phleum pretense). Hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology was absent in the upland.
WETLAND 2
Wetland 2 is a type 1, PEM1A, seasonally flooded basin that is entirely contained within the project area. The area is separated from Wetland 1 by a vegetated berm and surface connection is not present. The wetland is approximately 0.07 acre (Appendix A, Figure 5). Vegetation is not present and considered disturbed due to sedimentation and/or drowned out. The underlying soils are mapped as the non-hydric Hawick loamy sand. The investigated soil profile was determined to be problematic due to presence of approximately 24” of eroded depositional sediment and assumed hydric based on the presence of qualifying redox dark surface features below the eroded material. The hydrology indicators observed include surface soil cracks, saturation visible on aerial photography, and geomorphic position.
The wetland-upland transition areas are formed by moderate slopes, are dominated by smooth brome (Bromus inermis), prostate pigweed (Amaranthus bilitoides), and rough pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus). Hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology criteria was not met in the upland position.
WETLAND 3
Wetland 3 is a type 1, PEM1A, seasonally flooded basin that is entirely contained within the project area. The area receives hydrology from drain tile outlets and abruptly transitions to a deeply incised ephemeral flow path/drainage. The wetland is approximately 0.01 acre (Appendix A, Figure 5). Vegetation consists of purple-stem aster (Symphyotrichum puniceum) and reed canary grass. The underlying soils met thick dark surface (A12) hydric soil indicator. The hydrology indicators observed include saturation, dry-season water table, geomorphic position, and FAC-neutral test.
The wetland-upland transition areas are formed by steep slopes, are dominated by American elm (Ulmus americana), boxelder (Acer negundo), and purple-stem aster. Wetland hydrology criteria was not met in the upland position.
FIELD REVIEW
WETLAND INVESTIGATION Ronald Olson Property Carver County, MN
November 2, 2020 P a g e 8
INVESTIGATION AREA A
Investigation Area A is a cultivated vegetated swale area located in the northeast corner of the property (Appendix A, Figure 5). The area is a sloped depression in the hydric Cardova-Webster complex. Aerial imagery suggested that the area may be saturated four years of the five normal years reviewed, however, wetland hydrology criteria was not met due to the presence of a functional drain tile stystem. Therefore, the area was determined upland.
INVESTIGATION AREA B
Investigation Area B is a cropped area under soy bean rotation located in the north portion of the project area (Appendix A, Figure 5). The area is a depression in the hydric soil unit Cardova-Webster complex. Aerial imagery suggested that the area may be saturated four of the five normal years reviewed, however, wetland hydrology criteria was not met. Therefore, the area was determined upland.
INVESTIGATION AREA C
Investigation Area C is a cultivated nonwetland swale area located in the southeast portion of the project area (Appendix A, Figure 5). The area is a sloped depression in the nonhydric soil unit, Rasset-Lester complex. Aerial imagery suggested that the area may be saturated two of five normal years reviewed, however, indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology were not met. Therefore, the area was determined upland.
INVESTIGATION AREA D
Investigation Area D is a cropped area under soy bean rotation located in the southeast corner of the project area (Appendix A, Figure 5). The area is a sloped depression in the nonhydric soil unit Estherville-Hawick sandy loams. Aerial imagery suggested that the area may be saturated three of five normal years reviewed, however, indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology were not met. Therefore, the area was determined upland.
INVESTIGATION AREA E
Investigation Area E is a cropped area under soy bean rotation located in the southeast corner of the project area (Appendix A, Figure 5). The area is a sloped depression in the nonhydric soil unit Estherville-Hawick sandy loams. Aerial imagery suggested that the area may be saturated one of five normal years reviewed and indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology were not met. Therefore, the area was determined upland.
INVESTIGATION AREA F
Investigation Area F is a cultivated area located in the west portion of the property (Appendix A, Figure 5). The area is a depression in the hydric Cordova-Webster complex. Aerial imagery suggested that the area may be saturated four years of the five normal years reviewed, however, wetland hydrology criteria was not met to the presence of a functioning drain tile system. Therefore, the area was determined upland.
CONCLUSION
WETLAND INVESTIGATION Ronald Olson Property Carver County, MN
November 2, 2020 P a g e 9
I certify that I performed the field analysis and/or wrote the report for this wetland determination.
_________________________________ ___________________ Dylan Kruzel Date Environmental Associate
I certify that I performed the field analysis and/or wrote the report for this wetland determination.
_________________________________ ___________________ Alex Yellick Date Environmental Associate MN Certified Wetland Delineator #1354 I certify that I performed the field analysis and/or reviewed work completed by above staff.
_________________________________ ___________________ Benjamin J Hodapp, PWS Date Environmental Services Manager MN Certified Wetland Delineator #1016
CONCLUSION Three wetlands, or portions thereof, were identified and delineated in accordance with the 1987 United States Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual in the project area.
The wetlands in the project area may be regulated by several agencies at the local, state, and/or federal level. Activities which may potentially impact wetlands should be discussed in advance with the appropriate regulating agency regarding potential permit requirements. The Local Government Unit (LGU) responsible for implementing the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act at this project location is Carver County.
County may require vegetated buffers around all regulated wetland areas. Wetland buffers must meet the standards specified by the county for any project that is regulated under the Wetland Conservation Act.
This wetland investigation meets the standards and criteria described in the 1987 United States Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and all applicable subsequent guidance for an on-site determination. The results reflect the conditions present at the time of the delineation.
November 2, 2020
November 2, 2020
November 2, 2020
Appendix A FIGURES
_̂
Latitude: 44.714004Longitude: -93.710125
Legend_̂Project Location
SOURCE: MnDNR, USDA, ESRI, TIGER, Bing, Carver Co., Anderson Engineering
Project Location
San Francisco TownshipCarver County, MN13605 1st Ave N #100, Plymouth, MN 55441
P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com
Olson PropertyCarver County, MN
Figure 1Project Location
PID: 080041400Project No: 16087Date: 10.15.2020
I1 inch = 2 miles0 2 41
Miles
PEM1A
PEM1Af
PEM1A
PEM1C
PEM1Af
PEM1C
PUBG
PEM1A
PEM1A
PEM1C
PEM1A
PEM1A
R2UBGR2UBG
LegendProject ParcelCarver Co. ParcelsNational Wetland Inventory
SOURCE: MnDNR, USDA, ESRI, TIGER, Bing, Carver Co., Anderson Engineering
Project Location
San Francisco TownshipCarver County, MN13605 1st Ave N #100, Plymouth, MN 55441
P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com
Olson PropertyCarver County, MN
Figure 2National Wetland Inventory
PID: 080041400Project No: 16087Date: 10.15.2020
I1 inch = 400 feet0 400 800200
Feet
2019 Carver Co. Imagery
LA
LA
LA
W
AE
AE
AE
AE
CWCW
CW
XC2
LA
LA
LA
WA
XBXB
XB
LB2
LC2
LC2 LF
LD
GL
LB2
LB2
HD
HD
EB2
EB2
LS
HC2
HC2
GP
GP
LF
HC
KM
TB
TB
TB
LD2
LegendProject ParcelCarver Co. Parcels
Hydric Rating by Map Unit0% Hydric Components1-32% Hydric Components33-65% Hydric Components66-99% Hydric Components100% Hydric Components
SOURCE: MnDNR, USDA, ESRI, TIGER, Bing, Carver Co., Anderson Engineering
Project Location
San Francisco TownshipCarver County, MN13605 1st Ave N #100, Plymouth, MN 55441
P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com
Olson PropertyCarver County, MN
Figure 3Carver Co. Soil Survey
PID: 080041400Project No: 16087Date: 10.15.2020
I1 inch = 400 feet0 400 800200
Feet
10023100
10002000
10004000
100228001002280010022800
Minn
esota
Rive
r (M-05
5)
Silver Creek
(M-055-027-001)
Bevens Creek(M-055-027)
LegendProject ParcelCarver Co. ParcelsMN DNR InventoriedPublic WatercourseMN DNR InventoriedPublic Waterbasin
SOURCE: MnDNR, USDA, ESRI, TIGER, Bing, Carver Co., Anderson Engineering
Project Location
San Francisco TownshipCarver County, MN13605 1st Ave N #100, Plymouth, MN 55441
P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com
Olson PropertyCarver County, MN
Figure 4MnDNR Public Water Inventory
PID: 080041400Project No: 16087Date: 10.15.2020
I1 inch = 0.5 miles0 0.5 10.25
Miles
2019 Carver Co. Imagery
2A
1A
Wetland 2Type 1PEM1A
SeasonallyFlooded Basin
0.07 Ac.Wetland 3
Type 1PEM1A
SeasonallyFlooded Basin
0.01 Ac.
IA-E
IA-F
3B3A
IA-A
IA-B
1B
2B
IA-C
IA-D
Wetland 1Type 2PEM1BFresh
Wet Meadow0.50 Ac.
LegendProject ParcelCarver Co. ParcelsWetland Field Delineated8/4/2020 & 10/30/2020Sample PointDrain Tile Inlet/Outlet
SOURCE: MnDNR, USDA, ESRI, TIGER, Bing, Carver Co., Anderson Engineering
Project Location
San Francisco TownshipCarver County, MN13605 1st Ave N #100, Plymouth, MN 55441
P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com
Olson PropertyCarver County, MN
Figure 5Delineation
PID: 080041400Project No: 16087Date: 11.2.2020
I1 inch = 400 feet0 400 800200
Feet
2019 Carver Co. Imagery
Appendix B ROUTINE ON-SITE DETERMINATION METHOD DATASHEETS
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Project/Site: Carver County Parcel 080041400 City/County: San Francisco TWP, Carver County Sampling Date: 08/04/2020
Applicant/Owner: Sunde Engineering, PLLC State: MN Sampling Point: 1A
Investigator(s): A. Yellick, D. Kruzel Section, Township, Range: S. 4, Twp. 114N, R. 24W
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Outwash - TS Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Slope(%): 0 Lat: 44.7119767 Long: -93.70704746 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Terril loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes (TB) NWI classification: PEM1Af
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Areawithin a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:Area is below a drain tile inlet and hydrology is not impacted at this location. Area receives hydrology from upland vegetated swale. Area meets wetlandcriteria and is a Type 2, PEM1B, fresh wet meadow. Antecedent precipitation is below normal for the time of year.
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.Dominance Test worksheet:Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 5 x 1 = 5
FACW species 95 x 2 = 190
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
FACU species 5 x 4 = 20
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 105 (A) 215 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.05
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic VegetationX
2 - Dominance Test is >50%X
3 - Prevalence Index ≤3.0¹X
4 - Morphological Adaptations¹ (Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation¹ (Explain)
¹Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet ) %Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 feet )
1. Salix interior / Sandbar willow 5 Yes FACW
2.
3.
4.
5.
5 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 feet )
1. Phalaris arundinacea / Reed canarygrass, Reed canary grass 90 Yes FACW
2. Scirpus atrovirens / Green bulrush 5 No OBL
3. Cirsium arvense / Canada thistle 5 No FACU
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
100 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
1.
2.
0 = Total Cover
HydrophyticVegetationPresent? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point: 1A
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type¹ Loc² Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 2/1 100 Muck loam Sapric
8-16 10YR 2/1 98 10YR 3/4 2 C M Mucky loam Sapric
¹Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ²Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils³:Histosol (A1) Sandy Gleyed Marix (S4) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7)
Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) X Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Other (Explain in Remarks)
2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ³Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present,
5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGYWetland Hydrology Indicators:Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Water (A1) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
X High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10)
X Saturation (A3) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Water Marks (B1) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) X Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) X Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Gauge or Well Data (D9)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:Offsite Wetland Hydrology review Area C: 5 of 5 normal years showed wet signatures. Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery indicator is met. Saturatedsoil and water table is observed at the surface
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Project/Site: Carver County Parcel 080041400 City/County: San Francisco TWP, Carver County Sampling Date: 08/04/2020
Applicant/Owner: Sunde Engineering, PLLC State: MN Sampling Point: 1B
Investigator(s): A. Yellick, D. Kruzel Section, Township, Range: S. 4, Twp. 114N, R. 24W
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Outwash - BS Local relief (concave, convex, none): None
Slope(%): 3 Lat: 44.71176198 Long: -93.70720674 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Terril loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes (TB) NWI classification: PEM1Af
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Is the Sampled Areawithin a Wetland? Yes No X
Remarks:Area does not meet wetland criteria. Antecedent precipitation is below normal for the time of year.
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.Dominance Test worksheet:Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 5 x 1 = 5
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
FACU species 110 x 4 = 440
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 115 (A) 445 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.87
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index ≤3.0¹
4 - Morphological Adaptations¹ (Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation¹ (Explain)
¹Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet ) %Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 feet )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 feet )
1. Dactylis glomerata / Orchardgrass 50 Yes FACU
2. Phleum pratense / Common timothy, Cultivated timothy 40 Yes FACU
3. Bromus inermis / Smooth brome, Smooth brome, Hungarian brome20 No FACU
4. Boltonia asteroides / White doll's daisy 5 No OBL
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
115 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
1.
2.
0 = Total Cover
HydrophyticVegetationPresent? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point: 1B
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type¹ Loc² Texture Remarks
0-16 10YR 2/1 60 10YR 3/4 40 C M Loam Distinct redox concentration
16-24 10YR 2/1 95 10YR 3/4 5 C M Loamy sand Distinct redox concentration
¹Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ²Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils³:Histosol (A1) Sandy Gleyed Marix (S4) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7)
Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Other (Explain in Remarks)
2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) X Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ³Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present,
5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGYWetland Hydrology Indicators:Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Water (A1) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Water Marks (B1) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) X Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Gauge or Well Data (D9)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:Offsite Wetland Hydrology review Area C: 5 of 5 normal years showed wet signatures. Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery indicator is met. Functionaldrain tile is present lower than the sampled area. Geomorphic position is not met
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Project/Site: Carver County Parcel 080041400 City/County: San Francisco TWP, Carver County Sampling Date: 08/04/2020
Applicant/Owner: Sunde Engineering, PLLC State: MN Sampling Point: 2A
Investigator(s): A. Yellick, D. Kruzel Section, Township, Range: S. 4, Twp. 114N, R. 24W
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Outwash - TS Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Slope(%): 0 Lat: 44.71236816 Long: -93.70690234 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Hawick loamy sand, 20 to 40 percent slopes (AE) NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X , Soil X , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation X , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Areawithin a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:The area is an eroded/drowned-out basin. Area meets wetland criteria and is a Type 1, PEM1A, seasonally flooded basin. Antecedent precipitation isbelow normal for the time of year. This resource is separated from Resource 1 by a vegetated berm and no direct surface water connection is present.
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.Dominance Test worksheet:Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 0 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 0.0
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic VegetationX
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index ≤3.0¹
4 - Morphological Adaptations¹ (Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation¹ (Explain)X
¹Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet ) %Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 feet )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 feet )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
0 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
1.
2.
0 = Total Cover
HydrophyticVegetationPresent? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Area appears to have been drowned out/sedimented in. The area is judged to support a predominance of hydrophytes if the disturbance was notpresent.
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point: 2A
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type¹ Loc² Texture Remarks
0-24 10YR 3/2 100 Silt Eroded material
24-32 10YR 2/1 90 10YR 3/4 10 C M Silt loam Native, distinct redox concentration
32-40 10YR 2/1 98 10YR 3/4 2 C M Loam Distinct redox concentration
40-42+ 10YR 2/1 100 Loam
¹Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ²Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils³:Histosol (A1) Sandy Gleyed Marix (S4) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7)
Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) X Other (Explain in Remarks)
2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ³Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present,
5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:The native soil profile would have met hydric soil criteria redox dark surface if the sediment was removed.
HYDROLOGYWetland Hydrology Indicators:Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Water (A1) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) X Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Water Marks (B1) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) X Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) X Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Gauge or Well Data (D9)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 24
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:Offsite Wetland Hydrology review Area C: 5 of 5 normal years showed wet signatures. Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery indicator is met. Saturationobserved at 24 but water table was not observed below. Saturation indicator not met.
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Project/Site: Carver County Parcel 080041400 City/County: San Francisco TWP, Carver County Sampling Date: 08/04/2020
Applicant/Owner: Sunde Engineering, PLLC State: MN Sampling Point: 2B
Investigator(s): A. Yellick, D. Kruzel Section, Township, Range: S. 4, Twp. 114N, R. 24W
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Outwash - BS Local relief (concave, convex, none): None
Slope(%): 3 Lat: 44.71215578 Long: -93.70701732 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Terril loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes (TB) NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Is the Sampled Areawithin a Wetland? Yes No X
Remarks:Area is adjacent to highly erodible cultivated slope. Normal circumstances are not thought to be present because of sediment and recent disturbance inthe area. Area does not meet wetland criteria. Antecedent precipitation is below normal for the time of year.
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.Dominance Test worksheet:Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
FACU species 20 x 4 = 80
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 20 (A) 80 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.0
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index ≤3.0¹
4 - Morphological Adaptations¹ (Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation¹ (Explain)
¹Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet ) %Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 feet )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 feet )
1. Bromus inermis / Smooth brome, Smooth brome, Hungarian brome10 Yes FACU
2. Amaranthus retroflexus / Rough pigweed, Redroot pigweed 5 Yes FACU
3. Amaranthus blitoides / Prostrate pigweed, Procumbent pigweed 5 Yes FACU
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
20 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
1.
2.
0 = Total Cover
HydrophyticVegetationPresent? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point: 2B
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type¹ Loc² Texture Remarks
0-22 10YR 2/2 98 10YR 3/4 2 C M Silt loam Eroded material, distinct redox concentration
22-32 10YR 2/1 95 10YR 3/4 5 C M Loam Native, distinct redox concentration
¹Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ²Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils³:Histosol (A1) Sandy Gleyed Marix (S4) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7)
Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) X Other (Explain in Remarks)
2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ³Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present,
5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:The area would have met redox dark surface hydric soil criteria if the sediment layer was absent.
HYDROLOGYWetland Hydrology Indicators:Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Water (A1) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Water Marks (B1) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Gauge or Well Data (D9)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Project/Site: Carver County Parcel 080041400 City/County: San Francisco TWP, Carver County Sampling Date: 10/30/2020
Applicant/Owner: Sunde Engineering, PLLC State: MN Sampling Point: 3-A
Investigator(s): A. Yellick, D. Kruzel Section, Township, Range: S. 4, Twp. 114N, R. 24W
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Outwash - TS Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Slope(%): 0 Lat: 44.71163503 Long: -93.71585449 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: CW NWI classification: PEM1A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Areawithin a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:Hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology are present. Area meets wetland criteria.Antecedent precipitation is above the range of normal for the time of year.
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.Dominance Test worksheet:Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 20 x 1 = 20
FACW species 12 x 2 = 24
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 32 (A) 44 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.38
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic VegetationX
2 - Dominance Test is >50%X
3 - Prevalence Index ≤3.0¹X
4 - Morphological Adaptations¹ (Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation¹ (Explain)
¹Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet ) %Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 feet )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 feet )
1. Symphyotrichum puniceum / Purple-stem american-aster 20 Yes OBL
2. Phalaris arundinacea / Reed canarygrass, Reed canary grass 10 Yes FACW
3. Polygonum amphibium / Water smartweed 2 No FACW
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
32 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
1.
2.
0 = Total Cover
HydrophyticVegetationPresent? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Smart weed is synest
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point: 3-A
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type¹ Loc² Texture Remarks
0-16 10YR 2/1 100 Loam
16-24 10YR 4/2 95 10YR 3/6 5 M L Prominent redox conc.
¹Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ²Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils³:Histosol (A1) Sandy Gleyed Marix (S4) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7)
Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Other (Explain in Remarks)
2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ³Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present,
5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGYWetland Hydrology Indicators:Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Water (A1) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10)
X Saturation (A3) True Aquatic Plants (B14) X Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Water Marks (B1) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) X Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Gauge or Well Data (D9)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 16
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 12
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:Offsite Wetland Hydrology review Area A: 4 of 5 normal years showed wet signatures. Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery indicator is met.
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Project/Site: Carver County Parcel 080041400 City/County: San Francisco TWO, Carver County Sampling Date: 10/30/2020
Applicant/Owner: Sunde Engineering, PLLC State: MN Sampling Point: 3-B
Investigator(s): A. Yellick, D. Kruzel Section, Township, Range: S. 4, Twp. 114N, R. 24W
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Outwash - TS Local relief (concave, convex, none): None
Slope(%): 3 Lat: 44.71160249 Long: -93.71587869 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: CW NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Is the Sampled Areawithin a Wetland? Yes No X
Remarks:Hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology is present. Area meets wetland criteria. Antecedent precipitation is above the range ofnormal for the time of year.
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.Dominance Test worksheet:Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 25 x 1 = 25
FACW species 60 x 2 = 120
FAC species 15 x 3 = 45
FACU species 5 x 4 = 20
UPL species 5 x 5 = 25
Column Totals: 110 (A) 235 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.14
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%X
3 - Prevalence Index ≤3.0¹X
4 - Morphological Adaptations¹ (Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation¹ (Explain)
¹Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet ) %Cover Species? Status
1. Ulmus americana / American elm 30 Yes FACW
2. Acer negundo / Boxelder, Box elder 10 Yes FAC
3. Juniperus virginiana var. virginiana / Eastern redcedar 5 No UPL
4.
5.
45 = Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 feet )
1. Ulmus americana / American elm 30 Yes FACW
2.
3.
4.
5.
30 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 feet )
1. Symphyotrichum puniceum / Purple-stem american-aster 25 Yes OBL
2. Ribes cynosbati / Eastern prickly gooseberry 5 No FAC
3. Rubus idaeus / Common red raspberry 5 No FACU
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
35 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
1.
2.
0 = Total Cover
HydrophyticVegetationPresent? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point: 3-B
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type¹ Loc² Texture Remarks
0-10 10YR 2/1 100 Loam
10-16 10YR 6/1 95 10YR 3/6 5 M Sandy clay loamProminent redox conc.
¹Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ²Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils³:Histosol (A1) Sandy Gleyed Marix (S4) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7)
Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Other (Explain in Remarks)
2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ³Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present,
5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGYWetland Hydrology Indicators:Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Water (A1) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Water Marks (B1) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Gauge or Well Data (D9)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Project/Site: Carver County Parcel 080041400 City/County: San Francisco TWP, Carver County Sampling Date: 08/04/2020
Applicant/Owner: Sunde Engineering, PLLC State: MN Sampling Point: IA-A
Investigator(s): A. Yellick, D. Kruzel Section, Township, Range: S. 4, Twp. 114N, R. 24W
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Outwash - Slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): None
Slope(%): 4 Lat: 44.71189241 Long: -93.71466553 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Cordova-Webster complex (CW) NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Is the Sampled Areawithin a Wetland? Yes No X
Remarks:Area is within a vegetated agricultural drainage swale. Area does not meet wetland criteria. Antecedent precipitation is below normal for the time ofyear.
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.Dominance Test worksheet:Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
FACU species 38 x 4 = 152
UPL species 65 x 5 = 325
Column Totals: 103 (A) 477 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.63
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index ≤3.0¹
4 - Morphological Adaptations¹ (Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation¹ (Explain)X
¹Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet ) %Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 feet )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 feet )
1. Glycine max / Soybean 65 Yes UPL
2. Phleum pratense / Common timothy, Cultivated timothy 25 Yes FACU
3. Bromus inermis / Smooth brome, Smooth brome, Hungarian brome8 No FACU
4. Lotus corniculatus / Bird's foot trefoil, Bird's-foot trefoil 5 No FACU
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
103 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
1.
2.
0 = Total Cover
HydrophyticVegetationPresent? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Area is under soybean rotation. Hydrophytes may persist under normal circumstances.
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point: IA-A
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type¹ Loc² Texture Remarks
0-32 10YR 2/1 100 Loam Compacted
32-40 10YR 2/1 100 Loamy sand
¹Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ²Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils³:Histosol (A1) Sandy Gleyed Marix (S4) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7)
Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) X Other (Explain in Remarks)
2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ³Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present,
5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:The profile is thick and dark and exceeds sample methodology. Profile is assumed hydric based on the mapped hydric soil unit.
HYDROLOGYWetland Hydrology Indicators:Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Water (A1) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Water Marks (B1) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) X Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Gauge or Well Data (D9)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 30
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:Saturation observed at 30. Offsite Wetland Hydrology review Area A: 4 of 5 normal years showed wet signatures. Saturation Visible on Aerial Imageryindicator is met. Functional drain tile is in the area and geomorphic position is not met.
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Project/Site: Carver County Parcel 080041400 City/County: San Francisco TWP, Carver County Sampling Date: 08/04/2020
Applicant/Owner: Sunde Engineering, PLLC State: MN Sampling Point: IA-B
Investigator(s): A. Yellick, D. Kruzel Section, Township, Range: S. 4, Twp. 114N, R. 24W
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Outwash - TS Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Slope(%): 0 Lat: 44.7136548 Long: -93.71161885 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Cordova-Webster complex (CW) NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Is the Sampled Areawithin a Wetland? Yes No X
Remarks:Area is under soy bean rotation and normal circumstances are not present. The area does not meet wetland criteria. Antecedent precipitation is belownormal for the time of year.
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.Dominance Test worksheet:Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
UPL species 100 x 5 = 500
Column Totals: 100 (A) 500 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 5.0
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index ≤3.0¹
4 - Morphological Adaptations¹ (Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation¹ (Explain)X
¹Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet ) %Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 feet )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 feet )
1. Glycine max / Soybean 100 Yes UPL
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
100 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
1.
2.
0 = Total Cover
HydrophyticVegetationPresent? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Area is under soybean rotation. Hydrophytes may persist under normal circumstances.
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point: IA-B
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type¹ Loc² Texture Remarks
0-22 10YR 2/1 100 Loam
22-30 10YR 2/1 98 10YR 3/3 2 C M Loam Distinct redox concentration
30-40 10YR 2/1 100 Clay loam
¹Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ²Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils³:Histosol (A1) Sandy Gleyed Marix (S4) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7)
Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) X Other (Explain in Remarks)
2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ³Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present,
5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:Sampled profile is thick and dark and exceeds sample methodology. Profile is assumed hydric based on the mapped hydric soil unit.
HYDROLOGYWetland Hydrology Indicators:Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Water (A1) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Water Marks (B1) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) X Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Gauge or Well Data (D9)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:Offsite Wetland Hydrology review Area B: 4 of 5 normal years showed wet signatures. Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery indicator is met. Functioningdrain tile is in the area and geomorphic position is not met.
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Project/Site: Carver County Parcel 080041400 City/County: San Francisco TWP, Carver County Sampling Date: 08/04/2020
Applicant/Owner: Sunde Engineering, PLLC State: MN Sampling Point: IA-C
Investigator(s): A. Yellick, D. Kruzel Section, Township, Range: S. 4, Twp. 114N, R. 24W
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Outwash - TS Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope
Slope(%): 3 Lat: 44.71119757 Long: -93.70792416 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Rasset-Lester complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes (XB) NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Is the Sampled Areawithin a Wetland? Yes No X
Remarks:The area does not meet wetland criteria. Antecedent precipitation is below normal for the time of year.
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.Dominance Test worksheet:Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 3 x 1 = 3
FACW species 3 x 2 = 6
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
FACU species 110 x 4 = 440
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 116 (A) 449 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.87
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index ≤3.0¹
4 - Morphological Adaptations¹ (Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation¹ (Explain)
¹Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet ) %Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 feet )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 feet )
1. Phleum pratense / Common timothy, Cultivated timothy 75 Yes FACU
2. Bromus inermis / Smooth brome, Smooth brome, Hungarian brome25 Yes FACU
3. Trifolium pratense / Red clover 10 No FACU
4. Boltonia asteroides / White doll's daisy 3 No OBL
5. Verbena hastata / Swamp verbena 3 No FACW
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
116 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
1.
2.
0 = Total Cover
HydrophyticVegetationPresent? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point: IA-C
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type¹ Loc² Texture Remarks
0-24 10YR 2/1 98 10YR 3/4 2 C M Loam Distinct redox concentration
¹Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ²Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils³:Histosol (A1) Sandy Gleyed Marix (S4) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7)
Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Other (Explain in Remarks)
2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) X Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ³Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present,
5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGYWetland Hydrology Indicators:Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Water (A1) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Water Marks (B1) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Gauge or Well Data (D9)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:Offsite Wetland Hydrology review Area D: 2 of 5 normal years showed wet signatures. Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery indicator is met. A functionaldrainage system (swale) is present. Geomorphic position is not met.
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Project/Site: Carver County Parcel 080041400 City/County: San Francisco TWP, Carver County Sampling Date: 08/04/2020
Applicant/Owner: Sunde Engineering, PLLC State: MN Sampling Point: IA-D
Investigator(s): A. Yellick, D. Kruzel Section, Township, Range: S. 4, Twp. 114N, R. 24W
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Outwash - TS Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Slope(%): 0 Lat: 44.71056462 Long: -93.7098228 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Estherville-Hawick sandy loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded (HC2) NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Areawithin a Wetland? Yes No X
Remarks:Area is under soy bean rotation and normal circumstances are not present. Area does not meet wetland criteria. Antecedent precipitation is belownormal for the time of year.
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.Dominance Test worksheet:Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
UPL species 100 x 5 = 500
Column Totals: 100 (A) 500 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 5.0
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index ≤3.0¹
4 - Morphological Adaptations¹ (Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation¹ (Explain)X
¹Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet ) %Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 feet )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 feet )
1. Glycine max / Soybean 100 Yes UPL
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
100 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
1.
2.
0 = Total Cover
HydrophyticVegetationPresent? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Under soy bean rotation. Hydrophytes may persist under normal circumstances.
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point: IA-D
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type¹ Loc² Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 2/2 100 Loam
8-16 10YR 2/2 98 10YR 3/3 2 C M Loam Faint redox concentration
16-24 10YR 2/2 100 Loam
¹Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ²Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils³:Histosol (A1) Sandy Gleyed Marix (S4) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7)
Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Other (Explain in Remarks)
2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ³Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present,
5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGYWetland Hydrology Indicators:Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Water (A1) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Water Marks (B1) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) X Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) X Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Gauge or Well Data (D9)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:Offsite Wetland Hydrology review Area E: 3 of 5 normal years showed wet signatures. Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery indicator is met.
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Project/Site: Carver County Parcel 080041400 City/County: San Francisco TWO, Carver County Sampling Date: 10/30/2020
Applicant/Owner: Sunde Engineering, PLLC State: MN Sampling Point: IA-E
Investigator(s): A. Yellick, D. Kruzel Section, Township, Range: S. 4, Twp. 114N, R. 24W
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Outwash - TS Local relief (concave, convex, none): None
Slope(%): 0 Lat: 44.70940872 Long: -93.71014167 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: CW NWI classification: PEM1A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Is the Sampled Areawithin a Wetland? Yes No X
Remarks:Investigation area does not meet wetland criteria. Area is a not a wetland. Antecedent precipitation is above the range of normal for the time of year.
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.Dominance Test worksheet:Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 0 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 0.0
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index ≤3.0¹
4 - Morphological Adaptations¹ (Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation¹ (Explain)X
¹Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet ) %Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 feet )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 feet )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
0 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
1.
2.
0 = Total Cover
HydrophyticVegetationPresent? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Vegetation consisted of a chopped soybean field; assumed hydrophytic. Smooth brome and prickly ash was observed in vegetated portions outside ofthe cultivated area.
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point: IA-E
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type¹ Loc² Texture Remarks
0-43 10YR 2/1 100 Loam
43-45 7.5YR 3/2 100 Loam
¹Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ²Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils³:Histosol (A1) Sandy Gleyed Marix (S4) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7)
Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Other (Explain in Remarks)
2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ³Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present,
5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGYWetland Hydrology Indicators:Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Water (A1) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Water Marks (B1) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) X Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Gauge or Well Data (D9)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:Offsite wetland hydrology review Area A: 4 of 5 normal years showed wet signature. Saturation visible on aerial imagery indicator is met.
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Project/Site: Carver County Parcel 080041400 City/County: San Francisco TWO, Carver County Sampling Date: 10/30/2020
Applicant/Owner: Sunde Engineering, PLLC State: MN Sampling Point: IA-F
Investigator(s): A. Yellick, D. Kruzel Section, Township, Range: S. 4, Twp. 114N, R. 24W
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Outwash - TS Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Slope(%): 0 Lat: 44.71248301 Long: -93.71481189 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: GL NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Is the Sampled Areawithin a Wetland? Yes No X
Remarks:Wetland hydrology is not present. The area was determined to be upland.
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.Dominance Test worksheet:Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 0 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 0.0
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index ≤3.0¹
4 - Morphological Adaptations¹ (Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation¹ (Explain)X
¹Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet ) %Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 feet )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 feet )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
0 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
1.
2.
0 = Total Cover
HydrophyticVegetationPresent? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Recent soybean stubble; assumed hydrophytic.
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point: IA-F
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type¹ Loc² Texture Remarks
0-45 10YR 2/1 100
¹Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ²Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils³:Histosol (A1) Sandy Gleyed Marix (S4) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7)
Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) X Other (Explain in Remarks)
2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ³Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present,
5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:The soil profile was thick and dark. The profile is assumed hydric based on the mapped hydric soil unit and best professional judgment.
HYDROLOGYWetland Hydrology Indicators:Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Water (A1) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Water Marks (B1) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) X Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Gauge or Well Data (D9)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:Offsite wetland hydrology review area A: 4 of 5 normal years showed wet signatures. Saturation visible on aerial imagery indicator was wet. Functioningdrain tile is in the area and geomorphic position is not met.
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0
Appendix C SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Photo 1. Wetland 1 – Viewing North Photo 2. Wetland 2 – Viewing North
Photo 3. Investigation Area A – Viewing West Photo 4. Investigation Area B – Viewing West
Photo 5. Investigation Area C – Viewing North Photo 6. Investigation Area D – Viewing South
Photo 7. Wetland 3 – Viewing North Photo 8. Investigation Area E – Viewing South
Photo 9. Investigation Area F – Viewing South
Appendix D ANTECEDENT PRECIPITATION RECORD
Appendix D, Figure 1. Graph of recent precipitation in comparison with the normal range of precipitation in the general site location. Daily precipitation data is plotted independently and as a 30-day rolling total up to the date of the site visit. The normal range is plotted from precipitation data recorded from 1981 to 2010. The normal range is represented in this graph with two lines, the 30th percentile and the 70th percentile of the period-of-record data distribution.
Source: http://climate.umn.edu/
Appendix D, Figure 2. Minnesota State Climatology Office map depicting total precipitation for the week of the site visit.
Source: https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/weekmap/weekmap.html
Appendix E OFF-SITE AGRICULTURE REVIEW
!(A
!(B
!(C
!(D
!(E
!(F
LegendProject ParcelCarver Co. ParcelsOffsite Investigation Areas
SOURCE: MnDNR, USDA, ESRI, TIGER, Bing, Carver Co., Anderson Engineering
Project Location
San Francisco TownshipCarver County, MN13605 1st Ave N #100, Plymouth, MN 55441
P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com
Olson PropertyCarver County, MN
Offsite Hydrology ReviewInvestigation Areas
PID: 080041400Project No: 16087Date: 10.15.2020
I1 inch = 400 feet0 400 800200
Feet
2019 Carver Co. Imagery
Wetland Hydrology from Aerial Imagery - Recording Form
Project: Olson Property Date: 10/15/2020 County: Carver
Comm #: 16087 Legal: S. 4 Twp.114N R.24W 44.714004, -93.710125
Area A Area B Area C Area D Area E Area F Area G Area H
2019 Carver Co. Wet WS WS WS WS WS SS
2017 Carver Co. Normal NV NV WS NV SS NV
2016 Carver Co. Wet NV NV WS NV NV NV
2015 FSA Normal WS WS WS NV NV NV
2014 Carver Co. Wet WS WS WS WS WS SS
2013 Carver Co. Normal WS WS WS WS WS NV
2011 Carver Co. Normal WS WS WS SS NV NV
2010 FSA Wet WS NV WS WS NV NV
2009 FSA Normal WS WS WS NV WS SS
2008 Carver Co. Dry WS WS WS WS WS SS
2005 Carver Co. Wet WS WS WS NV NV SS
2003 FSA Dry CS NV WS NV NV NV
2002 Carver Co. Wet WS WS WS NV NV NV
2000 MnGEO Dry NV NV WS WS NV NV
Number of Normal 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Number with wet signatures 4 4 5 2 3 1Percent with wet Signatures 80% 80% 100% 40% 60% 20% 0% 0%
Acronyms:
WS-wetland signature SS-soil wetness signature CS-crop stress
NC-not cropped AP-altered pattern NV-nomal vegetatic cover
DO - drowned out SW-standing water NSS-no soil wetness signature
Image DateClimate Condition
(wet, dry, normal)Image Source
Image Interpretation
Anderson Engineering of MN, LLC Page 1 of 1
Wetland Hydrology from Aerial Imagery - Recording Form
Project: Olson Property Date: 10/15/2020 County: Carver
Comm #: 16087 Legal: S. 4 Twp.114N R.24W 44.714004, -93.710125
Decision Matrix.
YES Yes >50%
YES Yes 30-50%
YES Yes <30%
YES No >50%
YES No 30-50%
YES No <30%
No Yes >50%
No Yes 30-50%
No Yes <30%
No No >50%
No No 30-50%
No No <30%
TABLE 1.
Area
Hydric
Soils
Present
NWI Mapped
Percent
with wet
signtures
from Exhibit
1
A YES NO 80.00%
B YES NO 80.00%
C YES YES 100.00%
D YES YES 40.00%
E NO YES 60.00%
F NO YES 20.00%
G
H1 Answer N/A if field verification is not required and was not conducted
Yes if other hydrology indicators present
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes if other hydrology indicators present
Yes
Yes if other hydrology indicators present
Yes
Yes if other hydrology indicators present
Field Verification RequiredHydric Soils
Present
NWI
Mapped
Percent with wet
signatures from
Exhibit 1
Wetland ?
Yes
No
Wetland?
No
No
Yes
No
No
Other Hydrolgy
Indicators Present 1
No Hydrology Present
No Hydrology Present
No Hydrology Present
No Hydrology Present
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Wetland Hydrology from Aerial Imagery - Recording Form
Project: Olson Property Date: 10/15/2020 County: Carver
Comm #: 16087 Legal: S. 4 Twp.114N R.24W 44.714004, -93.710125
Precipitation Data
Year Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct ANN
2019 2.90 6.02 3.43 5.31 5.92 4.94 3.58 40.14
2018 1.96 3.92 6.28 3.83 1.49 6.24 2.82 32.90
2017 3.53 5.79 3.54 3.44 5.24 1.61 4.87 30.48
2016 2.61 2.57 3.16 4.37 8.17 4.98 3.31 34.93
2015 1.97 4.32 4.32 5.66 2.61 2.71 2.72 31.69
2014 7.27 5.74 13.19 2.90 3.00 1.90 1.25 40.13
2013 5.11 5.10 5.71 3.61 1.42 1.58 2.81 30.68
2012 2.45 11.14 7.01 3.00 2.75 0.56 1.60 34.04
2011 2.83 4.07 4.16 7.12 1.85 0.49 0.89 26.73
2010 3.36 2.78 6.54 3.52 6.43 5.79 1.58 37.83
2009 1.56 0.91 2.86 1.47 8.07 1.20 5.94 28.73
2008 2.99 2.97 3.59 3.61 3.21 2.23 1.46 25.49
2007 1.13 2.47 1.48 2.02 7.11 3.58 4.51 29.52
2006 3.77 2.02 4.26 1.32 5.45 4.16 0.46 27.35
2005 2.83 3.67 5.32 1.45 2.94 6.37 3.88 32.14
2004 2.39 7.65 4.65 4.60 1.79 5.08 1.61 32.25
2003 2.28 4.43 2.86 2.55 0.91 2.64 0.62 20.00
2002 2.27 3.21 7.14 4.68 10.70 3.22 3.37 36.70
2001 6.14 4.30 3.60 1.46 1.94 2.64 0.67 27.78
2000 0.90 3.98 3.78 3.19 3.66 0.59 0.96 24.53
color key:
total is in lowest 30th percentile of the period-of-record distribution
total is => 30th and <= 70th percentile
total is in highest 30th percentile of the period-of-record distribution
Normal
Precipitation
Condition
Wet
Wet
Normal
Wet
Normal
Wet
Normal
Wet
Normal
Wet
Wet
Normal
Dry
Dry
Normal
Normal
Wet
Wet
Dry
Appendix F CREDENTIALS
LegendProject ParcelCarver Co. Parcels
SOURCE: MnDNR, USDA, ESRI, TIGER, Bing, Carver Co., Anderson Engineering
Project Location
San Francisco TownshipCarver County, MN13605 1st Ave N #100, Plymouth, MN 55441
P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com
Olson PropertyCarver County, MN
2000 MnGEO ImageryDry Precipitation Condition
PID: 080041400Project No: 16087Date: 10.15.2020
I1 inch = 400 feet0 400 800200
Feet
LegendProject ParcelCarver Co. Parcels
SOURCE: MnDNR, USDA, ESRI, TIGER, Bing, Carver Co., Anderson Engineering
Project Location
San Francisco TownshipCarver County, MN13605 1st Ave N #100, Plymouth, MN 55441
P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com
Olson PropertyCarver County, MN
2002 Carver Co. ImageryWet Precipitation Condition
PID: 080041400Project No: 16087Date: 7.31.2020
I1 inch = 395.87 feet0 400 800200
Feet
LegendProject ParcelCarver Co. Parcels
SOURCE: MnDNR, USDA, ESRI, TIGER, Bing, Carver Co., Anderson Engineering
Project Location
San Francisco TownshipCarver County, MN13605 1st Ave N #100, Plymouth, MN 55441
P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com
Olson PropertyCarver County, MN
2003 FSA ImageryDry Precipitation Condition
PID: 080041400Project No: 16087Date: 10.15.2020
I1 inch = 400 feet0 400 800200
Feet
LegendProject ParcelCarver Co. Parcels
SOURCE: MnDNR, USDA, ESRI, TIGER, Bing, Carver Co., Anderson Engineering
Project Location
San Francisco TownshipCarver County, MN13605 1st Ave N #100, Plymouth, MN 55441
P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com
Olson PropertyCarver County, MN
2005 Carver Co. ImageryWet Precipitation Condition
PID: 080041400Project No: 16087Date: 10.15.2020
I1 inch = 400 feet0 400 800200
Feet
LegendProject ParcelCarver Co. Parcels
SOURCE: MnDNR, USDA, ESRI, TIGER, Bing, Carver Co., Anderson Engineering
Project Location
San Francisco TownshipCarver County, MN13605 1st Ave N #100, Plymouth, MN 55441
P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com
Olson PropertyCarver County, MN
2008 Carver Co. ImageryDry Precipitation Condition
PID: 080041400Project No: 16087Date: 10.15.2020
I1 inch = 400 feet0 400 800200
Feet
LegendProject ParcelCarver Co. Parcels
SOURCE: MnDNR, USDA, ESRI, TIGER, Bing, Carver Co., Anderson Engineering
Project Location
San Francisco TownshipCarver County, MN13605 1st Ave N #100, Plymouth, MN 55441
P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com
Olson PropertyCarver County, MN
2009 FSA ImageryNormal Precipitation Condition
PID: 080041400Project No: 16087Date: 10.15.2020
I1 inch = 400 feet0 400 800200
Feet
LegendProject ParcelCarver Co. Parcels
SOURCE: MnDNR, USDA, ESRI, TIGER, Bing, Carver Co., Anderson Engineering
Project Location
San Francisco TownshipCarver County, MN13605 1st Ave N #100, Plymouth, MN 55441
P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com
Olson PropertyCarver County, MN
2010 FSA ImageryWet Precipitation Condition
PID: 080041400Project No: 16087Date: 10.15.2020
I1 inch = 400 feet0 400 800200
Feet
LegendProject ParcelCarver Co. Parcels
SOURCE: MnDNR, USDA, ESRI, TIGER, Bing, Carver Co., Anderson Engineering
Project Location
San Francisco TownshipCarver County, MN13605 1st Ave N #100, Plymouth, MN 55441
P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com
Olson PropertyCarver County, MN
2011 Carver Co. ImageryNormal Precipitation Condition
PID: 080041400Project No: 16087Date: 10.15.2020
I1 inch = 400 feet0 400 800200
Feet
LegendProject ParcelCarver Co. Parcels
SOURCE: MnDNR, USDA, ESRI, TIGER, Bing, Carver Co., Anderson Engineering
Project Location
San Francisco TownshipCarver County, MN13605 1st Ave N #100, Plymouth, MN 55441
P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com
Olson PropertyCarver County, MN
2013 Carver Co. ImageryNormal Precipitation Condition
PID: 080041400Project No: 16087Date: 10.15.2020
I1 inch = 400 feet0 400 800200
Feet
LegendProject ParcelCarver Co. Parcels
SOURCE: MnDNR, USDA, ESRI, TIGER, Bing, Carver Co., Anderson Engineering
Project Location
San Francisco TownshipCarver County, MN13605 1st Ave N #100, Plymouth, MN 55441
P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com
Olson PropertyCarver County, MN
2014 Carver Co. ImageryWet Precipitation Condition
PID: 080041400Project No: 16087Date: 10.15.2020
I1 inch = 400 feet0 400 800200
Feet
LegendProject ParcelCarver Co. Parcels
SOURCE: MnDNR, USDA, ESRI, TIGER, Bing, Carver Co., Anderson Engineering
Project Location
San Francisco TownshipCarver County, MN13605 1st Ave N #100, Plymouth, MN 55441
P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com
Olson PropertyCarver County, MN
2015 FSA ImageryNormal Precipitation Condition
PID: 080041400Project No: 16087Date: 10.15.2020
I1 inch = 400 feet0 400 800200
Feet
LegendProject ParcelCarver Co. Parcels
SOURCE: MnDNR, USDA, ESRI, TIGER, Bing, Carver Co., Anderson Engineering
Project Location
San Francisco TownshipCarver County, MN13605 1st Ave N #100, Plymouth, MN 55441
P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com
Olson PropertyCarver County, MN
2016 Carver Co. ImageryWet Precipitation Condition
PID: 080041400Project No: 16087Date: 10.15.2020
I1 inch = 400 feet0 400 800200
Feet
LegendProject ParcelCarver Co. Parcels
SOURCE: MnDNR, USDA, ESRI, TIGER, Bing, Carver Co., Anderson Engineering
Project Location
San Francisco TownshipCarver County, MN13605 1st Ave N #100, Plymouth, MN 55441
P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com
Olson PropertyCarver County, MN
2017 Carver Co. ImageryNormal Precipitation Condition
PID: 080041400Project No: 16087Date: 10.15.2020
I1 inch = 400 feet0 400 800200
Feet
LegendProject ParcelCarver Co. Parcels
SOURCE: MnDNR, USDA, ESRI, TIGER, Bing, Carver Co., Anderson Engineering
Project Location
San Francisco TownshipCarver County, MN13605 1st Ave N #100, Plymouth, MN 55441
P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com
Olson PropertyCarver County, MN
2019 Carver Co. ImageryWet Precipitation Condition
PID: 080041400Project No: 16087Date: 10.15.2020
I1 inch = 400 feet0 400 800200
Feet
Benjamin Hodapp, PWS Environmental Specialist
13605 1st Avenue North Suite 100, Plymouth, MN 55441 P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com
CERTIFICATIONS Professional Wetland Scientist #1832 MN Certified Wetland Delineator #1016
EDUCATION MS Water Resources Management University of Wisconsin-Madison BS Biology; Ecology Minnesota State University- Mankato
SPECIALIZED TRAINING Wetland Delineation & Management Training Richard Chinn Environmental Training, Inc. Wetland Plant Identification Biotic Consultants Inc. Plant Identification for Wetland Delineation University of Wisconsin-La Crosse Watershed Academy Web Certificate United States Environmental Protection Agency
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS Society of Wetland Scientists MN Wetland Professionals Association (WPA) MN WPA President 2010 Wisconsin Wetlands Association Association of State Wetland Managers Minnesota Native Plant Society Ecological Society of America
TOTAL EXPERIENCE 19 years
YEARS WITH CURRENT FIRM 2004 to Present
PUBLICATIONS & PRESENTATIONS The Future of Rowan Creek Watershed: Connecting Land Use and Management with Water Quality. 2003. Water Resources Management Workshop 2002, Gaylord Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison. The Tumultuous World of Drainage Districts: An Analysis of Existing Management Arrangements, with Recommendations. Working Paper Series 2002-1. Water Resources Institutions and Policies, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Wisconsin, Madison. South Shore Lake Bemidji Remediation & Restoration, Society of American Military Engineers meeting June 22, 2016, St Paul, MN.
SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE Benjamin Hodapp, an Environmental Specialist and Senior Project Manager, brings a broad background of knowledge and experience in the environmental field to the Anderson Engineering team. Benjamin has a unique combination of multi-disciplinary academic training and work experience at various levels of federal, state and local government and private consulting. Benjamin’s project experience includes natural resource inventory and assessment; wetland delineation, mitigation design and monitoring; regulatory permitting; agency and stakeholder coordination; environmental impact assessment, environmental document preparation and public outreach.
REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS Southwest Light Rail Transit- Metropolitan Council – Minneapolis, MN: Project manager for wetland delineation and permitting efforts in support of multi-disciplinary consultant team for preparation of Final Environmental Impact Statement for proposed 16 mile light rail alignment. Project tasks included completion of wetland delineations, preparation of all federal, state and local wetland permits and wetland mitigation plans, quality assurance and quality control of all deliverable products.
Harriet Island to South St. Paul Regional Trail – City of St Paul, City of South St. Paul and Dakota County – St Paul, MN: Project manager for wetland delineation, mapping and assessment efforts in support of multi-disciplinary consultant team responsible for preliminary engineering and final design. Project tasks included project management oversight and coordination, supervising field staff in completion of both off-site and on-site wetland determinations, boundary delineations, GPS mapping and functional assessments. Oversaw preparation of and responsible for quality assurance and quality control of all deliverable products.
Crosstown Blvd. Pedestrian Trail – City of Andover – Andover, MN: Project Manager for wetland delineation associated with proposed City trail improvements. Services included a wetland delineation, GPS mapping and functional assessment document findings and coordination and approval of findings with federal, state and local regulatory agencies.
Bennett Family Park Improvements – Minnetonka, MN: Project Manager for wetland delineation associated with proposed baseball complex improvements. Services included a wetland delineation, GPS mapping and functional assessment document findings and coordination and approval of findings with federal, state and local regulatory agencies.
Section 401/404 Wetland Permitting – Fort McCoy Commemorative Park Expansion – Fort McCoy, WI: Provided project management services for Section 401/404 permitting associated with proposed wetland impacts resulting from the Commemorative Park Expansion Project at the Fort McCoy U.S. Army installation. Project tasks included project management, developing a wetland mitigation strategy in compliance with Section 401/404 and state wetland permitting requirements and oversight and quality control in preparing Section 401/404 permit application.
Alex Yellick Environmental Associate
EDUCATION MS Environmental & Conservation Sciences North Dakota State University BS Biological Sciences North Dakota State University CERTIFICATIONS MN Certified Wetland Delineator #1354 MnDNR Tree Inspector #201005102 Erosion and Stormwater Management Construction Site Management HAZWOPER 40-hour Training TOTAL EXPERIENCE 5 years YEARS WITH CURRENT FIRM 2018 to present
SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE Alex Yellick, an Environmental Associate, brings a broad range of knowledge and experience in the environmental field to the Anderson Engineering team. Prior to his employment with Anderson Engineering of MN, LLC, Alex worked as a certified wetland delineator and has background in biologic assessments, regulatory review/permitting and Phase I Environmental Site Assessments. The skills that Alex developed through his educational background and experience make him proficient in assessing and addressing a range of environmental issues, and clearly communicating solutions to clients and various regulatory agencies.
Alex’s project experience includes biological assessments of urban and rural wetlands, environmental compliance oversight, stormwater best management practices design and compliance, and Phase I site assessments. Alex has experience with Global Positioning Systems, Geographic Information Systems, and AutoCAD.
REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS Wetland Delineation/Assessment – Various Locations: services included wetland delineation and assessment of permitting requirements in support of linear construction projects and real-estate transactions. Project tasks included completion of wetland field delineations following the 1987 United States Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Manual and Midwest Regional Supplement, boundary delineations, GPS mapping, and preparation of reports to document findings and assess wetland impacts.
Permitting and Compliance Activities – Minnesota, Arkansas, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Texas: Services included environmental permitting and operational compliance assistance associated with linear project construction and maintenance activities. Project tasks included assessment of proposed project environmental impacts to Federal and State regulated waters, floodplains, threatened and endangered species, historic properties, air quality, and local jurisdictional requirements, and preparation of permit applications and associated materials.
Stormwater Permitting and Compliance Activities – Greater Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Area: Provided National Pollution Discharge Elimination System permitting and compliance support to linear construction project activities. Project tasks consisted of evaluating project workspaces for appropriate stormwater best management practices, preparation of stormwater plans/permits, permit compliance inspections and post-construction restoration inspections, and preparation of reports to document inspection findings.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment – Various Locations: Prepared Phase I Environmental Site Assessments of residential, commercial, industrial, and vacant properties in accordance with ASTM E1527-13. Project tasks generally included environmental desktop review, regulatory file review, site inspections, interviews, and preparation of reports to document findings.
Dylan Kruzel Environmental Associate
13605 1st Avenue North Suite 100, Plymouth, MN 55441 P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com
EDUCATION Bachelor of Science: Wildlife Biology Minor: Wetlands Ecology and Biology Bemidji State University – Bemidji SPECIALIZED TRAINING
S-130 Basic Wildland Firefighter
S-190 Introduction to Fire Behavior
L-180 Human Factors in the Wildland Fire Service
Certified Open Water Diver
OSHA 10 Hour Training
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS MN Wetland Professionals Association (WPA)
The Wildlife Society (TWS)
TOTAL EXPERIENCE 1.5 years YEARS WITH CURRENT FIRM 2020 to present
SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE Dylan Kruzel, an Environmental Associate, brings a broad background of knowledge and experience in the environmental field to the Anderson Engineering team. Prior to his employment with Anderson Engineering of MN, LLC, Dylan worked for the Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) of Becker County as a Conservation Technician. He conducted field evaluations for conservation plans, monitored conservation easements, and provided available natural resource program information to landowners with conservation concerns. He has also assisted in the design and installation of various native habitat, shoreline restoration, rain garden, and storm water mitigation projects. The skills that Dylan has developed through his educational background and experience make him proficient in assessing and addressing a range of ecological indications and environmental issues.
Dylan’s project and educational experience includes conservation management practices, habitat management evaluations, species identification, wetland delineation and classifications. Dylan has experience with Collector for ArcGIS, Geographic Information Systems, Global Positioning Systems, and Realtime Landscape Architect.
REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS Land Alterations and Field Monitoring – Becker County SWCD – MN: Services include performing the following general activities in compliance with federal, state, and local regulations: assisting in site evaluations and installing for various cost share projects like conservation easements, management practices, and shoreland alterations. Wetland Delineation/Reporting – Various Locations: Services included wetland delineation and reporting in support of linear construction projects and real-estate transactions for federal, state, and local agencies, as well as private companies. Project tasks included completion of wetland field delineations following the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region, and Northcentral and Northeast Region, GPS mapping, and preparation of reports to document findings and assess wetland impacts. NEPA Documentation – MN: Services include preparation of Categorical Exclusion Determination documents in accordance with the Minnesota Department of Transportation Highway Project Development Process. Project tasks include evaluation, coordination, and responding to assist private and state project managers in environmental documentation for Minnesota highways.
Attachment 3
Area Well logs
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031122148
County Carver Entry Date 05/26/1988
Quad Jordan Update Date 02/14/2014
Quad ID 90B Received Date
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedPOPPITZ, 115 24 W 33 DDCCCC 203 ft. 203 ft. 09/17/1984
Elevation 849 ft. Elev. Method CALC FROM 2-FOOT COUNTY DEM Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? Yes
No
From To
ThreadedCasing Type Single casing
No
Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
Well 7425 50 CR MN
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
SAND 0 9 SOFTBROWN
CLAY 9 28 SOFTYEL/BRN
CLAY 28 94 SOFTBLU/GRY
SAND 94 116 SOFTBROWN
CLAY 116 174 SOFTGRAY
SAND (FINE) 174 178 SOFTBROWN
SAND & CLAY 178 194 SOFTGRAY
SAND 194 203 SOFTBROWN
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 198in. To ft. lbs./ft.
stainlessScreen? Make JOHNSONX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set2 10in. ft.5 ft.ft.
Open Hole From ft. To ft.
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
WEST OF EAST UNION.
Material FromAmount Tobentonite ft. ft.
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report122148
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/11/2020
YESPitless adapter manufacturer Model
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above grade
PIONEER
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.110 Measureland surface 09/17/1984
ft. hrs. Pumping at 35 g.p.m.
feet Direction TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
0.75 220
10144 Submersible
Yes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well Co. 10125 SCHMIEG, K.
Remarks
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
sand-brownMinnesota Geological Survey
Quat. buried
Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters orSystem X Y443814 4951831
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 05/21/2007Tax Records
Angled Drill Hole
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031129153
County Carver Entry Date 05/26/1988
Quad Jordan Update Date 08/18/2014
Quad ID 90B Received Date
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedZABACK, 114 24 W 4 BADADC 415 ft. 415 ft. 05/20/1976
Elevation 900 ft. Elev. Method 7.5 minute topographic map (+/- 5 feet) Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? Yes
No
From To
Threaded1 ft.
Casing Type Single casing
No
X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
CLAY 0 15 MEDIUMBROWN
CLAY 15 93 MEDIUMGRAY
GRAVEL 93 114 MEDIUMBROWN
CLAY 114 296 MEDIUMGRAY
CLAY & GRAVEL 296 318 MEDIUMGRAY
SHALE 318 335 MEDIUMWHT/GRY
CLAY 335 340 MEDIUMGRAY
LIMEROCK 340 353 MEDIUMRED
GREEN SHALE-RED 353 372 MEDIUMGRN/RED
SANDSTONE-SHALE 372 415 MED-HRDWHITE
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 344in. To ft. lbs./ft.
Screen? MakeType344Open Hole From ft. To ft.415
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report129153
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/09/2020
Pitless adapter manufacturer Model
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above gradeX
A. Y. MCDONALD
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.171 Measureland surface 05/20/1976
ft.172 hrs.5 Pumping at 10 g.p.m.
55 feet Southeas Direction Septic tank/drain field TypeWell disinfected upon completion? Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
05/20/1976
1607563 0.75 230
10189 Submersible
Yes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerBohn Well Co. 70350 BOHN, G.
Remarks
Tunnel CIty/Lone Rock Fm
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
Wonewoc SandstoneMinnesota Geological Survey
Tunnel City-340
Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters orSystem X Y443360 4951523
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 10/17/1994Information from
Angled Drill Hole
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031130764
County Carver Entry Date 05/26/1988
Quad Jordan Update Date 02/14/2014
Quad ID 90B Received Date
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedREHWINKLE, 114 24 W 4 BABBAB 269 ft. 269 ft. 01/25/1977
Elevation 916 ft. Elev. Method CALC FROM 2-FOOT COUNTY DEM Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? Yes
No
From To
ThreadedCasing Type Single casing
No
X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
Contact 7625 50 CR COLOGNE MN
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
CLAY 0 18 SOFTBROWN
CLAY 18 63 SOFTBLUE
CLAY & SAND 63 130 SOFTGRAY
CLAY (BRICK) 130 242 SOFTGRAY
SAND & CLAY 242 258 SOFTGRAY
SAND WATER 258 269 SOFTGRAY
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 264 11in. To ft. lbs./ft.
stainlessScreen? Make JOHNSONX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set2 15in. ft.2645 269 ft.ft.
Open Hole From ft. To ft.
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
COLOGNE.
Material FromAmount Tobentonite ft. ft.
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report130764
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/11/2020
YESPitless adapter manufacturer Model
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above grade
STA-RITE
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.175 Measureland surface 01/25/1977
60 feet North Direction Septic tank/drain field TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
01/20/1977
1 230
10198 Submersible
Yes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well Co. 10125 LEUTHNER, R.
Remarks
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
sand-grayMinnesota Geological Survey
Quat. buried
Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters orSystem X Y443064 4951796
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 05/24/2007Tax Records
Angled Drill Hole
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031151465
County Carver Entry Date 09/19/1989
Quad Jordan Update Date 08/18/2014
Quad ID 90B Received Date
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedPETERSON, 114 24 W 4 BADCB 400 ft. 400 ft. 10/26/1978
Elevation 909 ft. Elev. Method 7.5 minute topographic map (+/- 5 feet) Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? Yes
No
From To
Threaded1 ft.
Casing Type Single casing
No
X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
C/W COLOGNE MN 55322
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
YELLOW CLAY 0 23 SOFTBROWN
BLUE CLAY 23 65 SOFTGRAY
SAND & CLAY 65 84 SOFTGRAY
CLAY 84 118 SOFTGRAY
CLAY & SAND 118 184 SOFTGRAY
CLAY (BRICK) 184 317 SOFTGRAY
SAND & CLAY 317 324 SOFTGRAY
CLAY & SAND 324 356 SOFTGRAY
SHALE 356 385 SOFTGREEN
SANDSTONE 385 397 HARDWHITE
SHALE 397 400 SOFTGREEN
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 358in. To ft. lbs./ft.
Screen? MakeType358Open Hole From ft. To ft.400
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
Material FromAmount Tobentonite ft.0 ft.0
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report151465
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/11/2020
Pitless adapter manufacturer Model
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above grade
FLINT & WALLING
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.170 Measureland surface 10/26/1978
ft. hrs.2 Pumping at 50 g.p.m.
feet Direction TypeWell disinfected upon completion? Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
12/05/1978
0.75 230
12190 Submersible
Yes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well Co. 10125 LEUTHNER, M.
Remarks
Tunnel CIty/Lone Rock Fm
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
Wonewoc SandstoneMinnesota Geological Survey
Tunnel City-356
Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters orSystem X Y443273 4951525
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 02/28/2002Information from
Angled Drill Hole
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031159043
County Carver Entry Date 09/19/1989
Quad Jordan Update Date 02/14/2014
Quad ID 90B Received Date
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedHAAS, AL 115 24 W 33 DDADD 154 ft. 154 ft. 09/11/1979
Elevation 865 ft. Elev. Method 7.5 minute topographic map (+/- 5 feet) Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? Yes
No
From To
Threaded1 ft.
Casing Type Single casing
No
X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
C/W CARVER MN 55315
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
DIRT 0 8 SOFTBLACK
CLAY & SAND 8 26 SOFTGRAY
CLAY 26 74 SOFTGRAY
SAND & CLAY 74 112 SOFTGRAY
SAND 112 116 SOFTBROWN
SAND (MUDDY) 116 128 SOFTBROWN
SAND 128 132 SOFTBROWN
SAND (MUDDY) 132 138 SOFTBROWN
SAND 138 141 SOFTBROWN
CLAY & SAND 141 144 SOFTGRAY
SAND 144 154 SOFTBROWN
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 149in. To ft. lbs./ft.
stainlessScreen? Make JOHNSONX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set2 10in. ft.1495 154 ft.ft.
Open Hole From ft. To ft.
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
Material FromAmount Tobentonite ft.0 ft.0
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report159043
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/11/2020
Pitless adapter manufacturer Model
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above grade
FLINT & WALLING
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.80 Measureland surface 09/11/1979
ft. hrs.2 Pumping at 30 g.p.m.
feet Direction TypeWell disinfected upon completion? Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
09/15/1979
0.75 230
10108 Submersible
Yes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well Co. 10125 LEUTHNER, R.
Remarks
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
sand-brownMinnesota Geological Survey
Quat. buried
Digitized - scale 1:24,000 or larger (Digitizing Table)System X Y444184 4952048
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 03/10/1995Name on mailbox
Angled Drill Hole
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031168962
County Carver Entry Date 09/19/1989
Quad Jordan Update Date 03/17/2014
Quad ID 90B Received Date
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedSECK, ROLAND 114 24 W 4 ABBBC 240 ft. 240 ft. 12/04/1980
Elevation 895 ft. Elev. Method 7.5 minute topographic map (+/- 5 feet) Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? Yes
No
From To
Threaded0 ft.
Casing Type Single casing
No
X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
YELLOW CLAY 0 21 SOFTBROWN
BLUE CLAY 21 38 SOFTGRAY
SAND & CLAY 38 116 SOFTGRAY
CLAY & SAND 116 168 SOFTGRAY
BRICK CLAY 168 212 SOFTGRAY
CLAY 212 233 SOFTGRAY
SAND 233 240 SOFTGRAY
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 235in. To ft. lbs./ft.
stainlessScreen? Make JOHNSONX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set2 15in. ft.2355 240 ft.ft.
Open Hole From ft. To ft.
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
EAST UNION UNINCORPORTATED COMMUNITY
Material FromAmount Tobentonite ft.0 ft.0
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report168962
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/11/2020
Pitless adapter manufacturer Model
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above grade
AERMOTOR
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.160 Measureland surface 12/04/1980
ft.0 hrs. Pumping at 35 g.p.m.
feet Direction TypeWell disinfected upon completion? Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
00/00/1980
1 220
15189 Submersible
Yes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well Co. 10125 SCHMIEG, K.
Remarks
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
sand-grayMinnesota Geological Survey
Quat. buried
Digitized - scale 1:24,000 or larger (Digitizing Table)System X Y443452 4951738
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 03/10/1995Name on mailbox
Angled Drill Hole
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031168964
County Carver Entry Date 05/26/1988
Quad Jordan Update Date 02/14/2014
Quad ID 90B Received Date
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedHASS, AL 115 24 W 33 DDCCAC 174 ft. 174 ft. 10/07/1980
Elevation 811 ft. Elev. Method CALC FROM 2-FOOT COUNTY DEM Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? Yes
No
From To
ThreadedCasing Type Single casing
No
X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
Well 7335 50 CR MN
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
CLAY 0 9 SOFTYEL/BRN
SAND 9 34 SOFTBROWN
CLAY 34 83 SOFTGRAY
SAND & CLAY 83 94 SOFTGRAY
CLAY 94 133 SOFTGRAY
SAND & CLAY 133 139 SOFTGRAY
SAND (FINE) 139 163 SOFTBROWN
SAND 163 174 SOFTBROWN
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 169in. To ft. lbs./ft.
stainlessScreen? Make JOHNSONX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set2 10in. ft.5 ft.ft.
Open Hole From ft. To ft.
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
W.OF EAST UNION.
Material FromAmount Tobentonite ft. ft.
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report168964
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/11/2020
YESPitless adapter manufacturer Model
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above grade
FLINT & WALLING
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.70 Measureland surface 10/08/1980
ft. hrs. Pumping at 35 g.p.m.
feet Direction TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
0.75 220
10105 Submersible
Yes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well Co. 10125 LEUTHNER, M.
Remarks
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
sand-brownMinnesota Geological Survey
Quat. buried
Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters orSystem X Y443861 4951892
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 05/21/2007Tax Records
Angled Drill Hole
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031189578
County Carver Entry Date 05/26/1988
Quad Jordan Update Date 08/18/2014
Quad ID 90B Received Date
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedEDBLOM, MS. 114 24 W 4 BDACBC 380 ft. 380 ft. 02/22/1982
Elevation 894 ft. Elev. Method 7.5 minute topographic map (+/- 5 feet) Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? Yes
No
From To
Threaded0 ft.
Casing Type Single casing
No
X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
C/W CARVER MN
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
YELLOW CLAY 0 24 SOFTBROWN
BLUE CLAY 24 66 SOFTGRAY
SAND & CLAY 66 128 SOFTBROWN
CLAY 128 173 SOFTGRAY
SAND & CLAY 173 231 SOFTGRAY
CLAY 231 250 SOFTGRAY
SAND & CLAY 250 257 SOFTGRAY
CLAY 257 351 HARDGRAY
SHALE 351 357 SOFTGREEN
SANDSTONE 357 380 HARDWHITE
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 355in. To ft. lbs./ft.
Screen? MakeType355Open Hole From ft. To ft.380
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
NO ADDRESS LISTED.
Material FromAmount Tobentonite ft.0 ft.0
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report189578
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/09/2020
Pitless adapter manufacturer Model
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above grade
A.Y. MCDONALD
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.155 Measureland surface 02/22/1982
ft.0 hrs. Pumping at 30 g.p.m.
feet Direction TypeWell disinfected upon completion? Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
00/00/1982
1 220
15180 Submersible
Yes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well Co. 10125 SCHMIEG, K.
Remarks
Tunnel CIty/Lone Rock Fm
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
Wonewoc SandstoneMinnesota Geological Survey
Tunnel City-351
Digitized - scale 1:24,000 or larger (Digitizing Table)System X Y443192 4951275
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 03/10/1995Name on mailbox
Angled Drill Hole
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031189579
County Carver Entry Date 05/26/1988
Quad Jordan Update Date 02/14/2014
Quad ID 90B Received Date
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedVIERU, EERO 114 24 W 4 ABCDAC 256 ft. 256 ft. 03/26/1982
Elevation 889 ft. Elev. Method CALC FROM 2-FOOT COUNTY DEM Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? Yes
No
From To
ThreadedCasing Type Single casing
No
Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
Well 7510 159TH ST SW
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
YELLOW CLAY 0 21 SOFTBROWN
SAND & CLAY 21 43 SOFTBROWN
CLAY 43 57 SOFTBLU/GRY
SAND & GRAVEL 57 93 SOFTBROWN
CLAY & SAND 93 184 SOFTGRAY
CLAY 184 197 SOFTGRAY
CLAY & SAND 197 215 SOFTGRAY
CLAY (STICKY) 215 246 HARDGRAY
SAND 246 256 SOFTGRAY
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 251in. To ft. lbs./ft.
stainlessScreen? Make JOHNSONX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set2 15in. ft.5 ft.ft.
Open Hole From ft. To ft.
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
EAST UNION.
Material FromAmount Tobentonite ft. ft.
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report189579
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/11/2020
YESPitless adapter manufacturer Model
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above grade
FLINTS & WALLING
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.145 Measureland surface 03/27/1982
ft. hrs. Pumping at 25 g.p.m.
feet Direction TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
0.75 220
Submersible
Yes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well Co. 10125 LEUTHNER, M.
Remarks
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
sand-grayMinnesota Geological Survey
Quat. buried
Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters orSystem X Y443567 4951477
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 05/24/2007Name on mailbox
Angled Drill Hole
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031208958
County Carver Entry Date 05/26/1988
Quad Jordan Update Date 02/14/2014
Quad ID 90B Received Date
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedHAAS, AL 115 24 W 33 DDDBAA 142 ft. 142 ft. 03/12/1971
Elevation 820 ft. Elev. Method 7.5 minute topographic map (+/- 5 feet) Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? Yes
No
From To
0 ft.Casing Type Single casing
No
Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
DIRT 0 8 BLACK
CLAY & SAND 8 16 BROWN
GRAVEL, SAND, CLAY 16 37 GRAY
SAND & CLAY (LOOSE) 37 65 GRAY
CLAY 65 110 GRAY
SAND (MUDDY) 110 134 GRAY
WATER SAND 134 142 GRAY
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 139in. To ft. lbs./ft.
stainlessScreen? MakeX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set2 12in. ft.05 ft.ft.
Open Hole From ft. To ft.
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report208958
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/11/2020
Pitless adapter manufacturer Model
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above grade
AERMOTOR
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.85 Measureland surface 03/12/1971
ft.0 hrs. Pumping at 25 g.p.m.
feet Direction TypeWell disinfected upon completion? Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
03/00/1971
0.75
Submersible
Yes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well Co. 10125 LEUTHNER, R.
Remarks
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
sand-grayMinnesota Geological Survey
Quat. buried
Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters orSystem X Y444020 4952026
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 02/21/2003Information from
Angled Drill Hole
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031427452
County Carver Entry Date 05/26/1988
Quad Jordan Update Date 02/14/2014
Quad ID 90B Received Date
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedOLINGER, 114 24 W 4 ADDADC 270 ft. 270 ft. 10/20/1986
Elevation 869 ft. Elev. Method CALC FROM 2-FOOT COUNTY DEM Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Bentonite
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? Yes
No
From To
ThreadedCasing Type Single casing
No
X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
Well 7255 159TH ST MN
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
GRAVEL (COARSE) 0 85 SOFTYELLOW
CLAY & SAND 85 140 HARDGRAY
CLAY 140 258 MEDIUMGRAY
SAND 258 270 HARDBROWN
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 254 10.7in. To ft. lbs./ft.
stainlessScreen? Make JOHNSONX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set2 18in. ft.2655 270 ft.ft.
Open Hole From ft. To ft.
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
JUNCTION CREEK BLK 1 LOT 5.
Material FromAmount Tobentonite ft. ft.
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report427452
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/09/2020
MERRILLPitless adapter manufacturer Model
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above grade
RED JACKET
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.134 Measureland surface 10/20/1986
ft.150 hrs.2 Pumping at 30 g.p.m.
feet Direction TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
WATER 1 230
12196 Submersible
XYes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerGary's Well Co. 70417 SCHWICH, G.
Remarks
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
sand-brownMinnesota Geological Survey
Quat. buried
Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters orSystem X Y444173 4951153
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 05/24/2007Name on mailbox
Angled Drill Hole
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031430484
County Carver Entry Date 08/22/1989
Quad Jordan Update Date 02/14/2014
Quad ID 90B Received Date
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedREAD, GERALD 114 24 W 3 CCDADC 280 ft. 280 ft. 08/17/1987
Elevation 923 ft. Elev. Method 7.5 minute topographic map (+/- 5 feet) Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Bentonite
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? Yes
No
From To
ThreadedCasing Type Single casing
No
Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
C/W 16530 40 CR CARVER MN
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
TOP SOIL 0 3
CLAY 3 15
GRAVEL 15 100
CLAY 100 275
SAND 275 280
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 275in. To ft. lbs./ft.
stainlessScreen? Make JOHNSONX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set2 10in. ft.2755 280 ft.ft.
Open Hole From ft. To ft.
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
Material FromAmount Tobentonite ft.0 ft.0
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report430484
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/11/2020
MONITORPitless adapter manufacturer Model
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above gradeX
AERMOTOR
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.140 Measureland surface 08/17/1987
ft.275 hrs.0.5 Pumping at 30 g.p.m.
100 feet East Direction Septic tank/drain field TypeWell disinfected upon completion? Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
08/17/1987
0.75 220
11216 Submersible
Yes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerBraunwarth Well Co. 10068 BRAUNWORTH, M
Remarks
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
sandMinnesota Geological Survey
Quat. buried
Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters orSystem X Y444576 4950335
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 03/10/1995Information from
Angled Drill Hole
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031447121
County Carver Entry Date 08/22/1989
Quad Jordan Update Date 02/14/2014
Quad ID 90B Received Date
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedHENNING, JACK 114 24 W 9 BADCDB 446 ft. 446 ft. 12/01/1988
Elevation 902 ft. Elev. Method 7.5 minute topographic map (+/- 5 feet) Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? Yes
No
From To
Casing Type Single casing
No
X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
C/W 16860 40 CR CARVER MN
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
SAND & GRAVEL 0 15
CLAY 15 118 BLUE
COARSE GRAVEL 118 140
CLAY 140 150 BLUE
SHALE 150 270 WHITE
CLAY 270 360 BLUE
FINE SAND 360 370
SHALE 370 380 GREEN
HARD SAND ROCK 380 446
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 378in. To ft. lbs./ft.
Hole Diameter
6 378in. To ft.4 446in. To ft.
Screen? MakeType378Open Hole From ft. To ft.446
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
Material FromAmount Tobentonite ft.0 ft.0
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report447121
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/11/2020
WHITEWATERPitless adapter manufacturer Model
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above grade
WEBTROL
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.175 Measureland surface 12/01/1988
ft.175 hrs.3 Pumping at 35 g.p.m.
60 feet North Direction Septic tank/drain field TypeWell disinfected upon completion? Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
12/02/1988
150M 1.5 230
15210 Submersible
Yes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerR.E.S. Well Co. 27276 STODOLA, R.
Remarks
Eau Claire Formation
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
Mt.Simon SandstoneMinnesota Geological Survey
Eau Claire-Mt.370
Digitized - scale 1:24,000 or larger (Digitizing Table)System X Y443235 4949835
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 03/10/1995Information from
Angled Drill Hole
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031453898
County Carver Entry Date 08/22/1989
Quad Jordan Update Date 08/07/2007
Quad ID 90B Received Date
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedJAMES, BILL 114 24 W 4 ABABCD 216 ft. 216 ft. 09/08/1988
Elevation 895 ft. Elev. Method CALC FROM 2-FOOT COUNTY DEM Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? Yes
No
From To
ThreadedCasing Type Single casing
No
Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
Well 7575 50 CR MN
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
CLAY & SAND 0 28 SOFTBROWN
CLAY & SAND 28 184 SOFTGRAY
CLAY 184 203 SOFTGRAY
CLAY & SAND 203 210 SOFTGRAY
SAND 210 216 SOFTBROWN
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 211in. To ft. lbs./ft.
stainlessScreen? Make JOHNSONX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set2 12in. ft.5 ft.ft.
Open Hole From ft. To ft.
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
Material FromAmount Tobentonite ft. ft.
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report453898
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/11/2020
YESPitless adapter manufacturer Model
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above grade
AERMOTOR
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.155 Measureland surface 09/08/1988
ft. hrs. Pumping at 35 g.p.m.
feet Direction TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
0.75 220
12182 Submersible
XYes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well Co. 10125 SCHMIEG, K.
Remarks
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
sand-brownMinnesota Geological Survey
Quat. buried
Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters orSystem X Y443626 4951746
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 05/24/2007Name on mailbox
Angled Drill Hole
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031467122
County Carver Entry Date 12/25/1991
Quad Jordan Update Date 08/18/2014
Quad ID 90B Received Date
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedLINDQUIST, 114 24 W 4 CCDBBD 410 ft. 410 ft. 06/12/1991
Elevation 903 ft. Elev. Method 7.5 minute topographic map (+/- 5 feet) Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Other
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? Yes
No
From To
Threaded1 ft.
Casing Type Single casing
No
X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
C/W 7915 JOYCE RD COLOGNE MN 55322
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
SAND & CLAY 0 25 SOFTBROWN
CLAY & SAND 25 85 SOFTGRAY
CLAY 85 201 SOFTGRAY
SAND & CLAY 201 222 SOFTGRAY
CLAY & SAND 222 330 SOFTGRAY
SAND & CLAY 330 385 SOFTBROWN
SANDSTONE 385 410 SFT-HRDWHITE
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 387in. To ft. lbs./ft.
Hole Diameter
9 20in. To ft.6 387in. To ft.4 410in. To ft.
Screen? MakeType387Open Hole From ft. To ft.410
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
Material FromAmount Tobentonite ft.0 ft.0
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report467122
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/11/2020
WHITEWATERPitless adapter manufacturer Model SU4X5.5
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above grade
AERMOTOR
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.170 Measureland surface 06/12/1991
ft.175 hrs.1 Pumping at 35 g.p.m.
55 feet West Direction Septic tank/drain field TypeWell disinfected upon completion? Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
06/14/1991
1 230
12189 Submersible
Yes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well Co. 10125 SCHMIEG, K.
Remarks
Wonewoc Sandstone
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
Wonewoc SandstoneMinnesota Geological Survey
Wonewoc385
Digitized - scale 1:24,000 or larger (Digitizing Table)System X Y442796 4950371
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 03/10/1995Address verification
Angled Drill Hole
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031484790
County Carver Entry Date 12/18/1993
Quad Jordan Update Date 02/14/2014
Quad ID 90B Received Date
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedANDERSON, 114 24 W 3 BBCCCD 265 ft. 265 ft. 04/26/1993
Elevation 861 ft. Elev. Method CALC FROM 2-FOOT COUNTY DEM Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Bentonite
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? Yes
No
From To
ThreadedCasing Type Single casing
No
Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
Well 7220 159TH ST SW CARVER MN 55315
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
SAND 0 60 SOFT
CLAY 60 150 SOFT
CLAY GRAVEL 150 240
SAND 240 265
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 260 11in. To ft. lbs./ft.
Hole Diameter
8 265in. To ft.
stainlessScreen? Make COOKX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set2 15in. ft.2605 265 ft.ft.
Open Hole From ft. To ft.
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
Material FromAmount Toneat cement ft.0 260 ft.1.75 Cubic yardsbentonite ft. ft.
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report484790
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/11/2020
MONITORPitless adapter manufacturer Model
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above grade
AERMOTOR
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.130 Measureland surface 04/26/1993
ft.265 hrs.1 Pumping at 40 g.p.m.
150 feet North Direction Septic tank/drain field TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
04/26/1993
0.75 220
12162 Submersible
XYes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerBraunwarth Well Co. 10068 BRAUNWARTH, M
Remarks
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
sandMinnesota Geological Survey
Quat. buried
Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters orSystem X Y444230 4951456
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 05/24/2007Address verification
Angled Drill Hole
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031532161
County Carver Entry Date 12/18/1993
Quad Jordan Update Date 02/14/2014
Quad ID 90B Received Date
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedGULDEN, 114 24 W 3 BABCAB 317 ft. 317 ft. 08/06/1993
Elevation 887 ft. Elev. Method CALC FROM 2-FOOT COUNTY DEM Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Qwik gel
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? Yes
No
From To
Casing Type Single casing
No
X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
Well 15820 LUNDSTEAD RD MN
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
SAND 0 64 SOFTBROWN
SAND & CLAY 64 143 SOFTGRAY
SAND 143 161 SOFTGRAY
CLAY & SAND 161 290 SOFTGRAY
STONES 290 307 HARDGRAY
SAND 307 317 SOFTBROWN
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 312 1.9in. To ft. lbs./ft.
Hole Diameter
8.5 30in. To ft.6.2 317in. To ft.
plasticScreen? Make JAYCOX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set3 18in. ft.5 ft.ft.
Open Hole From ft. To ft.
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
Material FromAmount Toneat cement ft.0 30 ft.4 Sackswell grouted, type unknown ft.30 317 ft.
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report532161
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/11/2020
WHITEWATERPitless adapter manufacturer Model SU 45.5
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above grade
AERMOTOR
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.145 Measureland surface 08/06/1993
ft.150 hrs.1 Pumping at 30 g.p.m.
40 feet West Direction Other TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
08/09/1993
1 220
12168 Submersible
XYes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well Co. 10125 SCHMIEG, K.
Remarks
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
sand-brownMinnesota Geological Survey
Quat. buried
Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters orSystem X Y444670 4951720
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 05/24/2007Address verification
Angled Drill Hole
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031546820
County Carver Entry Date 06/05/1996
Quad Jordan Update Date 02/14/2014
Quad ID 90B Received Date
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedMARTIN, GLENN 114 24 W 3 BABDCB 294 ft. 294 ft. 05/04/1994
Elevation 872 ft. Elev. Method CALC FROM 2-FOOT COUNTY DEM Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Qwik gel
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? Yes
No
From To
Casing Type Single casing
No
X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
Well 15880 LUNDSTEAD RD MN
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
CLAY 0 48 SOFTBROWN
SAND & CLAY 48 132 SOFTGRAY
CLAY & SAND 132 261 SOFTGRAY
SAND & CLAY 261 280 SOFTGRAY
SAND 280 294 SOFTGRAY
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 284 1.9in. To ft. lbs./ft.
Hole Diameter
8.5 30in. To ft.6.2 294in. To ft.
plasticScreen? Make CRESLINEX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set4 15in. ft.10 ft.ft.
Open Hole From ft. To ft.
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
THE SOC IS A HOUSE
Material FromAmount Toneat cement ft. ft.
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report546820
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/11/2020
WHITEWATERPitless adapter manufacturer Model SU 45.5
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above grade
AERMOTOR
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.135 Measureland surface 05/04/1994
ft.140 hrs.1 Pumping at 40 g.p.m.
70 feet South Direction Other TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
1 220
12147 Submersible
XYes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well Co. 10125 SCHMIEG, K.
Remarks
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
sand-grayMinnesota Geological Survey
Quat. buried
Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters orSystem X Y444723 4951665
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 05/24/2007Address verification
Angled Drill Hole
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031546827
County Carver Entry Date 06/06/1996
Quad Jordan Update Date 02/14/2014
Quad ID 90B Received Date
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedCRUSE, LARRY 114 24 W 3 BADCCD 191 ft. 191 ft. 05/23/1994
Elevation 870 ft. Elev. Method CALC FROM 2-FOOT COUNTY DEM Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Qwik gel
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? Yes
No
From To
Casing Type Single casing
No
X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
Well 15950 LUNDSTEAD RD MN
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
SAND 0 81 SOFTBROWN
CLAY 81 136 SOFTGRAY
SAND & CLAY 136 182 SOFTBROWN
SAND 182 191 SOFTBROWN
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 185 1.9in. To ft. lbs./ft.
Hole Diameter
8.5 30in. To ft.6.2 191in. To ft.
plasticScreen? Make JAYCOX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set3 18in. ft.10 ft.ft.
Open Hole From ft. To ft.
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
THE SOC IS A HOUSE
Material FromAmount Toneat cement ft. ft.
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report546827
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/11/2020
WHITEWATERPitless adapter manufacturer Model SU 45.5
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above grade
MYERS
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.100 Measureland surface 05/23/1994
ft.105 hrs.1 Pumping at 40 g.p.m.
25 feet South Direction Other TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
1 220
12147 Submersible
XYes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well Co. 10125 SCHMIEG, K.
Remarks
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
sand-brownMinnesota Geological Survey
Quat. buried
Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters orSystem X Y444834 4951448
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 05/24/2007Address verification
Angled Drill Hole
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031546828
County Carver Entry Date 06/06/1996
Quad Jordan Update Date 02/14/2014
Quad ID 90B Received Date
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedDRAPP, 114 24 W 3 BADBCC 218 ft. 218 ft. 06/01/1994
Elevation 863 ft. Elev. Method CALC FROM 2-FOOT COUNTY DEM Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Qwik gel
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? Yes
No
From To
Casing Type Single casing
No
X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
Well 15920 LUNDSTEAD RD MN
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
SAND & GRAVEL 0 82 SOFTBROWN
CLAY & SAND 82 161 SOFTGRAY
SAND & CLAY 161 198 SOFTGRAY
SAND 198 218 SOFTBROWN
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 208 1.9in. To ft. lbs./ft.
Hole Diameter
8.5 30in. To ft.6.2 218in. To ft.
plasticScreen? Make CRESLINEX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set4 15in. ft.10 ft.ft.
Open Hole From ft. To ft.
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
THE SOC IS A HOUSE
Material FromAmount Toneat cement ft. ft.
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report546828
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/11/2020
WHITEWATERPitless adapter manufacturer Model SU 45.5
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above grade
AERMOTOR
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.75 Measureland surface 06/01/1994
ft.80 hrs.1 Pumping at 40 g.p.m.
30 feet South Direction Other TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
1 220
12105 Submersible
XYes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well Co. 10125 SCHMIEG, K.
Remarks
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
sand-brownMinnesota Geological Survey
Quat. buried
Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters orSystem X Y444811 4951556
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 05/24/2007Address verification
Angled Drill Hole
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031546829
County Carver Entry Date 06/06/1996
Quad Jordan Update Date 02/14/2014
Quad ID 90B Received Date
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedFAHEY, DOUG 114 24 W 4 DCCBAD 227 ft. 227 ft. 08/25/1994
Elevation 897 ft. Elev. Method CALC FROM 2-FOOT COUNTY DEM Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Qwik gel
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? Yes
No
From To
Casing Type Single casing
No
X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
Well 16480 WOODSVIEW LA MN
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
SAND 0 44 SOFTBROWN
CLAY 44 163 SOFTGRAY
SAND AND CLAY 163 204 SOFTBROWN
SAND 204 227 SOFTBROWN
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 215 1.9in. To ft. lbs./ft.
Hole Diameter
8.5 30in. To ft.6.2 227in. To ft.
stainlessScreen? Make JOHNSONX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set2 15in. ft.10 ft.ft.
Open Hole From ft. To ft.
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
THE SOURCE IS HOUSE
Material FromAmount Toneat cement ft. ft.
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report546829
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/11/2020
WHITEWATERPitless adapter manufacturer Model SU 45.5
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above grade
AERMOTOR
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.120 Measureland surface 08/25/1994
ft.125 hrs.1 Pumping at 35 g.p.m.
25 feet West Direction Other TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
0.75 220
10147 Submersible
XYes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well Co. 10125 LEUTHNER, M.
Remarks
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
sand-brownMinnesota Geological Survey
Quat. buried
Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters orSystem X Y443476 4950361
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 05/24/2007Address verification
Angled Drill Hole
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031554033
County Carver Entry Date 06/05/1996
Quad Jordan Update Date 02/14/2014
Quad ID 90B Received Date
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedKUSS, BYRON 114 24 W 3 BDABCA 126 ft. 126 ft. 10/13/1994
Elevation 843 ft. Elev. Method CALC FROM 2-FOOT COUNTY DEM Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Qwik gel
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? Yes
No
From To
Casing Type Single casing
No
X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
Well 16020 LUNDSTEAD RD MN
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
CLAY & SAND 0 34 SOFTBROWN
CLAY 34 97 SOFTGRAY
SAND 97 126 SOFTGRAY
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 106 1.9in. To ft. lbs./ft.
Hole Diameter
8.5 30in. To ft.6.2 126in. To ft.
plasticScreen? Make CRESLINEX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set4 15in. ft.10620 126 ft.ft.
Open Hole From ft. To ft.
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
Material FromAmount Toneat cement ft.0 30 ft.bentonite ft. ft.
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report554033
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/11/2020
WHITEWATERPitless adapter manufacturer Model SU 45.5
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above grade
STA-RITE
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.80 Measureland surface 10/13/1994
ft.85 hrs.1 Pumping at 25 g.p.m.
40 feet South Direction Septic tank/drain field TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
0.75 220
1096 Submersible
XYes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well Co. 10125 SCHMIEG, K.
Remarks
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
sand-grayMinnesota Geological Survey
Quat. buried
Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters orSystem X Y444851 4951364
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 05/24/2007Address verification
Angled Drill Hole
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031554037
County Carver Entry Date 06/06/1996
Quad Jordan Update Date 02/14/2014
Quad ID 90B Received Date
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedCOMBS, 114 24 W 4 DCBACC 175 ft. 175 ft. 11/02/1994
Elevation 892 ft. Elev. Method CALC FROM 2-FOOT COUNTY DEM Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Qwik gel
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? Yes
No
From To
ThreadedCasing Type Single casing
No
X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
Well 16450 WOODSVIEW LA MN
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
SAND 0 46 SOFTBROWN
CLAY & SAND 46 113 SOFTGRAY
CLAY 113 162 SOFTGRAY
SAND 162 175 SOFTGRAY
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 169 11in. To ft. lbs./ft.
Hole Diameter
8.5 30in. To ft.6.2 175in. To ft.
stainlessScreen? Make JOHNSONX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set2 18in. ft.8 ft.ft.
Open Hole From ft. To ft.
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
THE SOC IS A HOUSE.
Material FromAmount Tobentonite ft. ft.
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report554037
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/11/2020
WHITEWATERPitless adapter manufacturer Model SU 4X5.5
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above grade
STA-RITE
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.110 Measureland surface 11/02/1994
ft.115 hrs.1 Pumping at 30 g.p.m.
35 feet Southwes Direction Other TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
0.75 220
10126 Submersible
XYes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well Co. 10125 SCHMEIG, K.
Remarks
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
sand-grayMinnesota Geological Survey
Quat. buried
Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters orSystem X Y443496 4950515
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 05/24/2007Address verification
Angled Drill Hole
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031570174
County Carver Entry Date 06/09/2000
Quad Jordan Update Date 08/07/2007
Quad ID 90B Received Date
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedTORMOEN, JEFF 114 24 W 4 AABCCD 227 ft. 227 ft. 06/07/1999
Elevation 865 ft. Elev. Method CALC FROM 2-FOOT COUNTY DEM Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Bentonite
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? Yes
No
From To
Casing Type Single casing
No
X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
C/W 7350 159TH ST CARVER MN 55315
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
CLAY 0 20 MEDIUMBROWN
CLAY 20 200 MEDIUMGRAY
SAND, GRAVEL 200 227 MEDIUMBROWN
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 227in. To ft. lbs./ft.
Hole Diameter
8 227in. To ft.
plasticScreen? MakeX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set4 20in. ft.21710 227 ft.ft.
Open Hole From ft. To ft.
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
Material FromAmount Tohigh solids bentonite ft.0 217 ft.1 Cubic yards
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report570174
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/11/2020
WHITEWATERPitless adapter manufacturer Model
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above grade
AERMOTOR
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.130 Measureland surface 06/07/1999
ft.130 hrs.3 Pumping at 30 g.p.m.
150 feet North Direction Septic tank/drain field TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
06/07/1999
1 230
12180 Submersible
XYes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes X No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerAssociated Well Co. 27259 SCHULTZ, M.
Remarks
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
sand +larger-brownMinnesota Geological Survey
Quat. buried
Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters orSystem X Y443822 4951636
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 05/24/2007Address verification
Angled Drill Hole
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031588702
County Carver Entry Date 11/13/1997
Quad Jordan Update Date 02/14/2014
Quad ID 90B Received Date
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedASMUS, MARK 114 24 W 9 BACAAA 326 ft. 326 ft. 11/06/1997
Elevation 894 ft. Elev. Method CALC FROM 2-FOOT COUNTY DEM Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Qwik gel
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? Yes
No
From To
Casing Type Single casing
No
X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
Well 7730 MARTIN DR MN
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
CLAY 0 26 SOFTBROWN
CLAY & SAND 26 91 SOFTGRAY
CLAY 91 164 SOFTGRAY
CLAY & SAND 164 221 SOFTGRAY
CLAY 221 296 HARDGRAY
SAND 296 326 SOFTBROWN
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 306 1.9in. To ft. lbs./ft.
Hole Diameter
8.5 30in. To ft.6.2 326in. To ft.
plasticScreen? Make CRESTLINEX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set4 18in. ft.30620 326 ft.ft.
Open Hole From ft. To ft.
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
Material FromAmount Tohigh solids bentonite ft.0 30 ft.
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report588702
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/11/2020
WHITEWATERPitless adapter manufacturer Model SU 45.5
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above grade
AERMOTOR
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.160 Measureland surface 11/06/1997
ft.165 hrs.1 Pumping at 40 g.p.m.
70 feet Southeas Direction Septic tank/drain field TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
11/09/1996
1 220
12189 Submersible
XYes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes X No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well Co. 10125 LEUTHNER, M.
Remarks
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
sand-brownMinnesota Geological Survey
Quat. buried
Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters orSystem X Y443166 4949979
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 05/25/2007Address verification
Angled Drill Hole
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031588715
County Carver Entry Date 11/13/1997
Quad Jordan Update Date 02/14/2014
Quad ID 90B Received Date
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedRAIN, DARRIN 114 24 W 9 ABDAAA 282 ft. 282 ft. 05/15/1997
Elevation 907 ft. Elev. Method CALC FROM 2-FOOT COUNTY DEM Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Qwik gel
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? Yes
No
From To
Casing Type Single casing
No
X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
Well 16655 40 CR MN
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
SAND 0 61 SOFTBROWN
SAND & CLAY 61 114 SOFTGRAY
CLAY & SAND 114 257 SOFTGRAY
SAND 257 282 SOFTBROWN
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 262 1.9in. To ft. lbs./ft.
Hole Diameter
8.5 30in. To ft.6.2 282in. To ft.
plasticScreen? Make CRESTLINEX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set4 15in. ft.26220 282 ft.ft.
Open Hole From ft. To ft.
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
Material FromAmount Tohigh solids bentonite ft.0 30 ft.
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report588715
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/11/2020
WHITEWATERPitless adapter manufacturer Model SU 45.5
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above grade
AERMOTOR
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.160 Measureland surface 05/15/1997
ft.165 hrs.1 Pumping at 40 g.p.m.
100 feet West Direction Septic tank/drain field TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
0.75 220
10189 Submersible
XYes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes X No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well Co. 10125 LEUTHNER, M.
Remarks
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
sand-brownMinnesota Geological Survey
Quat. buried
Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters orSystem X Y443775 4949992
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 05/25/2007Address verification
Angled Drill Hole
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031633582
County Carver Entry Date 05/25/2001
Quad Jordan Update Date 04/13/2010
Quad ID 90B Received Date
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedTRIMBO, DON 114 24 W 5 ADDCAA 354 ft. 354 ft. 12/03/1999
Elevation 917 ft. Elev. Method CALC FROM 2-FOOT COUNTY DEM Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Qwik gel
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? XYes
No
From To
Casing Type Single casing
No
X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
Well 7930 JOYCE RD CARVER MN 55315
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
CLAY 0 41 SOFTBROWN
CLAY 41 122 SOFTGRAY
SAND & CLAY 122 157 SOFTGRAY
CLAY & SAND 157 203 SOFTGRAY
CLAY 203 309 SOFTGRAY
CLAY & SAND 309 332 SOFTGRAY
GRAVEL 332 354 SOFTBROWN
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 334 1.9in. To ft. lbs./ft.
Hole Diameter
8.5 30in. To ft.6.2 354in. To ft.
plasticScreen? Make CRESTLINEX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set4 18in. ft.33420 354 ft.ft.
Open Hole From ft. To ft.
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
Material FromAmount Tohigh solids bentonite ft.0 30 ft.3 Sacks
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report633582
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/11/2020
MONITORPitless adapter manufacturer Model PS 45
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above grade
AERMOTOR
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.170 Measureland surface 12/03/1999
ft.175 hrs.1 Pumping at 50 g.p.m.
80 feet West Direction Other TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
1 220
12210 Submersible
XYes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes X No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well Co. 10125 LEUTHNER, M.
Remarks
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
gravel (+larger)-brownMinnesota Geological Survey
Quat. buried
Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters orSystem X Y442462 4951070
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 05/24/2007Address verification
Angled Drill Hole
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031639234
County Carver Entry Date 02/09/2001
Quad Jordan Update Date 08/13/2007
Quad ID 90B Received Date
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedPOPPLER, 115 24 W 34 CCDBDD 119 ft. 119 ft. 06/28/2000
Elevation 901 ft. Elev. Method CALC FROM 2-FOOT COUNTY DEM Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Bentonite
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? XYes
No
From To
Casing Type Single casing
No
X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
Well 7060 50 CR CARVER MN 55315
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
TOP SOIL 0 3 SOFTBLACK
CLAY 3 25 SOFTYELLOW
CLAY GRAVEL 25 110 SOFTBLUE
SAND 110 119
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 114in. To ft. lbs./ft.
Hole Diameter
6.5 119in. To ft.
stainlessScreen? Make JOHNSONX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set2 25in. ft.1145 119 ft.ft.
Open Hole From ft. To ft.
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
Material FromAmount Tohigh solids bentonite ft.0 114 ft.1 Cubic yards
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report639234
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/11/2020
MONITORPitless adapter manufacturer Model
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above gradeX
STA RITE
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.70 Measureland surface 07/08/2000
ft.90 hrs.1 Pumping at 30 g.p.m.
100 feet West Direction Septic tank/drain field TypeWell disinfected upon completion? Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
07/08/2000
0.75 220
1090 Submersible
XYes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes X No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerBraunwarth Well Co. 10068 BRAUNWARTH, M
Remarks
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
sandMinnesota Geological Survey
Quat. buried
Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters orSystem X Y444491 4951939
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 05/21/2007Name on mailbox
Angled Drill Hole
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031692528
County Carver Entry Date 02/02/2005
Quad Jordan Update Date 08/08/2007
Quad ID 90B Received Date 08/26/2004
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedBERNIE, JOEL 114 24 W 4 BADDAB 334 ft. 334 ft. 07/07/2004
Elevation 897 ft. Elev. Method CALC FROM 2-FOOT COUNTY DEM Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Qwik gel
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? XYes
No
From To
Casing Type Single casing
No
X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
Well 7625 JOYCE RD COLOGNE MN 55322
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
CLAY 0 48 SOFTBROWN
BLUE CLAY 48 161 SOFTGRAY
CLAY & SAND 161 256 SOFTGRAY
CLAY 256 299 HARDGRAY
SAND & CLAY 299 314 HARDGRAY
SAND 314 334 HARDGRAY
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 314 1.9in. To ft. lbs./ft.
Hole Diameter
8.5 30in. To ft.6.2 334in. To ft.
plasticScreen? Make CRESLINEX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set4 15in. ft.31420 334 ft.ft.
Open Hole From ft. To ft.
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
Material FromAmount Tohigh solids bentonite ft.0 30 ft.3 Sacks
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report692528
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/19/2020
WHITEWATERPitless adapter manufacturer Model SU 45.5
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above grade
AERMOTOR
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.165 Measureland surface 07/07/2004
ft.170 hrs.1 Pumping at 40 g.p.m.
70 feet West Direction Septic tank/drain field TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
0.75 220
12189 Submersible
XYes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes X No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well Co. 10125 LEUTHNER, M
Remarks
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
sand-grayMinnesota Geological Survey
Quat. buried
Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters orSystem X Y443364 4951514
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 05/24/2007Address verification
Angled Drill Hole
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031692528
County Carver Entry Date 02/02/2005
Quad Jordan Update Date 08/08/2007
Quad ID 90B Received Date 08/26/2004
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedBERNIE, JOEL 114 24 W 4 BADDAB 334 ft. 334 ft. 07/07/2004
Elevation 897 ft. Elev. Method CALC FROM 2-FOOT COUNTY DEM Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Qwik gel
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? XYes
No
From To
Casing Type Single casing
No
X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
Well 7625 JOYCE RD COLOGNE MN 55322
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
CLAY 0 48 SOFTBROWN
BLUE CLAY 48 161 SOFTGRAY
CLAY & SAND 161 256 SOFTGRAY
CLAY 256 299 HARDGRAY
SAND & CLAY 299 314 HARDGRAY
SAND 314 334 HARDGRAY
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 314 1.9in. To ft. lbs./ft.
Hole Diameter
8.5 30in. To ft.6.2 334in. To ft.
plasticScreen? Make CRESLINEX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set4 15in. ft.31420 334 ft.ft.
Open Hole From ft. To ft.
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
Material FromAmount Tohigh solids bentonite ft.0 30 ft.3 Sacks
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report692528
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/09/2020
WHITEWATERPitless adapter manufacturer Model SU 45.5
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above grade
AERMOTOR
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.165 Measureland surface 07/07/2004
ft.170 hrs.1 Pumping at 40 g.p.m.
70 feet West Direction Septic tank/drain field TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
0.75 220
12189 Submersible
XYes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes X No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well Co. 10125 LEUTHNER, M
Remarks
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
sand-grayMinnesota Geological Survey
Quat. buried
Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters orSystem X Y443364 4951514
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 05/24/2007Address verification
Angled Drill Hole
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031718302
County Carver Entry Date 02/13/2006
Quad Jordan Update Date 08/07/2007
Quad ID 90B Received Date 12/12/2005
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedPEARSON, DAN 114 24 W 3 CCBCDB 345 ft. 345 ft. 09/13/2005
Elevation 904 ft. Elev. Method CALC FROM 2-FOOT COUNTY DEM Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Qwik gel
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? XYes
No
From To
Casing Type Single casing
No
X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
C/W 16550 40 CR CARVER MN 55315
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
SAND 0 18 SOFTBROWN
CLAY 18 62 SOFTGRAY
CLAY & SAND 62 141 SOFTGRAY
SAND 141 158 SOFTGRAY
CLAY & SAND 158 310 SOFTGRAY
SAND 310 345 SOFTBROWN
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 315 1.9in. To ft. lbs./ft.
Hole Diameter
8.5 30in. To ft.6.2 345in. To ft.
plasticScreen? Make CRESLINEX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set4 15in. ft.31530 345 ft.ft.
Open Hole From ft. To ft.
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
Material FromAmount Tohigh solids bentonite ft. 30 ft.3 Sacks
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report718302
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/11/2020
WHITEWATERPitless adapter manufacturer Model SU 45.5
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above grade
AERMOTOR
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.160 Measureland surface 09/13/2005
ft.165 hrs.1 Pumping at 50 g.p.m.
100 feet East Direction Body of water TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
3 220
20210 Submersible
XYes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes X No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well Co. 10125 LEUTHNER, M.
Remarks
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
sand-brownMinnesota Geological Survey
Quat. buried
Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters orSystem X Y444272 4950469
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 05/24/2007Address verification
Angled Drill Hole
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031718334
County Carver Entry Date 10/03/2005
Quad Jordan Update Date 08/08/2007
Quad ID 90B Received Date 05/31/2005
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedSECK, RANDY 114 24 W 4 BCDDBD 390 ft. 390 ft. 03/14/2005
Elevation 909 ft. Elev. Method CALC FROM 2-FOOT COUNTY DEM Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Qwik gel
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? XYes
No
From To
Casing Type Single casing
No
X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
Well 7855 JOYCE AV CARVER MN 55315
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
CLAY 0 31 SOFTBROWN
SAND & CLAY 31 74 SOFTGRAY
CLAY 74 192 SOFTGRAY
CLAY & SAND 192 258 SOFTGRAY
CLAY 258 331 SOFTGRAY
SAND & CLAY 331 365 SOFTBROWN
SAND 365 390 HARDBROWN
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 370 1.9in. To ft. lbs./ft.
Hole Diameter
8.5 30in. To ft.6.2 390in. To ft.
plasticScreen? Make CRESLINEX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set4 15in. ft.37020 390 ft.ft.
Open Hole From ft. To ft.
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
Material FromAmount Tohigh solids bentonite ft. 30 ft.3 Sacks
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report718334
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/09/2020
WHITEWATERPitless adapter manufacturer Model SU 45.5
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above grade
AERMOTOR
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.170 Measureland surface 03/14/2005
ft.175 hrs.1 Pumping at 50 g.p.m.
80 feet South Direction Septic tank/drain field TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
1 220
12210 Submersible
XYes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes X No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well Co. 10125 LEUTHNER, M.
Remarks
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
sand-brownMinnesota Geological Survey
Quat. buried
Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters orSystem X Y442936 4951066
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 05/24/2007Name on mailbox
Angled Drill Hole
Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031825605
County Carver Entry Date 08/31/2017
Quad Jordan Update Date 02/09/2018
Quad ID 90B Received Date 08/07/2017
Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedWALSH, ROGER 114 24 W 4 ADAABB 182 ft. 182 ft. 08/03/2017
Elevation 859.6 Elev. Method LiDAR 1m DEM (MNDNR) Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Bentonite
Address Use domestic Status Active
Well Hydrofractured? XYes
No
From To
Casing Type Single casing
No
X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint
C/W 7250 159 ST CARVER MN 55315
Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness
SAND & GRAVEL 0 60 BROWN
CLAY 60 140 GRAY
SAND & CLAY 140 160 GRAY
SAND 160 182 BROWN
Stratigraphy Information
Casing Diameter Weight
4 162in. To ft. lbs./ft.
Hole Diameter
8.5 20in. To ft.6.5 182in. To ft.
plasticScreen? Make BIGFOOTX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set4 12in. ft.16220 182 ft.ft.
Open Hole From ft. To ft.
Static Water Level
Pumping Level (below land surface)
Material FromAmount Tocuttings ft. ft.bentonite ft. 60 ft.4 Sacks
Wellhead Completion
Pump
Nearest Known Source of Contamination
Abandoned
Variance
Well Contractor
Minnesota Well Index Report825605
HE-01205-15
Printed on 12/11/2020
MERRILLPitless adapter manufacturer Model SMCK410
At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above grade
STA RITE
X
Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?
Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified
No
ft.75 Measureland surface 08/03/2017
ft.150 hrs.2 Pumping at 30 g.p.m.
75 feet North Direction Septic tank/drain field TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes
Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name
Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.
0.75 240
10100 Submersible
XYes No
Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes X No
Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well, Inc. 1480 LEUTHNER, B.
Remarks
Miscellaneous
Last Strat
AquiferDepth to Bedrock
Located by
Locate Method
First Bedrock
Minnesota Department of HealthGPS SA Off (averaged) (15 meters)
System X Y444105 4951429
ft
UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters
Unique Number Verification Input Date 06/21/2017Info/GPS from data
Angled Drill Hole
Attachment 4
General Requirements for Above Ground Storage
Tanks
General Requirements for Aboveground Storage Tanks
Tanks/Aboveground Storage Tanks #1.02 • April 2004
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency • 520 Lafayette Rd. N., St. Paul, MN 55155-4194 • www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats
t-a1-02
his fact sheet outlines the requirements for regulated above-ground storage tanks (ASTs) found
in Minn. R. chs. 7001 and 7151. These rules apply to all ASTs storing a liquid substance that is not gaseous or solid at ambient temperature and pressure.
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) must be notified about all ASTs within 30 days of installation or change in tank status (Minn. Stat. § 116.48).
The AST rules and notification statute does not indicate a minimum tank size, but the MPCA considers the smallest AST requiring registration to be a tank that is 500 gallons or greater in capacity. This size is consistent with underground storage tank notification requirements.
Owners and operators must complete and submit the AST Notification Form to the MPCA. To get a copy of this form, call MPCA at 651-296-6300 or toll-free at 1-800-657-3864 or on the MPCA Web site at www.pca.state.mn.us/cleanup/ast.
Exemptions from notification Tanks not required to be registered include:
• farm or residential tanks 1,100 gallons or less storing motor fuel for noncommercial purposes
• heating oil tanks 1,100 gallons or less
• agricultural chemical tanks
• tanks storing liquids that are a gas at atmospheric temperature and pressure
• tote tanks
• temporary tanks
• tanks that are less than 500 gallons
AST requirements Owners and operators must comply with AST requirements in Minn. R. 7151, unless exempted as outlined below.
Many ASTs are exempt from Minn. R. ch. 7151. They are:
• tanks containing 500 gallons or less
• farm tanks
• residential tanks 1,100 gallons or less used for noncommercial purposes
• equipment or machinery containing substances for operational purposes like hydraulic lift tanks, heating and cooling equipment, and electrical equipment
• vehicles designed and used to transport substances that don’t remain at the same location for more than 30 consecutive days or refill at the same site after dispensing the tank’s contents
• heating oil tanks 1,100 gallons or less
• wastewater treatment facility equipment
• indoor tanks
• tote tanks
• tanks greater than 500 gallons capacity, but less than or equal to 1,100 gallons capacity that are more than 500 feet from surface water
T
General Requirements for Aboveground Storage Tanks • t-a1-02 • April 2004
Page 2
• septic tanks
• a surface impoundment, pit, pond, or lagoon
• stormwater collection systems
• temporary tanks (tanks at a site less than 30 days
• storage tanks with drinking water, filtered-surface water, demineralized water, noncontact cooling water, or water stored for emergency purposes
Requirements for regulated tanks greater than 1,100 gallons All regulated tanks with a capacity greater than 1,100 gallons must:
• be registered with the MPCA
• be labeled
• be constructed using appropriate industry standards
• have secondary containment
• have a facility sign posted
• have substance transfer area safeguards
• have internal and/or external corrosion protection
• have overfill protection
• be monitored for leaks and regularly inspected
• be properly maintained
• have monitoring and inspection records on site
• assess releases during operations or at tank removal and report them to the State Duty Officer at 1-800-422-0798
• label lines so connections can be identified during substance transfer
• have underground piping safeguards if utilized
• be properly closed if no longer used
• be sampled for contamination when tank is removed
More information about these requirements and their effective dates can be found in fact sheets listed at the end of this document in the “Need more information” section.
Requirements for AST facilities with a capacity greater than one million gallons Facilities with greater than one million gallons total capacity for all liquid storage tanks must apply to the MPCA for a major facility permit. Requirements for tanks at these facilities are based on the individual site and tank characteristics (Minn. R. 7001.4200).
Requirements for small tanks near surface water Regulated tanks with a capacity of greater than 500 gallons, but less than or equal to 1,100 gallons that are within 500 feet of a class 2 surface water (water that can be used for recreational purposes) are required to:
• be registered with the MPCA
• be labeled
• provide secondary containment
• have a sign at the facility
• be constructed using appropriate industry standards
Requirements for temporary tanks Tanks larger than 1,100 gallons that store product for longer than 30 days, but less than one year are defined as temporary tanks and must:
• be labeled
• have a posted facility sign
• have secondary containment
• be maintained Temporary tanks with a capacity of greater than 500 gallons within 500 feet of a class 2 surface water must also meet the temporary tank requirements listed above. The MPCA will not require temporary tanks to be registered, however the rule requirements still apply.
Compliance with other regulations Other regulations that tank owners need to be in compliance with include:
General Requirements for Aboveground Storage Tanks • t-a1-02 • April 2004
Page 3
• the federal Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures Plan
• the Minnesota “Spill Bill” requirements
• hazardous waste regulations
• state and local fire code
• other state and local regulations
Also, petroleum products that are stored for resale in ASTs greater than 2,000 gallons must comply with the petroleum product delivery law (see Petroleum Product Delivery Law fact sheet for more information).
Need more information? Visit the AST Program at www.pca.state.mn.us/cleanup/ast.html. The site has forms, fact sheets, and other information about ASTs and AST requirements. You can also call the MPCA at 651-296-6300 or 1-800-657-3864.
Attachment 5
DNR NHI Database Review Letter
Attachment 6
State Historic Preservation Office Review
1
Kirsten Pauly
From: MN_MNIT_Data Request SHPO <[email protected]>Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2020 5:58 PMTo: Cassandra BordenSubject: RE: Database Search Request
Hello Cassandra, Our database has no archaeologic or historic records for the given TRS. Jim
SHPO Data Requests Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office 50 Sherburne Avenue, Suite 203 Saint Paul, MN 55155 (651) 201‐3299 [email protected] Notice: This email message simply reports the results of the cultural resources database search you requested. The database search is only for previously known archaeological sites and historic properties. IN NO CASE DOES THIS DATABASE SEARCH OR EMAIL MESSAGE CONSTITUTE A PROJECT REVIEW UNDER STATE OR FEDERAL PRESERVATION LAWS – please see our website at https://mn.gov/admin/shpo/protection/ for further information regarding our Environmental Review Process. Because the majority of archaeological sites in the state and many historic/architectural properties have not been recorded, important sites or properties may exist within the search area and may be affected by development projects within that area. Additional research, including field surveys, may be necessary to adequately assess the area’s potential to contain historic properties or archaeological sites. Properties that are listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) or have been determined eligible for listing in the NRHP are indicated on the reports you have received, if any. The following codes may be on those reports: NR – National Register listed. The properties may be individually listed or may be within the boundaries of a National Register District. CEF – Considered Eligible Findings are made when a federal agency has recommended that a property is eligible for listing in the National Register and MN SHPO has accepted the recommendation for the purposes of the Environmental Review Process. These properties need to be further assessed before they are officially listed in the National Register. SEF – Staff eligible Findings are those properties the MN SHPO staff considers eligible for listing in the National Register, in circumstances other than the Environmental Review Process. DOE – Determination of Eligibility is made by the National Park Service and are those properties that are eligible for listing in the National Register, but have not been officially listed. CNEF – Considered Not Eligible Findings are made during the course of the Environmental Review Process. For the purposes of the review a property is considered not eligible for listing in the National Register. These properties may need to be reassessed for eligibility under additional or alternate contexts. Properties without NR, CEF, SEF, DOE, or CNEF designations in the reports may not have been evaluated and therefore no assumption to their eligibility can be made. Integrity and contexts change over time, therefore any eligibility determination made ten (10) or more years from the date of the current survey are considered out of date and the property will need to be reassessed. If you require a comprehensive assessment of a project’s potential to impact archaeological sites or historic/architectural properties, you may need to hire a qualified archaeologist and/or historian. If you need assistance with a project review, please contact Kelly Gragg‐Johnson, Environmental Review Specialist @ 651‐201‐3285 or by email at [email protected]. The Minnesota SHPO Archaeology and Historic/Architectural Survey Manuals can be found at https://mn.gov/admin/shpo/identification‐evaluation/.