Transcript
Page 1: Creating actionable knowledge: Reflections of an Action Research Cohort

Creating actionable knowledge: Reflections of an Action Research

Cohort.

Tim Haslett, John Barton, John Molineux, Jane Olsen, Rod Sarah, John Stephens,

Susanne Tepe and Beverly Walker

Page 2: Creating actionable knowledge: Reflections of an Action Research Cohort

Monash Action Research PhD Cohort

• Eight members.

• Six PhD, one DBA, one supervisor.

• All have completed or taught in the MOS.

• High social cohesion.

• Significant publication record.

Page 3: Creating actionable knowledge: Reflections of an Action Research Cohort

PG Study Worklife

Action Research Loop

PhD Program

Research Skills

RelevanceRelevance

Action Research Loop

A developmental model

Page 4: Creating actionable knowledge: Reflections of an Action Research Cohort

Guiding Principle

There is a nexus between theory and action that is dynamic and on-going.

It is a function of the university to create the knowledge for this connection

This should be “recoverable” (Checkland and Howell, 1998).

Page 5: Creating actionable knowledge: Reflections of an Action Research Cohort

The Cohort

• John Barton

– Director, Marshall Place Associates

– Extensive teaching systems theory in Higher Education.

• John Molineux

– HR Manager - Australian Tax Office

– Change programs reshaping organisational culture.

• Jane Olsen

– Director, Arras Noble

– Strategic management and change in banking

• Tim Haslett

– Senior lecturer, Department of Management, Monash

– Action research in universities

Page 6: Creating actionable knowledge: Reflections of an Action Research Cohort

The Cohort

• Rod Sarah

– Learning and Development Manager, Monyx

– Translating Master’s degrees into Organizational Learning

• John Stephens

– CEO, Greyhound Racing Victoria

– implementations of viable systems methodology..

• Susanne Tepe

– Director, Australian Management Systems

– Translating science decisions into public policy

• Bev Walker

– Director, Janusian Consulting

– implementing strategic change in NFPs

Page 7: Creating actionable knowledge: Reflections of an Action Research Cohort

Recoverable Structures

• Common academic background• Studied together• Strong base in systems theory• Minor thesis on Action Research• Single supervisor • Emergent ideas• Metaphors• Cohort

Page 8: Creating actionable knowledge: Reflections of an Action Research Cohort

Common Background

Systems

Thinking

and Theory

Organizational

Learning

System Dynamics

Modelling

Advanced Topics

in Systems

Masters

Action Research

Doctoral

Action Research

Page 9: Creating actionable knowledge: Reflections of an Action Research Cohort

Flood (2001) argued that System Dynamics, Soft

Systems Methodology, Critical Systems

Thinking, Total Systems Intervention and

Complexity Theory were necessary

pre-requisites for conducting AR.

Page 10: Creating actionable knowledge: Reflections of an Action Research Cohort

Emergent idea 1

FF

MM

AA

There are somelinked ideas These are ways

ofapplying the ideas There is an

Area where theideas areapplied

Content Reflection- you think about the issues, what happened, etc

Process Reflection- you think about the strategies, procedures & how things are being done, etc

Premise Reflection- you think about the underlying assumptions, perspectives & premises that you based your ideas on (ie-your mental models)

Checkland-Mezirow Representation of Action Research

Page 11: Creating actionable knowledge: Reflections of an Action Research Cohort

Emergent idea 2

Lewin’s Experiential Learning Model. (Source: Kolb, 1984: 21)

ConcreteExperiences

Testing implications ofconcepts in new

situations

Formation of abstractconcepts and

generalizations

Observations andreflections

Page 12: Creating actionable knowledge: Reflections of an Action Research Cohort

Emergent idea 3

Ashby’s Law of Requisite Variety

Universities

Creation of Actionable Knowledge

Knowledge Action

Organisations

Page 13: Creating actionable knowledge: Reflections of an Action Research Cohort

Thinking theory

University Organization

Publishing Action

Work to be done

Page 14: Creating actionable knowledge: Reflections of an Action Research Cohort

The Metaphors 1 - The Journey

Page 15: Creating actionable knowledge: Reflections of an Action Research Cohort

The Metaphors 2 - Siberian Winters

Page 16: Creating actionable knowledge: Reflections of an Action Research Cohort

The Metaphors 3 - Tidal Waves

Page 17: Creating actionable knowledge: Reflections of an Action Research Cohort

Implications

• Masters becomes entry requirement

• Research methodology in Masters

• Research component in Masters

• Build DBA out of resource/research strengths

Page 18: Creating actionable knowledge: Reflections of an Action Research Cohort

The Importance of Cohorts

• High support needs of Doctoral students

• Role of co-researcher

• Lessen the impact of supervisor

• Commonality of interest (methodological)

Page 19: Creating actionable knowledge: Reflections of an Action Research Cohort

Research MethodologyStudent

Organization

Supervisor

Research Context

Two Research Models

Research Methodology

Student

Organization

Supervisor

Research Context

Page 20: Creating actionable knowledge: Reflections of an Action Research Cohort

The Challenges

• Differentiate from PhD

• Avoid “commodification”

• Provision of supervision


Recommended