Copyright 0 1986 by the Genetics Society of America
COINCIDENT GENE CONVERSION EVENTS IN YEAST THAT INVOLVE A LARGE
INSERTION
JOHN E. GOLIN,*,' S. CARL FALCO* AND JEANNE P. MARGOLSKEEt**
"Central Research and Development, E. I . d u Pont de Nemours and
Company, Wilmington, Delaware 19898, and +Department of
Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Calijornia,
San Francisco, Calijornia 9 4 1 4 3
Manuscript received December 13, 1985 Revised copy accepted August
16, 1986
ABSTRACT
In yeast, spontaneous gene conversion events involving sites that
are far apart (16 cM) occur 1000 times more frequently in mitotic
cells than is expected for two independent acts of recombination.
It has been proposed that a major por- tion of these could be due
to a long, continuous heteroduplex intermediate. We have examined
this possibility in further detail by introducing, via transforma-
tion, a large plasmid insertion between the LEU1 and TRPS loci and
studying its behavior among coincident convertants involving the
flanking sites. Among such convertants, there is frequent loss of
the plasmid when it is present in hemizygous or homozygous
configuration. Our results could support the long heteroduplex
model for coincident recombination events, but only if novel as-
sumptions regarding the formation and fate of mismatched DNA are
made. Therefore, an alternative model that proposes multiple,
concerted recombination events is discussed.
N yeast, mitotic recombination appears to differ from its meiotic
counterpart I in several ways including the timing within the cell
cycle (FABRE 1978; ESPOSITO 1978; ROMAN 1980; GOLIN and ESPOSITO
1981) and the structure of the intermediates (see ESPOSITO and
WAGSTAFF 1981 for review). In addi- tion, it has recently been
demonstrated that, although spontaneous mitotic recombination
events are very infrequent, they can encompass a large region of a
chromosome (ESPOSITO 1978; GOLIN and ESPOSITO 1981, 1984; MONTE-
LONE, PRAKASH and PRAKASH 1981). Thus, in yeast, mitotic gene
conversion events involving sites 16 cM apart occur 1000 times more
frequently than is expected for two independent events. Such
enhancement is not found among meiotic or X-ray-induced
recombinants (ESPOSITO and WAGSTAFF 198 1 ; Ro- MAN and FABRE 1983;
ROMAN 1984). Furthermore, the effect shows distance dependence
(GOLIN and ESPOSITO 1984). Sites farther apart show less enhance-
ment. It has been proposed that a major portion of the coincident
events could be due to a long, continuous heteroduplex (ESPOSITO
1978; GOLIN and ESPOS- ITO 1984). The data, however, do not rule
out alternative possibilities. For
' Present address: Department of Biology, Catholiq University,
Washington, D.C. 20064. * Present address: Department of Genetics,
Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Genetics 114: 1081-1094 December, 1986
1082 J. E. COLIN, S . C. FALCO AND J. P. MARGOLSKEE
TABLE 1
JG 400
IG 302
HO a leul-c trp5-c cyh2 metl3c ade5 ade2 lys2-2 tyrl-2 his7-2
ura3-1
HO a leul-12 trp5-d CYH2 metl3d ADE5 ade2 lys2-I tyrl-1 hisl ura3-
313
JG33-18B X JG 34-38A JG34-38A with pJM53 (URA3) inte-
grated by transformation between leul-12 and trp5-d
JG 231 X JG 33-18B
HO a leul-c pJM53 (URA?) trp5-C CYH2 metl3d ADE5 ade2 LYS2 tyrl-1
hisl ura3-313 his7
JG 300RS 8-16 X JG 34-38A
IC 231 X IC 300-RS-8-16
COLIN and ESPOSITO (1 977)
COLIN and ESPOSITO (1 977)
GOLIN and ESPOSITO (1977)
Random Lys’ spore from JG300
pJM53 inserted in the leul-c, trp5- c homologue “
” ” ” Homozygous for pJM53
example, pairing of chromosomes in mitosis could be rate-limiting
for the initiation of recombination. Once such rare pairing occurs,
multiple recombi- nation events might take place in a
distance-dependent fashion.
In this report, we describe experiments in which coincident gene
conversion was analyzed at loci on either side of a large (1 1.6
kilobase pair (kbp)] insertion. The data presented in this paper
could accommodate the long heteroduplex model, although a series of
observations requires novel assumptions regarding the formation and
fate or recombination intermediates. For this reason, an
alternative to the long heteroduplex model is presented. This model
proposes that coincident conversion is due to concerted, multiple
recombination events.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Strains: The pertinent strain genotypes used in this study are
found in Table 1, and the linkage relationships of the markers used
in this study are illustrated in Figure 1. The detailed genotype
and geneology of JG44 are found elsewhere (GOLIN and ESPOS- ITO
1977, 1984).
Plasmid Plasmid pJM53 is a YIp5 derivative (BOTSTEIN et al. 1979)
that has the yeast URA3 gene inserted into the AvaI site of pBR322
and a 6.1-kbp fragment of yeast DNA inserted into the Hind111 site.
The yeast segment was obtained using a cloned LEUl gene to probe a
bacteriophage lambda library 0. P. MARCOLSKEE and I. HERSKOWJTZ,
unpublished results). The plasmid can integrate by homologous
recom- bination into a site 8.8 kbp distal to LEUl (see Table
1).
Media: Media used in this study are identical to those reported
earlier (GOLIN and ESPOSITO 1977), except that cycloheximide was
used at a concentration of 1 mg/liter. E. coli harboring pJM53 were
cultured in Luria broth plus 50 pg/ml of Ampicillin.
Growth and plating of vegetative cells: The diploids used in
recombination exper- iments were cultured as described previously
(GOLIN and ESPOSITO 1981), except that 12-ml cultures were
employed.
Calculation of recombination rates: Recombination rates were
calculated using the
COINCIDENT GENE CONVERSION IN YEAST 1083
pJM53 (UffA3I
LEU1 1 TRP5 MET13 + 12 d + CYHZ + d ADE5
3.04 7 10 0.3 79 15 86 0 ; ; I I I 1 I I I I I I
e : : I I I
1 1 I I I I
FIGURE 1.-The arrangement of genetic markers. The diploids used in
this study carry a series of markers on chromosome Vll that are
used to monitor recombination. The site of pJM53 integration is
indicated by an arrow. In addition to the pJM53 insertion, there
are three pairs of noncomplementing alleles at LEUl , TRl5 and
MET13. The ADE5 and CYHZ loci are heterozygous for recessive
mutations. Numerals indicate distance in centimorgans.
method of LEA and COULSON (1948). A description of this method's
salient features is found elsewhere (COLIN and ESPOSITO
1984).
Dissection of asci: Ascal dissection was performed by conventional
means. Sporulated diploids were treated with 0.2 ml of 1:50
dilution of glusulase (DuPont) for 5 min to dissolve the ascal
walls. Following this, tetrads were spread on a YPD plate. The
plate was placed on a microscope fitted with a micromanipulator,
and ascospores were teased apart with a dissection needle. The
ascosporal colonies were allowed to germinate and grow for 2-3 days
at 30" before genotypic analysis.
Selection of independent recombinants: To select clonally unrelated
Leu+ Trp' prototrophs, cultures of the diploids were plated on
synthetic complete medium. Single colonies were transferred to 2-ml
YPD liquid cultures which were incubated overnight and then plated
on leucine, tryptophan omission medium. Since diploids are
heteroal- lelic at the loci in question, prototrophs resulting from
mitotic gene conversion are obtained. Only one prototroph was
picked per original colony to ensure independent origin.
Genetic analysis of prototrophs: Because of its diploid nature, a
prototroph resulting from conversion between heteroalleles contains
a chromosome with a genotype (at that locus) that remains
undetermined. To ascertain the full genotype at the convertant
locus, random ascospores were collected and analyzed as follows.
The Leu+ Trp+ pro- totrophs remain heteroallelic at the unlinked
LYSZ locus. During sporulation, Lys+ colonies arise as a result of
gene conversion events (which occur at rates ca. 200 times the
mitotic levels). Random Lys' ascosporal colonies were recovered
when the sporu- lated master plate was replicated to lysineless
medium. On the average, half of these were Trp+, whereas the other
half harbored the masked chromosome. For example, when a diploid
was TRP5ltrp5-c, half of the Lys+ colonies were TRP5 and the other
half were trp5-c. The complete genotype of each recombinant was
determined by anal- ysis of 18 Lys+ meiotic segregants. These
segregants were backcrossed to tester strains for the leul, trp5
and met13 heteroallelic pairs to establish their genotypes at these
loci. The Lys+ segregants were also used to determine the genotypes
of the colonies at loci distal to TRP5 (CYHZ, MET13 and
ADE5).
DNA preparation: Plasmid DNA was prepared from bacterial strains as
described by DAVIS, BOTSTEIN and ROTH (1980) and was purified by
cesium chloride centrifugation as described by MANIATIS, FRITSCH
and SAMBROOK (1982). Yeast chromosomal DNA was isolated using the
method described by FALCO et al. (1982).
Yeast integrative transformation: The transformation of strain
JG34-38A was car- ried out as described by HINNEN, HICKS and FINK
(1978).
Nick translation of probes: Nick translation of pJM53 DNA was
carried out using a nick-translation reagent kit (BRL, Bethesda).
Labeled DNA was separated from un-
1084 J. E. GOLIN, S. C. FALCO AND J. P. MARGOLSKEE
incorporated nucleotides on a 0.9 X 15-cm column of Sephadex G-50
(Pharmacia) equilibrated with 10 mM Tris-HCI, pH 8.0, 50 mM NaCl
and 0.1 M EDTA.
Hybridization analysis: DNA hybridization was carried out by the
method of SOUTH- ERN ( 1 975). Total yeast DNA was digested with
restriction enzymes (BRL Laboratories) of choice and separated on
0.8% agarose gels by electrophoresis (40 mA, 16 hr). DNA was
transferred to nitrocellulose filters (SOUTHERN 1975); following
this, the filters were treated for 30 min at 42" in a solution of
50% formamide, 5 X SSPE, and 1 % Sarkosyl before hybridization. The
DNA was then hybridized to heat denatured, labeled probe pJM53 in
the above solution for 15 hr before washing four times (30 min,
50") in 0.1 X SSPE, 0.1% SDS. The washed filter was dried and
exposed to Kodak X-0-Mat R film with DuPont Cronex Hi-Plus
intensifying screens at -70" to reveal hybridized fragments.
RESULTS
Coincident mitotic gene conversion in diploids hemizygous for a
plasmid insertion: The purpose of this study was to determine
whether the high fre- quency of coincident mitotic conversion
events is the result of a continuous heteroduplex structure. Our
experimental approach was based on observations from a number of
organisms, including yeast, which demonstrated that the presence of
nonhomologous DNA can sometimes reduce recombination in neighboring
regions (LICHTEN and FOX 1983; HAMZA et al. 1981; SMOLIK- UTLAUT
and PETES 1983). Thus, if coincident gene conversion events at LEUl
and TRP5 were due to a continuous structure, placing a large
insertion or deletion between the loci might reduce the observed
frequency of double recombinants. To accomplish this end, we placed
the plasmid pJM53 via in- tegrative transformation between the two
loci to create a large insertion flanked by a 6.1-kb direct repeat.
The yeast strains JG44 and JG300 are isogenic except for the
hemizygous plasmid insertion present in the latter (Table 1). The
JG302 and JG400 strains are closely related, although not isogenic
to the others. The diploids contain heteroallelic, noncomplementing
mutations at a number of loci including TRPS and LEUl on chromosome
VIZ. Recombination is assayed by plating out cells on the
appropriate omission media and counting the colonies which arise.
The colonies are not due to back mutation at either of the sites
(GOLIN and ESPOSITO 1977).
The linkage relationships of the markers in question were verified
by analysis of more than 50 tetrads (data not shown). The diploids
were tested for the stability of the plasmid insertion.
Approximately 500 colonies were picked from nonselective media and
tested; all were Ura+. To determine whether the plas- mid was
present in single or multiple copy number, Southern hybridization
analysis (SOUTHERN 1975) was performed. These results, shown and
explained in Figure 2, indicate that a single plasmid copy is
present in each strain. To determine whether the presence of the
insertion had any effect on the rate of formation of Leu+ Trp+
recombinants, ten cultures of the JG300 diploid and the isogenic
but non-plasmid-bearing strain JG44 were grown and plated on
leucine, tryptophan and tryptophan-leucine omission media as
described in MATERIALS AND METHODS. The rate of gene conversion at
each locus (LEU1 and TRPS) and the rate of coincident conversion
were determined. In addition, Leu+ Trpf colonies were picked and
analyzed for their genotypes at the URA3
COINCIDENT GENE CONVERSION IN YEAST 1085
FIGURE 2.-Characterization o f strains by hybridization analysis.
To determine whether pJM53 was present in single or multiple copy,
yeast DNA was prepared and digested overnight with PvulI, a
restriction enzyme with one site in pJM53 outside the 6.1-kb pair
yeast fragment. The DNA was then run on a gel, blotted and probed
using the procedures described in MATERIALS AND METHODS. The
presence of pJM53 in more than one copy per chromosome would have
been indicated by a fragment of plasmid unit length. Lane 1 , PuulI
cut pJM53; lane 2, JG34-38A; lane 3, JG231; lane 4,
JG300-RS-8-16.
insertion, the TRP5 locus and the LEUl locus. Since the Leu+ Trp+
recombi- nants remain diploid, these prototrophs contain
chromosomes with complete genotypes that remain undetermined. To
ascertain the full genotype, random spore analysis was used (see
MATERIALS AND METHODS).
The results, which are found in Tables 2 and 3, can be summarized
as follows: First, the rate at which Leu+ Trp+ events arise in
JG300 was only slightly less than the rate of comparable events in
JG44. Therefore, the pres- ence of a plasmid insertion has little,
or no, effect on the rate of coincident gene conversion at these
loci. Second, the genotypes of the coincident recom- binants
recovered in JG300 were similar to JG44. For example, Leu+ Trp+
events are three to five times more likely to be associated with
homozygosity of markers distal to TRP5 than are Trp+ events which
did not involve LEUl. Of the 53 Leu+ Trp+ events analyzed, 17 (30%)
were homozygous for the CYH2, MET13 and ADE5 loci, in contrast to
only 6% of the total Trp+ popu- lation. There is also a marked
polarity for recovery of the leul-c allele among coincident
convertants that is not found among single locus (Leu+) recombi-
nants (see PLOTKIN 1978; COLIN and ESPOSITO 1981). This phenomenon
was also found previously for the non-plasmid control (COLIN and
ESPOSITO 1984; J. COLIN, unpublished results). Similar results were
obtained in the analysis of many independent Leu+ Trp+ events
described later. Third, most of the Leu+ Trp+ recombinants (68%)
were Ura- and must therefore have lost the URA3 gene present in the
plasmic insertion. The rest were primarily URA3lura3. URA31URA3
recombinants were rarely (1 in 53) recovered.
To verify the results obtained from this analysis, 172 independent
Leu+ Trp+ recombinants were collected. One hundred twenty-five
(73%) were Ura-. Ninety of the 172 were tested for their genotype
at the CYH2 and ADE5 loci. A total of 23 (26%) exhibited
homozygosity for these markers. Therefore, the
1086 J. E. COLIN, S. C. FALCO AND J. P. MARGOLSKEE
TABLE 2
Total Trp' Diploid Culture no. x lo5
JG300
10
10
3.5 2.7 1.7 2.2 3.5 1.4 1.3 2.2 1.7 1.5
1.7 0.2
7.1 5.1 3.6 1.9 3.1 3.2 2.9 3.0 4.2 3.7
3.2 0.5
rota1 Leu+ Total Leu+ x I O 5 Trp+ X 10'
3.3 0.1 20 0.3
3.8 0.2 2.8 0.2 3.4 0.2 2.3 0.4 2.5 0.1 3.4 0.5 2.4 0.2 2.4
0.2
2.8 0.2 0.4 0.1
20 1.4 14 0.6 5.3 0.6 2.2 0.3 3.5 0.3 3.9 0.5 3.8 0.2 3.4 0.6
10 0.2 5.2 0.1
3.9 0.3 0.5 0.2
4.1 6.8 9.0
11 4.5
behavior of the independent recombinants and those derived from
culture are very similar.
Coincident gene conversion was also examined in JG400. This strain
is hem- izygous with respect to pJM53, but the insertion is in the
other homologue (Eeul-c, pJM53, trp5-c). As was the case with
JG300, the presence of pJM53 had little, if any, effect on the rate
of coincident Leu+ TrpC recombinants (data not shown). The
distribution of URA3 genotypes is, nevertheless, mark- edly
different. Of 60 independent Leu+ Trp+ recombinants analyzed, only
ten (-16%) were Ura-. Of the remainder, 38 (75%) were URA3/ura3,
while 12 (25%) were URA3/URAJ. The basis for the difference between
JG300 and JG400 remains unclear at the present time.
Analysis of recombination in strains homozygous for an insertion:
The pJM53 insertion is lost during coincident gene conversion in
homozygous (JG302) diploids. Coincident Leu+ Trp+ recombinants
arise in JG302 at about the same frequency that they do in the
hemizygous strains (data not shown). Tetrad analysis of 57
independently derived coincident convertants revealed that 35 (-61
%) were either LJRA3/ura3 or ura3/ura3 (Table 4) and had there-
fore lost one or both copies of the plasmid.
COINCIDENT GENE CONVERSION IN YEAST
TABLE 3
1087
Genotype at pJM53
- ura3 URA3 uRA3 Total Allele recovery - - ura3 ura3 um3 observed
(no.) Genotype at L e d , TRPS
1. LEUl leul-c
1 leu-I2 (5)
TABLE 4
URA3 genotypes of Leu' Trp+ events collected from a pJM53
homozygote
ura3 an a 1 y z e d URA3 ura3 ura3
- - - No. of events LIRA3 URA3
57 22 28 7
Analysis of putative Ura+ revertants: A striking feature of Leu+
Ura- re- combinants is the appearance of nearly confluent growth on
uracil omission media after 48-72 hr of incubation. When such
material was streaked out on YPD (nutrient) media and the subclones
tested for their phenotype, all were Leu+ Ura+ Trp+. When the
original Leu+ Trp+ Ura- colony was streaked and tested, however,
less than 0.1% of the subclones were Ura+ (see rate deter- mination
data described below). Southern hybridization analysis of DNA pre-
pared from single colony subclones of the initial Ura- recombinant
and sub- sequent revertants demonstrated that pJM53 was absent in
the former, but
1088 J. E. COLIN, S. C. FALCO AND J. P. MARCOLSKEE
1 2 3 4 5 6
FIGURE 3.-Hybridization analysis of Ura+ revertants. To determine
whether a Ura+ revertant is due to the presence of integrated
pJM53, Southern blot hybridization was performed on Leu+ Trp+
recombinants. The initial Ura- Leu+ Trp+ colony and subsequent Ura+
revertants were streaked on YPD media to obtain single colony
isolates. These were used as a source of DNA. The DNA was cut with
Xhol. an enzyme making a unique cut within the 6.1-kbp yeast
fragment. The presence of an intact plasmid in the original JG300
strain (lane 1) and two revertants (lanes 3 and 5 ) is shown. The
initial Ura- Leu+ Trp+ recombinants (lanes 4 and 6) have a
hybridization pattern identical to the isogenic,
non-plasmid-bearing control strain JG44 (lane 2).
TABLE 5
Revertant PD NPD TT
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 R10
14 12 15 21 20
5 18 17 10 29
0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0
0 1 1 0 2 5 2 1 0 4
a PD = parental ditype, NPD = nonparental ditype, TT = tetratype.
For any cross, an excess of PDs us. TTs and NPDs indicates
linkage.
present in the latter (Figure 3). The hybridization patterns of the
revertants were identical to those obtained from the initial JG300
(pJM53 hemizygote) diploid. The map position of the putative Ura+
revertants derived from ten independently isolated Leu+ Trp+
recombinants was determined. To do this, single colonies isolated
from revertant patches were sporulated, and the re-
COINCIDENT GENE CONVERSION IN YEAST
TABLE 6
1089
Total UraC Cfu/culture Culture x 1 0 5 x 10-7
1 1 . 1 2.3 x 107 2 20 1 . 1 x 107 3 1.3 0.9 x io7 4 0.5 7.4 x 107
5 15 5.4 x 107 6 22 1.4 x 107 7 9.3 3.9 x 107 8 3.3 4.7 x 107 9 110
2.3 x io7
Median frequency 3.3 Median rate 0.5
sulting tetrads were dissected. The results, shown in Table 5,
demonstrate tight linkage of URA3 to LEU1 in nine of ten cases
analyzed.
The rate of reversion from Ura- to Ura+ was also determined. T o do
this, Leu+ Trp' Ura- colonies were suspended in 1 ml of YPD media
and were allowed to grow overnight before harvesting and plating.
The results, presents in Table 6, indicate a rate of about one Ura+
revertant/105 cell-forming units. This suggests that reinsertion
takes place after an initial lag of over ten gen- erations.
DISCUSSION
The data presented in this paper can be summarized as follows.
First, the presence of a large region of nonhomology (the plasmid
insertion pJM53) has little or no effect on the frequency of
coincident gene conversion events in- volving loci flanking both
sides of the insertion. Second, in hemizygous strains, the plasmid
insertion is lost (resulting in a Ura- phenotype) at high frequency
(70%) from Leuf Trp+ recombinants when it is between the leul-12
and trp5- d alleles, but at a fourfold lower frequency when it is
inserted between leul-c and trp5-c. Third, the plasmid is also lost
at high frequency from diploids which bear it in homozygous
configuration. Finally, reversion from a Ura- to a Ura+ phenotype
frequently occurs. Genetic mapping and DNA hybridization
experiments indicate that the Ura+ revertants result from
restoration of pJM53 at its original location.
Two models have been put forth to account for the high frequency,
distance- dependent coincident mitotic gene conversion of widely
separated genes in yeast (GOLIN and ESPOSITO 1984). The first
proposes that co-conversion is due to a single long heteroduplex
recombination intermediate, whereas the second proposes that it is
due to multiple concerted recombination events following some
rate-limiting step, such as pairing of homologous chromosomes.
These models can now be considered in light of the observations
presented above.
LICHTEN and Fox (1983) found that regions of nonhomology bracketing
a
1090 J. E. GOLIN, S. C. FALCO AND J. P. MARGOLSKEE
0
1
'T-- 2
I - > FIGURE 4.-A model to explain the behavior of pJM53 in
coincident recombination events.
The figure shows the first of two mechanisms proposed to account
for the behavior of pJM53 in coincident recombination events
involving the LEU1 and TRP5 loci. The figure illustrates plasmid
loss by excision of a single-stranded loop from a symmetric
heteroduplex at the two-strand stage of mitosis. In this diagram,
the plasmid is drawn with the duplicated yeast chromosomal region
indicated as - and the YIp5 sequences as - - -. Each line
represents a single polynucleotide chain. The "+" indicates the
URA3 gene present in YIp5. If the loop is excised with great
preference, the -/- class could be found in excess, whereas the +/+
class would be comparatively rare.
genetic interval on bacteriophage X reduce recombination in that
interval, particularly in replication-restricted crosses. This
observation is consistent with the idea that the nonhomology
prevents branch migration of a Holliday-type heteroduplex
recombination intermediate into the interval. However, in the same
study, evidence from multifactor crosses carried out under
replication- permitted conditions suggested that nonhomologies
could be included in re- gions of heteroduplex DNA. In yeast, most
mitotic gene conversion occurs before DNA replication (ESPOSITO
1978; FABRE 1978; COLIN and ESPOSITO 1981; ROMAN 1980; ROMAN and
FABRE 1983). Thus, it was of interest to investigate the effect of
a large nonhomologous insertion on coincident gene conversion of
flanking markers. The observation that the nonhomology had little
or no effect on the frequency or character of coincident conversion
events indicates either that a nonhomology can be included in a
region of heterodu- plex DNA in yeast or that long heteroduplexes
are not the source of the coincident conversions.
The frequent loss of the plasmid insertions from hemizygous strains
can be accommodated by either the long heteroduplex model or
multiple concerted recombination events model. The long
heteroduplex model could account for the Ura- events because the
creation of extensive heteroduplex DNA spanning the LEUl-TRP5
region would result in a single-stranded loop that might be
preferentially excised from the JG300 diploids (Figure 4). BENZ and
BURGER (1973) proposed such a mechanism to account for selective
loss of the wild- type allele from crosses between wild-type and
rZZ-deletion mutants of bacte-
COINCIDENT GENE CONVERSION IN YEAST
1
1091
1
tion by intrachromosomal recombination. figure illustrates loss of
the plasmid inser-
riophage T4. No such process has been observed previously in yeast,
however. The multiple events model could explain loss of the
plasmid insertion by a separate, but associated, intrachromosomal
event: homologous recombination between the direct repeats (Figure
5) . There is ample precedent for the latter mechanism in yeast
(SCHERER and DAVIS 1979; ROEDER and FINK 1980), al- though
association of intrachromosomal and interchromosomal events has not
been reported.
The frequent loss of the plasmid insertion among Leu' Trp+
recombinants from an insertion homozygote is more difficult to
explain within the context of the long heteroduplex model. Figure 6
illustrates how misalignment of the insertion could lead to a
series of single-stranded loops. One or both of these could be
cleaved to give recombinants. Misalignment of the insert on both
chromosomes is required to produce a ura3/ura3 recombinant. The
fact that the plasmid is lost from the homozygous diploid as
frequently as from the hemizygous diploid requires that the
misaligned structure drawn in Figure 6 occurs more frequently than
the properly aligned structure. This seems un-
1092 J. E. COLIN, S. C. FALCO AND J. P. MARGOLSKEE
1 -
FIGURE 6.-Loss of plasmid in a homozygote by misalignment. The
figure illustrates how pJM53 could be lost from a homozygote strain
by a mechanism analogous to that proposed in A. Misa- lignment of
direct repeats in a heteroduplex could create two single-stranded
loops. Preferential excision would lead to cells which are either
Ura-/Ura- or Ura+/Ura-.
likely. The multiple events model can explain loss of the plasmid
from the homozygous diploid by the same intrachromosomal
recombination mechanism as proposed for the hemizygous
strain.
Reversion from Ura- to Ura+ by restoration of pJM53 to its original
chro- mosomal location is also more difficult to explain by the
long heteroduplex model. It must be proposed that a precisely
excised single-stranded DNA re- gion either persists and
reintegrates by single-strand assimilation (RADDING 1982) or
replicates and reintegrates later through a double-stranded
interme- diate. The multiple events model proposes that the excised
double-stranded circle persists and is later reintegrated by a
reversal of the excision reaction.
Thus far, we have assumed that most mitotic gene conversion occurs
before DNA replication. Genetic analysis clearly indicates that
this is the case (ESPOS- ITO 1978; FABRE 1978; GOLIN and ESPOSITO
1981; ROMAN 1980; ROMAN and FABRE 1983). This interpretation can be
extended to coincident convertants with two important reservations.
First, genotypic analysis of coincident recom- binants to date
cannot rule out a GP contribution. Second, recent evidence suggests
that although X-ray-induced gene conversion occurs at the
two-strand stage, associated intergenic exchange may be completed
following DNA repli- cation (ROMAN and FABRE 1983; ROMAN 1984).
This could provide an alter- native explanation for the high
frequency loss of the plasmid insertion from a long heteroduplex
recombination intermediate. A major difference between the two- and
four-strand stages is the presence of sister chromatids in the
latter. If coincident conversion in long heteroduplexes was
associated with high frequencies of unequal crossing over between
the direct repeats of sister strands, Ura- recombinants could be
produced. Although sister chromatid
COINCIDENT GENE CONVERSION IN YEAST 1093
exchanges of this type have been reported in yeast, they appear to
be relatively rare (JACKSON and FINK 1981). In addition, such a
mechanism for generating Ura- recombinants does not account for the
frequent reversion to Ura+ ob- served.
In summary, the data presented in this paper do not eliminate the
long heteroduplex model as an explanation for coincident mitotic
gene conversion events. However, a model proposing multiple
associated recombinant event appears to better fit the data. The
analysis of recombination in strains bearing insertions which do
not have direct repeats is a critical test of the models. The long
heteroduplex model predicts that these will also be lost with high
fre- quency during recombination events involving LEU1 and TRP5
when the in- sertion is present in hemizygous configuration. In
contrast, the multiple events model predicts increased stability
because intrachromosomal recombination be- tween direct repeats
cannot occur.
We thank DEBBIE CHALEFF, IRA HERSKOWITZ, BOB LAROSSA, HERSCHEL
ROMAN and especially FRANK STAHL for their incisive comments on
several drafts of this manuscript. Work at the University of
California, San Francisco, on the construction of pJM53 was
supported by National Institutes of Health research grants to IRA
HERSKOWITZ.
LITERATURE CITED
BENZ, W. C. and H. BERCER, 1973 Selective allele loss in mixed
infections with T 4 bacteriophage.
BOTSTEIN, D., S. C. FALCO, S. STEWART, M. BRENNAN, S. SCHERER, D.
T. STINCHCOMB, K. STRUHL and R. W. DAVIS, 1979 Sterile host yeast
(SHY): a eucaryotic system of biological contain- ment for
recombinant DNA experiments. Gene 8: 17-24.
DAVIS, R. W., D. BOTSTEIN AND J. R. ROTH, 1980 Advanced Bacterial
Genetics: A Manual for Genetic Engineering. Cold Spring Harbor
Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
ESPOSITO, M. S., 1978 Evidence that spontaneous mitotic
recombination occurs at the two-strand stage. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA 75: 4436-4440.
Mechanisms of mitotic recombination. pp. 341-370. In: The Molecular
Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces. Life Cycle and Inheritance,
Edited by J. N. STRATHERN, E. JONES and J. BROACH. Cold Spring
Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
FABRE, F., 1978 Induced intragenic recombination in yeast can occur
in GI mitotic phase. Nature
FALCO, S. C., L. YUYANG, J. R. BROACH and D. BOTSTEIN. 1982 Genetic
consequences of chro-
Genetics 73: 1-1 1 .
272: 795-798.
mosomally integrated 2r plasmid DNA in yeast. Cell 2 9
583-584.
GOLIN, J. and M. S. ESPOSITO, 1977 Evidence for the joint genetic
control of spontaneous mu- tation and genetic recombination during
mitosis in Saccharomyces. Mol. Gen. Genet. 150: 127- 135.
COLIN, J. and M. S. ESPOSITO, 198 1 Mitotic recombination: mismatch
correction and replicational resolution of Holliday structures
formed at the two-strand stage in Saccharomyces. Mol. Gen. Genet.
183: 252-263.
Coincident gene conversion during mitosis in Saccharomyces.
Hybrid DNA formation
GOLIN, J. and M. S. ESPOSITO, 1984
HAMZA, H., J. HAEDEUS, A. MEKKI-BERNDA and J. L. ROSSIGNOL,
1981
Genetics 107: 355-365.
during meiotic recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78:
7648-7651.
1094
HINNEN, A., J. B. HICKS and G. R. FINK, 1978 Transformation of
yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
JACKSON, J. and G. R. FINK, 1981 Gene conversion between duplicated
genetic elements in yeast.
LEA, D. E. and C. A. COULSON, 1948 The distribution of numbers of
mutants in bacterial populations. J. Genet. 49: 264-284.
LICHTEN, M. and M. S. Fox, 1983 Effects of nonhomology on
bacteriophage lambda recombi- nation. Genetics 103: 5-22.
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual.
J. E. COLIN, S . C. FALCO AND J. P. MARGOLSKEE
USA 75: 1929-1933.
Nature 292: 306-309.
MANIATIS, T. , E. F. FRITSCH and J. SAMBROOK, 1982 Cold Spring
Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
MMS 8-1, an allele of the CDC9 gene of Saccharomyces cermisiae. J.
Bacteriol. 147: 517-525.
tation, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Rev. Genet. 16: 405-437.
ROEDER, G. S. and G. R. FINK, 1980 in yeast. Cell 21:
239-249.
berg Res. Commun. 45: 21 1-224.
MONTELONE, B. A., S. PRAKASH and L. PRAKASH, 1981 Spontaneous
mitotic recombination in
PLOTKIN, D. J., 1978
RADDING, C. M., 1982
DNA rearrangements associated with a transposable element
Recombination in diploid vegetative cells of Saccharomyces
cerevisiae. Carls-
A comparison of induced and spontaneous gene conversion in mitotic
and
ROMAN, H. L. and F. FABRE, 1983 Gene conversion events and
associated reciprocal recombi- nation are separable events in
vegetative cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA S O 6912-6916.
SCHERER, S. and R. W. DAVIS, 1979 Replacement of chromosomal
segments with altered DNA sequences constructed in vitro. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76: 4951-4955.
SMOLIK-UTLAUT, S. and T. D. PETES, 1983 Recombination of plasmids
into the Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome is reduced by small
amounts of sequence heterogeneity. Mol. Cell. Biol.
Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by
gel
Communicating editor: I. HERSKOWITZ
ROMAN, H. L., 1980
ROMAN, H. L., 1984 meiotic cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Carlsberg Res. Commun. 49: 35 1-358.
3: 1204-1211.