Coronal Mass Ejections: from the Sun to the Earth
Consuelo CidSpace Research Group-Space Weather
University of Alcala
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011
2
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 20, November 11, 1859
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011
3
Magnetic Observations at Kew
Two responses seen in the new photographic recordings of magnetic variations being made at Kew (London)• Prompt response (due to X-rays increasing ionospheric ionization)• Great Magnetic Storm begins 18 hours later (due to associated emission reaching Earth)
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 4
Solar mass ejections• Unmagnetized material
(Lindenmann, 1919)• A plasma cloud including
frozen-in magnetic field loops• Plasma including turbulent
magnetic fields• A “tongue” of magnetic field
loops rooted at the Sun• A disconnected “plasmoid” or
“bubble”• Shock wave ahead of a region
of enhanced turbulence ….• Flux rope (Burlaga, 1988)
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 5
CMES AT THE SUNCoronal Mass Ejections: from the Sun to the Earth
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 6
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 7
The first CME observed in 1860?
This early observation was not confirmed convincingly. However...
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 8
The first CMEs observed in modern times: OSO 7 (1971) and Skylab (1973)
...the similarity with Skylab images obtained 113 years later is striking!
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 9
This was the first published
‘modern‘ CME event,
observed 1971 from OSO 7
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 10
CME? ...can’t tell what it is, but if I see it I know it...
What, actually, is a CME?Definition of terms: “A coronal mass ejection (CME) is … an observable change in coronal
structure that 1) occurs on a time scale of a few minutes and several hours and 2) involves the appearance (and outward motion) of a new, discrete, bright, white-light feature in the coronagraph field of view." (Hundhausen et al., 1984)
This definition is very fortunate in that• it emphasizes the observational aspect,• it stresses the transient event character,• it does not infer an interpretation of the "feature" and its potential origin,• in particular, it does NOT infer any conjunction with "coronal mass", • it restricts the applicability of the term to the Sun's proximity
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 11
Just an example of what a CME is
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 12
Some CMEs are spectacular, indeed!
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 13
Properties of CMEs
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 14
A unique observation by LASCO-C2.Note the helical structure of the prominence and filaments!
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 15
The most popular astronomical picture in history: a huge prominence seen in the He+ line (30.4 nm), from Skylab (1973)
From that time in 1973 on, CMEs were an issue!
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 16
The helical structure could just disappear because of 2D-projection on the plane of sky
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 17
Full halo CMEs: ejections towards or away the Earth
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 18
X-Ray or EUV images show coronal loops anchored in the photosfere
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 19
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 20
Reconnection and CMEs
• Above CME• Release mechanism in
“breakout” model • Fast CMEs
• Below CME• Release mechanism in
“emerging flux” model• Slow CMEs
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 21
Hight helicity: one of the clues for the “emerging flux” model
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 22
Checking the “breakout model”: dimming at solar disk
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 23
CMEs AT INTERPLANETARY MEDIUMCoronal Mass Ejections: from the Sun to the Earth
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 24
Solar wind …and solar wind transients
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 25
ICME signatures in solar wind
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 26
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 27
The first ‘magnetic cloud’Burlaga et al., 1991
… and the topology proposed
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 28
Note the 180º rotation of the
magnetic field direction through
the cloud!
Minimum Variance Analysis
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 29
Are all ICME MCs?...
…the answer is still on debate
Today: Magnetic cloud = flux rope
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 30
From 1D to 3D
… well, just 2D+1/2 D
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 31
Force-free model (Burlaga, 98)
a=cte Lundquist (1950)
BB
a
0 0
0 1
( )( )
0
axial
azth
r
B B J rB B HJ rB
aa
ar
0
B0
Baz
Beje
2.4 0
Boundary: Baxial=0 aR=2.4
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 32
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 33
MCs expand!Force-free?
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 34
First non-force free MC modelPlasma and magnetic field inside magnetic clouds: a global study (Cid et al., 2001)
• The starting point:(0, , ), with , cte
0y y
r
j j j j r j
B a
• Analytical expressions:
2 20
2yB R r
a
0
2 yB j r
0rB
022224
20
24Pr jRrP
aa
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 35
XGSE
YGSE
ZGSEXGSE
ZGSE
YGSE
y0
90ºq
f
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 36
The model reproduced properly experimental data…
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 37
.. but not for all MCs. Elliptical MCs
Elliptical cross-section model for the magnetic topology of magnetic clouds (Hidalgo, Nieves-Chinchilla and Cid, 2002)
It fits well... but many parameters need to be controlled
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 38
Reconstruction of the cross section using Grad-Safranov equation
But MC boundaries are
difficult to be established
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 39
Numerical simulations
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 40
From the Sun to L1
• Experimental data and models do not agree systematicaly: only a few cases have been reproduced nowadays
• Where is the problem to be solved?…In the magnetic topology?…In the propagation through the solar wind?
… more work needed!
41
The problem is still harder!
Complex ejecta,
multiMC…
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 42
CMEs AT TERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENT
Coronal Mass Ejections: from the Sun to the Earth
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 43
At solar wind (L1)
At the terrestrial surface
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 44
day of November 2003
1 6 11 16 21 26 31
Dst
(nT)
-500
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 45
Energy injected from solar wind (Dungey, 1961): proportional to convective electric field (Ey=VBz)
ICMEs present large
values of V and B z
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 46
* *( )dDst DstQ tdt
( ) 5.4t
Dst Q t dt Ey t
DPS relation: The decrease of the horizontal component of the geomagnetic field is proportional to the energy content of the ring current
From the energy balance in the ring current, it is possible to get the Dst index as a function of time
Neglecting losses (main phase):
Theoretical scenario
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 47
t (h)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Ey (m
V/m
)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
I (nT
)
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
t (h)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
(B z
) (nT
)
0
5
10
15
20
25
Cumulated Ey is not enought to explain the terrestrial disturbance for small t
… but theoretical expectations do not fit properly experimental data
Soon appearing in GRL…
Bz standard deviation is large for those events
BE v B
t
Both, E convective and B/t, are related to the appearance of an induced E
Ey
Our results agree with Faraday law!
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Plasma Physics, Madrid (Spain), June 6-7 2011 49
The phenomena are complicated and without limit as we look to finer and finer detail. It is not our goal to pursue the endless detail; instead, we are interested in understanding what we observe in terms of the basic laws of physics. We want to know how the observed effects follow from Newton, Maxwell, Lorentz, Schorödinger, etc. We construct idealized and simplified theoretical models for the purpose of demonstrating how the basic laws of physics lead to a certain observed effect. We pursue detail only insofar as it leads to novel effects, in which the basic laws of physics interact in some new and hitherto unknown combination.”
Eugene N. Parker