E i E t idEnergize EastsideComm nit Ad isor Gro p Meeting #2Community Advisory Group Meeting #2
Senior Project Manager,
Leann Kostek
j gPuget Sound Energy
February 12, 2014
Information requested at meeting #1 Energy split for plug loads Capacity increase the project would bring in p y p j g
2018 Total population benefit from project Points of flexibility in design New technology alternativesgy Battery storage Integrated Resource Plan (IRP)g ( )
2
Information requested at meeting #1
Energy split for plug loads Capacity increase the project would bring in p y p j g
2018 Total population benefit from projectp p p j Points of flexibility in design New technology alternativesgy Battery storage Integrated Resource Plan (IRP)Integrated Resource Plan (IRP)
3
Information requested at meeting #1
Energy split for plug loads Capacity increase the project would bring p y p j g
in 2018 Total population benefit from projectp p p j Points of flexibility in design New technology alternativesgy Battery storage Integrated Resource Plan (IRP)Integrated Resource Plan (IRP)
4
Information requested at meeting #1
Energy split for plug loads Capacity increase the project would bring in p y p j g
2018 Total population benefit from projectp p p j Points of flexibility in design New technology alternativesgy Battery storage Integrated Resource Plan (IRP)Integrated Resource Plan (IRP)
5
Information requested at meeting #1
Points of flexibility in design Span lengthp g Pole height Pole diameterPole diameter Pole configuration Pole spotting/placementPole spotting/placement Pole material/finish
6
Information requested at meeting #1
Energy split for plug loads Capacity increase the project would bring in p y p j g
2018 Total population benefit from projectp p p j Points of flexibility in design New technology alternativesgy Battery storage Integrated Resource Plan (IRP)Integrated Resource Plan (IRP)
7
Information requested at meeting #1
Battery storage Energy storage pilot projects:gy g p p j 0.5 MW / 1.0 Mwh battery
• $2.9 Million• Target completion Q4 2014
2 MW / 4.4 Mwh battery• $12 Million• Completion date TBD• Completion date - TBD
8
Information requested at meeting #1
Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Filed most recent IRP in May 2013y Evaluates generation to meet customer
needs 20 years into futurey Typically transmission projects to address
customer demand aren’t mentioned
9
Questions from meeting #1
Is the I-90 corridor an option? Could existing Seattle City Light (SCL) or g y g ( )
Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) lines provide the needed capacity or route for the project?
If existing/potential industrial users conserve ill th t h l t th d?more, will that help meet the need?
10
11
PUBLIC COMMENTPUBLIC COMMENT
11
E i E t idEnergize EastsideSol tion st d and ro te segmentsSolution study and route segments
Senior Project Manager,
Leann Kostek
Deputy Project Manager,
Jens Nedrudj g
Puget Sound EnergyDeputy Project Manager, Puget Sound Energy
Andy Bury
Tetra Tech
February 12, 2014
Presentation overview
1. Review the problem2. Overview of solution selection processp3. How PSE identified and narrowed the route
segmentsg4. Introduction to project route segments
13
Why is Energize Eastside needed?
Growth is straining the Eastside’s existing transmission systemtransmission system
Conservation alone is not enough to meet the challengechallenge
We need to act now Upgrades will power the Eastside’s growth intoUpgrades will power the Eastside s growth into
the future
14
How do we meet the need?
Solution study objective: Address transmission capacity deficiency on the p y yEastside that develops in late 2017
15
Solution selection processWhat are the potential approaches to meet the Eastside’s electricity needs?
Wh t h id hWhat approaches provide enough electricity to meet the Eastside’s needs?
What solutions best deliver electricit to the Eastside?electricity to the Eastside?
16
Solution selection processWhat solutions can PSE move forward with?
Where could PSE build a solution?
What does the public recommend?What does the public recommend?
17
Solution selection processWhat are the potential approaches to meet the Eastside’s electricity needs?
Th t b i t d f i l ti tThe team brainstormed four main solution types: Conservation (demand-side reduction)
L l ti Local generation Transformer-only addition Transmission lines plus transformer
18
Solution selection processWhat approaches provide enough electricity to meet the Eastside’s needs?
180 L d R d ti N d d
140
160
180 Load Reduction Needed(Higher Load Growth Scenario)
80
100
120
Load Reduction Needed(100% Conservation Load Scenario)
20
40
60
0
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
YearConservation Potential Demand Reduction Potential Demand Growth Potential
19
Conservation Potential Demand Reduction Potential Demand Growth Potential
Solution selection processWhat approaches provide enough electricity to meet the Eastside’s needs?
20
Solution selection processWhat approaches provide enough electricity to meet the Eastside’s needs?
21
Solution selection processWhat approaches provide enough electricity to meet the Eastside’s needs?
22
Solution selection processWhat solutions best deliver electricity to the Eastside?
23
Powerflow analysis
24
Solution selection processWhat solutions best deliver electricity to the Eastside?
Studies were performed on 27 alternatives Studies were performed on 27 alternatives PSE evaluated each alternative for: System performance System performance Flexibility
L it Longevity Reduced 27 alternatives down to 12 solutions
25
Route selection processWhat solutions can PSE move forward with?
26
Solution selection processWhere could PSE build a solution?
27
Solution selection process
Overview of route segment selection Define interconnections and study areaDefine interconnections and study area Collect Geographic Information Systems
(GIS) data and professional input( ) p p Identify corridors and alternative routes
with Linear Routing Tool Compare route weightings Refine routes interactivelyy Discuss routes with the public and
agencies
28
g
Solution selection process
Public land ownershipL d
Examples of collected data:
Land use Public rights-of-way Wildlife Wildlife Protected vegetation Threatened and
endangered species Environmentally critical
areas Topography Historical resources
29
Historical resources
Solution selection process
Data preparation Prepare GIS data for analysisp y Quality control
30
Solution selection process
Identifying corridors and routes Assign values (weightings) to each dataAssign values (weightings) to each data
layer Linear Routing Tool identifies corridors andLinear Routing Tool identifies corridors and
routes Create suitability grid Identify linear routes
31
How the layers work
Opportunity Opportunity Areas
Constraints (avoidance areas)
32
Routing Tool creates suitability gridArterial corridorsOpportunity
Slope stability Avoid
Land useAreas of opportunity and avoidance
Summed suitability gridAvoid red, use green
33
Avoid red, use green
Solution selection process
Example suitability gridsuitability grid
34
How data changes routes
Land use Land use + Land use +
35
Land use Land use Barriers around structures
Land use Barriers around structures +Wetlands
Potential route segments
PLACEHOLDER: MAP OF YELLOW ROUTES
36
Route selection process
What does the public recommend?
37
QUESTIONS?QUESTIONS?
38
39
ROUTE SEGMENTROUTE SEGMENT CONVERSATION
39
Sub-Area Committee process
40
Sub-area boundaries
41
42
EVALUATION PROCESSEVALUATION PROCESS
42
How this process will work
Multi-Objective Decision Analysis Step 1: Determine community values for p y
evaluation Step 2: Weight community valuesp g y Step 3: Score each option using community
values Step 4: Discuss and validate numerical results Step 5: Consensus recommendationp
43
Next steps for the advisory group
Participate in Sub-Area Committee workshops to develop sub-area route segment combinations for full advisory group discussion
Develop potential route options based on input from Sub-Area Committees
44
Upcoming activitiesSub-Area Committee MeetingsNorth sub-area:
W k h #1 M 19 2014•Workshop #1: Mar. 19, 2014 •Workshop #2: Apr. 2, 2014 •Meeting: Apr. 16, 2014
Central sub-area:•Workshop #1: Mar. 12, 2014 •Workshop #2: Mar 26 2014•Workshop #2: Mar. 26, 2014•Meeting: Apr. 9, 2014
South sub-area:South sub area:•Workshop #1: Mar. 13, 2014•Workshop #2: Mar. 27, 2014•Meeting: Apr 10 2014
45
Meeting: Apr. 10, 2014
Upcoming activitiesNext Community Advisory Group meeting• Wednesday, April 30 from 5:30 p.m. to 8:30
p.m., location to be determined
46
Contact usPSE Contact:
Leann Kostek, Senior Project Manager
Sta in to chStay in touch:pse.com/energizeeastsideenergizeeastside@pse [email protected]
47
THANK YOU!THANK YOU!
48